Very interesting, great video!

@weiwenleung

2 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it!

.... and looked where and how Malaysia and Singapore are today in 2023. Results speak itself!

@ismailwan8413

11 ай бұрын

Compare apple wth apple. Spore has no rubber tapper, fisherman, farmers, etc. Natural watetfalls. Still wish to compare?

@picopiku

11 ай бұрын

@@ismailwan8413 You slapping your own face is it? Its like saying Singapore is disadvantaged yet it managed to punch so much above its weight as compared to Malaysia.

@hydoffdhagaweyne1037

10 ай бұрын

@@picopiku well, genetics matter man

@zulamy3472

26 күн бұрын

Why are you sounding so proud of yourself when it's the result of unique advantages gained by western colonialism at the expense of indigenous malays

Umno had an arm in sg, party is called PKMS (UMNO's Malay acronym is PKMB) and PKMS still exists! Albeit as part of SDA. So in a way PKMS and DAP are similar in each other's countries but diff fate. PKMS is largely irrelevant and DAP a component party of the Anwar government. Nice comment about that the butterfly event

Great history lesson that is obscure. Thank you

Nice! Didn't know this story. Aussie tourist here touring SG and MY and trying to piece together the historical facts....

In 1964, PAP took part in the Malaysia Election and won one seat of Bungsar with the same logo of 'a circle and a dangerous lightning' for it does not strike at the same point twice. Today, we have 'a killer lightning' even under the shelter of an umbrella.

bro u can also claim Maybank is Singaporean bank since it started there

@woonjacktan8671

Жыл бұрын

can also claim national university of Singapore which previously is another branch from university Malaya

Well done❤.

The political rehearsal took place when 'Bobby & Harry' were in London. This is a British mastermind of not granting Singapore Independence but 'Bobby' of Malaysia would do so. After all, Singapore is part of The Federation of Malaya as witnessed by FMSR at Tanjong Pagar and Johore Royal ancestry is in Singapore, too. Seeing is believing of what the true historical nature of Singapore. May peace come upon you...once and for all.

Oh no wonder Penang is so similar to Singapore

@weiwenleung

2 жыл бұрын

LOL!

@natep6729

Жыл бұрын

How is it similar to Singapore? Other than it being an island?

@zhen86

Жыл бұрын

@@natep6729 ruled by British before

@HKspurs10

Жыл бұрын

​@@natep6729 the architecture, rule of governance are similar

@vtntanvt4389

Жыл бұрын

Some road names are the same

On hindsight, if Umno had followed Dato Onn Jaafar proposal in 1951 to allow members of all races, then many non-Malays will NOT get their citizenships in the first place. When Umno remain a Malay party, it had no choice but to coalition with non-Malay parties and share their seats with MCA (Chinese) and MIC (Indians) which resulted Tunku giving in to his coalition partners request to give non-documented migrants from China and India access to citizenships in 1957 after the Alliance won together.

@jwanglerz8500

7 ай бұрын

Ooo.. then is it correct to say Tunku never welcome pendatang from China and India in the first place before the war?

@jameslim3850

7 ай бұрын

Tunku was so kind hearted to give other non-native with no documents citizenships which no other country does that for Chinese or Indians. Others will just force assimilate all the Chinese like in Thailand or Philippines. Only Malaysia has the highest Chinese minority at 22.5% when before independence their citizenships was just less than 8%. It is much more easier and less tensions when there is a large majority race in the country e.g 80-90% than a multiracial country with a sizeable minority group. Because of Tunku allows Chinese and Indians with no documents to get citizenships out of his kind heart thru Umno partnerships with MCA and MIC back in the 1950s, thats how these overseas minorities get all their privileges' in Malaysia and later went on to other countries. If Tunku did not allow it, then even Singapore won't have that many Chinese too as the British also never give them citizenship back then@@jwanglerz8500

@xzdrtxyzxvn

3 ай бұрын

​@@jameslim3850don't spew Rubbish here...MCA and Mic sold our birthrights when they did not defend the interest of the people. Why call for merdeka?? Ita for their Greed. The British were kind to all races.. Look back then there is prominent Indian leaders and Professionals..The Malays are migrants too and they lose the country for more than 200 years under British rule.. Now they try to change history lesson by telling cock and bull story of their greatness. Actually they don't have a history as they are migrants from Micronesia.

@xzdrtxyzxvn

3 ай бұрын

​@@jameslim3850Don't talk as if the non Malays have to be grateful to the Malays for granting citizenship. Our citizenship comes from Queen Elizabeth. No citizenship No Merdeka. Further Malays are migrants too. Orang Asli also migrants from Papua New Guinea. Everbody is migrants too. Ketuanan is Farce hated by God as God created everybody equal.

@jameslim3850

3 ай бұрын

@@xzdrtxyzxvn Facts are facts. Its in the Constitution. People like you who refuse to acknowledge history and accept what really happen. Wars and racial tensions are caused by people who refuse to respect a contract and agreement.

Wait a minute, if you talk in the construction like that, you need to know that almost of Malay and Bumiputera ethnopolitics in Malaysia (UMNO, etc) & Singapore (SIMNO, Malay factions in PAP, etc) have their roots from Indonesian politics too.

Didnt know that pap contested in 1964 Malaysia GE n Pap Devan Nair won a seat

1965 Oct - The People’s Action Party of Malaysia is renamed to Democratic Action Party. 1976 May 17th - In a letter to the Socialist International,the Democratic Action Party’s CEC member MP Fan Yew Teng wrote:” I was a member of the PAP (membership No.03211 issued by Mr Lee Kuan Yew himself on February 9 , 1965) when Singapore was part of Malaysia. I had then joined the PAP in good faith, thinking that it really stood for democratic socialism. I must admit that I was proved wrong. I am thoroughly disillusioned with the PAP’s record as a ‘democratic socialist’ party and government. And, as my party’s official organ, “The Rocket”, and other records show, I had in recent years come out in open criticism of the PAP, especially at University forums both in Malaysia and abroad. I have come to the strong conclusion that the PAP is a highly oppressive regime.”

@user-bp5qz5jd3f

11 ай бұрын

But no one can deny that Singapore is very successful.

@mrtienphysics666

11 ай бұрын

@@user-bp5qz5jd3f Indeed. Successful in being not democratic and not socialist.

@xcjsmith5310

10 ай бұрын

@@user-bp5qz5jd3f that is true, it is because the leadership have a great attitude towards building a nation and dont accept corruption, one of the interview, Lee Kuan Yew mentioned that a CIA try to bribe Lee to subvert Singapore intelligence but the government officer and Lee rejected the offer but counter offer that there will be no bribe but funding to Singapore development, that shows that he did it for the country not for himself, If it was Malaysia leader, they immediately accept bribes. Singapore is a rare case and grateful to have him as a leader

@user-vh3fr3lb8w

4 ай бұрын

​@@mrtienphysics666we need economic prosperity not stupid socialism and democracy. People don't eat socialism.

@mrtienphysics666

4 ай бұрын

@@user-vh3fr3lb8w Without socialism , society will be very unequal, and if you are unlucky, you are the one not to eat anything even if the society is "prosperous", then you will know how stupid it is.

And not to mention that Mr. Lee is the one that led China to be an open country and be the second largest economic rn

@simonsimon2888

10 ай бұрын

Yes! Deng came to Singapore in 1979 with the 'over-flooding' of PRC into Singapore .." Speak Mandarin Campaign" Hence, a child borned of PRC parents in Singapore is 44 years old today. Cinapore? Habis!

Reading LIVING IN A TIME OF DECEPTION

WONDERFUL PROCESS OF FREEDOM IN SINGAPORE. MANIPUR WANTS TO FOLLOW THE FOOTSTEPS OF SINGAPORE WHY, WHEN, WHERE, WHO AND HOW SINGAPORE BECAME A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY WITHOUT BLOODSHED BY SEPARATION FROM MALAYSIA?

@weiwenleung

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

@zulamy3472

26 күн бұрын

Just steal a successful malay port and make it multiculturally chinese

1 SGD → RM.5.80 🤲😃

Your 1960 population figure of Malaya and Singapore is completely wrong. It's not correct.

@normantan7796

3 күн бұрын

Maybe he is talking about voting population?

The "scale fell of my eyes" for Devan Nair. Too late. He chose to die in Canada.

Tengku's offer "anyone not happy especially the Chinese here, surrender your passport get a free air ticket(one way) and fly yourself to anywhere you like..remains 'open date till today!' Any taker?

Singapore decides Malaysia's election.....Yeah! Right! Correct! Exactly! Very Funny! 🤣😅😂😁😆

@weiwenleung

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

@hyy3657

Ай бұрын

It should be called "Singapore's multiculturism and modernization legacy that keeps racism at bay in Malaysia"

Abang, Adek

Malaysia election nothing to do with singapore....

@derekyong8878

Ай бұрын

Did you even watch the video?

That would be the PAP sponsored view. You don't even mention the riots in 1969. Yes Singapore changed Malaysia forever but not for the better. What Lee was doing was actually to secure his own political fortunes in Chinese-majority Singapore. "Malaysian Malaysia" was not a genuine political vision for Malaysia that he wanted to make work. He was really using the rest of Malaysia as his pawn or bargaining chip with the UMNO led alliance to get what he wanted in Singapore. He talks in his memoirs of pulling off a bloodless coup when the separation was sealed. His real adversary wasn't UMNO but the MCA. The PAP lost badly in the elections contesting against the MCA in Malaysia. Singapore's financial disputes were also with the MCA Finance Minister. Only after losing the elections did he change course to take aim at UMNO directly. Basically he was signaling that if UMNO wanted to try to topple him in his base in Singapore, he too will use the race card by rallying the non-Malays in Malaysia, especially the Chinese. The problem was never that he had a realistic chance of taking over Malaysia and replacing the Alliance. Neither the right nor the left in Malaysia was with him, and of course he had no appeal with the Islamist either. Just look at who else was with him in the Malaysian Solidarity Convention. What he could do was cause endless trouble and instability with race-baiting of the non-Malays, cloaked in the language of Malaysian Malaysia. It was typical irresponsible opposition tactics. He was doing it knowing full well that his base was the Singaporean Chinese and this language of anti Malay-special-rights when cast in the appropriate light would be popular. The PAP has assiduously maintained Singapore's dominant Chinese majority after independence with all kinds of policies in immigration, housing and the electoral system whereas all the other Malaysian cities on the West coast which used to have Chinese majorities like Singapore now have much more balanced racial demographics with natural population growth and urbanisation. That is the indispensable context of Singapore's 'racial equality'. It is Lee's actions culminating in the separation agreement (which was carefully negotiated and not "forced upon" Singapore) that cemented the divide between a Chinese-Singapore and Malay-Malaysia and here you are hailing his idealistic vision of equality! The DAP is in power today precisely because it is perceived to adequately represent Chinese and non-Malay interests. They continue to be unable to gain Malay mass support, which is left to their allies. The Malays in Singapore on the other hand have no real choice at all being completely outnumbered everywhere thanks to the PAP.

@b0502127

11 ай бұрын

reasonable thoughts

@jwanglerz8500

7 ай бұрын

Sure or not bro.. now 1SGD=3RM leh.. i see many Malaysian Malay come to Singapore work daily.... Also, the Malay in Singapore have special privilege on education, they can get subsidy for education from primary up to local university free of charge.. only for Malay, other races dont have this privilege. But i believe deep down, majority of the malays in Singapore wants to be like Malays in Malaysia to enjoy "bumiputra rights".. which is they believe the whole Malaya is belong to Malays and non malays are pendatang.... Thats why at one point LKY was warry if malays are allowed to join the army and if war to broke out between Malaysia and SG, their loyalty to which side is in questions

@talkingkangaroo4934

6 ай бұрын

​@@jwanglerz8500You haven't contradicted anything I said. The point about Malay constitutional privileges in Singapore. You do realise that LKY was using precisely that issue to hit at the Malaysian ruling coalition, causing bloody riots, until it forced separation. Then once independent, he keeps those very same privileges in the Singapore constitution. So much for political idealism. The racialised views you are expressing is precisely the outcome of his political shenanigans. Chinese Singapore and Malay Malaysia. Plain tribalism. Not a whiff of any belief in and commitment to noble ideals, the propaganda notwithstanding. And you are very proud of it. It is not surprising at all that after 60 years the Malays still lag behind in Singapore.

@jwanglerz8500

6 ай бұрын

Btw.. you sounds like you opposed Singapore ways and everyone one is given equal rights.. you said LKY is wrong and should maintain Malays with special rights? Your thoughts are no different than the whites have special rights just because they are born white. Judging your explanation, you seems believe someone should be given special treatment just because their skin color is different. I hope you are not a Singaporean and should be a Malaysian, Indonesian or other nationality that have such discriminate treatment

@jwanglerz8500

6 ай бұрын

@@talkingkangaroo4934 your first statement, "LKY is using that issue to hit at Malaysian ruling coalition" are you saying LKY is wrong and you asking the Chinese and other races to accept it and should be treated differently? If you agree, then you should be treated differently.. send RM100 to me now

@Weiwen Leung I will subscribe if you promise to never repeat the phrase "smash the like button and subscribe" or anything to this effect... super tacky.

@weiwenleung

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for your feedback!

No, Singapore did not change Malaya but it is correct that Malaysia changed itself in 1969.

The video title is designed to be eye-catching or even provocative, probably to entice people to watch it. However, I disagree with the fundamental point of Singapore "deciding" Malaysia's elections, because it exaggerates Singapore's influence and is thus misleading. Racial equality is not a PAP invention or patent. It's an inherent, general and universal desire of all peoples from all societies to be equally and fairly treated as others. Of course, there're exceptions. Racial equality is a desire that predates the PAP, which was only founded in 1954. When our forebears were part of Malaya, they saw how Western assumptions about the superiority of the "white" colonial masters was shattered by the Imperial Japanese armed forces during WWII, that conquered and imprisoned Caucasion troops, and forced them to work. So after WWII, our forebears didn't want any more foreign domination or be treated as inferior. It's just that racial equality found political expression during PAP's election campaigns and LKY's parliamentary speeches when Singapore was part of the Federation of Malaysia. PAP might have inspired DAP to do the same, as an unintended legacy. It's been 57 years since Singapore and Malaysia parted ways. DAP will find racial equality an unsustainable and lost cause if none of the Malaysian electorate believes in or aspires to equality for all races. As a small, sovereign nation-state that is vulnerable to external developments, Singapore understandably monitors developments beyond its shores that may affect its national interests. But it clearly doesn't decide Malaysia's elections. Neither can it or should it. It is the Rakyat; the Malaysian electorate, who from election to election, who collectively decide who they want to be represented in their parliament. In so doing, the citizens of Malaysia are the ones who ultimately decide their nation's future.

@weiwenleung

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your thoughts: very detailed! I completely agree that the Malaysian electorate collectively decide who they want in their parliament. I also agree that racial equality is not a PAP invention or patent. If I said otherwise elsewhere, I was wrong. At 0:30, I explained that Singapore's influence was not due to active campaigning, but due to events that occurred a long time ago. The rest of the video pinpoints the meaning of "decide".

@Scambuster491

2 жыл бұрын

U miss the meaning of the video.

@danielpang9358

11 ай бұрын

Nah UMNO wanted LKY out of Malaysia so badly, that rumours stated that his life was in danger in Malaysia.

@hyy3657

Ай бұрын

@@Scambuster491 The Title should be Singapore's multiculturism and modernization legacy that keeps racism at bay in Malaysia lol....let's hope this city-state retains its position as a pioneer vision and is prosperous as a paragon to benefit all people in the peninsula!

Singapore forever obsessed with Malaysia low key weird

😂😂😅 biar betul. ?? Lain party so bagaimana pulak?

how big is the ccp influence in sigapore?

@jasonphang3596

2 жыл бұрын

Does China interfere in the elections in Malaysia,Indonesia,or Thailand?

@traitretrudeau2367

2 жыл бұрын

@@jasonphang3596 no idea

@christiansee2500

2 жыл бұрын

0

@jasonphang3596

2 жыл бұрын

@@christiansee2500 What does "0" mean? 0 means you do not know? Or China does not interfere in the elections in Malaysia,Indonesia or Thailand? Do you have any official investigation reports put out for public knowledge or your mere assumption?

@cocaineminor4420

Жыл бұрын

They have no influence on us Singaporeans I can tell you that

Why they always talking about malaysia....we are difrent country..do it yr way....

Malaysia boleh lah 👍

Pardon my asking. Why did you not mention in your video that the British in 1959 granted Singapore, independence. And for the historical record which many and few knew, Singapore merger into Malaysia was by way of a REFERENDUM. Meaning, independence SINGAPORE, SINGAPOREAN voted with an overwhelming majority over 97% for it. Kindly please be straightforward, upright, true and historically factual about it. Thank you.

Singapore is malaysia's gaza strip. But unlike gaza, which is a concentration camp, singapore was given full independence and succeeded. Israel should learn from umno. 8% of seats vacated by singapore in malaysias parliament should have gone to sabah and sarawak. Instead. It all ended up in peninsula rural constituency giving too much sway and hindering progress.

@hyy3657

Ай бұрын

sabah and sarawak like the west bank maybe??

@syedputra5955

Ай бұрын

@@hyy3657 not as brutal. West Bank does not have a say on who gets to settle in it.

serving party

hahahaha what a joke we don't get influcend by that tiny kiasu chinese island 😂. only chinese did. besides DAP founder chen han min is Ex malaya communist member and not malaysian. japanese coloniese here only bad for chinese but for bumiputra all good and treated nicely

@weiwenleung

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your thoughts, C J!

@cj-fx2kj

2 жыл бұрын

@@weiwenleung The attitude of chinese can't be tolerate. That's why all south east asian nation always have problems with ur ppl. Look what happened to ur cousin in indo and thai. But at least chinese in indo assimilate with local and respect constitution and national language there. Unlike chinese here in malaysia and sgpore who always rasis. Maybe we too soft to yall that's pendatang like yall can act so tough right 😂. Even korean and japanese hate ur ppl 😂.

@cj-fx2kj

2 жыл бұрын

@@weiwenleung chinese same with indian can go back to their motherland. South east asian is for indigenous of this nation only not yall

@amazinggrace4933

2 жыл бұрын

We are not interested to influence this corrupted country. Please don't put us into this shit.

@ultimaxed8239

2 жыл бұрын

Cuz Pukipootra all no balls without British support lolol, can't believe Singapore hanged the smartest Malaysian😂🇲🇾🤏

Lee Kuan Yew shuold realised that Malaya belong to the Malays.The Chinese & the Indians should be thankful to the Malays who welcome them to stay in Malaya as Malayan citizen.They are given the right to vote & stand as mp.Orang campak bunga jangan kita balad tahi such as mempertikai hak isyemewa orang Melayu.

@user-oh6wb5rj2q

11 ай бұрын

Now is globalisation. Economy. Insisting with such mindset will only cause brain drain

@user-oh6wb5rj2q

11 ай бұрын

So do you truly love your country? Then why these beliefs?

@user-oh6wb5rj2q

11 ай бұрын

Plot: You go to your most favourite country(E.g. Korea) and you got ostracised because of your race. Would you want that? Some more, it’s your OWN COUNTRY. Time have change my dear that’s a bigot mindset

@byteme9718

9 ай бұрын

Welcomed? When and by who? Certainly not by racist Malays! The very same Malays that destroyed all potential Malaya had at independence. You've destroyed your own future because of your blind hatred and obsession with your silly religion.

@hyy3657

Ай бұрын

Indonesia: don't you come back to your home???

PAP as it is today is very different from DAP as the barisan sosialis element which was exiled in PAP still continue to exist in DAP. Like it or not PAP is a right leaning party while DAP is left leaning. DAP talk a good games of equality and whatnot but it is a Chinese nationalist party at heart fighting for Chinese supremacist, it's act no difference to those tunsian France muslim who seek to change France in their image, to turn France into a Muslim countries with Muslim law, Arabic signboard & Arabic school. And that exactly how DAP behaved. Asif today Chinese national type school still exists in Malaysia while not in Singapore. The Malaysian Chinese particularly who goes to SJKC was indoctrinated into ethnocentrism & racist supremacist which is probably a good culture to create unity in CHINA doesn't work in multiculturalism environment is what other dislike about them. Singapore meanwhile is a banana republic who embrace peranakan ism

@fabianlee9611

Жыл бұрын

You call Singapore a banana Republic? Then your country is what??

@picopiku

11 ай бұрын

@@fabianlee9611 Big Banana Republic.

Separation of singapore from malaysia was influence by late dictator marcos; singapore were chinese