You're the best Mark, have been waiting for a review of these 2 side by side. Thank you thank you thank you.

Needed to see this. Great review. - Thank you!

Thank you. I ended up with the Sigma 10-18mm. Own quite a few Sigma APS-C and full frame and no Tamron’s lenses and I liked the Sigma pairing with the 18-50/2.8 with their really small size on my A6700. Also own the Sigma 30/1.4 and 56/1.4 primes for this kit and the Sony 15/1.4 G. Im very happy with the purchase for sure. Enjoy your reviews. Take care.

Thanks for the awesome review. I was considering both lenses along with the Tokina 10-18mm ATX f2.8 which was on sale for $399. I have a Sony A6700 with the Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 and the little Sigma 10-18mm was the perfect complement for my compact kit. In the end the compact size and the minimum focus distance of the Sigma was what won me over the Tamron and the Tokina. I initially bought a Sony 11mm f1.8 but I found that it was too wide for a street lens. In the end the 10-18mm zoom suited my purposes better as a walk around lens and as you pointed out can also be used indoors as a studio lens. This kit fits in a 3L Peak Design Bag and I find that I take it out most of the time instead of my full frame kit. My friends are surprised that this APSC kit is lighter and more compact than even their Micro Four Thirds Kit.

@Kotokasmil

4 ай бұрын

What the best feel you perfect ? , sigma 18 50 or sigma 10 18 sir ?

You do such an amazing job with these comparisons. You’re my go-to guy for all things cameras. Thanks for all you do.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

thanks for saying that!!

@Sebartus

8 ай бұрын

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis could you do Sigma 56mm F1.4 vs Viltrox 75mm F1.2 on A6700

@Benjomatic

8 ай бұрын

@@Sebartus Please don't. I don't want to have to buy the Viltrox too :(

wow 😍the video I've been waiting for

Thank you for your honesty. Many reviewers seem paid these days and avoid saying negative things about products. I hope you stay the way you are.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

7 ай бұрын

If they are paid they should legally disclose it - not saying all do - but it's the law. There's lots of great gear and companies understand that their products aren't perfect. My goal is to try and explain the gear so people know what they're getting and what to choose

i originally wanted the tamron, then was leaning towards the sigma when it came out, but i stumbled across a deal i couldn't pass up on the tamron and couldn't be happier with it. I haven't felt the need for the extra mm on the wide end, but the extra reach, at least for me as a travel/ everyday lens, on the zoom end has definitely come in handy. I'm sure the sigma being sigma is a great lens, but the tamron has been great to me! I appreciate all the advice and insights on the two side by side and the original reviews. Camera crisis is my first stop when I'm considering new gear. Thanks as always Mark.

Thanks so much for comparing these two lenses. I think you are one of the first doing this even though it's so obvious to compare these two lenses. I own already the Tamron 18-300mm for APSC as an over all travelling lens but thinking of a wide angle zoom to complete the set (not talking about some primes as Zeiss Touit 32, Zeiss Batis 25 and a Samyang 12). Thank you for helping me in deciding.

Splendid review. TXL! Sigma 10-18 F2.8 is in my favor. I bought it yesterday for my Sony ZV-E 10. Best wishes from Switzerland. Christian

An objective video about these lenses. As always, with a dose of humor. Thanks for your information tips. Best regards from Austria.

Thanks for the nice comparison. It would be far nicer if the sharpness tests were done at landscape scene rather than macro, because that's what these lenses are for, and more importantly, sharpness widely differs on focusing distances in general.

@brunooliv3ira63

7 ай бұрын

And also compare sharpness with smaller apertures

Congratulation for 50k subs Mark!! Love your content...

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

🎉

I watched the video until the end and immediately subscribed. It's such a good review; I'll check on your channel before making any purchase decisions!! Thank you!

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

3 ай бұрын

Thanks!!

How did I know before searching that you were gonna be the one with a video comparing these two? Lol great job Mark

What a time we live in, a few years ago I owned a Fuji and I was locked in buying expensive Fuji lenses. Sigma and Tamron and others changed the game.

The Tamron was the first lens I bought when I purchased my ZV-e10 and it's been absolutely fantastic. I can't recommend it enough.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

it’s so good

Those are tempting but I already have the 10-20 Sony PZ zoom. It is mated my little ZV-E10. Great lens, very sharp so I really don't need either. Plus I have the 11mm 1.8 so I'm covered. Good review. One thing about Sigma is that is zooms backwards from Sony and Tamron.

Great job on the video Mark! Thanks for making it. Factually, I know that I need to add a telephoto to my kit. That doesn't seem to stop me from buying nothing but wide angles though. Funny, that.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

😂me too

Another great video as always. I'm a Sigma man so I would definitely get my hands this one :) Thank you for the video review.

Thank you for this review ! I was about to buy the Tamron when Sigma released this one. I rented the tamron for a Real Estate shooting with my Sony A6300, love it !! I'll check to rent the Sigma one, Sigma lenses are so nice 🤩

Great video! thank You!

The Ulanzi sounds surprisingly better, especially at the low end frequency. Of course the distance range is lower as is the bitrate, but shouldn't really make that much of a difference if you're going on KZread . I guess the build quality is what matters. I wonder how the Ulanzi would handle a drop, or general usage over time. Still, it's cost effective enough to easily replace. Great review!

Would be cool if you compare the 11mm 1.8 & the Sigma 10-18 2.8

Could you compare the Sigma 18-50 vs Sigma 28-70 FF? I know, kinda strange comparisons, maybe theres enough interest. Reason asking is, that I was pleasingly surprised when I saw pictures from the FF Sigma but not from the little one. Wondering if that had more to do with my cam in that case. (A6000 vs a7c). If its similar, I'll probably just go grab the a6700 then

I am so happy that we have such choice.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

it’s crazy, right??

@Max-Green

8 ай бұрын

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Yea!!! But good old 10-18 F4 OSS is extremely useful too.

I have the tamron and it is better for my use case (backcountry camping videos). The Tamron is weather sealed throughout where as the sigma dc dn's are only sealed at the mount. I do love the images from my sigma 16mm though, so i am extra careful with it in the wild when it rains.

🙌🏽🙌🏽great vid as always. What if we throw a tokina 11-18 2.8 in the mix😬.

I use the Sigma on 40MP Fuji, it ist a geat lens. Thank you for the review!

Great lens comparison. I have to say I was also impressed with the Ulanzi wireless mic recording in your outdoor shot. Did you treat the Ulazni recording in post? Or was it straight out of camera? Either way, for $99 USD, the Ulanzi is pretty good,

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

Straight outta cam!!

@AllThingsFilm1

8 ай бұрын

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis I'm tempted to get it. But, I own so many wireless kits. :)

I would definitely choose the sigma today but to be fair Tamron was earlier in the game and released the 11-20 2.8 in 2021. Until sigma released this beauty the Tamron was the only ultra wide 2.8 lens for Sony APSc. Great comparison as always Mark 😊

I know, im here for Mark gorgeous with perfect content

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

🤣

So I was thinking of getting the Sigma but then the Tokina 11-18mm F2.8 (ATX-M) fell into my cart instead at $399. So far I'm loving it. Perhaps if you're able to, maybe adding it to the comparison with these lenses just to see where it aligns?

As a mostly prime user the Sony E 11mm is top tier among the lazy zoom users lol Fully weather sealed F/1.8 Sharper Native lens Cool video as always

Your reviews are amazing. please do a comparison between sony 11mm and sigma 10-18 lens. I need to decide for zv e10.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

6 ай бұрын

what are you shooting?

I hope the Ulanzi Wireless Mic Kit is in the review pipeline. It sounded great and includes internal recording for each mic, just like the big boys and only costs $99 USD.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

yes, coming very soon

I’ve seen that the Sony 10-20 works on FF without any vignette/crop applied. How well do these work on a FF body?

I already have sigma 18-50, need that 10-18.

Thank you for review, Mark. Have you compared geometric distortion of these lenses? Btw, 11mm f1.8 with Active stab looks more stable for sure!

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

the plane of focus is flatter on the sigma, which is why the corners stay sharper

@vvlad78

8 ай бұрын

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Yes, I saw it in sharpness test. I asked about barrel and pincushion distortion.

I have both thanks mark 😂 Quick question was it a pain to install that backdrop roller? Im getting my new studio today and wanna try that out with some savage paper backdrops

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

super easy. I have this one. just dry wall screws into the wall. amzn.to/3sliy56

@Walkingclaxxic

8 ай бұрын

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thank you!

Love them both, but my heart belongs to the Sony 11. 🖤

I'd love the sigma, if not for it's worse weather sealing vs the Tameron. I hope Sony eventually does one without compromise, but at the same time, it's a hard range for them to justify entry into given how competent the competition is here.

@KNAPPAID

8 ай бұрын

Theyre both going for different stakes. The sigmas almost always degault back to sharpness at all cost , disregarding size , corner sharpness to some extent and etc. Tamrons have kinda been supporting sony's non gm and g zoom lenses while going for overall value.

would be nice to check sharpness at 18mm at something else than macro distance....like real world street distance

Can you do a comparison between the Rokinon 12mm f2 and the Sony 11mm?

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

the Sony 11 is much better, but costs a lot more. if you’re just vlogging, the Rokinon will do the job, but the Sony also works better with electronic stabilization but for best quality and especially for photos, and better stabilization, go for the Sony.

This volume and weight, I would definitely choose Sigma, after all, go out to travel or landscape photography, it is certainly easy to carry is the best choice!

Microphone was a champ on your walk and talk clips.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

right??

I have the Tamron and I'm happy with it. I just need to get a camera

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

there’s a good one from Kodak

Its funny that sigma's apsc zoom are always smaller since it is built for apsc and with no compromise ( they couldve used the 28 70 chassis ). While tamrons are always bigger since their apsc and ff stuff is mostly different internals ( 17 70 is in a 2875 chassis with is ). Good on both ends , at least the bigger ones have a reason to exist

pls do it in ZVE1, i am planning to get this...

I am very confused between sigma 10-18 + sigma 18-50 or tamron 11-20 + tamron 17-70 needs for architecture, travel, landscape photography. Do you have any suggestions on which one should I choose? Thanks 🙏🏻

Please compare with 15mm lens

I noticed you were using the Ulanzi mic. If you were using the zve10 what audio settings (preamp level) would you use in camera and what gain on Ulanzi mic. I always seem to come up a little low in audio levels when I publish. Even seeing the camera levels at -12db. Cheers.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

5 ай бұрын

I usually set the Sony to 7 and the default for the ulanzi

@robdelurey1302

5 ай бұрын

Thanks Mark.

Hey Mark, have you ever tried the Tokina 11-18 F2.8 and maybe thought of comparing it to Sigma and Tamron? I am in the market for an ultrawide zoom eight now. What do you think?

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

Ай бұрын

I haven’t tried that one - but I will try to get it in

@HeikosGarage

Ай бұрын

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thank you. I'd appreciate your opinion before I pull the trigger. It seems to be a bit cheaper than the Sigma. There is really no comparison to the Sigma out there.

hi mark, a comparison between the zve10 and the new dji osmo pocket 3 will be very much appreciated. Cheers from The Phillipines!

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

7 ай бұрын

looking into it

@rafter00

7 ай бұрын

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thanks mark

I'm just waiting for Sigma to complete the trifecta with a 50-150mm f2.8 or f4

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

for sure!! get that tele, Sigma

@davidconti_travels

7 ай бұрын

I’m sure it will be a 2.8… Well, at least I hope so 😅

@j16m02

7 ай бұрын

@@davidconti_travels I have mixed feelings on that. As much as I would prefer 2.8, the appeal of the 10-18 and 18-50 is their size for travel. I guess if Sigma could keep it small, 2.8 would be ok, but personally, if it takes a F4.0 to keep the size consistent with the other 2, I'd be willing to do that.

both lenses look great. I would get the cheaper one 😅 Thanks for the video mark!

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

smart!!

Def needed this didnt onow tge sigma existed

Just ordered an interesting lens... Tamron 18-400 for Canon, speedboosted for m43. Can't wait! You wanna talk about a killer travel setup? Yes buddy, 12.87-284mm f2.4-4.4. Ohhh buddy. Sure the 12-100 f4 Pro is sweet but man, really curious to see how this stacks up. Armchair Videographer videos will be coming up as well. Fun times! Newfoundland says hello as well :) Sigma bokeh balls were a little salty haha

Great video. For me, sigma images look a little more washed out compared to tamron. I think I’ll keep my tamron for now.

Watching this video again... I really can't get over how much better the active stabilization is with the Sony 11mm. I have only used 3rd party lenses (aside from the kit lens, which I rarely use) and I feel like I'm always fighting that slight amount of jarring that active stabilization can't reduce, especially when I'm gathering b-roll in a time-sensitive shoot. I'd be curious to see a video comparing native lenses vs. 3rd party for stabilization.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

7 ай бұрын

yes - it is better on active for sure - I'll try to do a video on it soon

@justlivication

7 ай бұрын

I think it would be interesting! A real world comparison! Just re-watching the sony 11 vs tamron 11-20 video, you have it on a gimbal and it's obviously way smoother. I'm trying to rig my camera out so it can go from studio to gimbal/b-roll gathering in a flash. Cheers!@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

When shooting with video with the sigma, can you use the camera's zoom lever to zoom in/out or has it to be done only through the lens' zoom ring? Asking because it is more difficult to use the ring when using a gimbal.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

4 ай бұрын

you can only use the zoom rocker with a power zoom like the Sony 10-20

@johnfilipstad

4 ай бұрын

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thanks for the speedy reply!! Love your videos btw!

Can you compare the Tamron 17-70 to the sigma 18-50?

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

I’ll look into it. Bit they’re both great lenses

I saw a KZread review on the 11 20 tamron the lens has focus breathing in focus for video is bit slow in video . Is it true

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

7 ай бұрын

it does have some focus breathing as I demonstrated in the video. The focus is fine in video.

How do you always know exactly what content I was looking for?

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

you can buy thoughts from Google now.

Wider, smaller AND lighter? The Sigma takes it, easily. What a perfect travel UWA. This lens almost makes me want to stay with APS-C instead of FF for my travel set-up 😅 I really wish their 18-50mm was 16mm at the wide end. The less we need to change out our main lenses for a spacialist lens (i.e. the wide angle), the better.

The Tamron has better weather sealing for outdoor photographers.

please make a video on FUJIFILM X-S20 vs SONY A6700. Please please do it.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

yes - looking into it

@tanmaysakpalofficial

8 ай бұрын

Yeah this would be a great video 🙌

Hi Mark, what about sun stars?

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

actually really comparable and good on both. don’t have any sun here right now to test 😂

I really hope Sigma comes out with a small lightweight 50-150 or 50-135 2.8 ...To complete that series

I like that the Tamron goes to 20mm, but the Sigma looks better for landscape work. Really what I want for landscape is an 10-25mm F3.5. I assume neither of these have OIS?

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

7 ай бұрын

neither has OIS

me gustaría ver una comparativa en astrofotografia 🌃🌟

Pause he said they feel good in the hand or where ever you want to put them lol. 😂

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

2 ай бұрын

🤣

im trying to make a hard decision between sony 11m f1.8 or this lense the sigma 10-18mm f2.8 someone please help !!!

@gamadrid

5 ай бұрын

I'm just thinking the same thing. I bought the 11mm before, and for real estate videography, and vlogging it is wonderful, but for landscaping or street photography, I definitely need to change lenses. I can't justify having both, so I have to make a difficult decision sony 11mm vs sigma 10-18mm. Someone help us.

@Mr_762

5 ай бұрын

i guess ima have to take one for the team as they say ! lol 😂@@gamadrid

@gamadrid

5 ай бұрын

I finally sold the Sony 11mm, now the question is Tamron or Sigma. But I know I'm going to enjoy an ultra-wide-angle zoom more. @@Mr_762

I like the bigger size of the tamron the sigma i know is probably as good or better since sigma makes awesome glass but the small size appears to me like a toy lens the tamron is a good size dor a lens would match perfecr on my r7 witch im watching cuz both these lenses are finally being released to the RF mount on canon so i wanted to see the reviewd on both these lenses since im sure opticalu they will be equal to the RF versions. Thabks for the review very nicely done

251, 255, 270 grams. which is it?

How does the sigma stack up against the Tokina 11-18mm f2.8?

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

6 ай бұрын

I haven’t reviewed the tokina yet

When you turn on the active on the sony . What's the length 10mm become ?

@S._R._

8 ай бұрын

40% crop. Something like a 14 or 15 mm.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

active on the 6700 crops in 10% - so like an 11-12. on the zv-e10 is more like a 14-15 because it’s a bigger crop on the zv-e10

Mark, thank you for the highly entertaining review! It's a nice move of Sigma to give the 10-18mm at least one "weak" point compared to the Tamron, which would be the close-up center sharpness 😉But to be honest, without Tamron's 11-20mm there might be no Sigma 10-18mm, so thanks Tamron for going ahead, and showing Sigma what works on the market (😉 emoji, again). I finally sold my Sony 11mm F1.8 today, and am now waiting for the Sigma 10-18mm to arrive. Seems there's a bit of order backlog on the 10-18, at least here in Germany...

@joshuaaruiz

8 ай бұрын

Why’d you sell your 11mm tho?

@jhirse3547

8 ай бұрын

@@joshuaaruiz It's an excellent lens. But I almost never used it. The 10-18mm is far more flexible and I assume I will use it much more. Also I don't have the budget to have 1200€ of ultra wide angle lenses laying around ;)

@gamadrid

5 ай бұрын

Some time later, as has been your use of the sigma 10-18mm, I have the Sony 11mm and I would like to know if it is a good idea to change it for the sigma. @@jhirse3547

Mark, is it possible to take black background photos without an actual black background or flash?

@DDavEE

8 ай бұрын

The iPhone camera’s Portrait Mode has a Stage Light option that can do that.

@tiltedbybox6118

8 ай бұрын

@@DDavEE I rather buy a flash than an iphone

@Tonyrizk13

8 ай бұрын

Yes

@tiltedbybox6118

8 ай бұрын

@@Tonyrizk13 How?

@Tonyrizk13

8 ай бұрын

@@tiltedbybox6118 in photoshop or in Lightroom or using a bright enough constant light

it is so hard to choose man

"they both feel really good in the hand or wherever else you like to put them" XD

🤔, tough choice

First!🎉

Hi Mark, I really enjoy all your videos, but can you choose a better outdoor location to shoot, all your outdoor videos are shot in the zombie ghettos in Baltimore, which is depressing. Thank you.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

I am walking in my neighbourhood - so… thanks??

@sgtmango-ko4lw

5 ай бұрын

😂 give mark a break

As I commented on Mark's Sigma 10-18 video, I bought the Tamron 11-20 the day I learned from Mark that the new Sigma was released. Comparing number-wise I had a bit of buyer's remorse. 🙈 But I brought the Tamron along on a recent trip where I shot a lot of video with it, and I was pleasantly surprised with the extra reach the Tamron has. I'd have to switch lenses much more often with the Sigma. That 20mm doesn't sound like much, but it just makes the shots feel less "wide angle", than the still relatively wide feel of 18mm. I recommend trying for yourself to compare the two.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

this is a good point. I should have emphasized that you do get some more reach on the Tamron. and it’s a magnificent lens!!

@scannerapps3503

7 ай бұрын

I have not fully decided on the sigma vs the tamron yet. I have been very happy with my canon 28-75 tamron for years. And now I find the tamron 11-20 on sale about $100cdn cheaper than the sigma. This video is a good comparison. Tamron sharper in the middle where it counts the most really.

@bartverkoeijen

7 ай бұрын

@@scannerapps3503 Recommend to compare the two in your hands. Last week had the chance to hold the Sigma, and boy is it lighter! There’s that mental thing on whether you’d grab a lens with you, and weight counts a lot. Especially for a focal range that isn’t the usual mid-range. The other day I weighted my options (pun intended) whether I wanted to carry the extra weight of the 11-20, or found 17 wide enough. The Sigma would have been a no-brainer.

You are frickin hilarious

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

😂

It only sounds dirty because we like camera gear so much 👌🏻

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

🤣🤣

Does the little passerby also wonder about the lives of the lives of the 38k people watching the video. She likely should. :-) Now that these lenses are coming to the Canon R APS-C line-up, I can start paying attention. Except for the price, I'm really not terribly wild about my RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 and glad to see that there are going to be options.

I thought about the Sigma but for a little more you can get that Pocket 3 and not stand out as much….😂

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

Yes - looks like a fun device for sure

The Sigma really kicks you in the bokeh balls.

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

Ай бұрын

right in there!!

Second 😂

Vlogging in your 40s, and you wonder why you feel so naughty :D

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

I’m young at heart - and immature

@petersuvara

8 ай бұрын

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis I only started vlogging in my 40s ... it's what you do when you decide you love cameras and lenses... :)

I did really like the video. Am I crazy, how does it have 14k likes but 7.8k views. Am I crazy? That’s impossible right?

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

7 ай бұрын

I think that must be a glitch. this video has 406 likes.

Try to do a normal walk when it come to vlogging and please stop about catalyst, I even paid for premium version but still took 1 hour for 3 mins clip on my Asus ROG DUO 16 $3000 laptop

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

I am walking normally. You can’t walk fast when vlogging - it looks ridiculous and no mirrorless camera will look good. People are not walking at a fast pace in movies for good reason. I still use catalyst all the time. Many people do. My computer takes 3 minutes for one minute of footage. What you want is an action cam - you’ll never be satisfied with cameras if you’re going to walk carelessly and briskly

@Jimmyageek

8 ай бұрын

​@@MarkBennettCameraCrisisare you serious ? Only 3 mins? Please make a video on catalyst

For me, 2mm length is more important instead of 1mm wider + center sharpness. Definitely Tamron is the winner!!!

@pdub422

5 ай бұрын

Interesting argument that the better wide angle is the one with less wide angle 😂

@nicuchitineac1950

5 ай бұрын

@pdub422 The perfect lens for me would be the 10-35mm f2.8 in APSC mode, but the 12-28mm would also work. 😁

@pdub422

5 ай бұрын

@@nicuchitineac1950 everyone has their use case, I'm just teasing about the wanting more zoom, I have the Tamron 17-70 so don't really need the top end of the 11-20, although I do own that 11-20, I got it a couple years ago and it's a very nice lens! I just got the 70-350 Sony recently and excited to use that more, it's nice having all these new options popping up!

@martinphilipps8678

5 ай бұрын

You can always crop in, but you cant add to your frame if the lens isn't wide enough. Objectively i think sigma wins here, as it is wider. The missing 2mm at the long end are no issue at all with cropping.

Please give one of the two for 200€/$/£

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis

8 ай бұрын

I don’t own either of these lenses - loaned copies

@leodileodileo

8 ай бұрын

i was kidding 200 buck is far less then the actual price. I will buy the sigma once I find a good deal.@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis