YOU CAN STILL VOTE FOR THE FUN VIEWERS DIROFREAK KZread CHANNEL VOTE !
VOTING LINK: scorewiz.eu/rsvp/344909/s4j4Z... (you can vote until September 17th)
Schedule :
-announcement video, explaining how the results are calculated and revealing the qualifiers to the final based on the calculations from the semi-finals: Saturday 29th of August 2020 , 21h CET • Neo Eurovision 2020 fi...
-Publishing of the recap video of all songs for the dirofreak youtube channel viewers vote (where YOU will be able to vote for the 25 songs competing) : Thursday 3th of August 2020, 21h CET • RECAP: All the songs p... (blocked in Denmark sadly, cannot fix that)
-Results of the final of Neo Eurovision 2020 - based on broadcaster votes and a selection of jurors : Saturday 12th of August 2020, 21h CET : • Results of the final o...
-Results of the viewers of my youtube channel merged with the "real" results (50/50 weight) , only for fun (it won't change the Neo Eurovision 2020 "official" winner but it will be interesting to watch :p) : Premiere To be determined (ideally on September 19th :p)
What is it about this time? Not only about personal fun
Compiling reliable votes awarded to the 2020 songs, mostly (but not only) from official votings held by the competing broadcasters and make sure every pot gets about equal weight on the voting of the semi-finals and the final to optimize the weight of valid reliable votes in each pot, which is something that not a single other simulation did (otherwise it’s skewed in favour of Pot 2 (with 6 official votes held by the countries of that Pot, you simply cannot simply add every official vote revealed and say that Iceland would have won the real contest)).
Taking into account voting paterns, barely any simulation took voting patterns into account (the only one that tried to do that is « Euroscorer »). I’m using simple methods for this , dividing into « huge pattern » and « big pattern » and applying certain rules from there, because otherwise it’s IMPOSSIBLE to extrapolate past tendencies to the 2020 songs because we don’t have the exact televoting figures for each countries , the only thing we know for each country is the number of points awarded (besides the italian broadcaster that usually reveal the exact televoting figures), which is not enough and simply shows a « pattern », without a way to say exactly that diaspora impacts for example 25% of the televotes from country X to country Y, we simply don’t know .
There is also a Pot 6 made of the Big 5 + The Netherlands (the Spanish and German broadcasters held official votes)