Ich liebe den panzer t 80

Забавно, старый Т80 даже первых модификаций куда лучше американскогт М1 Абрамс или Немецкого Позорища "Леопард"

The first serial produced tank with turbine engine was the S-Tank from Sweden not the T80 third is the Abrams.

@leongoch6748

10 ай бұрын

nope 1 year after the t 80

@korana6308

8 ай бұрын

Stridsvagn 103 is not a tank. That's the whole problem. It doesn't have a turret, it's a movable non rotating cannon. And it wasn't developed with a gas turbine engine in mind, it was retrofitted with after the initial production series, because they needed a more powerful engine. While the T80 was developed with a gas turbine engine in mind, and it was an actual tank and an MBT. There are only two tanks in the world with that engine: 1) T80, 2) Abrams.

@akitsujimura526

6 ай бұрын

@@korana6308 The Stridsvagn 103 is a tank. Just because it doesn't have a turret, does not mean it isn't a tank. Stridsvagn is quite literally the translation for "tank" in Swedish (chariot + tank). However you want to put it, the Strv 103A was the first tank to use a gas turbine, hands down. It doesn't matter if it wasn't going to use a turbine or not, as it still ended up using a turbine. Even if it uses a dual diesel + turbine powertrain, it still used a gas turbine, and is as such, the first tank to use a gas turbine.

@akitsujimura526

6 ай бұрын

@@leongoch6748 1967 for the Strv 103 vs 1976 for the T-80. the Strv103 was the first production tank to use a gas turbine.

@korana6308

6 ай бұрын

@@akitsujimura526 first off where are you from? because I am interested in different Indo European languages, and I know exactly what it translates to and even more. "Vagn" does not translate as a "tank" those are two completely different words. It is NOT a tank, for it to be classified as a modern tank, it has to have a turret. as simple as that. Every single tank has had a turret. Even 0 gen Mk1 tank had a rotating turret, just not on top of the tank. And the actual first gen tank FT 17 and every tank after that had always had a turret, moreover every single future tank will also have a turret - Altay, T14, K2, Arjun, next gen Abrams, MGCS etc etc they all have and will have a turret in the future. So it's an intrinsic characteristic of every single tank. you can't just remove a turret and call it a tank. It's simply becomes a movable cannon. Or at least not a proper tank. That is obvious to anyone who knows anything about tanks.

вы наслаждаетесь прыжком, а я выносливостью подвески после приземления 😅

The Russian language gives me chills it’s so beautiful

@acedynamo

Жыл бұрын

It's a hidious language, so ugly sounding and gutteral.

@mikecimerian6913

Жыл бұрын

@@acedynamo Beats your grunting.

@anon457

Жыл бұрын

@acedynamo I agree, definitely one of the ugliest languages in the world. Even when a girl speaks it still comes off as ugly.

@lexburen5932

Жыл бұрын

@@acedynamo no yankee anglo saxon lanquage is nice lol. Russian sounds much more elegant and chique

@gregmesemondo1401

10 ай бұрын

Great! Why don’t you move to Moscow

Beautiful tank🇷🇺❤️

👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

The most producted MBT T-80 BV and T-80 U what is in Meat-Grinder today in Ukraine is used in this time and is recieved a bran new FaceLift...♥️👏👏🇷🇺🤙🤙🙂

Amazing....

Sorry turbines in tanks? Another German first. Germans did it with one of the Panther tanks. Brits were second.

@sam8404

Жыл бұрын

Eh sort of. Panther with a turbine engine was considered but never actually put into production or service.

@a.m.armstrong8354

Жыл бұрын

Dan. We're talking about active service..OK?!

@dhooter

Жыл бұрын

@a.m.armstrong8354 ?? It was a documentary that described the "History" of the T-80, and yes active T-80's as well.

@a.m.armstrong8354

Жыл бұрын

@@dhooter Youre a prick. You begin by saying it was a German first..while admitting it was just ONE tank..therefore NO active service. That means the Germans couldn't make their lone Panther as unfeasible as the Tiger and Panthers they managed to produce. You then go on to remind yourself we are talking about T80's, which ARE active service. Brits never managed active service with their efforts either. What gives with you NATO fanboys?! NATO tanks sucked until the mid eighties, with the exception of the Centurion. Russian tanks repeatedly were outgunning and out manoeuvring Western tanks, with better protection. We weren't told about T80's in the 80's. We weren't told Russians were a generation ahead of us regarding gucci armour, laminates, ballistic computation; and we're only now introducing a smoothbore onto the Chally, which is why Ukraine is getting the scrubs that aren't spares or covered by the Rheinmetall contract. NATO always was a paper tiger, which only bared its teeth once Gorbachev sold out the USSR. Now Russians have returned in force, where is NATO? Skulking behind the Ukrainians NATO trained to hide behind schools, hospitals and municipal buildings, same way NATO trained ISIS. Get somewhere.

@dhooter

Жыл бұрын

@@a.m.armstrong8354 Tldr

In Desert Storm the turrets popped right of curiosity of the M1 Abrams 🇺🇸'S Main Battle Tank [[[[HOO-AHH]]]

@user-kw6ox2sv3p

2 жыл бұрын

Only when iraqis crew were sleeping at night,what happened once or twice.Pentagon don't want to show other cases from 1991,but we have satellite images of tank battles...

@SHOT_GUNNER

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-kw6ox2sv3p you will have many satellite images of Russian Tanks that have been destroyed in Ukraine. Many of them… The Russian army is a Joke. 😎✌🏻🤡

@user-kw6ox2sv3p

2 жыл бұрын

@@SHOT_GUNNER Your dead and fleeing from Ukraine mercenaries not agreed with you.

@sam8404

Жыл бұрын

You sure you're not thinking of the Iraqi T-72's? Abrams experienced extremely low losses during Desert Storm (like only one or two digits, and none due to enemy fire).

@lexburen5932

Жыл бұрын

you dont wanna know what happened with sherman tanks in the second world war. The germans called them " turret poppers "

Good old soviet propaganda 😂😂😂

@blackowl9417

2 жыл бұрын

Это не советская пропоганда , это новый русский документалтный фильм , если я не ошебаюсь.

@SHOT_GUNNER

2 жыл бұрын

@@blackowl9417 you missed the joke. Since many of these are easily destroyed in seconds by our Saint In Savior … Saint Javelin! 😂

@ronchum5178

2 жыл бұрын

@@SHOT_GUNNER Too bad it's a bulky and finnicky system. Not to mention the ones being sent over are older. So they are generally unreliable, and there really aren't enough of them being sent to make a difference. Oh yeah, and most of them were kalibrated in storage before they got a chance to show up on the field 🤣

@lexburen5932

Жыл бұрын

haha. The fact is that this tank could destroy any western tank in the cold war. I know its difficult to admit because you are brainwashed by western mainstream media propaganda. Russian federation has still over 10k of these tanks modernized into T80 BVM they serve in the arctic.

@a.m.armstrong8354

Жыл бұрын

@@SHOT_GUNNER Javelins are pish. They don't work and only expose users to retaliatory fire or drone strikes. You were fed a load of photoshopped bollocks designed to puff up Ukrainian successes. Meanwhile Ukraine lost all its tanks, all former Warsaw Pact donated tanks, and now begs for NATO crumbs which will be swept away despite the other guy not using Javelins. If you're a 'detective' you're pretty defective, because your analysis is ineffective, hence my corrective..

Seems that Russian T-80’s are crematoriums for Russian tankers in Ukraine. Jack-in-the-Box. До свидания, comrade!

@a.m.armstrong8354

Жыл бұрын

Against artillery and top-attack munitions, every tank is a potential grave; which is why no NATO tank maker wants their current MBT mods anywhere near Ukraine.

@VASYA_V0R0N

11 ай бұрын

according to the latest news, it turns out that ukrainian tank crew burn better and in larger quantities than Russians...

@AngryBird000

11 ай бұрын

@@a.m.armstrong8354 lol what's next smoking outdated Abrams to beds 💀

@LeMeowAu

10 ай бұрын

tbf they are being knocked out for the same reason any western tanks would, precision artillery and man portable advanced anti-armour systems supplied by the west, currently the issue is the lack of suitable active protection systems on their tanks, currently only certain t-90s have soft-kill, however it is archaic and requires the turret to face the threat, and even then it is only against older munitions. also ukraine is using the same T tank series so kind of a double jab, which is fine as the tank should be replaced

😂🤣😂🤣Ukraina have many russki wrack's this tank 😂🤣😂🤣😂

@blackowl9417

2 жыл бұрын

Заебали с украиной

@user-kw6ox2sv3p

2 жыл бұрын

Continue dreaming...

@SHOT_GUNNER

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-kw6ox2sv3p Ivan, you are the only one who is living in a dream … Ruski Mir! It’s a bad dream. 🤡

@user-kw6ox2sv3p

2 жыл бұрын

@@SHOT_GUNNER For you may be,but we don't care,it is our world

@user-xr8md2ys9m

2 жыл бұрын

@@SHOT_GUNNER pidar gey