I have the both the 28-200mm and the 24-105mm. I am going thru the same struggle. I find myself always reaching for the 28-200mm when ever I am going out for a hike or just walking around. It is very versatile. I don't notice much difference in sharpness at all. I am still hanging on the 24-105mm because it is such a good lens, but I rarely use it since I purchased the Tamron.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, Mark! I still have my 24-105mm, too. :-)

@CC-gt3ro

3 жыл бұрын

Difficult choice. It is difficult to bring a lot of zoom lenses in the bag. So one that cover more is better. However we want also quality lens. I have the tamron 17-28 probably the best for me would be to go with the 28-200. If i take the sony 24-104 i have also to take the tamron 70-300 which is even better focal but i need more heavy lenses in the bag. Very difficult to choose. The 24-105 must be better lens better autofocus in low light with the stabilization. Right?

@mdyz

3 жыл бұрын

@@CC-gt3ro @C C Funny you mention the low light performance. I just noticed it for the first time a few days ago. The Tamron 28-200mm struggled a bit to get focus in low light. I don't use it that often on the long end in low light. I have not experienced the same focusing struggles on the wide end wide open. I do have to be more careful with the Tamron with shutter speed because of the lack of stabilization. It's just something I adjust for. Right now I seem to always have in a backpack the 17-28mm, 28-200mm and the Sigma 100-400mm.

Thank you for the information and the link about the update! I would never found it by myself

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Glad it helped. Thanks for watching and commenting, tiamotiodio! Stay safe.

I bought the Tamron 28-200 few weeks ago. I am so delighted with this lens that I will sell my Tamron 28-75. Optically, those 2 lenses are almost the same.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, I reconsidered Tamron 28-75, too. Glad I went with the 28-200. Thanks for watching and sharing, Oguz! Stay safe.

@bioliv1

3 жыл бұрын

Last table: sonyalpha.blog/2020/07/08/tamron-28-200mm-f2-8-f5-6-di-iii-rxd/

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, Foto4Max! Enjoy your 28-200! Stay safe.

@spirg

15 күн бұрын

Glad to hear !! Getting one in few weeks!!!

Subscribed your channel… really liked the familiar way you have while narrating especially at the of the video when you said to cherish moments more than thinking or overthinking the capture part … your heart and mind capture more than a camera could ever do :) Live from Toronto

@Tech4Baba

2 жыл бұрын

So glad to hear! Thanks for letting me know, Nodes of Travel. What a reminder to capture the moment with our heart and mind first! My grandma lived in Toronto. Many great memories with her there! Stay well.

This is basically a 28-75 f/2.8-4 that also goes to 200mm. Replaced two lenses in my bag. Best superzoom I’ve ever shot. Demolishes the Sony 24-240. Makes the 24-105/4 and 28-75/2.8 pretty irrelevant. It’s my go-to lens for everything, most especially Disney World, zoos, and the airport. Like you, I have two kids (age 3 and 5), we have a dog... I have a wife that doesn’t especially need me changing lenses. 28-200 all the way!

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Haha, yes, exactly why 28-200 is the one I grab when I'm out and about with kids and family! Thanks for watching and sharing, mykel8! Safe and happy holidays to you and your family!

@taimanchan2650

3 жыл бұрын

@@Tech4Baba Could 28-200 nails the shots like 24-105? Cuz I'm thinking about switching from 24-105 to 28-200. Thanks a lot!

Just found your video and I think your down to earth view on this lens gets it completely right. You mentioned all that matters for everyday life of a photographing family parent. Leave pixel peeping and tech overkill to others 😉 I love my 28-200 for it’s reach and compactness. To compensate for the loss on the wide end I added a tiny Samyang/Rokinon 18mm 2.8. Now I have 18-200 in a small camera bag.

@Tech4Baba

2 жыл бұрын

Yup, that's a great setup you have. Thanks for watching and sharing, Uwe Uhr!

Tks for your review. I'm travelling a lot and I've had in the past the most versatile Sony 24/240. Large span of focals but quite average and not enough sharpness with a A7R3. Good for a A7 serie. Now when I'm travelling and for familly shots, I'm using the RX10IV and this tool is the most versatile, compact and high quality, and also light for any situation. So yes it's an "only" 1" sensor, but for small prints and social media, it exceeds the requested quality.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

You're welcome, Patrick! Thanks for watching and sharing. RX10IV is certainly great option for travel. Stay safe.

Just bought the 28-200 today (needed a zoom) to go with my Tamron 28-75, Tamron 35 2.8, Samyang 18 2.8, canon 50 1.4 and canon 85 1.8. Thanks for the review, it's on sale right now for $650.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, EZ ON THE EYES PHOTOGRAPHY! Love the name. Enjoy your new lens! That's a great set of lenses you got. Stay safe.

I couldn't agree more with your final thoughts. Years and years from now, your family and you will appreciate more the memories captured than the pixel peeping and metadata of each image.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Very true! Thanks for watching til the end and commenting, Robert! Stay safe.

Great thoughts at the end! As an ex-wedding photog, thinking less on the "best" lens is no longer a priority given it's not a paid gig but like a wedding photog/photojournalism, getting the shot is more important than thinking if the corners are sharp or not. Without a second body, you'll more often than not miss that shot with a sharp but limited zoom lens.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching all the way to the end and sharing, Smellyt0fu! So true that getting the shot is much more important. Stay well.

I travel with the 17-28mm and 28-200. Love it!!!

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Yup, that's what I've been doing, too! Perfect combo. Thanks for watching and sharing, Nicholas! Stay well.

Great video! Loved your concluding statements! Very good point. :)

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching til the end and commenting, Thomas! Stay safe.

Great video! I just ordered the 28-200mm! I was using a Canon 24-70 f 2.8 with a metabones, hope I don't miss the 4 mm wider angle.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, Jitendra! Good choice. May just miss the 4mm from time to time like me but you will enjoy the 28-200mm for sure! Stay safe.

24-150 or 20-100 would be a home-run, regardless of aperture.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Totally agree! Thanks for watching and commenting, Frank! Stay safe.

@garybrown9719

3 жыл бұрын

They will never make the perfect lens. Any way it would be massive Panasonic makes a 10-25mm= 20-50mm and it is massive and micro four thirds

@possisvideos

3 жыл бұрын

agree

@CC-gt3ro

3 жыл бұрын

Or a Sony 24-200mm f2.8-5.6. Or a Sony or Tamron 28-300mm f2.8-6.3. Currently we could combine tamron 17-28 with Sony 24-105 and tamron 70-300 if we don’t care switching lens which give you the best focal length coverage OR 17-28 and 28-200 is probably the best duo and using crop mode to get the 300mm

I like your point of view. Thanks to you, I am starting consider buying 28-200 Tamron together with A7C to replace current a6400.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, Chris! That's a great combo to start with in Full Frame. Good luck with your decision! Stay safe!

@CC-gt3ro

3 жыл бұрын

I bought 2 days ago the a7c and tamron 17-28. What a fantastic camera! My wife and I are impressed by the quality of the photos. I didn’t tested the video yet. But i can tell i like the compactness. The total weight with the lens is already 939g i would not want a bigger body. The flip screen is fabulous and i was pleasantly surprised by the evf. As a contrary of many reviewer i found the screen large enough very clear and responsive. I come from a 2010 Canon camcorder. This sony a7c evf is impressive, very big to my opinion.. i have not seen bigger body evf but I haven’t a good sight and i have no issue at all without any glasses with the evf inside. Maybe outside with the sun will be different but inside it is perfect to me. I love the sony a7c. I will keep it for many years. It is impressive. Now i need either a tamron 28-200 or a duo sony 24-105 and tamron 70-300 but my wallet tell me the tamron 28-200 will probably be the winner. I also need a gimbal and flash so i need to make some choices. I wait also a grip extender from Sony as my pinky does not cover the body. It is a new camera but in few months a tons of accessories will be available. I have already seen a smallrig cage and screen protector and hand strap

I appreciate your take on this, there are so many directions one can take when assembling a kit of lenses.. I’ve been bouncing between options for over a year now, and still don’t know what I’d want

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, Blooshade! Certainly part of the fun. Enjoy your journey!

Very honest opinion, Thanks.

Wow the last message you gave hit me.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Good to hear! Thanks for watching to the end and letting me know, Sheffy sheff! Stay well.

My Sony 24-105G and 24-240 both nail focus at every focal lenght.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Focus on Sony is impressive. Thanks for watching and commenting, David! Stay safe.

Actually 24-105mm seems to be a working lens for event / wedding, faster AF, fix F4 aperture, Image Stabilizer, and TAMRON 28-200mm better for traveling. Since 2 lens have many overlap so I decided keep 24-105mm.

@Tech4Baba

2 жыл бұрын

True. Thanks for watching and sharing, Scott! Stay well.

Great comparison. Just found your channel and subscribe immediately after watch this video

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Great to hear. Welcome! Thanks for subscribing and letting me know, Ryan! Happy Chinese New Year!

Love the Dad POV! I really like to keep things simple and get shots of fast, so a flexible lens is essential. I have the Sony 24-240 which is great, but the picture quality isn't the best... Do I swap it for the Tamron or get better quality with the 24-105? But really your wife and mine are the wisest! The gear is secondary to the experience.

@Tech4Baba

2 жыл бұрын

They are indeed! Either the Tamron or 24-105 will be better than the 24-240 so you can't go wrong. Check out my struggle between the two, kzread.info/dash/bejne/no2ZrK6zqbKniZs.html. Thanks for watching and sharing, Role with Advantage!

I'd say if u already have the Sony, stick with it, otherwise get the Tamron. I do have the Sony 100-400 as well, so if I need more reach especially for wildlife I use that. Also, Sony A7RIV in apsc mode would make compromise the 24-105 for the 95mm focal lenght loss.

Totally agree with your final thought and may I ask in taking family (or a running-around baby for me) photo, which one would be the better choice? I'm now considering to switch from my 24-105 to 28-200 which might a more handy and versatile choice. Having my 24-105 now, and good to use in terms of focusing speed on A7RIV outdoor. However at indoor condition, my 24-105 losses quite a lot of focusing speed and accuracy and I guess 28-200 performs similarly. So would you prefer switching to 28-200 which the 28-200 may still provides enough focus speed to face-track the running baby outdoor? Thank you.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching to the end and sharing, Tai Man! Yes, I'd switch over to 28-200 for the extra reach especially with a running baby outdoors! Treasure every moment with your baby! Stay well.

@taimanchan2650

3 жыл бұрын

@@Tech4Baba Thanks for your recommendation. I would probably get the 28-200 and see which one suits me.

@taimanchan2650

3 жыл бұрын

@@Tech4Baba Finally I've got the 28-200. To compare both 24-105 and 28-200 on my A7RIV body, both lenses are very sharp to me. 24-105 has a relatively promising focus speed and accuracy, but 28-200 is still good enough if not shooting children. 28-200 is exceptionally sharp when shooting macro or animals, and Bokeh is good for me too. However, I found 28-200 loss so much detail when shooting red/magenta flowers, I'm not sure if this is problems of my setting or related to the lens. To conclude, I intend to keep 24-105 instead of 28-200 because of the focus speed, and will probably get another tele-lens for macro and animals shooting. Thank you for your suggestion!

Great video. That 28-200 is looking more and more enticing to me every day. My GAS is acting up again.

@Tech4Baba

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching and letting me know, patrickmckeag3215! Oh, I know that feeling very well. Let me know how you like the lens when you give in to it! :-)

I have the 24-105 but will be picking this one up as well as 105 sometimes feels limiting.

@Tech4Baba

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, it's great to have the extra reach! Thanks for watching and sharing, Arthur! Happy New Year!

Great video. My Tamron 28-200 is always on my camera or at least in my bag. If my Tammy isn't on my camera my Sigma 100-400 is.

@Tech4Baba

2 жыл бұрын

Glad to hear. Thanks for watching and sharing, Jessica!

Agree with everything, but PRICE DIFF IS HUGE. Yeah 24-28 mm looks small, but diff is SUBSTANTIAL in LANDSCAPE photography. In my Experience Sharpness and Image quality is equally good as Sony. I can buy a Tamron or viltrox ultra wide F1.8 for 300 bucks. Nice video bro.

Thanks for the review and nice closing thoughts. I am yet to commit myself, so I can only pixel peep :). Would like to know whether having OSS in the lens gave 24-105 a clear advantage when it comes to video?

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and the nice comment, Raj! Glad you stayed til my closing thoughts. Yes, OSS is certainly an advantage 24-105 has for video (for photos, too). Good luck with your decision! Stay safe.

Let me know your view for using this lense in a camera without an IBIS. I am looking for a zoom lense for my 6400. I am an amateur and need you suggestion for this Tamron piece while comparing with sony 24-240.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Good question. Without IBIS, it'd be harder to control shakes on the long 200mm end. Sony 24-240 has the advantage of OSS. Thanks for watching, Ayan!

Do you feel like the 28-200 could be used professionally for events if you already have primes like a 135 1.8 and 85 1.8? Considering replacing my older A Mount 24-70 2.8 ZA with this

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

I think it can for outdoor events but will struggle in lowlight/indoors on the longer end (where your 135 and 85 primes can cover). You may want to also consider Tamron 28-75 2.8 as a replacement if you haven't already done so. Thanks for watching, Jake! Stay safe.

@IZabinska

2 жыл бұрын

​@@Tech4Baba Hi! May I ask for suggestion? I am event photographer and I currently have Sony bodies A72 and A73, but A73 being my main body and I have Tamron 28-75 2.8mm which so far has done well, but I have reached the point that I really need that larger zoom, also because I travel and do a lot of hiking, I often find that 28-75mm is just not reaching enough. 28-200mm sounds like a great option for both-travelling and event photography. I am considering to sell my Tamron 28-75 2.8mm and get one prime lens for low light with F1.4 of F1.8 instead and therefore I can use both camera bodies. Any suggestions on prime lens for Sony in around 600$? And then main main working gear would be A73 + Tamron 28-200mm? Do you think that would be good set up? I really appreciate any advice. I have researched many forums and I am still confused what to get. Thanks!

I would like more about comparing picture quality

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching and the good suggestion, Alex! Stay safe.

@bioliv1

3 жыл бұрын

Last table: sonyalpha.blog/2020/07/08/tamron-28-200mm-f2-8-f5-6-di-iii-rxd/

Very good video. Your dilemma is well justified. If you can afford it maybe stay with the Sony and also with the Tamron 17-28 and you may never need anything else ( personally I am getting the TTartisan 11mm and otherwise am considering (although they are not the same category) either the Tamron 17-28 or Sony 24-105 for my everything lens...???

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Glad to hear. Thanks for watching and letting me know, petvesta! Stay safe.

Great video, Thank you! I currently have the Sony 24-105. It is a really good lens, but it isn’t really perfect for my two uses: travel and indoor family gatherings and events. i am thinking of selling it and buying two lenses in its place. The first is the Tamron 28-200 for hiking and travel. Then i am thinking of buying the Sigma 24-70 f2.8 for indoors, family gatherings and events. Does that make sense to you?

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Glad to hear. Thanks for watching and letting me know, Matthew. Yes, it makes sense. I think Sigma 24-70 is a great lens for indoors and family gatherings. It is quite heavy so not as portable but a great lens. I share my thoughts on it here if you're interested, kzread.info/dash/bejne/Y4GbtNt9lKjYqqw.html.

@DesignWarriors

2 жыл бұрын

I have the 24-105 as well and I’m thinking exactly the same thing. Have you made the change yet? I’d be interested to know what you got. Buying both will be quite expensive. I want the quality of the sigma 24-70 but the versatility of the 24-200. Cheers

@matthewbeizer7241

2 жыл бұрын

@@DesignWarriors Yes I bought both lenses and I am very pleased with both. I would say the Tamron is shockingly good. The Tamron’s IQ on my a7iii is just as good as the 24-105 and I love the weight, versatility and color rendition. The Sigma is excellent too although I find I’m using it most in low light situations and for portraits. If you are unsure, I would recommend starting with the Tamron. It is the best $729 I ever spent on a lens.

@DesignWarriors

2 жыл бұрын

@@matthewbeizer7241 thank you so much for coming back so quickly and your advice. i will probably do that and try the tamron first. i'm also thinking of pairing it up with the 17-28. cheers

Which one is better quality and better focus between those 2 lens ?

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

PQ and focus are great on both. To me, Tamron is just a bit sharper in the center and 24-105 is sharper on the edges at various focal length. Thanks for watching, Michael! Stay safe and Happy New Year!

I just bought both Tamrons 17-28mm and 28-20mm, having the wide angle in my backpack is not an issue, the range 17-200 is more than enough, the f/2.8 range from 17 to 35mm is great for lowlight, the lack of image stabilizer over 100mm is best with a tripod if you need best sharpness. Should you use Sony lenses like the 16-35mm and 24-105mm, you do not get everything and the price is another level. I am not professional, yet searching for great pictures. What do you think?

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. Thanks for watching and sharing, One common guy! Tamron 17-28mm and 28-200mm is a great combo (and much cheaper). If you'd like an upgrade on the telephoto end, Tamron 70-180mm is a great lens to check out. If you haven't, you can see my thoughts on it here, kzread.info/dash/bejne/k21mx6ihZK21eLA.html. Stay well!

For landscape photography I'd prefer the 28-200. If I need to go wider I doubt that 24mm would be enough anyway. In most situations I would solve the problem simply by creating a panorama and go as wide as I need.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, good point on using panorama to go wider as needed. Thanks for watching and sharing, edc! Stay safe.

If 105mm it is at f4.5 and above. Do u think it is best to get 28-200 or 24-105mm as a longer standard lens for event photography

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching wantplaces555! If a longer zoom is what you are looking for, between 28-200 and 24-105, I'd consider 28-200 for its extra reach. Better yet, Tamron 70-180mm would be a great constant F/2.8 lens for events. You can check out my thought on it here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/k21mx6ihZK21eLA.html.

Now, sony 24-105 is on sale for $850. Will you recommendation for sony 24-105 over tameron 28-200?

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Wow, that's a great price for Sony 24-105. Makes it an even harder decision. I think it comes down to whether 24mm or 200mm is more important to you. Thanks for watching, Yiduo! Stay safe.

@zhanyiduo

3 жыл бұрын

@@Tech4Baba thanks for you reply. The only concern about is the stabilization at 200mm. Are you able hand held shooting at 200mm?

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

@Yiduo Zhan YW. Yes, it's not too bad for photos since recent Sony cameras have IBIS. It's a bit more challenging with videos.

@CC-gt3ro

3 жыл бұрын

Where did you find the Sony 24-105 at this price? Î’ve never seen it at less than 1140$ US dollars (1520$ Can + taxes)

I own both and the quality of the sony is noticeably better but cary the tamron for days out with the family

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, All Cars United! Same here, I still have my Sony too since it's such a good lens. I find myself using it as a reference for lenses. 😄 I'm about to post a video on my thoughts about it and the Sigma 24-70. Stay safe.

@lindakincaid4530

3 жыл бұрын

I have the Sony 24-105 and was wondering if I should get the 28-200 for our trip out west. I do find my 24-105 with sony 7iii heavy to hike with. I also have a nex 7 which is super light weight after carrying around the sony 7iii. I just love all my options on the soney 7iii

@AllCarsUnited

3 жыл бұрын

@@lindakincaid4530 i ended up selling the 24 105 The extra 95 mm were the determining factor

Which camera better for photography nikon z50 vs nikon 7500 ???

It does stay f/4.4 till 100mm?

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

It stays at F/4.5 until about 115mm! Thanks for watching, Amit! Stay safe and Happy New Year!

Ive got those tamrons. It’s fantastic I’m interested in the 28-200. Great review. Great decision. I would go with the 28-200. It’s about the moment and the kids not the 4mm.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and your kind words, JenniferH! Good choice. Have a great time cherishing and capturing the precious moments with the kids. Stay well!

NO COMPARISON PHOTOS????? C'MON!!!!

i have both and keep both

@Tech4Baba

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, Solange! I still have both, too! Happy New Year!

At the price of Sony 24-105 G you get Tamron 28 200 & Samyang AF 18 f2.8

@Tech4Baba

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, Tamron 28200 is great deal! Is that the combo you have? Thanks for watching and sharing, Amit! Stay well.

I really can not get why Tamron do not include oss, Since the a mount times they are doing the same, just charge 100 bucks more, still cheaper than a sony option and people will not have a second thought at all.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

It'd be great if Tamron adds OSS. In addition to extra cost, it will likely make the lens bigger/heavier though. Thanks for watching and sharing, Gustavo! Stay safe.

@charruaporelmundo

3 жыл бұрын

@@Tech4Baba Maybe but I really do not think so, the a mount lenses, canikon were with oss Sony a mount not, the exactly same lens and they were even more expensive that their counterpart canikon .

@TheAlbintube

3 жыл бұрын

The photos that you have at the end around 8:00 - which lens is it from? Tamron or Sony?

With 24-105 you can crop in APC modus. With 28-200 You can not go to 24. A much better lens would be 20-150.

I already have the tamron 17-28 f2.8 fantastic lens. Now between sony 24-105 and tamron 28-200 it is very difficult to choose. The sony has stabilization and 24mm and slightly better autofocus which make it better in low light and great color and it is a Sony lens. The Tamron has 2.8 at 28, is more lightweight without the stabilization and have 200mm and longer warranty and is far less expensive. Very difficult to pick. You can add the tamron 70-300 very affordable and good telephoto to the 24-105 but now you have 2 lens to switch but even farther focal range at 300mm . However it cost a lot of money to buy 2 lenses instead of the 28-200. Because i have the 17-28 the 28-200 would make sense. Until Tamron create a good 28-300 f2.8-6.3 in the futur..why not?

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, C C! It is indeed a difficult choice between the two. Good thing is you can't really go wrong with either one. :-) Stay safe.

28-200 makes more sense to me

These days you can get a new 24-105 4 for 900 € and a 28-200 2.8-5.6 for 750 € ... much more difficult decision.

I choose 24-105 f4 because low light and better quality ....

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, Michael! Both great lenses in their own right. Happy shooting! Stay safe.

Why have u named tech4baba, what does that mean.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and asking, Souvik! Baba means father in Chinese so Tech4Baba = Tech for a Father like me. Stay safe!

Interesting video. It looks like you are comparing apples to oranges. Both good fruits but very different. Personally, I can't give up IQ and 4mm more on the wide end, if you have ever overlapped a 24mm on top a 28mm exact composition image you'll see how significant it is. As to the loss of one full stop from f/2.8 to f/4, modern lens design, camera IBIS+OSS and ISO make up for it; and f/2.8 Bokeh is not that good and very comparable to f/4. Finally, the extra reach is worthless to me if the images are going to be average at best. I don't disagree with your final thoughts and I also believe that making memories are more important, however, why not strive to make those memories with quality? It's not about pixel peeping, it's simply about creating quality memories. BTW, the 24-70mm is #1,049.00 at the moment. If you can afford the native lens it will always be better. I forgot to mention that the Sony lens is weatherproof (moisture, dust) and shock resistant.

@Tech4Baba

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and sharing, Valentin! Yes, striving to make memories with the best quality possible. Stay well!