IS 2720 Part 4-1985Sieve analysis of soil passing 4.75 mm IS sieve and retained on 75-micron IS sieve* DRY sieving *WET sieving
The BS1377 wet sieving method is more straightforward, thank you
Very comprrhensive Thanks for sharing
Thank you sir.
Why was 1.18 mm seive placed over 2.36 mm it was obvious it won't have any retention The correct order would be 4.75-2.36 then 1.18
"Yes, you are correct. It was a descriptive error."
Since sieve of 2.36 is misplaced below 1.18 the entire test result would change
Wet sieve analysis 11:58
ty
HI sir this instrument company share sir
2.36 mm should be above 1.18 mm
Пікірлер: 11
The BS1377 wet sieving method is more straightforward, thank you
Very comprrhensive Thanks for sharing
Thank you sir.
Why was 1.18 mm seive placed over 2.36 mm it was obvious it won't have any retention The correct order would be 4.75-2.36 then 1.18
@CivilEngineeringVibes
5 ай бұрын
"Yes, you are correct. It was a descriptive error."
Since sieve of 2.36 is misplaced below 1.18 the entire test result would change
Wet sieve analysis 11:58
@glocktopus888
10 ай бұрын
ty
HI sir this instrument company share sir
2.36 mm should be above 1.18 mm
@CivilEngineeringVibes
5 ай бұрын
"Yes, you are correct. It was a descriptive error."