Romance novelist Nancy Brophy murder trial, Day 14, afternoon session | Live Stream
The murder trial of romance novelist Nancy Crampton Brophy resumes Wednesday afternoon, May 4, 2022, with Crampton Brophy's defense team calling more witnesses. Crampton Brophy was arrested in September 2018 in the shooting death of her husband Daniel Brophy.
Daniel Brophy, 63, was killed as he prepped for work at the Oregon Culinary Institute in Southwest Portland on June 2, 2018.
More coverage of the Nancy Brophy trial: www.kgw.com/article/news/crim...
Subscribe: / kgwnews8
Watch the latest KGW newscast: www.kgw.com/watch
Get the KGW app: kgw.com/appredirect
Пікірлер: 82
Defense put on some GREAT prosecution witnesses!
@StellaFl
2 жыл бұрын
LOL, this gets Best Comment Award :D
@brittanyturner5148
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly my thought!
So if I'm getting this right, defense theory...a person without a house came into the school, shot Chef Brophy, TWICE, stole a waffle iron and climbed up onto the roof?
@christallh24
5 ай бұрын
Not just *a* man, but a scary, homeless *black* man! A *homeless* black man that was rummaging through garbage bins all the while having access to a gun worth over a $1,000 after having committed murder!
What kind of court proceedings are these where the defense lawyers are so casual, making statements like I know how much you like him and many statements citing personal views…kangaroo court, also witness box a couple feet from defendant…crazy.
@GH-oi2jf
2 жыл бұрын
The lawyers may make such statements if they wish. The court has nothing to do with it. It is not a “kangaroo court.” You must not know what the term means.
Defense is grasping at straws. She murdered a beautiful soul for greed
So the Defense is insinuating that a homeless shot Dan, didn't take anything and then rummaged around in bins while the crime scene swarmed with cops. Clutching at straws!!!
That woman police officer defense called was FANTASTIC! What a pleasure to have someone so professional, precise, and articulate. She did a great job for the prosecution. That lovely woman who's a chef instructor at Lincoln. What a gem. Her students are so lucky to have someone with such a big heart. I'll bet there was only one person in the room unmoved by her testimonial and memories of Dan, the one sitting in the defense box. Great witness for the prosecution. But disgusting that defense wanted to ask a sex question in the middle of all that sorrow. I didn't even understand the question; it was just all innuendo, but totally out of place. Does anyone know what that question actually was?
@saharaussery6799
2 жыл бұрын
I don't know what specific sex act the defense lawyer was hinting about...but that whole topic backfired on her...the witness said whatever it was, it was said in a joking manner and in a situation that made me think of how things get said in a "locker room" atmosphere between the guys...but, of course locker room talk is notoriously exaggerated/lies...so she embarrassed the witness and got information that did not help
@StellaFl
2 жыл бұрын
Maybe Maxwell hinted at it to demonstrate how close the lady chef and Dan were so they can claim that if there were marital issues, the lady chef would know?
@saharaussery6799
2 жыл бұрын
@@StellaFl that would still be a big backfire because she also stated that it was a professional relationship only...which is why she only heard joking comments made among "the guys" while in a public setting. I mean...the defense has to say SOMEthing...so l guess they are desparately grabbing straws. I bet you they totally avoid the topic of her car on all those videos...after all, "should l believe your 'explanation' or my lying eyes?"
@JustMe-px9qy
10 ай бұрын
@@saharaussery6799- the thought of anything like that with Nancy is nauseating
Im SO glad they moved the camera set up!!
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
Yeeah, way better, but now we keep seeing the back of the prosecutor's head! And you can look at the laptop screens of the prosecution team.
The victims friend, her speaking about him just broke my heart! THAT is how one should speak of a loved one that was murdered! His friend is more emotional (not even in just crying, but emotional as far as how she feels about him), said far more heartfelt things. Yes, people grieve differently, but you can’t watch this awful lady(his wife) and say she’s not fishy in all of her behavior.
The young woman who was close to Dan wouldn’t look at Nancy on the stand or when she stepped down to leave. I have a feeling she made a better prosecution witness.
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
She was supposed to be Nancy’s witness, too.
@tinyraymond
2 жыл бұрын
I suspect it was Nancy that told her attorneys there was something going on between Dan and his lovely friend, I bet they're regretting it now! The more I learn about Dan, the angrier I get.
So..... an armed homeless person breaks in, executes Dan and leaves without taking a single thing. mmmmmkkkk :/
@nancyvega1785
2 жыл бұрын
…while someone who took out of life insurance on him, and was near the scene of the crime in her van, bought an addition to a gun, in order to what? writes about murdering a husband and claims innocence. Very interesting 🤔,
@snarkmark
Жыл бұрын
Don't forget the waffle iron! He took that gigantic commercial waffle iron..
Try as they may, defense just can’t get no satisfaction
These defense witnesses are clueless except for the police lady. What an embarrassment they have been-and a waste of the court’s time.
@GH-oi2jf
2 жыл бұрын
The defense does not have much to work with, but they are entitled to bring witnesses.
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
The woman cop was spectacular. Very impressive.
How is Nancy Brophy able to afford this defense? Two attorneys in court plus the cost of these expensive witnesses.
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
I'm thinking her family? Evidently, every single one of her siblings is an attorney. There are no family supporters in attendance.
@starrlove2060
2 жыл бұрын
See had money from the sale of the house plus 2 small ins payouts the money n ins from the school and had receive 2 payments from the big ins but it stoped the day of her arrest
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
Good point about the house sale. She didn’t have hardly anything in her accounts, though, when she went to jail. She spent it all. For one thing, she spent big $$$ on the yard. I wonder if the money from the house is not available because it was ill-gotten gains? This defense must cost several hundred k.
@trucrimeonmytime6288
2 жыл бұрын
@@sleuththewild I am guessing the defense costs are in the millions. They are working hard at proving she did not do it, very detail orientated attorneys. I think she is going to prison!
@barbaragrove6097
2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if she got something from her brother's estate
I don't see the purpose of the defense calling the BMW guys, they had absolutely nothing to contribute to the case.
LOL defense didn't prepare their next witness, so court had to end early. The judge is NOT happy.
@NellPlotts
2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if the defense prepared any of the witnesses. The most professional was the forensic accountant but I still didn’t see how her conclusions helped the defense. The retired professor was a waste of defense resources. The police officers didn’t help the defense. My granddaughter will attend Lincoln in a couple of years, a straight A student who loves to cook. I hope she has time in her schedule to take the culinary class taught by that witness.
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
@@NellPlotts That teacher witness was so special. And great for the prosecution.
That's fine the female prosecuting attorney's voice and her saying um all the time extremely annoying she asked questions that are unnecessary because they have been explained by the witness when the defense is questioning the witness
@debidriscoll8108
Жыл бұрын
I also can't stand that they are allowing witnesses to use the word aha yep Etc, that is not Courthouse demeanor in speech
them defense lawyers are disgusting, sneezing loudly in the court room how un professional..
Wow there happened to be a black homeless man at a recycling bin he must be the one who shot Dan. Come on defense you can't do better than that????
I see a guilty decree coming for this witless author
@tbull7879
2 жыл бұрын
I second that
@debidriscoll8108
Жыл бұрын
She can write a book on jail house living
The hypocrisy from the defense is hilarious. "Maybe it was a homeless person! You know you can't trust the homeless!" "But believe this one thing this one homeless guy supposedly said."
1:38:35 A little shook listening to this man say that 1988 was 37 years ago... dude making me feel several years older than I am. 😆
It’s mind-boggling how many leading and/or compound questions during direct examination are permitted without any objection. This occurred during the state’s case as well but I had attributed this to the incompetence of defense counsel. Truthfully I had been looking forward to seeing the prosecutors preventing defense counsel from asking similarly objectionable questions so it’s a bit disappointing.
I can’t imagine the horror of being romantic with Nancy. She’s so cold and mean spirited. 🤮
I think “The Hammer” was putting nails in Nancy’s coffin.
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
Yep! Why on earth did defense call her? In a week when Dan is out of the picture because we’ve had BMW mechanics, landscapers, beancounters, and scruffy professors, the chef brought the lovely Dan front and center again, and it was heartbreaking.
@CaraMills0106
2 жыл бұрын
Nancy put the nails in her own coffin in about 30 minutes from talking to the police. She lied saying she was home in bed, and videos from parking garage showed her in her car in the same area as the culinary school. Then with the last swing on the coffins, she calls the lead detective and lies about the life insurance amount and there were 8 life policies. She wanted a note to the insurance agent from detective saying she was not a suspect so they would release the insurance check to her.
@StellaFl
2 жыл бұрын
@@sleuththewild I think she was called to testify as a very close friend of Dan's and tell the jury their marriage was great. And you're right, she did bring him front and centre again.
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
IMO defense should stay away from this argument. Every time a witness says their (sham) marriage was great, it enhances Nancy’s treachery. Heinous.
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
Great wording!
The lawyers for the state and the defense are so professional and respectful, what a great opportunity to see the legal process work. The defense attorneys were intent on providing the very best defense possible within the limits of legal ethics, Nancy was well defended, although highly circumstantial it was beyond a shadow of a doubt she was guilty, I do not if Oregon has the death sentence but if they do she was lucky to only receive a life sentence ( given her age). So cold blooded.
Prosecution should have brought a witness to say whether or not Nancy could sell the house after Dan's death since she wasn't on the mortgage.
What a waste of this lady officers time. Does the defense seriously believe that someone walked in, shot Dan then climbed through the ceiling to the roof to escape instead of gong right back out the nearest door? LOL, LOL, LOL
Does anyone recall how much life insurance Nancy had on herself?
@starrlove2060
2 жыл бұрын
Just 25 000
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
Really? Gosh!
@StellaFl
2 жыл бұрын
@@starrlove2060 Thank you, I remembered it was something ridiculously small.
When my husband and I bought a house it was through the VA, I wasn't allowed on the mortgage but I was on the deed
Is Brophy still taking the stand?
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
She might not have anything to lose, at this point.
@trishbrennan9452
2 жыл бұрын
She’d better take some acting lessons if she does
@saharaussery6799
2 жыл бұрын
She still thinks she's the smartest person in the room...she wouldn't miss her chance for an audience to hear her "story." Too bad for her, she will find out that many people are smarter than her.
Does anyone know if the house was foreclosed or if Dan had death insurance on the mortgage.
@maryb6672
11 ай бұрын
The house was sold
I will say it again. The female prosecutor--I am not a biologist, mind you--is TERRIBLE as a trial lawyer. Diction and delivery is unacceptable. She fails to understand the basics of scientific or mathematically based testimony. What a waste of the court’s time.
@stankyb1
Жыл бұрын
Yeah, she was very unprofessional in her questioning.
This man is so right, we stole the land from the indians
The defense has called some great witnesses they really know their stuff
@sleuththewild
2 жыл бұрын
Certainly, they've put on some FANTASTIC witnesses for the prosecution.