Her bruising troubled me and self inflicted stabbing ....how could she have done all of that ....along with the black car and the sock ....definitely room for doubt

This is ridiculous she's guilty lol, mind blowing that a lawyer who is clearly intelligent can say she is innocent after 26 years of working with her.

@DG-kd5bs

11 ай бұрын

The fact that he has no motive to say she’s innocent after all these years proves that he really does believe she didn't do it. There are so many inconsistencies in the case, she is not guilty beyond reasonable doubt but there was definitely foul play involved. I believe she either planned this with her husband, or her husband did it, or her husband paid someone to rob the house and it went wrong. The husband to this day believes that his wife is innocent which shows that he’s either in cahoots with her or feels incredibly guilty that his plans ended this way. It’s not so cut and dry.

@samuelvazquez6762

11 ай бұрын

She’s innocent man it was the husband

@Aliunderthesky

11 ай бұрын

She’s extremely guilty!

@carolyn7059

8 ай бұрын

@@DG-kd5bs Well, he is representing Darlie. What would happen if he said “Darlie is guilty.” I would imagine that would not go over well. Darin accused darlie on the 911 call. I have a feeling that he supports her for some reason other than believing she is innocent.

@carolyn7059

8 ай бұрын

@@samuelvazquez6762 What evidence is there against Darin?

Susanna, you obviously saw the video. She wasnt dancing on the graves, it just goes to show how they twisted it. I'm not saying shes innocent, but to blatantly lie

How can she sit there and say that she didn't do it, what nerves Darlie has

The fingerprint, the only one of the hundreds they found that isn’t 100% identified, doesn’t have enough points to be identified beyond a doubt. But, Darlie does match the identified points of the print. It’s her’s. No one else was in that house. As far as motive, who the hell would have a motive to murder two little boys sleeping in their house? One that makes any sense? Why did Darlie do this? Who knows? But she absolutely did.

@Canuckchick32

8 ай бұрын

I agree! She's an evil cold-blooded murderess WHO killed her own sons! 😤😡

@carolyn7059

8 ай бұрын

You are absolutely correct. What has been identified has not come back in Darlie’s favor, and the fingerprint is Darlie’s. It has not been 100% proven, but it is close enough to 100% for me to say it with certainty. Also, in 2015, it was analyzed for male dna only, and none was found.

@sashagirl1987

4 ай бұрын

@@carolyn7059BUT female dna WAS found on that print!!!! Darlie was the ONLY female in that house that night!!!! And they said the print had to be either a small female or a small child! It’s 100% DARLIES print!!!!! But it’s THE ONLY THING her side can HOPE to hold onto to put off justice!!!!

So many mysteries. Would love the whole truth and why.

I would hate to have innocent on death row, even in prison, but this woman still saying innocent seems far fetched. I guess at this point why own it? Who would want to admit to this atrocious crime? Just seems unbelievable someone came in and killed babies. Husband never saw anyone. Lots of bad people in the world but even they hardly ever kill children. Strangers. Family members do on occasion. She did have more injuries than made to believe by state. IDK such a crazy story. And what she says on the 911 call seems suspect.

@carolyn7059

8 ай бұрын

Will you explain what you mean by “she did have more injuries than made to believe by the state”? As far as I am aware all of Darlie’s real injuries were photographed as evidence and mentioned in the trial transcripts. But, I believe darlie did it, and will never take responsibility. Also, the 911 call shows signs of deception according to experts. It is a very bizarre 911 call in many ways.

How did she get those bruises on her arms?

They won’t kill her that’s for sure, she did it an I believe Darien stabbed her an planted the sock, he was so obsessed with Darlie an would do anything for her. Seems he loved her more then the kids.

I think she did it and her husband took the sock away from the house not knowing if she was guilty or not. She didn't help with her children who were passing away, she tended to her own wounds... Very Diane Downs of her...

@carolyn7059

3 ай бұрын

Why do you think Darin took the sock away instead of Darlie?

@jooliagoolia9959

3 ай бұрын

@@carolyn7059 Because there wasn't time for her to take it to that location according to the police....

@carolyn7059

3 ай бұрын

@@jooliagoolia9959 When and where did the police say that darlie did not have time to take the sock? How was that determined? Keep in mind, there is no real timeline. A timeline needs a start and end point and no can provide either. Also, keep in mind that Darin has never been charged as an accomplice or for involvement in the murders, so if they could prove he ran the sock, and not darlie, why was he never charged? The sock was found a few houses down, and I am confident she could have left her house to discard the sock, and came back within a minute. There is no timeline.

@jooliagoolia9959

3 ай бұрын

@@carolyn7059 Oh, I agree with you I'm relaying what I saw in one of the many documentaries or podcasts I watched over the years. I don't think her husband is completely innocent, but of what we'll probably never know.

Why didn’t her defense show video of memorial for the boys? Just let small portion be shown if the silly string. It was prejudicial

@Aliunderthesky

11 ай бұрын

How does time sitting sadly by the grave change a damn thing about her spraying her recently dead kids with silly string? It changes nothing! And I couldn’t care less about the silly string. Take it out of the puzzle. Darlie is clearly very guilty.

@carolyn7059

3 ай бұрын

I believe it is because the memorial video did not counteract the silly string video. However, as someone else has already mentioned, it would not change the fact that she did this.

What about the black car?

@carolyn7059

8 ай бұрын

It was never found, and if you look at the location of the sock, I don’t see how the alleged unknown assailant(s) would have been driving.

I don't agree with murder, whoever's doing it. Especially when it's the state who have just spent millions taking someone to court for it. Iys wrong, so wrong that we, erm, are going to commit the same act. Makes no sense at all

I know that attacking someone's character can get ugly and very petty. "Dancing on the grave" type of comment, but a person is found guilty on a simple thing as behaviour pre-crime. Yes, the sock thing can't be explained, but so much blood evidence are very suspicious. The husband is not so honest as wel, found guilty on insurance fraud. Just saying

@kevinmichael8619

15 күн бұрын

Husband was never found guilty of anything.

She has defintley hit the wall.

Death penalty is a shame to man kind. It throws a dark shadow over those of us who think life should have a meaning. It´s so low and shamefull that it makes me wonder how "ordinary" people are raised it the USA - since it travels through generations.

Darlie routier is guilty but she is without doubt mentally ill and should not be on death row, life imprisonment would be more appropriate and treatment for her mental illness should be made available but before this could happen she would have to confess, and perhaps the regression therapy could help her to stop denying and get the help that she needs.

@Test-Tube-Baby-xo8xx

29 күн бұрын

She's not mentally ill, she's a psychopath.