Your support helps the good work, JazakumAllahu Khairan: Patreon: www.patreon.com/haqeeqat

@muslimresponse103

Жыл бұрын

may Allah reward you for your hard work on defending the Truth - Islam! 🤲🏻 ameen.

@mizenkah

Жыл бұрын

Ameen brother thank you dear admin for your hard work and clarifying this topic and debunking the nonsense by muqdima channel❤ may Allah reward you for speaking out the truth!

you have explained it so thoroughly. May Allah increase you in knowledge and barakah and grant you high positions .

@Haqeeqat

11 ай бұрын

Ameen, thank you brother.

@aamirbilal3205

11 ай бұрын

@@Haqeeqat Brother Alhamdulelah people like you have always raised our heads with pride. Your critique is based on available and observable facts of this manuscript as well as based on sources from Islamic literature. The astonishing fact is that these objections are not new to Islam and The Qurani. and have already been answered in the very times of the prophet and companions as clearly found in Islamic traditions. May Allah be pleased with you and give you the strength to present islam in it's TRUE spirit Amin

Great work. Keep it up.

Such details. Thank you for the research and the effort you have put into.👍👏👌💫

@Haqeeqat

11 ай бұрын

You're welcome.

@munnaza23

11 ай бұрын

@@Haqeeqat they way you have countered the arguments is really good. Make more videos ike these.

after 6 days, consecutive searching for best video, finally my algorithm suggested me this video...Allah is great, i searched for truth and i finally find it..Thankyou keep it up your work..Plz dont go for propagandist videos..even we dont know how ignorant they are and what are their intentions.

Great explanation dude

Hello, please could you add your contact details in description box? I have a few questions regarding this manuscript and hope you can help.

Allah razı olsun videonuz çok güzel. Çok bilgi sahibi oldum vesilenizle.

Really wish you'd mentioned me in this since you keep addressing me directly. I'm only seeing this now.

@Haqeeqat

Жыл бұрын

I replied to my previous comment on your video that I am going to upload a response but somehow my comment got disappeared, I tried a couple more times. At first I thought that you were deleting my comment but later I came to know that there was some problem going on with YT and my comments were disappearing on other videos as well. Anyway I am glad that you watched it.

@rhetoric5173

Жыл бұрын

you even know Arabic?

@rhetoric5173

Жыл бұрын

@@Haqeeqat he's a رجس

@essamarkhoun95

2 ай бұрын

so will you do some correction after seeing this?

@Visibleconfusion97

Ай бұрын

​@@essamarkhoun95he did it as an academic and historian point of view... Not a scholarly way to teach people about islam... He cleared any biases and taught transparency... Nothing wrong in that

Very informative video. However i was a bit shocked when you called al muqadimah stupid. We need more debate on these topics.

This vedio is great ❤ Is there manuscripts of same verses in sanaa manuscript available dates before sanaa with out any differences??

Alhamdulillah. Jazzakallahu khoiron katsiiroo

May Allah bless you abundantly. Dont think just because u only got 4800 views it was not worth it, it was inshaAllah. This video is a gem.

May ALLAH bless you with millions of subscribers

JAZAKALLAH I have been searching about the Sanaa menuscript since I first heard about it.beautifully explained and well articulated. JAZAKALLAH.

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاتة Brother Haqeeqat, you have done a great job. I have some comments I hope you take with an open heart: 1- in 27:55 you say the bible scholars didn't know to distinguish between a camel and a heavy. It comes to my mind the verse in Surah Al-A'raf7:40 where scholars have different interpretations based on the way of reciting the verse. Can you clarify more about this? Because I didn't see the difference. 2- I wish you put the references to increase your authenticity and make it more academic. جزاك الله خير

@Haqeeqat

Жыл бұрын

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته I appreciate your comment, and I know that Dr. Ali Mansour Kayali made a video where he made the claim that even the word mentioned in the Qur'an is "Jummal" (Heavy rope) and not "Jamal" (Camel). And that there is a Qira'ah reported that supports the claim. And our brother Naif Alajmey made a response where he refuted this claim. If you know Arabic you can watch his video: هل المراد بالجمل البعير أم الحبل الغليظ ؟ د. نايف العجمي I am also going to post a video in response to a video titled, The Wicked Bible by hochelaga where at time @6:32 he repeated the claim and preferred the word "Heavy rope" over "Camel", and in my video I will prove that the original word was "Camel", and the expression of camel or elephant passing through the eye of a needle was common among the Jews. And the video will be filled with references In Sha' Allah. جزاك الله خيرا

great work, MashaAllah

do more of these videos on historical matters in academia please, this was excellent.

@Haqeeqat

2 жыл бұрын

More of these are coming...

@gajiburrahman7378

Жыл бұрын

Assalaamu alaykum What do you say about people who claim that the Science of Hadith and the grading of narrators was invented too late, which means we cannot possibly know about the biographies and reliability of early narrators. What do you think about this?

@Haqeeqat

Жыл бұрын

Bogus claim

@huzaifahali412

Ай бұрын

​@Haqeeqat it takes ages....we await eagerly sir. Love you. Jazakallaah

@huzaifahali412

Ай бұрын

​@@HaqeeqatI request you to please explain in detail. Jazakallaah

ماشاء الله تبارك الرحمن، أحسن الله إليك يا أخي، أبليت بلاءً حسنًا في تفنيد مزاعم "المقدمة" الذي لطالما مَقَتُّ فيديوهاته المليئة بالكذب على الاسلام!

w video brother. may allah reward you

Can you please make a video on qiraat in early manuscript and opinion of scholar on qiraat. It will be useful inshaallah 😇 Thanks

@Haqeeqat

2 жыл бұрын

You can see some of the examples of Qira'at in early manuscripts in this video for example: @ 25:10 : "فتبينوا" in manuscript Arabe 331 Filio 41 (verso) showing Qira'ah of Hafs 'An 'Asim, while "فتثبتوا" in manuscript DAM 01-29.1 Folio 29 (verso) showing Qira'ah of al-Kisai and Hamzah. And even The Sana'a Palimpsest in Maktabah al-Sahrqiyyah @ 55:25 is showing Qira'ah of Warsh 'An Nafi'. To find Qira'at for a particular verse you can go to Quranpedia. And for the opinions of scholars about the Qira'at, I have recommended a book @ 1:21:45. Perhaps, I will do a video about it as well later, but for now I have some other important projects that are coming so stay tuned. JazakAllahu Khairan

@subhankhan7514

2 жыл бұрын

@@Haqeeqat Jazakallahu khairan brother your channel will be famous soon inshallah I specially like the last and latest information you share in this video. Keep it up brother👍

Excellent!

Informative but overly aggressive, there is room for everyone to learn and share knowledge. Kudos to Almoqaddima for sharing your video and being open to criticism and to you for the effort in the video

I appreciate the deep scholarship. I know from experience how much time that takes. Careful though, pride is blind. I also know this from experience.

I really enjoy this field of study! I am currently studying Archaeology, however, it is mostly analysis of artefacts and geological aspects, with little to no focus on manuscripts and the likes of it. Should I switch to History instead?

@Haqeeqat

6 ай бұрын

If you can find courses on Codicology or Biocodicology as part of your studying Archaeology, then that would be great otherwise you can switch.

good video❤❤

MashAllah! very detailed I was getting waswas from shaytan about this manuscript but after watching i’m satisfied!

Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Great The great video. Sir how do you know all these? your talent is amazing. I just wish I knew any way of learning all about islimic history and all. This video deserves more views. Very informative.

A very informative video but you don't need to be insulting to Al Muqaddimah.

@magma9000

Жыл бұрын

Lol wtf al muqaddimah is atheist 🤣🤣🤣

@seekeroftruth5389

Жыл бұрын

He is a kafir

@TheReaper569

Жыл бұрын

@@magma9000 what the fuck

@94josema

Жыл бұрын

@@magma9000 What evidence do you have for that?

@ihtishamkhan3429

Жыл бұрын

@@magma9000 Still waiting for that evidence bro

Why this video not getting viral

Very good information about the palimpsest and Islamic history!

Why did you stop making more of these?

i have a question please ....is the same writer who wrote the upper and lower layer ?

@Haqeeqat

10 ай бұрын

No, the upper text is estimated to have been written 50 years after the lower text. The scribe(s) of the lower and upper text are different.

@wawariro2247

10 ай бұрын

@@Haqeeqat IS there any Book that shows the différence between the lower text and the othmanic quran verse by verse in arabic !? If yes send me a link or something i want to read it

@wawariro2247

10 ай бұрын

​@@Haqeeqat are you sure it's 50 years !? Bcs i Heard in video that there is a high probability that the same person who wrote the upper layer IS the same who wrote the lower layer ...and i Heard from another video that the Time between the two layers is short ...i hope you give the reference where you found that it's 50 years

@Haqeeqat

10 ай бұрын

I have already given references in the video from the works of Prof. François Déroche, Dr. Asma Hilali as well as Dr. Éléonore Cellard.

1:06:11 you said about al arzatul akhira the last revelaltion revealed to prophet Muhammad ﷺ in ramazan that was then recited to zaid ibn thabit Is there any source for it that has isnad going back to prophet or sahaba? Jazakallahu khairan

@Haqeeqat

6 ай бұрын

The two books I've recommended by Dr. Muhammad bin Abd al-Rahman Alttasan has detailed discussion on this topic with all the narrations and their isnad along with their authenticity.

this is golden

this is amazing work

@Haqeeqat

Жыл бұрын

Thanks :)

Taking into consideration all the internet sensationalism around the Qur'an, I thank God that we have objective Muslims who approach these issues correctly.

Asalam 3laikum RahmatAllahi ta 3la wa barakatu JazakAllah Khair for this well put together video, I had just watched Al Muqqadimah's video on this as I was interested in the implications of the sannaa manuscript. My Christian friend was trying to tell me that the Quran was "Cleaned up" by the Uthmani committee, a bit ridiculous but with my limited knowledge I wasnt able to adequately respond.

Good Brother

We cant say zaid ibn sabit the most knowledgeable but yes he he was Champion in that.

@Haqeeqat

9 ай бұрын

He was the most knowledgeable "in writing the text of Qur'an" as al-Dhahabi said: "زيدا كان يكتب الوحي لرسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فهو إمام في الرسم، وابن مسعود فإمام في الأداء" Zaid used to write the divine revelation for the Prophet of Allah - may the blessings of Allah be upon him - so, he is imam in rasm (text) and Ibn Mas'ud is imam of adā' (recitation). سير أعلام النبلاء ط الرسالة ، ج 1 ، ص 488 Dr. Ghānim Qaddūrī Hamad explains it further in his book: رسم المصحف: دراسة لغوية تاريخية ، ص 114

So we have a complete quran manuscript from the earlier? Iblis gives me waswasa with this topic please help me 😢

What I want to know is with all the archeological and scholarly research done, is Mecca or Petra the correct place of worship direction etc. 🤔🤔🤔🤔

@omarsalim9562

7 ай бұрын

hahah really

Marvelous analysis and research! Please do more videos! Jazakallah khayr! Allah reward you in this life and the next!

Please tell us about the Birmingham manuscripts of the Quran

The title of video "The sana'a palimpsest: between lies, imaginations, opinion and the truth".. However, in this video itself, the narrator uses hearsay (or hadith) to prove certain narrative. So, the complete title of this video should be "The sana'a palimpsest: between lies, imaginations, opinion, truth and hearsay".

@Haqeeqat

Ай бұрын

It's easy for someone who hasn't studied the science of hadith to call it "hearsay" (which is actually the antonym of the word "Sahih Hadith") But, take it from someone who has studied it that it's much more reliable than manuscripts, all the history you've been taught and all the news that you consume on a daily basis. Secondly, the hadith is quoted to provide Islamic narrative, where the people who first received the revelation are the ones describing how they received it. So, even if you don't want to take it as hadith per se, you can take it as documented history (still not hearsay).

I'll save this video, and i came to this video from Al-muqaddimah.

Thanks

This video should be called al muqaddimah but way longer

You said in surah tawbah that it's written in the lower layer (don't write bissmilah) isn't that a prove that the lower layer IS just educational !?

15:48 As far as I can tell, that is meant to be depicting Gabriel revealing the Qur'an to Prophet Muhammad. What do you mean "it's just a weird and creepy painting"? I also really dislike how you blurred the videos of Dr. Eleanore Cellard and Dr. Asma Hilali? Regardless of how you theologically understand veiling, it must always be the woman's choice. Both women clearly do not choose to veil themselves. Overall good video, you clearly have a depth of knowledge on the subject. As others have said, this could be better communicated in a discourse if you left out the snide personal attacks and grandstanding.

@LoudWaffle

Жыл бұрын

@@ShahidTheFuzzy Yes but it’s still depicting what it’s depicting, and I don’t see how being heterodox makes something weird and creepy. I especially wouldn’t want to hear something that biased from someone engaging in scholarship.

@dresdi

6 ай бұрын

he can blur them if he wants. not your problem @@LoudWaffle

@LoudWaffle

6 ай бұрын

@@dresdi Of course he can, I can't reach through the monitor and interact with his editing process. I'm just pointing out that it's disrespectful to the women.

@dresdi

6 ай бұрын

how is it disrespectful? he's not restricting their right to not wear the veil, he is choosing to edit the video for use in HIS VIDEO. if you think editing someone to blur their face is disrespectful you must be EXTREMELY sensitive. If someone chose to walk around naked in broad daylight, would the news report not blur their genitals out of respect? @@LoudWaffle

@LoudWaffle

6 ай бұрын

@@dresdi I find the comparison of genitals and womens' faces to be very revealing. I'll leave it at that.

May Allah protect us from them whom lie to destroy our eman , AMEEN!!!!!!!!

why did u put the pictures of DR hani u do not agree with him

I think arabs can read it wothout dots etc its easy even i could read some words without looking at the verses with dots etc but if i compared the pages from the manuscripts with the pages today with dots etc, i could read it actually ❤

My question is if all the original documents are readily available in Yemen including the microfilms and the photos why lock them up and not allow scholars to study them further objectively? Personally I dont trust memory works (recitations) as a source of scholarly work.

It is actually a good sign that people publish videos like this. Yes...its dogmatic, heavy handed and a tad abrasive but thats the wild and wackie world of scholarship....and Islam is a relative new-comer to the arena. The Holy Quran is in need of serious dissection in order to foster stronger belief in the core tenets of the faith and not some superstitious attachments to documents, manner of dress, dietary laws and economics. Like the examinations of the Christian and Judaic scriptures, scholarship will address the conclusions made by the Arab religious right over the centuries and will polish the impact of the Word of God for the guidance it is to a closer relationship with Him. FWIW.

Birmingham Quran is more older than this sana transcript and it shows no variation. At all.

@hummingbird6420

2 ай бұрын

@nisbutvr4504 yes same

Almuqadimah treat like orientalist while he claim muslim

Leave Syawish alone!

25:20 you show different writings with different pronunciations and called them all valid ( of course without any proof). My question is … which one is the one that is in the Quran that is in heaven?

@Haqeeqat

9 ай бұрын

I have given enough proof for all the different recitations accepted by the Muslims, and not just the ones shown @25:20, but you just don't seem to care. Secondly, the question you've asked is a very old question, it has already been answered more than 4 years ago by Abu Umar al-Bahith in his video: الرد على سؤال جريء: 546 هل لم يتغير أي حرف في القرآن؟ ج2 And much before him by Ali al-Qari in his book Mirqat al-Mafatih with evidence that all the seven Ahruf are written inside al-Lawh al-Mahfuz. And lastly, it would be better if you stick to the subject of the video as this is not the video explaining seven Ahruf and Qira'at in detail, as I have mentioned in the video.

@alqurantvchannel

7 ай бұрын

Language of Quraish...

@alqurantvchannel

7 ай бұрын

but it was permissible to use in different dialect from local ease.

@alqurantvchannel

7 ай бұрын

there is no space left for argue...when i will say the Quran was already compiled by Umar and Abu Bakr...it was already preserved and was safely kept by Hazrat Hafza and we have direct words of Allah...Uthman sent copies of it to different states after confirmation of each verse from Hufaz...so it must not be concern of our that anyone had just personal copy of Quran in Yamen whome Uthman couldn't reach.

القناة مشكوك فيها تتحدث عن العبودية في الإسلام بطريقة غريبة

As much as the content is good, the language used and how the author of this video addresses other KZread user is totally unacceptable and far from academic standards. Even if someone is in wrong or presents points which have no factual ground, there is no need to be rude and abusive. Good quality material, very poor - to say at least - presentation. This is not how a Muslim talks about his fellow brother.

@simosandboifan989

5 ай бұрын

al-Muqaddimah is a secularist, which puts him out of the fold of Islam as in Islam, Shariah is followed at all times. Also his doubt on the authenticity of the Quran is enough to takfir him.

Great effort and explanation , thoroughly researched , I watched the Al Muqdama video before yours long ago, completely biased and propaganda, being fake liberals and was waiting for something like this, you destroyed his video completely, but you sound very insultive, mocking over aggressive and direct , you don't have to be, , don't bring your emotions to videos rather keep it fully researched and share knowledge with respect

This copy is written by a child learning Quran

The Gospels are not different stories, they are different eyewitness accounts of the same event with minor (Not contradictory) variations we expect to see from different observers of the same event. All the so called contradictions in the Gospels is easily solvable and all the Gospels complement each other in such a way that they prove each other's authenticity.

@therealyoutubeguy

Ай бұрын

Tell that to Dan McClellan spitting on your shitty gospels. The contradictions that are found in the gospels are solved through sheer apologetics. Meaning, apologists come up with guesstimates to solve a certain case so that they can validate the belief of other Cringianity believers. This same accusation doesn't stand against Islam because we interpret the Quranic verses in light of the tradition, also known as the Hadith. You, on the other hand interpret your verses in light of later doctrines, which begs the question whether the interpretations of your books are accurate in the first place (Hence why scholars differ on so many verses, and don't settle upon on one understanding). The Bible is a joke, it contains individually written books which Christians, being Christians are forced to believe are all univocal with each other, when they are not. Which is why Christians get room to fit the Trinity in. Here's a demonstration: Xtian: My Church says Jesus is God. Muslim: But Acts states that Jesus was a man through whom God did miracles, so how can he be God? Xtian: NO! But revelations states that Jesus is the Alpha and the Omega, the first and last! Which means he's both God and man, this is evidence for the Trinity! Nah. It's just one author speaking from one individual perspective while also using traditional understandings here and there.

the difference between a scholar and a student of knowledge...Al muqadimah got owned

Republish with title like: Why almuqqadimah, exmuslims, apologists are lying/wrong about the first Quran

Quran is not God,s word.Quran words by Abdul Malik Bin Mervan his disciples words.

@Haqeeqat

2 ай бұрын

Nice way to comfort yourself, but factually inaccurate statement.

There is no original Quran.Thou shalt not lie

@Haqeeqat

2 ай бұрын

@user-ut3tt8ew8m The term "original" is irrelevant for the Qur'an because it implies that there was something from which copies were made. But that's not the case for the Qur'an because it is the verbatim word of God, orally transmitted to us exactly as it was revealed. So, the proper term is "preserved" or "unchanged." The Qur'an with all its readings/recitations is preserved and unchanged word for word, letter for letter. The minute scribal mistakes in some manuscripts doesn't mean anything, as none of them is supported by data. However, you can say that we don't have the original Torah, or Bible, for that matter. For example, the oldest manuscript of the New Testament is the size of a credit card and was written in the 2nd century CE by an anonymous author. Also, the Bible is not preserved by any means. It is changed upside down and inside out. All of what is stated above is the truth, backed up by evidence, and not a lie.

A script written over another script is being given authentication. It was an abandoned manuscript and to draw too many conclusions from it is fallacy at best.

@Haqeeqat

3 ай бұрын

That's correct and that's why I gave the analogy of a gamer's channel, however, some "Muslim Researchers" on YT are so much indulged in the works of orientalists whose sole purpose is to spread doubts among the Muslims. That's why I had to make this video response and cover the topic from all aspects.