Watch the video in x2 speed. Thank me later.

@jacksonjanis5460

Жыл бұрын

1.5x is better

@r_dubs90

Жыл бұрын

I did 1.5x

@jd8169

2 ай бұрын

1.25 is the sweet spot

I have both. I have a two tone Explorer and a silver dial OP. I couldn’t decide which one to get so I got both. The OP is my everyday piece. Silver pretty much goes with anything. I see the Explorer as a sporty yet classy timepiece. The OP as classy yet sporty timepiece. I’m also a sucker for symmetry so this is why I have time only watches.

I found the sunburst dial is what attracted me to buy the OP36 instead of the Explorer I. Certainly a lot of variations and funs to see under light.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

That's true, but the minimalist look of the Explorer dial has its own merits.

@romeos50

2 жыл бұрын

The OP is has the minimalist look of the 2.

I own and love the Explorer, I would still love the Perpetual as well. If I had to choose,I would stay with the Explorer.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Agree! Explorer is preferable, but OP is nice to have, too

Lovely pieces!❤

David S - I agree neither strike me as being in the dress watch category.

Nice review. There are many subtle differences that you pointed out. I prefer the explorer as well.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching!

That's an incredible comparison! And a brave one, because it's generally considered sacrilege to say the Explorer looks anything less than perfect in every respect. Although I love my Explorer II (same vintage as your Explorer, same bracelet, and black dial), which is my only Rolex, if I had to get by on only one watch it would probably be the OP, or maybe Datejust. Neither, however, are proper 'dress watches', at least not in my book.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Sometimes the Explorer gets into a cult status with some people, so I need to remind myself to be realistic about it. I still like the Explorer better than the OP, but its not perfect, and would still want other options to wear. Datejust is my most dressiest watch, but I'm just saying in relative terms. I don't have occasions to wear anything more formal.

I love that black OP!

I would love to see it on your wrist from different distances and different angles. Everything looks like a good size at such a close up. But overall I like the video, great job, keep it up.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks, I’ll try to do that in future videos, but it’s hard to get the right angle. I just posted a new video today with some still pictures of the YM and GMT

Thanks

The Explorer wears so beautiful on your wrist.

I couldn't decide between the Explorer 36mm model and the OP 36 mm with the white Dial, so I ended up eventually getting both. They both are amazing watches, and you really can't go wrong with either. I got the white dial one since I didn't want 2 black dials because I would probably only wear the explorer if that were the case. If only they made a 36mm OP with the OP 39's face. That would be close to the perfect OP watch.

@sc1

3 жыл бұрын

That’s a good choice. I didn’t get the white dial OP just because I already had a white dial Datejust.

@Tom-ff8cv

Жыл бұрын

What do you end up using more?

@comeonman7423

6 ай бұрын

fantastic combination 👌🏽

Nice comparison!!

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

THANKS!

I’m waiting for my black OP36 from my AD, I compared it to the new Explorer 36 and I prefer the multi faceted batons on the OP36 over the Explorer 36. Also it’s 25% cheaper so that helps too

Thank you so much for making this video. Despite the inferior bracelet I think I prefer the Explorer. I value legibility and being lighter it might be more comfortable on the wrist for daily wear. And the iconic 3-6-9 design together with the mercedes hands spoke to me since the beginning.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

I feel the same way about the Explorer

I have a 1970 oyster precision 6426 which I bought in 1989,its hand wound and I think 34mm but wears bigger and is slightly thinner as it has a flat caseback, it has the same style bracelet as the explorer.this model was discontinued in 1990 but the old style air king precision is similar and continued well into the 2000s I think.

traded in my explorer 114270 for an OP 116000 with a white dial because I liked the little bit of extra beefiness, and felt like it was more historically true to the Everest climb.

@nathanf1934

4 жыл бұрын

NNNooooooo!

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

White dial looks nice too

@austinzizzi1142

3 жыл бұрын

Nathan F it was a white op that summited the top of Everest plus the 116000 is much more solidly built with better steel than the 114270 and a better bracelet and clasp (and case in my opinion). Also the white dial is much more beautiful and dynamic than the black gloss of the explorer

@comeonman7423

Жыл бұрын

The white dial OP is a beauty. I prefer it over the Explorer definitely

I have an Explorer 36mm, the 114270. It’s a great watch and the bracelet is fine for me, I like the lightness of the watch. The OP is nice but seems too similar to the Explorer. I realise you got the OP first but I would consider changing it for a white dial version if it was me.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

You’re probably right. If I could do it over again, I would probably get the Explorer 36mm first, then get the OP in a white dial. I really like that particular shade of white. But that’s just not how things worked out, and I don’t really want to be bothered with switching out my OP right now. I ended up getting the OP black dial first because I thought it could take the place of an Explorer too.

You should do a top 3 or top 5 watches ranked. Great comparison.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Good idea, think I’ll do that after I’ve had some more time with my watches. I do have a video on my Rolex Collection Summary posted already.

@sc1

3 жыл бұрын

Sam & Marielle I took your advice and did a top 5 video

Great video. Did you consider the Explorer I 14270 as well? If so, what was your thinking there in choosing 114270? Also, is it possible to fit the OP36's bracelet on the explorer?

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, I thought about the 14270, but the 114270 has sold end links and it is newer so it’s likely to be in better condition. I haven’t tried to switch the bracelets but I suppose the OP bracelet would probably fit on it.

Thank you for that amazing video

@sc1

2 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for subscribing

Are the bracelets interchangeable? Id like to use the more modern op bracelet on the explorer.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

no, they are not. someone else commented that the lug holes are not in the same position.

Explorer for me

The OP 116000 is amazing. Better than the new one

I had the 36mm op in blue with the 3,6,9 dial, I really liked the watch and I got it as it was the closest thing to a modern 36mm explorer. Anyway, I sold it after a year as I kept going back to the 36mm explorer, I don't think there is any substitute for that watch unless Rolex make a new version in 36mm. I think it is close to perfection for a watch.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

I did something similar. I got the OP 36mm with black dial first because it was the closest thing to an Explorer 36mm and I did not want to risk buying a used Explorer. After a few months, I still wanted the Explorer because of the dial and lugs, and luckily found one in good condition. OP couldn’t replace a true Explorer for me.

@coffeeboyclips1973

4 жыл бұрын

@@sc1 agree, op is a nice watch but it's no explorer, i also felt it was a bit on the dressy side and I didn't like the hands. I've been looking at some 16200 datejust, what's your opinion on them.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Coffee BOY CLIPS I have a 16200 with white dial but don’t wear it much anymore. It was my only watch for a few years but looks plain now. I like the new datejust because of the new movement, bracelet, and the lugs came back down to size. I’m looking at a 126234 with a silver dial

@coffeeboyclips1973

4 жыл бұрын

@@sc1 thank you, I'm thinking of buying another Rolex after selling my OP, just don't know what to get, so much choice and variety, I'm wearing a Hamilton khaki 38mm as a stop gap and it's quite a nice watch.

@Jay-xr3sb

4 жыл бұрын

@@coffeeboyclips1973 omega aqua terra 38.5mm. 8500

Would you consider doing outdoor activities in the op? Such as hiking, skiing etc? Looking to get one myself. :)

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Definitely yes, OP is very sturdy and can handle it.

@ingot_buddy

4 жыл бұрын

@@sc1 thanks for the feedback, really appreciate it :)

This video is exactly what I want. I made my mind with explorer.

@sc1

3 жыл бұрын

Good choice!

I’m in a similar situation. Bought a new 36mm Datejust black dial in 2017 and in 2019 a 36mm Explorer. There is something about the 36mm Explorer... Changed the oyster bracelet on the Datejust for the superjubilee which makes it feel more different and dressy now. Have you tried the bracelet of the OP on the Explorer? Might be a great solution.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

I thought about it, but decided against mixing up the bracelets. I would rather keep the originals where they came from.

@mazrashid6549

4 жыл бұрын

I'm in a very similar situation to yourself. I purchased my first "luxury" watch in 2019 for my 30th. It was a toss up between a Datejust or an Explorer. I opted for the new Datejust 36mm 126234 black dial fluted bezel and jubilee bracelet. Absolutely beautiful watch, amazing build quality and all the benefits of buying brand new (warranty etc). The fact that I was able to get a considerable discount through a friend on a brand new Rolex sealed the deal! My conundrum with the Explorer was that my preference for my first watch was brand new. The build quality on the new 39mm were obviously fantastic but the proportions were all wrong to my eye. I tried on a 36mm 114270 the same day and although I preferred it to the 39mm I was shocked at the difference in build quality which put me off. Even the Seiko Sarb 033 I was wearing at the time felt superior. I honestly have no regrets about my Datejust however something about the 36mm explorer keeps drawing me back. I'm still tempted, but would it be silly to have two 36mm Rolex with black dials? Would it be to similar? Also I have a the Seiko Sarb 033 (my first ever mechanical each l watch) which kind of fills the role of an explorer making it even harder to justify.

@nlslmmns

4 жыл бұрын

@@mazrashid6549 Believe me, two very different watches. I'm very sure these will be a good duo, strong on their own.

@mazrashid6549

4 жыл бұрын

@@nlslmmns hmm, maybe your right. I keep looking at the similarities (stainless steel, black dial and 36mm). But they're also very different. The Datejust has a jubilee bracelet, fluted bezel and the Cyclops. All this makes it quite dressy and even a little blingy. The Explorer is more casual with the Oyster bracelet, smooth bracelet and no date function. My worry is that the obvious similarities would mean that the two watches cover too much of the same ground. But maybe another way of looking at things is that they compliment each other, like brother's that bear a resemblance but with very different personalities?

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

@@mazrashid6549 That Datejust black dial/ fluted bezel/ jubilee is beautiful. Very premium looking, but very formal. The Explorer 36mm is a much more understated and low key and can be worn as a casual sports watch. I think it's fine to have both. I didn't like the thought of the inferior bracelet at first, but I got over it. It's just different, it has some character, and just goes with the territory and belongs on that watch. Explorer 39 case and dial are too big.

For me the Explorer is just more interesting and cool, but I do like the OP as well.

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah I agree

What would be the price difference between these two watches be about?

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

Oyster Perpetual 36mm is $5400 retail + tax. I got my Explorer for $5165 pre-owned, but prices vary depending on year and condition.

Well great, that didn't help at all. I still like them both! My only true take away is that 36 mm this is way way too small for me

@sc1

2 ай бұрын

I feel it. They are both great. For my tiny wrist, 36 is the best size.

An Oyster Perpetual went to the top of Everest, not the Explorer.

The superiority of the OP finish is very obvious. If you're a thinking man, you'll buy the OP because its a new 2018 release, cheaper, Rolex warranty, it wears a gold crown vs Explorer's tiny painted crown. The Explorer is none of those, however, the Explorer has better looking dial that everyone loves and that's it. And by the way, what's the history behind the Explorer that you like?

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

The Explorer Dial and slim lugs put it over the top for me, despite the advantages of the OP that you mentioned.

I am probably on the market for a Rolex. I have currently a tudor sub 79090. I'm thinking about Explorer but could end up at even a no date sub. Any recommendations for the first Rolex?

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

I think the 2 subs would too similar. My first Rolex was a DateJust, and I think that's still a good option, if you are ok with a dress watch. If you want something more casual, an Explorer or Oyster Perpetual would be very nice.

Wow . I am just looking at my Seiko sarbo33 now. Not much difference at all . Still I would love a Rolex . Maybe one day .

The biggest difference is that the OP36 can’t climb mountains. The Explorer has been modified to handle the high altitude and cold weather. It’s a more robust watch, modified to take the extreme stress of mountain climbing

I tried both as i want to buy one of them. But i have a question. Both are 36mm but the Explorer looked a bit smaller than the OP. did anyone notice the same thing? If yes any explication?

@sc1

8 ай бұрын

I believe that is true. The case diameter of the current Explorer is slightly smaller, but the bracelet width is also smaller than the OP36

@T3720

8 ай бұрын

Thanks for the reply. Regarding the clasp, is the one on the OP safe, because the Exp has a fold over clasp which makes it harder to be opened accidentally. I prefer the OP but this detail make me think about the EXP

Am I right in saying that the Explorer is actually a tribute to the Oyster Perpetual? If so, then how can you like the "history" etc to the tribute version, when OP is the real deal? Please someone, correct me if I am wrong here because I probably am!

@sc1

4 жыл бұрын

I’ll explain what I mean about “history” (though I may be incorrect, too!). I think the Explorer is more linked to Mt Everest than the Perpetual, just because of marketing/ advertising alone. Most people associate them together, even though it may not be technically correct, and in fact, Tenzing Norway wore the Perpetual. Also, The Explorer was worn by Ian Fleming (pictures to show it), and it can be assumed that this was the watch he intended for the literary James Bond to wear (actual model was not specified in the novels), although the cinematic James Bond wore the Submariner (because the director wore one).

@djorgen

4 жыл бұрын

The OP is the one that was on Mt. Everest so if you go by that legacy alone the OP is the one to go for, not the Explorer. :-)

@romeos50

4 жыл бұрын

@@djorgen Absolutely! The Explorer is a commemorative watch and the first watch to wear the borrowed Mercedes hand.

@romeos50

4 жыл бұрын

@@sc1 Ian Fleming wants James Bond to wear an Explorer? Right, the Explorer is all fiction then, a wannabe James Bond and Everest watch. Changed my mind in buying an Explorer. Nah!

no comparision