Just because he’s tall doesn’t mean he can’t be intimidated. Her husband is tall and I don’t think he could bust a grape 😂

@sandylane5498

24 күн бұрын

Exactly!

@kiyahbeauty9929

21 күн бұрын

😅😅😅 shots FIRED 😂

@amcgee5222

10 күн бұрын

😂😂😂

The girl with the plaintiff is either mortified to be on tv.....or she's being held against her will. Anyone else notice that?

@pannamal5182

28 күн бұрын

Judge didn’t care.

@yeshl2581

28 күн бұрын

I wonder if that’s how the defendant was feeling?

@editorshaaan

28 күн бұрын

Mail order bride

@matthewmorales94

28 күн бұрын

Correct Philipana overseas bride, i have one to..

@pannamal5182

27 күн бұрын

@@matthewmorales94 how do I get one?

I can see how the old man can be intimidated by the other guy, the other guy is very greedy greedy greedy greedy

@marys4565

28 күн бұрын

I know a few people who resemble the plaintiff....all have over bearing personalities....it rattles people lol...I get what the defendant is saying. Some of us chose to disassociate...doesn't make them bad people

I think the judge got this one wrong

I hate the argument that just because you are a tall person that you aren't under duress. Just because you are big, or tall, doesn't mean you handle conflicts well and can fight. You can feel threatened and worry for your own safety and the safety of your family.

@sandylane5498

24 күн бұрын

Exactly!

@augustmoon9973

24 күн бұрын

Agreed! Some people, regardless of size, will avoid any potential conflict when they've seen behaviors escalate from that person previously. The plaintiff looks like a hot head, and I don't quite follow how he was awarded any additional monies. 🤔

@bjohnson1149

15 күн бұрын

Well said. I said something similar but not as well as you.

The plaintiffs wife looks like she was being held prisoner

@vorpal22

27 күн бұрын

That was exactly the impression that I got, too. She looks defeated and frightened. The plaintiff says that the defendant is making "zings" at him in court when he did that to the defendant multiple times.

@joannethomas8005

27 күн бұрын

Yes she look scared

@user-fz6yg7gb2r

27 күн бұрын

haha, she knows she's gonna be in trouble because he didn't get what he wanted from the case

@suzannecrum9702

23 күн бұрын

Also,he is much older than the lady with him.She must be with him for the bucks.As he us not appealing at all.

This case was like a bad day in the accounting office 😵‍💫

I absolutely hate the "friend or no friend" thing. The plaintiff destroyed a 20 year friendship for $500

@LeviAaronx

28 күн бұрын

They weren’t really friends to begin with

@editorshaaan

28 күн бұрын

The friendship was over long before that

@msfranklin2650

23 күн бұрын

DON'T BLAME THE PLAINTIFF OBVIOUSLY HE WAS OWED $$$ SO IT FALLS ON THE DEFENDANT STOP MAKING EXCUSES

Plaintiff needs to stop using words he has no idea how to use. At the end, when talking to moderator. “He proves he’s being libel to me!”

@KAKE-26

27 күн бұрын

I’d check your own imperfect use of grammar, before coming for others.

@harmonynature1418

27 күн бұрын

😬

Maybe I'm just too tired to think clearly right now but the judge's math seems wrong on this one. They both initially invested $750.00. The defendant then paid the plantif a total of $2250.00. Ignoring the repair costs, the defendant has now made a total investment of $3000.00 in the boat (his original $750.00 + $2250.00). He sold it for $3400.00 earning a profit of only $400.00. Either way you look at it, the judgement ended up with the plantif receiving a total of $2826.00 from a $3400.00 sale. That sure doesn't seem like a fair and equal profit to me.

@WillGGG

28 күн бұрын

The end result is wrong. The 2250 is the original 750 the defendant gave the plaintiff for the original boat purchase plus another 1500 when the defendant bought the boat outright from the plaintiff. So at this point the defendant is in for 2250 and the plaintiff has 750 profit. Add another 500 sale profit and the plaintiff made 1250 total and the defendant is still 1750 in the hole and no boat.

@socialmediamanagement1859

7 күн бұрын

​@@WillGGGi don't understand, and that's ok i'm not ruling on anything😂

OMG Judge!! 3400/2 = 1700 each. But defendant already paid 1500 to plaintiff, so judgement should be 200. There. Fixed it. The accounting of input costs are all equal (repairs, purchase) so the math is easy here. Or .... 3400 - 2000 = 1400 profit or 700 each. Profit _ input costs = 700 + 1000 = 1700 each. P already paid 1500=> 1700-1500= 200 judgement! There fixed it again. Yes, I'm a CPA

@Justchilling8261

28 күн бұрын

I'm not an accountant but definitely knew the judge's math is wrong.

@dbabies82

27 күн бұрын

Yeah, her math was all the way wrong. The plaintiff even admitted when he filed suit that he received an additional 750 on top of the 1500, so he received way more profit than he was owed, and I fully believe the defendant spent more money to fix parts up, so the defendant ended up in the negative.

@hockeygirl8401

27 күн бұрын

Yep

@sharonjohnson8512

26 күн бұрын

It is not a pure mathematical issue. The law impacts the factors.

@davidwarner3326

24 күн бұрын

Yeah, no. It wasn't a down payment. The agreement was to SPLIT the profit. If I pay $2250 for something and sell it for $3400, my profit is $1150, and half that is $575.

Plaintiff acts like a total control freak, what he says goes and you can forget about it,he’s a one way street and that girl looks terrified

the judge messed that ruling up.

The defendant said: "I've seen him by his own actions, I seen his character, and I no longer wanted him around my son." The defendant not wanting the plantiff around his six year old son tells me he discovered something new about the plantiff that he no longer trusted him. Perhaps the way he treats his wife, who knows. They both were being careful what they said about each other.

This case is stupid! Plaintiff shouldn't get anything

She looks scared to death!!!

@Jb-mi2rm

7 күн бұрын

She is …prob in many ways

The plaintiff is petty…just petty. He is a sad little man. I Per the agreement…plaintiff got too much IMHO

The plaintiff gives off money hungry.. sorry to say.

Certain things you should never do with a friend and buying a large purchase is one of those things.

The plaintiff gives "I'll fight you" vibes. He's girlfriend looks frightened too. I can totally understand the defendants "duress".

She neglected to take in the fact that the Defendant had an initial invbestment of 1000 dollars. He should of gotten 75.00

@al5945

23 күн бұрын

The defendant specifically said the plaintiff denies that that happened and that he had no proof on his end. What did you expect the judge to do? 🤷

What a long boring case, the plaintiff is petty

I just don't trust the Plaintiff. He comes off of a money grabbing liar

The winner doesn't think he's a terrible person , but everybody else does

Should have had him sign a receipt that said this supercedes all previous agreements. Simple and done.

@christinesbetterknitting4533

11 күн бұрын

The word is spelled "supersedes." Strange but true.

Both of these guys are special.

"Proof is what I go on, dude!" Every judge needs a shirt that says that 😆

I get irrationally irratable when listening to certain plantiffs and defendants. These guys both sound so whiny and privileged at the same time it hurts

defendant knew the dude he was selling it to was going to immediately turn around and sell it again for more and he would make money again. they worked it out beforehand for sure.

The plaintiff is using words he doesn’t understand

They ended their friendship over $576.00!

@vorpal22

27 күн бұрын

It doesn't seem like the kind of friendship that is worth maintaining based on this.

That was longest exit interview I’ve ever seen, good grief. 😩And to those saying the girl looked distressed; she might not even speak English that well and just really doesn’t want to be there on national TV.

Both old men are a mess after all these years. Took advantage of each other over a boat.

What is up with lady with plaintiff? Blink if you need help!

Well that boat sailed😂

Just because a man is taller doesn't mean he is a fighter .. The shorter guy looks like a tough guy with a temper !!! Sadly this was a bad idea as it ruined a friendship !!

If the plantiff was paid and 'bought out', he is owed nothing more! Zero.

I’ve never seen Doug at a loss for words 🤣🤣🤣. Normally he’s good with wrapping up little tantrums.

My Dad told me a long time ago that you don’t have friends when it comes to money. Things like this don’t work out well too often.

Sounds like EGO, ED and COKE 👩🏿‍⚖️

The plaintiff has a desperation in his eyes. He was willing to lose a friendship to snake a little more money out of a deal.

Judge is earning her pay today. 🙄

They should have sold the boat(to someone they didn't know)and split the profit, done deal. That way, there are no hard feelings, that one made more money than the other. Common sense. This whole deal seems more complicated than it needed to be. The Defendant claiming "duress" and fear for his family make me think HE DID pull something shady. They were supposed to be friends for goodness sake.

Does the plaintiffs lady know this is a court and inappropriate wardrobe?

This was a very civilized case. They seem like decent, honest men.

It is obvious the "old man" is a complete liar. He could have just split the profit. People they work with all were a part of this whole thing. The boat was sold at the profit of 6500.00.

@dbabies82

24 күн бұрын

Yeah, he for sure sold it at 6500, like the plaintiff believes. That's why the defendant was ok with the verdict and never got angry at the plaintiff winning so much. He claims the plaintiff received 1500+750, and then won over 500 in judgement, so the plaintiff made over 2800 out of a 3400. That means the defendant only received 600 from the sell, which doesn't even cover his initial investment of 750 (let alone his 450 repair cost and other 250 repair cost). He didn't get angry or even point that out, so he for sure sold it at 6500, like the plaintiff believes.

I know everyone thinks the girl looks scared but I thought Doug looked a little intimidated by the real tall guy.

Plaintiff: Boehoe i want money😢

Can’t believe this petty case of two grown men for $500

@karenwalters1211

24 күн бұрын

I agree. My time is worth more than $500. I would have just cut my losses and never enter into an agreement with that guy again. That’s all

Once he bought him out that was a done deal.. This is crazy.

The math is wrong!!! What happened to the defendant's original $1000 put in the boat. That should have been subtracted before calculating the profit

All that over $500

All this math just baffles me. Ugh.

@vorpal22

27 күн бұрын

What about it baffles you?

@dbabies82

26 күн бұрын

@@vorpal22 hahahahaha

Just because someone is taller than someone, does not mean a smaller statured person can not be intimidating and threatening!! Cone on Judge that attitude is ridiculous!

This case was so confusing I think neither should get a dime. 🤷‍♀️🤦‍♀️

The boat guy totally third saled it to avoid paying lol

The defendant was lucky to get away from this leech!

Judge M, the size of the man has nothing to do with his ability to defend himself unless he is trained in self-defense. In addition, size has not boundaries if weapons are involved not to mention threats to one's family. That argument doesn't hold water. The defendant could definitely feel duress. The plaintiff is 100% intimidating - his stance, his facial expression.

I wish I worked with them! 😂😂😂

Someone please explain this to me, bc the calculations are off to me. They spent 1000 each to buy and fix the boat. He sold it for 3400, so the profit is 1400. But he gave the man 1500+750 (2250)... so out of the 3400, the plaintiff got 2250 while the defendant got 1150. The plaintiff received 1250 in profit (2250 minus his 1000 investment), while the defendant received only 150 in profit (1150 minus1000 investment)... But I also believe he did pay the additional 450 to fix it, so he basically paid in 1450, while only receiving 1150 (meaning he's in the negative 300, before the judgement)... Or did I miss something completely? Either way, the defendants lack of anger and reaction at the end makes me believe he did in fact sell the boat for way more profit than he admitted. I bet he already had a buyer when he made the deal for 1500+750 in the contract, and knew he would make a large profit. If he lost profit or ended up in the negative, then he would have been quick to point it out, which he didn't.

Sorry Judge, your math on this is terrible! He sold the boat for 3400 AFTER he bought out the other guy. That would be all his profit and his right to profit.

Snake move ?? Man cut his losses and got double investment with no room for liabikity foh

Lose a friendship for $500

Maybe it’s me, but the plaintiff’s attitude seems a little off when answering questions or even describing the circumstances.

@annerose9219

28 күн бұрын

Maybe he’s nervous?

@Leonrey-ic1wh

28 күн бұрын

Classic dumb brain syndrome.

I watched 2 seconds and came here and seriously no comments about the plaintiff forehead? Fr? Ok

How the hell did the plaintiff get $576?! The math is not mathing!!!!! 3400/2=1700 He was paid 1500 At most he would get $200! How the hell did she come up with her numbers! That’s insane!

Folks wear anything in this court. Judge Judy would not allow it at all

@vorpal22

27 күн бұрын

What's wrong with what they're wearing? They both look fine to me.

@Sugarplum33

27 күн бұрын

​@@vorpal22the club wear the lady with the plaintiff is wearing

@vorpal22

27 күн бұрын

@@Sugarplum33 Ah. Ha - hard to notice her except at the beginning and then again until right at the end. I can see why someone would call that outfit inappropriate for court.

Once again money ruined a long term relationship and for such a small amount too...

I don't think the plaintiff is very bright 😮

Such repetitive testimony! And shame on the judge for her statement that, due to his height, the defendant shouldn't have been intimidated by the plaintiff (not that I believe that he was). People can - and do - hurt others who are bigger. Or a smaller person could have a crackpotted personality, and be the type to burn another person's home if they're angry.

You made yourself look bad by being MONEY HUNGRY PERIOD !

This plaintiff...swear to god karma is going to get him so bad

Whÿ would plaintiff get $2825, out of $3400 sale....and he gets $575!!!!!

Heyyyyy I’m right on time !!!! ❤

How tall are you? 6'5 😂😂😂😂😂

A twenty year friendship in the trash over a few dollars. Sad. Odd agreement in that written document that any FUTURE profits will be split. That's what the document said. Who knows if the defendant pulled a fast one. But the plaintiff didn't have proof for court.

The plaintiff looks like Ray Liotta (a little bit).

@S.K.Smith-Green

27 күн бұрын

Rays whiney little brother

@user-cp1of4su7x

27 күн бұрын

@@S.K.Smith-Green 😆

I do it often. 😂 great response to Doug.

Plaintiff looks and sounds a bit like Michael from GTAV

Bet he has a temper 😅

@Jb-mi2rm

7 күн бұрын

I agree

@Jb-mi2rm

7 күн бұрын

Yes hot head

@Jb-mi2rm

7 күн бұрын

Dude on point

He's lying on Aaron to get as much as he can. Wow.

Lost their dignity for $540.00.

That's the shirt she decided to wear to court?!

I’m kinda confused on this verdict. How is the plaintiff entitled to even $1 if he admits he allowed the defendant to buy him out? Oan that lady with him definitely looked like something was bothering her. Then again I watch too much crime tv so maybe I’m paranoid😂

Does she not realize she is in court? That get up that she has on is for night clubs. She looks ridiculous.

@TopherGrant

28 күн бұрын

I didn't even know she was there till the end! Trophy wife for sure

@mickm6309

28 күн бұрын

@@TopherGrant I thought it was his daughter, but now I'm not sure.

@oldageisdumb

28 күн бұрын

@@TopherGrantThey are truck drivers. They don’t have trophy wives

@jeanm9521

28 күн бұрын

She's kinda standing away from him when he didn't get awarded so much. She's not happy.

@TopherGrant

28 күн бұрын

@mickm6309 she never looked up. Not sure if she was nervous or scared of him

Plantiff’s wife looks scared SOS…?

Plaintiff was def a greedy/not good “friend.”

Baby-face had to get in the last, "INTERESTING" like anyone gives af

The plaintiff reminds me of a little kid who looks at cups side by side and complains because one has a hair more. Booo

Couple of old truckers fighting over 575 bucks ,get a grip .

The plaintiff is nasty!!! I would get you in trouble too. You are very petty sir.

Boat case - dude you can read so not being an attorney is irrelevant

Plaintiff comes off a dhead

This "after-the-case" character adds absolutely NOTHING. Ugh.

Size means nothing. I don't think the defendant was afraid of the plaintiff, but the judge should know size doesn't matter.

Imo the “under duress” excuse is the lamest and weakest and it shows a lot of the person character.

They're both a little dim

Why didn't Judge call Chris?

1000 each in costs to bu it so he paid plaintiff 500 extra so he is out 2500 so far the boat sold for 3400 so he made a profit of 800 so half is 400. If that document of 2250 is correct then the defendant paid 3250, and profited 150 half is 75.

The plaintiff is horrible