The hair for low graphics has a life of it's own.

@tivus

8 жыл бұрын

+Louis Ayers tru dat

If you look very closely you can tell It's not Angelina Jolie

@rd6547

8 жыл бұрын

+ZeqHD True

@M1710

8 жыл бұрын

+ZeqHD I for one do not miss the look of old Lara or Angelina looking Lara.

@ibrahimcowke

7 жыл бұрын

Lara is not angelina

@thedevilhimself6557

6 жыл бұрын

Angelina was a mistake. That bitch facial features don't even match Lara.

@emperor719

5 жыл бұрын

hey wi have a simillar profile picture

lol! Min settings = Fallout 4 Max settings! Wtf!

@eminem581525

8 жыл бұрын

LOL

@deetsitmeisterjd

8 жыл бұрын

The low settings look fucking dogshit.

@hieuddo5752

8 жыл бұрын

+deetsitmeisterjd totally agree, it looks like different characters/game

@alphaboxler

8 жыл бұрын

+MateusRPhaw ++++

@Matix20122001

8 жыл бұрын

lol

It looks awesome even on medium settings

@LordGronkel

7 жыл бұрын

yes yes good optimized game. i have a gtx 950 and play med setting 1080p very good experience :) later buy strongest card and play again maxed settings :)

@gamingenthusiast710

3 жыл бұрын

Even on low.....btw its the very low settings where you can see a huge difference...

@sahibpreetsingh5514

3 жыл бұрын

@@gamingenthusiast710 yes..but to get a balanced performance and graphics..medium is the best option imo.

Is it just me, or do minimal graphics settings make the game look scary?

@Mrpotatoes617

4 жыл бұрын

ok i guess im going to play it scary cuz my pc is a potato

You need to keep in mind: Besides the "lowest/minimum" settings, there are still "low" settings, before you get to "medium" settings. And "low" settings already look way better than "lowest/minimum".

when i'm playing this game with purehair off, Lara's hair won't stop moving even tho there's no air or wind XD

Is it just me or does anyone feel no difference between medium and high/ultra?

@gguy3600

4 жыл бұрын

You can't see it in this video, but sometimes there's a little number in the corner. That's where the difference lies.

@ronipletikosa

4 жыл бұрын

yeah um im wondering what on earth the difference is with dynamic foliage?

@gguy3600

4 жыл бұрын

@@ronipletikosa I don't think it's nessissarily a graphical feture. Judging from the description in the menu: I think it's just meant to displace plants more when you move through them so it's less obvious you're just clipping through them. I've never really noticed much of a difference though.

High/Very High don't seem to differ much

@Eihei

8 жыл бұрын

+queenform Like in almost every game recently. For example in Witcher 3 the only difference between those was the draw distance.

@yune____

8 жыл бұрын

+Ryuhoshi also the shadow render distance

@BoilingHotCoffee

8 жыл бұрын

+queenform but if you can run those settings at 60fps+, then run those settings max by all means!

@SamKIA

5 жыл бұрын

the shadows and AO are a noticeable difference but the difference between high and max for texture settings for instance is more of refining the details

Such a gorgeous game. Even in low settings.

@zainanderson8197

8 жыл бұрын

this game looks bad in low

@liudaspocius8874

8 жыл бұрын

+Shanthini Mahendran yeah low is sh*t medium is way better

@JoelDesouzartAhhhhhh

8 жыл бұрын

+Caroline Pennington Yeah, very ugly!! -__-

@harpskid

8 жыл бұрын

+Shanthini Mahendran What is with people? I agree with you, low looks great, but medium and higher look significantly better. Look back 4 years ago, we would have found low on this gaming stunning!

@leoblack8497

7 жыл бұрын

such a gorgeous girl even with headphones , yep im that guy

the reason why the lowest setting looks so bad is because there are no shadows then, put the game on lowest setting with shadows turned on and the game will actually look already amazing

@hasinaacter4686

2 жыл бұрын

Yep that's how I play on my potato pc

Glad to see that there is such a big difference!

That vignette blur may be a minor detail but it makes a hell of a difference, the overall image looks far more pleasing with it on.

Thank you, exactly what i wanted to see before the release tomorrow! =D

Very good comparison of graphics presentation... Really liked it...👍👍 Thumbs up dude

thank you for that chart in the end so useful!!!!

Currently playing this right now... its beautiful

Music sounds like if it was composed by Howard Shore the master mind behind The Lord of the Rings

muy buen video... bien echas las comparativas

Awesome vid would Be nice if u Can Show the fps diffrence between All These setting that would Be so cool thx and New subscriber

Candyland , what is your nvidia control panel settings?

Tomb Raider is amazing, had so much fun playing it on Xbone, will for sure get this on PC too

For anyone wondering, the reason low looks so bad is because it turns off shadows. If you turn them on it looks much better.

que buen video ahora a esperar la version de one vs 360 vs pc

this is why i love pc,customs graphics,max looks too blurry in textures,anti aliasing is so intense in some games that kills detail,so finding your better settings are very cool.

I casually bought this game on steam. I am blown away by how good it looks on max settings.. but maybe this is because i played dark souls 1 for the past few weeks.

Does this game support Two R9 390's in crossfire? I have an Acer Omidpx monitor with a resolution of 2560x1440p @144hz and would love to know before I buy the game if this setup would actually run well with this new game considering since its optimized by Nvidia.

very good comparison video.

well if they have very low setting then Lara will become agent 47

Hi Candyland!

Just wondering but what kind of graphics settings do you think I would need, My specs: Processor: Intel Core i7-4720HQ @ 2.60GHz (It clocks at 3.60GHz normally i check my clock speed quite often, and I don't have it overclocked??? Or maybe its factory? Idk this is an asus G751 series laptop) RAM: 8GB DDR3 Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

I see no change in ambient occlusion. Anyone help please?

I have this games and if you start playing on very high with everything cranked up you really have to know what to crank down with sacrificing the visual quality

what setting for pc is about comparable to xb1, high settings?

what is the difference with the tessellation?

The difference in Lara's face between low and ultra is huge. Low seems so pasted on and animated, ultra looks really life like. But there were a few settings that barely made any difference.

are the fx8350 and R9279x good enough for high settings?

can i run this game with zotac gts 450 1gb medium setting ?

Great videos

I started to play on high. Only at 10% walktrough the game started to lag a bit, so I turned them stats off. It is still kinda jolting at places. Wonder if it's the game or my pc

I have a 960m and i7 4720hq any chance of me playing on high with some tweaked settings?

aside from graphics, is there anything I need to know when my pc only meets min requirements? Does the game lag or is it still enjoyable to play?

@ravenwda007

8 жыл бұрын

+Foxyruns turn your settings down till it runs well. Graphics don't make the game. its a luxury.

Now thats a good game. Low is low enough that even people with not so good hardware can play it and very high/high looks just incredible

Gráficos no máximo, extremamente realista!!! Foda de +

Is the gameplay graphics and cinematic graphics the same for this game? I can't tell, but if so kudos to the TR team

Can someone explain me the difference between HBAO AND SSAO?

On what setting can i play with: AMD radeon hd 6970 Intel core i3 4170 12GB ram

Can i3 and GeForce 1050 with some 1920 & 1080 resolution run this game well?

Anyone else with a Gsync monitor and 144hz that's getting boiling temps on there GPU's? I have two 980's(MSI 4G) running in SLI and when it's getting close to ~100 fps and both GPU's are at ~98%, my temps are around ~82C. I have optimized the air flow within my case and a customized FAN chart, so that should not be the problem. Any tips/suggestions?

Why does the game look so blurry?

Which graphic card should i buy for stable 30 or 40 fps at high or max settings? I have i5-4460, 12GB RAM, GTX 660 and play on medium with 20 fps with some drops sometimes.

@ravenwda007

8 жыл бұрын

+DesuGamer I average 60fps with my 970 G1 CPU: i7 3770K @ 4.3GHz GPU: Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 - Power Limit = 110%, Core Clock MHz = +60, Memory Clock = +100 Memory: 32GB G.Skill Trident X 2400Mhz Motherboard: Gigabyte Z77X-UP7 OS: Windows 10 Professional 64bit Here are my settings. Resolution: 1920x1200 Preset: Custom Texture Quality: High Anisotropic Filter: 16X Antialiasing: FXAA Shadow Quality: High Sun Soft Shadows: High Depth of Field: Very High Level of Detail: Very High Dynamic Foliage: High Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+ Pure Hair: Very High Specular Reflection Quality: High Vignette Blur - Yes Motion Blur - Yes Bloom - Yes Tessellation - Yes Screen Space Reflections - Yes Lens Flares - Yes Screen Effects - Yes Film Grain - Yes Increasing these settings doesn't make the slightest improvement on my image quality and only hurts my frame rate.

Nice review (y)

for anyone interested tests show average frames (gtx980ti) 1080 - 82 fps 1440 - 63 fps 4 k - 37 fps hope this helps anyone with 980ti

@thecrow1448

8 жыл бұрын

+Colin Parks 4k 37 fps not bad

@colinparks619

8 жыл бұрын

Yeah pretty good it had some dips at 27 in places on max

@colinparks619

8 жыл бұрын

I think sweet spot is 1440 at 60fps on ultra

@thecrow1448

8 жыл бұрын

I think my EVGA GeForce GTX Titan X Superclocked 12GB Video Card can play 4k at 60 fps

@colinparks619

8 жыл бұрын

+The Crow try it man

the gameTomb Raider "rise of the romb Raider" only run on Grafics with DX11 3D acelarations ???? my laptop GPU Geforce9600M-GT work with DX11 direct3D, but on start the ROTTR show the warning says Your G.Card not support DX11 3D acelaration, why ?? can i configure my DX dialog to put 3D acelaration active?? what can i do??

i usually run the game with fxaa on, text quality on high, anistropic 4x, shadow off, depth of feild on, level of detail on medium. dynamic foliage on low, ambient occlusion off, pure hair on, vignette blur off, motion blur on, bloom on, tessellation off, screen reflections on, and bloom and lenseflare on.

SSAO - Super Saiyan Art Online

Amazing how little difference there is between medium graphics settings and maximum settings. There is ofc some difference. But medium and low are lightyears apart. minimum looks like a ps2 game while medium looks like the consoles. as long as my pc can run this at medium with hight texture details and im more then happy.

Good comparison.

I see no difference between Dynamic Foliage, am i the only one?

@Candyland

8 жыл бұрын

+Filsoh Dynamic Foliage only effects the movement of a tree. The higher the setting, the more trees are moving with the wind.

@Filsoh

8 жыл бұрын

Candyland Oh i see, btw can you tell me wich graphical options have major and minor impact on performance, for example, real hair- major, shadows- medium, textures-medium, ambient oclusion - minor etc (this were just examples i don't know their real impact)

@jayden7951

7 жыл бұрын

Filsoh hair, shadows

I´m very excited of this game and it´s performance. :D

is there no ultra preset in the game..?

Candyland, What kind of a problem did you have with SSAA? And why?

@Candyland

8 жыл бұрын

+Felis Silvestris It was buggy in the review version, but now it has been fixed by an update.

@felissilvestris

8 жыл бұрын

+Candyland Does SSAA remove all the flickering and crawling caused by aliasing that is very noticeable in this video? Or it's not much better than FXAA that does nothing but blurs the picture? BTW, great video! You did an exellent job!

@JoelDesouzartAhhhhhh

8 жыл бұрын

+Candyland Always excellent job, congrats!!! ;-)

@SlyNine

8 жыл бұрын

+Felis Silvestris Its a big step up from FXAA.

@crazynutguy

8 жыл бұрын

Personaly, i like FXAA a LOT more because of how it looks. It's more like... A style, rather than a downgrade!

Will it run on Icore5 8gba ram Invidia geforce 730 2gba DDr3 on high?

5:44 the temple looks creepy at minimum graphics

@aldenlopez24

8 жыл бұрын

Yup, everything else was still good-looking with minimum graphics right up until the look of that temple.

@matt326

7 жыл бұрын

nah its just cos the shadows are off

Can you redo the Pure Hair setting. I kind of want to see hair physics, not hair doing nothing. Other than that, great videos! A must before most purchases!

What music are here?

tf is the difference with dynamic foliage? there is nothing! if its off i do detect some difference but low, med, max is all the same? is it something to do with color (im colorblind)?

Help me please! On my PC which is GTX 970 + i7 4790K at high settings produces 25-40 at the PC powerful enough , what is it? I bought it to play that on ultra settings , not the medium ...

@ravenwda007

8 жыл бұрын

+Руслан Емельянов I average 60fps with my 970 G1 CPU: i7 3770K @ 4.3GHz GPU: Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 - Power Limit = 110%, Core Clock MHz = +60, Memory Clock = +100 Memory: 32GB G.Skill Trident X 2400Mhz Motherboard: Gigabyte Z77X-UP7 OS: Windows 10 Professional 64bit Here are my settings. Resolution: 1920x1200 Preset: Custom Texture Quality: High Anisotropic Filter: 16X Antialiasing: FXAA Shadow Quality: High Sun Soft Shadows: High Depth of Field: Very High Level of Detail: Very High Dynamic Foliage: High Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+ Pure Hair: Very High Specular Reflection Quality: High Vignette Blur - Yes Motion Blur - Yes Bloom - Yes Tessellation - Yes Screen Space Reflections - Yes Lens Flares - Yes Screen Effects - Yes Film Grain - Yes Try those settings. You should get my results. Your CPU is more powerful than mine.

is it me or does lara look slightly like her 2013 lara on low settings?

Looks great even on medium. I will tweak the settings to get constant 1080p60 on a 970. Framerate is the main feature of the PC version for me.

@RodinGaming

8 жыл бұрын

+THU31 If you can get it running with the hair physics at a decent fps it's worth it.

What's with optimization?

Can anyone suggest me mid range graphics card for laptop

as always... if you have a mid/low end PC, just put on high, and tweak a few settings to get 60 frames at 1080p.... beyond that, only a 970 and above !!

8 GB RAM gtx 950 2 GB i5 4590 3.3 ghz ??? settings ??

does anyone know if this game optimize well like metal gear solid 5 phantom pain?

with my rx 460 4gb i play this game on medium setting 1080p locked at 30 frames looks amazing

Nice compare 😉😉

I dont see any diference between max and high....

What about DX12?

Why in Xbox 360 dont have cutscenes like the minimum?

Hmm... Wonder if this game is worth downloading.

my laptop runts 2013 version on High , do I have chances now?maybe on LOW? 4GBRAM i5, Nvidia GeForce820M 1 Gb

@feropolo

8 жыл бұрын

+jorje vanelle you need 6GB RAM the minimum your laptop it will not handle it and it will burn

@Maciejkozlowski909

8 жыл бұрын

+jorje vanelle U should be ok, GeForce820M is basically equal to AMD 7670m and it runs fine on it so happy days :)

@jorjevanelle9879

8 жыл бұрын

+Matthew Kozlowsky thanks you

@MessiMerdo

8 жыл бұрын

+jorje vanelle you should be able to play at low at least.

seems like medium is the way to go for ROTR

@ZahinTan

8 жыл бұрын

+Jacob Walker Honestly, the high and very high don't look that different to me... Now I shall wait for steam sale.

my godd.. low looks like the preview render editor when they are making the game hahah

I hope the cpu usage is as good as it was on 2013

Completed entire game 2 times with a GTX 550 Ti medium preset at 30 - 40 Fps : )

min vs xbox 360?

@DennisKussener

6 жыл бұрын

from my observing eye, as I'm playing on the xbox 360 atm, about the same :p

I never will play ROTTR in max configs. My poor pc is a sucks :(

@chriscongdon3235

8 жыл бұрын

+Raphael Pereira (KriegerTod) a gtx 970 can play max with fxaa at 45-55 fps

@Raphaelpleite

8 жыл бұрын

But 970 GTX is 2 GB, right?

@lemonhaze715

8 жыл бұрын

+Raphael Pereira (KriegerTod) 3.5 gb. (4096MB)

@Gigaheart

8 жыл бұрын

+Raphael Pereira (KriegerTod) GTX 970 is 4gb but it is split across 2 partitions. One is 3.5 and the other slower one is the remainder.

@marcalbert674

8 жыл бұрын

+Raphael Pereira (KriegerTod) and you will never play ROTTR in low config.. Even if your PC sucks please don't let it endure that ugly mess, it'll melt down you eyes !!!

Test it on 720p too

gtx 780 good or not ???

Funny, sometimes low looks way better than max, because of the disabled shitty FXAA blurring antialiasing. I either play with MSAA or without the AA at all.

hi can my laptop handle this game i7 6700hq gtx 950m 16gb ram 128gb ssd

My System: AMD FX-8350 on Asus Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 16 GB HyperX Fury DDR3-RAM @ 1866 MHz (Dual Channel, 2x 8GB) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super Jetstream (Single, no SLI) Can I expect smooth gaming with everything maxed out including AA at 1080p? The predecessor Tomb Raider (2013) runs at 50 to 60 fps all maxed out (including TressFX realistic hair). I always play with VSync ON and I did not overclock anything except the CPU always runs at 4.3 GHz.

@VanilloBumbleboo1981

8 жыл бұрын

Maybe I can get my hands on the game soon. If it runs between 40 to 60 fps with FXAA I could live with it until I got enough money to switch to Z-170 and an i7-6700K. With 700 € paid for the GTX 980 Ti I'm not willing to turn down anything except AA, running at 1080p. 4k is too much to ask for, apparently.

@VanilloBumbleboo1981

8 жыл бұрын

Dear obviously rich girl! Respect other people's right not to have the one and only ultimate setup for maximum quality PC gaming! Thank you!

@VanilloBumbleboo1981

8 жыл бұрын

I bought the game today and I'm happy! Playing at 1080p, with everything at absolute max settings including Pure Hair very high. With the second best AA mode (2x SSAA) I'm getting 58 - 60 fps, rarely dropping to 45. With 4x SSAA it's from 30 up to 60 fps but a bit choppy. So my system can handle it greatly. Even with an FX-8350 running at 4.3 GHz! : )

ambient occlusion . explain me please . what's that ?

@idanniv3264

7 жыл бұрын

Ambient occlusion adds more realistic lighting

@shashiwardhansingh3831

7 жыл бұрын

Ohh.. but still it's almost noticeable

@CaptDnaDonut

7 жыл бұрын

Ambient Occlusion has to do with shadows where two objects meet not lighting.

Will i be able to play this on max with Amd fx 8300 octa core 4.2 Ghz,GTX 1050 Ti 4gb and 8 GB RAM memory?

@Amsztel

6 жыл бұрын

Medium at 30fps and low at 60fps with your config bro...

and like always, the difference between low and medium are huge, and the difference between medium and ultra are small

PUREHAIR is such a nice thing, it reminds me of the witcher 3's NVIDIA HAIRWORKS.

@gaminggarments4186

5 жыл бұрын

But much much better optimized AMD did a great work with pure hair

@dniwetamp

5 жыл бұрын

it's unplayable for me without purehair

someone know if my gtx 760 2gb can handle 30 fps on medium in 1920x1080 ?

@stuffclusters

7 жыл бұрын

yes, also you can set something on high

Fucking Denuvo !

@Lukyz69

8 жыл бұрын

+Lukis Chalupis What about actually buying the game if you want to play it? ;)

@unknownentity835

8 жыл бұрын

+Lukyz I just try this game and maybe buy ....sorry my english is sometimes bad 😁

@geier54

8 жыл бұрын

Yeah fucking right #Death_to_Denuvo

@hdgfkjxclf

8 жыл бұрын

Denuvo sucks xD

@yourdoom9868

8 жыл бұрын

+Lukyz the problem is not buying the game but denuvo puts a big load on the CPU and shortens the life of your PC by months or even years

At 5:34 It looks like xbox 360