"Keep religion out of schools. And politics." 👏👏👏👏👏

@IssyFishyy

3 жыл бұрын

Then i wonder why abortion rates, theft and murder rates went significantly higher than before once the Bible stopped being taught at school.

@vignesh1065

2 жыл бұрын

@@IssyFishyy It has nothing to do with religion. There are other social factors at play, stuff like liberalizing crime isn't in anyway connected to a collective disbelief in god. Atheists just like theists are mixed with people who hold moral values in high regard and the ones that don't.

@IssyFishyy

2 жыл бұрын

@@vignesh1065 Yes, i know that correlation doesn’t imply causation. But the fact that there is correlation indicates something. For example, child sacrifice was considered a barbaric act once Christianity came around. And the fact that laws themselves were based off religions. Whether you believe in it or not, you can’t deny that religion does a great job (Albeit, not perfect) at stabilizing morality.

@Mr-DNA_

2 жыл бұрын

@@IssyFishyy False. Religion damages morality.

@IssyFishyy

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mr-DNA_ Sure, talk is cheap. Give evidence.

I worked in a prison for 25 years. Some humans DO throw their feces.

@85Funkadelic

5 жыл бұрын

I work with developmentally disabled adults.... Can confirm.

@TonyEnglandUK

5 жыл бұрын

lol oh man, that comment is, already, my fave comment of 2019.

@istolethisaccount

5 жыл бұрын

TheNeonRabbit That might’ve been me. Sorry!

@superalvin7208

5 жыл бұрын

I have shit in a bag and put a firecracker down the bag

@superalvin7208

5 жыл бұрын

Or maybe you say shat in past tense? Yeah i shat in a bag

Holy shit , that guy became an atheist at the age of 16!!! I became an atheist at the age of 39 after a long slavery in the terror of islam.

@Raydensheraj

5 жыл бұрын

I was Atheist from birth on...

@rustysmith3565

5 жыл бұрын

Selvatore bonucci :: Well done mate, every credit to you for doing your own thinking .

@studio-flash

5 жыл бұрын

Haaa very funny

@lwellsy3395

5 жыл бұрын

oof

@jeffreyphillips4182

5 жыл бұрын

We all evolve at different rates. I was 40

There are not enough people of Richard’s calibre around. Thank you Richard for your stamina, bravery, character and clarity of thought

@stevelaw3886

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed. I'm making a point of replying primarily to remind you 3 years later. First time I've personally seen it, and yes, I am drunk.

@jamespegg6418

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevelaw3886 q

@bmcash3411

2 жыл бұрын

LMAO

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

Steven, you are really stoo-pid. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzread.info/dash/bejne/imuclKqQk7fdkZc.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/

@michaelpayne8691

2 жыл бұрын

What a great reason for faith 😂

This man brings a smile on my face every time.. He’s my role model and my hero!

@jamespalmer980

2 жыл бұрын

Why? He is a bitter little man who thinks he knows it all and mocks anyone with a different point of view.

@Chimera_166

Жыл бұрын

@@jamespalmer980 He's a public spokesperson for rational thinkers, an advocate for free thinking. Freeing the mind from all delusions of Religion. People are scared to think outside the bubble because they can't comprehend rationalism

@soraya2218

Жыл бұрын

As a woman, he gives me the creeps. His association with Jeffrey Epstein is a big red flag.

@Paul-ts5qw

Жыл бұрын

@@jamespalmer980 Religion deserves to be mocked.

@petercollins7730

Жыл бұрын

@@jamespalmer980 No, he mocks people who are massively ignorant and proudly spew out their ignorant nonsense. He is quite accepting of people who have a different point of view. You are welcome to your own opinion - you are not welcome to your own (alleged) facts.

Evolution is a fact. People who say “it’s a theory” are missing two main points. 1) they do not understand the actual meaning of what a scientific theory. 2) Even saying it’s “a theory” doesn’t exclude the fact that evolution is a FACT. The theory explains how evolution happens.

@meryatathagres1998

5 жыл бұрын

Indeed, a scientific theory is something that is almost certain. The word in science for ideas is hypothesis.

@robhoward9614

4 жыл бұрын

@Monica Merino smh

@robhoward9614

4 жыл бұрын

@Monica Merino three letters: D N A

@gpz219

4 жыл бұрын

@Monica Merino The common link among all life can be found in DNA. All creatures on Earth share the same genetic code. If we didn't all have common ancestors, all the way back to the first single-celled organisms, we might expect to then see different genetic codes in the present set of extant species. If even a single exception were to be found that couldn't be explained, we would have to re-think our theory of evolution and the origin of species.

@_sarpa

4 жыл бұрын

@Monica Merino Is this what you mean? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossil

Let's face it, anyone who says evolution is a lie , hasn't been able to shake off their childhood religious indoctrination

@rayolight9744

3 жыл бұрын

Let's face it your still can't see the truth only made up nonsense Evolution is brainless blind has no mind can't think .you people do the thinking for the false reason for intelligent life

@w8m4n

3 жыл бұрын

@@rayolight9744 how god damn ironic

@rayolight9744

3 жыл бұрын

@@w8m4n God before there brainless theories that's true

@w8m4n

3 жыл бұрын

@@rayolight9744 ...what?

@rayolight9744

3 жыл бұрын

@@w8m4n GOD before you being anything at all do you understand

"That is spectacularly stupid" 😂🤣😂🤣

British people. So polite that they complement before insulting.

@inkwellflood8276

5 жыл бұрын

Nice comment - fucktard. We also love irony.

@dusanninic9572

5 жыл бұрын

@@inkwellflood8276 ...abd maideny ! 😉

@final_mile_music9713

4 жыл бұрын

inkwell flood Perfect.

@athenaminerva8954

4 жыл бұрын

Compliment?

@Aydinmakesmusic

4 жыл бұрын

We build you up and then strike you down.. its an art.

It's good to see him have a nice time in an interview.

@maximumpotential3796

2 жыл бұрын

For once.. 😂😂

I wish he would live forever...greeting from Slovakia :)

@diegoyuiop

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, seeing him now is a bit sad, but that's life :)

@WarlonWinterheart

3 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod That is spectacularly stupid

@WarlonWinterheart

3 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod Which god are you referring to? One of the thousands of current ones or some of the previous ones that people don't believe in anymore?

@WarlonWinterheart

3 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod This has to be the weirdest parody account on youtube.

@w8m4n

3 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod why are you so desperate for evolution to be false? It's almost like you have your mind already set on something else.

Richard Dawkins like Christopher Hitchenson will live forever in our hearts and mind. We are blessed that they walk this planet

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

Forever only exists in the belief of eternity

@asner1

2 жыл бұрын

His surname was Hitchens not Hitchenson.

@ihaventshoweredin6weeksbut527

Жыл бұрын

@LOLYOU DOOF yep thank God he exist right?

@davidreinhart418

Жыл бұрын

Respectfully, what did Dawkins and Hitchens do for us?

@efc4693

Жыл бұрын

I was thinking the same

" that is spectacularly stupid"- the great Richard Dawkins

@robertmitchell4707

5 жыл бұрын

michael Lombard was it always a was it naturally that way no

@connorwalsh6082

5 жыл бұрын

That line needs to become a meme!

@rosewhite---

5 жыл бұрын

Evolution is spectacularly stupid! But don't forget Dawkins is possessed by a demon. Check his handwriting.

@user-jy2sz1jr9p

5 жыл бұрын

@@rosewhite--- evolution is a process; how can you characterize a process as stupid?

@rosewhite---

5 жыл бұрын

@@user-jy2sz1jr9p Easy - only stupid like you believe the THEORY of evolution is real - but you can't provide a single missing link to verify it - so that make you and your silly THEORY stupid!

He adds meaning to clarity, what a brilliant guy. I am so lucky to have been born and around his time. It's an honour. Thank you so much Richard Dawkins Sir for cracking all lunatic nuts around. You will be remembered for ever SIR. LONG LIVE SIR RICHARD DAWKINS.

@sachi330

Жыл бұрын

@@rickrandomites What a lucky guy you are all the best.

@MisterTea123

Жыл бұрын

Did you know that Dawkins got eleven holes in one first time he played golf?

"That is spectacularly stupid"😂😂😂😂

@barbarannop1799

5 жыл бұрын

Winston Grettum are you talking about Richard Dawkins?

Evolution, The Greatest Show on Earth is more spiritual and amazing than any religious nonsense out there.

@thewaytruthandlife

3 жыл бұрын

agreed it is bullshit....

@sox5124

3 жыл бұрын

Give this a watch Jon. With all respect.

@sox5124

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/mIx6rayhhaq0g5s.html

@fritula6200

3 жыл бұрын

Who create that greatest show on earth.

@marcob9124

2 жыл бұрын

Would you mind to tell what you mean by religious nonsense and what would be your favorite example for your belief? Also I need to say that your post is ambiguous and the meaning may only be known to you.

One of the smartest men around. One of the smartest at the explanation and the easiest to understand. I have often been held in awe of this man. Cheers Richard.

@dyschromotopia

2 жыл бұрын

I do like RD but he doesn't go for the throat like Hitchens, he is a bit too soft on his opponents.......admittedly, he has little time for mindless fools who are beyond reason, but hitch loved to ridicule everyone regardless of their intellect & he did so with ease, slapping the shit out of their argument for the supernatural.

@saarth2678

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mark3-16 source?

@stevelaw3886

2 жыл бұрын

@@dyschromotopia wtf is with his brother?

@dyschromotopia

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevelaw3886 Christ knows, it is mind boggling how their beliefs, views & reasoning can be polar opposites. Maybe Peter thought he would forever be in Christopher's shadow if he shared the same perspective & opinion?

@stevelaw3886

2 жыл бұрын

@@dyschromotopia perhaps that's it. Unfortunately for him, the end result is he's still in his shadow, except he's also a smug w***** and a disinformation peddler with it.

"Whether water is salt or fresh, shit floats"

@bazpearce9993

2 жыл бұрын

Shit does float better in salt water coz of the density.

@gz9520

2 жыл бұрын

If your shit is floating you are eating way to much fat.

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

Hilarious 😂😂😂

@lwmaynard5180

2 жыл бұрын

Pure Science is not sewer science the evolution revolution is a pollution, not a solution ? ? ? 😁 😁 😄

@realQkstar

2 жыл бұрын

@@lwmaynard5180 okay thanks

Evolution is a fact not a belief

@al7422

5 жыл бұрын

Kian Swami I by no means deny evolution but still there is a reason I don't like Dawkins anymore. Dawkins is promoting evolution like religion and you just to believe in it as a fact. Sounds familiar? It's kinda like saying *Jesus died for you believe it or go to hell*.

@isorokudono

5 жыл бұрын

Use the Scientific Method to prove it right now then.

@kraokingxyz1397

5 жыл бұрын

@@al7422 Evolution is a fact regardless of what others believe because it's been verified through countless studies. The main difference is that evolution has empirical evidence to back it up while religion makes nonsensical claims that relies on wishful thinking, willful ignorance, and blind faith. Dawkins is simply stating facts to try and relieve people of their ignorance of an ancient book with no proof to support the claims made

@al7422

5 жыл бұрын

@@kraokingxyz1397 Did I ever say anything against evolution. And studies have proven evolution empirically but not the origin of human( because you can't go back in time or recreate the same scenario) My problem with Dawkins is the way he preaches evolution is just wrong. And his followers have made a cult around him which makes it hard to disagree with him without getting an outburst from the toxic following.

@pelesky100

5 жыл бұрын

“Evolution” is a fairy tale and fairy tales are fictitious...... to the OPPOSITE of facts, Slappy!

If ever a movie needed to cast a college professor, Dawkins could play the role perfectly. Damn, he LOOKS like what you'd expect one to look like.

I imagen people are thinking pokemon when evolution is the topic.

@blop-a-blop9419

5 жыл бұрын

IAmAnApeJustLikeYou Ape OMG you might actually be right about their misconception lol. The Pokemon phenomenon should actually be called 'metamorphosis' to not be confused with darwinian evolution

@blop-a-blop9419

5 жыл бұрын

IAmAnApeJustLikeYou Ape But also it would be nice if Americans would have proper education in school, so that they cannot think this much bullshit about that so metaphysically important scientific theory.

@zeroireland

5 жыл бұрын

Apes evolve into humans at level 36. You can use a moon stone on them before that but they only evolve into theists and don't learn any new moves.

@Competitive_Antagonist

5 жыл бұрын

Some Christian guy asked me why I haven't evolved. He actually had a degree in engineering and maths.

@paulk9188

5 жыл бұрын

Athiesm was literally created to push communism. Marx invented it lol

Saddest vid is Dr Dawkins hugging Christopher Hitchens at one of his last appearances.

@jadonharper1493

5 жыл бұрын

Tracy LF that was indeed a very sad moment, we truly lost a powerfully moral and witty man...

@musicauthority7828

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely Its heart breaking to watch, I've watched it several times and I would watch it many more times. but it's quite painful to watch, it was Christopher Hitchens last public lecture and he died about two weeks later. yes Hitch was something else.

Professor Dawkins is an inspiration and a brilliant educator. Bill Maher is no slow coach either.

@bretzajac7986

5 жыл бұрын

you are easily impressed

@annk.8750

4 жыл бұрын

@Jingoist There's a 2016 article on the Piltdown fraud, but I don't see a mention of Darwin. What are you looking at?

@davidjones-vx9ju

4 жыл бұрын

oh yes he is

@roberthawkes2023

4 жыл бұрын

truthhurts101 ...... oh my word all you people are totally and utterly daft to believe this nonsense. We are not monkeys . Where is the evidence where is the skeletons of the evolution in motion.

@darthtenebra5910

4 жыл бұрын

@@roberthawkes2023 Evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution explains those facts. A theory in science is different from how we use it in everyday language. A scientific theory is the interpretation of observations and facts; the pinnacle of achievement in science. Correct, we are not monkeys. We share a common ancestor with them. This is just one of countless examples that creationists don't understand how evolution works. We are all that our ancestors were. We are still apes; we are still primates; we are still mammals; we are still tetrapods; we are still vertebrates; we are still animals; and we are still eukaryotes. Evolution is basically that populations of animals change over time. The most commonly known aspect of evolution is natural selection which is the idea that organisms which are most suited to their environment will survive longer, therefore have more offspring, and therefore their genes will be more prevalent in subsequent generations. This has been observed. Another definition is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations - or to put it another way; change in allele frequencies over time. That is a FACT, no getting around it.

perfect ending! whether waters salty or fresh, shit floats! amen...

@m.qambarnawshad9600

6 жыл бұрын

C.W Dervin please respect others values.

@numbersix9477

5 жыл бұрын

@@dicktrickle875 Interesting that you go by "Dick."

@Musika1220

5 жыл бұрын

Bill's last comment really made me laugh. It was very well said. But still, very few atheists are respectful and none condescending. The worst of all to me is Sam Harris. I prefer Dawkins and deGrasse Tyson approach to atheism. I could listen to those two for hours.

@WichitaGuy56

4 жыл бұрын

Nope. Only some shit floats. If you have enough fiber in your diet it will float. If not, it sinks like a rock. So that statement is bullshit, so to speak.

@elvedingrosic

3 жыл бұрын

Dawkins did'nt understand... what they say to him. Two oceans dont mix. But such is Dawkins... He hear only him self. I think that Dawkins laying about this school, just to look like smart on television.

To be a Theist, one must suspend all logic, reason, sense and facts.

@bryfryable

7 жыл бұрын

you would think that, but you'd be surprised when you break down what belief aligns the most with our beliefs that right and wrong do exist.

@josebracamontes2754

7 жыл бұрын

saxmanchiro not really.

@tempname4039

6 жыл бұрын

Dawkins is agnostic.

@judeboys6409

6 жыл бұрын

saxmanchiro well said

@duke-swtmate4154

6 жыл бұрын

+saxmanchiro Isaac Newton, Nikolas Kopernikus, and Galileo Galilei all believed in God. According to your logic, all these three scientists suspended "all logic, reason, sense and facts".

I _came out_ as an atheist in my late teens early twenties and had to leave my country. Well, I did not have to leave _because_ I became an atheist, but an overly religious society just did not seem appealing to me, and anyway, I really could not fit. Exactly like Dr Dawkins says, everyday you are reminded how stupidly blind people are. People who are otherwise very intelligent, but yet choose to follow some book because they think it was sent from the heavens by a mystical all-knowing character. That was depressing, and annoying. So I left. Arrivederci.

@late8641

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your story. My upbringing was non-religious. It isn't an achievement to be an atheist if you were never religious, so people like you are the true champions or reason in my eyes. I salute you!

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

When you think that everyone around you is stupid and you are the only wise person, trust me, you are probably at least as stupid as the people around you, if not more stupid. I say this from personal experience.

I was already in my 40's before I lost my faith and became an atheist. Why did it take so long? Perhaps because all my family and friends, my neighbors, my countrymen (USA) are mostly religious. I was afraid to be different.

@MrDaiseymay

Жыл бұрын

it's good that you're not GAY too--are ya?

This is a man who I would love to be a friend.

@2fast2block

5 жыл бұрын

Tony, if you ever do befriend him, can you ask him how the universe came exactly from nothing?

@tonysuffolk

5 жыл бұрын

Sure, but as he is an evolutionary biologist rather than a cosmologist, he may not be the one to ask. You are making something of an assumption that it "came exactly from nothing" sic

@2fast2block

5 жыл бұрын

@@tonysuffolk "Sure, but as he is an evolutionary biologist rather than a cosmologist, he may not be the one to ask." Then why is he saying it if he does not know? "You are making something of an assumption that it "came exactly from nothing" sic" "sic", really? Richard Dawkins sums it up in his afterword: “Even the last remaining trump card of the theologian, ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?,’ shrivels up before your eyes as you read these pages. If ‘On the Origin of Species’ was biology’s deadliest blow to super­naturalism, we may come to see ‘A Universe From Nothing’ as the equivalent from cosmology. The title means exactly what it says. And what it says is ­devastating.” Shove that up your sic assuming ass.

@tonysuffolk

5 жыл бұрын

Just a small point. The term "sic" does not mean "sick". I would not suggest anything you said was sick; that would just be offensive. Sic means a direct quote, ignoring any grammatical errors. In this interview Dawkins does not say anything about the origin of the universe we live in. I'm sorry if you thought I was being rude. There is little to be gained by flinging insults. The origin of the universe is a huge puzzle and we may never manage to understand how it came into existence. It's a work in progress for Science.

@2fast2block

5 жыл бұрын

​@@tonysuffolk "Sic means a direct quote, ignoring any grammatical errors." I know exactly what it meant. "Sic means a direct quote, ignoring any Sic means a direct quote, ignoring any grammatical errors. What are my "grammatical errors." Dawkins believes in "exactly" nothing created the universe. Would you prefer "literally nothing"? He says that too. kzread.info/dash/bejne/h4hnxsiJf8enibg.html "In this interview Dawkins does not say anything about the origin of the universe we live in." I didn't say he did specifically. He said atheist many times and evolution many times. There's also cosmological evolution. Do you feel ashamed of what Dawkins is saying about nothing and want to change the subject to spare you the embarrassment? "The origin of the universe is a huge puzzle and we may never manage to understand how it came into existence. It's a work in progress for Science." Really? Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. So you had no idea nothing does nothing. You have no idea about the 1LT and 2LT. You're saying we don't know them? We know them and have NO doubts about them. None. "There is little to be gained by flinging insults." They are not insults when I prove the person deserves the title. Doubting a supernatural creation and not what I call a smart person. Saying exactly nothing and literally nothing created the universe is not what I call an intellectual. Maybe you do but not me. Again, "The origin of the universe is a huge puzzle and we may never manage to understand how it came into existence. It's a work in progress for Science." If it was such a puzzle why does Dawkins claim to know nothing created the universe? Golly jeepers you walk right into these traps. Science shows it could not have happened naturally. Resorting and hoping in science fiction is for fools. And if that is not stupid enough, to think the laws of nature just came about on their own. You people are not insane, you just chose to be dumbasses. ALL we know without a doubt proves creation HAD to be supernatural and thus done by a supernatural creator, but you want to be a dumbass along with dumbass Dawkins as he brags about how nice it is to be an atheist. I will say though, it does make me wonder if you all did evolve from a scum pond seeing the scum you all are. You don't go where the truth leads, you go where your pride leads.

Richard Dawkins and Christopher hitchens are my hero’s

@AllansStation

4 жыл бұрын

He speaks the truth and the religious can't take the truth

@A-VeryJudgemental-Guy

3 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod I'm not interested in you're copy paste nonsense. Thanks though

@ramzifouadkhelfane6589

3 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod thank you for you comment mate, it is really helpful to debunk the myth of evolution, i'll just suggest to you to do some research about the Holy Coran and take some insights from the Islamic perspective about the Origin of life and the features of The intelligent designer according to the Holy Coran ! Good luck brother and thanks again

Don't you wish you could hear professor Dawkins speak in person? It would be awesome!!!

@davidreinhart418

Жыл бұрын

Why would I want to pay to see and hear an intellectually blind person?

@davidzeledon61

Жыл бұрын

@@davidreinhart418 you are not being directed nor ordered to purchase a ticket to listen to Mr. Dawkins, if you don't feel like listening to the man don't.

people like Richard Dawkins make me proud to be human

@elvisjacob9484

5 жыл бұрын

Raymond S. Same for me.We need these types of persons to be happy.Because they teach us

@geraldlee7137

5 жыл бұрын

I don't know arrogant , I'm the smartest person in any room I walk into types , just rub me wrong .

@pirateman1144

4 жыл бұрын

@@geraldlee7137 But when Dawkins walks into a room he most likely is the smartest person present. Confidence and arrogance aren't the same.

@truthbetold8610

4 жыл бұрын

Only if the room is empty.

@robertlongwill8856

4 жыл бұрын

@@geraldlee7137 you're probably the smartest person in that room because you're probably the only one in that room lol dumbass comment from a dumbass

Thank you Professor Dawkins. Your logic and reason is greatly appreciated in world of irrationality.

@marcob9124

2 жыл бұрын

I am not sure what you mean here and I mean which passage especially you refer to, but the Professor is one of the reasons of the world going more irrational every day. He is in fact so unbelievable irrational that he pretends to believe that random mutation plus natural selection does produce complex meaningful interdependent software. It cant get much much more irrational. I personally believe he his lying on this for money. Before people told him that he should need to reduce his illogicality and random ignorance he was saying that there is no God. This is not to top and he also suffers the idea that he knows waht God would do he pretends not to exist if you look at his giraffe video - which btw is a Dawkins worship video if you ask me, but again, thats subjective and you may say he has deserved it. But hey, according to his definition he is a mass child abuser and student abuser and lets just for a second imagine that the bible is right on eternal justice for criminals then Dawkins will have more pain at his hands then Hitler and Stalin together. Dawkins is either foolish and irrational (some say illogical = irrational =insane) or a gifted deceiver or both.

@Rich7714

2 жыл бұрын

@@marcob9124 "Dawkins will have more pain at his hands then Hitler and Stalin together." Marco - do you see how believing in religion is making you a hate-filled person. Religious people like you, Marco, love talking about the pain others will suffer after death. If only you would step back & look in the mirror, maybe you'd see how following religion is our world's real evil.

@marcob9124

2 жыл бұрын

@@Rich7714 Hi Rich, good to meet you and joining the search for truth. Rich - I understand your subjective illogical emotional response and your utter disrespect for reality. And I cant answer such post. If you have a meaningful response I am very much happy in trying to answer you. Give it a try please. But rants are not a mature response, would you agree? See please tell me why you are so fundamentalist that your believe you have the true religion? Stalin thought so, Hitler thought so, the pope I think does not, ...why do you have the arrogance and believe that you have the right belief (Please spare me your definition what religion is, got about 600 mails with it in the last 10 years. Whats your reason to tell me that you have truth? And there are other things I dont understand about your strange thinking, but we can discuss it later. For now I am only interested why you even have the audacity to claim truth. Thx for your meaningful and consistent and hate speech free response in advance. (If you can - also spare me from empty phrases which you have not checked before using - got tons. See, you need to know that 99% of all people come out of state school and parrot the same stuff. So I get the same over and over and over again. I mean the nonsense here, I have no problem if you repeat truth!)

@Rich7714

2 жыл бұрын

​@@marcob9124 You could almost be considered the personification of Passive Aggressiveness, Marco. Interesting. You may want to work on your grammar & spelling though, as it contributes to your incoherence, which is already near the extreme due to your religious fanaticism. When you complain that my perfectly reasonable response is a "rant", when you yourself then go on to provide a rant 10x larger, you show a rather excessive amount of hypocricy. If you misinerpret logic & reasoning for "ranting", then you will forever be unable to engage in dialogue with people. As you say "And I cant answer such post.", which I find rather predictable; opposing oneself to logic & reason rarely grants the religiously insane a successful rebuttal. I notice you also enjoy putting words in peoples' mouths: "you have the true religion?" -I never claimed to have "a religion" - on the contrary, I'm am not religious. The one thing I do believe is that you have 600 emails against you; maybe you should spend less time fighting in your futile religiously insane scheming. Then maybe people wouldn't dislike you so much. Give it a thought! "And I cant answer" - So Marco, since you refuse to answer for your case against logic and reasoning, we may go no further in our discussion; I hence bid you farewell. I await your doubtless predicable religious fanatic response, and after you're done typing away, you may then continue spending your time attacking others online. Goodday Marco

@marcob9124

2 жыл бұрын

@@Rich7714 Hi Nick, good morning as it is here. Good to see you interested in truth, truly curious what you got... You: "You could almost be considered the personification of Passive Aggressiveness, Marco." >>> Do you think I should be a bit more aggressive like Dawkins and his disciples (not all of course!, maybe not even many since humans do like to reduce life to a comfortable level... )? Ok, I will work on my skills to get into the real fights. You: "Interesting. You may want to work on your grammar & spelling though, as it contributes to your incoherence, which is already near the extreme due to your religious fanaticism." >>> Sure I am a fan of my world view, are you not? Why are you writing me? To get your thoughts more clear? To defend your religion (of course you have none, right?) To be honest, I have no clue what you mean here, since I usually dont write much about what I believe to be true, so please tell me what you are referring to here. The subject cant be Evolution since it is not religious or is it? I consider it a gullible faith which makes many people who kind of militantly believe in it - religious. Some I have met are true religious fanatics about their faith. Its shocking how they can put a good old roman catholic or believing muslime to shame. Anyway, lets see what else you got, but please dont forget to inform me what you think about my religious content in order that I may understand you. Sadly I have not much time to learn English. So if you are unable to catch the content please move somewhere else unless you have a religious need to mission and to convert me to your faith/religion - then I will understand your desire to understand me correctly. My spanish is worse then my English. Whats your second language Nick? You: "When you complain that my perfectly reasonable response is a "rant", ..." >>> Would you please c&p your perfect reasonable response again? I have not found a logical argument Nick. You do know that some people do actually think they have perfect reasonable beliefs while all it is is tales. So please give me the exact quote what you are referring to that I may see what you in your belief system call perfect reasonable response. It may be reasonable to you but not valid at all, right? You: "...when you yourself then go on to provide a rant 10x larger, " >>> I love it to parrot the religious gullible evolutionists. BTW I learn dit from them I think (again, not all are militant aggressive religious missioners and ranters!, but see, the silent one I dont read often since they are silent, so most people at plataformas are quite "active" in their zeal to say it carefully, right? You are an excemption of course I tend to believe. ) You: "...you show a rather excessive amount of hypocricy." >>> No Nick, that does not fly, its hopefully obvious or I need to increase my copying of militant Atheists in order to make it absolutely and unmistakably clear that I am doing the parody and trying to mirror those guys. If you are not among the task force of that sect - just dont feel triggered at all and smile and watch the games. You: " If you misinterpret logic & reasoning for "ranting", then you will forever be unable to engage in dialogue with people." >>> I understand what you are saying here, but you presume that you have reasoned logically. I have not seen it yet. See, there are people out there who believe that the theory of evolution is a good sound their and that evolution is a fact. Great faith! But is just deception. And they brag and wallow in their supposed scientific educated enlightened superstition. Is such not painful to see? What say you? How can one think that random mutation and natural selection is writing complex software? Whats wrong in the mind? You: "As you say "And I cant answer such post.", which I find rather predictable; opposing oneself to logic & reason rarely grants the religiously insane a successful rebuttal." >>> Sorry, please quote the section you are referring to. You: "I notice you also enjoy putting words in peoples' mouths: "you have the true religion?" -I never claimed to have "a religion" - on the contrary, I'm am not religious." >>> Oh you believe you are not religious? Thats quiet interesting. You made my day for sure! Hey Nick all world view is religion or all religion is world view. You may have a definition for religion that does tell you that it involves eating fish on Friday and having a supranatural power being worshipped and I dont want to disturb you in your sleep, but I am not bying such special talk. Its like "I dont have believe in NOgod, I just lack faith in a deity. Whats that? I give you list with premises and you make your cross (*x*) or *o* in every line and when you are done: thats your belief system. Your religion. Your faith. Your creed. Your world view. You may play with words and make yourself happy to tell yourself you are not religious. Fine. Ok. I see it rather simple: There is ONE true religion out there since I believe that truth real exists. And if your faith is not that true one then you have a false religion. So you can call it a false faith - fine with me. Believe that you have no religion but faith - fine, be happy! You: "The one thing I do believe is that you have 600 emails against you; " >>> It was a fictive number but I understand your faith since it fits your faith! I get this one. Thats why evolutionists like to read about evolution - it fits the faith, You: "..maybe you should spend less time fighting in your futile religiously insane scheming." >>> Thats your religious preset and I tend to understand your programming, so you have few choice to put me in any other box but such as your religion has for me. And you feel so good if you think that you are none religious and you can look at me and think: poor religious fellow. Again, what do you believe that I believe why you call me religious insane schemist? What was I confessing that you are referring to? You last line looks rather as you are a victim of religious framing of your camp Nick? Awake? Or dulled into all kinds of stereotype and thinking put on holidays? I cant wait for your answer where you will put things together for me! BTW, I could call you exactly the same and you have no arguments to refute it. Thats the problem when you do the parrot of phrase form your church, you need to substantiate it. Cant wait .... Then maybe people wouldn't dislike you so much. Give it a thought! You: " "And I cant answer" - So Marco, since you refuse ..." >>> Nononono Nick, thats your faith! But since you still beloieve you made an argument - please qute it and I will be happy to have fun with it. I just have not seen a locical valid argument yet. Not even in this opost is even a remote argument, Its rant only. No fact, no theory, no quote of any other person, no reference no own thought yet. Only stereotypes against me. Its a failed argument, except the one you posted which I have not seen. Please post it as a quote. thx. You: "to answer for your case against logic and reasoning, we may go no further in our discussion;" >>> Sorry, you have started a discussion? Are you sure Nick? Not in this post and some can see! (people with your programming will not see it since they think like you think which is likely for most people coming out of 10 years constant programming and framing. (Do you know foren where people thumb up each otghers nonsnese? Amazing to see how programming works. And all thats contrary to their faith will be attacked but notb argued. They cant argue the case most often since they never thought through their own position - some can live even for decades without having heard any contrary opinion. Thats the framed world we have arrived at after 70 years public school in the west. And logic is not even taught. Is this not crazy? Its also called indoctrination and Dawkins would call it child abuse in his religious zeal. Poor fellow, but I think he is playing the game ... anyway, he is almost done and will pass as we all will maybe. You: " I hence bid you farewell." >>> Have a good time Nick and enjoy the great world. You: "I await your doubtless predicable religious fanatic response, " >>>Sure, I need to answer your predictable religious fanatic position. But I am also looking forward to your empty religious predictable answer from the program playback. Its all in the 600 mails/posts. 99% of all people are inline with the program. Very predictable. Its so tough that they are almost identical. >That in itself is not a problem since if something would be true ..... the confessing of that truth would be identical. But so it is with your church and their creed - identical for all subscribers. And so they confess together: WE believe...... You: "...and after you're done typing away, you may then continue spending your time attacking others online. " >>> What I wonder is why you wasted your time attacking me. Any idea Nick? If you are aware - there is a lack of clear self view. If you are not aware - there is another problem de to the program. Get out Nick, save your mind. Its a dead religion you serve. A false religion. Materialism is a false premise of a world view (religion)

We do have a common ancestor with bananas! They were protozoa eukaryotic life forms.

@IIrandhandleII

6 жыл бұрын

Rocky Alfresco yep, with all living things.

@MM-hi

6 жыл бұрын

Yep

@barbarannop1799

5 жыл бұрын

Yobany yes, you can see that all animals look alike in some way or another

@huckthatdish

5 жыл бұрын

Yobany depending on your definition of life it’s possible that’s not true. whether viruses are alive is up for debate. And it frankly depends on your definition, but it’s very likely that they are separate from the evolutionary tree of animals, plants and bacteria. I tend to think pockets dna/rna which propagate and change over time due to natural selection is life. But there is the argument to be made they aren’t self propagating and therefor aren’t alive.

@P.H.888

5 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

6:20 - Kim Jong Il?! - that’s nothing: the Greeks awarded Nero a victory in all 1,808 events during a single Olympiad because he gave them a tax break...

Thank you Dr. Dawkins for your teachings.

@adriancoppola3729

2 жыл бұрын

Professor Dawkins to be pedantic.

@petyrkowalski9887

2 жыл бұрын

They are not teachings. He is not a preacher. He relays scientific facts backed up by solid and tested evidence.

@tokitaohmasboobies726

2 жыл бұрын

@@petyrkowalski9887 and religious people relies on a man-made book

After months of following his work, I finally bought The Selfish Gene and The God Delusion today. Starting with the latter, it's gonna be one hell of a reading sesh 🤣

@TheLochs

2 жыл бұрын

Both are great reads, enjoy!

@riproar11

Жыл бұрын

You're doing what Dawkins wants you to do. Buy his books and line his pockets instead of think for yourself. Save your money as you can witness The Selfish Gene in any Walmart or sketchy neighborhood. Some men become baby daddies and a woman has kids from three different fathers. If the woman finds a simp male to give her a place to live and help raise the kids, the baby daddies and the mom win. That sums it up and you can save your time with the useless reading.

@stefus97

7 ай бұрын

@@riproar11 retard alert!!!

I love that man! I have a man, brain crush on him. He has thought me so much watching his videos and reading his books and even better he has helped me learn how to think and how to ask myself proper questions.

@hareecionelson5875

4 жыл бұрын

I like his barbed retorts, but that does put others off listening to what he says. Have you seen his 90s Christmas Lectures at the Royal Science Institute on Evolution? Pure science without the distraction of controversy.

Refreshing to see Dawkins get to talk with someone who's also intelligent

@kirapoodle

6 жыл бұрын

Yeah but not in this video.

@beertop41beer

5 жыл бұрын

wow you are a good exsample of stupid is as stupid was

@darrenevans1852

5 жыл бұрын

He must be speaking of the time he spoke to Neil Tyson

@ScienceSatish

5 жыл бұрын

Stephen Yin it's an interesting thought.

@dicktrickle875

5 жыл бұрын

typical religious response (meant for David btw)

I love Richard Dawkins

Great interview. Very respectful and well-mannered.

Being wrong in science is suppose to happen, it's part of the scientific process of finding what is true.

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

But why do so many people try to dogmatically force their opinions on others in the name of science which is supposed to be the free enterprise of inquiry? Why does Dawkins try to militantly promote atheism when he’s an advocate of free thought? Why does he try to say that any one who opposes him necessarily is wrong? Because his beliefs are no longer in the realm of science but in the realm of religion. A thought directed to everyone watching this video.

@MrDaiseymay

Жыл бұрын

There in lies it's strength. Science NEVER claims to know all the answer's---yet ! but the god botherer's claim that God does.---without proof.

we are all africans

@danpt2000

9 жыл бұрын

Why did H. Sapiens evolve in Africa and not Asia, Europe from Homo Erectus?

@WarwickkkT101

9 жыл бұрын

danpt2000 Don't be too disappointed.

@danpt2000

9 жыл бұрын

WarwickkkT101 why do you assume I'm disappointed?

@WarwickkkT101

9 жыл бұрын

danpt2000 Homo Erectus is a species like us that is an offset of the homo genus. Sapiens and Erectus share an ancestor but we can't evolve from them.

@danpt2000

9 жыл бұрын

WarwickkkT101 so what species did the African Homo Sapiens evolved from?

i would love to come out as atheist but i am hindu in india and intolerance is increasing fast here.

@rumpestillskin4671

4 жыл бұрын

You have my vote.

@rumpestillskin4671

4 жыл бұрын

@@quanitaatkinson834 Great advice, well said Quanita.

@ramanasai6150

4 жыл бұрын

Dude I am Indian and atheist

@zerefdragneel661

4 жыл бұрын

Indian atheist here buddy!! You really shouldn't give a shit about what others think about you

@rumpestillskin4671

4 жыл бұрын

@@ramanasai6150 That is awesome !!

We're all Africans..so, commiting racism is like insult all of us.

My hero, Richard Dawkins. If only the religious would give him a serious listen. I've encountered some who simply refuse to hear him. How sad.

@MrDaiseymay

Жыл бұрын

They fear ''Gods''s wrath, and there in lies the root of all subservience.

Christine O' Donnell probably thinks that evolution works like in Pokemon.

@werwerqweqwe

4 жыл бұрын

@K Chandra Prakash Hahahahahahahaha

@talosq7982

4 жыл бұрын

K Chandra Prakash I think you’re just interested in what happened to to Malaysian airlines lol

@MrRazorblade999

4 жыл бұрын

@K Chandra Prakash Nice try troll

@AmanExplorerBoy

4 жыл бұрын

@K Chandra Prakash fuck off please

@davidbanner6230

3 жыл бұрын

@@AmanExplorerBoy Ah! Richard, after all this time you have finally got around to facing the real question which you and your compatriot Atheists have been avoiding for so many years. That question is ‘’why should religion and faith not be just as much a vital part of evolution as Ducks and frogs having webbed feet to survive. “Now you can get your secretary to start typing out the next book with this your latest revelation. Yet the reason you haven’t dared to face such a truth is because, along with all the other Atheists you have known that such an admission would end much of your book signing and lucrative lecture tours forever. Placing your Atheism, and much of your claimed expertise in the ‘’SOLVED’’ BASKET.’’

You don't believe evolution. You either understand it or you don't. It remains proven in either case. I don't understand Fermat' s last theorem, but it has been proven.

@johnking5174

5 жыл бұрын

Well said

@paulk9188

5 жыл бұрын

Non-biogenesis just doesnt happen and life defys entropy..when bowling balls roll uphill thats when molecules will self-arrange into unstable molecules and genetic codes and trillion cell animals ..its like thinking sand and limestone and iron ore and water will defy their present chemical stability and spontaneously form a concrete and steel building “The intelligent layman has long suspected circular reasoning in the use of rocks to date fossils and fossils to date rocks.” [ J.E. O’Rourke, American Journal of Science 1976, 276:51] “It cannot be denied that from a strictly philosophical standpoint geologists are here arguing in a circle. The succession of organisms has been determined by a study of their remains embedded in the rocks, and the relative ages of the rocks are determined by the remains of organisms that they contain.” Rastall, R. H., “Geology,” Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. 10 (1949) University of London. P. 168 “Paleontologists cannot operate this way. There is no way simply to look at a fossil and say how old it is unless you know the age of the rocks it comes from.”[date the fossil by the rock] Eldredge, Niles “The rocks do date the fossils, but the fossils date the rocks more accurately. Stratigraphy cannot avoid this kind of reasoning if it insists O’Rourke, J. E Evolution is based on two faulty assumptions: 1. mutations make something new and 2. natural selection makes it survive and take over the population. Evolution is a religion of death not life. “No matter how numerous they may be, mutations do not produce any kind of evolution.” Pierre-Paul Grasse, Evolution of Living Organisms 1977, p. 88 *They rearrange existing information but do not increase genetic complexity * . “In all the reading I’ve done in the life-sciences literature, I’ve never found a mutation that added information. . . . All point mutations that have been studied on the molecular level turn out to reduce the genetic information and not increase it.” Lee Spetner, Not By Chance!: Shattering the Modern Theory of Evolution (Brooklyn, N.Y.: Judaica Press, 1997), 131, 138. “Natural selection may have a stabilizing effect, but it does not promote speciation. It is not a creative force as many people have suggested.” Daniel Brooks “A downward Slope to Greater Diversity,” Science, Vol. 217, 24 September 1982, p. 1240 “Natural selection can act only on those biologic properties that already exist; it cannot create properties in order to meet adaptational needs.” Parasitology, 6th ed. Lea & Febiger, p. 516. Survival of the fittest does not explain the arrival of the fittest! By the way: “Survival of the fittest” is a tautology. Q. Why did it survive? A. Because it is the fittest. Q. How do you know it is the fittest? A. Because it survived. ^ circular reasoning if survival of the strongest or fittest was real, then humans would'nt even exist today. There are many animals in the animal kingdom much stronger and fitter than the average human. or even the strongest human. if you find a fossil in the dirt, all you know is it died. you can't prove it had any kids, and you sure can't prove it had different kids

@count69

5 жыл бұрын

It is not proven, and it is barely a theory. 'Evolution' contains a number of elements, with varying degrees of evidence proposed to them.

@gf2883

5 жыл бұрын

Paul K Paul K the age of a rock is determined by measuring the relative amounts of radioactive decay products in the rock sample to their parent material (the decay products accumulate at a known rate). From this ratio and the decay rate, you can easily determine how old the rock is. This technique is called radiometric dating. So everything you said about circular reasoning of geologists is flat wrong. Sorry man, I’m not trying to be rude but you really need to know that. Also, I think you said something like evolution falsely assumes that mutations lead to changes. Evolution does not assume that. Who told you that?... Most mutations have either no effect on phenotype or a negative effect (in which case the organism is less likely to survive in its particular environment). Over time, whole populations of organisms accumulate and pass on beneficial mutations, so their phenotypes change to make them better suited to survive and reproduce in their environment. I didn’t exactly read all of your referenced quotes, but I did see one that said something like: I have not seen a mutation that adds “information” to the organism. What on earth does that mean? Finally, in regard to your argument that humans shouldn’t have even survived based on natural selection because they are way weaker than other animals on the African savannah. I’ll challenge that argument... Sure, I’ll grant that a single human is really weak compared to other animals. But what important ability do we have that none of the other animals have?.. The ability to communicate complex thoughts through language! This allowed us to build effective tools, coordinate hunts and easily bring down animals that are much bigger, stronger, and dumber than us... Hopefully that example can help you see that fitness is not simply about individual brute strength.

@gf2883

5 жыл бұрын

count69 here are the “elements” of evolution: 1. Every time DNA replicates, there is a small chance that the replication enzymes will make a mistake (i.e., mutation) and produce a new strand with a slightly different sequence. 2. Mutated DNA will either lead to 1) no effect on the organism’s likelihood to survive or reproduce in its environment (i.e., fitness), 2) a negative effect, or 3) a positive effect. 3. Mutations that lead to increased fitness are more likely to be passed down to future generations, so over time a population of organisms will accumulate mutations. Mutations that lead to decreased fitness are less likely to be passed down, so these mutations tend to not accumulate in populations over time. Mutations that don’t affect fitness have neither an increased nor decreased likelihood of being passed down to future generations. These are really the basic features of evolution. They have been observed time and time again... That is really what science is all about: finding explanations of natural phenomena that reliably explain observations. And in that regard, the theory of evolution is on par with the theory of gravity. They both explain their respective natural phenomena with high reliability.

Love Dawkins. We need more people like him

@marcob9124

2 жыл бұрын

Why? He is lying more then most others - so why do you want more people who spread lies and abuse kids (his own judgement). This man is a professional liar and deceiver, so what do you mean with your comment? You want MORE people like him so that you can swallow more of the lies? I dont understand you!

@keel5626

2 жыл бұрын

@@marcob9124 You're a prime example of being derailed from reality

@marcob9124

2 жыл бұрын

@@keel5626 hi Keel, that's a subjective statement and i welcome your search for truth. Do you have a littlr time to give an argument! I mean there is some entertainment in exchanging some statements but i would prefer a bit of meaning, virtue, argument. Thx. Its easy, just quote me and ad your critic/refutation.

@charlestonianbuilder344

2 жыл бұрын

@@marcob9124 pls try debunking scientific research without referring to a bible which has no correlation to whatever scientific research i give you, aka the one they talk about in the vid, the lizard -evolving- to adapt into the new environment it was placed in in a couple decades

@marcob9124

2 жыл бұрын

@@charlestonianbuilder344 Hi Charlestonian, good to see you in search for truth again! Appreciate it much! You: "pls try debunking scientific research without referring to a bible which has no correlation to whatever scientific research i give you,..." >>> I mentioned the bible? Are you sure you mean me? >>> Please give me the research you have in mind and I will be happy to have a look at it. If you dont give me one I cant refute it, right? You: "..aka the one they talk about in the vid, the lizard evolving to adapt .. >>> Sorry to interrupt you, but has it evolved or has it adapted? Adaptation is when you have a feature in the genome that is beneficial in changing environment and will be promoted by the known and understood principles of natural selection. Whats not there cant be promoted. So you (by faith in the content of the vid) claim that the lizard did actually evolve - which means that they received by random mutation or copying errors in the early hours/days of growing life form a new feature which was not there before. I would be happy if you can give me the theory how that would be done by random events. I am simply suggesting here that you know something of how much information is needed for a protein or a cell. So I am highly interested in that case how new traits actually came into this world. Thats something like white mice getting somehow color over some decades..... I mean are you sure you believe what you have heard and seen? Or is it rather that the lizard was promoted with different features then he was using in the past where they have had no advantage? You: "....the lizard "evolving" to adapt into the new environment it was placed in in a couple decades. >>> I think I answered it in well understandable terms . Your turn please.

" Good people do good things, Bad people do bad things. It takes religion to make good people do bad things" I am unable to remember the source if this quote but how true.

@itheangel8817

6 жыл бұрын

michael rimmington I think that quote is from the documentary version of the god delusion

@sambhrantagupta3522

6 жыл бұрын

Its from physicist steven weinberg

@isorokudono

5 жыл бұрын

Religion is taking care of widows and orphans, even bad people do that I'm sure.

@radhakrishnanvadakkepat8843

5 жыл бұрын

It is true

@josephconstant7443

5 жыл бұрын

"It takes religion to make good people do bad things" especially Roman Catholicism, I must add.

I loll'd at the end. "Shit floats"

Long live sir , Greetings from India ❤️ Bloody atheist 👍

Bill hit the nail on the head. The religion is just a form of dogma. Dogma is the problem be it Christianity, Stalinism, flat-eartherism and so on. Logic and reason need to be our compass, not blind dogma.

We all are Africans. Awesome. 👍✌

@jpturner9452

5 жыл бұрын

Races evolved differently though. It's obvious and plain to see

@areez22

5 жыл бұрын

@@jpturner9452 Yes.

@yahulwagoni4571

5 жыл бұрын

No, we are not. Different race, or breed, if you will.

@areez22

5 жыл бұрын

@@yahulwagoni4571 Different races and sub-races and more divisions even further.

@xxsaruman82xx87

5 жыл бұрын

@@jpturner9452 It's only due to migration. Those who travelled north became paler skinned to compensate for the lack of sunlight. Humans need sunlight to begin the synthesis of cholesterol to Vitamin D. The more melanin (pigment) in the skin, the harder it is for the body to absorb the sunlight. Therefore people in areas with less sunlight have paler skin, in order to absorb more when the sun is actually out.

I went out in my yard and looked at a tree for six whole minutes. I concluded that trees do not grow.

@neilarmstrongsson795

2 жыл бұрын

Evolution = just add millions of years and magic things happen.

@MrDaiseymay

Жыл бұрын

@@neilarmstrongsson795 Quite so, tell him to be a bit more patient. Oh and tell him, his dad didn't go to the Moon.

@neilarmstrongsson795

Жыл бұрын

@@MrDaiseymay I'm well aware that my dad never went to the moon.

I've spent over a year dealing with the depression I talked to you about, I told you it was a clinical depression caused by a neurochemical catalyst, that depression is 100% curable, but it can also be as severe as "the emotional based kind". All my diagnoses, 4 of them, state that I did suffer from such condition. There's depression caused by an emotional outsider factor, there's chronic depression, the one you can't cure, and the one directly tied to serotonin changes, I had the last one.

While growing up in Bombay (Mumbai now), we had a neighbour in an apartment above us who became mentally ill at some point. He regularly threw his faeces wrapped up in a newspaper out of his window onto the courtyard below. Ah, memories...

Thanks to Nightwish I got to know Richard Dawkins and I am ever so grateful! I am reading 'The greatest Show on Earth' now (I actually just read the lizard-part) and I have learned so much already. I too was in religious schools (christian in my case) and was never taught anything about the evolution theory. Thanks to Richard Dawkins I also got to know Christopher Hitchens and they both are and will be true heroes. By the work they did they will live on forever. In Dutch there is a song that says 'I have laid a stone in the water and its course will never be the same again'. This is what Richard Dawkins and Christopher (and many others) have done for mankind.

@2fast2block

2 жыл бұрын

How nice you love being stoooo-pid too. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJ2B09yHj7y5iLg.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iWWTraePkabfkaQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4ttycOwqr2yo84.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/lpiV07WupNebkdo.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzread.info/dash/bejne/imuclKqQk7fdkZc.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/

@themplar

Жыл бұрын

Such a good song. Based on your name and the fact you went to a religious school. Bijbelbelt ergens?

"and the people who say evolution is not real, because we can't see it." We can't see creation happening, so I guess that means creation isn't real either.

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

I don’t see any evolution happening but I do see regression happening. Judge for yourself if what I say is true.

@BedsitBob

2 жыл бұрын

@@allanliang9072 I take it you mean regression, in people's behaviour?

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

@@BedsitBob the world is in a state of regression which is evident in the condition of global affairs which we are all aware of. I simply cling on to the hope that regression is not infinite but at some point, all things are going to take a turn for the better. Indeed, I believe in the evolution of the human race to become a better version of ourselves such that we may be rid of our present faults. I contend that we share in same hope. Let us not lose hope in humanity even in these dire times. Peace brother.

@BedsitBob

2 жыл бұрын

@@allanliang9072 When scientists talk about evolution, they're talking about *biological* evolution.

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

@@BedsitBob I think we all want to know the truth and we should test everything we’ve been told including the theory of evolution.

This is the only time I’ve ever seen Bill Maher not interrupt someone constantly. Thx bill for shutting up.

@High_Priest_Jonko

Жыл бұрын

Bill has a lot of respect for Richard; he realizes Richard is way smarter than him, at least in science.

Dawkins is the only guy I've seen looking good while doing self-advertisement

@martinet1985

4 жыл бұрын

@K Chandra Prakash shut the fuck up you fucking imbecile!!! sorry for the harsh words! :)

@AmanExplorerBoy

4 жыл бұрын

@K Chandra Prakash fuck off

I love his tie!

@TonyEnglandUK

5 жыл бұрын

It evolved from an Ebay tie he bought for £3.75.

@Lilacrosepetalleaf

5 жыл бұрын

He got a cool flamingos one also 😌

@marcusrietmann3339

4 жыл бұрын

His wife makes his ties.

Not knowing if there is an afterlife is both terrifying and comforting.

@Penland1234

Жыл бұрын

97 Dark 3 Light. 97 JDNA. 3 DNA. This comforts me.

Instead of throwing poop, humans throw metaphorical poop. We shit post to throw poop and humiliate each other

I loved that closing statement.

I can't really say when I stopped believing but it took at least 20 years of reading, studying religion, and science. Belief systems die hard in some of us. I'm 69 years old now

@paulmillbank3617

5 жыл бұрын

Jeffrey Phillips I take my hat off to you Jeffrey. I can't imagine how difficult it would be to leave a worldview, I was not born into a theistic family and I'll never know what that's like.

@MyDavidlynch

5 жыл бұрын

Whether you believe in Jesus Christ ..His story of of hope faith and charity and love for your fellow man Resounds As goodness for mankind ....

@samshambles391

5 жыл бұрын

Do you feel like you've lost anything?

@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504

4 жыл бұрын

Jeffrey Phillips The devil got the better of you in the end then?

I love Dawkins

The statement that an atheist has no reason to kill someone has to be one of the most illogical statements ever

what the planet needs is a "cleanse"

I love the fact that Bill Maher could make Richard Dawkins laugh. that ought to show everyone that Richard has a great sense of humor. but he should still be taken seriously.

@stephenwright8824

2 жыл бұрын

Nice way to argue for people taking Prof. Dawkins seriously. Did you forget a _not,_ kemo sabe?

Primate life in the trees safe from grounded predators caused the evolution of the agility and dynamic brains(and hands) that have made humanity so powerful. I understand evolution and I also know spirituality to be real. My brother and I both enjoyed Sir Dawkins' book "The Selfish Gene" in our youth... and Dawkins is still on top of it. Yes, "We are all Africans."

Thank god (and I mean that figuratively) atheism is totally normal, common, and accepted in Australia

at last I got to shake his hand on Friday 25th 2018 and also got my God Delusion hardback signed in his own hand. Great Man 🌞💕

@davidbanner6230

3 жыл бұрын

Ah! Richard, after all this time you have finally got around to facing the real question which you and your compatriot Atheists have been avoiding for so many years. That question is ‘’why should religion and faith not be just as much a vital part of evolution as Ducks and frogs having webbed feet to survive. “Now you can get your secretary to start typing out the next book with this your latest revelation. Yet the reason you haven’t dared to face such a truth is because, along with all the other Atheists you have known that such an admission would end much of your book signing and lucrative lecture tours forever. Placing your Atheism, and much of your claimed expertise in the ‘’SOLVED’’ BASKET.’’

Love Richard :D

Hoping you are doing well Richard, I know it has been exhausting for you to reach out. And that it is hard work. But, your hard work helped me see the absurdity of a literal Adam and Eve.

@helenhollis3984

3 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGodWith all due respect, please fuck off.

@helenhollis3984

3 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod You need help. Your comment is not deleted. What are you accusing me of? Why?

@helenhollis3984

3 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod sharing with Homeland Security

@therealzilch

3 жыл бұрын

@@helenhollis3984 Wow, so much for the civilizing effects of religion. But to be fair, there are also atheists who are crude and rude. Sucks to be them. Good on you. Cheers from sunny Vienna, Scott

@helenhollis3984

3 жыл бұрын

@@therealzilch Scott, if you want fair, try posting anything in North Korea! I am ecstatic that religious people talk the way they do. Let the world see their hypocricy.

actually salt water and fresh water do not mix (instantly and without energy)... 2 reasons for this, first density and second osmosis (as far as i am aware of). Salt water is more dense and osmosis isent an instant process. You can try this at home by putting a fresh water ice cube in a glass of salt water, and at the end just add ever so slightly a drop or two of food die.

@sernovate8633

4 жыл бұрын

Alex Crnojacki Who said anything about instantly and without energy?

The i hear the Audience's playing and placing sounds but i don't hear the voice sounds from Richard Dawkins and the interviewer .Who is blocking important voice sound and only broadcasting Au audience clap and laugh-laud sounds?thanks.

Wow, I love dawks Necktie :'D

@galbeeyutdmok651

3 жыл бұрын

Its been 10 years, how are you?

I’ve always wondered when and why we became “naked apes”.

@taqqiraja2722

3 жыл бұрын

has to do with persistence hunting and temperature regulation.Check this out : kzread.info/dash/bejne/d2tq2NOlmNConMY.html

Long live freedom and democratic communes

So what are advantages or disadvantages of one or the other (what is the purpose of these arguments)?

@robertsparling

2 жыл бұрын

I think that it is better to teach people truths rather than untruths. It is better to make decisions based upon evidence rather than feelings, or bronze age creation myths.

Saying "Richard Dawkins on evolution" is like saying "Lawrence Krause on astrophysics" and "Stephen hawking on quantum physics.." (I understand what the title meant and I'm only making a joke, no need to get offended)

@MrPicklekvGygA

5 жыл бұрын

Bill Nye on science

@talosq7982

4 жыл бұрын

The Lost Cosmonaut isn’t bill bye more chemistry?

@MrPicklekvGygA

4 жыл бұрын

@@talosq7982 he's actually an engineer

@alanthompson8515

4 жыл бұрын

Matthew Ray Comfort on bananas?

@nupraptorthementalist3306

4 жыл бұрын

@@MrPicklekvGygA Bill Nye is an imbecile.

The logo at the beginning is in serious risk of coming to a grinding halt

what a lovely talk .

Stupidity is the flat tyre of progress.

The error in the quoran comes from the two seas that meet and have slightly different colours so to explain it they say salt and fresh water does not mix. Due to the fact they didn't understand what was going on.

@DotyFuzz

3 жыл бұрын

It still doesn't refute the Quranic verse because it doesn't mention sweet and salt water

@deanmoncaster

3 жыл бұрын

@@DotyFuzz sweet and salt? We're talking about seas not popcorn.

@libansheikh7067

3 жыл бұрын

“He released the two seas, meeting [side by side]; between them is a barrier [so] neither of them transgresses.” That is the quote. That is reletively specific and from 1400 years ago, that is insane (and not even mentioning the hundreds of other facts). The term transgress merely means, that, the salt water cannot take over the other density water. They meet, but Do Not transgress, exactly how the quran states. I understand it was hard for you to understand, but dont make false statements and just falsify the entire religion and quran off a statement which u did not properly understand. All the scholars say this, and if you want to make your own definition of a statement in the quran, you have the right to do so as we we live in a ‘free’ society.

@deanmoncaster

3 жыл бұрын

@@libansheikh7067 here is a little clue into the "skill of God" www.adn.com/science/article/mythbusting-place-where-two-oceans-meet-gulf-alaska/2013/02/05/ The barrier doesn't remain and over time the seas do mix. It's just that 1400 years ago people didn't know enough to know this.

@libansheikh7067

3 жыл бұрын

@@deanmoncaster the article that you read was written to prove that sediment rich rivers and generl ocean water do indeed mix. The quran does not refer to this example as this photo took place in 2010. Alaska and modern day saudi arabia are on different parts of the map. by giving this example, you r assuming that prophet mohhammed saw something similar to that photo and made that verse. "He is the one who has set free the two kinds of water, one sweet and palatable, and the other salty and bitter. And He has made between them a barrier and a forbidding partition." Modern science has discovered that in estuaries, where fresh (sweet) and salt water meet, the situation is somewhat different from what is found in places where two seas meet. It has been discovered that what distinguishes fresh water from salt water in estuaries is a “pycnocline zone with a marked density discontinuity separating the two layers.” The human eye cannot see the difference between the two seas that meet, rather the two seas appear to us as one homogeneous sea. Likewise, the human eye cannot see the division of water in estuaries into the three kinds: fresh water, salt water, and the partition (zone of separation). heres another articlewritten a couple monthsafter than the one u linked www.geologypage.com/2017/11/atlantic-pacific-ocean-not-mix.html read what it says "It’s not two oceans meeting, its glacial melt water meeting the off shore waters of gulf of Alaska. The reason for this strange phenomenon is due to the difference of water density, temperature and salinity of the glacial melt water and off shore waters of gulf of Alaska, making it difficult to mix." this does not contradict wht the quran says because, they become part of the otherbodyof water, butdo not transgress. transgress would refer to a body of water overtaking another,which does not occur.

The fruit flies living on a Sequoia don't "see" the tree change so it is a myth the tree grows?

@rickydarcilover5581

3 жыл бұрын

R. B.L. Ahh, at the great creator of miracles, Jesus, had to curse a fruit tree for not bearing in fruit out of season. One would think that making fruit appear on the tree regardless, would be easier than the bread and fishes story.

@r.b.l.5841

3 жыл бұрын

@@rickydarcilover5581 As you said - just a Story. evolution on the other hand does not need anyone to talk about it for it to exist all the same.

@rickydarcilover5581

3 жыл бұрын

R. B.L. 🤗

that's true.. line when he said keep religion out of politics and even money .. and school

Whether salt or fresh, shit floats.

getting greatest show of earth in a couple of weeks :) can't wait! his videos are great and I'm sure his books are too. I've always been going for atheism and for science for years now but his videos has made me so confident in science, I could walk around the house alone with all the lights off without showing the least bit of worry cause I know nothing paranormal exists.

@brianlaudrupchannel

Жыл бұрын

Was it any good?

I love this guy!!!!!!!

Thanks I agree so refreshing .

5:52 His blood be on us and the heads of our children

Thank you for articulating reality in such a brilliant way Richard....you are an immense human being.

@kimdanielsen4368

5 жыл бұрын

Richard Dawing is in many cases just an arrogant human being.

@Rich7714

2 жыл бұрын

@@kimdanielsen4368 Example, please

no I saw that episode the girl talked about natural phenomena that quran describes that in some place on earth salt water and fresh water don't mix she didn't mean that in general salt water and fresh water don't mix and now I see why edward wilson called richard dawkins a journalist search for that phenomena please

@chewie2055

4 жыл бұрын

Mohamed Shalaby The phenomenon you speak of entails two bodies of salt water...one having a denser level of salt.......do your research

It is sad and infuriating to me how children are taught to be against science today. It isn't that they are not taught science anymore. They are taught contempt for it. In a time we know so much more. Discoveries made daily. These children. are kept in the dark. There is a small window, until about age ten. If a child is not curious, questioning and interested science, they are likely never to be in their life. How many extraordinary minds are we losing?

@meryatathagres1998

5 жыл бұрын

In America you mean. It's not a global phenomenon.

"Every Atheist that kills people is religious" Damn this is what we call LogiCAl ThINkIng.

@deanmullen10 Agreed I'll definitely get around to buying some of his other books in the new year :)

Since when did Richard Dawkins start watching Pokemon?? XD

What he said about the muslim school was false though, the quran does not say that salt and fresh water dont mix but rather mentions on the boundaries that exist in large water bodies i.e oceans and lakes, and that has been scientifically proven that boundaries develop in large water bodies primarily due to the density difference between fresh and salty water and even between salt waters themselves as it has been observed that their exist a clear boundaries between the different oceans

@plung3r

2 жыл бұрын

The guy is a liar and spreading false information to attack religions and Islam.

@robertsparling

2 жыл бұрын

I have most often seen the argument when it is made about estuaries. Yes differences in salinity establish a pycnocline characterized by differences in specific gravity of the waters which can appear persistent. Nevertheless at the point where the water masses meet, there is significant homogenization of the two masses, and eventually, you can't tell what came from where.

Dude, you can say what you want, my diagnoses are there, I had depression, to a severe degree, and I got cured.