Next, we need to repeal the Patriot Act.

@mark_morse

Ай бұрын

I could not agree more. The patriot act has become a tool for the intelligence agencies to target civilians based on political ideology and affiliation.

@brandonborgerding182

Ай бұрын

That would hurt the corporations not help them

@user-mb8qi3ky5q

Ай бұрын

@@brandonborgerding182 yep.

@jim0311

Ай бұрын

Republicans designed it to stop people like you..be careful what you publicly post.. yes Republicans are out to get people like you

@jamie42172

Ай бұрын

funny for as many reasons as you could think of

Allowing the non elected parts of our government to interpret rules by the selves is scary.

@Aladhard

Ай бұрын

Ignoring the fact the elected people elect the heads of the agencies. Also ignoring the fact a major party is trying to make them into a puppet in the next election. Also would you rather have uneducated yes men on emissions problem create rules? Or rule on regulations on how much wild fish you are allowed to catch? Or how to protect endangered species?

@user-zu5do6ri6r

Ай бұрын

It's already been happening for years. This just makes it official.

@jamie42172

Ай бұрын

@@user-zu5do6ri6r and repealed

@yusteryumeister4601

Ай бұрын

This does the opposite? It prevents government agencies from interpreting vague legislation?

@dilaisy_loone2846

Ай бұрын

@@yusteryumeister4601 Wich just means that none experts will be interpreting laws. Wich is incredibly dumb

The Fed should be stripped of any and all power. The Fed should also be audited so we can see how they've wasted our money over the decades.

@benfaunce7496

Ай бұрын

One or the other. Lets not waste even more.

@lsmitty8839

Ай бұрын

The fed is illegal !!!

@AminaPhilosophy

28 күн бұрын

You can already see what they’re wasting money on in real time…war.

@angelainamarie9656

27 күн бұрын

No. Six crooked Supreme Court justices are NOT my government.

@evelynramos9275

13 күн бұрын

We know where the money went!! Straight into their pockets!! Thank God the corruption is ending.

It doesn't weaken their ability, it takes it away from them.

@ethgod

Ай бұрын

good

@ralphsawyer9535

Ай бұрын

@@ethgod 🍻

@pmurnion

Ай бұрын

Correct, and whats hilarious is the morons here cheering on the destruction of government. They actually want the America of the Walking Dead. Funny thing is, as a progressive European, the America of the walking dead suits me fine too 😂

Federal agencies should not have the power to interpret laws. The Supreme Court made the right call.

@angelainamarie9656

27 күн бұрын

I want experts implementing things, not politicians. This is a prelude to a soviet-style govenment where someone's friend is given the job because they're powerful, not because they know what they're doing. We're about to have a world ruled over by crooks and clowns.

@angelainamarie9656

27 күн бұрын

So to be clear, you want politicians setting guidelines for things like how much radiation you can be safely exposed to, or how to sanitize your operating room, rather than scientists who know what they're talking about? Instead of saying 'safe for humans' in the law, and having an expert who knows what they're doing determin what's safe, you're going to let Lauren Boebert decide, or Matt Gaetz, or George Santos, they'll be in some committee coming up with how many rads you can safely absorb. Maybe they'll look it up with chatGPT and get a fabricated answer.

Next the NFA, the Patriot act and complete overhaul of our government.

How did it take me 2 days to hear about something this big?

@LowerYourExpectationsPleb

Ай бұрын

the media doesn't like this

@LeniBats

Ай бұрын

Because the media just wants to make a fuss over Ukraine, Israel, and the Battle of the Granddads(Trump/Biden). The media is having a Wag the Dog moment. They're using other stories that don't mean as much to Americans, as a way to divert attention from the bigger, more important events that Americans actually want to know about. Government does this wag the dog stuff all the time.

@_mids

Ай бұрын

They don’t want you to hear about it

Now the ATF is finally gonna stop harassing the public.

@angelainamarie9656

27 күн бұрын

Unlikely.

@itsmrbigsmoke862

26 күн бұрын

Don't get comfortable friend. That's what got us here in the first place. We need to keep fighting until the ATF is completely gone

@angelainamarie9656

26 күн бұрын

@@itsmrbigsmoke862 that will never happen

@itsmrbigsmoke862

26 күн бұрын

@@angelainamarie9656 with that attitude, of course it won't

I’m happy that the ATF is now unhappy!

@interstellarsurfer

Ай бұрын

Not just the ATF - the whole administrative branch is affected.

@Jake-mv7yo

Ай бұрын

Will you be happy when we are in a new gilded age? Are you rich enough you don't need to work for a living?

@markmurrell1894

Ай бұрын

@@Jake-mv7yo I’m comfortable. No debt, I make products that the marketplace wants. Took years of hard work to get here. How are you doing?

@guesswhoscoming9046

Ай бұрын

@@Jake-mv7yo Yes and yes. Regardless, if they want to restrict my rights they can at least do it with people I can vote out.

@interstellarsurfer

Ай бұрын

@Cloudguy5673 I meant Executive - but yeah, basically. 😂

This will be the most influential ruling in our lifetime

@Martha-jl6eu

Ай бұрын

This ruling is a big deal, and I am afraid of it.

@aaronjohnston1584

Ай бұрын

@Martha-jl6eu Why? It simply prevents faceless bureaucrats from inventing laws not voted on and passed by people we elect to vote and pass laws. Chevron allowed career federal employees to circumvent the Legislative, tExecutive and Judicial branches of government. It was BAD law.

@Martha-jl6eu

Ай бұрын

@@aaronjohnston1584 That "bad law" was held up for decades. Instead of experts determining rules, it's the courts. The courts are made up of appointed judges who have no expertise in thousands of areas. It was a power grab by the supreme court, a power grab for the federal courts, and gives the president wayyyy too much power. Not to mention the new and innovative ways to bribe judges. This is a bad decision.

@benfaunce7496

Ай бұрын

​@@Martha-jl6euyou like fascism?

@undertow5164

Ай бұрын

100%. Trump's legacy on the SC is amazing for freedom

Big win! Unelected Adminitrative state loosing it's power over citizens and businesses.

We investigated ourselves and found we did no wrong. That is the Chevron Doctrine in a nutshell.

No, it stops agencies from using "their interpretations" of THE LAW!!!

@jamesricker3997

Ай бұрын

We both know it is a direct assault on free market capitalism. Obey the party and you are free to do what you want.Oppose the party and you're suddenly find the courts making you subject to regulations. This is the first step in making business subservient to the state.

@EyePatchGuy88

Ай бұрын

​@jamesricker3997 The Chevron Doctrine allowed lower level government organisation's the ability to interpret vague laws as they saw fit. To my understanding, it won't attack businesses.

@Timorias

Ай бұрын

This won’t make businesses anywhere close to “subservient” it just means less people they have to bribe. Instead of professionals who literally spend their lives studying a topic like what counts as “clean” drinking water, you can have a judge with no experience on the topic deciding that instead. Now Aquafina can simply pay off the same judges who just overturned this ruling. Oh and they also just ruled that judicial bribery is legal.

@benreiter7218

Ай бұрын

@@TimoriasI wish this comment and narrative was seen more by the uneducated self righteous people who are talking about how this is a great thing and congress now has to “do its job.” I’m open to any take other than “we’re doomed.”

@zachforbes3901

Ай бұрын

​@@jamesricker3997that's not true at all, whoever told you that is absolutely clueless and has their head up their ass

Best option, get rid of all regulations that came out since 84.

Congress has to do their job, not to let bureaucrats make up their own laws.

Not to "interpret" but to pervert the law to suit their agenda. The government should never be allowed to pervert the law without checks and balances.

They are all grey areas. That's why the scotus is saving us

It’s gonna be great time for lawyers

@sues3218

Ай бұрын

I can see the commercials now. LOL

@AlsadsajsAlsadsajs-vl7th

28 күн бұрын

They will be the only winners in the end

YAY, about time this happened. Regulatory agencies should have never been allowed to make regulations to have the same effect as law.

Way past time! BIG government power needs trimming. A constitutional win!

Good! Now if you can't pass the law in congress you can't pass the law.

Good! The regulatory agencies are an arm of the Executive branch who should not ever be allowed to legislate. The process is intended to be slow and now these agencies must stay within the law as it has been passed in Congress. This stops the executive from turning law abiding citizens into felons overnight with no oversight! Big win for ALL Americans!

This is a massive win for Americans.

Big blow to the administrative state…. And a huge win for freedom!

@behindthacrookedcross

Ай бұрын

Spoken like a white guy

@ThatOpalGuy

Ай бұрын

@@behindthacrookedcross forgot the 'rich' adjective.

@tat2zz68

Ай бұрын

​@@behindthacrookedcross quiet down racist.

@a.jdeets5527

Ай бұрын

All it does is give lobbyists and corporations even more power to buy our government.

@ATrane-1842

Ай бұрын

​@@behindthacrookedcrossyou butt hurt??

Maybe 40 years ago when the best and brightest were appointed and it made sense to divert to them. But that isn’t what we have today. Instead we mostly have people who are appointed that have never worked in the real world. Lately it’s been a DEI leadership component that eliminates people that are better because they don’t check a box. The left criticizes multiple laws/rules written many years ago, but now when one they like is challenged because it is outdated, can’t have that. Until there is some bipartisan consensus this is the best thing to happen. And it works both ways. It’s not like it doesn’t apply to conservatives. The left doesn’t like it because they made it partisan years ago sneaking in activists funded by special interest and now that will effectively end since they just had their teeth pulled.

@angelalewis3645

Ай бұрын

Right! Well said!

@WillyWillerton

Ай бұрын

I'm in total agreement with you.

They finally removed the democrats from their sphinxter.

To prevent any branch of government becoming too powerful, powers were separated: Congress writes laws, the Executive branch approves them, and the Supreme Court interprets laws. In 1984 the Supreme Court (with three Justices absent) wrote a decision known as the "Chevron decision", which combined all powers under the Executive branch. The President and his staff now had authority to write laws and interpret them, without the other branches of government. Today's Supreme Court decision weakens the Chevron decision, which helps to restore the separation of powers.

@kevinagee5085

Ай бұрын

Hahahahahahahha

@0doubledseven589

Ай бұрын

Bring back Civics in school.

@dylanthompson1029

Ай бұрын

Bad brains you have there

@201remipes7

Ай бұрын

God bless this supreme court

@Darkmattermonkey77

Ай бұрын

Funny thing. I graduated high school in 1996, I have never heard of this SCOTUS ruling? It could have something to do with going to school in California 🤔

This is the 1st time I have ever given CNBC a 👍

@rachelt2010

Ай бұрын

One other time for me, when Jim had to eat his words…😂

@thatlittlevoice6354

Ай бұрын

Why? They didn't overturn it.

@tat2zz68

Ай бұрын

​@@thatlittlevoice6354 go away troll

@Gonzo.S.Thompson

Ай бұрын

I like the ruling but I don't like them or their politics. So I don't give them a thumbs up, I just listened and then move on.

@Gonzo.S.Thompson

Ай бұрын

​@@tat2zz68how are they a troll?

Interpretation: Our tyrannical dictatorship just got pushed back a little.

Just abolish all ABC agencies

@silverstem2964

Ай бұрын

The FDA? Do you care about food safety? Let's stop inspecting meat, great idea!

@AntiNeocons

Ай бұрын

@@silverstem2964 Yes, that's why I want to abolish the criminal FDA

@SlyFan-mp8dc

Ай бұрын

@@silverstem2964The same FDA that allows our food to be pumped full of questionable ingredients that are banned in most countries?

@ThatOpalGuy

Ай бұрын

start with the RNC

@a.jdeets5527

Ай бұрын

Why not abolish the government all together then?

Good! I agree with Gorsuch that if a law is ambiguous, toss the law and tell Congress to write a succinct and clear law.

@mikefowler301

Ай бұрын

YES SIR! it is. No more mud puddles being wet lands and destroying peoples lives, just one example. or a ditch being navigable water ways due to heavy rain. Or a arm brace making a pistol a long rifle, jeebus those bureaucrats went nuts with chevron now hopefully it's over.

@mnguardianfan7128

Ай бұрын

Laws will NEVER be able to keep up with changing times. Experts are far better at pointing things in the best direction.

@LawAdNauseam

Ай бұрын

@@mnguardianfan7128experts should be consulted during the drafting of legislation. Not allowed to do whatever they want with it afterwards

@mnguardianfan7128

Ай бұрын

@@LawAdNauseam Laws are WAY too slow. Congress just isn't able to update laws effectively or in a timely manner. Brute politics will overwhelm needed changes. This is a HORRIBLE decision.

@LawAdNauseam

Ай бұрын

@@mnguardianfan7128 horrible for the administrative state and faceless bureaucracy😂

This is a good thing, The agencies that laws give power to, can not fairly regulate their own power. They should not be the ones who determine what the laws says.

😂😂😂😂 poor atf

@donrichter3523

Ай бұрын

ATF should be a convenience store, not a federal agency.

The capitol is public property there was not tress passing During the Vietnam war people used to handcuff themself to the pillars and all kinds if protests Is not insurrection if you don’t have guns

@angelalewis3645

Ай бұрын

Yes!

@rickyodom1201

Ай бұрын

but people didn't break windows and these people had guns and bombs that not sight seeing trip s plane riot is not sight seeing trip

Hahaha screw the ATF

@jamesricker3997

Ай бұрын

​@Cloudguy5673Project 2025 would defund multiple law enforcement agencies , but not the ATF. Republicans are going to need someone to take away your guns.

@ralphsawyer9535

Ай бұрын

BLM has been running amok, too.

There are 438 federal agencies and sub agencies that have had the power (until now) to layer on "regulations" that are essentially laws not passed by Congress. Executive Branch overreach has been out of control for many years. This will open up many challenges and will hopefully eliminate many of these regulations. Example: The ATF's "rules" that try to restrict our 2nd Amendment rights.

@edbenti5007

Ай бұрын

The Chevron Doctrine was created by a Republican majority Supreme Court in 1984. You are literally cheering the remaking of the USA into a 3rd world plutocracy. The Republican judges of 1984 understood that expert government professionals had a likely safer interpretation of regulation than the corporations who gave us Love Canal, choking air pollution, contaminated food and water, unsafe medicine etc. 7 Republicans on the 1984 court. The Roberts court is fascist.

So, the people we can fire have to make the laws and not some government employee that can change the law based on their personal politics or whoever is currently in power. Seems like a really good thing. You have literally hundreds of lawyers in congress if they cannot pass a coherent law maybe it's not needed.

@mikefowler301

Ай бұрын

Totally agree.

@a.jdeets5527

Ай бұрын

And how did we prevent those people from being bought by lobbyists? This only gives corporations even more power to maximize profit with no regulations.

@poisonshelf2037

Ай бұрын

@@a.jdeets5527 The difference is we can vote out the people being bought by lobbyists. The people in the agencies with free reign to do as they pleased under chevron are appointed not voted in, and rarely ever removed from their positions. Maybe if you used some critical thinking you'd be as smart as you think you are.

@garypascucci5797

Ай бұрын

Lawyers are not even supposed to be allowed to be in congress, iirc

@combatepistemologist8382

Ай бұрын

Lawyers do not have the technical expertise to even have a clue about some of the things these agencies protect us from.

Yes! No more rogue agencies and unelected bureaucrats making law on their own!! No more "agency rule = law!"

@eeveedude632

Ай бұрын

Yeah instead lets let 9 decrepit unelected officials decide everything!

@coolbugfacts1234

Ай бұрын

No more rogue agencies like the FDA making drugs safe! No more rogue agencies like the EPA keeping lead out of drinking water! Pure free market capitalism is back. Bribing judges is also legal thanks to the supreme court.

@brentkuehne435

Ай бұрын

🎉

Good. Chevron was one of the biggest drain plugs in the swamp.

@mnguardianfan7128

Ай бұрын

Yeah, who needs experts when you can have lawyers making laws.

@cdbb6157

Ай бұрын

@@mnguardianfan7128 and totally ignorant people determining policy that affects your safety. Yay!

@mark_morse

Ай бұрын

@@mnguardianfan7128 You are correct. New policy makers are needed.

@mnguardianfan7128

Ай бұрын

@@mark_morse Congress members will never be experts

@rad4579

Ай бұрын

@@mnguardianfan7128 regulators are NOT experts.

Weakens? No. Chevron allowed government to ‘always’ get what they wanted if any grey area. Basically they could make up things as they go. We given power to enforce statutes not create new or different meanings.

Good. Federal Agencies have too much power. Too much wiggle room.

@itdies2dayyo

Ай бұрын

You're exactly right. We should be making sure that companies are allowed to cut corners, let's say if it's more cost-effective to let chemicals run in our drinking water instead of investing in better filtration and inspections. We could also make sure that auto companies are allowed the freedom to completely deregulate their emissions, so we can keep leaking dangerous gasses into the air. We should also let food manufacturers decide how much cancer causing microplastics is good enough to be in their products. You're totally right, we should absolutely let the moral corporations decide what's good enough for the rest of us. because after all, it's not like corporations don't have the peoples best interest in heart, historically! You're exactly right!

@ThatOpalGuy

Ай бұрын

@@itdies2dayyo profits over people, as long as the justices get a piece of that pie.

@burntorangehorn

Ай бұрын

Yeah, what business does the federal government have regulating food safety, vehicle safety, or banking standards?

@vincentgiasullo

Ай бұрын

@@itdies2dayyoyou probably believe they don’t pay their “fair share”

@Maelstromme

Ай бұрын

@@vincentgiasulloWhat is your plan to prevent our food from being poisoned, now that the FDA can’t do its job nearly as well?

HUGE win for the 2nd Amendment

@ytmndan

Ай бұрын

Huge win for EVERY amendment.

@PURENT

Ай бұрын

Huge win for increased lead in baby food

@jamietwigg5152

Ай бұрын

@@PURENT Now you're being over dramatic.

@PURENT

Ай бұрын

@@jamietwigg5152 Now you need a congressman to decide how much lead is acceptable in your baby food, and if some lobbyist decides to sprinkle in a couple of thousand dollars for that congressman, you got a vague law which lawyers can abuse in court against you.

@jerryhicks9025

Ай бұрын

Huge win for flammable water. Gotta love that freedom

Age limit 60 years old, Two term limits for the Supreme Court too

@stevebriggs9399

Ай бұрын

Requires two-thirds of both house or two thirds of the states to propose, then three quarters of the states to ratify. Good luck with that.

@ethgod

Ай бұрын

no lol

I got curious and decided to do some reading. Its kinda confusing. So! Chevron gave federal agencies the power to interpret laws when there's a gray area or something is vague. Now, if there's a question, it has to go to court. What was good about Chevron and the agencies making their own decisions when it came to vagueness was that, for the most part, they kinda know the details of what they're doing. The people at the EPA know their beans when it comes to the environment, and so when there's a question about how a law is supposed to be implemented, they can use that knowledge to make an educated decision. The argument against Chevron is that it took power away from the courts, and what I'm seeing in comment sections where people are celebrating its death is that people are glad that things will be decided by 'elected officials'. Im a little worried, our elected officials can be really stupid. I think that everyone can agree on that. I'm fuzzy on if it means judges now are gonna be making rules or if we have to send this all to Congress. From what I'm getting, people less educated on the issues will be making decisions from now on and stuff is gonna slow down. A lot of these agencies deal with regulations, so you'll probably see less of those. Which is good if you're a company, bad if you're the consumer or worker. Why a regular person might care: Your water quality, air quality, and food quality will probably drop in the next few years. It will take longer to regulate new technology or medicines. This is what I've got. Someone else can correct me if I'm wrong.

@brentkuehne435

Ай бұрын

Basically, it puts big checks and balances on both congress and the administrative agencies. No more ambiguous laws! And no more ambiguous interpretations, or your going to end up in court.

@brentkuehne435

Ай бұрын

Congress works on average two and a half days per week. Only 20 percent of administrative agencies are working in office. Its time to get to work!

This is a good ruling. The first step should be questioning if the agency even has the authority to enforce the law.

@DarkMatterX1

Ай бұрын

Or if that agency should even exist. Looking at you BATFE, DEA, FCC.

@mikefowler301

Ай бұрын

@@DarkMatterX1 THAT! is what i was thinking as well!!! 👍🤟😃

@DarkMatterX1

Ай бұрын

@@mikefowler301 You know what I find amazingly disheartening? Just how much modern Americans are in love with government control of other people's lives. Irrespective of which "side" they claim to be on.

@cdbb6157

Ай бұрын

Congress created the agencies....

@adamthomas7250

Ай бұрын

They obviously have the right to enforce as they are part of the Executive branch that is responsible for enforcing laws. The good news is now they cannot create their own legislation turning law abiding citizens into felons overnight for purely politically motivated reasons.

In a democratic republic any ambiguity should side with the people not the executive branch. Freedom over tyranny

@freqmgr

Ай бұрын

True but everyone needs to remember that this administration has not felt the need to follow SCOTUS's decisions.

@PyroEnderSlayer

Ай бұрын

The constitution is filled with ambiguity 😂 if it wasn’t we wouldn’t need constitutional scholars and Judges to interpret it

@mikefowler301

Ай бұрын

@@PyroEnderSlayer Wrong it's cut and dry, Only tyrants and (sleasy lawyers) try to interpret it to there way of thinking, Kinda like a "militia being the national guard" is one example.

@behindthacrookedcross

Ай бұрын

⁠@@PyroEnderSlayerPlus it wad written 237 years ago 😅

@mnguardianfan7128

Ай бұрын

But the executive branch can freely do bribery though, thanks to SCOTUS

Thanos snap the taxes. Thanos snap the ATF.

Very Good Decision by the Supreme Court!!

Tyrants mad

Oh yeah everyone told me a supreme court pick was not a valid reason to vote Trump.

@neilwatson9709

Ай бұрын

He's putting two younger ones in next year..

@OmarDuval

Ай бұрын

@@neilwatson9709 From jail you mean….

@neilwatson9709

Ай бұрын

@@OmarDuval Over an accounting error. Dream on commie, ever heard of an appeals process?

@benfaunce7496

Ай бұрын

​@@OmarDuval nah, from the white house.

@Martha-jl6eu

Ай бұрын

I have been voting for the potential supreme court justices as well as federal judges my entire life. It is not a bad way to vote.

I'm sure Justice Gorsuch's mom is/would be extremely disappointed in her son's vote. The American people got the short end of the stick ..... Again.

@aaronjohnston1584

Ай бұрын

@lindabingham6403 You either don't understand it, or you're one of them

@lindabingham6403

Ай бұрын

@@aaronjohnston1584 I understand that the courts are taking away the decision making from the people qualified to make the decisions. One of THEM???

Finally. The Congress has to do its job and stop telling beaucracies about how to run the country.

@mikefowler301

Ай бұрын

AMEN to that!

@ThatOpalGuy

Ай бұрын

like maga is capable of that. they cant even decide which speaker to support.

@burntorangehorn

Ай бұрын

Err...this decision says the literal opposite of that. It says that Congress is responsible for telling bureaucracies how to run the country, and in cases where they do not, judges who usually don't understand the subject matter are the ones who will interpret law into implementable policy.

@jackkelly9022

Ай бұрын

Anti American commie criminal, CONGRESS, NOT bureaucracy should make rules and interpret.

@rpscorp9457

Ай бұрын

@@burntorangehorn Putting laws on the books is the literal reason the Congress exists. No laws to interpret, no Supreme Court involvement. The SC cant rule on a law that doesnt exist. This will force congress to become involved again.

I can feel the deep state crying and i love it.

@Malus1531

Ай бұрын

And what/who is this so called “deep state”?

SCOTUS win for We The People again! Love the SCOTUS!!!

@Bidimus1

Ай бұрын

6/3rd of it ACB seems to want the E-branch to not even have to present a case.

@trumphater1789

Ай бұрын

You don't even know what this is ..DO you know who protects the food and water and keeps corporations from giving you poison water and food ...FDA..this ruling effects corporations and guarantees you drink dirty water and poison food ..but go ahead and clap keep clapping while your kids choke ..lol

@a.jdeets5527

Ай бұрын

Tell me how this benefits the people? All it does is give lobbyists even more power over the laws that are passed. We need regulations to stop corporate greed.

@UniqueBreakfastTaco

Ай бұрын

​@@a.jdeets5527regulations don't stop corporate greed. Look what pharma did with the help of the FDA...

@interstellarsurfer

Ай бұрын

​@@a.jdeets5527It helps prevent lobbyists from bypassing Congress and bribing the Executive directly -- which is exactly what happened in the original Chevron case. Chevron had bribed the EPA boss to bend the rules to their liking.

Good! Return the responsibility to congress. Thats the duty and responsibilities of congress.

@freqmgr

Ай бұрын

But, but, then we have to decide what the law says and people may not like that and we may not be reelected!

@ThatOpalGuy

Ай бұрын

of which, one side is completely unable to do its job.

@a.jdeets5527

Ай бұрын

So our lawmakers can get bought out by corporations and lobbyists to make regulations impossible?

@combatepistemologist8382

Ай бұрын

Sure. Who needs experts when congress is chock full of chemists, biologists, physicians who understand all about microbiology and pharmacology, for example?

@sues3218

Ай бұрын

They don't want to work, they are too busy fund raising all the time to fatten their selfish pockets.

Can you imagine anyone from the public being upset and siding with the agencies on this ? The fact Sotomayor was so upset about it tells you where her allegiance is. This is HUGE !! A win for the people for once !

Don’t “micro-legislate” -just get rid of the rules.

Good. This means that the government can't go to court on some weak case. The administrative state has been too strong for a long time

@TeeJayDeluxe

Ай бұрын

It’s paving the way for a right wing fascist take over and if anyone thinks that better, they really need to educate themselves

Because Chevron has been overturned shouldn't the corporate veil be removed as well?

Applaud 👏 the decision! ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

@AlexM-ht9ff

Ай бұрын

You're evil

Give free rein to corporations to dump their garbage into our environment. Say hello to more PFAS in your drinking water, more pollutants in our lakes, and more toxic particulates in your air.

@dafeekielelliott2442

Ай бұрын

Dang, if only there was a solution to this like passing clear laws that arent vague.

@Spartan1312

Ай бұрын

@@dafeekielelliott2442 ikr lol

@tristenatorplaysgames6833

Ай бұрын

@@dafeekielelliott2442congress won’t

@brentkuehne435

Ай бұрын

FOOLISHNESS! It just means congress will actually have to start doing their job! Maybe no more two and a half day work weeks 🤔

@TrueMohax

Ай бұрын

@@tristenatorplaysgames6833 States can

have to use the Constitution like it's written

@benreiter7218

Ай бұрын

Prioritize large corporations’ business interests. Not sure that was in the constitution, but here we are.

@dafeekielelliott2442

Ай бұрын

@@benreiter7218 I would much prefer vague laws being better for businesses over it allowing non elected government organizations to make up new rules.

@coolbugfacts1234

Ай бұрын

please tell me in the constitution where it says I cannot cause large scale brain damage of children by using leaded gasoline.

@dafeekielelliott2442

Ай бұрын

@@coolbugfacts1234 Nowhere of course, that comes down to laws on the state and/or federal level.

@coolbugfacts1234

Ай бұрын

@@dafeekielelliott2442 So you think when a corporation invents a new type of brain eating microplastic that is killing children, instead of the EPA banning it, we should wait 2-3 years for Congress to pass a law. I think you may be suffering from lead poisoning yourself! 🤡🤡🤡

Now the Presidency needs a Duty Statement so that it can be determined what actions are protected "official business" and which are not. Criminal actions cannot be considered immune "official business." All claims of immunity for questionable and criminal actions will have to be resolved in court, with the courts determining if the President's actions were "official business" or not. The SCOTUS decision is not a free pass for all Presidential actions. And now, the DOJ will have to charge a sitting President for criminal actions so that the courts can respond. Waiting for the end of a term can no longer be tolerated.

Congress should manage regulations. Own it.

@sirconrad8328

Ай бұрын

@@gregorypowell9132 congress can’t manage a Taco Bell drive through, what makes you think they can successfully take care of micro managing a country?

@gregorypowell9132

Ай бұрын

@sirconrad8328 well... I guess " that" will show pretty fast. It's why we have two year terms. Isn't it?

@benfaunce7496

Ай бұрын

​​@@sirconrad8328they shouldn't. No one should in the Federal government.

We are being set free from the administrative departments that have ruled us despite it being unconstitutional.

@Maelstromme

Ай бұрын

More like being set free from clean drinking water.

@brentkuehne435

Ай бұрын

​@@Maelstromme foolishness!

Excellent! Congress will have to take responsibility for the laws they pass instead of passing the buck to the bureaucracy. They've been purposefully passing ambiguous laws and letting the bureaucrats run the country.

@brentkuehne435

Ай бұрын

EXACTLY !

@angelalewis3645

Ай бұрын

Hooray!

State agencies are given their power by these federal agencies and should be shut down as well. ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW!! END ADMINISTRATIVE LAW!!

The Surpreme COURT is kicking Azz🤣😂🤣

@nsf_oreo7685

Ай бұрын

Yeah, the peoples azz 😂

@KiloMintoni-kg4kn

Ай бұрын

I think you mean sucking..

@RejectOneWorldGov

Ай бұрын

By people you mean PEOPLE that work for the Government. You dont mean people as in civilians.

@Jon_EL

Ай бұрын

Why is this a good thing it just sounds like they have to check with congress more you know the people bought and paid for by corporations. Hey Jim Jordan can I dump toxic waste into this small towns water supply? Sure thing Bud! Hey Nancy Pelosi is this gun illegal? Why of course it is. Like why is that better. These people are elected in hyper gerrymandered districts so its not like you can even vote them out, just gotta wait till they die

@sirconrad8328

Ай бұрын

@@RejectOneWorldGovyes actually, they made it so an already slow government is landlocked more with minutiae. We can’t even agree as to what the broad stokes of legislation should be, never mind up and coming advanced tech regulations, environmental regulations, workers protections, anything that government agencies could take into their own hands is now out the window. We are more divided than ever, why tf is it a good thing that congress now needs to argue about things they have no professional knowledge about. Like, thanks Supreme Court for making it that corporations can throw anything they want into rivers because the EPA was just gutted.

This was long overdue. These unelected Czars we have now days have way to much power hopefully this will reel them in abit much more is needed though

FINALLY!

ABOUT TIME!!

So, for one example, agencies like the EPA would no longer be able to set pollution standards for factories? As if we don't already have enough problems with the climate.

@brentkuehne435

Ай бұрын

Maybe they can go to China where they are really needed 🤔

finally, make them do their jobs! if they aren't smart enough on the topic bring in experts to help or better yet reduce the amount of laws it is getting crazy.

@wildmouse5888

Ай бұрын

Yes! Consult the experts BEFORE you write the law instead of letting bureaucrats who may or may NOT be experts interpret it as they wish.

@donrichter3523

Ай бұрын

Yup, now the Dems will have to depend buffoons like AOC to make law.

@a.jdeets5527

Ай бұрын

They have no reason to do that now, they’ll just agree with whatever lobbyist pays them the most money.

@neilreynolds3858

Ай бұрын

The "experts" are a big part of the problem.

This battle between the republicans (not the GOP) and the federalists has been raging since before our country was founded. The size, scope and power of the federal government was hotly debated and is a reason why so much of our governmental form was created and why so much of the constitution is dedicated to defining what powers the federal government has and does NOT have. For so long the federalists have been winning these battles so it’s great to see the tide turning in favor of the republicans.

@angelalewis3645

Ай бұрын

❤

GREAT! Does anyone really trust the agencies in their interpretation of laws? This is a great ruling!

Oh great, incompetence now gets to decide the meaning of the laws ?!?!?! Oh no, we are doomed for sure!!!!!! This supreme court has to be the wirst ever!!!!!!

If the ATF can't violate Americans constitutional rights what will they do

@sues3218

Ай бұрын

They will still try, but now the people have a way to stop them in the courts.

Agencies are supposed to answer to the executive branch any way.

This one is more good than bad. However, it may turn all bad over the long haul, especially if voters are underrepresented vs. businesses (i.e. money). As always, time will tell. The voting track record, being that it is, doesn't bode well for the lot of us.

well of course not! otherwise any dem could make up any kind of stupid and self-serving interpretation. I'm surprised it ever was upheld in 1984.

@odysseus2656

Ай бұрын

The deep state was not so obvious in its actions back then. Watergate was the high water mark of their interference back then.

@blankexpression2u

Ай бұрын

@user-wd4ut2pg9o theyve been doing it with all the restrictions the ATF places on american citizens, we limit them!

@donrichter3523

Ай бұрын

Ummm, yeah! That’s what Dems have been doing all along. Unfortunately, our dumfuq Republican Congress critters have played into democrat hands with their lazy vague laws that clever dems have used to cram regulations down our throats. That buffoon John Cornyn played right into dem hands with that stupid Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. Then Biden, or whoever was running the country, used that to instruct DOJ/ATF to go after the 2A. I hope Texas punishes Cornyn permanently for his stupidity.

@ThatOpalGuy

Ай бұрын

lol. guess we need more laws banning trans people from bathrooms, or mandating teaching mythological texts in public schools?

@benfaunce7496

Ай бұрын

1984 😂 Coincidence?

Wonderful! Now let's get rid of low-flow toilets and shower heads. Also, onerous EPA requirements that force restrictions on major appliances, like air conditioners and water heaters. These things drive up costs for consumers and have a negative impact on standard of living.

Oh no! You mean federal agencies are going to have to pause for a moment and ask themselves if what they're about to do is lawful? Before they do it

“Chevron” was unconstitutional from square one. Just like Roe v Wade was. We have _three_ branches of government, not four. The purview of interpreting the law lies with the judiciary, not the bureaucracy.

It was congress that created these agencies to begin with because they realized the need for experts and how impossible it would be to micro legislate a modern society.

@UniqueBreakfastTaco

Ай бұрын

Wrong on every account.

@burntorangehorn

Ай бұрын

​@UniqueBreakfastTaco How so? How is microlegislation a reasonable system of governance, especially when the current Congress ranks as the least productive in history?

@Grunttamer

Ай бұрын

It violated the separation of powers so too bad

@Grunttamer

Ай бұрын

@@burntorangehorn micro legislation is preferable to giving agencies a blank check

@cdbb6157

Ай бұрын

@@Grunttamer and what powers is it you believe executive agencies should have? The violation here is the power grab by the judiciary

What about the IRS??? FACT: The only liability every placed on anyone for the income tax is the original Tariff act that placed the tax liability is place on the named source AND the government worker tax collector.

Agencies would probably submit bills and guidelines to Congressional committees

@mark_morse

Ай бұрын

Some process to that affect is the point of the decision. In other words, voters can remove the elected officials who passed the egregious law and elect instead officials who will get the policy right.

@Spartan1312

Ай бұрын

THAT is what they desperately wanted to avoid. Do you know how many politicians used the agencies to pass rules they themselves would never sign off on because of the backlash from voters?

What a great day for Americans!

Now maybe we can get 'right to repair' our own vehicles and everything else that can't be repaired instead of buying new crap constantly

@Maelstromme

Ай бұрын

Uh, that’s now how that works. Corporations don’t allow you to repair, not the agencies.

@Yor_gamma_ix_bae

Ай бұрын

Hahaha are you stupid? This will allow the companies total authority thru their control of legislators.

@Yor_gamma_ix_bae

Ай бұрын

You think unelected officials are bought, imagine the guys who companies pay good money so they get elected! Use your small brain. Who do you think is going to be writing the rules for Congress? It’s going to be APPLE in the room when repair rights are decided by a select committee. Not your ass. This will be a rewriting of all the rules , to favor the people who put Congress in power.

This all started because geriatric Joe had to have his inspectors on the fishing boats charging them $800 a day if they made any money or not

Suoreme Court forwarding progress on Project 2025.

So average Americans are going to be at the mercy of the wealthy, whether it’s Saudi, Chinese or Brazilian wealth. Really great if you’re a corrupt developer I suppose.

@donrichter3523

Ай бұрын

WTF are you talking about? It does mean Democrats will be more hamstrung and can’t write vague laws and use the faceless unelected bureaucrats to do their evil attempts to control our lives.

@mikefowler301

Ай бұрын

wtf? where did you get that? No it just limits bureaucrats from dreaming up new laws, And by the way only congress can do that. EPA terrorized regular families or did you even care? and the atf was doing the same thing turning millions of people into criminals overnight, So where the hell did you get that crap?

@SlyFan-mp8dc

Ай бұрын

You seem to think that that wasn’t the case before this ruling.

@UniqueBreakfastTaco

Ай бұрын

We're you under the impression that wasn't already true?

@mike74h

Ай бұрын

Brazilians??? You afraid every restaurant will be a churrascaria?

Agencies imposing fines on people or companies need to be curtailed to reasonable levels. Dig a hole on your property and the next thing you know you violated some obscure policy and you are being fined $50,000 dollars a day for being out of compliance. Excessive fines or penalties are a problem being imposed by Agencies and the Courts. The real punishment is the process. Having to get a lawyer, and going to Court numerous times.

@rma6070

Ай бұрын

Does everything like enforcing environmental laws but you don't care about them! In about 20 years your property will be worthless anyway because it'll be too damn hot to be there!

@Likeaworm

Ай бұрын

Yup, they weaponized the legal process itself by draining resources and time.

@sues3218

Ай бұрын

Did you know that Congress gave away the power of the purse on fines, fees, and aquisitions. That means those agencies don't have to give any account on the money they took in, or how it was spent. That needs to be challenged and repealed.

@angelalewis3645

Ай бұрын

Yes!

Winning!

What kind of laws are those in this country that you need to interpret them? The law should be exact in words to execute. What is it? A Bible?

Wow! Glad the media is reporting on this. It's one of the lesser known cases among the public but an extremely important one. I remember learning about this case in law school and for the bar and proceeding for years using the rule that "federal agencies are allowed to interpret their own unclear rules" (my hyper-simplified understanding of the case from what I remember). No more.

@mikefowler301

Ай бұрын

I was twenty three when that was ruled on, Didn't like it then (neither did anyone else I knew) don't like it now. Jeebus I am thrilled to death over this decision.

ATF, CDC, EPA, DHS, FBI, and so on and so forth are all unhappy now Good

@cdbb6157

Ай бұрын

Enjoy your increasingly unsafe food, water, and polluted air.

@UniqueBreakfastTaco

Ай бұрын

​@@cdbb6157look around...all those thing you're fearmongering about happened under your beloved bureaucracy. They literally torched a train with methyl chloride.

@vincentgiasullo

Ай бұрын

@@cdbb6157is it any better now?

@sues3218

Ай бұрын

Pleeeeeaaassseeee, I think the Covid debacle showed us how useless those agencies have been.

@Spartan1312

Ай бұрын

@@cdbb6157 You do know we can get those same rules pass if they are popular right. That is the entire point in congress but they wanted to avoid having to vote on laws that might be "unpopular"

Yes! Our food, water, air, soil can be contaminated even more! Woohoo. Big win for the rich and the corporations

Question: Does this have anything to do with permitting offices for building on our own lands?????

Yesssss! Chevron overturned! 🎉❤ 🥳 Let’s go! One step closer to taking back our country!

@billyrigby4839

Ай бұрын

Taking it back? Where did it go? 🤔 😅

@donrichter3523

Ай бұрын

@billyrigby4839, ok democrat

@mikefowler301

Ай бұрын

@@billyrigby4839 rule by bureaucrats who thought they could make law, NO they can't only CONGRESS can do that and that's there job by the way.😃

@jasonwiedeman4825

Ай бұрын

You like your rivers on fire? Or just dead from pollution? Do you defer to a doctor for medical advice? Or do you know more?

@esquiredan2702

Ай бұрын

@@jasonwiedeman4825Republicans can make more money by selling bottled water than by making sure the masses have healthy tap water. Their voters will eat it up as “good business”

Excellent! The government needs to be reigned in. Too much left to interpretation and now much less so.

@cdbb6157

Ай бұрын

"the government" no concern about totally unchecked judicial power and associated evidence of corruption?

@sues3218

Ай бұрын

@@cdbb6157 The corruption is in the three letter agencies (unelected officials) overstepping their boundaries. Congress is the maker of laws not them, with all states elected representatives voting on it. If we don't like how they vote on any issue, we can vote them out. If they vote in something unconstitutional, we can take it to the Supreme Court and have it repealed, like with Cheveron Deference. Welcome to our seperation of powers in a Constitutional Republic. Unelected beurocrats should not be making laws, period. If you don't like our Republic, then move to another nation.

@Insight5504

Ай бұрын

@@cdbb6157 no longer can unelected bureaucrats interprete law how they see fit. I rather have a judge determine what can and cannot go forward before rather than defer and blindly allow something and then have to rule after. Either way it ends up before a judge. But I view it as prevention being worth a pound of cure and an extra check and balance put into place.

@jenmoriarty9461

Ай бұрын

@@Insight5504Why do people act like these bureaucracies are not filled with civil servants who spend decades of their lives in fields dedicated to the sort of stuff Congress doesn’t have time for. Ambiguity in the law exists for the possibility of differing interpretations to ensure the best application. Fed agencies are better suited to interpret those ambiguities and this is an incredibly stupid decision that will place a greater onus on a dysfunctional Congress to do things they already show very clearly they cannot do.

@leolor9328

Ай бұрын

You’re so right, instead of the government, we’ll start letting large corporations gain even more power to screw all the small folks!!