Awesome review and great sample images. Thank you!

@DavidOastler

20 күн бұрын

Thanks

This is an awesome, comprehensive review! Thank you!

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Jordan

Thanks David for your thorough review, and Happy Birthday.

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks

Thank for the comments will looking forward to get one.

Great review David! I'm going to order this for travel for my A7siii. Imagine the range with clear image zoom! The versatility with the 2.8 and close focusing at the wide end to telephoto range without a huge sacrifice in quality is amazing! This would even work well on a gimbal for interesting compressed shots. Also going to pick up the Sony 24mm f1.4 for gimbal, low light, and astrophotography. Good times to be a Sony user!

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

It sure is a great time

Appreciate your frank and honest reviews. You help make the often difficult purchasing decision easier. Love the new Tamrons for Sony. Hope they have some long telephotos coming soon.

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

Appreciate the review!

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks

Good David, thankyou

Thank you very much for this great review! 👍 Best regards from Germany!

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks

I love the model

Great review 👍

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks

Thank you

Great review, this lens is going to be popular. The typical 24-200 (ish) lenses always start at f3.5 or f4, but this one starting at f2.8 is a game changer, as you could handle low light as well, at 28mm, without having to switch to another lens. Also I believe it reaches 70mm at f4, which is also nice.

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

I agree it’s a great lens especially for the price.

Thanks. Looks great. I had the Sony 24- 240 which I virtually used all the time but sold it in favour of the Tamron 28 - 75 mostly because it was so much lighter.......which is why I would go for this lens. Always looking for lighter lenses. The only thing that bothers me a bit is the onion bokeh which I have seen on other reviews.

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

I quite like the look of the bokeh but we all like different things.

Thank you for using it with the a6400 that is what I have, and what I had questions about.

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

Great review. Thanks so much for including an A6400 in it. I'm looking for a good travel zoom for my A6600. As I've become more proficient in photography over the years, I'm finding my old Sony 18-200 LE from my NEX-5r days has some serious shortcomings (particularly in lower light). I'm currently up in the air between this Tamron (I like the faster speed at longer focal lengths for this), a Sony 24-240 (I like that it goes wider and has a longer zoom but I'm not sure if I'll see much improvement over my 18-200 with it), and the Sony 18-135 (lightest and widest option of the bunch, but the aperture slows down pretty quickly). I'll use it for mostly family style pics (mostly outdoors) when we travel or at family gatherings - I'm already covered with shorter range with my Sony 16-50 2.8 (old, adapted A mount SSM lens that works great), otherwise I would probably skip the long zoom and be looking at the Tamron 28-75. Any thoughts as to which of these three zooms I'm considering might work best (Tamron 28-200, Sony 24-240, or Sony 18-135)?

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

I would get the Tamron for sure

@mikecamdawg

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the reply David. I think that's what I'm going to do.

wow, I was about to buy the 100-200mm F4. Thanks!

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

Just looked on Amazon USA.$729 not a bad price might have to get one. Thanks for the review David.

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

It’s great for the price thanks for watching

Awesome objective review...nicely done! I just subscribed my friend! 👍🏾😊

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for joining us

@dereck_MT360

3 жыл бұрын

David Oastler I went ahead and picked one up btw...😁

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

Very cool

Thanks David, appreciate the review. Do you think you would still have situations where you would reach for your 28-75 or do you feel this could completely replace that lense?

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

No I love the 28-75mm

looks like another winner for Tamron

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks yes I agree Gilbert

Tamron completed their Ultimate Trinity Zoom Lens then they release their most versatile Lens in the market for just 799 $. Travel, hobbyist, casual run and gun shooters and even professional shooters who wants to go light are rejoicing for going full frame. Definitely, the most affordable lens for an excellent top notch quality. Can't wait for whats lens are coming from Tamron. I won't wonder if Sony FF camera market now will hit the roof once again more due to this step up marketing by Tamron and other non native lens creators. Great job.

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much for watching

Very nice and thorough review! This will make an exceptional travel lens. Do you think Tamron will come out with a 180-400mm lens? It would fill out my landscape group which includes the Tamron Holy Trinity. Thanks in advance!

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Who knows I’m sure more lenses will come

Hi David Great review as always. Can you describe how is this lens compared to Sony 24-105? I've also noticed some purple flinging on a fiew bright lit scenes in a sample images. Can you please comment on this too?

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

I did not notice any flagging I think the quality is comparable to the 24-105mm for the price its great but perhaps test it to make sure it fits your needs.

You David and Dustin Abbott have sold me on this lens. A7c got the improved focus system I believe. ATB.

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

It’s a great lens

Thanks for video. which one you would choose Tamron 28 75 or Tamron 28 200 ? Considering you already have 35 & 85 mm prime lenses but you want good quality zoom lens

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

Definitely the for me the 28-75.

Grabbing this even though I have the 24-105. I find the long range limited at times on that lens. Interesting you did not see purple fringing on your copy as this has been highlighted by other reviewers as the only weakness of this lens.

@DavidOastler

2 жыл бұрын

Yes there might be slight variations

Hi would you recomend it for the a6400 as an upgrade of the kit lens? Or would you recomend an other one? This one with the sigma 16mm? Only for photography, or should I go for one with oss?

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Yes I would but you would still need a wide lens like the Sigma 16mm

Wonderful review! Excellent! Please sir, one question. I have the A73 with the kit lens 28-70 FE 3.5-5.6. I want zoom lens because I find all zoom lens really easy for me. My question sir is if i install this 28-200, you believe that may i see some improvement in sharpness compare with the kit lens? I searched all over the KZread and haven't find any video to compare with the kit lens so i really wondering.

@DavidOastler

2 жыл бұрын

Yes it’s much better

@G.Menounos

2 жыл бұрын

@@DavidOastler Thank you sir

I think this new 28-200mm will replace my 28-75mm f2.8! When traveling I usually shoot at f3-5 anyway. However at night is my concern. Great, now I have to bring both?

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Yes it’s a great option.

Impressive how it compare with the aony 70-200 f4!🤪. About min 20:40, maybe I’m mistaken but it is not about sharpness but about Dimensionality. I hear about that concept from another youtube channel, will try to link you.

@charruaporelmundo

4 жыл бұрын

Check this, he has very interesting material .kzread.info/dash/bejne/anWmxbydaamogaQ.html

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing

Please advise how the image quality compares to the Sony 24-105 f4

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

I believe it’s comparable

Can you test and see what the max FPS this lens achieves on continuous hi on the A9? No reviewer seems to cover this aspect and some people anecdotally state that the tamron only gets 10fps while others state that it's comparable to the sony 24-240 (15fps)

@DavidOastler

Жыл бұрын

It’s 10fps and 20fps on manual focus.

How are campared this 28-200 with tamron 70-180 in regarding sharpness and autofocus ?

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

The 70-180 is sharper and the autofocus is about the same.

I am planning to buy this lens for to pair with Sony a7 iv for my upcoming trip down on Great Ocean Rd. Just wondering did your pictures taken near Lorne? Just like explore and take some shots in that reagon.

@DavidOastler

Жыл бұрын

Yes it was not far from lorne it’s a beautiful drive

@freebot10

Жыл бұрын

Thank you David.

Thanks for a great review in an Aussie accent! How does the image quality compare with the Sony 24-105?

@robertalexmatevish6111

4 жыл бұрын

Check out Dustin Abott's review dustinabbott.net/2020/06/tamron-28-200mm-f2-8-5-6-rxd-a071-review/ for comparison shots. The Tamron looks to be heads and shoulders better than the Sony.

@CC-gt3ro

2 жыл бұрын

@@robertalexmatevish6111 are you sure you don’t compare to 24-240. The 24-105 has really good picture quality and color contrast and stabilization which improve in video. The 28-200 is NOT head and shoulder above the 24-105. You are completely wrong.

@robertalexmatevish6111

2 жыл бұрын

@@CC-gt3ro Ah, I did mean the 24-240, though "completely wrong" is a bit strong: the 24-105 isn't really comparable as it's got far less reach, a stop less of light, has in-lens AF and costs about twice as much. If you're looking for spectacular bokeh or to pixel peep in the corners, both lens are sub-par, but if you're looking for a walk-around lens, there are few reasons to go for the Sony other than name. In dusty environments I guess I'd go for the Sony as it's got an internal zoom?

How are compared 28-200 with tamron 28-75 f2.8 in term sharpness and autofocus ?

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

The 28-75mm is sharper.

How is the image quality compared to the Tamron 28 - 75?

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

It’s very close.

How will the quality drop with APC mode in Sony a7 iii ?

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

You lose mega pixels for apsc is better on the a7riii

Tamron always helping us sony users who are on a tight budget 😁

@NickL0VIN

4 жыл бұрын

J Bello Tammy and Sammy (Samyang) are great. Otherwise no way I could justify spending on GM and Sigma Art lenses. I would’ve been back in the Apsc world if it weren’t for them.

@jbello9398

4 жыл бұрын

@@NickL0VIN you are so right! I have the 35mm and 85mm Samyang for my a7iii... I have only 1 Sony lens 😂😂😂

what do u think about the tamaron 70 to 180?

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

I love that lens

The lack of OSS on the Tamron ain't a problem with the a6400? I have a a6100 and want to buy this lens, but I'm afraid that the photos will come out with motion blur.

@DavidOastler

2 жыл бұрын

It can be if you don’t keep your shutter speed high.

@parito100

2 жыл бұрын

@@DavidOastler at what shutter speed does it start to be noticeable?

@DavidOastler

2 жыл бұрын

I can’t really say as I’m very good at getting sharp images

Finally some brick wall peeping 😂 , Thanks for the video..

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Lol thanks

What if Tamron launches 15-24 f/5 24-105 f/5 100-300 f/5 in size of Sony's APS-C lenses list below: 10-18 16-70 70-350 Those 3 would be perfect for travel even at f5 with A7iii low light performance.

@DavidOastler

3 жыл бұрын

That would be amazing

I'm not an expert but under consideration of the technical specifcation and price only, I feel the sharpness in average is acceptable. Considering my expectations as an ambitious amateur it is quiite far away from the sharpness as I would have. I'm keen to see the difference to the 70-180 f2.8.

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

It was very sharp for a travel lens and the cost.

How's the sharpness compares to the Tamron 70-180

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Very close but the 70-180 is constant 2.8 so hog advantage I’m low light

@henryne

4 жыл бұрын

@@DavidOastler Thanks David. I own the Tamron 28-75 2.8mm lens which I really like. In addition, I want a zoom and thinking about the 70-180 or the new 28-200. Hence my question. BTW, love your shows and Enjoy your Birhtday!

Seems like quality wise it’s as good as 28-75?

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

I was surprised how good it was

Thanks for the review,how is the image quality on A6400?

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

The quality is great

@user-jc1kl7od4f

4 жыл бұрын

@@DavidOastler thank you David

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

It’s terrific

How does it compare to the Sony 24-240?

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

It’s a much better lens.

@allthegear.noidea

4 жыл бұрын

@@DavidOastler thanks

At last, a lens review that does rabbit on about video, and as a bonus your an Aussie too

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Michael

I would not recomend this lens for APS-C, 28-200 becomes 42-300. 42 mm is not wide enough to be realy versatile. The Sony E 18-135 would work better even when it's not great. I own the 16-55 2.8 and the 70-350 which means I have to change lens sometimes.

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

It is great for reach though for wildlife etc

@TVe200

4 жыл бұрын

@@DavidOastler Sure, but it's not working as the one and only lens to take with you.

@OllieHstock

4 жыл бұрын

I've just received mine bought for my holiday to Italy this year. It'll be coupled to my A6500. I find that I need the longer reaches more than the short. For candid shots I use mu phone and inside churches etc I have a 12mm and 16mm primes

@youuuuuuuuuuutube

4 жыл бұрын

@@TVe200 The two lenses you have are obviously much better, probably even ideal, but I'd say 42-300mm for 729 usd is the perfect range and price for soccer moms, and also good for existing owners of a wider lens like the 10-18mm f4 or Tamron 17-28.

@wongc261

4 жыл бұрын

Couple this lens with the Sigma 1.4/16mm DC DN you are good to go

Hi David. Do your neighbours suspiciously watch you running around in front of your camera's? Just kidding

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Lol

noice

@DavidOastler

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks

1st

It's pronounced vin-yetting

@DavidOastler

Жыл бұрын

Lol I don’t care.