We need your generous support: muslimskeptic.com/contribute

@AbdullahArguer

2 ай бұрын

salam brother daniel

@generalali7609

2 ай бұрын

Governments are built they don’t come out of thin air. The people must want that type of rule in order to enforce it. Even if every one claims to be Muslim. If they don’t want that type of government they won’t have it🤦🏾. You don’t know that’s how the world works right? People have to WILLINGLY agree and implement all of those laws. It CANT be imposed just because you say it’s Islamic.

@bluesky45299

2 ай бұрын

Let’s talk about real religion that is the greatest threat to family unit.liberalism is built upon two ideas: maximum freedom and maximum equality. Both of these ideas are erroneous because human behavior has to be restrictaed for the greater good therefore negating maximum freedom. Maximum equality is not possible due to differences in knowledge which establishes hierarchy. We must subjugate ourselves to law of Allah(one/indivisible/self-sufficient/All-loving perfection)) who has totality of data, therefore being the only one that has the right to legislate.

@chintuz1002

2 ай бұрын

in india, gov will arrest if you use Pakistan flag or support Pakistan in a biggest democratic country so this is similar to blasphemy law?

@user-bx3sx9gt8b

2 ай бұрын

Your teachers have given up you may as well ​@@chintuz1002

Assalamu alaykum brother! Please help raise awareness about the hijab ban in Tajikistan 🇹🇯. The government has banned the wearing of the hijab and is fining and arresting hijabis on the streets. They imprison anyone who publicly disagrees with them, and we literally don't know what to do. Please pray for us and help in raising awareness.

@Ya39oub_G

Ай бұрын

May Allah be with you and make you strong to face these kinds of injustices.

@gameoverfr1

Ай бұрын

@@Ya39oub_G ameen

fake debate. just agreeing on liberalism

Another sad thing to take note of is that Yasir Qahdi is a very popular and widespread voice among American Muslims who don't know about who he really is. Therefore, they still follow his talking points and share his content. We MUST let other Muslims know that he is not to be followed and brother Daniel has already helped by making the videos for us to educate others. Let's do our part.

@Therebelliousprince001

2 ай бұрын

💯

@achm3dz

2 ай бұрын

That's because he is the ideal shaykh who makes every aspect of life easy with regards to the western life by giving his twisted and vague fatwas

@fark69

2 ай бұрын

Tbf to him, it's because he has done some exceptional scholarly work. His seerah series. His series on the battle of Karbala and historical context. These are all pretty well-researched and honest about the facts. His interpretation of Islamic things is lacking for many of us, but he does the hard scholarly work of researching and presenting the facts. That's how he gained an audience, imo. Much of his audience is not as liberal as him, I've noticed

@achm3dz

2 ай бұрын

@@fark69 he cannot change the facts that's why those series are compelling. However, he is an outright reformist and that's the issue. No one ever questioned his seerah series as far as i know. Everybody is calling him out for his nonsense interpretation of the deen with eloquent words

Chapters: 00:00:00 - The Relationship Between Government and Religion in Islam 00:06:26 - Different Paradigms and Societies 00:11:33 - The Role of Religion in Political Systems 00:16:49 - Religious Freedom and Universal Values 00:21:47 - The Responsibility in Islam and Maximizing Freedom 00:27:12 - Critique of American foreign policy and liberalism 00:32:46 - Restricting Religious Freedom for Muslims 00:38:22 - The Freedom of Morality vs. Immorality in Muslim Countries 00:43:41 - Political Values and Ideas 00:48:43 - Persecution and Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan 00:53:32 - The Double Standards of Free Speech 00:58:31 - The Paradox of Political Freedom and the Middle East 01:03:29 - Religious Coercion in Muslim Majority Societies 01:09:04 - The Misogyny of Yas 01:14:18 - The Sharia in the Modern Nation State 01:19:33 - Controversial discussions on Western notions 01:25:13 - The Controversy Surrounding Sharia Law 01:30:23 - The Challenges of Implementing Islamic Law in Modern Society 01:35:59 - The Caliphate and Political Models in Islam 01:41:12 - The Influence of Politics on Religion 01:46:18 - The responsibility of Western powers in preventing genocide 01:51:27 - The Ban on Alcohol in Muslim Society 01:57:12 - Tensions in Muslim Societies 02:02:40 - Common Ground and Differentiation in Religious Values and Government 02:08:22 - Yas as a Scholar 02:13:58 - The Role of Religion in Government 02:19:57 - The Dawa Mafia Scandal

@exactlyloler61

2 ай бұрын

Wouls be useful if tgis comment got pinned

It's amazing how YQ didn't mention a single Quranic verse or hadith in a 2h debate.

@letmespeakthetruth1601

2 ай бұрын

He mentioned a part of 1 ayat, I think..That too to support his liberal ideas.

@SeekerOknowledge

Ай бұрын

Because once he does so he will be bound by Quran other verses otherwise he will fall under Quranic threat; {do you believe in some of the book and disbelieve in some ? .. then what is the punishment for who does this except shamesnes in this life and in the hereafter they turn to the most severe torture}.

Nationalism/tribalism is NOT part of Islam. Islam is THE way of life and life cannot do without politics. Hence politics is a part of Islam.

Being raised in the US and receiving a liberalist education, I am the exact kind of Muslim that is vulnerable to the secularist message. I appreciate this channel for promoting yaqeen of Islam. Jazakallahair.

I just noticed that in the beginning the host is saying "both of them have a desire to cultivate just society". That means the presupposition of both liberal is Islamic society is unjust. That's where their beginning.

This isn’t a conversation between Muslim ideologies. Sound more like Uncle Sam is talking to a Kamalist

Qadhi is a waffler. As a Muslim , Allah is above all things, the Quran is what we judge by and live with,so the Islamic law is above every man made law or way of life.

YQ is speaking like a politician, not as a religious scholar. I advise him to take off his mask and work as an activist instead of confusing laymen Muslims who are following him.

"Show me where it says in the Quran I shouldn't listen to Yasir Qadhi" - average YQ fan

@User_47536

2 ай бұрын

"Pls dont divide the ummah" - Middle ground fallacists

@seekfactsnotfiction9056

2 ай бұрын

@@User_47536 ههههههه الوسطية الإسلام المعتدل That was epic

@SS-kg8qw

2 ай бұрын

@@seekfactsnotfiction9056 Epic Masjid

@singalongme1

2 ай бұрын

(O Prophet), when the hypocrites come to you, they say: “We bear witness that you are certainly Allah's Messenger.” Allah certainly knows that you are His Messenger. But Allah also bears witness that the hypocrites are utter liars! (63:1) for YQ fans.

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended." --- Frederic Bastiat I'm constantly disappointed in YQ.

We have not been harmed by the infidels as much as we have been harmed by the hypocrites within the Muslims

I can't finish watching this video.. Can't stand hearing Yassir Qadhi after I heard him say that invoking saints is NOT shirk..

@MohammedAlSharif2002

2 ай бұрын

He is a deviant. Ibn Taymiyyah says: “So, after knowing what the messenger has come with, we know by necessity that he has not legislated for his nation to call upon anyone from the dead, not the prophets, the righteous ones, or anyone other than them; not in the wording of Isthighatha or other than it, and not in the wording of Isti'anah or other than it. Just like how he has not legislated for his nation to prostrate to the dead, to one that isn't dead, or the likes of that. Rather, we know that he has forbidden us from all these affairs, and this is from amongst the Sh*rk that Allah and his messenger forbade. But due to the increase of ignorance and lack of knowledge of the Athar of the message amongst many of those who came later on, Takf*r can't be done on them until what the mesenger came with becomes clear to them from that which opposes it.” الاستغاثة ٤١١

@shant2464

2 ай бұрын

He has changed his stance on saints. People learn and change for the better.

@miso9788

2 ай бұрын

​@@shant2464@shant2464 In his saint-grave-worship-not- shirk remarks he starts by saying he has changed his position from shirk to not-shirk. So are you saying he's changed again? Is that who you will take guidance from? Might as well join a church.

@Hasan-dy4mk

2 ай бұрын

​@@shant2464do his followers know? Did he make a public apology/retraction?

@mca9128

2 ай бұрын

Whether he changed his opinion or not, this debate proves he doesn't regard the shari'ah as the ultimate and irrefutable law of Allah for him to think of reforming it, astaghfirullah.. There is only 1 Islam wherever you maybe..

Islam is beyond reform. Let us remind Yasir Qadi of what Allah(swt) says about His(swt) religion in the Quran, Chapter 5, Verse 3: "This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islām as religion." Sahih International If Yasir Qadi is not pleased with this statement of Allah(swt), then he should choose another religion or create one.

@fahadmalik8862

2 ай бұрын

Every progressive Muslim needs to hear this. Properly.

Yasir Qadi is such a disappointment. 😔 Ty for exposing his reformer attitude.

20:14 Overthrow of Abdul Hameed was the biggest tragedy for the ummah in the last century. It breaks my heart to hear so called refined turks such as this guy stating the atrocity imposed on them by the western empires so proudly as an accomplishment of his nation state.

@samy7013

2 ай бұрын

You seem to have a very idealized, pedestalized view of the Ottoman Empire. The rot was already far too advanced by 1909 when the Young Turks overthrew Sultan Abdul Hamid II, and in many ways, he was part of the rot. I like to think that maybe if things were a bit different, he might have gotten around to harnessing some of his personal potential towards setting things onto a better path, but as it was, he failed, badly.

@Therebelliousprince001

2 ай бұрын

Well said!

@fahadmalik8862

2 ай бұрын

@@samy7013 I mean Atatürk banned Arabic all together and reading the Qur'an in Arabic

@User_47536

2 ай бұрын

​@@fahadmalik8862 Call him Atajew or Atagay 😂

@fahadmalik8862

2 ай бұрын

@@User_47536 people are mostly blind and celebrate him. He was in no way a good person. And I wonder who banned the Hijab...? That's... Oh YEAH!

According to Yq point of view qawm lut has the right to practice 🏳️‍🌈🤮 Because they all accept it, and the prophet lut didn't have the right to forbid it, and he was even a kharijee

Yasir Qadhi really thinks he's any sort of Mujtahid who came here to "reform" Islām💀

@jahidulislammaruf0726

2 ай бұрын

lol 😂

@DhikrDose

Ай бұрын

He's a scholar who academically studied islam he can put his opinion out there. Why Muslims need to overthink too much?

@jahidulislammaruf0726

Ай бұрын

@@DhikrDose putting opinion, and calling yourself a MUJTAHID is same thing?

@bentennyson3824

Ай бұрын

What is mujtahid?

@noneofyourbusiness-hg7mk

Ай бұрын

When on earth did he say that? May Allah deal with you severely for lying against a fellow Muslim

This "debate" showed that a compromised, compassionate version of Islam is more contradictory than secularism.

Waste of 116 minutes who watched the full debate. Brother Daniel explained more Islamic side in 20 minutes than Yasir qadhi in full debate.

YQ followers always make excuses for him, just so that they can continue to follow "Islam light" a.k.a secularism. The problem is just like Brother Daniel said, YQ slithers around in his speech so that he seems like a sunni Muslim and a secular at the same time. Akyol has just nothing to do with Islam, I don't know who that guy is or if he is Muslim. A lot of their points are just "we shouldn't do this" 1 hour in I haven't heard one "Allah said" or "our Prophet said" from these guys. We know that YQ is american first. thats why he says "we invaded..." his inferiority complex for being brown is just pathetic

@samy7013

2 ай бұрын

You nailed it, 100%. PS: Mustafa Akyol is a self-avowed Sunnah Denier, which actually makes him an apostate.

Please continue these works, much needed and appreciated

Khilafah is the way forward that will bring about real scholarship.

@juxtapositionMS

2 ай бұрын

is khilafah fard?

@geniunerf4868

2 ай бұрын

​@@juxtapositionMS Is it not obvious enough in the current state of the ummah?

@juxtapositionMS

2 ай бұрын

@@geniunerf4868 tell me how or why?

@geniunerf4868

2 ай бұрын

​@@juxtapositionMS No, I won't. Is it fard to establish secular democracy?

@themuslimminds

2 ай бұрын

@juxtapositionMS Yes, one of the highest forms of Fard. All the classical scholars agreed on it. Ruling by anything other than what Allah has revealed is prohibited by Allah.

It’s very sad and terrifying that we have people like these so called Scholars liberalising the religion of Islam when God is the one who legislated the religion.

@Therebelliousprince001

2 ай бұрын

It's one of the reasons why we are so weak...

Yasir Qadi being spinless the entire "debate" is just so typical at this point. I am surprised he still has any Muslims who are subscribed to him and take him seriously.

That first question is asking, "Should Muslims live their lives by man's made Laws or live their lives by ALLAH laws ?"

@zaheerpatel2449

Ай бұрын

I mean it's pretty straight forward right? So many words they use to duck and dive Surah Al Ahzab

Daniel your a beast Mashallah may Allah protect you and preserve you

IF you didnt tell me this was a debate, I would have thought that this was 2 people who are friends disagreeing on 20% of what they are discussing.

Great show brother Daniel mashallah. It’s important to expose those who reinterpret the deen and want to reform it before this evil is spread more

yasir has lost the plot

@abyrahman6610

2 ай бұрын

He never had it lol

@miso9788

2 ай бұрын

He's figuring it out

@Therebelliousprince001

2 ай бұрын

​@abyrahman6610 He did. He was amazing when he was living in saudi. Unfortunately he deviated when he came to America

@homtanks7259

2 ай бұрын

Sad but true

@Juan-tb2ww

2 ай бұрын

He is extremely dishonest. A little weasel.

How could this be called a debate though ?! .. both Qadi and Mustafa were complementing each other on almost every thing .. dishonest title which goes perfectly with the dishonest nature of both participants.

The verse that comes to my mind Whenever Qadhi speaks about change.. When it is said to them, “Do not spread disorder on the earth”, they say, “We are but reformers.”

@sesamezuzu

2 ай бұрын

Subhanallah

I’ve just diagnosed Yasir Qazi. He is infected with colonial inferiority complex that can be found in some south Asians…

@miso9788

2 ай бұрын

Brown sahib

@fark69

2 ай бұрын

I don't really think this is true, tbh. Ayakol is more in line with what you're saying. I think he sees that the US government views the idea that Islam is one law which is superior to secular laws and should be implemented worldwide to benefit people at the expense of the current rulers as a huge threat and he doesn't want the gov't to go harder on Muslims so he portrays this double mask version of Islam. But I'm just guessing

@homtanks7259

2 ай бұрын

Sad but true

@yim8116

2 ай бұрын

Ghora complex.

Why did Quraysh become extremely violent against prophet Muhammad pbuh and the Muslims? It had nothing to do with the 5 prayers, or fasting, or zakat. They didnt even care if someone believed in one God or even the idols. The prophet pbuh believed in one God, before revelation came to him. He used to go to mount Hira and worship Allah before he got revelation, and yet Quraysh loved him and had no problem with him doing any of that. When did they start having a problem with the prophet pbuh? It was after Allah revealed, "You, wrapped in your clothes. Arise and WARN ALL". (Al Muddathir 1-2). Quraysh was afraid that this message would bring on social, economic, and political change. A change that is not welcome if you were already at the top. They wanted to keep the status quo. Islam has to do with EVERY aspect of your life, and that includes politics. Like Quraysh, the secular world dont actually care if you pray 5 times or even 50 times a day in your home. But they are afraid of the change that Islam brings to everyone's life. They are afraid of it mainly because it goes against their desires.

@user-ul8rq2zq9x

2 ай бұрын

They don't care if Islam goes against their desires, they care when Islam doesn't allow a minority to take advantages of the majority, filling their pockets and impoverishing the masses.

@mah5298

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ul8rq2zq9x I agree. When I used the word "desire", I did also mean greed since it is also a desire.

@marcusj9947

2 ай бұрын

who gave Muhammad the right to dictate to the Qureish on their land?

@mah5298

2 ай бұрын

@@marcusj9947 God.

@marcusj9947

2 ай бұрын

@@mah5298 So can the hindus kick Muslims out of their land if their God says so?

Love this content brother, may Allah reward you and put barakah in your content

The most alarming aspect in this debate is that you can't tell who is the Islamic theologian and who isn't because both essentially sound the same due to their liberal frame of thinking. 🤦‍♂️ Historic levels of incompetence from a "Islamic theologian". Aykol is a known liberal so he spoke as expected but YQ was BEYOND TERRIBLE.

I'm really loving this new show, very informative and much needed discussions.

This was excellent! I have learned a lot of you. may Allah reward you and keep you in the straight path brother Daniel.

الحمد لله على نعمة الاسلام

it was very difficult to differentiate between YQ and kaafir Aykol. was like to liberals debate if we should have soft liberalism or hard liberalism

Daniel is doing a great job!!! These secularized people would easily deceive ordinary muslims through their apparent eloquence!

@Rabb865

2 ай бұрын

⁠@@posintabook597 Take your meds man 😂

Since Islam get detached from state we felt in this ditch where we are here

4:24 it’s literally at a center for “abrahamic heritage” this has a certain country’s fingerprints all over it

@Therebelliousprince001

2 ай бұрын

💯

How I was not aware of the new episode No notifications no nothing

Notice, when YQ addressing muslims he talks from Qur’an, Sunnah, passionate islamic speeches, but as soon as he is on secular platforms, he goes along with them.

@ryojs4286

2 ай бұрын

Thats a method of the sunnah somewhat Talk using their language

@mdfahd24

2 ай бұрын

​@@ryojs4286Bruh WHAT💀

I've never listened to Yasir qadi before .Whenever I come across his videos I would skip him. He talks differently to most Islamic scholars. He doesn't make sense

@ibnFarook

2 ай бұрын

Then my brother trust me you are missing a lot. Despite Daniel's personal opinion of Sheikh Yasir Qadhi he is indeed a legit scholar with vast knowledge of Islam. Go listen to the long lectures of his and compare his opinions with classical scholars of the past and you would find that his views are rooted from them. Daniel, I don't doubt his intentions but I do doubt his level of in-depth knowledge.

@fark69

2 ай бұрын

I do think Qadhi is wrong about this topic, but many of his series and speeches, especially when they deal with history, are well researched and worth watching. He may not be right about everything, but he does have some good scholarship also

Yasir Qadi made me feel that we are inferior when Allah actully told us that we are the sopperior in the Quran!

00:19 Debate between Yasir Qadhi and Mustafa Akyol 03:02 Government and religion relationship in Islam 07:08 Yasir Qadhi uses vague responses to appeal to liberal values 09:03 Debate highlights differing perspectives on religion and politics 12:50 Debate on the separation of religion and government 14:47 Debate on the separation of government and religion 18:21 Advocating for religious freedom and universal values 20:10 Discussion on the impact of European ideas on Turkey's legal system 23:43 Imposed morality through coercion leads to hypocrisy and resentment 25:28 Balancing freedom and morality in different cultures 29:03 Critique of Western liberalism's imposition and legacy of dominance 30:58 Respecting local autonomy and organic change 34:45 Liberalism's view of religious freedom is not applied in reality 36:22 Yasir Qadhi debunks the claim of contesting religious freedom 39:52 Muslims should not assume all religions are correct. 41:45 Restriction of false religions and practices in Sharia 45:05 The importance of religious freedom and respecting individual choices. 46:47 Discussion on the impact of Western media on Muslim communities 49:51 Yasir Qadhi opposes endorsing the law of blasphemy in Islamic societies. 51:28 Local Pakistanis should decide how to address blasphemy laws. 54:43 Respect and abide by the law of the land, with room for criticism and change. 56:24 Freedom to worship and personal life should not harm others, an Islamic and Universal Freedom. 59:51 A problematization of the assumption that freedom and democracy are good for all 1:01:24 Discussing complexities of freedom and democracy 1:04:46 Debate on religious freedom and coercion 1:06:47 Debate on freedom in Muslim societies 1:10:21 Discussion on societal norms and decency levels 1:11:59 Women's freedom leading to nudity in public 1:15:14 Application of Sharia in a nation state is not about copying every law verbatim. 1:17:04 Yasir Qadhi's position on the nation state and Sharia limitations. 1:20:36 Islam does not impose requirements on people. 1:22:24 Debate on ethical and moral issues 1:26:04 Criticism of Yasir Qadhi's responses on sensitive religious topics 1:28:02 Religion's role in shaping natural values 1:31:05 Debating the necessity and feasibility of a caliphate in a secular society 1:33:02 Advocating for a modern nation state absorbing Islamic values 1:36:40 Debate on Islamic nation establishment 1:38:25 Discussion on the concept of caliphate in Islam 1:41:49 Bible's preservation questioned, Quran's clarity highlighted 1:43:31 Exploring a new version of a caliphate 1:46:48 Government's role in making sins legal or illegal 1:48:40 Discussion on the balance between personal piety and public order regarding alcohol consumption. 1:51:50 Yasir Qadhi discusses approach to alcohol ban 1:53:51 Calling out prominent figures for inexcusable mistakes 1:57:31 Alcohol consumption in Turkish society and societal tensions around religious practices 1:59:14 Social enforcement of Islamic values in traditional societies 2:02:56 Both cautious about coercive theological state, differing on level of religious values in politics 2:04:43 Debate on enforcing Quran laws and punishment 2:08:45 Encouraging Islamic morality in governance 2:10:30 Debate limitations on liberal ISM and Islamic law enforcement 2:14:17 Islam advocates for certain freedoms, not absolute freedom 2:16:15 Debate on religious freedom and its impact on society 2:20:23 Yasir Qadhi discusses feminism

@happinesstolerant

2 ай бұрын

JeezakAllah khairan akhi.

The algorithms is not promoting the content. Pls like and share as always to increase coverage.

It amazes me that any Muslim would take Yasir Qadhi seriously after what he has shown us. May Allah SWT continue to expose the deformers and hypocrites amongst us and may Allah SWT bless you for the work that you do, ameen!

@efdawahfan

2 ай бұрын

there are many secular muslims in the world...compasionate imams etc all to please the western lifestyle and getting accepted by them....seriously no honor nothing...just simple sellouts.

@Therebelliousprince001

2 ай бұрын

Ameen

Great show, watching from North Carolina, United States keep up the dawah for the ummah.

Daniel's voice acting is seriously underrated

Can't believe this .. this is embarrassing, thanks for your great work and for opening my eyes and the ummah.. jazakhallah khairan brother

What a great video, Jazakallah kheyr brother, this is my third comment because you're taking me through different stages of enjoyment and 'izzah of deen. Mashallah tabarakallah for your work and may Allah bless you and your family akh

Yasir Qadhi is people pleaser, changes the fatwas according to his desire... May Allah swt give us true guidance and allow us to follow each every sunnah of our beloved Prohpet muhammad (saw)

In the entirety of the interview Yadir Qadhi mentioned quotes. Theological quotes = a lot Bible verses = 1 Declaration of Independence = 1 Quran’s verses = 0 Muhammed saws hadith = 0 Islamic scholars quotes = 0

May Allah guide us to the right path

39:57 " why because they are wrong" this made me laugh so much . I really enjoy the Haqiqat show , thank you brother, I'm learning a Lot from you

Qadhi sounds like a BLM activist - beyond a joke

Well done brother Daniel..May Allah guide them ameen

Looks like YQ paid some SA bots to call him a "great scalla" in the comments. Disgraceful

You know for a fact that after the so called “Debate” they both hugged it out and were happy about the good and “conductive” Debate they had 😊

As soon as I started listening to the interview I turned it off right away when I heard Yasir Qadi talking about there is no law that fits every part of the world. He is clearly wrong. We have that law and that is Allah’s law

Don't forget to like the video 🇵🇸❤️

I dunno why your clips are shadow banned

I really love these series of yours jazakallah khairan brother

Great show jazak allah khair, commenting to help out

I really love this format. I think I speak for all of us, when I say that we needed this type of content.

Yasir Qadhi is not a philosopher and really his understanding of Islamic Law is suspect.

@R.F.92

Ай бұрын

It's pure heresy.

Throughout this discussion/debate, YQ kept moving left then right then drinking water then checking his laptop, making himself look EXTREMELY BUSY while spewing utter BS. 🙂

@homtanks7259

2 ай бұрын

I thought is he on Coke

Just now getting the notification for the video thanks for all the work you do for the ummah brother Daniel !!

I love this long-form analysis best and miss them sometimes. Keep going!

Excellent breakdown. Thank you

Jazak Allah kheir brother Daniel for exposing these cowards they shoyld male dua to Allah subhana for courage with imman yakkin specialy for a scholar may Allah subhana guide us all ameen ya rahima rabbi Allah.

Daniel, please also discuss it in light of the RAND report

@tahaoz2122

2 ай бұрын

Which RAND report? Can you tell?

I just reached 1:02:11 and had to pause to make this comment: He says the US attacking Al-Qaeda (by invading Afghanistan) is "debatable" whether it was right or wrong. If we want to look at it from Purely international law then it's not debatable at all. If a country experiences a terrorist attack, they cannot simply start bombing another country to get ahold of the suspected terrorist. They will have to provide sufficient evidence. The US refused an investigation into 9/11. They simply told us what happened. They refused to provide any evidence to Afghanistan that a group is responsible for the attack. This guy is a Turkish. He should know that in 2016 there was a coup attempt by Gulen, a terrorist organization. Their leader was residing in the US. If the US was a weak country would it be " debatable" for turkey to invade it ?

@TommyGok

2 ай бұрын

My dear brother, why are you surprised by the g*nocidal undertones of liberals? Turkey was founded off a g*nocide, I am a Türk. We were betrayed by our 'elites' who were secularists, ironically Mustafa Kemal WAS NOT democratically elected.

Makes me cringe to here reformists speak

I love you Daniel for the sake of Allah (Swt). MaShaAllah! Jazaka’Allahu Ahsanal Jaza! You are a gift for Muslim ummah specially for western… Keep up the great work!

I can't watch this, I am embarrassed for this guy Yasir, is he even considering himself a muslim? Which side is he on? American side?

I freaking LOVE ❤️ your commentary. It’s sooooo wholesome and doesn’t miss little things others constantly miss

That doesn't make any sense, shouldnt YQ be debating a non reformist traditional MUSLIM......oh wait I get it, they're debating what rout a reformist should take

Yasir "Mr. My personal ijtihaad" Qadhi tries to play all sides. When he speaks, it actually reminds me of a verse I read in the New Testament before my conversion to Islam. It's a quote by Paul, the true founder of Christianity, where he says " I have become all things to all men". Before any Yasir Q. fanboys get into a hissy, I am not making takfir of him, I'm just commenting on the similarity of the mindset between the two. YQ flip flops way too much to be trusted. If I'm not mistaken, I believe years ago he was more inclined towards the pseudo-salafi/wahhaabi cult, which wouldn't be surprising, in that many who originally have those leanings, often eventually go to the other extreme.

2:11:33 there was no public demand for Islam when the Prophet peace be upon him started preaching nor when Essa, nor Nooh nor Lut nor Hud, nor Salah , nor Ibrahim alahim-es-salam started preaching. So we know with whom Akyol would have stood in those times.

No one can mimic modern women beetter than our brother Daniel period 😂

@faryalbutt1463

2 ай бұрын

Haha yes and I loved it when he did mimicry

From DAY 1 I had doubts about Yasir Q. now he is fully exposed

I didnt even see the notification

If he claims that the Quraa'n is not preserved he is then a disbeliever. If he believes that Islams ,values, laws or way which Allah has revealed is equal to anything else or there is a better value law etc., he is then a disbeliever.

According to Mustafa Akyol: Imposing religious rules = bad Imposing secular laws = good Yasir Qadhi barely made a dent in this "debate" - it was practically 2 people agreeing with eachother 95% of the time, with their framework being more or less the same. May Allah guide them and us. Jazak'Allah khair for your work. I enjoyed this episode. Love your humor.

MAKE MORE OF THERE I REALLY LEARNED ALOT FROM THIS VIDEO

Surah Al-Imran 3:102 يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ٱتَّقُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ حَقَّ تُقَاتِهِۦ وَلَا تَمُوتُنَّ إِلَّا وَأَنتُم مُّسْلِمُونَ ١٠٢ O believers! Be mindful of Allah in the way He deserves, and do not die except in ˹a state of full˺ submission ˹to Him˺. اے ایمان لانے والو ! اللہ سے ڈرو جیسا کہ اس سے ڈرنے کا حق ہے ۔ تم کو موت نہ آئے مگر اس حال میں کہ تم مسلم ہو۔ Ey, iymon keltirganlar! Allohga haqiqiy taqvo ila taqvo qiling. Va faqat musulmon holingizdagina bu dunyodan o`ting. Wahai orang-orang yang beriman! Bertakwalah kepada Allah sebenar-benar takwa kepada-Nya dan janganlah kamu mati kecuali dalam keadaan Muslim. হে মু’মিনগণ! আল্লাহকে ভয় কর যেমনভাবে তাঁকে ভয় করা উচিত। তোমরা মুসলিম না হয়ে কক্ষনো মরো না। О те, которые уверовали! Бойтесь Аллаха должным образом и умирайте не иначе, как будучи мусульманами! ای کسانی‌که ایمان آورده‌اید! از الله؛ آن گونه که شایسته ترسیدن از او است؛ بترسید، و نمیرید مگر اینکه مسلمان باشید. Ey iman edenler! Allah'tan, O'na yaraşır şekilde korkun ve ancak müslümanlar olarak can verin. ऐ ईमान वालो! अल्लाह से डरो, जैसा कि उससे डरना चाहिए तथा तुम्हारी मृत्यु न आए परंतु इस स्थिति में कि तुम मुसलमान हो।

Thank you daniel. In the future, can you take viewer calls?

The laws against blasphemy aren't the problem, but maybe the implementation of the Pakistani state is. You can't just accuse someone of blasphemy, without any proof and witnesses in shari'a law. If Pakistan does so, it's wrong. Does that mean, that the whole law itself is wrong? It's God's law!

@Obit0bi

2 ай бұрын

You cant take pakisthan ,it doesnt have shariah law atleast a bit

Thanks for the "laugh out loud" moments. 😂 Excellent video. Jazak Allahu khayran Barakallahu feekum Alhamdulillahi rabbi al'alameen

A shame that this is supposed to be "representative" of Islam... May Allah Give us the love of his deen. Aameen...

No Islamic source was harmed in the making of that interview.

First time came across your channel. The tone of the commentary seems very sensational. It would be nice to keep a neutral, respectful tone so that more consideration can be given to the points on their own merit rather than the person speaking.

JAK Daniel for doing this. It is important to shed light on these custom made self-claiming scholars.