Men like this make me thankful to have a thinking brain.

Jesus. Anyone translating our dear Slavoj's speech into sign language deserves a raise.

@AiChiomi

9 жыл бұрын

Or at least to be in the frame of the recording.

@andrewroberts8139

8 жыл бұрын

+Brett Crehan Seems pretty lucid to me.

@deadmeat1471

6 жыл бұрын

lol

@yvesnyfelerph.d.8297

4 жыл бұрын

He makes the most of what little he can. His words are eloquent. You cannot fault his style. His delivery is flawless. As far as I can see, there is nothing that would make any reasonable person disagree with Zizek's analysis of history, philosophy, politics or social institutions. There is no need to say anything more, really. It is a simple and brilliant explanation of our current situation and a clear argument for the necessity of revolution. One that is utterly convincing, even to someone like me who has the most fundamental of misgivings about politics.

@johnlavers3970

2 жыл бұрын

that's just dumb

Zizek spittin pure GAME at the beginning

The woman hired to do the deaf signing had her work cut out for her. On that note, at times Zizek almost does his own signing!

@yvesnyfelerph.d.8297

4 жыл бұрын

This isn't even the first time he's done it! The woman's response to this gesture? "No, you are not a sign-writer" The video concludes with a few more scenes of her signing, including "I am your enemy" and "I hate you" (the last of which is apparently her last word to Zizek). The title of the video is in reference to the book "The Master of Disguise" by the French anarchist Georges Sorel, which tells the story of a young man who signs in order to infiltrate the Nazis in order to save the life of his girlfriend.

From Trinidad and I admire Slavok with joy and obsession. His observations are imperfectly perfect🙂

Wipe nose, pull shirt, wipe forehead. Repeat, but never rinse.

@AiChiomi

9 жыл бұрын

and so on and so on.

@mrtaurus51

8 жыл бұрын

+agun17 ... His gestures remind me of Pina Bausch's choreographies .... :)

@AMpufnstuf

8 жыл бұрын

+agun17 AND IM SURE YOU KNOW *COKE SNIFF* THE FAMOUS STORY OF THE MAN WHO HAD NO BALLS

@amypellegrini1732

7 жыл бұрын

"again"

@jacobjorgenson9285

6 жыл бұрын

And go waaaaay beyond your comprehension. But keep trying

Excellent. I haven't seen this lecture in a few years. His affinity with Christianity is powerful when he takes the believers for a ride to contemporary thought. It is wonderful that believers recognize his thought as important.

@yvesnyfelerph.d.8297

4 жыл бұрын

If you want to know the truth about Jesus and Christianity, then Zizek has you covered. He offers more and deeper knowledge of the faith than many of his critics, and does so in a way that is clear and simple to grasp. I am glad I went.

Zizek's missing Rumsfeld diagram element, the Unknown Knowns IMHO are covered when William Burroughs quipped that 'Art is what we already know, but we don't know that we know it.'

@farrider3339

11 ай бұрын

¹ There are known Known's (There are thing's we know that we know). ²There are known Unknown's (There are thing's that we know, we don't know). ³ There are unknown Unknown's (There are thing's we don't know, that we don't know). IV There are thing's that are unknown Known's (There are thing's that we know, but we don't even know that we know them). THiS iS iDEOLOGY ❗️ IVa Things we believe without believing. The crucial problem of believing : When our act's do not match our conviction's and/or believe's. Master Zizek 🛐

incredibly informative and clear! Delighted

1:48:00 "for the fake of argument" -> for the sake of argument. priceless

@lifeisclimbing

2 жыл бұрын

and so...?

recorded with a rock

@Zach-wr6fw

3 жыл бұрын

Better audio than many lectures I’ve heard on KZread

@droid16beta97

Жыл бұрын

No, he just looks like that

veeeery precise

I identify a lot with this talk... I hate those “between the lines” rules, as he called the “meta rules”. I like precise communication. This stuff reminds me a lot of Larry David also and his hilarious show “Curb your Enthusiasm” which is all about these social complications.

@criztu

9 жыл бұрын

Juan Gonzalez read Nietzsche's Master Slave Morality. Most of Zizek's discourse applies to the Slave, not to the Master.

@UnchainedDreamer-we2fy

8 жыл бұрын

+criztu who discourses on the 'master morality' in todays age then?

@criztu

8 жыл бұрын

Unchained Dreamer 8911 I donno man... but when Zizek is telling me at 46:55 "Even if we claim to not believe (in God), we have the need for another one to believe", I recognize the Slave morality right there. The Slave morality is that of the "herd", as in Zizek's "the need for another one to blabla what we can't admit to ourselves". The Master morality would be the one of the "shepherd", in which the shepherd does not need the herd to believe for him, he simply uses the herd to make a better life for himself, nobody else above him.

@julesfreis6813

8 жыл бұрын

And the restaurant bill paying is from Seinfeld.

@alinbarba1418

3 жыл бұрын

I think Zizek said that the meta rules are what gives a culture its life and character, you move to Germany and you aren't a German when you know the rules, you become a German when you know how to break the rules like a German.

Zizek says in words what I never thought existed in my mind.

Great, Great intro!!!!

VERY GOOD

Such an interesting video - un(focus) throughout the whole time - it makes the point even more poignant..... The pressure of meaning....

Great crowd!

I would like to know the name of the professor who presented S Z

He constantly and almost by reflex goes into the Polish trope of everything Soviet bad, as if to inoculate the listener, reader of any suspicious "original sin" in his untainted by Russia brand of "Marxism". Works well for his audience and makes his non-pc discourse palatable. I'm aware he's not Polish, btw.

dramatic final moment

Zizek at 5:20

@ffelegal

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much lol

@marcostorrestaboada5502

3 жыл бұрын

thankkkk youuuuu

What college was this done at and when?

Slavoj doesn't get enough sleep!

17:50 wow this is so true , considering what is really happening in the world today....

Why is the janitor talking on the podium?

Surgery vivesection examination tearing apart at times ...

Fully pixelized video with Zizek having a not fully grey beard. How old is this recording?

@Qvmmy

3 жыл бұрын

almost 20yo ı believe

@handyalley2350

3 жыл бұрын

2006

If I knew he did this speech I would have walked to Grand Rapids.

Name of the lady that gave the introduction?

1:34:41 the reason why you never enjoy parent enforced activities (football, hockey, ballet, skating) when you’re a teenager, especially when you were interested in it in the first place

Britney Spears' Rule of Government lol

Did anybody ever mention how similar he looks to Luke Skywalker?

@farrider3339

11 ай бұрын

Yeah, however Luke was a burnt out dork not knowing what to do after his glorious battles and victories. In contrast to "oh it's all meaningless snowflake Luke" Zizek is a continues heavy explosion on precisely the same meaninglessness. Z : 1 L : 0 😂

1:28 is Schelling's view...a good view

when was this recorded?

@handyalley2350

3 жыл бұрын

2006

I hate the between the lines rules too we should outgrow them.

Thats interesting.

I'm coming to the conclusion that Zizek is like a big unorganised compost heap of ideas...he's forever going off on tangents...but occasionally he brings up the gold (which perhaps in the compost analogy is like a fungal network) which makes sense of it all. Ideology as unknown knowns. Disgust as the very human feeling which comes from when the frontier between the inside and outside is breached.

Great taken down of Sam Harris' superficial atheism at 1:03:20

slavoj’s video quality looking like fidel castro

1:41:39 ... hey, that's John Green!

26:00 - "disturbed the balance of Neil Young"???

@hetmanjz

7 жыл бұрын

Haha, "yin(g) yang."

@sullivansongz

7 жыл бұрын

+Jan Zamojski 😌Thanks for clearing that up

@hetmanjz

7 жыл бұрын

éanna o'sullivan No problem!

Good talk but holy shit why do the Bohr/toilet bits have to work their way into every damn public appearance

1:04:00 Talking about Sam Harris' "End of Faith".

Got it

At 22:35 ish to 22:00 he is critiquing Alan Watts lololol. I appreciate it though!

@turgayulusoy9783

5 жыл бұрын

me to! it is hard to go back in time.

@JamonJamoni

3 жыл бұрын

T

1:33:24 no wonder he chose Blue Velvet as one of the movies in perverts guide to cinema

So the ideological significance of 911- any thoughts people? Wish Zizek had elaborated (of course, the mujahideen were at one point on American payroll, but whatever)

someone make a gif 1:57:00

Ok, he makes one think about it but his point is not valid: why should not Job's trial have a deeper meaning (for example material wealth vs obedience and closeness to one's true self/God?)

@matthewfrazier9254

6 жыл бұрын

blerocs that’s just not in the text my bro bro

Zizek seems to be saying, like Hegel, that god is being, that is, that god is not a transcendent thing but exists in the interactions between humans. This however leads to the problem of freedom as necessity, unless freedom is merely the arbitrary 'do whatever you like,' which no one would accept and Hegel calls a limited freedom or no freedom at all. But, spirit as freedom or as god does not accord with the notion of Christ's death as a giving to humans their freedom, that is, making them responsible for what they do. The perspective from Christ as he dies on the cross or during the scourge is not comprehensible as compassion for man. Anyway, humans cannot be said to have internalized any of this god-talk as they terrorize and murder each other constantly. Zizek's discussion of god and freedom is hypocritical because he readily acknowledges that a 'confession' that is too deep, too internal, is irrelevant to action, yet he engages in it.

has anyone here watched “the reluctant fundamentalist “?

@WindsongPodcast

Жыл бұрын

No what's that about?

Sturgeon's Law LMAO

Jijek?

@RodrigoOrtizSalema

4 жыл бұрын

Yep

22:27 SZ completely misunderstood the Book of Job if he is skipping the introduction. The devil, in the introduction, is the primary antagonist and philosopher examining human behavior. And like a philosopher, the devil believes human behavior is understood by him and that man will fold to pressure. To say there is no deeper meaning to Job's suffering betrays ignorance of the story.

From back in the days when he would actually show up places prepared to make a point.

@inquisitorwhitemane9722

8 жыл бұрын

+Erik Beck I wasn't aware that he changed in that regard (considering I listen to his lectures in random order), but I have to say this is definitely the most coherent presentation I've seen so far. Quite insightful really.

The Jews were repeatedly expelled by many countries/cultures and after WW2 Europeans settled on the one Zizek refers 'that the Jews wanted to mingle with the locals', as usual the European intellectuals gives the wrong interpretation. The Jews didn't want to mingle with the locals, instead they found the locals inferior and bossed over the Christians and the locals never understood who bossed over who. Marx gave the correct explanation in 'the Jewish problem', where he explained the Jewish logic of enhancing the value of money, ERRONOUSLY, the main reason why all locals hated the Jews.!!!

@farrider3339

11 ай бұрын

Envy for economic riches ? Is that all ? Well, seems very basic and sounds plausible but . . . However I agree to your description of seeing the "locals" as inferior or at least as being on THEIR ground andbyecaus of being a sheer menace to be thrown out or exploited to the bones. The one who didn't get the lesson from (his own) history, is condemned to repeat it (and will have to pay the price for this in the now and times to come).

@sonarbangla8711

11 ай бұрын

@@farrider3339 Indeed, Jews are fleeing in thousands, they are not under stupid Yankees, but has to answer to the smart Chinese.

I prefer to not.and so on and so on.

blurry ....

@pbradford021

7 жыл бұрын

thank you captain obvious.

United 93 got shot down

She is gorgeous.

Im like 12 Hours into Zizek now and on the edge of giving up. His toilette argument is insanly stupid. I asked that same question when i was 6 to my dad. He instantly concluded that it might have a Plateau, so that no Splash would happen. Zizek read to full Books about toilettes and didnt come up with that tought.

@sujalthapa7887

3 жыл бұрын

But the fact that not all toilets have it is itself sth worth examining wouldn't you say?

@handyalley2350

3 жыл бұрын

I liked zizek by the second hour in. And i thought he was a boring european old guy, from flipoing over his wiki page pic a xouple of times. No reading or hearing- just viewing from afar, imagining fictions. Try the egs lectures. Zizek's at his best.

consolidate lol

Symbolic castration

Slavoj's insistence on his atheism is one of denial. Increasingly as a Christian I find he is more so than most - its as if a man were to insist on describing an elephant but refrain from identifying it as such. Like C. S. Lewis my prayer is that he is "Surprised by Joy"

@littlefaint

9 жыл бұрын

You're misreading him: it's not that he is an atheist who DENIES his Christianity. Rather, he is a true Christian precisely BECAUSE he is atheist. For Zizek, the ultimate message of Christianity is atheism: God literally died on the cross. He is gone, forever, because that is the only way for us (humans) to be free.

@Kobe29261

9 жыл бұрын

demonessv THAT is NOT the ultimate message of Christianity; that is hijacking Christianity for political ideology. Read Karl Barth/Chesterton et al; of course Christ literally died on the cross but only in the sense of a seed dying. The emancipatory potential of Christianity lies in that a man can today live a life free from slavery through an encounter with the Holy Spirit - not merely political or ideological slavery but spiritual slavery but this is no conversation for a KZread comment section. I wish you well.

@umadumadumad

9 жыл бұрын

Anogoya Dagaati u mad?

@Kobe29261

9 жыл бұрын

umadumadumad Naa bro; its all good. I love Slavoj (although I'd probably get excommunicated reading him lol) - he forces us to think about the world in new ways. I'm thrilled that there are more and more people giving him a hearing. We need -like he keeps saying - 'theorists' such as himself. As a Christian though his caricature of Christianity is somewhat disturbing - being one of the most sincere people in the public space I think he could do better. But it is impossible to speak honestly about Christ without facing the mystery at the heart of the incarnation or as he does entirely re-imagining the phenomenon.

@haggeoromero

9 жыл бұрын

Anogoya Dagaati " As a Christian though his caricature of Christianity is somewhat disturbing" why should that bother you? you should not be disturbed at all by anything he or anyone else says about your religion. consider what a Buddhist monk or an Amish person would do when their beliefs are mocked....nothing, they do nothing. think about that.

как и сейчас.... блаблабла