Professor Donald Hoffman - The Case Against Reality | The Tim Ferriss Show

Тәжірибелік нұсқаулар және стиль

Professor Donald Hoffman - The Case Against Reality, Beyond Spacetime, Rethinking Death, Panpsychism, QBism, and More | Brought to you by FreshBooks cloud-based small business accounting software freshbooks.com/tim and Athletic Greens all-in-one nutritional supplement athleticgreens.com/tim
Donald Hoffman ( @donalddhoffman) received a PhD in computational psychology from MIT and is a Professor Emeritus of Cognitive Sciences at the University of California, Irvine. He is an author of over 120 scientific papers and three books, including The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes. He is the recipient of the Distinguished Scientific Award of the American Psychological Association and the Troland Research Award of the US National Academy of Sciences.
His writing has appeared in Scientific American, New Scientist, LA Review of Books, and Edge, and his work has been featured in Wired, Quanta, The Atlantic, Ars Technica, National Public Radio, Discover Magazine, and Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman. His TED Talk, titled “Do We See Reality as It Is?,” has almost 4M views.
Please enjoy!
00:00 Start
00:32 The Helmholtz Club
06:15 Consciousness defined
15:50 Consciousness research: implications
34:53 Holographic model of the universe
32:28 Possible future technologies
43:53 Conscious agents
01:07:14 Panpsychism
01:14:06 The cosmological polytope
01:21:06 Portals to consciousness
01:37:12 QBism and quantum physics
01:44:51 Current interests
01:51:59 Spiritual connections
02:04:25 Fitness payoff function
Show notes: tim.blog/2022/04/13/donald-ho...
SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/1dSzTkW
LINK TO ALL SHOW TRANSCRIPTS: tim.blog/2018/09/20/all-trans...
About Tim Ferriss:
Tim Ferriss is one of Fast Company’s “Most Innovative Business People” and an early-stage tech investor/advisor in Uber, Facebook, Twitter, Shopify, Duolingo, Alibaba, and 50+ other companies. He is also the author of five #1 New York Times and Wall Street Journal bestsellers: The 4-Hour Workweek, The 4-Hour Body, The 4-Hour Chef, Tools of Titans and Tribe of Mentors. The Observer and other media have named him “the Oprah of audio” due to the influence of his podcast, The Tim Ferriss Show, which has exceeded 500 million downloads and been selected for “Best of Apple Podcasts” three years running.
Connect with Tim Ferriss:
Sign up for "5-Bullet Friday" (Tim's free weekly email newsletter): go.tim.blog/5-bullet-friday-yt/
Visit the Tim Ferriss PODCAST: tim.blog/podcast/
Visit the Tim Ferriss BLOG: tim.blog/
Follow Tim Ferriss on TWITTER: / tferriss
Follow Tim Ferriss on INSTAGRAM: / timferriss
Like Tim Ferriss on FACEBOOK: / timferriss

Пікірлер: 492

  • @timferriss
    @timferriss Жыл бұрын

    Brought to you by FreshBooks cloud-based small business accounting software freshbooks.com/tim and Athletic Greens all-in-one nutritional supplement athleticgreens.com/tim

  • @visancosmin8991

    @visancosmin8991

    Жыл бұрын

    For consciousness, see my papers, like "Meaning and Context: A Brief Introduction".

  • @TheoriesofEverything
    @TheoriesofEverything2 жыл бұрын

    Oh my... Did Tim just reference TOE? As a huge fan, thank you Tim. It's an honor and a blessing. Feel free to reach out. - Curt

  • @kevincoakley6811

    @kevincoakley6811

    2 жыл бұрын

    What's TOE? Please 🥺

  • @Finite8614

    @Finite8614

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@kevincoakley6811 Theories of Everything channel kzread.info

  • @kevincoakley6811

    @kevincoakley6811

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@carneliansound1125 AHH, Thank you! 👍👽

  • @ljohnson7124

    @ljohnson7124

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yes please interview Curt!!

  • @ljohnson7124

    @ljohnson7124

    2 жыл бұрын

    TOE is a podcast by Curt that is excellent on physics, consciousness and the nature of reality, he interviews many great thinkers and goes deep

  • @surrendertoflow78
    @surrendertoflow782 жыл бұрын

    Donald Hoffman! Where were you when I was a frustrated neuroscience grad student/post doc!? As a neuroscientist who always thought materialism fell short when it came to consciousness, I find this interview as refreshing as an oasis in a desert one has been roaming for years.

  • @wisconsinfarmer4742

    @wisconsinfarmer4742

    Жыл бұрын

    I have always viewed those who seek answers though materialistic explanations as clowns.

  • @ljohnson7124
    @ljohnson71242 жыл бұрын

    First talk in 63 years that made me want to be a mathematician

  • @xXEvangelXx

    @xXEvangelXx

    2 жыл бұрын

    Physics is cool.

  • @saransong5547

    @saransong5547

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yes! Lol

  • @lindam6129

    @lindam6129

    2 жыл бұрын

    Me too! I’m watching physics classes on KZread at 64! When you are lucky enough to be born in the Information Age, one lifetime is not enough!!

  • @adamlindfors5082

    @adamlindfors5082

    Жыл бұрын

    I think many people think math and science is boring because school has given them the impression that those subjects are boring and something you just do because you have to. Donald Hoffman is a great example of a academic that dosnt make their subject feel stale and boring but instead intresting and fascinating.

  • @productofsociety4107

    @productofsociety4107

    Жыл бұрын

    @Cypher lmao

  • @bexualhealing
    @bexualhealing2 жыл бұрын

    Honestly, Donald Hoffman’s book blew my mind. I’ve never been the same since reading it. I’d recommend getting Phillip Goff on too, his ideas are pretty interesting

  • @samrowbotham8914

    @samrowbotham8914

    2 жыл бұрын

    It is a very good book the world presented to us through our senses are symbols that the brain creates so we can function in it. However, these symbols are only reflections of the real underlying nature of reality. The qualia is a self-generated brain delusion, we cannot know the ding an sich. There are indigenous people in this world who have no idea what blue means they cannot see it and they have no word in their native tongue to express it. Perceptual psychologists show us that our senses can be tricked which means the brain is making it up this means seeing is not believing its vice versa.

  • @Prophesized1

    @Prophesized1

    2 жыл бұрын

    Get the experience behind the theory. it will blow your mind. meitate ;)

  • @hbinfinity

    @hbinfinity

    Жыл бұрын

    Amazing screen name btw. Or whatever the cool kids are calling it nowadays. #aol

  • @AB-1023
    @AB-10232 жыл бұрын

    This goes in the top ten - of single best podcast episodes I’ve ever heard on the internet. Thanks you guys

  • @igster8293

    @igster8293

    2 жыл бұрын

    Every single podcast with Professor Donald Hoffman on it has been amazing. Thanks for this one!

  • @saransong5547

    @saransong5547

    2 жыл бұрын

    Absolutely same!

  • @AcrylicGoblin

    @AcrylicGoblin

    2 жыл бұрын

    Donald with Lex Friedman is my all time favorite podcast episode. Well, except for Shane mauss returns episode of Pete Holmes, but that's more in the "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" vain.

  • @yourlogicalnightmare1014

    @yourlogicalnightmare1014

    Жыл бұрын

    Hopefully you're a big fan of Bernardo Kastrup then. Which in turn leads to Swami Sarvapriyananda and/or Rupert Spira

  • @Almustafa266

    @Almustafa266

    Жыл бұрын

    @@yourlogicalnightmare1014 Advaita (non dualism ),my way has been the opposite of what you said.

  • @Andrea-us2ge
    @Andrea-us2ge2 жыл бұрын

    IMHO as I am listening to your brilliant conversation, we are immersed in a field of universal and infinite consciousness, that is starting to become aware of itself by waking up each and every particle of itself through communication with each other. And through open communication of more and more brilliant minds such as yours, you will soon be able to prove “scientifically” that there is no death. There is only an expanding Living Consciousness that is based in one single Truth: “There is nothing outside of this One Consciousness of ‘I AM❤️’ ”

  • @yourlogicalnightmare1014

    @yourlogicalnightmare1014

    Жыл бұрын

    Almost correct. It's not 'starting to become aware of itself' from the universal point of view. It has always been aware of itself. From the fractionated viewpoint (you, me, dogs, goats, pigs, rodents, insects, ...) most 'living' entities have instinct, feelings, intention, will, awareness, but they lack 'self' awareness as that is a mental construct they aren't capable of forming. The leap from 'self' awareness to 'universal' awareness is too big a chasm for most humans to cross. We possess a lot of 'conditioned beliefs' that have been solidified over a lifetime, much longer portion of our lifetime than even religious indoctrination. Most science proponents are so dogmatic they refuse to even consider their own direct experience as anything that should be trusted. If they literally met god in the realm of mentation, they would chalk it up to a delusion and check themselves into a mental hospital. Religious zealots insist that ANY awareness that is foreign to their own is satan. Particularly universe travelling aliens, which would be greeted with guns and bombs by christians and muslims. Most humans just aren't capable of getting to your understanding, and they'll be forced to live over and over and over until they do get it.

  • @Andrea-us2ge

    @Andrea-us2ge

    Жыл бұрын

    @@yourlogicalnightmare1014 Thank you for your amazing insight that it has always been aware of itself. Of course! The Universe inside of me is rejoicing in your brilliant logic!🥳 PS: You are not at all a nightmare!😂….More like a ‘LogicalEnlightenment’😊😇😉

  • @chrisbennett6260

    @chrisbennett6260

    Жыл бұрын

    thats a thought

  • @jessewallace12able
    @jessewallace12able2 жыл бұрын

    I really appreciate how this talk with Donald Hoffman went. Ive watched many interviews and talks with him; this one was particularly special- Tim you were able to get to some more sophisticated points with out over doing intellectualism. Enjoyed it! The big picture description of what’s going sounds exactly like Alan Watt’s explanation of the basically Hindu worldview

  • @AcrylicGoblin

    @AcrylicGoblin

    2 жыл бұрын

    I've also noticed the similarities between Donald's theories and Alan's talks regarding Hinduism. Great stuff.

  • @paulbrandon422

    @paulbrandon422

    2 жыл бұрын

    Not so much Hinduism as Advaita Vedanta. Hinduism is a very loosely defined set of many traditions that exist under one umbrella. Hinduism, as a religion, came after the Vedas. They accept the Vedas as authority, but they are not really the Vedas. Rather, they are a set of traditions that has roots in the Vedas.

  • @jiyoonlee2464
    @jiyoonlee24642 жыл бұрын

    This is incredible. I am in awe of the great minds we see here and hear about from this conversation- thank you thank you thank you. This is the conversation I’ve been searching for & Donald so eloquently articulates our shared frustration with the physicalist framework in science and dogmatism in spirituality among so many other things. Thank you Donald for sharing your work, thoughts, feelings and more- your presence. Thank you Tim also for yours and your effort in curating this. Please have more conversations & share so we-the witness- could learn and grow as individuals and also as culture. May you and your loved ones be happy and healthy 💚🙏💚

  • @vicvic2081

    @vicvic2081

    2 жыл бұрын

    Stay humble

  • @AB-1023
    @AB-1023 Жыл бұрын

    Hoffman’s hypotheses are gonna go to a whole new level when he finally tries psychedelics

  • @controllerbrain

    @controllerbrain

    Жыл бұрын

    @Lutz That makes sense.

  • @barbarafairbanks4578

    @barbarafairbanks4578

    Жыл бұрын

    @Lutz I think you are right about that.

  • @controllerbrain

    @controllerbrain

    Жыл бұрын

    @@inveele 😂 nice one!

  • @mmiaxx2002

    @mmiaxx2002

    Жыл бұрын

    This level of metaphysical insight only comes from physcotropic interfacing. Those of us who have rangered in the trip world, this all sounds very familiar.

  • @Stratton218

    @Stratton218

    Жыл бұрын

    That’s what I’m saying. Would love to trip with this guy for suree

  • @angiehewerdine
    @angiehewerdine2 жыл бұрын

    What a fantastic conversation. I love listening to Donald Hoffman, and I think this may be my favorite interview yet. It was a wonderful way to spend the evening!

  • @GiedriusMisiukas
    @GiedriusMisiukas2 жыл бұрын

    Highly underrated Donald Hoffman's interview. So many good points and info in this one. And then the thought at 2:03:20, insightful. And 2:10:10 :)

  • @bradharris5306
    @bradharris53062 жыл бұрын

    Thanks, Gentlemen- Great conversation! The Tesla quote "The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence" seems to apply. Thanks for the contribution

  • @mishomaisuradze8205

    @mishomaisuradze8205

    2 жыл бұрын

    Haha, i was going to quote the same, tesla was the only man who understood this shit even at that time 😀 imho

  • @lindam6129

    @lindam6129

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yes and that’s why I think the portals he speaks of will have something to do with vibrations and/or frequency. Maybe we need to resonate at some same level as the greater reality..

  • @tulipanvandor6651

    @tulipanvandor6651

    2 жыл бұрын

    at the end, if not love, does not make any sense..

  • @s.muller8688

    @s.muller8688

    Жыл бұрын

    Where, exactly, is the beginning of a circle?

  • @digit313

    @digit313

    Жыл бұрын

    Tesla was a genius.

  • @estabi
    @estabi2 жыл бұрын

    1:00:40 - 1:01:40 is another (very good) explanation of what Alan Watts called the Dramatic Model of the Universe which itself is a translation of Vedic philosophy. "All the world`s a stage .." and Consciousness (or God if you prefer) is so caught up in Playing that It forgets that it's a Show and mistakes Itself for the Persona (or mask or appearance) that it is Playing. That mistaking of the Appearance with Reality/Consciousness is who we appear to be and yet we are the very Show itself, all of It, in every moment.

  • @clemsonalum98
    @clemsonalum982 жыл бұрын

    Hoffman is awesome.

  • @ljohnson7124
    @ljohnson71242 жыл бұрын

    This is one of my fav interviews with Donald Hoffman ever! Thrilling *

  • @ang5972
    @ang59722 жыл бұрын

    I loved u having DON HOFFMAN ON!!! More people like him please!

  • @bjenkin100

    @bjenkin100

    2 жыл бұрын

    good point-- I agree, i listen to Donald all i can- he's got some great ones on Youtbe- long ones too... only problem when you say "more like him " is that even though there's interesting folks out there, we dont have too many people around like D. Hoffman ... and very few as interesting.

  • @TheProphetofLogic
    @TheProphetofLogic Жыл бұрын

    As a student of Tibetan Buddhism, this is right down my alley. I had a 2 month long DMT trip..(I was in a altered state after taking psycodelics and my family called the paramedics. The medics not knowing what I was on gave me a dissasosiave SSRI, prolongeing my trip. Before this, in an another event, I had returned from neurological death, so that's why my family called the paramedics.) .... it's a long story and if you want to know the whole thing I am glad to share...but I experienced the beginning of reality during the trip. (Later I have confirmation it wasn't just in my head. I was sent to the opposite side of the earth to meet people who tell me without any information from me that it Was the birth of the universe I partook in!) ---So, God was in the state of primordial bliss that the Hindus described as the first state of being... God asked 'what am I?' bliss being the only answer because God was all there was...so God asked next 'what am I not?' and BOOM! This duality happened, when what God is collides with what God is not making the illusion we are in. Yen/Yang etc. Eventually the illusion will become selfrealized and God will have the Answer. Well, that was my experience. Thanks for this great show! ✨

  • @Sridarsh

    @Sridarsh

    Жыл бұрын

    i have a question, why do you think because u went to the other side of the world and the people there confirmed it, still not be something made inside your head? also the first stage in hinduism, do you mean the being in oneness with the supreme being, the result of moksha?

  • @simplysavvylife

    @simplysavvylife

    Жыл бұрын

    Very interesting, if you ever type out or make a video about your story I'd love to read/hear/watch it !

  • @simplysavvylife

    @simplysavvylife

    Жыл бұрын

    I had a neat trip where I knew I didn't need my body or to breathe to exist . That I and all that is is merely the imagination of consciousness with the illusion of a solid reality. I pictured oneness of consciousness then it dripping like an ooze or liquid, each drop, a differentiation of consciousness, individuation, but each drop still connected and becoming itself from the one primary "mass" by becoming more differentiated as it "dripped" "down and away from the mass. Some drips and drops intersected at some points as our lives do. It was just a visual representation of how consciousness makes it way from oneness to individuation while still being one. Each person or different consciousness would be representes by each drop , the perspective from each drop is different and the consciousness experiences and observes itself in this way, not realizing in it's more fully segregated form that it is still itself and so is all it sees. I felt no fear of death and almost felt like I was alive without breathing.

  • @TheProphetofLogic

    @TheProphetofLogic

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Sridarsh Well, the Western mystics say: " As above, so below." In Eastern traditions, it is similar: " What is outside is also inside." So yes, it's in my head, but the implications are profound, it would imply reality is in my head... it's a very deep rabbit hole. Beginning and result are paradoxically intertwined. The beginning is the end, the first is the last. You will understand at some point.

  • @TheProphetofLogic

    @TheProphetofLogic

    Жыл бұрын

    @@simplysavvylife Thanks, I will but it's not a easy decision... and not sure about how to present it. Any suggestions? I don't want to start a new religion. But I sorta am a Avatar because of what happened and weird stuff is always happening. I live in Spain and a toddler maybe 3 years old walking past me says " Buddha, Buddha!" And points his finger at the sky. And his parent says "yes, Buddah common." And keeps walking away. Another time, I'm walking down a road and a little kid 4-5 years old points at me yelling "Allah! Allah!" . And many other things like that. Three different individuals met me in southern Spain saying that they were sent to find me and a sect of Sufis performed a ritual because I was somebody they were expecting to show up, but my mission is to END religion not promote one. They think I'm Mahdi, but if I am, I can't support the sacrifice of animals, so I denounced the act of killing animals and suddenly they don't want me anymore despite the 46 prophecies I fulfilled. You can appreciate the irony. And I am a long way from perfect. Perfection comes After judgment day and while I remember it, it hasn't happened yet in linear time but my future self is looking after me. Yes, crazy... it's why I like having Outside confirmation. Keeps the loonies on the path. I have one message for you: learn Magic and Use it to recreate the world. I know magic is real, I know that the beings who control the world believe in magic and use it against our evolution. If I am what I appear to be, than I'm a catalyst to make us God. The more of us using Magic, the better. The world is ours, and magic is our birthright, don't let anyone tell you otherwise. My spiritual name is Kalki Dasa (pronounced 'Doss') if you want to meet up in the astral. Thanks again.

  • @goodleshoes
    @goodleshoes2 жыл бұрын

    Donald! You mentioned that you're reading Eckhart tolle and I read his work before discovering yours and I was initially awestruck by how similar his concepts and perspective on consciousness is to your findings! When I first heard your book my jaw dropped because I had only recently read his book before yours and wow it really is the same exact thing but he came to those realizations through self reflection and yours were from hard science. It's just so crazy to me how at a fundamental level you are positing the same conclusions! I'm not sure how much more his work would reveal from you but you're on the same track!

  • @astonesthrow

    @astonesthrow

    Жыл бұрын

    Meister Eckhart is different from Eckhart Tolle. I recommend Manly P Hall's lecture on Meister Eckhart here on youtube. Insane.

  • @astonesthrow

    @astonesthrow

    Жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/k3mDrtB_XdbNhtY.html

  • @controllerbrain

    @controllerbrain

    Жыл бұрын

    @@astonesthrow 1:55:35

  • @astonesthrow

    @astonesthrow

    Жыл бұрын

    @@controllerbrain Hoffman is the man

  • @kbone8137
    @kbone8137 Жыл бұрын

    The whole discussion put forth by Hoffman very much resonates with Realization at its deepest of depths. It is very much aligned. It makes perfect sense that he is a meditator (though not the only path to such realizations), but the discussion is focusing on HOW Consciousness IS primary and how it informs mind. Know ThySelf via negativa. I was impressed by how Hoffman was able to thread scientific terminology to point to it. Well done.

  • @lancejones4636
    @lancejones46362 жыл бұрын

    If you embrace the possibility of what Donald suggests and that of others with similar thinking (Bernardo Kastrup, Rupert Spira), it comes with profound changes to how you look at life and death.

  • @ljohnson7124

    @ljohnson7124

    2 жыл бұрын

    Oh golly yes please interview Bernardo

  • @ljohnson7124

    @ljohnson7124

    2 жыл бұрын

    @♜Pínned_By Tim Fērríss Massive fan love to

  • @voolproov

    @voolproov

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yeah, especially the concept of consciousness trying out different lifeforms like suits.. that sounds strikingly like reincarnation. Either the old Buddhists knew more than we do, or some modern researchers have borrowed ideas from them.

  • @kenjoneslee

    @kenjoneslee

    2 жыл бұрын

    Humans are NOT supposed to see the fundamental reality of the world because then they would "opt" out of participation on Earth.

  • @SunnyDayTeaFactory

    @SunnyDayTeaFactory

    2 жыл бұрын

    can you explain for layman? please?

  • @The_Primary_Axiom
    @The_Primary_Axiom Жыл бұрын

    This guy got me looking at reality completely differently ever since I heard him on Lex Fridman.

  • @dragonsmith9012
    @dragonsmith90122 жыл бұрын

    I'm so thankful Professor Hoffman is better now. I got so caught up with enthusiasm for the work he's helped advance that it never occured to me... I won't complete that thought. It's been a hell of a couple of years, but we who are fortunate enough to still be here got to keep trucking. ❤

  • @HatemAlSibai
    @HatemAlSibai2 жыл бұрын

    Amazing & Fabulous. I have no words to do this discussion justice. Great contribution to the relentless search for the fundamental. Thank you both.

  • @BillHeilmannfritz

    @BillHeilmannfritz

    Жыл бұрын

    Advaita Vedenta

  • @Dani68ABminus
    @Dani68ABminus2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you to both for a wonderful two hours! I very much look forward to the next discussion with Prof. Hoffman.

  • @kevincoakley6811

    @kevincoakley6811

    2 жыл бұрын

    I agree! I too look forward to the next discussion with prof. Hoffman too.👍

  • @Jay_Teacher
    @Jay_Teacher2 жыл бұрын

    “Nothing in space and time has any causal powers. Nothing. Everything in space and time are merely perceptions within consciousness.” That pretty much sums it up. 😚

  • @gesrom5685

    @gesrom5685

    2 жыл бұрын

    Doesn't it sound very mystical? Consciousness is a tail chasing itself. The Upanishads are much easier to read. What say you?

  • @anson_phong
    @anson_phong Жыл бұрын

    ⛩️👁️✨ This is one of the best podcasts I've heard recently. Hoffman is one of the only scientists I've heard who creates a solid bridge to mysticism without mentioning any mystical concepts. Very profound and insightful.

  • @loveofinquiry8067

    @loveofinquiry8067

    Жыл бұрын

    Mysticism is on the other side of the bridge😉

  • @PeterKoperdan
    @PeterKoperdan2 жыл бұрын

    Looking forward to see how Tim is going to tackle this challenging topic..

  • @mstrG
    @mstrG2 жыл бұрын

    I need Donald Hoffman podcast. I'm drawn to his ideas.

  • @aspieboy74
    @aspieboy74 Жыл бұрын

    All is conscious, all is mind. There is no such thing as objective reality, but there is consensus reality.

  • @McPocalypsus
    @McPocalypsus2 жыл бұрын

    Absolutely fascinating conversation!

  • @user-vr9qb5rj4j
    @user-vr9qb5rj4j2 жыл бұрын

    It was just one of the most fascinating conversations I have listen to on this channel!!! Infinite thanks to you Tim. And Donald Hoffman was an incredible guest! No more words. Pure gold. Thank you all)

  • @Matt-os5ho
    @Matt-os5ho Жыл бұрын

    Regarding the hallucinogenic part, my opinion is that the brain itself processes reality through a limited aperture much like a camera. Certain chemical substances cause the aperture to relax and widen allowing conscious appreciation of other out of previously perceived dimensions. The same effect can be caused by exhaustion or sleep deprivation to a degree of potency.

  • @paulatreides0777

    @paulatreides0777

    7 ай бұрын

    exactly or I say the brain filters consciousness to a level we can cope with day to day.

  • @suzannesimmons1296
    @suzannesimmons1296 Жыл бұрын

    I Love Love Love this! I totally understand! I understand conceptually completely. I understand scientifically at an Intro college level. I understand & experience at a spiritual level. Hoffman is brave! Hoffman is more than "on to something"! Go Don! Thank you!! Love it!

  • @danalexander186

    @danalexander186

    Жыл бұрын

    Would you be interested in understanding more? Just wondering. If anyone would take the time to see what I know, it will change their entire life. The answers aren’t going to come in detail from anyone who’s know as a professional.. they are already in a level of disconnect to the depth.. that’s why they at most say things like illusion or simulation. There’s more to it than that. I had a near death experience in 1998 and have been reaching out to everyone I possibly can for the last 5 years as in 2018 there was an even deeper and more profound revelation.. as unbelievable as I know it sounds, I remember the beginning of time and can explain it to anyone with the attention span to listen. The biggest issue is that it goes against EVERYTHING society is hooked on doing. If I could speak with Mr. Hoffman or someone with that level of public exposure, it would change the face of our world. I say it because I mean it. Hopefully you aren’t offended that I commented on your post. I have a lot to teach and no one willing to listen because I don’t play the “certified professional” game. God bless. Have a great day.

  • @andreeap.6402

    @andreeap.6402

    Жыл бұрын

    @@danalexander186 I am interested 🙂

  • @thewalkthrougher6556

    @thewalkthrougher6556

    Жыл бұрын

    @@danalexander186 I'm interested too

  • @GiedriusMisiukas
    @GiedriusMisiukas2 жыл бұрын

    Glad to know Donald finally got out of covid

  • @align2source
    @align2source Жыл бұрын

    A true scientist is without dogma, still kind of rare, David Hoffman seems to be one... Thanks for this interview!

  • @victorvispetto2367
    @victorvispetto23672 жыл бұрын

    So I have listened to this podcast and other's with Donald Hoffman going on at least 10 times or more. Finally sinking in somewhat... I remain fascinated...

  • @deborahrobinson8802
    @deborahrobinson88022 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant conversation. Strongly supportive of Alan Watts' ideas.

  • @MrJosh6889
    @MrJosh68892 жыл бұрын

    The idea of an inherent electronic field controlling a person's lifelong morphogenesis is a brilliant idea for a dystopian horror novel.

  • @ladygrace2741

    @ladygrace2741

    2 жыл бұрын

    Just like the one playing out right before our eyes.

  • @shawnpalmer6715
    @shawnpalmer67152 жыл бұрын

    i like this person he explains it simply - and with enthusiasm

  • @assirianelson9113
    @assirianelson9113 Жыл бұрын

    Amazing! Thank you both.

  • @jmanathisfinest
    @jmanathisfinest Жыл бұрын

    Mark my words, Donald Hoffman will be as well known as Einstein is now in 100 years.

  • @delphinebrooks5110
    @delphinebrooks51102 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much...we are living fascinating times

  • @laurakelly631
    @laurakelly6312 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for such an excellent interview! I will be listening more than once. Just one thing that jumps out at me at this moment...At around 1:45 where he begins to talk about various spiritual traditions/ having insights but not necessarily being able to 'evolve or develop them in a way that is useful or meaningful (my lacking paraphrase) - he refers to the need for mathematics for that. That kind of blows my mind a bit and I need to study that more. But I think of stages of cognitive/cultural development as outlined by people in transpersonal psychology such as Ken Wilber. Having insights but only being able to cognize them through the lens of one's developmental stage.

  • @dls8486
    @dls8486 Жыл бұрын

    Your videos are so wonderful Kandace, thank you so much! I can’t wait to try this! I’ve just started medical medium protocol in the last two weeks but I’ll be trying this is soon as I get acclimated.I also have a question, for other family members that are not on medical medium do you think it would be helpful for them to take these shots even though they are not on the protocol?

  • @JGjdg74
    @JGjdg746 ай бұрын

    Hoffman is my FAVORITE person to listen to talk. 😊😊😊❤❤❤

  • @deepagodbole25
    @deepagodbole252 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic Information and Presentation. TU both.

  • @simplysavvylife
    @simplysavvylife Жыл бұрын

    True science and spirituality are not antithetical, they are complimentary. They are different approaches to understanding and appreciating our experience of life as we know it. Great talk!

  • @szymborska
    @szymborska2 жыл бұрын

    32:39 Very zen move, "So that's why I don't believe my own theory."

  • @DavidDietz38
    @DavidDietz382 жыл бұрын

    This podcast has every one of my brain cells working in overdrive - and i'm only comprehending about 25% of what they're talking about.

  • @bumblebeme

    @bumblebeme

    2 жыл бұрын

    hes saying time and space are not real. The present moment has only ever existed

  • @kenjoneslee

    @kenjoneslee

    2 жыл бұрын

    I'm 62 and no scientist...but I already developed these exact same ideas of Donald's. He makes perfect logical sense to me.

  • @PowPowSunshine100

    @PowPowSunshine100

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@bumblebeme Thank you, great summary! I've tried listening to a few of these interviews, but I can't seem to merge all of Professor Hoffman's scattered phrases into one coherent philosophy.

  • @bumblebeme

    @bumblebeme

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@PowPowSunshine100 its not just him saying it all the great meditators have intimate experience with the infinite now. It means whatever happened last week never happened all that exists and has ever existed it right now. We keep the information from the past inside the mind but its just imagination.

  • @PowPowSunshine100

    @PowPowSunshine100

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@bumblebeme No, I get it, thanks to your succinct explanation. I decided long ago that there is no such thing as time, everything happens at once, in a nutshell. But I just can't follow Donald Hoffman's thought process, guess that's my failing. 🙂

  • @adriand7949
    @adriand79492 жыл бұрын

    He is very careful to avoid bringing up Advaita Vedanta, the school of thought that beat him to these ideas by thousands of years. The whole “Spacetime is a projection and not base reality” is fundamental to much of Indian philosophy and not a new idea whatsoever. It is very interesting to see science beginning to point back toward what the greatest spiritual philosophers have said for millennia.

  • @zilla7444

    @zilla7444

    2 жыл бұрын

    Ok but personally, I haven't heard of Advaita Vedanta so this conversation has been refreshing. Your comment reminds me of Ecclesiates ... What has been will be again, and what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Is there a case where one can say, “Look, this is new”? It has already existed in the ages before us. There is no remembrance of those who came before, and those yet to come will not be remembered by those who follow after. ... Fascinating that chapter one ends with "For with much wisdom comes much sorrow, and as knowledge grows, grief increases." Thanks for your comment that prompted me to remember Solomon's words. Peace to you.

  • @gesrom5685

    @gesrom5685

    2 жыл бұрын

    Right on. I'm so eager to merge with universal consciousness and detach from this aching, aging body...

  • @SLefd

    @SLefd

    2 жыл бұрын

    I was wondering all the time why he didn't mention those old hinduistic thoughts. Had to conclude he didn't know about them, which seems strange.. ?

  • @rahulkaul14

    @rahulkaul14

    Жыл бұрын

    In his conversation with lex Friedman, he does mention the concept of "Maya" and the yogis have been claiming same/similar. I think he wants to steer clear of that conversation for obvious reason. He himself has been meditating for 2 decades now.

  • @adriand7949

    @adriand7949

    Жыл бұрын

    @@zilla7444 That happens to be among my favorite books of the Bible, maybe number 1.

  • @lolasaint7370
    @lolasaint7370 Жыл бұрын

    Absolutely Brilliant .!!!.Many Thanks for sharing such Valuable Information !!

  • @LoloOoo453
    @LoloOoo4532 жыл бұрын

    fantastic discussion! thank you! vipassana meditation would answer beautifully to many points in this dialog. must go beyond the thinker.that is a good portal into the interface. would accelerate the research.

  • @haroonaverroes6537

    @haroonaverroes6537

    2 жыл бұрын

    the apes speak different language ! your sick irrational senile is a thief ! the apes attract each other ! unbelievable not humans !

  • @pedalstrkrmtb7716

    @pedalstrkrmtb7716

    2 жыл бұрын

    Donald Hoffman is an admitted meditator!

  • @timw3241
    @timw3241 Жыл бұрын

    Tom Campbell is another pioneer in this field and it’s highly recommended to anyone interested in this subject. I’m surprised his name didn’t come up in the podcast. Nonetheless, this was a excellent conversation.

  • @weaverdreams

    @weaverdreams

    Жыл бұрын

    I dont think he makes any sense. I think William Buhlman would be a good addition.

  • @anngerrard6364
    @anngerrard63642 жыл бұрын

    This morning feeling distraught about the insanity in the world especially Europe at the moment, and Americas not looking too clever if you’re a woman, either. Love listening to Donald Hoffman and, having been a practising Buddhist for nigh on 30 years(but the dogma got me in the end) I came to his ideas through a spiritual(sorry Tim) interest.To hear him reference Eckhart Tolle (he seems to me to be a “spiritual teacher” with out dogma) was beyond exciting. Please have a dialogue with each other.😁😁😁👍 The world needs wisdom and science if it is going to wake up and stop all this madness. Fundamentally science and spirituality’s value can only be measured, I feel, by it’s ability to change the world for the better, where we can learn to choose love and wisdom. Thank you both for a mesmerising dialogue. Ann Gerrard

  • @kimberlyanndeangelo7584
    @kimberlyanndeangelo75842 жыл бұрын

    My deepest desire is indescribable For words would lay her Dark-hole-pigeoned Bruised wings under skin My deepest desire Wears no color Smokes no fire For she has no view for perception No lungs to taste resin My deepest desire Rests in the Womb And drinks the Liquid Sound Of Wisdom~~~ Thank you for this conversation.

  • @ElinT13
    @ElinT13 Жыл бұрын

    I love that Prof. Hoffman is open to pushback and testing of his theory, because this kind of science is what we all need: bold and courageous enough not to rule out other things that up to now were not accepted in any scientific context (like spirituality), respectful and yet always critical with all findings. We need to think much broader and yet be more open for critical evaluation of all scientific results instead of holding on to theories just because the scientists who came up with them are/were being venerated or because the theory has been accepted and established. As Prof. Hoffman is saying, we probably will be laughing at our theories of today in a 100 years. Excellent content, thank you so much! I will have to listen to it several times to kind of grasp at least the rough ideas ... if I might be able to. ;-)

  • @carolbailey1325
    @carolbailey13252 жыл бұрын

    I wonder what Professor Hoffman might think about the concept of morphic resonance and Rupert Sheldrake. Sheldrake wrote a book as well The Science Delusion pointing out the dogmatic materialistic foundation of mainstream science.

  • @hopenkwelle8874
    @hopenkwelle88742 жыл бұрын

    Wow! Minute 22:11 @TimFerriss in awe after hearing that space time is not fundamental 😅! EPIC look on your face, I loved it! I wonder, can you share what was going through your mind in those seconds?

  • @BillHeilmannfritz
    @BillHeilmannfritz Жыл бұрын

    Don I'm sure he studied at Advaita Vedanta. it's Hindu philosophy of non-dualism. What Don is discussing and proposing is exactly this a 5,000-year-old philosophy from the upanishads. Highly recommended reading it correlates exactly what Donald is discussing about consciousness and that the world is an illusion. Great guest, he's on the right path. 🙏

  • @ricardosabatino3172
    @ricardosabatino31722 жыл бұрын

    Once you go deep enough science, psychodelic drugs and spirituality all meet at the same point: we are conciousness, the bodies are just a vehicle.

  • @SunnyDayTeaFactory

    @SunnyDayTeaFactory

    2 жыл бұрын

    We are living in the kali yuga.

  • @ricardosabatino3172

    @ricardosabatino3172

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@SunnyDayTeaFactory Yes we are

  • @marylaporte6996

    @marylaporte6996

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@SunnyDayTeaFactory After listening to this, there is hope that we are coming out of this dark age. Physicalism is no longer primary.

  • @shawnpalmer6715

    @shawnpalmer6715

    2 жыл бұрын

    recall hearing the quip that would shed the body but i need it for transportation

  • @SunnyDayTeaFactory

    @SunnyDayTeaFactory

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@marylaporte6996 Though destabilizing at first, it has made me tune into this life more, and honor and respect it more...to truly honor our time here. Have a great day!

  • @MeeshGuitar
    @MeeshGuitar2 жыл бұрын

    Thanks Tim.

  • @jeremytang8819
    @jeremytang88192 жыл бұрын

    Professor Hoffman, I think your work is like the incompleteness theorem of empiricism similar to the godel incompleteness theorem. The implications to the scientific method is deep.

  • @suzannesimmons1296
    @suzannesimmons1296 Жыл бұрын

    I've wondered for sometime if the reason exercise changes our bodies is the act of exercising keeps the mind focusing on changing the body...

  • @ibrahimalfaleh3359
    @ibrahimalfaleh33592 жыл бұрын

    Tim is such a likable guy.

  • @jeremytang8819
    @jeremytang88192 жыл бұрын

    Professor Hoffman, is it possible to artificially evolve a single sensor on an AI machine for maybe the detection of magnetism such that the fitness payoff is to match "reality" and then it can "teach" humans what it learnt? There is the problem of physically evolving the sensor hardware too and 3d printing cannot modify the sensor itself which requires the discovery or invention of novel materials?

  • @markcampbell9227
    @markcampbell92272 жыл бұрын

    I would love to hear Donald Hoffman's take on The Origins and History of Consciousness by Erich Neumann which is based on Carl Jung's life work.

  • @ezytyres8900
    @ezytyres89009 ай бұрын

    Yep, it’s true I’ve shared a vision with a friend, either our brain function was super fast working on suggestions or we experienced the same things simultaneously. There is definitely something more deeper to consciousness than our intellect can comprehend

  • @CavalieriTom
    @CavalieriTom2 жыл бұрын

    Does this definition makes sense? It's from Ayn Rqnd: Consciousness is the faculty of awareness-the faculty of perceiving that which exists. Awareness is not a passive state, but an active process. On the lower levels of awareness, a complex neurological process is required to enable man to experience a sensation and to integrate sensations into percepts; that process is automatic and non-volitional: man is aware of its results, but not of the process itself. On the higher, conceptual level, the process is psychological, conscious and volitional. In either case, awareness is achieved and maintained by continuous action. Directly or indirectly, every phenomenon of consciousness is derived from one’s awareness of the external world. Some object, i.e., some content, is involved in every state of awareness. Extrospection is a process of cognition directed outward-a process of apprehending some existent(s) of the external world. Introspection is a process of cognition directed inward-a process of apprehending one’s own psychological actions in regard to some existent(s) of the external world, such actions as thinking, feeling, reminiscing, etc. It is only in relation to the external world that the various actions of a consciousness can be experienced, grasped, defined or communicated. Awareness is awareness of something. A content-less state of consciousness is a contradiction in terms.

  • @kevincoakley6811

    @kevincoakley6811

    2 жыл бұрын

    You didn't have to write all that! But !!! Yes you are right!😎

  • @CavalieriTom

    @CavalieriTom

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@kevincoakley6811 👍🏻it’s just a matter of logic.

  • @kenjoneslee

    @kenjoneslee

    2 жыл бұрын

    Exactly.....stuff exists to provide experience to consciousness. That's the purpose of "stuff".

  • @controllerbrain
    @controllerbrain Жыл бұрын

    This is amazing.

  • @deepagodbole25
    @deepagodbole252 жыл бұрын

    Why is Mathematical evidence so important and final. After all Mathematics is a human construct and in a way Metaphysics itself.

  • @chrish8212
    @chrish82122 жыл бұрын

    Nice, for a second i though i was going to have to slog through a lex freidman interview with this guy, ill take Tim any day ...

  • @saransong5547

    @saransong5547

    Жыл бұрын

    I did that and would highly not recommend it, lol. I do recommend the Jitender Kumar interview with Hoffman, both part 1 and 2.

  • @saransong5547

    @saransong5547

    Жыл бұрын

    This is the first one.. kzread.info/dash/bejne/ooR-vM-YXbKxgZs.html the second one is best.

  • @saransong5547

    @saransong5547

    Жыл бұрын

    Part 2 kzread.info/dash/bejne/Z658xtOYksSYh5s.html very good

  • @mlaine83
    @mlaine832 жыл бұрын

    Can we please get Donald Hoffman and Stephen Wolfram into a room together.

  • @AtypicalPaul
    @AtypicalPaul2 жыл бұрын

    Great conversation

  • @chrisbennett6260
    @chrisbennett6260 Жыл бұрын

    fascinating perspective

  • @SuperColdLemonade
    @SuperColdLemonade2 жыл бұрын

    Awesome. I suppose, without having seen a single one of the other episodes on this channel, that this is by far the best episode on the whole channel and will always be. Thanks for sharing this =)

  • @elmerbaez6784
    @elmerbaez6784 Жыл бұрын

    What a wonderful ideal experience!!!

  • @heikom7646
    @heikom7646 Жыл бұрын

    Tim, you should talk with Rupert Spira. Would love to listen to this conversation.

  • @user-eq6sj9rj2z
    @user-eq6sj9rj2z7 ай бұрын

    ❤ I'm so excited about talking. I forgot to mention depends on the type of person. Person that can't handle their emotions should never do anything. I real strong-minded person can handle quite a bit. Well, I think you yet my draft. I have seen and watched so many. That's why I never did. It but I wrote down a lot of information that I found extremely fascinating. Of course In a course in the 60s, they were the sixties. And of course I did try drugs. Some never overdid it but wrote down a lot of creative

  • @kenf.1575
    @kenf.1575 Жыл бұрын

    I think it would be interesting to see someone organize a discussion with Donald Hoffman and Tom Campbell.

  • @2kt2000
    @2kt20002 жыл бұрын

    Around 59 mins in, his concepts sound VERY reminiscent of Tom Campbell. They always have as I follow both Hoffman & Campbell, but this is the first time I've heard his purpose for consciousness so closely aligned to Cambells.. though they're still apart... so many similarities in theory & practices too... they both Always say don't believe em and be skeptical. Love it.. thx for the vid 👍

  • @vpconroy

    @vpconroy

    2 жыл бұрын

    I think you meant to write JOESEPH Campbell, the mythologist (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Campbell)

  • @thienf

    @thienf

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@vpconroy He does mean Tom Campbell see kzread.info/dash/bejne/jIWWybSgnKa7YM4.html

  • @kenf.1575

    @kenf.1575

    Жыл бұрын

    I think it would be interesting to see someone organize a discussion with Donald Hoffman and Tom Campbell.

  • @louisasabrinasusienehalver2396
    @louisasabrinasusienehalver23962 жыл бұрын

    Omg...we are totally related....as I this ego construction.at this time.... You are spot on our crazy truth .... right now! LOL I totally understand...how can anyone really explain this... TRUE shit! My kittens and I are all laughing right now.... and we don't need no words too totally understand! True... it's all true... just hard too explain using cognatic words! Thanks bro....I feel seen and understood by another human right now.... and it is always eventually.... and even always now.... about our Emotionally significant experiences++memories.... along these same Emotionally significant.premises! Hugs and kisses a million thanks!

  • @supercal333
    @supercal333 Жыл бұрын

    You need to define what you mean when you say 'when we're not looking'. What is 'observation' when you say nothing is there until you look.

  • @professormaxtrinity
    @professormaxtrinity Жыл бұрын

    I don't have a TOE but, I do have conservation of unity theory that is foundational to consciousness and to the notion of consciousness as a foundation for physical experience. Reciprocal Philosophy Reciprocal philosophy is a branch of the greater discipline of Reciprocal Science. Reciprocal Science is based in the combined perspective of unity, relationship and action. The basic tenets of Reciprocal philosophy are: 1.) All of awareness is based on reciprocating relationship, a single action with a simultaneous two-way reference. For ex. A dimension has two simultaneous references like, up and down or left and right. A dimension is a reciprocating relationship. The two simultaneous references for awareness are self-assertion and self-reception (self-sensing). The relationship between self-assertion/self-sensing is the action of awareness, showing awareness to be a reciprocating relationship. 2.) Life is an infinite, eternal, unified state of self-awareness. 3.) Life is self-generating, self-originating, self-referring and self-reciprocating. It is self-organizing, self-learning and self-taught 4.) The action of Life, which is living, is acausal, synchronistic, non-sequenced and continuous. Awareness is the action of living. 5.) The unbroken ground of simple self-awareness is the most solid comprehension in conscious experience and is the basis of all that exists. 6.) Physicality is the most measurable and therefore most predictable arrangements or patterns of awareness. Non-physicality is the most un-measurable and therefore unpredictable arrangements or patterns of awareness. These two orientations of awareness arrangements reciprocate each other in the relationship between the infinite and the finite The physical orientations of life and the non-physical orientations of life reciprocate each other in the transmutation of infinite non-physical possibilities into finite physical manifestations. Imagination is the conceptual state, the state of conception, in which this relationship is occurring. 7.) The Human-we is the collective of humanity that has and does and will inhabit the Earth and is a living unified expression of human meaning. 8.) Human awareness is based in simple self- awareness (SSA) spatial awareness (SA) and rational self-awareness (RSA). RSA is the state of consciousness that holds the potential for the personal experience of cosmic self-awareness (CSA). (Note: see glossary for definitions of orientations of awareness.) 9.) In light of unity, anything that affects one human affects all of humanity as a whole. All human activity affects all humans. 10.) Friendship is the most basic and therefore the most integral and highest form of human relationship. 11.) Love is pure receptivity. Love freely allows all. Freedom is pure assertion. Freedom expresses all. Love loves freedom for expressing all for love to receive and Freedom loves Love for freely allowing all that freedom has to express. This is the reciprocating relationship between Love and Freedom which is the action of living, the origin of our own being and self-awareness. We live every moment of our existence in this beautiful relationship. 12.) Unity is the prevalent and most revealing state of being. Unity is an orientation of awareness and is available as a point of view and experience to human consciousness as individuals and collectives. Mystery is the prevalent and most un-revealing state of being. Mystery is an orientation of awareness and is available as a point of view to human consciousness as individuals and collectives. ( Unity = 1 and Mystery = 0. Note the relationship between 1 and 0 and the creative nature of each. The organizational capacity of binary code is what makes it “sacred math”. 1 and 0 reciprocate each other in information ordering. 1, 0 are a pair, a constant 2. Since the individual and shared states are constant, there is also a constant of 3, 0 and 1 are embedded in 2 and 0,1 and 2 are embedded in 3. This is all the code needed to generate physicality and transmutate the constant and immeasurable into the temporal and measurable. Conceptualization, conceiving of pattern, form and relationship, is utilizing this code. Any generation of concept has this code embedded in it. Primary, binary or secondary and tertiary code are meta-constructs of existence as conscious experience. Edited, 2/20/2013.) Focus of attention is our nonphysical to physical interface. An interface is a reciprocating relationship because, the physical is receiving and asserting in the non-physical and vice versa. The action is simultaneous and that's part of why we can observe it but, not hold it. Attention is observation happening and the focus is the observer. The focus is the director and orienter of attention. Our focus is diffuse and multi-domain or else nothing would ever happen.

  • @professormaxtrinity

    @professormaxtrinity

    Жыл бұрын

    Btw, I registered the copyright for the Theory of Reciprocity and it's accompanying math in 2003 Note: the above is the philosophy not the actual theory and it's mathematical basis. That's a whole paper. The above is from the introduction to the Reciprocity dictionary. The dictionary redefines elementary terms within the framework of reciprocity.

  • @sozialeskorrektiv7702
    @sozialeskorrektiv77022 жыл бұрын

    whats the surface area where the information is projected in generell spacetime? 38:10

  • @tamn9446
    @tamn9446 Жыл бұрын

    I’m so excited for what Donald Hoffman is doing.

  • @AndrewNation13
    @AndrewNation132 жыл бұрын

    You ROCK Tim #TYSM brew!! Ect ect

  • @AtypicalPaul
    @AtypicalPaul2 жыл бұрын

    Since our fitness to our perceived reality dictates our success in said reality wouldn't trying to learn about what's under this reality be counterproductive to our survival? Donald has talked about experiments/simulations that he has run and those within the simulation with the least amount of knowledge about what's underneath their reality have the greatest success rate. Therefore by learning about what he's trying to learn could that not be dangerous/ counterproductive/ unwise? If nothing else great balance and cautiousness should be taken while searching. This can be very Destabilizing and could make someone loose touch in physical reality and greatly hurt their fitness. I would love to ask Donald what he thinks about the dangers behind what he's trying to learn and if he has created any way to really balance his life in a way to not loose grip on our simulation we have here.

  • @sebcamm4604
    @sebcamm4604 Жыл бұрын

    Wonderful discussion. I actually came to the idea that I witness the 'source code, beneath the user interface' when I did Ayahuasca, and then googled the idea and found Donald Hoffman. Its truly what I feel and its amazing to me to see its where MUCH brighter minds are looking too! Some of this reminds me of a comment the comedian Duncan Trussel made once - 'the brain is the virtual reality headset the soul puts on' :)

  • @nts9
    @nts92 жыл бұрын

    Donald Hoffman can know what is real because he understands how our brains process information. Our brains create a reality for us based on the limited information we can take in. Hoffman believes that some of the things we perceive as accurate may not be real, but our brains cannot tell the difference.

  • @sanjosemike3137

    @sanjosemike3137

    2 жыл бұрын

    Hoffman's base concept is that "Classical, materialist evolution" decides your consciousness in advance. According to that theory, the only purpose of your existence or consciousness is survival and reproduction. Everything else is meaningless. In Western societies, reproduction is almost halting. How many atheist materialists do you know who are interested in having children? If classical, materialist evolution is debunked in whole or part, then Hoffman's theory will collapse with it. Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)

  • @doctorajwright8437
    @doctorajwright84372 жыл бұрын

    Donald has also had great conversations also with Bernado Kastrup PhD in both computer engineering and philosophy Who is at the forefront of promoting Analytical Idealism….panpsychism a step further …..very similar to Spira as well…there is a video of three of the on you tube. Bernado now heads up the Essentia Foundation promoting a consciousness only ontology…it would be worth having him on your show

  • @geraldfrank1630
    @geraldfrank16302 жыл бұрын

    Seems a very focused man. 🙏

  • @magiclampboogiesdown9717
    @magiclampboogiesdown9717 Жыл бұрын

    Riddle me this: does the unconscious (in the psychological sense) exist independently of our unawareness of it? Serious question. Tell me how that paradox works out in his terms.

  • @SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi
    @SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi20 күн бұрын

    Dr Hoffman you are right take my word for it in the state of pure consciousness their is no self, no causality,no time nor space ,and one is timeless eternal being and once one comes back just before you comes out of very deep dark sphere bounded by a narrow 🌈

  • @SlimTim017
    @SlimTim0172 жыл бұрын

    Some questions I have: Do sperm have a consciousness, or does a fully developed brain turn the existing consciousness interface on? Also, what are your thoughts on the Mandela effect and a simulation theory?

  • @dalton-at-work

    @dalton-at-work

    2 жыл бұрын

    nothing in this universe "has" a conciousness. the universe is a construction OF conciousness. That is what he is saying.

  • @szymborska
    @szymborska2 жыл бұрын

    1:54:50 Sounds very similar to Tibetan Buddhism, and many Tantric traditions in Asia

  • @shawnpalmer6715

    @shawnpalmer6715

    2 жыл бұрын

    oh that is how they do extrodinary things like walking on hot coals

  • @amind1317
    @amind13172 жыл бұрын

    I wonder how much of these principles were considered in the early 80's when they decided to use a two step polytope in the movie Tron, as an interfacing "bit cube".

  • @MADNESS084
    @MADNESS084 Жыл бұрын

    I love an optimistic scientist/ mathematician.

  • @SunnyDayTeaFactory
    @SunnyDayTeaFactory2 жыл бұрын

    Can someone Eli5 please regarding avatars? I'm thinking of schronigers cat. Does everything get rendered? I'm confused but I love it. Someone flesh it out for my smooth brain please.

  • @farhadfaisal9410
    @farhadfaisal94102 жыл бұрын

    In which sense is "true" above is true and, how does one know it to be so? Is it the same as "obvious"?

Келесі