RADICAL FEMINISM DESTROYED. CLASSICAL FEMINISM is the answer.

Ғылым және технология

RADICAL Feminism OWNED. CLASSICAL Feminism is the answer.
An excerpt from the Pangburn Podcast with Travis Pangburn.
Video created by Pangburn Promoter, Harsha Gullapalli.
#radicalfeminism #classicalfeminism #pangburnpodcast

Пікірлер: 135

  • @Pangburn
    @Pangburn4 жыл бұрын

    Remember to subscribe!

  • @10aDowningStreet

    @10aDowningStreet

    4 жыл бұрын

    Free cookies to all subscribers!

  • @charliebrownau

    @charliebrownau

    4 жыл бұрын

    Feminism was created by the Global Zionist LEFT to aid in Agenda 21 2020-2030 , create a new taxable group , while brainwashing women to turn against * Western Males * Right Wing * Freedom over to Left wing socialism and Communism Welfare state to replace Marriage Equal Opportunity + Merit + hard work replaced with Equal Outcome + Leg over Make women dependent on the state for Money, resources and protection , instead of Males By their own words and actions from the 70s to now the truth has been exposed for Multi culturalism Diversity Feminism "equality" LGBT Open Borders Radical just means AUTHORIANISM Overthrow

  • @Pangburn

    @Pangburn

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@10aDowningStreet and butt pics....

  • @charliebrownau

    @charliebrownau

    4 жыл бұрын

    Feminism (Socialism/Marxism/Commies/Zionism) since 50s:- * Replace Democracy with Socialism * women dependent on state for resources * Women HATE MEN+Democracy/west * Spread Misinformation + change words * Replace Equal Opportunity+Merit with equal outcome * Ability to play the victim * Remove individual accountability & Responsibility for women via - abortion (MURDER) - No fault divorce - Duluth model - pussy pass in courts - Metoo * Anti White * Anti White Western Males * Anti Merit+Reward+Discipline * Anti Western Society * Anti Western Structure/laws * Anti Individual * Anti Capitalism

  • @charliebrownau

    @charliebrownau

    4 жыл бұрын

    LEFT WING = Socialism/Commie/Judaism/Marxism (AUTHORITARIANISM) = Equal Outcome + "Diversity" + Censorship + Open Borders (Globalism) + Victimhood/Group blame + Remove Due Process & Evidence + Big gov spending + Big Gov + Global "free" trade + Mult culturalism + Collectivism + Group "think" VS RIGHT WING = Democracy / FREEDOM = Free Speech + Freedom of Expression + Freedom of region Freedom to bear arms + Freedom to defend yourself with arms+ Equal Opportunity + Merit + Reward +Proper border control (Nationalist)+ Individual accountability + Due Process & Evidence + Smaller Gov + small gov spending + little to no overseas aid + National production/farming/manufacturing + Fair Trade + National free market

  • @sarahb441
    @sarahb4412 жыл бұрын

    I hope no one is offended by this, it is my opinion, I do know many others share this opinion and some are too afraid to say anything due to social oppression, however, as a Woman, firstly I'd like to thank all the Men out there, I would never want to be a man, I feel it would be terribly daunting so I am one of many who appreciate all you do, the responsibilities and pressure you undertake everyday just for being born a Man. Second, I am very proud to be a woman, I feel morally obligated to inform all out there that we don't all think as Feminists do, and can appreciate the differences between men and women, it is a beautiful, also a natural engineering of a sort, we complement one another. Women cannot do all the things that men can do, but that is ok, it does not make men or women lesser than the other because there are things that we are designed for and should embrace that, most definitely not fight it, it goes against our nature. Whether you are a man or a woman, you can do great thing with your life, it is up to you, just please try to make them positive things, start by making someone else's life a little better for a start, or better yet, start with yourself, do something to make YOU happy.

  • @elicielcajigas1977

    @elicielcajigas1977

    Жыл бұрын

    Well I'm glad to hear that not all women think like a self centered, self absorbed, self righteous, self opinionated Narcissist. Which tells me that there are some decent women out there willing to co-exist and work alongside with men instead of making life about competition between men and women. That type of mentality from women is highly admired and appreciated.

  • @sarahb441

    @sarahb441

    Жыл бұрын

    @@elicielcajigas1977 Absolutely we're not all that bad :) I have had may debates with women of all kinds who feel self righteous, some people need to see life for what it is and not what they imagine it to be. Men and Women are meant to coexist in harmony. Human beings are naturally competitive, but If there is competition involved it should be man against man and woman against woman, not between the genders.

  • @elicielcajigas1977

    @elicielcajigas1977

    Жыл бұрын

    @@sarahb441 That's why I keep telling people that these radical feminist women are trying to create a perfect world that we know can never be and in my opinion they should stop the foolishness in trying to make everyone look the same because that will never happen. Also these women want to make life about competition between men and women. For what reason? I will never get. In my opinion, being a competitive person brings out the dark, ugly, aggressive, rotten, sadistic and evil side of people. That's why I don't believe in being competitive with anyone. In reality, the only person that people should be competitive with is themselves. They should be able to only test themselves to see how good, gifted and talented they really are and push themselves to be the very best that they can be. Competing against someone only brings trouble and makes that person resent you as a person for you wanting to compete against them. That means that you want to make an adversary, rival, nemesis, and enemy out of the person you're competing with. Which is exactly what radical feminist women want when it comes to men. That I have never wanted to have with women. I wanted to be friendly and social with women. I wanted to get along with women even though I am different from the normal. I'll be the first to admit that I'm not a special person, I'm not a great looking person, I'm not that much of a handsome man and I'm proud of that. I love being an imperfect man and ordinary. All I do is just live my life in an ordinary way and I am proud of it. I don't have a muscular physique and I am proud of that. But with these radical feminist women, they think all men have to look like male supermodels/bodybuilders for women to acknowledge and accept them as human beings. Any sign of imperfection and they won't pay any attention to them. I mean, it's pathetic that radical feminist women feel like that's what men have to do to get women to acknowledge and accept them for who and what they are. That's why they don't like average unattractive men and why they have the hate and contempt for average unattractive men. In my opinion, that's a stupid reason for them to not acknowledge and accept men that are different from the normal. Don't you sometimes wish that men of all different sizes and shapes can be acknowledged and accepted by women? What's with the obsession with wanting to live a so called "perfect life" we know can never be? I'll never understand that.

  • @cathylegg530

    @cathylegg530

    11 ай бұрын

    Hope you get picked, honey

  • @Foolsjoker

    @Foolsjoker

    7 ай бұрын

    Just posting here to remind us all that words of kindness and honesty can hold a meaning for years, while most of the modern toxicity can and will be forgotten by most of us. Remember, even if you make a small difference, you are making....a difference.

  • @palpha0181
    @palpha01813 жыл бұрын

    The good old days when women love men in action and rest together

  • @elicielcajigas1977

    @elicielcajigas1977

    Жыл бұрын

    A pity those days are gone all because women want to be the new "men(dominant gender)" of our society world. Why else would they quit being feminine and see themselves as more masculine?

  • @carpenoctem775
    @carpenoctem7752 жыл бұрын

    Feminism isn’t about gender equality. It’s about misandry. Reverse sexism is still sexism.

  • @cathylegg530
    @cathylegg53011 ай бұрын

    Which radical feminists do you have in mind? I ask because equality of outcome sounds closer to liberal than radical feminism to me. So I'd appreciate a citation. Who did you read before making these assertions?

  • @ericgentzke4635
    @ericgentzke46352 жыл бұрын

    This just popped into my head but I think the reason why we all get paid less than our parents did is because back then you had better pay somebody well if you want a piece of their time, but when women joined the workforce for the reason of wanting to be something in the world and wanting to work the employees hevr discoceeed that somebody with passion and who wants to have a career will work on far less money without finding something else.

  • @denebh733
    @denebh7332 жыл бұрын

    Equal opportunity is the ultimate equality. Equality of outcome simply discourages hard work, because then why would you ever work hard? The original feminism was all about equality of opportunity. There are sadly still many many countries that have women as second class citizens, and this is where feminism is needed most. As a humanist, I stand for equal rights and equal opportunity, which is why we now need to focus on stepping up the global baseline of living conditions and rights for women, not just trying to accuse every man who sits with his legs apart of being sexist.

  • @elicielcajigas1977

    @elicielcajigas1977

    Жыл бұрын

    So why isn't feminism being practiced in 3rd world countries where women are treated like less than human beings? Where they're executed for meaningless bullshit? Where they're defiled, degraded, and violated in ways that would make an ordinary woman want to put a gun in her mouth and pull the trigger? In the United States of America and in nations like Canada and in Europe, women have never had freedom so good. It's just that they want as much or more human rights than men because they want to replace men as the benefactors and world leaders. They don't want to be equal to men or they wouldn't be running around telling everyone how it's men that are oppressing and suppressing women denying them of any human rights. So you know the concept of these women creating a so called "equality advocating" feminist movement is bullshit. They only want "equality" as long as it's they that get to be in charge of society.

  • @nathanpetrich7309

    @nathanpetrich7309

    Жыл бұрын

    If your goal is hard work, the best way is to threaten people's lives. If your goal is happy, healthy people, you may have different priorities. Equal Opportunity is a dog whistle. Even if you don't believe we have equal opportunity today, which it seems you don't, just believing it is possible means you can concieve of a world where an entire race of people underperforms as some function of their race, by nature, and is ultimately punished for it despite having no power to change their situation. Specifically saying you don't want equality of outcome further implies that even if these groups did get equal opportunity, the outcome would still be unequal for these groups. Also, the "culture of dependency" argument is really garbage. Don't let anyone convince you that helping people magically hurts them instead. That aint Jesus.

  • @elicielcajigas1977

    @elicielcajigas1977

    Жыл бұрын

    @@nathanpetrich7309 Why should the lives of people be threatened? What does threatening the lives of people solve? Nothing, my friend. If people work hard, they should do it for themselves, not to threaten people's lives. That's the problem with people, everybody is so quick to be competitive with one another. Don't you know that brings out the worst in people. You gotta do for self, you know. You gotta compete with yourself only to see how great you can be and how determined you are to be better than your original self. Never worry about others. If others are making a great life for themselves and you know about it, just let them do them and just worry about trying to ascend yourself and your life to great pastures. When you worry about how others are doing, you lose focus and that's how you start to grow jealousy and envy for the person who is living a much greater life than you and you worry about not achieving the same success they've achieved. Nobody needs to threaten anyone, just go for the gusto and only focus on yo life!

  • @elicielcajigas1977

    @elicielcajigas1977

    Жыл бұрын

    @@nathanpetrich7309 And you're right about the culture of dependency. People think that helping out others is a sign of weakness and that it's just people going soft. Their problem is that if they help out the weak, less unfortunate, etc., they'll be ridiculed and persecuted for showing kindness and them having a great heart for people. Which is why we live in such a rotten society where being kind to people is such a bad thing. I mean, so much damn anger and hate in this world in people. Hate and having contempt for people after a while gets so boring and tiring that it leads to sadness and misery after a while. And who'd want to live a life like that being angry, pissed off at the world? I mean our world isn't perfect, so suit it. People should just acknowledge reality and try to make the best out of their lives as much as they can is how I see it and how people in general should see it. Having hate and contempt for one another solves nothing and it won't bring happiness.

  • @nathanpetrich7309

    @nathanpetrich7309

    Жыл бұрын

    @@elicielcajigas1977 Slavery built the world we live in today. It's unpleasant, but it is a fact. Acknowledging this is not going to bring out the worst in people, it will force them to realize that our culture of hard work is self destructive and cruel. As much as Malthusian Conservatives would like to believe that our global resources are stretched thin already and we all have to work super hard to survive, more educated people know that it is a matter of organization that causes scarcity today. We should be transitioning into a post-scarcity economy so we can party every night, but the wealthy and powerful among us have every incentive to resist it, to keep the workers enslaved, peoples divided, toiling hard every day to keep a greedy machine grinding forward and ripping up the planet. Anyone with half a brain knows it's better to work smarter, not harder, and those who study brains have learned that creative problem solving is very difficult when we are afraid for our lives-but our capacity for hard work improves remarkably. When I say the best way to make people work hard is to threaten their lives, I may turn out to be factually wrong depending on the specific type of work, but my deeper implication is that our culture of hard work isn't generally alligned with our own wellness.

  • @moriahgamesdev
    @moriahgamesdev4 жыл бұрын

    I would have gone with DESTROYED!!! for max clickbait.

  • @Pangburn

    @Pangburn

    4 жыл бұрын

    We switched it just for you lol

  • @basiouny96

    @basiouny96

    2 жыл бұрын

    This is actually what i searched for!

  • @syedabrar3477
    @syedabrar34772 жыл бұрын

    Excellent job

  • @fraustedwhite
    @fraustedwhite3 жыл бұрын

    I think anyone should be able to try to apply themselves at anything. I have no problem with a dude that is a doula. I have personally worked in construction and did very well. If you can't make shit happen, you'll fall by the wayside. Especially if you live in an at-will employment state.

  • @elicielcajigas1977

    @elicielcajigas1977

    Жыл бұрын

    Can't argue with that statement. But you should also know that there are many young, determined, and able capable people that are willing to prove themselves to be a productive member of society. If one doesn't want to have the heart to take on young and eager people who are just dying to prove themselves to be the next wave of being leaders of tomorrow, that's just them missing out on an opportunity to have young, fresh and strong, healthy and hungry people on their team. And those hungry people are average unattractive people that want to get a piece of the successful pie they advertise.

  • @AGNOSTIC_incomprehensibleXIV
    @AGNOSTIC_incomprehensibleXIV Жыл бұрын

    I think it would have done @Thunderf00t a good service if back in the day he specified the type of feminism he was criticizing more often ('radical feminism', 'sex-negative feminism' etc. ) instead of so commonly just saying 'feminism' because he's CLEARLY not in opposition to women's rights (as far as I know).

  • @brightbeyonddarkness
    @brightbeyonddarkness4 жыл бұрын

    You guys are awesome.

  • @blues2oo
    @blues2oo4 жыл бұрын

    Do we still use the term OWNED as a clickbait? Apparently we do.

  • @Pangburn

    @Pangburn

    4 жыл бұрын

    We are running a test with the clickbait title.

  • @Mark73

    @Mark73

    7 ай бұрын

    ​@@PangburnPlease consider the test failed. Don't do that shit. If you want to be an intellectual channel then act like it.

  • @sergegaash
    @sergegaash4 жыл бұрын

    It’s so sad, I’m speechless and got headache in 2 minutes.

  • @secrets.295
    @secrets.2952 жыл бұрын

    No feminist get destroyed in this video. Click bait, time is money

  • @snackentity5709
    @snackentity57094 жыл бұрын

    god damnit pangburn.. i wasn't serious about the clickbait titles lol

  • @Pangburn
    @Pangburn4 жыл бұрын

    We are running a test with the clickbait title.

  • @daha3074
    @daha30742 жыл бұрын

    What is modern feminism trying to achieve?

  • @elicielcajigas1977

    @elicielcajigas1977

    Жыл бұрын

    The only thing I can think of is more separation, more dividing, more gender animosity and resentment, more unwarranted hatred and contempt between the genders, and more of the same bullshit fighting and warring against one another for gender supremacy. If this is the meaning of life, then I want nothing to do with it. I wasn't born 45 fucking years ago just to be in the middle of a nonsensical "power struggle" between men and women.

  • @aggressiveagitatedgif806
    @aggressiveagitatedgif8062 жыл бұрын

    My legs are not gay

  • @jdcroix6067
    @jdcroix60673 жыл бұрын

    Put them in constructions, high rise buildings, lets see.

  • @taty9872
    @taty98722 жыл бұрын

    This is not radical feminism

  • @alvarado_wav
    @alvarado_wav Жыл бұрын

    Wow, I really thought this was satire. Whoops.

  • @alsalcal
    @alsalcal3 жыл бұрын

    How do these findings in the first 10 seconds of your video show evidence of nature as opposed to nurture? That is, how do we know women scoring higher in "agreeableness" is due to genetics and not socialization?

  • @_shadownotes_

    @_shadownotes_

    2 жыл бұрын

    Estrogen

  • @totti1st

    @totti1st

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@_shadownotes_ wasn't it called oestrogen or that's another thing?

  • @_shadownotes_

    @_shadownotes_

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@totti1st according to Google it can be spelled either way

  • @Mark73

    @Mark73

    7 ай бұрын

    ​@@_shadownotes_Saying one word doesn't prove anything. Can you cite any studies showing that estrogen is responsible for all of those differences and that socialization is responsible for none?

  • @_shadownotes_

    @_shadownotes_

    7 ай бұрын

    @@Mark73 National Institutes of Health - Aggression in Women: Behavior, Brain and Hormones - PMC Aggression is a complex behavior, and it would be neglectful to pretend it has a singular cause. But to ignore the effect that biological differences of hormones have would be idiotic.

  • @jenniek8391
    @jenniek8391 Жыл бұрын

    Why get angry at "radical" feminists? They are loud and can be annoying, but they're a tiny minority in the grand scheme of things. Both women and men are being killed and repressed on a daily basis - shouldn't we be focusing more on that? This type of simplistic video does the job of making people angry, but it doesn't actually help anyone.

  • @thomasslone1964
    @thomasslone19643 жыл бұрын

    I bet feminists really hate these videos because they can't interrupt you with a "highly intellectual" response anytime you udder two words

  • @namedropper126
    @namedropper126 Жыл бұрын

    Good mansplanation 😂

  • @linusliljequist
    @linusliljequist4 жыл бұрын

    Whilst i agree with almost all of this, there is just one thing that to me is still left unspoken. Generally i agree, equality of oppurtunity is what ought to be sought after and the outcome of it shall decide itself, as we're currently seeing. However, i believe it is very important to ask ourselves; Why aren't we achieveing equality of outcome? Part of it is today, atleast the best answer from scientific study, is biology. We're seeing that the countries who generally has more equality of oppurtunity has less equality of outcome. But how can we tell if the result of equal oppurtunity is affected by our culture/history/upbringing? And to which degree? As i said, i do not deny current science but i see a question that isn't being answered aswell.

  • @GreenPandaTV

    @GreenPandaTV

    4 жыл бұрын

    As if we should aim to achieve equality of outcome. We should let people be free to do what they want and feel they need to do feel happy. Don't you think that a better goal than just equality of outcome ? What is wrong about having roles ? Or even swapping the roles ? Nothing. If at the end people chose to do it and not some ideology that aim to achieve equality of outcome. Are you free from society if society tell you that your goal is to be like men and reach same paychecks ? Is it not that the result of manufactured culture (or new culture)/new ways of rising girls/new history ? See ? If you achieve equality of outcome, maybe women will be happy, maybe men will be happy. But still the means used are the same than those you are denouncing. We should talk about this things. But we should also stop imposing goals to others. You are free to ask your wife to achieve the same as you in life or she is not worth it. I will ask mine what would make her happy and work my ass off to make it happen. Neo-Feminism is retarded, factually.

  • @linusliljequist

    @linusliljequist

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@GreenPandaTV This is exactly my point aswell, we shouldn't AIM for equality of outcome. But we must, it is important, ask ourselves why there isn't an equality of outcome. As i've already adressed currently it seems to be biological factors, but we have actual way of knowing wether or not the way most societies are built up (Culture, History, etc...) are having an effect on the balance of outcome. What i am trying to say is; whilst we shouldn't aim for equality of outcome we shouldn't just dismiss it. How can we know that it is solely based upon biological factrs? Answer actually is that we cannot, we can make a strong case for it but there will still be no answer to the cultural/historical aspect to it. We shouldn't aim for equality of outcome, but it seems equally retarded that to completely dismiss it and outright not see if it is achievable. I'm not making an argument for radical feminism or neo-feminism, i'm trying to think logically. There is nothing that suggest equality of outcome is better or worse than current day, so why should we dismiss the idea? Perhaps time haven't passed long enough for cultural aspects develope? There's alot of questions like this that just shouldn't be left unanswered, it seems extremely weird to just put your anchor in one end and refuse to look at the other. I'm not saying we will ever achieve equality of outcome, but there is nothing that says it is a poor idea to try or to atleast invest in discovering what other parts of our culture/history/biology/psychology/gender might impact the outcome of equal oppurtunities.

  • @Just_logic

    @Just_logic

    3 жыл бұрын

    Why frame of this concept is about paycheck. Isn’t life inclusive of family. Almost everything is interconnected. Why is being a housewife downgraded? Is The frame work of man working and wife Raising the children so bad? Has the current western culture brought you good results? The so called women empowerment or independency? Initially women were brought into the workforce for politicians to be able to increase tax returns. What were the results? Were the divorce rate higher? In principal there are always two parts into any concept. 1) mechanism 2) results If you have bad results there is something wrong with the mechanism.

  • @klamklam88
    @klamklam882 жыл бұрын

    I believe in womens rights, but not feminism

  • @bevAmck

    @bevAmck

    Жыл бұрын

    This is an absurd statement which shows that your knowledge of feminism probably stopped after you googled it.

  • @rosieraven2617
    @rosieraven26173 жыл бұрын

    What jobs are you talking about?

  • @leoruda
    @leoruda Жыл бұрын

    And where does agreeableness come from? Is it not a personality trait? Where is the evidence personality is innate? This seems just a reproduction of one of Petersons arguments against feminism, as much as his coined phrase that people with leftist views of equality between men and women - which i'm sure he can lump together in some derogatory manner- , demand equality of outcome. These arguments gloss over culture determined behavior. Even male rats will became agreeable - even more than the female - in certain socially oriented experiments with groups of rats, and surprise there, this happens when they see that as a means of survival (OMG, what a surprise! lol). If a culture teaches you the "correct" way of being by, for example, teachers responding differently to expressions of anger and assertiveness in boys and girls in kindergarden - by punishing these behaviors in girls disproportionally to men, from whom it is in fact reinforced. There are several studies showing these cultural influences. What is advocated for is a change in cultural which does not continue to influence negatively the possibility of a woman to occupy these same spaces. This begins in early childhood and school. It happens undeniably. We won't see women who are more assertive if they are not allowed to learn to be assertive. Now.. if you don't want that to happen. Than i'd say your using the arguments you can for what you want. Who am I to judge? (Bonus time: did you know poor people are more agreeable than rich people? Wonder what effect that would have on women who depend financially on men.) (Bonus time 2: could the radical feminist be the least agreeable women? If so, its seems society is doing a great job of putting them back in there place by refusing and ridiculing there non-agreeableness)

  • @dpax2195
    @dpax21954 жыл бұрын

    Travis Pangburn is going the way of David Smalley. Keep trying to ride that anti-sjw bandwagon!

  • @Pangburn

    @Pangburn

    4 жыл бұрын

    hahahaha

  • @Pangburn

    @Pangburn

    4 жыл бұрын

    Travis says that social justice is evil. Just a perversion of justice.

  • @gustavowilliamson-perez4737

    @gustavowilliamson-perez4737

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Pangburn who is Travis

  • @twonumber22
    @twonumber224 жыл бұрын

    yikes

  • @arijeetkarmakar3778
    @arijeetkarmakar37783 жыл бұрын

    Good one Jordan Peterson!

  • @sohammukherjee3942
    @sohammukherjee39422 жыл бұрын

    See rallying for equal pay, opportunities and Gender Equality is understandable and frankly it's a very noble cause. I wholeheartedly support it. But the whole concept of man spreading makes no sense. It just doesn't.

  • @reap3rrl941

    @reap3rrl941

    2 жыл бұрын

    there is no pay gap

  • @elicielcajigas1977

    @elicielcajigas1977

    Жыл бұрын

    Yeah, if you're considering places in 3rd world communist nations where women are treated like less than human beings. But the United States of America and in nations like Canada and parts of Europe have never had life so good. And yet women in those nations have always felt that what they're paid is never good enough for them. Radical feminist women today are spoiled, entitled, unappreciative, ungrateful, greedy, self centered, self absorbed and egotistical Narcissist ingrates that want to have the entire piece of the pie for doing little to no work or they want to take as much as they want and to leave men with little to nothing. Because in their minds, they feel men have so much and can get everything that they want without begging on their knees. Says who? Men that served in the military can't always get what they want. When they get back home from serving their country, the system treats them worse than ordinary average Americans. Military servicemen are either homeless or treated like dogs/animals. So Idk where these women get the idea that they're the people that suffer the misery of being overlooked, under appreciated, overworked, underpaid, being looked upon as less than human beings. There are people in this world that have suffer just as much barbaric forms of abuse and persecution as women. And these radical feminist women are running around saying that men don't know what it's like to be looked down upon, discriminated on, shitted on by the system, being oppressed and persecuted by the system. OH REALLY? WE DON'T? I don't see many men throwing a fucking block party celebrating on a daily basis and enjoy clubbing except the 1% wealthy elites and socialites that don't give a shit about the rest of us and by that, I mean both men and women. Us average, ordinary Americans mainly hate our lives and live our lives being angry at the world and taking our hate out on people that don't deserve to be scapegoats to why we're angry at the system so much.

  • @TheToledoTrumpton
    @TheToledoTrumpton4 жыл бұрын

    Classical Feminism is not the answer either. We don't need an advocacy for any one identity group, or any discriminatory laws, which are defined by race, gender or religion. We need people advocating for poor people, abused people, or homeless people, for example. We don't need any group that focuses on only one kind of people.

  • @canbest7668
    @canbest7668 Жыл бұрын

    Odd. Didn’t see any form of destruction at all. Just a lot of claims. Like many Christian videos.

  • @KingstonHawke
    @KingstonHawke4 жыл бұрын

    This is a clever bit of misdirection. Similar to when Trump pretends as if MS-13 is a huge gang that we all should fear, and then you find out that their national membership in the US at its peak was less than 10,000. That's such a small number, 1% of total gang membership. But if the goal is to go against the thing you must claim you are in favor of (legal immigration in this context, classical feminism in regards to Pangburn) all you have to do is prop up the extremist as if they are a much more significant portion of the group and somehow representative. You see the same thing done with Muslims, the same thing done with blacks, the same thing done with the college liberal who according to Jordan Peterson are all in favor of communism and equality of outcome. It's nonsense. The nature of any and every group with significant membership is that there will be extremists. Jordan's too sick to use his garbage tactics so you are attempting to carry the mantle. But all you are really doing is harming your credibility. Your like to dislike ratio is what it is for a reason. We're the people that like your work and over a quarter of us are shaking our heads at what you're putting out.

  • @dude9318

    @dude9318

    2 жыл бұрын

    Who are you talking too?

  • @LoGos7891
    @LoGos78914 жыл бұрын

    Such brilliant argumentation. There is no better way to persuade someone with whom you disagree than to scream "Ha! You've been OWNED." Give yourself a big smug pat on the back. UNSUBSCRIBE

  • @Pangburn

    @Pangburn

    4 жыл бұрын

    You were never subscribed haha we checked.

  • @thomasslone1964

    @thomasslone1964

    3 жыл бұрын

    you just mad you can't interrupt the video with your highly intellectual wisdom

  • @jameswoods5143

    @jameswoods5143

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yea, you can't argue against facts

  • @thomasslone1964

    @thomasslone1964

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@jameswoods5143 yes you can, facts can be gay sometimes, like when you find out that you in fact have cancer, its pretty gay huh, fuck facts they suck cause they never wrong and only tell you the universe is going to kill you

  • @vexzusdragon8556
    @vexzusdragon85563 жыл бұрын

    Haha 80 Karen's bit on this video.

  • @DIFFICULTENLIGHT
    @DIFFICULTENLIGHT4 жыл бұрын

    You are so confused about what Radical Feminism actually is. SMH

  • @hifibrony

    @hifibrony

    4 жыл бұрын

    No, he's not. I've read MacKinnon and Dworkin, not to mention the shrieking, drooling moron who said that E=Mc2 is a "gendered equation." That may be the single stupidest thing said by anyone not in religious orders or not named Donald Trump. Science and math do NOT work that way.

  • @DIFFICULTENLIGHT

    @DIFFICULTENLIGHT

    4 жыл бұрын

    hifibrony Clueless troll 🙄

  • @hifibrony

    @hifibrony

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@DIFFICULTENLIGHT I am such a troll I have spent many hours online arguing against viciously bigoted TERFs. A friend of mine for 35 years is a transwoman and I am proud to stand for her rights against them.

  • @DIFFICULTENLIGHT

    @DIFFICULTENLIGHT

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@hifibrony Radical Feminism ≠ TERF

  • @gucciboy4555

    @gucciboy4555

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@DIFFICULTENLIGHT if your a radical feminist your a clown

  • @makarenacontreras2892
    @makarenacontreras28924 жыл бұрын

    🤮 a male voice speaking of feminism

  • @Pangburn

    @Pangburn

    4 жыл бұрын

    Your comment is sexist.

  • @makarenacontreras2892

    @makarenacontreras2892

    4 жыл бұрын

    Pangburn also your comment

  • @Pangburn

    @Pangburn

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@makarenacontreras2892 bahaha. How is our comment sexist?

  • @AmberAmber

    @AmberAmber

    4 жыл бұрын

    @Makarena Contreras - I'm 99% you're actually either a *hating b•tches* kind of guy - ●or● a seriously deranged female (I vote the former only cos - I've never heard a real-life women tell men directly that they're being supportive of progress & egalitarian causes is vomit-inducing. I've been privy to a few trolling men however pretending to be women who posted Far Right, very oppressive & repressive religiously & humanistically divisive BS, & had extreme, cruel & irrational beliefs, were rather terfy, & seemed to be *'feminists' for hatred* sorts. Sort yourself mate.

  • @AmberAmber

    @AmberAmber

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Pangburn You're great mate. 99% makarena is a far right religious nut troll & likely male too... this is just another way to sow discord.

Келесі