great explanation, thanks!

great explanation

Thanks for the video! In the first example, would the last term of heaviside functions (u3-u4) be subtracted instead of added onto the equation since it is dropping at t=3?

@ericcytrynbaum

2 жыл бұрын

I included the minus sign in the function (4-t) so your suggestion would be correct if you changed that to (t-4).

Nice explanation

I can't get the slopes part & substracting part

Is it possible to write a ramp than increases from 0 whenever f(x) it's 0?

@ericcytrynbaum

Жыл бұрын

I’m not sure what you mean.

@gradozero8140

Жыл бұрын

@@ericcytrynbaum Thank you, I would like to create an Heaviside H(x) function that creates an increasing ramp whenever another function f(x) composed by irregular impulses is = 0. This is for tracking the timing between the impulses (the maximum of the ramp=time between the two specific impulses). However, I'm struggling in trying to make the ramp starting from 0, because the easiest way is to make the Heaviside = x whenever f(x) is equal 0, but in this case, the ramp starts from the actual value of x and not from 0. I would have to subtract something but I don't know what, because this is not known in advance, and if I would already know the spacing between the impulses, I wouldn't need the ramp ...

@ericcytrynbaum

Жыл бұрын

@@gradozero8140 If the impulses are at times t_i, then maybe you want something like this: g(t) = sum over i of (H(t-t_i)-H(t-t_{i+1}))(t-t_i) ?

@gradozero8140

Жыл бұрын

@@ericcytrynbaum Thank you very much. It seems this fits well for regular impulses. But if the impulses are not regular, I'm trying to find a rule to make the ramp starting from 0 whenever f(x)=0 like H(x)=[f(x)

Well done, I like the explanation!

Gracias

there were no laplace transforms in this video. thanks by the way

@ericcytrynbaum

7 жыл бұрын

Good point. The title is a bit misleading, I guess.

H(1-|t|) explanation please

@ericcytrynbaum

3 жыл бұрын

This didn't appear in the video but it's just a slick way of writing a function that is 1 for -1

The title sucks, indeed. but the content is great, thanks!

@ericcytrynbaum

2 жыл бұрын

Good point. Changed.

unfortunetly, you havent taught us really.and you have done it probably intentioanally.

@ezzaddinal-soufi3101

2 жыл бұрын

he made this Video not for u , so be nice if u dont unterstood what he did