Just because he’s tall doesn’t mean he can’t be intimidated. Her husband is tall and I don’t think he could bust a grape 😂

@sandylane5498

Ай бұрын

Exactly!

@kiyahbeauty9929

28 күн бұрын

😅😅😅 shots FIRED 😂

@amcgee5222

17 күн бұрын

😂😂😂

@maryjanemtz777

2 күн бұрын

😂😂😂

I can see how the old man can be intimidated by the other guy, the other guy is very greedy greedy greedy greedy

@marys4565

Ай бұрын

I know a few people who resemble the plaintiff....all have over bearing personalities....it rattles people lol...I get what the defendant is saying. Some of us chose to disassociate...doesn't make them bad people

The plaintiffs wife looks like she was being held prisoner

@vorpal22

Ай бұрын

That was exactly the impression that I got, too. She looks defeated and frightened. The plaintiff says that the defendant is making "zings" at him in court when he did that to the defendant multiple times.

@joannethomas8005

Ай бұрын

Yes she look scared

@user-fz6yg7gb2r

Ай бұрын

haha, she knows she's gonna be in trouble because he didn't get what he wanted from the case

@suzannecrum9702

Ай бұрын

Also,he is much older than the lady with him.She must be with him for the bucks.As he us not appealing at all.

I absolutely hate the "friend or no friend" thing. The plaintiff destroyed a 20 year friendship for $500

@LeviAaronx

Ай бұрын

They weren’t really friends to begin with

@editorshaaan

Ай бұрын

The friendship was over long before that

@msfranklin2650

Ай бұрын

DON'T BLAME THE PLAINTIFF OBVIOUSLY HE WAS OWED $$$ SO IT FALLS ON THE DEFENDANT STOP MAKING EXCUSES

Plaintiff acts like a total control freak, what he says goes and you can forget about it,he’s a one way street and that girl looks terrified

I hate the argument that just because you are a tall person that you aren't under duress. Just because you are big, or tall, doesn't mean you handle conflicts well and can fight. You can feel threatened and worry for your own safety and the safety of your family.

@sandylane5498

Ай бұрын

Exactly!

@augustmoon9973

Ай бұрын

Agreed! Some people, regardless of size, will avoid any potential conflict when they've seen behaviors escalate from that person previously. The plaintiff looks like a hot head, and I don't quite follow how he was awarded any additional monies. 🤔

@bjohnson1149

22 күн бұрын

Well said. I said something similar but not as well as you.

@javanburton

2 сағат бұрын

Size does pay a big part in it though.

This case was like a bad day in the accounting office 😵‍💫

Plaintiff needs to stop using words he has no idea how to use. At the end, when talking to moderator. “He proves he’s being libel to me!”

@KAKE-26

Ай бұрын

I’d check your own imperfect use of grammar, before coming for others.

@harmonynature1418

Ай бұрын

😬

@RileyCullen1

Күн бұрын

@@KAKE-26- you’re actually in the wrong. Its the meaning of words. He uses LIBEL incorrectly. Libel is writen defamatory. Slander is the verbal part. He does not use other words correctly. Next time, SHUT YOUR MOUTH IF YOU PLAN TO BE RUDE JUST FOR HER POINTING OUT HES A COMPLETE IDIOT! We are not structoring sentences buddy!

the judge messed that ruling up.

Maybe I'm just too tired to think clearly right now but the judge's math seems wrong on this one. They both initially invested $750.00. The defendant then paid the plantif a total of $2250.00. Ignoring the repair costs, the defendant has now made a total investment of $3000.00 in the boat (his original $750.00 + $2250.00). He sold it for $3400.00 earning a profit of only $400.00. Either way you look at it, the judgement ended up with the plantif receiving a total of $2826.00 from a $3400.00 sale. That sure doesn't seem like a fair and equal profit to me.

@WillGGG

Ай бұрын

The end result is wrong. The 2250 is the original 750 the defendant gave the plaintiff for the original boat purchase plus another 1500 when the defendant bought the boat outright from the plaintiff. So at this point the defendant is in for 2250 and the plaintiff has 750 profit. Add another 500 sale profit and the plaintiff made 1250 total and the defendant is still 1750 in the hole and no boat.

@socialmediamanagement1859

14 күн бұрын

​@@WillGGGi don't understand, and that's ok i'm not ruling on anything😂

The girl with the plaintiff is either mortified to be on tv.....or she's being held against her will. Anyone else notice that?

@pannamal5182

Ай бұрын

Judge didn’t care.

@yeshl2581

Ай бұрын

I wonder if that’s how the defendant was feeling?

@editorshaaan

Ай бұрын

Mail order bride

@matthewmorales94

Ай бұрын

Correct Philipana overseas bride, i have one to..

@pannamal5182

Ай бұрын

@@matthewmorales94 how do I get one?

OMG Judge!! 3400/2 = 1700 each. But defendant already paid 1500 to plaintiff, so judgement should be 200. There. Fixed it. The accounting of input costs are all equal (repairs, purchase) so the math is easy here. Or .... 3400 - 2000 = 1400 profit or 700 each. Profit _ input costs = 700 + 1000 = 1700 each. P already paid 1500=> 1700-1500= 200 judgement! There fixed it again. Yes, I'm a CPA

@Justchilling8261

Ай бұрын

I'm not an accountant but definitely knew the judge's math is wrong.

@dbabies82

Ай бұрын

Yeah, her math was all the way wrong. The plaintiff even admitted when he filed suit that he received an additional 750 on top of the 1500, so he received way more profit than he was owed, and I fully believe the defendant spent more money to fix parts up, so the defendant ended up in the negative.

@hockeygirl8401

Ай бұрын

Yep

@sharonjohnson8512

Ай бұрын

It is not a pure mathematical issue. The law impacts the factors.

@davidwarner3326

Ай бұрын

Yeah, no. It wasn't a down payment. The agreement was to SPLIT the profit. If I pay $2250 for something and sell it for $3400, my profit is $1150, and half that is $575.

This case is stupid! Plaintiff shouldn't get anything

The plaintiff is petty…just petty. He is a sad little man. I Per the agreement…plaintiff got too much IMHO

Certain things you should never do with a friend and buying a large purchase is one of those things.

She neglected to take in the fact that the Defendant had an initial invbestment of 1000 dollars. He should of gotten 75.00

@al5945

Ай бұрын

The defendant specifically said the plaintiff denies that that happened and that he had no proof on his end. What did you expect the judge to do? 🤷

She looks scared to death!!!

@Jb-mi2rm

14 күн бұрын

She is …prob in many ways

The plaintiff gives off money hungry.. sorry to say.

@RileyCullen1

Күн бұрын

Exactly

What a long boring case, the plaintiff is petty

The plaintiff gives "I'll fight you" vibes. He's girlfriend looks frightened too. I can totally understand the defendants "duress".

I just don't trust the Plaintiff. He comes off of a money grabbing liar

@RileyCullen1

Күн бұрын

ANNNNDDDD who is using the wrong words as well! ’hes libel to me’ 😣🤨😳🤯 so the plaintiff is saying that the defendant is writing all over him with lies?!?! He’s stupid.

I think the judge got this one wrong

I get irrationally irratable when listening to certain plantiffs and defendants. These guys both sound so whiny and privileged at the same time it hurts

Should have had him sign a receipt that said this supercedes all previous agreements. Simple and done.

@christinesbetterknitting4533

18 күн бұрын

The word is spelled "supersedes." Strange but true.

The winner doesn't think he's a terrible person , but everybody else does

Both of these guys are special.

The defendant said: "I've seen him by his own actions, I seen his character, and I no longer wanted him around my son." The defendant not wanting the plantiff around his six year old son tells me he discovered something new about the plantiff that he no longer trusted him. Perhaps the way he treats his wife, who knows. They both were being careful what they said about each other.

@rbrachmann

5 күн бұрын

At the end, the plaintiff said the defendant was saying/doing things at work to get him fired. That's not very careful to me. That's malicious and defaming.

defendant knew the dude he was selling it to was going to immediately turn around and sell it again for more and he would make money again. they worked it out beforehand for sure.

What is up with lady with plaintiff? Blink if you need help!

The plaintiff is using words he doesn’t understand

Both old men are a mess after all these years. Took advantage of each other over a boat.

That was longest exit interview I’ve ever seen, good grief. 😩And to those saying the girl looked distressed; she might not even speak English that well and just really doesn’t want to be there on national TV.

"Proof is what I go on, dude!" Every judge needs a shirt that says that 😆

If the plantiff was paid and 'bought out', he is owed nothing more! Zero.

Just because a man is taller doesn't mean he is a fighter .. The shorter guy looks like a tough guy with a temper !!! Sadly this was a bad idea as it ruined a friendship !!

I’ve never seen Doug at a loss for words 🤣🤣🤣. Normally he’s good with wrapping up little tantrums.

The plaintiff has a desperation in his eyes. He was willing to lose a friendship to snake a little more money out of a deal.

My Dad told me a long time ago that you don’t have friends when it comes to money. Things like this don’t work out well too often.

They ended their friendship over $576.00!

@vorpal22

Ай бұрын

It doesn't seem like the kind of friendship that is worth maintaining based on this.

@stacybstacyb

Күн бұрын

They more ended it over the plaintiff being dangerous to the defendant’s child.

Well that boat sailed😂

Sounds like EGO, ED and COKE 👩🏿‍⚖️

Once he bought him out that was a done deal.. This is crazy.

They should have sold the boat(to someone they didn't know)and split the profit, done deal. That way, there are no hard feelings, that one made more money than the other. Common sense. This whole deal seems more complicated than it needed to be. The Defendant claiming "duress" and fear for his family make me think HE DID pull something shady. They were supposed to be friends for goodness sake.

Judge is earning her pay today. 🙄

Does the plaintiffs lady know this is a court and inappropriate wardrobe?

This case was so confusing I think neither should get a dime. 🤷‍♀️🤦‍♀️

I know everyone thinks the girl looks scared but I thought Doug looked a little intimidated by the real tall guy.

It is obvious the "old man" is a complete liar. He could have just split the profit. People they work with all were a part of this whole thing. The boat was sold at the profit of 6500.00.

@dbabies82

Ай бұрын

Yeah, he for sure sold it at 6500, like the plaintiff believes. That's why the defendant was ok with the verdict and never got angry at the plaintiff winning so much. He claims the plaintiff received 1500+750, and then won over 500 in judgement, so the plaintiff made over 2800 out of a 3400. That means the defendant only received 600 from the sell, which doesn't even cover his initial investment of 750 (let alone his 450 repair cost and other 250 repair cost). He didn't get angry or even point that out, so he for sure sold it at 6500, like the plaintiff believes.

Does she not realize she is in court? That get up that she has on is for night clubs. She looks ridiculous.

@TopherGrant

Ай бұрын

I didn't even know she was there till the end! Trophy wife for sure

@mickm6309

Ай бұрын

@@TopherGrant I thought it was his daughter, but now I'm not sure.

@oldageisdumb

Ай бұрын

@@TopherGrantThey are truck drivers. They don’t have trophy wives

@jeanm9521

Ай бұрын

She's kinda standing away from him when he didn't get awarded so much. She's not happy.

@TopherGrant

Ай бұрын

@mickm6309 she never looked up. Not sure if she was nervous or scared of him

Snake move ?? Man cut his losses and got double investment with no room for liabikity foh

This was a very civilized case. They seem like decent, honest men.

I don't think the plaintiff is very bright 😮

Can’t believe this petty case of two grown men for $500

@karenwalters1211

Ай бұрын

I agree. My time is worth more than $500. I would have just cut my losses and never enter into an agreement with that guy again. That’s all

Such repetitive testimony! And shame on the judge for her statement that, due to his height, the defendant shouldn't have been intimidated by the plaintiff (not that I believe that he was). People can - and do - hurt others who are bigger. Or a smaller person could have a crackpotted personality, and be the type to burn another person's home if they're angry.

The math is wrong!!! What happened to the defendant's original $1000 put in the boat. That should have been subtracted before calculating the profit

All this math just baffles me. Ugh.

@vorpal22

Ай бұрын

What about it baffles you?

@dbabies82

Ай бұрын

@@vorpal22 hahahahaha

I watched 2 seconds and came here and seriously no comments about the plaintiff forehead? Fr? Ok

Maybe it’s me, but the plaintiff’s attitude seems a little off when answering questions or even describing the circumstances.

@annerose9219

Ай бұрын

Maybe he’s nervous?

@Leonrey-ic1wh

Ай бұрын

Classic dumb brain syndrome.

Just because someone is taller than someone, does not mean a smaller statured person can not be intimidating and threatening!! Cone on Judge that attitude is ridiculous!

You made yourself look bad by being MONEY HUNGRY PERIOD !

All that over $500

I’m confused. If they paid $1500 for it. And sold it for $3400 in my brain the most the plaintiff could get would be $200

Sorry Judge, your math on this is terrible! He sold the boat for 3400 AFTER he bought out the other guy. That would be all his profit and his right to profit.

Plaintiff is rather simple isn’t he.

Folks wear anything in this court. Judge Judy would not allow it at all

@vorpal22

Ай бұрын

What's wrong with what they're wearing? They both look fine to me.

@Sugarplum33

Ай бұрын

​@@vorpal22the club wear the lady with the plaintiff is wearing

@vorpal22

Ай бұрын

@@Sugarplum33 Ah. Ha - hard to notice her except at the beginning and then again until right at the end. I can see why someone would call that outfit inappropriate for court.

That's the shirt she decided to wear to court?!

Lose a friendship for $500

Judge M, the size of the man has nothing to do with his ability to defend himself unless he is trained in self-defense. In addition, size has not boundaries if weapons are involved not to mention threats to one's family. That argument doesn't hold water. The defendant could definitely feel duress. The plaintiff is 100% intimidating - his stance, his facial expression.

Whÿ would plaintiff get $2825, out of $3400 sale....and he gets $575!!!!!

The defendant was lucky to get away from this leech!

How the hell did the plaintiff get $576?! The math is not mathing!!!!! 3400/2=1700 He was paid 1500 At most he would get $200! How the hell did she come up with her numbers! That’s insane!

I do it often. 😂 great response to Doug.

Lost their dignity for $540.00.

How tall are you? 6'5 😂😂😂😂😂

Heyyyyy I’m right on time !!!! ❤

This plaintiff...swear to god karma is going to get him so bad

I wish I worked with them! 😂😂😂

The boat guy totally third saled it to avoid paying lol

Once again money ruined a long term relationship and for such a small amount too...

Baby-face had to get in the last, "INTERESTING" like anyone gives af

Wait..6yr old son.... He's old enough to have grandsons

He's lying on Aaron to get as much as he can. Wow.

Someone please explain this to me, bc the calculations are off to me. They spent 1000 each to buy and fix the boat. He sold it for 3400, so the profit is 1400. But he gave the man 1500+750 (2250)... so out of the 3400, the plaintiff got 2250 while the defendant got 1150. The plaintiff received 1250 in profit (2250 minus his 1000 investment), while the defendant received only 150 in profit (1150 minus1000 investment)... But I also believe he did pay the additional 450 to fix it, so he basically paid in 1450, while only receiving 1150 (meaning he's in the negative 300, before the judgement)... Or did I miss something completely? Either way, the defendants lack of anger and reaction at the end makes me believe he did in fact sell the boat for way more profit than he admitted. I bet he already had a buyer when he made the deal for 1500+750 in the contract, and knew he would make a large profit. If he lost profit or ended up in the negative, then he would have been quick to point it out, which he didn't.

Plaintiff was def a greedy/not good “friend.”

Plaintiff: Boehoe i want money😢

Plaintiff looks and sounds a bit like Michael from GTAV

The plaintiff looks like Ray Liotta (a little bit).

@S.K.Smith-Green

Ай бұрын

Rays whiney little brother

@user-cp1of4su7x

Ай бұрын

@@S.K.Smith-Green 😆

Plantiff’s wife looks scared SOS…?

Bet he has a temper 😅

@Jb-mi2rm

14 күн бұрын

I agree

@Jb-mi2rm

14 күн бұрын

Yes hot head

@Jb-mi2rm

14 күн бұрын

Dude on point

I always get a kick out of people like the plaintiff who gets his panties in a knot because HE made a deal with the defendant who then made a few bucks on the boat while he has zero issue with getting the boat originally for well under market value. In that case he had no problem with the then seller letting the boat got for less than what it should have but now has a problem with his 'friend' making a bit of money AFTER buying him out for 2x what he paid. Plaintiff wants to suck and blow at the same time. And the cherry on top is rather than being happy with the money he just made and continuing to go out with the defendant for a beer and everyone being happy he now has to tip toe around at work thinking he's going to get in trouble and risk his pension over what, a few hundred bucks? Petty. Absolutely petty.

Girl, blink if you need help 😮😮

I’m kinda confused on this verdict. How is the plaintiff entitled to even $1 if he admits he allowed the defendant to buy him out? Oan that lady with him definitely looked like something was bothering her. Then again I watch too much crime tv so maybe I’m paranoid😂

Couple of old truckers fighting over 575 bucks ,get a grip .

I agree the girl may have done it on purpose which was not right but if you put yourself in her shoes . I couldn’t imagine following which seems like such an inconvenient agreement of following strict rules that consists of what time I am allowed to access the kitchen that I’m paying rent for . All for , someone to not respect their end of the agreement . Seems a bit selfish if you ask me . I would have offered to Uber eats anything my roommate wanted if I went way past my scheduled time in the kitchen . That forced her roommate to have to eat dinner late , that’s so inconsiderate.

Boat case - dude you can read so not being an attorney is irrelevant

Size means nothing. I don't think the defendant was afraid of the plaintiff, but the judge should know size doesn't matter.

The plaintiff is nasty!!! I would get you in trouble too. You are very petty sir.

The plaintiff reminds me of a little kid who looks at cups side by side and complains because one has a hair more. Booo

A twenty year friendship in the trash over a few dollars. Sad. Odd agreement in that written document that any FUTURE profits will be split. That's what the document said. Who knows if the defendant pulled a fast one. But the plaintiff didn't have proof for court.

This "after-the-case" character adds absolutely NOTHING. Ugh.