I’ve always enjoyed how much this movie feels like a play.

@emmanuelmondesir1314

4 жыл бұрын

Because so much of the movie is in 1 location and is more dialogue based than actiom based.

@vinceknox4425

4 жыл бұрын

Me too. This is my favorite Tarantino film

@mickroyster6442

4 жыл бұрын

That might be because of it's almost singular location setting and dialogue-run film. Gotta be honest, if someone made a movie accurate, violent Reservoir Dogs play, I'd go see that

@Huy-gn1eo

3 жыл бұрын

fun fact: the script was originally written for a play

@ventrillo9

3 жыл бұрын

@@Huy-gn1eo oh shit, I think you are right.

Literally just watched this yesterday, one of Tarantino’s greatest IMO

@JacksMovieReviews

5 жыл бұрын

Perfect timing!

@user-pw3yd7rd7f

4 жыл бұрын

Yup

@4umata

4 жыл бұрын

I know many will disagree but this is my favourite Tarantino movie

@kapuccinno1163

3 жыл бұрын

@@4umata noone can disagree with your personal favourite

@KungaMatata

3 жыл бұрын

I have it right behind Pulp and Django. It’s way more rewatchable than Basterds or Kill Bill. Jackie, Once and Hateful are also on the same level. So many bangers.

That rehearsal scene on the rooftop was later quoted by underrated filmmaker Tommy Wiseau in his classic 'The Room'.

@samwilliams394

5 жыл бұрын

lol

@byxyro3439

2 жыл бұрын

*the film that changed the world

What does the audience know? versus What do the characters know? No one knows the traitor, but the characters know more since they expirenced the heist, but when mr. orange is revealed, dynamic irony is created, we know more than the characters. Tarintino does this in a lot of his films.

@sahilrawat5325

5 жыл бұрын

you mean, dramatic irony

@psteeg3551

4 жыл бұрын

@@sahilrawat5325 yes but in an "elevated" way. normal dramatic irony would be: the viewers know what the characters know, and then something new is revealed to the audience but not all characters, and then the audience knows more than some of the chracters, resulting in dramatic irony. this is the case in resevoir dogs after mr orange is revealed, however before the reveal, the characters know more than the viewers (instead of knowing the same), so there's an "inverse" dramatic irony before the reveal and normal dramatic irony after

@porkybeans1154

2 жыл бұрын

It’s literally the same in Hateful Eight now that you’ve opened my eyes

@wattsnottaken1

Жыл бұрын

I love dramatic/dynamic irony such an awesome cinema technique

I love how Orange does this slight forward motion after shooting the woman, then repeats the exact same motion after killing Mr Blonde. Like these two actions are related for him. I always thought it was to tell us he was trying to find a way to live with himself.

@JacksMovieReviews

5 жыл бұрын

I love little details like this!

@iancogneato

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, it's a reaction that to me proves he's not in too deep as JMR seems to believe. Orange shooting the woman was simply a reactionary movement due to his shock at being shot and you can see the regret in his eyes when he does it. That to me is less a sign of someone who's completely morphed into a villainous lifestyle and more the sign of someone who's playing the role (albeit he's doing a pretty good job at it) and just realized he took an innocent life. And when he kills Mr. White and reacts in much the same way it does feel to me like his forward motion thing is him still trying to convince himself physically that in this case he had to do it. That's how it reads to me anyways.

@judewakefield7213

5 жыл бұрын

wonder mike I doubt it was written, I imagine you’re right. Sometimes I think we do a disservice to art when we limit ourselves by artist intent. People point at an artist who’s oblivious to a deeper meaning as evidence that there is no deeper meaning which to me is ludicrous.

@onwiththesnow

5 жыл бұрын

Jude Wakefield watched this movie dozens of times and never put the two together. On board with instant regret. The morality in this film is truly a subtle yet huge undertone

People seem to have all sorts of definitions for "psychopath", as it isn't used professionally it's hard to say who is right, but it's usually considered the layman equivalent of anti social personality disorder. Mr White definitely doesn't fit this, due to how he cares for Mr Orange. Psychopaths can barely comprehend the idea of sacrificing themselves for a friend, let alone actually doing it. Mr White has much more of a solider's outlook- he cares strongly about his comrades, but can comfortably kill the enemy. There is clearly one psychopath/sociopath (again, these are really pop psychology terms that don't have an accepted difference)- Mr Blonde. Even then, it's questionable if he's a total psychopath, because Eddie reveals that he stayed loyal and did his time in prison instead of ratting and taking a deal. But you could argue that was in his interest. Probably his most psychopathic act isn't cutting off the cop's ear, it's stopping for fast food on his way back from a heist with a cop in his boot. Total fearlessness.

@alexharvey6522

5 жыл бұрын

Agreed, stopping for a burger is definitely his most psychopathic action

@morganfarrell2442

5 жыл бұрын

I’m glad someone else commented this. And if APD was a factor in Mr. White’s behaviour, it was the cause rather than the effect of his time in prison.

@stevenbrown9224

5 жыл бұрын

Great comment. I totally disagree with the assertion Mr White is a psychopath. White shows lots of compassion and sympathy for Mr Orange, which is something psychopaths aren't capable of. If anyone takes the title of psychopath, it has to be Mr Blonde.

@claytonbigsby381

5 жыл бұрын

mankytoes Agreed mr white shows compassion and psychopaths don’t feel any such thing

@carton9892

5 жыл бұрын

I kind of thought he misspoke and meant blonde is a psychopath and white a sociopath, but given with his actions towards orange I can’t really see that even

Actually, Pink didn't kill Eddie, it was Mr.White. Harvey Keitel's gun just fired before he moved his arm.

@JacksMovieReviews

5 жыл бұрын

There’s some ambiguity. Regardless of how he does, Pink finds a way to make it out alive.

@mankytoes

5 жыл бұрын

Tarantino said he realised the shooting doesn't quite work on camera, but he didn't reshoot to leave it ambiguous and to create a discussion point. So I guess this argument is what he wanted!

@stoniecad7805

5 жыл бұрын

@@JacksMovieReviews this is my new head cannon. Its the only thing that makes sense can't believe I didn't think it could've been Pink who shot Eddie. Woah awesome JMR!

@RottenDoctorGonzo

5 жыл бұрын

You are correct. Mr. White shoots Nice Guy Eddie. There is no "amiguity". White shot Nice Guy. Even the published screenplay says it. If you watch the standoff and watch White, you will see him shoot Eddie.

@inbigchina

5 жыл бұрын

Han shot first.

After Fargo, I wouldn't trust my teammates as Steve Buscemi either.

@bredelisp4908

5 жыл бұрын

spoiler?

@joshuapannell8131

5 жыл бұрын

If people haven't seen it by now there's no hope for them.

@bredelisp4908

5 жыл бұрын

no I mean i haven't watched this lol.

@joshuapannell8131

5 жыл бұрын

Oh, nah it's not a spoiler for this movie.

@joemckim1183

5 жыл бұрын

@@bredelisp4908 Fargo is a 23 year old movie, I don't think that we need to use spoiler tags for it at this point. That's like you having to be afraid to spoil that the Yankees won the 1996 World Series while you're at it.

This movie is a masterpiece. Gotta say, I liked it better than Pulp Fiction!

@gelatnis

5 жыл бұрын

haha not even. to each his own though.

@oldgriffin4944

5 жыл бұрын

@@MCee97 because you don't understand the symbolism and complexity of the film, very few understand it on their first few viewings

@kentbent7306

5 жыл бұрын

Oldgriffin49 yea please elaborate

@cameronm2877

5 жыл бұрын

Miles Chan He doesn’t know shit he’s just trying to seem like some sort of intellectual... welcome to KZread

@mayormccheese2641

5 жыл бұрын

Oldgriffin49 I’ve only seen it once, and I immediately got the appeal the first time. A lot of the symbolism I got too, but I missed a lot too. That makes it a lot more appealing to rewatch. For example, “Martin & Lewis or Amos n’ Andy”?

It's astonishingly clear that MR. WHITE shoots Eddie. Mr. Pink doesn't shoot Eddie. It's there in the film and in the official published screenplay. Jesus Christ.

@joeygonzo

5 жыл бұрын

6:42, yup. Even though it looks impossible

@shanemcfadden6427

4 жыл бұрын

Thank yu, when the narrator said that it stuck out like a sore thumb

@richardrude9087

4 жыл бұрын

RottenDoctorGonzo Thank you, I was about to say that! Pink didn’t kill Eddie. He just dipped with the diamonds💎

@skulltown3131

4 жыл бұрын

It's understandable 2 get that wrong I thought it was Mr pink for a while until I noticed that he gets the 2nd shot off

@skulltown3131

4 жыл бұрын

Andd mr pink does have his gone drawn when he crawls out

Pink makes it out alive...until he goes outside and gets killed by the cops. You can hear it in the background towards the end. I always hoped he made it out alive though.

@curtis8966

5 жыл бұрын

You can hear him giving up, he doesn’t get killed.

@ronienrikey1712

5 жыл бұрын

He did make it out alive but surrendered to the cops. I wish he got away actually.

@EddieMachetti

4 жыл бұрын

M I Yup. We see him outrunning the cops in the beginning. If he can do it once, he can do it again. It’s not impossible that he got away, and went on to do the unthinkable: become a disguised waiter.

@nicktheboss9875

4 жыл бұрын

He does not get killed

@PChamileon97

4 жыл бұрын

Joseph Martinez in the game however has three different endings the worst ending(if you constaintly get Psycho Rank in EVERY mission) has Pink and two cops engage in a shootout before Pink tags one of them before getting shot himself. As he reached for the gun, the second cop came and shot him a few times in the head. Pink-DECEASED The Cannon ending(if you get a couple PSYCHO but most PROFESSIONAL) has him try to drive off, but the cops shoot out the windshield and wound Pink, causing him to fall out of the car but the cops handcuff him Pink-ARRESTED the best ending(Get PROFESSIONAL on EVERY Mission) has him dropping the diamonds, but manages to slip past the cops and drives off in a cop car Pink-ESCAPED

Mr. Pink is absolutely the protagonist, IMO. It's a classic antihero film, and Mr. Pink is the consummate professional.

@tareklegrand7747

3 жыл бұрын

Reservoir Dogs is not "classic antihero film" it's a film that says "fuck the rules of writing ! we do what we want" . there is no protagonist everybody is the hero of his own story juste like in ..... real life . Mr orange view himself as the good guy because he's a cop he fights criminals who are bad guys but in Joe's point of view he's just a sneaky little bastards who sold them out . Mr. White views Mr. blonde as a crazy psychopath and nothing more but in Nice Guy Eddie's point of view Blonde is a brave man who spent years in jail for his father . as for Mr. Pink he thinks he's the only useful man in the job surrounding by idiots , psychose and traitors which makes him a protagonist in his head just like .... everyone .

@tiaaaron3278

23 күн бұрын

How is Pink the protagonist? He gets little screentime, has little to no development or history and then gets caught and shot. Mr. White is the closest to a protagonist in this movie. He gets the most screentime and emotional buildup along with Mr. Orange, he's an open book we read and his character is reminiscent of ruthless noir leads. Mr. White is the protagonist while Mr. Orange is the deuteragonist. Everyone else is secondary.

Interesting perspective on seeing each character with a different kind of dissorder, reminds me of all those Whinney the Pooh theories. Also nice editing in this video.

@JacksMovieReviews

5 жыл бұрын

Very much appreciated! I'll have to look into the Winnie the Pooh theories!

@_Azagoth_

5 жыл бұрын

The theory goes that each character represents a different mental illness. I don't know all the details, it's a long time since I've read into them, but they're very interesting.

'Mr Orange' aka 'Agent Orange' I really like how Tarantino's mind works ! So cool..

@Fer_Ramorino

4 жыл бұрын

The funny thing is, there is a Mr. Blue, and one would think the name would've foreshadowed who the undercover cop was. I wonder why Tarantino would let something like that slip by. Too on the nose, maybe?

@dumbboi4783

4 жыл бұрын

Fernando Ramorino Yeah, too on the nose. Someone would easily be able to identify that Roth was the traitor if his name was Mr. Blue.

I loved the dialogue and acting in this film.

I like your analysis of the film, but I disagree with all of the attempts (that you brought up) to diagnose the characters. Mr White, for instance, is absolutely not a psychopath. Whites feelings for Orange is the whole reason everything goes to s#!t. He just met the guy on this job and already he feels strongly enough for him to be willing to kill his old friends to protect him (even though it pains him, so much). That relationship is everything in this movie - I'm surprised you didn't get into that in greater detail. But good job, overall!

@JoseLopez-gi9sf

7 ай бұрын

None of them were friends. Now Mr. Blonde was loyal to the boss but not friends. White only got attached because they both shot their way out together. Everyone went different ways and they ended up together. Kinda like how someone fall in love with someone else when they are saved by them. Even if it is a simple thing like thank you and I appreciate you. He got attached and was hired to do a job. None of them knew each other for the most part. Which is why they were given names. White was the first to say something after the job went south because he was sick of the name thing. He thought Pink would agree since he was sick of the name thing from the start. That's why it should have been easier to do a job together and not attached. But seeing a colleague shot right in front of you changed that. Mr. White was probably of an older generation where your coworkers go down with you and you do anything for them. It is not a loyalty to the boss but more that they fight and die together. That way nobody snitches if they get pinched either. He can't reason with Blonde but can with orange. So he trust him more and almost trusted Pink. The boss isn't someone you trust more because they just pay you for a job. Which he knew so that is also why he trusted the coworkers more. Besides Blonde because he was closer to the boss. The problem here is you don't know who is telling the truth like Mr. Pink says. Mr. Blonde could have done his stay in the joint but also flipped inside the joint possible given the option of a new life. The cops where also incompetent for allowing them to do the job when they where armed and around people. As soon as the cops couldn't handle the situation at the bank. They should have left them go and just followed them to the hide out. Instead they go out blasting and running after them. They also should have never tried to get them there at all and waited until everyone was at the hideout including the boss.

@tiaaaron3278

23 күн бұрын

His "analysis" of Mr. Orange was atrocious too. He's the only beacon of morality in the movie exactly because he stayed true to himself till his mission was done.

@tiaaaron3278

23 күн бұрын

​@@JoseLopez-gi9sfthey are friends actually. Freddy even notes Joe and Mr. White are very close and Joe calls him "junior" in flashbacks. Pink says he's known since he was a child. Vic is familiar with the family. Mr. White's only other attachment was to Mr. Orange. He didn't care when Mr. Brown died. He was ready to throw hands with Mr. Pink over Orange. It's clear White and Orange have the most significant relationship that's different from everyone else.

@Ebbagull

23 күн бұрын

@@tiaaaron3278 100% agree. And thank you for bringing me back to a comment I made five years ago!😊

Tim Roth (Mr. Orange) unloads a whole round into Blonde without blinking once. Not a lot of actors can't do that!

@Elcoonn

3 жыл бұрын

Huh

@porkybeans1154

2 жыл бұрын

@@Elcoonn Tim Roth actually shot Michael Madsen, and he was pronounced ded on the scene, it’s CGI they use in Hateful Eight

Go at 09:27 and set the speed 0.25, you can clearly see: 1-Joe shoots mr.Orange, 2-mr.White shots Joe, 3-Eddie shoots mr.White, 4-Mr.White shoots Eddie... Mr.Pink isn't involved in this.

@porkybeans1154

2 жыл бұрын

Eddie fires two shots so I’m wondering if he missed the first shot

"I can't believe she fuking killed me!"

He shot a woman who shot him in self defense, the look on Orange's face was instant regret. And Mr. Pink did not kill Nice Guy Eddie, Mr. White did.

@greatest_bumble_bee_dude

2 жыл бұрын

Most likely mister white did shoot towards Eddie though, pretty sure that can also see a flash coming from either mister oranges gun or perhaps even mister pinks firearm pistol weapon 🔫 Can see mister pinks gun 🔫 in his own personal life right hand just before he goes to grab the black bag before fleeing the crime scene

@greatest_bumble_bee_dude

2 жыл бұрын

Also :I'm not even sure if mister white got to kill mister orange

@TonyG8992

2 жыл бұрын

@@greatest_bumble_bee_dude He did, shot him in the head, seconds later he gets gunned down by police

@greatest_bumble_bee_dude

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah maybe though, it also sounds like the gun was empty as can hear 3 clicks after the cops 👮 💂 🚓🚔 stormed the building so basically even if he squeezed the trigger it doesn't necessarily mean that he killed the undercover cop but, I'm not too sure about it all anyways as haven't watched the film in yonks only going by uploaded youtube videos clips

Way off with theories about Mr. Orange's "disorder" and that bit about "Agent Orange" is hilarious, other than that good analysis.

Everytime when I get my hair cut I listen to "Stuck in the Middle with You" and it's hilarious.

A "two-act" film that fits perfectly into a three-act structure. ACT 1 introduces the natural world/characters and asks the question who is the rat? Act 1 ends with officer in the trunk complication and the fact that they have to wait for Joe Cabbot. (this is an important detail -- you really don't get an answer as to who the rat is -- but you're locked into the narrative which is essentially going to be answering the question: who is the rat? and we have a ticking clock with Joe Cabbot... All of act 2 focus' on revealing who each of the characters are (this makes perfect sense when you think about the title -- it's not a movie named after the failed heist it's a movie named after it's characters). The midpoint of the 2nd act we get a not-so-shocking moment with mr.blonde almost killing the cop... The real stakes raising moment actually happens moments later when he's killed by Mr. Orange revealing Tim Roth to be the rat. Now the tail end of ACT 2 is giving us all the answers about the rat/undercover cop up to his "dark night of the soul" where he kills the woman in self-defense making him a reservoir dog like the rest of them (on some existential/philosophical level). ACT 3 actually begins with the results of all this back at the warehouse (eddie returns) -- stakes are further raised when the cop is killed - Joe Arrives and everyone is at each others throats. The reason this gets called 2-act film is because it doesn't have an epiloguey ending - but I think the film is over and all questions are answered because the hiest is a mcguffin and the real story is character driven with mr.orange/mr.white having a tragic father/son moment. At least this is the way I've already interpreted the story.

Really great and thorough dissection of Tarantino's first feature film! Love this movie. It has a fantastic cast, the few locations and props look just right (Tarantino went for quality, not quantity) and there is Andrzej Sekula's wonderful cinematography. I know it is just my personal taste, but this was all shot on my favorite film stock ever: Eastman EXR 50D, Super 35mm film - and it looks absolutely gorgeous here. The film stock certainly helps a ton making the sets, props and lighting (this film stock needs a LOT of light, so all scenes inside the warehouse had a lot of lighting, yet they don't look flat or cheap at all) look the best they can. Thanks, as always, for sharing your great insight. I never fully understood the color coding of the main characters, but I'm glad you shed some new light on it - as well as their psychology!

@JacksMovieReviews

5 жыл бұрын

It does a great job doing a lot with very little

There is only but one hero in this movie, the waitress. The only hardworking, and honest person around. Works extremely hard to support herself and her family! All the other characters are villains.

Awesome video! Incredibly thorough breakdown and analysis of the characters and structure. Reservoir Dogs is one of my favourite movies ever. Thanks so much for making this :)

The real star of the movie is that song, though. Little green bag. Took me a long time to find out it's sung by a Dutch guy.

I loved this essay soo muuuch!!! Srsly! This is one of my favorite movies.

One of my favourites! So well crafted. And Steeler's Wheel? Best choice. I used to work in a warehouse. Each time I walked out into the quiet, that would run through my head.

I have to congratulate you, this video is one of the best film analyses I've seen on youtube, you deserve more views

As usual, when I watch one of your reviews I always want to go back and see the movie again. So, now I'm gonna see where I can find "Reservoir Dogs" online to watch again. Great review.

it's interesting how a nonlinear structure can make a good and simple story more complicated and interesting

Now I gotta rewatch this movie. Well done!

I’ve been saying this is the best movie ever for a long time because the simple story that lets the characters shine.

Great dialogue, very relatable and easy to listen to. Great work.

I was explaining the genius of this movie to someone the other day. It absolutely messes with your moral compass in the best way. I love the dynamic between Orange and White

Your videos are so great man! I eagerly wait for every video.. Thanks a bunch!

@JacksMovieReviews

5 жыл бұрын

Very much appreciated!

Greatly edited, as always, and a great video overall.

I just watched it and that ending is not what I expected. It's so good.

First time i watched this movie was back in 1995, i rented the VHS tape from Blockbuster and Took it home, i didn't know anything about the movie, i had been hearing about Tarantino and Pulp Fiction, but since that was not available i took this movie, after the Opening scene and opening Credits i Immediately rewound the movie back to the Beginning, i had to watch this again, and after the movie was over i rewound it all and watched it a second time, after that i told everyone i could find you got to see this.

Even before I start this video, I know that this will be a thorough and comprehensive look at an incredibly underrated and damn near perfect genre film of the most experimental kind. My thanks, in advance.

I watched it a few days for the first time and now i want to rewatch it Great video

That’s interesting about the Mr. Orange/Agent Orange comparison. I never thought about it in that way. And with the psychopath/sociopath comparison. I’ll have to watch this movie again with all of this in mind. Great video!

Of all the movies I have seen over the last 50 years, this is my favorite. Never considered anything other than it is a movie with great dialogue. After your analysis I will see the movie in a whole other light.

Wasn't expecting such a professional, astute review on yt; my compliments. Saw this before Pulp Fiction came out, my buddy and I watched it 50 times, knew every line of dialogue but even so in 1993 all I noted was some name dropping (Honey West/"I bet you're a big Lee Marvin fan), not what has be- come Quentin's patented imbuing his movies with his personal adoration of movies. Your review, Jack, helps shift Dogs into perspective. To those who saw Quentin's first movie when it first appeared there were no cliches yet or familiar Tarantino tropes. As much as I liked Pulp, I like this better. QT's yet to top these two. Thanks again for your intelligent insights.

Fantastic video essay, I enjoyed the analysis greatly

The true mystery and crime of Reservoir Dogs is what the hell is up with the end credits song.

I loooooove how you use songs from the movie's score 🤩

Good stuff again!!! I truly think this one is my fav out of Tarantino's catalogue

Id watch this movie again and agian and AGAIN. Its that good

This is one of the great movies of all time, seriously. Far deeper than it seems on its first viewing, not shown nearly enough in it's time.

@wattsnottaken1

Жыл бұрын

It gets better everytime I re watch it, great movie

Resiviour dogs is my favourite movie ever , it's fucking class

Jack each and every one of your reviews are a steak dinner which make other reviews look like drive through meals. I can't believe that you only have a little more than 80 thousand subscribers. I will recommend you to anyone.

Epic Review.... thanks for being so good.

For every movie he picks the perfect type of music. Xx

Come running every time you put up a new video!

the editing in this video is on another level

This movie has by far the best characters and structure of any Tarantino movie in my opinion, my personal favourite of his.

Congrats 100k !!

Great breakdown - thanks.

Very good! New perspective! THX!

Funny how I like the analysis of this movie more than the movie itself😅 I liked some individual parts of it and especially the visuals(camera work, composition, lighting and an indescribable atmosphere this movie posseses), I also really like the opening with "Little green bag" playing and them walking in slow motion, but the idea of it and the structure (which this video focuses on) is way more interesting and inspiring.

Look i love this film,from what i got.I just felt like it was short,and we didnt see enough of mr blue or mr brown.

That shot with Mr. Pink and Mr. White with their guns pointed at each other is one of the best shot compositions I have ever seen. It shows so much about characters and their conflict. Mr. Pink is a slimy rat-man who fights to survive like an animal and Mr. White is a stoic, strong man who is more traditional and plays by the his codes. Both are in suits covered in blood stained suits because of an outward professionalism yet a actual brutality of the two men.

This is to m3 one of the best movies of all time! I have others but this one is spectacular

Great analysis!!

Okay. A brilliant disection of the film. Multisection? So well put on all points. I will watch this again, (as I will watch the film again). Then a re-watch of "True Romance".

An amazing review! You analyzed this film perfectly. I never knew Mr Pink shot Nice Guy Eddie though. I thought Mr White shot Joe, then White & Eddie shot each other at the same time. But Mr Pink shooting Eddie makes more sense.

this couldn't have been told better well done jack

Amazing definition man ✊🏾

This video mixes up the definition of sociopath and psychopath. Mr. Blonde is the psycho, whereas Mr. White is sociopath. I've also googled the Dr. and the reddit post has him correctly using sociopath and psychopath classification.

I love this film!! I watched it yesterday and I thought it was awesome! One of the greatest Tarantino films

I love the mention of psychopath vs sociopath. I've been learning that recently and really want people to get it right now, lol

I just watched the movie. The dialogs are really good. And the heist itself turns out to get aside by the tension to find who's the cop

Feels less like a mainstream blockbuster and more like some guy got a bunch of his buddies to act in a short film after school. And thats what I like about it.

Such a great movie.

Mr. White is absolutely not a psychopath, psychopath's can't feel emotions for others like he did for Mr. Orange.

the movie that made me realize how a great script can make all the differance

All these comments but i may be the only one who was impressed with a tiny part of the movie so much that i'm still wearing the item. Not the black suits or the white shirts and black ties. Here's what it is…Mr Orange's Ray Ban Clubmaster sunglasses. Damn, those shades are the coolest i have seen, they go as far back as some mid 50’s movies. Yep, thanks for that cool tip Mr Orange/ Taratino!

great job

i wouldn't say it 'holds back' but it saves its violence to maximize its impact, another film that did this succesfully is 'Sicario'.

Great video.

Great work Jack, can you make a video on Upgrade?

Just watching this video reminds me how great tarantino's framing and composition is.

This is my favorite Tarantino film, also really like the theory that they all represent a different type of disorder

amazing video learned a lot

that was great. thank you.

Mr. Pink did get away as far as we’re aware, and he didn’t kill Mr. Orange. Can’t believe that was missed, especially considering it’s my favorite thing.

More videos on Quentin Tarantino’s films porfavor! 🙌🏻

Omg when he brought in the Psychologist I checked out hahaha. Swear a psychologist pumps up everytime there's a popular film to 'diagnose' fictional characters with their bullshit disorders 😂

Interesting interpretation!

Reservoir Dogs is my all-time favorite movie and I'm also a huge Tarantino fan. 💯💯💯💯💯

awesome video sir; might want to check the audio mixing of your background music, however.

The greatest experience is watching Reservoir Dogs at the New Beverly Cinema. Reservoir Dogs is my all time favorite movie

Mr pink also gets away at the end. It’s been confirmed

This is def one of the best movies ever. For a movie about a bunch of guys standing in a room talking, its pretty goddamn good.

Tarantino was inspired by the movie city on fire, was mind blown when I saw city on fire, that era of films is my favorite for sure. Pulp fiction use to be my favorite Tarantino movie but reservoir dogs has taken that spot over time.

Great video - just wish the music was quieter

An interesting comparison for Mr. Blonde is his brother, Vincent, from Pulp Fiction, and how both of them died due to caving into their vices; In Vic's case, it was sadism and bullying, and in Vincent's, it was his heroin addiction. Remember: A symptom of heroin abuse is constipation, and Vincent uses the toilet a LOT.

I think Joe is the central villain of the story. He organizes and facilitates the heist, and while he is not directly responsible for other's actions, everything they do, as well as the events of the entire movie, could not have happened without him. He knowingly allows Mr. Orange on the team, and allows him to wreak havoc between their ranks. Consequentially, The Reservoir Dogs are all protagonists, each dealing with the situation Joe left them in their own ways.