Good

👍

Là ou l'on voit qu'elle est concue et fabriquée en Bretagne cette frégate c'est qu'ils lui ont mis un...chapeau de Merlin:))))! On le voit à 2'40"" hhh

The French defence minister is one attractive lady. 😆😆😆😇😇😇

@calgar42k

4 жыл бұрын

You ve weird tastes!!!

A quand les commentaires en Français ??

@uncitoyen_8614

3 жыл бұрын

Ce n'est pas une chaîne française, les questions sont posées en anglais.

Ce serait mieux d'avoir des videos en français sous-titrées en anglais !

@ericdumond5912

3 жыл бұрын

@French& Scottish tu devrais consulter un psychologue ... Bonne Année 2021 quand même

Can't have very good range as mounted so low down.

@lordtemplar9274

4 жыл бұрын

500km range is pretty damn good, more than type 45 by 25% maybe next time actually listen to what is said in video before making comment

@sensibledriver933

4 жыл бұрын

@@lordtemplar9274 Range is determinted by curvature of the earth. You cannot see a sea skimming missile that far away if the panels are mounted low down. Type 45 radar is mounted 45 meters high so will obviously see farther.

@lordtemplar9274

4 жыл бұрын

@@sensibledriver933 by your expert calculations what range difference does a few meters do when you are talking vast distances? Please enlighten me. To effectively overcome the curvature of the earth you need to be a lot higher with a plane like an AWACS. Furthermore the FDI radar has 4 fixed panels giving total coverage of 360° azimuth and 90° elevation, so no blind spots. The type 45 uses only 2 panels rotating 30x per min, giving you about 0.5 sec blind spot

@sensibledriver933

4 жыл бұрын

@@lordtemplar9274 Simple explanation. If you look over a 5 ft fence you will only see what is visible from the distance you are. Two ways you can see more is walk closer or stand higher. It isn't rocket science. When trying to track sea skimming missiles, that extra 5 or so miles at sea level is of more benefit than a radar that has continuous coverage over one that can only see every 0.5 seconds, unless the missile can cover 5 miles in 0.5 seconds. Don't forget that type 45 also has that huge black panel that can be pointed in the threat directon which has continupus coverage but only in the direction it is pointed. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar_horizon

@lordtemplar9274

4 жыл бұрын

@@sensibledriver933 if you bother to look at the maths you will see that a few meters of mast height only makes a small difference when we are talking detection distances in km. Based on incomplete info, we are hypothetically talking approx. a 13 miles vs 14 miles horizon detection range for sea skimming missile. That is a difference of just over 1 mile, and certainly not 5 miles as you completely made up. It's not like horizon detection doubles if your mast is twice as high. Do you even know the height of FDI? As i said earlier, the only practical way to overcome OTH in the open sea is with AWACS type planes, like a E2D Hawkeye on a carrier (or a crows nest on a heli). Of course there are OTH radars on land but these are massive installations and would not fit on a ship. None of this changes that you claimed it "can't have good radar range" when in fact FDI has +25% radar range than Type 45 widely regarded as having excellent detection capabilities (500km vs 400km). FDI is a multipurpose midsize frigate and costs a lot less than Type 45 whose main purpose is aerial defence. (FYI French Navy uses Horizon class for anti air carrier escort.) In addition to aerial defence, FDI runs low noise and has in-hull sonar array + towed sonar for ASW. It's a lot of bang for buck in a state of the art package. So your criticsm is completely unwarranted. I bet Royal Navy would be happy to have Thales Sea Fire 500 on its Type 31, we will see what radar they choose to equip in the not too distant future. 😉

Il en faudra 15 et pas 5 tant la géopolitique méditerranéenne va plonger dans le chaos !

@tonyparker3527

3 жыл бұрын

Ils n’y a pas que la Méditerranée dans la vie, on a tendance à oublier les outre-mer dans ce pays à croire que l’on en a rien à battre

@uncitoyen_8614

3 жыл бұрын

​@@tonyparker3527 Les frégates sont des navires de guerre, ils ne se destinent pas à défendre les outre-mer qui ont myriade de corvettes et patrouilleurs pour contrôler leurs eaux territoriales (peut-être même mieux défendues que celles de métropole).

@jodan4043

3 жыл бұрын

@French& Scottish de toute façon on est tous foutus... On mange trop ! 😉

@Klliansimabras

3 жыл бұрын

@French& Scottish La DGA pense à l'outre-mer. Nous avons des troupes, des bases et des navires là bas qui patrouillent et pour défendre la zone maritime économique.

@Klliansimabras

3 жыл бұрын

@Brandon FR La France envoie beaucoup trop d'argent dans des projets qui normalement seront bientôt terminé comme le Projet ITER qui occupe 20 milliards d'Euros dont plus de 2 milliards par la France (son activité débutera en 2025). Ou comme la Stratobus qui occupe 100 à 150 millions d'euros et sera terminé normalement cette année (et sera disponible pour la commercialisation), il pourra servir de relais de communication, dispositif d'observation... (il a la même fonction qu'un satellite mais dans la stratosphère et sera habité et manoeuvrable). Sans parler de l'Eurodrone qui sera bientôt en commercialisation, si le marché international est satisfait, nous pourrons agrandir la flotte.