REVOLTING PARENTS: LESSONS FROM THE SCHOOLGATES

When American children began remote learning during the pandemic, many parents received the shock of their lives. Rather than a focus on proficiency in reading, maths, and history, many found that lesson content was geared towards issues of race, gender, climate change and other political issues.
In response, groups of protesting parents began raising their concerns in school meetings. They have since been smeared as ‘dangerous authoritarians’ and ‘white supremacists’ by the media - even characterised as ‘domestic terrorists’ by the Biden administration. Despite this backlash, these parents are swinging elections, and forcing schools to change tack on everything from mask mandates to decolonisation.
Is this movement likely to be replicated in the UK? Certainly, groups of parents are now demanding to see the material used in, for example, sex-education lessons, fearful about the promotion of gender ideology. This push led the Department for Education to publicly back parental access to course materials. But are all parental curriculum protests positive? What about those parents who took over the gates at Batley Grammar School forcing a teacher into hiding for showing an image of the Prophet Mohammed in class?
The parent-teacher relationship is clearly under strain. Parents from Boston to Bolton are starting to question how schools are educating their children. But is there a danger that pushy parents, with their own agendas, could determine curriculum content? Or is the lesson from the US that parents should be trusted to safeguard children’s education?
The speakers are:
Yaron Brook
Chairman of the board, Ayn Rand Institute; host, The Yaron Brook Show; co-author, In Pursuit of Wealth: the moral case for finance
Christina Jordan
Commentator on diversity policies; former Brexit Party MEP
Toby Marshall
Film studies teacher; member, AOI Education Forum
Nancy McDermott
Author, The Problem with Parenting: how raising children is changing across America; chapter leader, Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism (FAIR)
Jo-Anne Nadler
Political commentator; campaigner, Don't Divide Us
The Chair is
Christopher Beckett
Religious education teacher, Holy Family Catholic School; writer; educationalist

Пікірлер: 14

  • @markkavanagh7377
    @markkavanagh7377 Жыл бұрын

    Save the children from this bullying madness.

  • @MrLibtard

    @MrLibtard

    Жыл бұрын

    From bullies to "anti bullies" Exact same thing

  • @edwardrinde569
    @edwardrinde569 Жыл бұрын

    So good to hear this!!!

  • @janetdesmith8125
    @janetdesmith8125 Жыл бұрын

    Thank You

  • @dissonantiacognitiva7438
    @dissonantiacognitiva7438 Жыл бұрын

    I would choose the academical weaker school and compensate at home rather than to game my child brainwashed

  • @miriamkivlehan3498
    @miriamkivlehan3498 Жыл бұрын

    If a school has a partisan ethos, whether religious or secular, and a uniform dress-code, and a sex segregation or co-ed categorisation, then its educational objective is already propgandized. The historical convention of policy bias by elite design has never been held up to public scrutiny these past 50yrs. Now that there is policy capture of school ethos and educational curricula by external actors, that challenges those that are extant, then it behoves us to critique the system in its entirety to determine who should be the guardians of pedagogy and how.

  • @Gingerblaze
    @Gingerblaze Жыл бұрын

    1:22:00 and 1:27:43