Thank you so much sir You've done justice with your explanation

Thank u sir .. u r explanation is excellent sir ..u r way of talking is too good ...

@structuralanalysisanddesign

3 жыл бұрын

So nice of you, keep watching and supporting

It’s very informative and understandable

It was a very very useful video to me, Thank you sir for giving such a nice explanation

@structuralanalysisanddesign

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you, keep watching, all the best

Excellent explanation

I'm very interesting to follow all what you do on this chanel and I would like to beg whether possible to show us some important or application of what you test in civil engineering work or how it can be used as a tool in other calculation. Thank u engineer

Very well explained

@structuralanalysisanddesign

6 ай бұрын

Thank you for watching, all the best

informative and useful vedio 👌 thanks 🙏

Thanks sir this is very helpful for us

Tq u sir gave me kind Information ❤

Very nice sir nice to meet you

Excellent demo....👍👍👍

@structuralanalysisanddesign

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! 👍 all the best, keep watching and sharing

Mast video h sir...

Thank you sir nice explanation

Your video is Soo sweet, thanks v. Much

@structuralanalysisanddesign

3 ай бұрын

So nice of you, keep watching and sharing, all the best

Tq for excellent explanation sir

Very good sir

@structuralanalysisanddesign

2 ай бұрын

Thank you, keep sharing, all the best

Very helpful

Thank you sir 🎉

Thank you sir

Thank u sir . Nice explanation

@structuralanalysisanddesign

2 жыл бұрын

Most welcome, keep supporting

Super sir🎉

Sir excellent explain bs sir thoda hindi bhi use kre plz

Excellent sir 👍

@structuralanalysisanddesign

2 жыл бұрын

So nice of you, all the best, keep watching

tq

Sir it was nice explaination but at the time of fineness modulus, summation of %age retained is 310.93 not 211.65.... plz correct me

@amr_of_lagos

Жыл бұрын

Don't add the value of the pan

Sir tell me about difference between Bulk density, PSD & sieve analysis

Thank you

@structuralanalysisanddesign

4 жыл бұрын

Welcome, Keep supporting us

@musfiqueordinaryfact6356

4 жыл бұрын

All About Structural Analysis and Design yeah always

what if the FM value is less than 2 ? Can we use such an aggregate for plastiring work ? In the last interpretation, u said it is between 600 micron & 300 micron..but its only 2.11 and should be between 300 micron & 150 micron

sir query 1 - which zone fine aggregate used for for what kind of work either for construction work or for plastering work a fine aggregate (or fine/medium/coarse sand) will used. is there any kind of prescribed differentiation mention that if uor result lies in zone-3 then yhis fine aggregate will used in concreting / platsering i mean how can one differentiate? query no 2- what about coarse aggregate sieve analysis. why we do it is there any kind of reason belongs to strentgth if one cant do these analysis. quest no 3- how can i decide the sample amount teachers create so much confusion for the sample to be taken of fine aggregate(here).

Thank you 🙏🏿

@structuralanalysisanddesign

9 ай бұрын

Welcome, keep watching, all the best

Thank you sir, clear explanation and well understood

@structuralanalysisanddesign

2 жыл бұрын

You are welcome, thank you so much, all the best

Pls can you shed more light on the micron region where majority of the sand lies due to the finest modulus?

Sir, if FM of coarse sand exceeds its limit then what it indicates??

the calculate methed of fineness modulus is very old,has been phased out.I calclated it was 2.07

Thankhu. M

It will be more convenient to use if screening equipment is used

Sir in gopal ranjan book it is written that sieves required for fine sieve analysis is 4.75 mm, 2 mm 1 mm, 600 micron, 425 micron, 212 micron, 150 micron and 65 micron . But when we do it according to IS 383 sirve size is different. Why is that?

@structuralanalysisanddesign

3 жыл бұрын

Kindly follow IS Codal Provisions

@kamleshdce

3 жыл бұрын

ppp

what about for coarse aggregates

🙏🙏❤❤

@structuralanalysisanddesign

2 жыл бұрын

All the best, keep watching and supporting

It is only the most important sieve for fine aggregate and coarse

@structuralanalysisanddesign

4 жыл бұрын

Coarse aggregate no where considers 75 micron sieve, For Fine and Coarse 4.75mm is the main sieve because this is the sieve which divides aggregates into fine and coarse

Please re-check...the sample is in Grading zone II

Then what about 0.075micron sieve

@structuralanalysisanddesign

4 жыл бұрын

If you go through IS 2386 and IS 383, they have not mentioned 75 micron sieve so i have not taken in this video, if you take and do nothing wrong, most of the colleges take 75 micron sieve and do, as code has not mentioned so i have not taken 75 Micron sieve

Sir " finnesss modulus of aggregate" और "sieve analysis of aggregate " both test is similer ????

@amansinhparmar7186

2 жыл бұрын

Yes

Hello, I have a question concerning the FM of 2.11 and how you determine where it lies in the sieve size. How do we know that it fits between 300 micron and 600 micron? How does 2.11 tell us the sieve size?

@neekeshpradhan8957

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah my question too. How was it determined? Guess he ended up creating greater confusion than actually resovling one.

@gsreegh

3 жыл бұрын

Description and calculations here...please check out www.transcalc.com/finenessmoduluscalc1trace

@nukleerbasl6158

2 жыл бұрын

Still not resolved?

@perumalsamyramesh5775

Жыл бұрын

They already explained i.e 2.11 From downwards to upward (except pan) 150 mic - 1st sieve 300 mic - 2nd sieve 600 mic - 3rd sieve There our FM is 2.11 that means max. Aggregate was lies between 2nd and 3rd sieve i.e b/w 300-600mic

10 mm sieve no need haa sir

@structuralanalysisanddesign

Жыл бұрын

Ha no need

It is so disgusting to know that your first retain weigh does not have any values despite having few retain. Please get a sensitive scale. As a suggestion, Japanese weigh the retain with sieves itself and later deduct the weight of each sieves. This will make work easier and leave no soil particles unweighted.

Wrong ❌

Very well explained

Thank you sir

@structuralanalysisanddesign

4 жыл бұрын

Welcome, stay tuned for more videos

Thank you sir

@structuralanalysisanddesign

4 жыл бұрын

Welcome, stay tuned for more videos