Special thanks to Ridge Wallet for jumping in to sponsor today's video. Gotta say, at first I didn't know what to expect but I was sold with just how compact the wallet is. if your in the market, they are best at what they do - get the titanium one cause its just so cool. ridge.com/FNE

@dillongamer1131

2 жыл бұрын

First reply :D

@LOSTTEMPLAR

2 жыл бұрын

Making any video about Forward Sept wings?

@rubenbezares2592

2 жыл бұрын

This is fake there is only 1 working model, the other crashed when being delivered. As I now there is no worries

@rubenbezares2592

2 жыл бұрын

There is only 1 working right now, the second crashed when the attempted to deliver it.

@edwardfletcher7790

2 жыл бұрын

Dude, please learn to pronounce Sukhoi correctly....FFS Also your "unguided rockets" are flares. lol

The animation is reaching Mustard levels of quality

@nebunezz_r

2 жыл бұрын

Mustard but upload frequently

@hchand02

2 жыл бұрын

I am really curious to know which software its used to create such delicious models , do u by chance know which platform mustard uses ???

@thesupreme8062

2 жыл бұрын

@@nebunezz_r not as high quality

@fridaycaliforniaa236

2 жыл бұрын

@@hchand02 I thinks it's Blender. He told about it once =)

@hchand02

2 жыл бұрын

@@fridaycaliforniaa236 thanks 🙏😊

It's made for export. The official trailer for it has pilots from all major non-Western markets being called to witness it.

@algirdas6012

2 жыл бұрын

Its not made, not yet. This is just a sales pitch.

@strikeeagle3159

2 жыл бұрын

India is not buying ngl

@danielvandermerwe7921

2 жыл бұрын

It’s going to be trash. I mean fine for selling around the world but won’t beat F35 or older F22 raptor. Or f16 or f15 for that matter.

@strikeeagle3159

2 жыл бұрын

@@danielvandermerwe7921 agree russsia dosent have enough cpiital to devlop

@-VinhKhang_yearsago

2 жыл бұрын

@@danielvandermerwe7921 insane agenda 🤣 overrated us

The SU-75 is a ghost of a fighter, literally! Nobody’s ever seen it for real!

@ttkh68thomas43

5 ай бұрын

propagranda, talk only no real fact

@dudeski6548

5 ай бұрын

@@ttkh68thomas43 Fun fact 75 in Su-75 is the amount of years it will take to make one

@user-zl8hp2xe7m

5 ай бұрын

Я вам больше скажу все знают о су 57 но мало кто знает про як 132 самый засекречиный самолёт РФ

@driveramd12

5 ай бұрын

because is a ghost, and Ghost don't exist. Try to fly one, see what happens.

@Church449

5 ай бұрын

The United States cannot take down a squadron of the Checkmate or the Felon, because neither have the numbers for a squadron.

One important thing to consider is by the time the SU-75 is ready for full production, the NGAD 6th gen will be as well. Personally, I do not see that as a "Checkmate".

@stickiedmin6508

Ай бұрын

That's assuming that the Su-75 ever even makes it out of the design stage, let alone prototyping / testing. The NATO reporting name for this thing should be the Su-75 Fantasy, or Su-75 Fictional.

Russia (as well as other vast countries) uses twin-engine fighter jets, as they have to cover long distances and -in case of emergency- the nearest airfield could be far away. Most other countries, though, prefer single-engine jet fighter, so the russians create a single-engine version of their own jets. It's an export-oriented plane, not a backbone of russian forces or something.

@shimadwan8251

2 жыл бұрын

Pakistan

@creator7583

2 жыл бұрын

They have not dominated for only one century , whenever / wherever , in the long run/historically dominant ,as one civilization disappeared they rise with a new stronger , hence supremacy.

@lackofgravitation6458

2 жыл бұрын

ur absoletely wright

@constantinemalkovich9089

2 жыл бұрын

Всё проще мой друг, дело в том что тяговооружённость у совковых двигателей низкая, по этому используют спаренные двигатели.😘 Два двигателя это не плюс, а всегда минус.

@vladimirnikolskiy

2 жыл бұрын

@@constantinemalkovich9089 Откуда ты такой не совковый взялся? Два двигателя Су-57 могут выдавать максимальную тягу на форсаже 38 тонн в секунду, тогда как у F-22 только около 32 тонн в секунду.

The extraordinary claims regarding price, range, combat capabilities, delivery targets, etc.: I'll believe it when I see it

@RubenStim

2 жыл бұрын

If only the US followed that advice when they funded the F-35

@namyx_71

2 жыл бұрын

@@Shrew_King It's just an onboard Alexa lol.

@ronidude

2 жыл бұрын

it all depends on sales so tbh i believe russian can do it

@michalpavlat3943

2 жыл бұрын

@@Shrew_King They mention many buzzwords. ;o)

@MiserableJosephson

2 жыл бұрын

Not necessarily a dig at Russia, I'd be sceptical of anyone making such extraordinary claims

It's so stealthy that not even the Russian test pilots have ever seen it fly. It perfectly compliments the new Ilyushin super sonic cargo plane that can carry four tanks, and the clear plastic drones that were purpose built to hunt F-35s.

@randyeduo

Жыл бұрын

typical Americans who can't see their opponents do well, whats up with the lousy defense systems of America that can not compare with that of the Russians

@JULIAN11.

Жыл бұрын

It is the Russian approach to stealth The Su-57 also has the same approach, but because it is less stealthy it can be seen flying (very rare but sometimes happens)

@silver_css3734

Жыл бұрын

calling the Su-57 even some what stealth is a reach, with no RAM (Radar Absorbant Material) and exposed bolts on the wing pannels. Yeah it's an approach but even their stealth fighter can't be made in quantity or even with good quality. let alone the fact that it's radar cross section would be embarrassing to miss.

@JULIAN11.

Жыл бұрын

​@@silver_css3734 It has the RCS of a clean F/A-18 Super Hornet; so about ~1m² At best, is a low observable 4.5 generation fighter, or a very bad 5th generation fighter The thing doesn't even have functional missile bays... functional for a (theatrically) 5th generation fighter (It is basically the same as a WW2 bomber, not pressurized), so asking it to be as stealthy as any other modern aircraft is kind of asking for too much

@hanumharkit1485

11 ай бұрын

Sarsasm...😂

this plane is so stealthy no one has ever seen it and no one ever will

@VivaVenezuelaa

Жыл бұрын

funniest american

@verdorrenstudios

Жыл бұрын

My guy the plane is sill in the testing face the first prototype will be made in 2024 to 2025.

@IrishCaesar

Жыл бұрын

@@verdorrenstudios no it won't hahahahhahaha not with all these sanctions. Russia can't make its own complex electronics and absolutely cannot match the west in precision and electronics. Have you seen the Su-57? Unshielded compressor blades, fucking exposed screws and indents on the wings. No shot is that a stealth fighter

@hospital3568

Жыл бұрын

why yall taking this man so seriously

@verdorrenstudios

Жыл бұрын

@@hospital3568 Cause there saying that not even a model of the plane would even be made.

I just get the feeling that this is a modern, single seat, single engine multi role fighter bomber intended to be sold to Russia's Allies and Countries that operate Russian aircraft to replace old end of life Mig-21's, Mig-23's, mig-27's, and Su-22's.

@S1lverarrow

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, only UAE ins't known as Russian ally and operator of Migs and Su

@gordonlawrence1448

2 жыл бұрын

The MIg-21 will never be end of life!

@nemanjic2864

2 жыл бұрын

Srbijaaaaa👋

@shashwatmukherjee6301

2 жыл бұрын

Good option for India to buy these planes in future to replace Old depleting Fighter jets like Mig 21 n Jaguars. 😎👍👏👏👌

@arianmokhtariha4664

2 жыл бұрын

you mean iran exactly

"Can be flown by A.I." Alright, someone get the ace combat protagonists, we gonna need them

@gabrielepierige8151

2 жыл бұрын

nice

@philippey4918

2 жыл бұрын

i remember that there is a film where a new prototype of plane that was controled by an AI(american) was added to a squad and started to fly by himself

@LuixWalkingDead21

2 жыл бұрын

@@philippey4918 It was called Stealth, its kinda meh, but it did have some nice cgi dogfight scenes for the time

@ulrichkristensen4087

Жыл бұрын

Russia cant even get spare part to their computers

@Eluderatnight

Жыл бұрын

@@ulrichkristensen4087 ROFL neither can anyone else. VID 0ne nein really messed thing up globally. Supplies are kinda meh even in the US.

All very impressive, but the SA-32 Thunderbolt Starfury is capable of reaching orbit and operating as a space superiority fighter, as well as being armed with four advanced plasma pulse cannons and has hardpoints for up to ten additional weapons. It's also every bit as real as the SU-75.

@mandoreforger6999

11 ай бұрын

It will also fire the “SuperZircon” missile, which flies at roughly light speed and has a KyberCrystal warhead, which can destroy a whole planet. Ask the citizens of Alderaan how real this weapon is…

@zerosteel0123

10 ай бұрын

​@@mandoreforger6999😂😂😂

@stephenkolostyak4087

9 ай бұрын

Strictly speaking the SA-32 "Thunderbolt" is a transatmospheric air and space superiority fighter capable of force projection as far as jump gates are available due to its only limitation being a lack of jumpdrive.

@zerosteel0123

9 ай бұрын

@@stephenkolostyak4087 haven't heard of the MiG 41 yet, eh?

@russellk.bonney8534

9 ай бұрын

Which sci fi movie was that in?

Looks suspiciously similar to the X-32 Ugly Duckling.

I think Russian jets look cooler, because of colour choice

@TheRibbonRed

2 жыл бұрын

Russian jet colors are mostly localized, though they've been trying a similar simple two-tone color on some of their 35 (both Flanker & Fulcrum). America has a lot of customers on all hemispheres, so they opt to have the simple grey paint that should blend in most skies.

@progressivelibertarianview8832

2 жыл бұрын

The black bird looks the best

@dylanwhite3383

2 жыл бұрын

Same

@Invalidar

2 жыл бұрын

I also love how they blend curves into angles.

@ankurhaldar8836

2 жыл бұрын

But SU75 looks shit,I like SU57 more

I seem to recall a certain saying- ‘believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see’ It’s not like they’d admit to being behind.

@SmotritelMayaka29

2 жыл бұрын

This is what was said in 2015 when Putin spoke about the Poseidon nuclear torpedo. Now the former skeptics are looking at the working torpedo in horror.

@IAmTheAce5

2 жыл бұрын

@@SmotritelMayaka29 I wonder if the horror is more to the point than the actual functionality, though

@ThePowerLover

2 жыл бұрын

@@SmotritelMayaka29 A nuclear torpedo is not big deal to develop, a fifth gen fighter in the other hand...

@Gunni1972

2 жыл бұрын

IF IT FLIES within 5 years, they are ahead of the F-35. At least from a technological perspective, as they use tech of today, not from 20 years ago. Again: IF IT FLIES.

@ThePowerLover

2 жыл бұрын

@@Gunni1972 But Russian tech is like 15-20 years behind!

Ironically, It will be checkmated by other aircrafts very easily

@user-gz2pv2jn6o

2 ай бұрын

Give me proof mr.bias

What I seem to notice about the eastern block is that the Soviet Union and Russian Federation has really good designs and concepts for military equipment, but lack funding and proper engineering know-how to successfully make them function as they were internet

@hehe-jg8zz

Жыл бұрын

Lack of funding? More like politicians went stealing spree

@abeliniguez9705

Жыл бұрын

@@hehe-jg8zz and that is definitely true, but at the end of it they would lack the funds

@jeremyr7147

Жыл бұрын

Soviet union doesn't exist, but the russian spirit is great. Theyre starting to build their funding back up after the past destruction of the country.

@abeliniguez9705

Жыл бұрын

@@jeremyr7147 hopefully they can pick themselves back up after this, it’d be interesting to see what comes up from the most resilient people on earth

@MrM0nKey79

Жыл бұрын

Yup, the best plane in the world means nothing if you can't afford to build and maintain it.

The comment section of this video will be...interesting. *Throws popcorn in the microwave*

@thedamnedatheist

2 жыл бұрын

The entire section is going to be "'Murica YeeHaw!!".

@shaider1982

2 жыл бұрын

This is where the fun begins🤣✌

@letmechangemyusername

2 жыл бұрын

Take a look at the America and Russia fanboys arguing.

@Gunni1972

2 жыл бұрын

Throws a ridge wallet to the popcorn. "Not on my watch, comrade". LOL

@kevineldracher9422

2 жыл бұрын

FACT

Su-75 is an aircraft that surpasses other current 5th gen stealth category fighters by a wide margin: not only its stealth, it even does not exist!!;)

@NotLRK

2 жыл бұрын

It does exist but its still in prototype up for display it wont be released until 2023

@letecmig

2 жыл бұрын

@@NotLRK its not a prototype. Its cardboard mockup

@rick7424

2 жыл бұрын

@@NotLRK Sure buddy. The onboard computer will probably run on Windows Vista.

@kousand9917

Жыл бұрын

I just made a aircraft to surpass it. It's called the Gfjsye-2548362819643 but no one can see it, top secret

@jhonedoe3734

Жыл бұрын

why do americans hate russia so much..? I dont care who is better, this plane is beautiful and I think it will eventually make it to the skies. instead of hating let's try to compete and make better machines, if history thought us something, the most powerful nations always fall while in denial of not being the best anymore.

Given current events I'd be shocked if this jet ever flies

@user-zl8hp2xe7m

5 ай бұрын

Про Авангард Пересвет насколько я помню говорили мультики Путина сейчас не смешно

@ojjoooooo

4 ай бұрын

WhAT events?

as the missle said, the 75 in the su-75 is the amount of years it will take for Sukhoi to make a proper stealth fighter.

@badi95toinfinity

8 ай бұрын

Hollywood is taking its toll on you my friend

@vitsobotka6268

8 ай бұрын

and even tho the 75 is suppossed to be stealth it still uses the IRS dome... which is literally a fucking lighthouse on a radar... meaning its stealth capability is shit... and it doesnt even exist...

@ricefarmer_1152

8 ай бұрын

@@badi95toinfinity wow wow look whos talking, filled with russian propagannda. Here's a fact, Russia's military is in such a bad state that even though its the second strongest army it cant even defeat ukraine

@ricefarmer_1152

8 ай бұрын

@@badi95toinfinity also your ass fails to realize that su 57, the apparent russian 5th gen aircraft only has 21 aircraft, and only 11 of those are in service and it took over 40 years for it to enter service, developed 1975, in service 2020 . Whilst the f-35 started development in 1995 and first entered service in 2015, thats 25 full years faster than the su 57 annd it already has over 1000 aircraft in service. So your dumbass needs to wake up and understand that without other buyers russia does not have the capabilities or the requried technology that can rival the US's

@buggyman286

8 ай бұрын

India backed out of a potential deal with the SU57, due to technical failures and engine malfunctions. Not what was promised to them.. since no one is lining up to purchase the 57 its program is a failure.. checkmate my a** 😂

The F35 isn't a superiority fight, but a multirole fight.

@jamesmaddison4546

Жыл бұрын

it shows how shitty your aircraft is when you have to compare a superiority fighter to a strike aircraft 😂

@zerosteel0123

10 ай бұрын

Also a good submarine

@KD-wl3fk

10 ай бұрын

@@zerosteel0123A submarine that can fly, is being sold globally, and isn’t a riveted together wooden mockup piece of shit like the last two Russian aircraft.

@zerosteel0123

10 ай бұрын

@@KD-wl3fk 😂😂😂 you guys are funny. Interesting seeing western equipment getting shredded and blown to bits right now. I guess you guys aren't so tough after all.

@KD-wl3fk

10 ай бұрын

@@zerosteel0123 Wow, 2 leopards and a couple of M-2’s get destroyed and you guys are shocked? Its war dumbass, stuff will get destroyed. Whats about the mountains and mountains of T-72’s, T-80’s, BMP-1/2’s, and other Russian equipment that has been shredded by basic Javelins and TOW missiles? Does that mean the Russian Army is completely useless? Wait till NATO actually shows up, because you guys will be on your knees begging for forgiveness when your entire air-force is grounded and we are on the doorstep of Saint Petersburg within 48 hours.

In Russia you don’t play chess with chess pieces *You play with fighter jets*

@tombrunila2695

2 жыл бұрын

With fighter jets that exist only as anímations!

@letmechangemyusername

2 жыл бұрын

@@tombrunila2695 And, this video is ruined.

@richardsears4665

2 жыл бұрын

@@tombrunila2695 the truth

@user-xj9lp3fs7m

2 жыл бұрын

@@tombrunila2695 damn people really hate russian developments, yet they hype the american FA-XX so much (which even the animation itself doesnt exist yet) lmao. cant you just take the joke without having to despise russia?

@tombrunila2695

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-xj9lp3fs7m, the only stuff that is being hyped is Soviet/Russia weapons! They are all supposed to be vastly superior, but when the shooting starts they prove to have been expensive targets! And then comes the claim that the Soviet Union or Russia had delivered substandard "export" versions of the weapons to their most important clients! NEVER is there even a hint of that before the shooting starts. Before the claim is that these super weapons will make mince meat out of Western weapons! And this "new" Russian fighter is a copy of what Northrop had developed nearly 30th years ago!

It's August 2023 now. But still no records of a Test Flight for the Su-75 Checkmate...

@murkywateradminssions5219

3 ай бұрын

February 2024 (or January 31st for some people) Where checkmate test flight?

@ninjacat5135

Ай бұрын

the worst thing is that im not even surprised, i quickly realized why people call the su75 fe_boy

Give me a break, the felon is held together by deck screws and caulking

It's pretty similar to the Boeing X-32B, just less stealthy and I remember when Russia said that the TU-144 was better than the Concorde

@eliasziad7864

2 жыл бұрын

It is

@Jusuff

2 жыл бұрын

@@eliasziad7864 except the Concorde was much more reliable than the TU-144, the Concorde could supercruise at Mach 2 while the Tupolev couldn't, the passenger cabin in the Concorde was as quiet as a normal airliner while the TU-144's was so noisy that passengers had to pass notes to each other, The Concorde had a brilliant safety record apart from a crash that was caused by tire debris from another aircraft while the TU-144 had 226 failures during 102 flights. The only thing the Tupolev beat the Concorde at was speed

@josephmana8972

Жыл бұрын

Fake Russia military is outdated and old

@eliasziad7864

Жыл бұрын

@@josephmana8972 Same for US army...

@josephmana8972

Жыл бұрын

@@eliasziad7864your third world country can't even compete against us y'all weak and poor and outdated

I'm sure this thing will be as highly successful as the T-14 Armata main battle tank...

@Darkpara1

Жыл бұрын

They've produced like 10 of them in 10 years.

@rvsonthelevel8746

Жыл бұрын

lol I have a feeling you are correct.

@floppi7098

11 ай бұрын

Wow funny come up with something new kid.

@matitjamatheson4395

11 ай бұрын

​@@Darkpara1source? It's top secret info for the Russian defence circles so you as an arrogant teen have no hope of knowing them yet

@zerosteel0123

10 ай бұрын

This comment didn't age well. How are those leopard tanks and Bradley's doing now? 😂😂😂

“Go 2 times the speed of light…” yeah sure

USA should be really afraid of those who made this high quality CGI animation

If Russia is selling this plane to it's trading partners, it's not that much of a threat to the US.

@polygamous1

2 жыл бұрын

You can say this for the F35 too, But the export models of weapons are always second best, no one sells their best everyone expects this, but whatever we only know what They want us to know more likely what their adversary knows n zero more

@alwayscensored6871

2 жыл бұрын

Just a way to make money, not a threat.

@rickrudd

2 жыл бұрын

We should have sold the USSR millions of first generation Ford Pintos. The Cold War could've ended 15 years earlier!

@Heat3YT2

2 жыл бұрын

The f35 was made to fill requirements by the us military and serve as an export platform for their allies. As far as I know, the Russian military didn’t ask for this and may not ever buy it. This is made entirely by the company with intention to export. In some regard it is competition as export products but in reality the customers would be different. US and Russia tend to sell to different countries.

@hermannabt8361

2 жыл бұрын

South America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia excluding Japan and maybe South Korea. Sounds like a big enough market.

These kinda videos about Russian air superiority didn't really age well...

@ncc1701218

2 жыл бұрын

How?!

@mikewade777

2 жыл бұрын

@@ncc1701218 because Russia can't achieve it.

@ncc1701218

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikewade777 Do you have Russia today in your country?

@mikewade777

2 жыл бұрын

@@ncc1701218 you should try a channel that isn't bullshitting you.

@clappednbroke

2 жыл бұрын

@@ncc1701218 wow you're only source that russia Inst making a complete ass of itself is its own propaganda channel. And everyone knows that russia can't afford to build these new vehicles to a scale that would be effective. Why do you think we haven't seen the t14 armada in Ukraine?

Let's see if the Sukhoi Su-73 "Checkmate" can counter an AIM-120 AMRAAM, assuming that wooden mock-up ever gets off the ground.

@Lucapanfil

9 ай бұрын

Ur father is prob as stealthy as ur fave jet “F22 raptor”

@enbygaming5996

9 ай бұрын

@@Lucapanfil At least I have one.

@Lucapanfil

9 ай бұрын

@@enbygaming5996 well y do u never see him? Is it his stealth tech

@RogueSkull

2 ай бұрын

​@@Lucapanfilnever see him? Russian bots are funny

@Lucapanfil

2 ай бұрын

@@RogueSkull Shiver me timbers an ai pfp user.

This video is 2 years old and the plane has still never flown.

@SuperGeronimo999

8 күн бұрын

Yeah, meanwhile US has flown 6th gen prototype already... Russia lagging behind as usual.

Finally Sukhoi provided data about how the new Su 75 can easily destroy an F-35... A Tu 95 loaded with all blueprints and promises of this marvellous plane should have to fly above an airport where there is at least an F-35 landed in the middle of the parking range, very visible. Then the Tupolev -95 would make a landing crash on the F-35...

@laynestaley4957

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@aandradejr213

5 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

For the record, that weapons diagram was for the F-18, not the F-16.

The hawker tempest that will come out in 2032 as the new eurofighter looks a lot like the f22 raptor

Su 75 the "stealth fighter" with a double chin

I seriously doubt the US is Afraid of the SU75 sounds like a click bait title to me.

@elpafishing

2 жыл бұрын

Normal when you are KZreadr ...that's paid advert

@DSM85986

2 жыл бұрын

You are free to think whatever your doubt doesn't change anything 😜

@wishfulguy4819

2 жыл бұрын

At USD40 million a piece it just worth it

@Just_A_Random_Desk

2 жыл бұрын

@@DSM85986 we're really not scared of an imaginary jet

@DSM85986

2 жыл бұрын

@@Just_A_Random_Desk to me been on your bed for sure you are not but those who will really face it does your response is equally as of my grandmother

F-35 doesn’t have the highest thrust-to-weight ratio, but its engine sure as hell does. If they can’t beat that, they’ll just have a cool-looking fighter that still needs to hang stores externally.

@valenrn8657

2 жыл бұрын

On empty weight, F-35A Block 3F's T/W ratio is similar to F-16C Block 50/52's. F-35A has an active engine upgrade program.

@graham1996

2 жыл бұрын

The F35 is actually underpowered they have a newer engine in development.

@valenrn8657

2 жыл бұрын

@@graham1996 false, For empty weight, F-35A T/W ratio is similar to F-16C Block 50's. You haven't normalised the range between the two aircraft design.

@valenrn8657

2 жыл бұрын

@@graham1996 The basic wing loading without body and vortex lift. F-35A Empty weight: 29,300 lb Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet. F-16C Block 52 Wing area: 300 ft² Empty weight: 18,900 lb Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. F-35A's empty weight is 1.54X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's wing area is 1.53X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's 43,000 lbf thrust is 1.50X scaled from F-16C's 28,600 lbf. There's a reason for the engine upgrade program. F-35A's 45,000 lbf thrust upgrade road map is 1.57X scaled from F-16C's 28,600 lbf. F-35A needs at least 44,330 lbs thrust to preserve 1.55X scale factor There's a near straight 1.5X scaling between F16C to F-35A on basic wing loading, engine thrust, and empty weight. F-35A's wing area is influenced by weight growth and F-16C's empty weight wing loading target.

@graham1996

2 жыл бұрын

They are working to improve the F135 with 11% more range 10% more thurst and 50% better thermal management. To my knowledge though GE and RR are working on a next gen engine to possibility repower the F35 and 6 gen aircraft.

Yea I have a literal UFO flying saucer fighter that I built in my back yard. It has the ability to shoot down any enemy aircraft or vehicles, day or night, anywhere on Earth, while still taxing out of the hanger!!! It is completely invisible, on radar and optically, and emits no sound or heat whatsoever. It also has a fully functional recreation area for the crew, with everything from a spa to a gym, and a full kitchen with chef if they should feel peckish at any point. There's even ping pong and pool tables if the crew feels like a little competition, since they won't get any from the enemy. Of course it could do everything without the crew on board, but they just love being on board, and once inside, they're basically in the safest place on Earth, even during combat, because of its impenetrable force field. So even if you could see it, there's no type of weapon currently on Earth that could penetrate this force-field, including nuclear weapons. And best of all, it actually exists in exactly the same way this Russian aircraft exists!! So while this Su75 obviously does exist, just like my UFO, it would be like if an ant tried to attack an Abraham's Tank. It would not make much of a dent.

US: F-35 first flight: 2006 F-35s produced: 900 F-22 first flight: 1997 Produced 195 RU: Su-57 first flight: 2010 Su-57 produced: 21 so yeah year after release no signs of the checkmate going anywhere i guess

“AFRAID” is the perfect choice word for clickbait but that’s about it.

@johnathanclayton2887

2 жыл бұрын

From the end of the video, it seemed like he was talking about defense contractors being afraid it would take sales away from the f35, which seems reasonable if it is developed quickly and at near the proposed price.

@alexdias8627

2 жыл бұрын

Scared for a virtual jet....hihihi

@alexdias8627

2 жыл бұрын

Su 57 only 12 units and 2 crash so only 10 now Su 75 ? J 20 has 150 units so far J 31 only 5 units so far F 35 has 500 units worldwide so far ... You decide....kkkk

@alexdias8627

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnathanclayton2887 30 million dollars is impossible for russia becouse its the same price as j 10 from china Su 75 is like 70 million dollars for reality check not a virtual one....

@alexdias8627

2 жыл бұрын

Su 35 is 65 million to 85 million dollars to buy so a new jet is not 30 million dollars its ridiculous....

The U.S has already produced this tech 30 years ago with F22 and F35 and has been operating both while Russia is just getting started. The U.S is already moving on toward Gen 6 fighters.

@McGriddy51095

2 жыл бұрын

I hope our new fighter program produces something dope. I saw the design they unveiled. It looks awesome

@user-xg4dw8wq1p

Жыл бұрын

F-35 неудача сплошная, а насчёт того, кто у кого ещё копирует это надо посмотреть) натырили чертежи в 90х, радуйтесь, что хоть что-то смогли построить, и то не все...

@laynestaley4957

Жыл бұрын

The Check mate looks pretty neat, its just kinda useless considering its first flight is estimated to be in the mid 2020s and the US is trying to press its first 6 Gen fighter into service by the early 2030s...

@pyronuke4768

Жыл бұрын

Technically 40, the F-117 first flew in 1981.

@baronvonlimbourgh1716

Жыл бұрын

It isn't intended for the same market. China will be their main competition.

When they build one prototype, they will move on Su86.

@SuperGeronimo999

8 күн бұрын

Wake me up when it had its first flight...

The United States Air Force is so much further advanced than anything Russia has. One advanced F-16 could take out multiple Russion aircraft and they wouldn't even see it coming.

@Heythere12344

11 ай бұрын

Cap brudda russia fighter jets have always impress everyone especially usa

@younessbenaguida9895

11 ай бұрын

lmao

@magnuskain278

6 ай бұрын

​@@Heythere12344 according to Russia that is

@MT-rg4fn

6 ай бұрын

You gonna get disappointed with F-16 performance in Ukraine

@michaelmichaelagnew8503

5 ай бұрын

@@MT-rg4fn Put our F-16's in there with our pilots and our Air commanders and you will see the F-16 as anything but a disappointment. You will think it is the greatest aircraft ever made. First like we always do we will take out any possible way of yall being able to detect it on radar. But all that will probably start a new war.

It looks like they combined features that the suits and stockholders in the military opted out of (YF-23 and X-32/F-32). Will be interesting to see what it's capable of.

@legofighterjets541

Жыл бұрын

Yes that's what I thought

@HELaughsJRS

Жыл бұрын

russia found another way to copy homework but not be like china

@DiamondSquidy

Жыл бұрын

It’ll be capable of collecting dust seeing as it’s made of wood 💀

@ambassadorofreee3859

10 ай бұрын

@@DiamondSquidy I'm sure it also burns well if they store the wooden mockup indoors

@DiamondSquidy

10 ай бұрын

@@ambassadorofreee3859 yeah the only modern jet that’s a cigaret butt away from being deleted from history 😭

History is replete with high-flown concept planes that under-delivered...or, by the time the kinks in the system were worked out, their "cutting edge" technology was already obsolete. So, I'll worry about the Checkmate when it actually moves beyond 'flying prototype' and into actual production. Until then, it's a paper tiger.

@jonblack3807

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, NATO outmatches Russia and the CSTO in every way.

@chaseprobst7259

10 ай бұрын

Same thing happened with the foxbat, they hyped it up so the USA made f-15 just for the foxbat to be a price of trash

@HasbiJaya-kq9ov

9 ай бұрын

Kita bukti kn mlm ini

@hollowgonzalo4329

7 ай бұрын

@AllTradesGeorge The checkmate isn't exactly "cutting edge" at this point. Not even for Russia. It's more like playing catchup with America, at least insofar as their military purpose aircraft exports are concerned.

@MT-rg4fn

6 ай бұрын

@@jonblack3807 Wishful thinking

Russia: This new plane will change everything. We will dominate the skies. Also Russia: We can only afford to make one… out of wood.

@MrTaramka

5 ай бұрын

The practice of the war in Syria, Georgia and Ukraine has shown that the bastards escape even from wooden Russian planes.

@Retardando

4 ай бұрын

And dry wall screw's :)

@user-gz2pv2jn6o

2 ай бұрын

​@@MrTaramkaya don't forget america lost against fucking farmers in Vietnam and they did not do shit in Korea and they lost in Afghanistan plus ukraine for Russia is going well they are already destroying Abrams and many other nato tanks.

If you think this is impressive, the Roc, the Phoenix and the Thunderbird fly as well as an SU-75 and are just as real.

The Checkmate looks like if you combined the XF-23 and the XF-32

@michalc1018

Жыл бұрын

and look at the cockpit of YF-23 and on the wings of YF-22 and compare this to su-57, its simular right? maybe the only original things of su-57 are engines

@neko1533

Жыл бұрын

@@michalc1018 No! They‘ve stolen the engines from Star Wars or from some other Hollywood shit. I think the Russians have also stolen the english language but they reproduced it to cyrilic, that‘s why we don‘t understand it anymore. However, the first thing they‘ve stolen from the US was the Idea of people having a need to breath to stay alive. (Sarcasm)

@BlackPhantom_II

9 ай бұрын

@@michalc1018 wait what- are you trying to say Su-57 is a copy of...........what the fu- nope not at all doesn't look simular at all

@Gunni1972

6 ай бұрын

@@BlackPhantom_II Even IF, it couldn't be a "copy". More like a Mash-up, and if someone could pull that off, Congratulations. You solved the "what if"-problem, in Aircraft construction.

@cellokid5104

3 ай бұрын

YF?

I'll start thinking about being worried about the "Checkmate" when it actually flies.

@spikymikie

2 жыл бұрын

Twenty years from now.....

@xiaoxiagao1254

2 жыл бұрын

For now its just a 10-move setup...

@Chris58851

2 жыл бұрын

When it flies, Covid-19 probably wiped out human being

@chattyknight9559

2 жыл бұрын

Lockheed Martin working on the FR-72.

@SmotritelMayaka29

2 жыл бұрын

This is what was said in 2015 when Putin spoke about the "Poseidon nuclear torpedo"(Status-6). Now the former skeptics are looking at the working torpedo in horror.

You have to build more than 8 of them like the T14 armata tank.

@gaoxiaen1

11 ай бұрын

The Turd-14 hasn't advanced to testing stage yet, and it's already failing.

They will leave a special blank spot on the dash for pilots to mount their commercial GPS units on the 3 production units they will take 18 years to build.

Interesting aircraft. In theory, it has very good specs. We’ll see how it all eventuates over coming years of testing.

@jamesmcgee1566

2 жыл бұрын

Russia can't afford this project

@tophatv2902

2 жыл бұрын

@Tylon Holmes lol i love the derailing topic. this isn't about healthcare, Russian healthcare is awful too but unlike russia us can afford 800+ jets without its economy collapsing,

@Blackholee-kc4op

2 жыл бұрын

@@tophatv2902 Естественно при таких бюджетах они очень хотят воевать(я про США), и Россия при бюджете в несколько раз меньше всё равно обходит США в некоторых структурах. При таких бюджетах, которые США выделяет на армию в год можно было бы уже медицину бесплатной сделать. Но нет, США будет говорить о том, что им нужна мощная армия на триллионы долларов. Я очень люблю, когда сравнивают Страны по количеству танков самолётов и т.п. Ну много у вас самолётов, молодцы. Системам ПВО России хотяб разогреться дадите.

@vignasimp2835

2 жыл бұрын

@@Blackholee-kc4op those air defeenses are gettting rekt by some dudes with bayraktars

@Blackholee-kc4op

2 жыл бұрын

@@vignasimp2835 c400 or c500 or 550 ? no

No offence, but some bragging the air superiority out of the US with RUS, I immediately thought of Vietnamese using 2 outdated subsonic Mig-17s vs F-4s or F-105s. Migs were always outnumbered by the US in 1:12 ratio , but managed to do so much damage to the US. You can have all the funny gadgets and AI, but pilots are pilots.

@socotroquito2007

2 жыл бұрын

Shhh ….. , nobody who watches History Channel knows that….. 😏

@nickkung8041

2 жыл бұрын

Same as Israel six-day war, Israel also outnumbered by the arabs, it is about the pilots

@user-xj9lp3fs7m

2 жыл бұрын

pretty sure its about how you treat your enemies. ive seen many americans underestimating their opponents

@user-xj9lp3fs7m

2 жыл бұрын

@Brian Roome either way the soviet tech indeed did many damage to the us back then (?)

@huuduyvu9714

2 жыл бұрын

@Brian Roome 1:12 number ratio, 2:1 kill ratio means 1:6 of actual K/D rate, dude. Take some maths. Or in this case, can't swallow the truth against White Supremacist about "the US is invicible" arrogance, you could say.

Russia has only enough money to make animations of cool planes.

In the Checkmates glossy ad they used an image of a RAF 617 Squadron F-35 patch, someone in Russia didn't do their research properly 🤣🤣

Several problems I can see plaguing this aircraft. IF, and it’s a big if, Russia can pull this off at a $30 million price point, AND meet all of its specifications it claims it can achieve, it will be beyond impressive, considering they have yet to do it with the Su-57, of which only 14 have been built to date (which only have 2 units that are combat-ready, 12 used for training craft), and they have struggled to build even those numbers. Mind you, this hasn’t even flown yet. No flight testing has occurred. They are years away from mass producing this fighter, and it may not even see flight before the advent of sixth-generation fighter jets, which China, the UK, France, and the US are already developing (the US already announcing they have test flown a sixth-gen prototype). It may be outdated before it even leaves the ground. I would be very surprised if it can meet the $30 million price point without making significant sacrifices in capability, or Russia pressing forward, and omitting certain technologies initially promised to bring down the cost. Like I said, they haven’t been able to do it with the Su-57 yet, which is likely going to sell closer to $70 million/unit, up from the $50 million price point initially advertised. That said, if this is what Russia claims it to be, and they can field it in comparable numbers to rival the F-35, which has over 700 produced as of November 2021, and over a half-dozen buyers, it could be a beast, and a formidable rival. But I’ll believe it when I see it… If I see it. As I said earlier, we’re still waiting on the Su-57, which still has no foreign buyers. And with no foreign buyers, neither program will be a serious rival to the F-22/F-35, or even the J-20.

@stellarcollapse

2 жыл бұрын

I'm more worried about what China has, rather than Russia.

@peterbruno657

2 жыл бұрын

The F 35 was better than this with a 45 million price target when it was a concept. Compromises in performance and increases in cost are always part of going from prototype to production. The SU 75 hasn't even reached the prototype stage yet. Russia loves to announce new weapons and brag about capabilities but their stuff rarely proves it's effectiveness in actual combat. The Russian military is only modern if you count ambitious projects as operational weapons. If you look at what they actually uses, it's all good war era stuff.

@katrinapaton5283

2 жыл бұрын

And now war with Ukraine has left Russia in a situation where they can't even supply munitions for their troops and anything that isnt assault rifles and ammo for same is almost impossible to produce. All that high tech electronics they're claiming will be a feature are now probably out of reach as the west cuts off sales. I rekkon its dead in the water at this point and even if it isnt lets remember the Tu22, a supersonic bomber capable of bombing the USA from bases in Russia which, if propoganda was to be believed, they'd have 800 of by 1960. I mean, it WAS supersonic...

@NANIutd08

2 жыл бұрын

@@peterbruno657+ You are spot on Peter! I think Russia have built a couple of impressive looking Rolling display pieces. I think their ever crippling Financial Sanctions & Global Isolation is forcing them back decades in the world of Weapons Advancement! I believe this is a technique we'll be seeing a lot more of! Designing & building fancy concepts, give them a big public launch just to try & project a false image to other nations. The (SU-57) Is Basically An (SU-35) In A (F-22 RAPTOR) Style Fancy Dress Costume. I (Personally) feel Russia builds the (Sexiest Looking) fighter jets in the world, BUT they simply do not have the Engines & Avionics to compliment these creations. & this is only going to get worse!

@jackfromthejungle7538

Жыл бұрын

My thoughts exactly, how is a new entry in the Sukhoi line something to think about when the last one has barely made its mark

Yeah… let’s keep Russian aviation history in mind. Each time they’ve announced a tech leap it’s been a lot less when the “announcement” hit the streets. I’m old enough to remember the Mig 25. Higher, faster and scary. And when a Russian pilot landed, one in Japan and the US took a look at it, it ended up being a POS with a big pair of engines. It could only do that super performance a couple times before they had to replace the engines. What it did do was spur the development of the F-15 eagle. Which launched in 1976/77 Bitburg, Germany. I was lucky enough to have been stationed near by when that happened. I would not be surprised if the bark is way worse than the bite yet again.

America: hey Russia we have the F-35 Russia: Oh yeah , we have Checkmate….on paper😂😂😂

Little correction.. the MAKS Airshow is not every year, it is all two years.

It doesnt look ANYTHING like the F-35. It looks similar to the SU-57, which is the point as it's sharing a lot of tech/design from that platform which keeps its cost low.

@myusername3689

2 жыл бұрын

It’s like a thinner X-32

@la7dfa

2 жыл бұрын

Russia has a couple of operational SU-57's. Now their economy is "Check mate", so this design is a paper tiger sales pitch.

@amir021idm

Жыл бұрын

@@la7dfa the russian economy now is at its peak high because of gas and oil prices, i wonder where you get your information from

@lennymegakill9580

Жыл бұрын

@@amir021idm you mean zhe oil and gas nobody is buying from them

@amir021idm

Жыл бұрын

@@lennymegakill9580 when i buy things from the store i can afford whatever i want that’s what important for me, unlike other countries

A little bit too late. When this goes out, 6th gens will be starting their test flights

Like virtually all Russian military equipment this jet is almost certainly given far more credit that it’s due

@dionross1241

Жыл бұрын

Whatever

@rizzzzzza4643

Жыл бұрын

@@dionross1241 😢😢😢😢 cry more

@dondarko7885

Жыл бұрын

@@dionross1241 Мат! Ukrainian for Checkmate!

@Zx17OPv57i

Жыл бұрын

@@rizzzzzza4643 cry more ?

@sr71lockheed80

Жыл бұрын

😂as if the ones from nato aren't over hyped

The air inlet reminds me of the American x-32 when they tried air-2-air refueling the refueling thing headed for the massive air intake on the x-32, which was a little bit concerning for the pilot.

@TornaitSuperBird

5 ай бұрын

It just wanted to take a big sip

Doesn't seem like a lot of exotic technologies. Not including finicky nonsense like making the frame adaptable for multiple configurations, including a VTOL version, can save a lot of time. A standard stealth aircraft body plan by any measure. Even the ruddervators have historically worked with the YF-23, meaning it can be done. Russian stealth has typically been a painted on coating, so less time needed to innovate some kind of stealth material (which they're not promising anyway). I can see them flying in 2023, at the very least meeting the brief of a 'first flight' with a bare bones aircraft with stealth coating.

@deeacosta2734

2 жыл бұрын

Anything can fly by 2023.

@carlosandleon

2 жыл бұрын

2023? I'd give it more time than that. But definitely simplicity is their selling factor if the price is appropriately low as well

@michaelkatz275

2 жыл бұрын

Stealth paint is a less effective method of reducing a radar signature as opposed to using stealth materials. Both are known to degrade as time passes.

@newguy954

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelkatz275 I remember a f-35 documentary where a spokesman is saying 70% of stealth is the shape of the aircraft so it won't even matter,but I don't know they might decent stealth coating for the su-57 and the su-75 we"ll just have to wait and watch till it's first flight.

@michaelkatz275

2 жыл бұрын

@@newguy954 Yes, in the past that has been true. But now it is less so I understand due to the development of new materials. One of the reasons that the F-35 is limited to Mach 1.6 is that stealth materials have a habit of flying off the aircraft at high Mach numbers.

I always think this flightier is a perfect match with the Chinese up coming LHD 076, if the Russian mil-30 can be bk on track , then it might become a game changer.

@hollowgonzalo4329

7 ай бұрын

@et9953 Could be. It would maks a decent stopgap between some of the more outdated late Soviet 4th gen designs of the J-1X series and the more recent Chinese 5th gen stealth designs. That of course hinges on the assumption that Russia is capable of mass producing the thing and that it lives up to expectations.

It looks pretty much PRECISELY like a 50/50 mix of Lockheed Martin and Boeing Prototypes. Pretty cool!

The name of the fighter aircraft is "Checkmate". The word "Checkmate" originates from Persian "Shah Mat" meaning "King is helpless" and the game of Chess itself originated in India...So, judging by the name the main market for this aircraft will be India and Iran.

@02suraditpengsaeng41

Жыл бұрын

well, Russia close friend undoubtable

@softdrink-0

Жыл бұрын

It’s not that deep

Too bad they can’t fund the project anymore except for the wooden mock-up model….also did anyone notice the striking similarities to the Boeing X32 prototype that lost to the F35?

This is a 4.5 generation fighter. The IR done is still round making it highly reflective to radar.

0:28 *outer wing pylons* "stealth"

@sidharthcs2110

2 жыл бұрын

That doesn't mean it'll have those outer pylons all the time. Just like the F35

@randompheidoleminor3011

2 жыл бұрын

The model was made by this channel so the blame's kinda on them

@blinthepannkek6173

2 жыл бұрын

Stelf

@oxcart4172

2 жыл бұрын

They're made of wood

@dankshark4808

2 жыл бұрын

Someone's is stupid enough to not understand that this was an animation made of su 75 and the plane wont using them when it's on Stealth mode

It looks a lot like the YF 32. The plane that lost out to the F 35.

@SIGNALFREQ

2 жыл бұрын

Because it is...they stole the plans🤯

@kryse4806

2 жыл бұрын

x-32*, and yes it does. when he said "it looks like the f35" im like, no, that stupid mouth clearly shows its dad is the x-32

@grujicdanijel7963

2 жыл бұрын

Looks nothing like YF-23 , not to mention this is single engine and YF was double engined...

@3nglehart

2 жыл бұрын

while the X-35 looks like the Yak 141 while this looks like the X-32 minus the big mouth

@maratkard

2 жыл бұрын

It does not. It has other wings in different position, another nose. The idea is the same: 1-engine fighter with the smiley face in the front and the pitch-elevators, but the realization is completely different

"The 75 in the name is the amount of years Sukhoi will need to make an actual stealth fighter, because they clearly don't know how to make one after the failure of the Su57. I see you over there, don't try and sneak up on me." - Tym3 Glitch

The F-35 is far from a failure

@nathanielweber7843

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, I’ll never get how the people who subscribe to Pierre spray can call the most commercially successful and massed produced stealth fighter in history a flop

@jgarbo3541

Жыл бұрын

Right. It's a close failure. Still not operational.

@elihernandez330

Жыл бұрын

It hardly works

@AuroraTheRobot

Жыл бұрын

@@elihernandez330 If it hardly works then why do countries keep buying it?

@kandd2591

Жыл бұрын

@@elihernandez330 What about it hardly works then

Unlike the the F 35 , which is not a single engined F22 , Checkmate is more like a single engined SU 57. Which will help reduce development time. And it's very much export oriented.

@laynestaley4957

Жыл бұрын

I think of the SU-75 as more like the SU-57 if the Russian Federation had been patient and waited a few more years. They could've had this plane a little later, but they got stuck with the SU-57...now the SU-57 is a great plane and probably better than every 4th gen fighter in the world, but it's not a good 5th gen fighter!

@aldenunion

10 ай бұрын

Air inlet sucks in air great from straight ahead,but amending direction amends flo RATE and that checkmate 75 Chyte..ABSOLUTE GOB CHYTE..Like news saying Putin's regime crumbling,these designs are same media swill for dumbies..

@swiffersweatjet7815

9 ай бұрын

@@laynestaley4957 the Su-57 isn't a bad 5th gen, its just not a 5th gen, it has the RCS of a 4th gen.

Checkmate is a PRO level marketing move. Love it.

@covidhoax7646

2 жыл бұрын

Not really. Very amateurish.

@02suraditpengsaeng41

Жыл бұрын

. Hostile Pilot >

@gaoxiaen1

11 ай бұрын

Just like all the Russian Pros working in brothels worldwide.

Every American afraid of CLOWNS is terrified of SMILEmate X32 wannabe...

SU-75 clearly doesn’t have dental insurance

Hi, really like your video as usual. But I have noticed one little mistake. MAKS is not an annual airshow. It is organized every two years. Greetings from Russia :)

@shimadwan8251

2 жыл бұрын

I hope Su75 it sells like Mig21

@flogger8413

2 жыл бұрын

@@shimadwan8251 if you havent realized. The Su-75 is technically a stealth Mig-21

@mikailvito7200

2 жыл бұрын

@@flogger8413 lol i sure hope it's not any way like a MiG-21 those things drop like flies

Let me add a few points regarding this video: 1) MAKS is held once every 2 years, not every year. 2) The Su-75 Checkmate has been in R&D for quite some time, basically developed in parallel with Su-57 and the UCAV «Okhotnik», and they all share quite a lot in terms of design and materials, this is why Rostec is quite confident in its 2023 first flight. Most of the heavy engineering work has already been done. 3) The Su-75 Checkmate aims at export sales mainly, just like the Mig-29/35 used to. The Russia air force doesn't really use single engine fighters, opting for heavier, multi role twin engine fighters. 4) As I mentioned in point 2, most of the R&D has already been done for parallel projects, so I am sure that the AI that will be used in the Su-75 checkmate, will probably be similar to the one, developed for the UCAV «Okhotnik». 5) The cost of the Su-75 will be quite «affordable» in comparison to the F-35 because a sizeable part of the R&D has already been done on the Su-57 program. 6) The relatively low price of the Su-75, along with its quite interesting characteristics, and the promise of adaptability to the buyer's requests, will allow a lot of armies to afford 5th gen fighters, so the list of possible clients is huge. Algeria, Egypt, Lybia, along with other African nations, Syria, Iraq, and other Arab countries, Vietnam, India, Armenia, Argentina, Kazakhstan, Venezuela, etc... Quite a big pool. None of the NATO countries though, these are tied to the US and are obligated to purchase US planes (the only real competitor to the US inside NATO is France with Dassault Aviation, but they are still working on a 5th gen plane, which might appear in about a decade or so).

@andymacmac9151

2 жыл бұрын

Since when have NATO nations been obligated to purchase US planes? What a load of tosh…..

@MrRight-fu1gf

2 жыл бұрын

@@andymacmac9151 Since always. Turkey was sanctioned for buying non NATO. You can’t be that stupid.

@andymacmac9151

2 жыл бұрын

@@MrRight-fu1gf who is the stupid one…. Try reading my response to the original question, to your comment. NATO nations can buy non US equipment if they want to…

@vladimirnikolskiy

2 жыл бұрын

@@andymacmac9151 Yes, they can, with the exception of Russian combat systems.

@TheMartuksxxxx

2 жыл бұрын

@@MrRight-fu1gf polish are literally operating migs, they dont seen to buy nato

Su-75 Checkmate = Boeing F-32 + Lockheed Martin F-35 + Northrop Grumman YF-23 (Design Wise: Big Air Intake(F-32), Normal Stealth Design(F-35), V-Shaped Tail(YF-23))

The checkmate is more of a russian heavily upgraded f16, rather than a f35 equivalent...

A very impressive and beautiful aircraft. Unfortunately, it has one problem - it doesn't exist.

@ebiyeyanga8003

2 жыл бұрын

All aircraft never existed in the first place.

@lauranydb7979

2 жыл бұрын

My thoughts exactly, a scare tactic....they take our old found jets left at bases and reverse engineer them, always behind us.

@otvinta

2 жыл бұрын

Well, same was once said for many of the already existing Russia's modern weapons and military equipment, mostly just by some trolls and not real experts. Chances are high to see Su-75 first test flight next year already.

@ebiyeyanga8003

2 жыл бұрын

@@otvinta When people speak truth, Russians would call them trolls and traitors. I'm sure the Soviet Union still exists only in Russia.

@theswagman1263

2 жыл бұрын

@@lauranydb7979 sounds like you love that sweet US propaganda. MUH F22

Small amendment. This aircraft is primarily aimed at selling abroad. For third countries, SU-57 is expensive. Therefore, the manufacturer did not make this commercial project by order from the Ministry of Defense, as usual, but on an initiative basis independently and expressed the hope that the Russian armed forces would also show interest in this aircraft. Be specific in the comments.

@softballm1991

Жыл бұрын

The last Stealth airframe Russia built was th SU-57 they had one count it one partner: India. India pulled out and is now buy French Mirage.

@PD-yd3fr

5 ай бұрын

India cancelled their Su 57s because they thought they were scrap

An F-35 will have detected you and sent a missile after you long before you even knew it was there. It can also fire a missile from any direction, making dogfighting obsolete. It's a 5th generation fighter and does its job well

@matitjamatheson4395

11 ай бұрын

You are literally arguing about opinion

@Expunge6667

11 ай бұрын

@@matitjamatheson4395 those are facts. There's nothing about my opinion in there. Learn what the word "Literally" means before using it. You look like a buffoon.

jet fighter with external pylons can't be stealth at all, and with external loading it loose all superiority comparing to 4th gen jets.

Visually it looks like a stretched Boeing F-32 , the plane that everyone laughed at . Cockpit , intake , wings, tails ..............................................this is beautiful , hope they build it ..💛💙

Although similar in appearance, the F-35 is also able to operate as a VTOL aircraft which enables it to operate in areas that are more restrictive than many other aircraft are capable of. We are really comparing apples with oranges here, unless the Checkmate is also capable of hovering as well, then it only resembles the F-35. It would be much more impressive if it was actually an operative aircraft, but since it has not yet made it to the assembly line, it is premature to be touting it’s prowess. Thank you for posting these videos! Please have an excellent and awesome day! ☀️

@WiLDCATZ

2 жыл бұрын

This is true but only the marine version F35 does the VTOL for use on the smaller carrier/assault ships they use. The B variant. The Navy C and Air Force A models shed that capability to save weight and due to their very different needs and use conventional take off and landing, the C being reinforced for catapulting off carriers. The F35 is a jack of all trades platform. He also mentioned it's an air superiority fighter which it really isn't. The F22 is THE world's greatest air superiority fighter, not the 35. Analogous to the Su-57 class and the F15EX to the Su-35 class in the 4++ category. Navy is gonna be keeping their Hornets for awhile to supplement the 35s.

@SephirothRyu

2 жыл бұрын

The fact that it isn't trying to do as much likely will make the "Checkmate" cheaper to make than the F-35 even if it has basically the same abilities as the A Model. Even before considering that there may be less costs of the greedy/corruption type involved, and that they likely have been able to skip on some development due to using the existing F-35's shape as a starting point to work with. Not sure why there are so many comments assuming that Russia cannot actually afford to develop something at least comparable to the F-35, while just being a one-size-fits-all non-S/VTOL fighter. Look, nothing against the F-35, the things are pretty amazing, but being the first guy to make something (especially if you jam it full of so many brand new features and have multiple variants) will generally make it more costly then being the second guy to make something.

@SephirothRyu

2 жыл бұрын

@@WiLDCATZ Since you brought up the F22, I'll just blab my opinion that the F-23 would have been better.

@user-ce2vx7fo6h

2 жыл бұрын

Mike Carbone,LOL! Checkmate is similar to the YAK 141! Which, 30 years later , the United States was able to copy and make F35

@user-os6ch5pt7w

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ce2vx7fo6h Really? The YAK-141 is a copy of the Convair Model 200A, down to the P&W designed and patented three bearing swivel nozzle, and the single stage front lift double engines. The SU-75 is a copy of the Northrop MRF-54E (1991-1993). Russia can do nothing but copy, because your gene pool is a sewage pit after the Bolshevik Revolution and WWII.

Pretty insane to build a cardboard mock-up and call it a plane actually.

USA: “Oh no… anyway.”

This concept is in no way shape or form a threat to F-35 sales. By the time this thing comes online, the F-35 will be operational for some 20 years and receive it's first MLU updates and will e a proven platform. FurthermoreRussian and American fighter platforms don't compete in the same markets (with a few exceptions). the next problem for this Russian concept will be china, since China already surpassed Russia in almost every field of combat aircraft technology and 15 years from now russia will not be able to keep pace with Chinese technology anymore.

@xyzaero9656

Жыл бұрын

@Jasper Percabeth In 15 years Russia will be the lapdog of China following whatever China dictates. There will be no working together, Russia will ne happy if they will be allowed to WORK FOR China. Russian technology is so far behind thst it does matter very little today and will be no relevant in 15 years. China is the next contender to be the West‘s main foe but still stands little chance.

12:56 they decided to replace it with the f-22, then the f-35 and now another f-16. What a great idea, right!

@King_Flippy_Nips

2 жыл бұрын

they almost decided to ressurrect the canadian avro arrow and give it some upgrades instead of choosing the f-35, even after 60 years a few upgrades and modern avionics and the avro arrow could easily contend with fifth generation fighters for a fraction of the cost, but uncle sam doesnt like competition, they always pressured foreign countries to not invest or buy from canada and they helped scrap the cl-84 which was canadas vtol craft that the osprey was based on decades later and they also pressured diefenbaker to scrap the avro arrow program which spelled the end for canadas aerospace industry, at that time canada was a world leader and had the worlds 4th largest airforce, were the 3rd country to launch a sattelite into space and after the avro arrow program was scrapped and 17,500 people were left jobless the best of the industry moved to the US and joined NASA and were instrumental in the success of the space program and the moon landing.

This aircraft was originally developed for sale to developing countries. The Russian Defense Ministry did not order this aircraft. At the first presentation, the manufacturer expressed the hope that the Russian Ministry of Defense would also be interested in this aircraft.

Ah yes, the wooden mockup with a double chin for an air intake

No way of telling until they actually build the thing. Anyone can say "I'm going to build a fighter, and it's going to be futuristic and better than everyone else's fighter" but actually building the thing is a different story.

@bobzang5255

2 жыл бұрын

Seriously, It sounds like children having an imaginary battle, they hope they can sell these things based on theory. Reminds me a lot of Tesla Semi.

@laynestaley4957

Жыл бұрын

They will probably never build it. Its first prototype is slated to be built only 5-10 years away from the US's sixth gen fighter.

Maybe. The one thing though is that it's going to have a lot of issues when first produced. The F35 and F-22 had a lot of kinks worked out over the years making them much better planes then when they first came out

@saul3332

Жыл бұрын

It hasn't flown. How would you know how it would perform It may never fly The Russians don't have the technology that we have in the USA That's why they are losing in the Ukraine.

@trajhenkhet02

Жыл бұрын

@@saul3332 That's why it's a maybe. Out the gate it's a no way. The F-22 stealth + long range targeting + hypersonic missile capability is going to be hard for the checkmate to not be checkmated. The first strike advantage is huge on the f-22. I'm sort of hoping the 6th gen fighter program is just upgrades to the f-22 and f-35 with the f-16 and f-15 getting upgrades as well. We have a diminishing returns problem in terms of piloted fighter air craft regarding all humanity. The F-22 took a long time to develope as did the f-35 (in the case of f-35, it took multinational funds to build it.). For another nation to top that they would need multiple nations funding and research done by engineering marvels like the real Tesla. No nation on Earth but the US could do this. IMO 6th gen fighters would have the ability to launch and command drones while maintaining stealth. The F-22s internal bays already allow for this. I believe the 5th gen fighters of Russia and China aren't all that 5th gen. The US should double up the amount of f-22s they already have especially if the can get them to hold and deploy hypersonic missiles.

@_Epsilon_

Жыл бұрын

@@saul3332 _ It may never fly The Russians don't have the technology that we have in the USA_ Russians don't have technology to make aircrafts fly? lol? You could say Russia doesn't have money (which is also incorrect, Russia swims in money and is virtually debt free) but not this. _That's why they are losing in the Ukraine._ You need to get better sources than yahoo news. I'd argue Russia while using very small forces does a lot more impressive vs NATO run Ukraine (largest country in Europe with the 2nd largest army in Europe if you didn't know) than US did againt Iraq in 1991 that had no modern equipment no S-300, no Buk, easy geography (just flat desert), and millions of American hostages. It took them 6 months.

@_Epsilon_

Жыл бұрын

@@trajhenkhet02 _That's why it's a maybe. Out the gate it's a no way. The F-22 stealth + long range targeting + hypersonic missile capability is going to be hard for the checkmate to not be checkmated. The first strike advantage is huge on the f-22._ Raptor has short legs, might not even reach Russia's main cities from Poland or Norway. Its main enemy would be S-350, S-400 and maybe S-500. But Russia might not even let F-22 to take off the ground, and NATO isn't known for its air-defence to stop a salvo of cruise missiles especially hypersonic ones (which is unstoppable by definition). Same goes for F-35, majority will be destroyed on the ground. So yeah Russian planes might be least of their problems.

Chess is a 2d game. Checkmate is created on a 2d chess game. Similarly, the 75 will probably stay on a 2d surface without ever flying.

@02suraditpengsaeng41

11 ай бұрын

Bruh XD

Yeah, well on paper MY JET, the F-U 69 model 420, IS WAAAAAY better than the F-35 and F-22 and even the famous Russian Felon. It has two .50 cal rotary cannons, an automatic napalm launcher and an inside bay that can deliver up to sixteen tomahawks and then Air to Air weapons and of course it's VTOL capable and has all the bells and whistles plus more of all the other planes including an automatic bj machine, a blunt roller and a humidor, and a mini fridge and bar for martinis in combat. And it goes invisible when I press a button. It doesn't have an ejection mode though, the entire jet just teleports back to base right before a missile can hit it.

I believe the the Soviet design bureaus were always interested in the F-16 design and there is no reason why they would not still be in today’s Russia!

@Mikhelinx

2 жыл бұрын

It’s not all about hand designed to copy. Soviet used the same hydroplaning software in the wind tunnel computer Aid to help designing itself that all looking similar. Soviets had many formerly Nazi German designers. The USA is not a Superman.

@joeclaridy

2 жыл бұрын

Why were they so interested?

@ulrichkristensen4087

Жыл бұрын

@@joeclaridy because it is properly one of the best planes from teh cold war period, it has proven itself again and again