Dear viewers, please donate to support the show: www.quranspeaks.com

@janeeditdat6327

3 жыл бұрын

Im from the Netherlands. I wanted to donate but I have no paypal. Any other option to donate? Jazakallahu khayran

@ashishchabra

3 жыл бұрын

Religion of peace contribute 98% of terrorism....

@ashishchabra

3 жыл бұрын

@J A B B A why should I cry it shows your own religion mentality

@QuranSpeaks

3 жыл бұрын

@@janeeditdat6327 thank you so much for your noble intention to support our work. May Allah reward you. You don't need to have a PayPal account to donate. We are simply using PayPal as a platform to process your donation on our website. So you do not need to sign it...you can use your credit card to make a donation. If you are not comfortable with this option, let us know and we can find another way!

@janeeditdat6327

3 жыл бұрын

@@QuranSpeaks amin. May Allah swt reward you also! Unfortunately i also have no credit card... Is there any other way to donate?

The Holy Prophet said ' Ali is with the Quran and the Quran is with Ali.. they shall never depart unti they meet me at the well of kautsar'...

Masha'Allah...Shukran Jazillan for the extensive and thorough explanation Dr. Shabir

May Allah swt bless you sir, for sharing such a usufull information.

@abdullahibraheem1990

3 жыл бұрын

Ameen

Very informative and nice dialogue

Great Info - Thank you

Thank you sir

The find of ancient Quronic texts in 1972 is much like when they found the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947 with scriptures from the Bible.

@T.T.T416

Ай бұрын

Not really the Dead Sea scrolls only corresponds to the Old Testament.

@Let the quran speak Can you put a link to this mushaf?

Assalamualaikum, Let's be at one with all of our brother's and sister's and unite with peace and happiness for Allah is the almighty. 🙏🏻

Do someone have a pdf of this quran?

Did any of you actually went and check this information for themselves?

I am confused so was this version compiled by Ali rA/ As how was it attributed towards him?

@NRFP

Жыл бұрын

Its completed by last prophet Muhammad(s)

Both of them have the same holy book Qur'an but it is extremely different from when they interpret it.

Thank you Dr. Shabir for discussing the history of the Quran. However, I still don't understand part of its history. Perhaps someone can help me? We are taught that Allah's divine message captured in the Quran is pure, clear and unaltered. That it has not, and must never, be changed or modified in any way. Yet, history and Islamic tradition also teach us that we no longer have the original message as revealed to Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم. The original ṣuḥufin were destroyed on purpose under the orders of Caliph Uthmān with the permission of either Hafsa's brother or Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan. Ḥafṣah’s codex was the original source from which we get the Uthmān’s codex, (our present day Quran). Therefore, 'it' must, of course have been, the purest, most trustworthy and unadulterated version of Allah's message. Yet this original was deliberately destroyed! Why? How could this authoritative, articulate, original be in any way perceived as a threat worthy of being burnt? How could this foundational Mus'haf lead truth seekers astray? The only logical reason is that it conflicted with Uthmān’s final compiled codex. His revised, and later updated version, (rasm script to the scripta plena), is not -and can never logically be- the original message that was dictated verbatim to Muhammad because it has been undeniably filtered over 350 years by many men; some clearly with their own agenda's. This is of course one of the reason for the original Sunni-Shia conflict. All the best

1. How the author/analysis concluded it was attributed to Ali (bias for Shia?) Is it only a conjecture or an assumption based on consequential evidence? 2. Muhammad (pbuh) was the one who received the Quran, and he mentored his close companions to write it down. The Prophet had scribes of the text, which included Zaid Ibn Thabit, which was widely known to be his personal scribe of Quran. Only his close companions and personal scribe can authenticate the Quran that was given to the Prophet. 3. Different spellings, vocalisation or ways of reading could make things confusing, so the final committee, which was made of certified members of the Prophet have decided that a unified codex ie Uthmani codex to prevent confusion 4.The final committee which formulated the Uthmani codex included Zaid Ibn Thabit, and this is an extremely important point for authenticity, as he was the personal scribe to the Prophet 5. The final committee which formulated the Uthmani codex instructed/decided to burn other copies of Quran as those those were not written by the endorsed companions, nor were they endorsed by the final committee, thus those copies are not the actual Quran known by the certified members of the committee and likely contain error/variations written by non-authenticated or unknown scribe(s). 6. Some critics accused that the burning of Quran has something to do with hiding evidence. But burning of Quran is done even today, when certain Muslim authority discovered misprinted version of Quran (sometimes mass printing error happens). Such an authority has the power to burn those erroneous copies, because they are faulty version of Quran. The final committee of the Uthamani codex has the authority to dispose Quran written by non-authenticated persons that are not the close companions of Muhammad (pbuh) 7. Although we can study the Sanaa text for comparative purpose, it can safely be concluded that the text from Sanaa mosque was not endorsed by the certified members of the Prophet, and this must be highlighted. The final committee (with had the rightful authority to certify the Quran) instructed that other copies that are not endorsed by them are not to be accepted and are to be disposed off/destroyed.

@ThePiPerspective-mg8bb

Ай бұрын

You shallow knowledge and lack of understanding is evident from your lengthy post

MashaALLAH waching from philipines

I have no idea why you even keep coming back to this. There are enough videos about it, and the Christian can cry about it till he is blue in the face

@NeoLegendX

3 жыл бұрын

@@heruherdi_an yes However I don't know you, first time seeing you.

@NeoLegendX

3 жыл бұрын

@@heruherdi_an I can respect that.

I want to eagerly learn about Islam but there is no one to give me the knowledge of Allah.

@arifalmalaibari4021

2 жыл бұрын

Zakir Naik

@Be-blessed

Жыл бұрын

please search for Dr zakir nayek

A Person who have understood whole Quran knows well that Quran have not just blasted Tafarqa in one Ummah but Quran has also said, Firqa/Tafarqa spreaders are Khaarjite who take exit from Islam by making Sects/Tafarqa 6:159. Quran further tells in 3:105 that Hell is waiting Sect followers. Therefore, if we understand Quran precisely and honestly, Sunni Shia and all other sects are not Muslims. They became out of Islam by making Sects. Historically, Roots of Sunni sect and Shia sect are in Judaism and Zoroastrianism because their almost all Non-Quranic Books which they follow more than Quran are full of reports which were imported from Talmud and books of Zoroastrians. Quran has used word La-Tafaraqu in 3:103, and then have said, Hold Fast Rope of Allah. Arabic word Tafaraq has broad meanings which mean ANY KIND of Firqa/Division/Split/Grouping. But many sect followers hide their these Divisions under different words/names like "School of thought", but fact is: That so called School of Thoughts have also created Split and Grouping in One Ummah. If a Donkey hides itself with Skin of a Lion, he will still be called a Donkey. For example: Hope Dr Shabbir Aly knows about it, that all the four, Hanafi, Malaki, Shafi'i and Hanbli lift their index finger in Tahshahhud in different ways, they dance the finger in different ways. Did Quran/prophet tell them to do so? From Adam to last Prophet Mohammad PBUH, God has named us only Muslim in 22:78. So it is Great to be Muslim only without any sect.

3 жыл бұрын

Factszz Aisha reported: The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: “Whoever innovates into this matter of ours that which does not belong to it, it will be rejected.” - Sahih al-Bukhari 2550. After Muhammad died, the people who lived with him and knew his religion best immediately fell into war with each other. Fatima, Muhammad’s favorite daughter survived the early years among the unbelievers at Mecca safe and sound, yet died of stress from the persecution of fellow Muslims six months after her father died. She even miscarried Muhammad’s grandchild after having her ribs broken by the man who became the second Caliph. It was this same Caliph, Umar who ordered the death of the first convert to islam at Medina, an elderly leader who became a close companion to Muhammad and proved his worth in battle. Sa’d ibn Ubadah was killed after a failed bid to be Caliph. Fatima’s husband Ali, who was the second convert to islam and was raised like a son to Muhammad, fought a civil war against an army raised by Aisha Muhammad’s favorite wife and one whom he had was a “perfect woman.” 10,000 Muslims were killed in a single internal battle waged less than 25 years after Muhammad’s death. Three of the first four muslim rulers (Caliphs) were murdered and all of them among Muhammad’s closest companions. The fourth Caliph (Ali) was stabbed to death after a bitter dispute with the fifth. The fifth Caliph went on to poison one of Muhammad’s two favorite grandsons. The other grandson was later beheaded by the sixth Caliph. Within 50 short years of Muhammad’s death, even the Kaaba which had stood for centuries under pagan religion, lay in ruins from internal Muslim war. We must also consider how plausible it is that the early Muslim community reassigned its origins to a different city than that of its actual birthplace. Most revisionists allege that Muslims made the change during islam’s classical period for political reasons. Yet how believable is it that islam originated not in Mecca but in Petra or somewhere else in Nabatea. And that just the fate of those within the house of islam who amongst the peoples who had guaranteed by Muhammad to enter Paradise. Today, Muslims continued their Jihad against the unbelievers for 1400 years. None of other religions in this world are at war with each other except islam that so called the religion of peace!

@denizisi7245

3 жыл бұрын

@ This perfectly shows how Islam got corrupted. Muslims have left the Quran and follow non quranic writings. If we go by the Quran, Islam is indeed the religion of peace, but if we go by the Ahadith then it’s hard to know.

@denizisi7245

3 жыл бұрын

@ If you take verses out of context it’s easy to say that Islam is violent. It tells us to fight when we are being attacked, why don’t you guys get it. There are enough verses that say “I have my religion you have your religion”. All these claims have been debunked long time ago yet I see people making claims against the Quran. Criticize the Ahadith, I don’t care, because they were written by enemies of Islam, but these claims against the Quran have never worked.

@akongvlogg9737

3 жыл бұрын

Shukran. I'am Muslim Not Sunni or Shia.

@denizisi7245

3 жыл бұрын

@@akongvlogg9737 Nice 👍

Christians have the same problem, to a more severe extent. Surely an all-powerful god could inspire a book that isn't so easily interpreted in more than one way. In a worldview where god knows everything, he would have known that these multiple interpretations would cause drama. it seems like he did this on purpose. Or, a more likely scenario: the book isn't inspired by an all-powerful god, but by the men that wrote it.

@hassanayo6368

2 жыл бұрын

You sound like you did not watch the video my friend. Shabir basically says the manuscript was written up to a 100 years after the Original Quran was produced and it is almost identical except some changes in linguistic style. The Quran has stood the test of time to be scientifically, historically, ethically and logically correct. Do not play yourself, the copies of the bible everyone reads today is a compilation of different books which were compiled nearly 600 years after the supposedly 'death' of jesus, this same bible has over a 1000 errors. Muslims believe that the original books that inspired the bible were divine however it has been corrupted overtime, hence why there are so many errors (zakir did a video on this). The Quran has not one error.

@DavidKnowles

2 жыл бұрын

@@hassanayo6368 Please do not fall into the trap of exaggeration. It's unhelpful. If you don't know something for sure, it's perfectly ok to say, I don't know, or i'll get back to you. I say this because the bible was not compiled 600 years after the supposed 'death' of Jesus. Specifically, the Catholic canon was set at the Council of Rome (382), if that is what you were referring to? But remember, a written compilation of Allah's revelation was never commanded. Neither Abraham, Moses nor any of the pre Muhammad prophets were told by Allah "this will be part of the finalized canon (compilation)". The same goes for the Injil. Allah did not dictate what books would form the true Injil. Lastly, there is no record that I am aware where Muhammad, (peace be upon him), is commanded to ensure that what he recited was written down. In fact, it is very clear that much was not written down at all. The emphasis only changed much later, when so many warriors were lost in war. This clearly shows that for 2000 years the lack of a canon, (compilation of Allah's words), was not a big issue for our creator. As to your comment that 'The Quran has not one error'. It depends on how you define 'an error'. The Sana'a manuscript contain 5000+ deviations from the Uthman codex, (which is the foundation of our present day Quran). Most Muslims would not consider these as errors. There are many occasions is the Quran where Allah gives a command, then in a later passage overrides this command. This would also not be considered an error. The Quran contains many Spelling, syntax and grammar 'deviations', that hinder the clarity of the message. Most believers brush these aside. There are also scientific and historical inaccuracies. Would these be considered errors? My purpose here is to show hubris is very unhelpful, and daring to be honest is incredibly difficult. God knows the truth and does not need man's help to defend Him. The truth sets us free. I wish you well

@DavidKnowles

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Some Random, Your argument is built on a couple of false premises:- - everyone is always honest - everyone is able to understand everything all the time Are you always honest? Are there things you can't get your head around? I don't think it presumptuous to conclude we all struggle with both. The question is why, and how could an all-powerful God deal with these fairly. The scriptures make clear that God spoke clearly to the first man, but he was disobedient. They describe a world full of purpose and free from decay or evil. But mankind desired the knowledge of evil. Mankind still does. Evil corrupts. Our world is now broken and so are we. Every action has its consequence. But there is hope. Despite our continued selfish, arrogant and destructive behaviour, God in His loving mercy did not abandon us. On the contrary, He anticipated this and embedded His plan of redemption right from the beginning. The scriptures are His strategic, progressive revelation of His plan of redemption. We read how God originally walked amongst mankind, but because of the continued rebellion, God gradually gives such people over to the futility of their foolishness. God requires each of us personally to be honest and have some humility. The truth is, we sometimes mean well, but we are trapped in our corruption. No one is good enough. God is holy and can not allow wilful dishonesty to go uncorrected. No loving father would. Justice must be done because God is just. We desperately need His forgiveness. And it is available. For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. There is more to it of course but, I'll leave it at that for now. I wish you all the best. Take care.

@somerandom3247

2 жыл бұрын

​@@DavidKnowles My argument isn't built on those premises at all..... Why should I be concerned with what the scriptures say? None of it is actually true.

@DavidKnowles

2 жыл бұрын

​@@somerandom3247 Your statement intrinsically depends on everyone being completely open and honest all the time. But that is clearly not the case. Everyone struggles with confirmation bias. Even you sir. In addition, your premise expects Einstein and a child to perceive and interpret the world in the same way. But that is clearly impossible, because there are obviously different levels of ability. Both Einstein's and the child's view of the world can both be true without them being identical. Fluffy clouds look fluffy to a child, but we know they are not. If wish you every success with your search for the truth.

The majority of the tafseer of the shia and many of there major hadiths state that the quran was changed Astafirullah and also they belive in massaf fatima. I love shabir ally but acting like they are our brothers is not only wrong its dangerous. Never will somebody who makes takfeer on the sahaba and the wives of the prophet s.a.w our brother or a muslim

@alio6051

3 жыл бұрын

Your hate gets in the way of your opinion. That means you have a biased opinion. I am shia and I know for a fact massaf fatima is a myth made up by some british shia scholars to confuse the ummah and turn us against each other. It is like yasir Qadi for the sunnis who makes up things and creates new madhabs with very little knowledge of the deen. May Allah Unite us

@kingsalladin6445

3 жыл бұрын

@@alio6051 there is a video where khomeini is talking and praising massaf fatima, i swear by ALLAH. Everybody can see it and knows it. What i can see is that the diffrence between shirazi shias and khomeini or sistani shias is mostly only political. But aqedah, deen is almost 1 to 1 the same. The thing is we live in the time of information. We can see and read all by our selfs. And VALLAHI i can even speak from personal experience with shias. Its not hatred. And the comment is 7 months ago. Alot of changed. Shabir ally is a heretic like yasir qadi.

@alio6051

3 жыл бұрын

​@@kingsalladin6445 Its not political brother. You haven't read much about it to even say that. You are saying everything out of bias towards Shias and that's why you immediately claimed that Dr. Shabir Ally is a heretic when in reality Dr Shabir not only a scholar whose studied the Quran page to page but also a doctor in human behavior . Dr Shabir Ally's Knowledge is MILES greater than that of Yasir Qadhi who says the Quran isn't the true word of Allah(swT) because it is corrupted. So you are saying that DR Shabir Ally is a heritic just because of he doesn't consider SHias kufar this is wrong to say because you are talking out of hate and not using rational arguments.

I guess abu bakr forgot to burn this one

@ekkopoohbear9236

3 жыл бұрын

@budaba khaka doesn't matter. There is proof that the quranic narrative has holes

@ekkopoohbear9236

3 жыл бұрын

@@cloudgil1862 correction. Mohammed recited the quran. abu bakr edited and revised it according to how he wanted it. Bukhari created hadiths known as quran version 2.0

Quran is false. Because any one answer what happens to the Qur'an is written and directly verified by Muhammad and he have that collection in his home. What happens to that. As per your history your third caliph burnned everything. We don't know it includes Muhammad nahi Qur'an the original Qur'an. You preserved Muhammad belongings include his cap and other items but you are not have Qur'an written and verified by Muhammad. But you all say you have Qur'an is not modified. Even mental also will not belive you all. Funny guys. Go and do work for your socity

@arifalmalaibari4021

2 жыл бұрын

Bro.. there are many challenges and fortification tests put forth to the world and people like you are free to come out and accept and do at least one of the challenges.. And if you can't do.. then you are closing your eyes in front of the truth... وَإِن كُنتُمۡ فِي رَيۡبٖ مِّمَّا نَزَّلۡنَا عَلَىٰ عَبۡدِنَا فَأۡتُواْ بِسُورَةٖ مِّن مِّثۡلِهِۦ وَٱدۡعُواْ شُهَدَآءَكُم مِّن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ إِن كُنتُمۡ صَٰدِقِينَ And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful. -Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 23

Both of them have the same holy book Qur'an but it is extremely different from when they interpret it.

Both of them have the same holy book Qur'an but it is extremely different from when they interpret it.

Both of them have the same holy book Qur'an but it is extremely different from when they interpret it.

Both of them have the same holy book Qur'an but it is extremely different from when they interpret it.