We will get absolutely no support, emotional, financial or practical, for having children. We are just expected to have them so those who want the endless wars have the human resources to do that and then we have to deal with the PTSD etc. It’s just barmy and we figured that out a long time ago.

@virolo4211

10 ай бұрын

They are pissed coz consumers are reducing 😅

@ramsa01Yt

9 ай бұрын

Here is a pill to swallow: men and women dont like each other very much, still men have a biological problem to address daily and women have material problems to address daily. Kids are just a side effect of those daily needs. On the other hand, men are visionary, they think of Rome every day, so when committed, they care for their offsprings, care so much, that they put up with the nonsenses of the marriage -up to a point. Now that feminism through their war on boys and men had ruined males motivation to marry, females are in disabled mode: they dont know what to do. By reaching their 40s, they hit the wall and invest in cats. Nobody have told them not to waste their fertile years. Feminists had lied to them, told "men and children are not important, carrier is important". How a hypergamous female can find a partner, who has a better education and a better job, when both of those were given to her and to other females? Civilization is sick with cancer and this cancer cant be cured by men.

@sweden_is_xxxx

7 ай бұрын

​@@virolo4211 Yes they want workers and consumers. Slaves in other words. Slaves who can make them rich and also serve them doing manual labour. Fk that!

@AdelTheForsaken

5 ай бұрын

Globally they want impoverished destitute people to exploit.

@eirikbelisarius1100

3 ай бұрын

@@sweden_is_xxxx I've seen your comments before. You live in the freest society ever created. Cher the Fk up. The world, outside of Sweden, is a magnificent place. The expectation for you to contribute upholding the society you live in, and is a consumer in, is not unreasonable. If you are sick, or for some reason can't work you'll get benefits to survive on. The only thing enslaving you is your mind!

The big problem with people like this is the great at looking at data and identifying problems and then coming up with solutions which create many more problems. In his mind, Britain just needs to import more africans and Pakistanis to keep the busses running. There is no consideration of how this transforms your society into a much more Balkanized space which will lead to dangerous social instability that results in ahuge decline in quality of life anyway.

@geoffreyharris5931

10 ай бұрын

They don't care about quality of life. They are just concerned about economic indicators, such as taxes, benefits for the old, labor contribution, income etc.

@commentarytalk1446

8 ай бұрын

He's talking BS. Look at the human population spike and the effect on the Earth Capacity. Technology will take over innovation from many people while fewer people with higher quality of life is a superior model living within self-sufficient means. AH's like this probably support a concept of status quo where current Western Hegemony is what the leaders worry about above all.

@sweden_is_xxxx

7 ай бұрын

Yeah, immigration is good for nothing except for making a small part of the population rich while everything else gets destroyed. Japan and South Korea still have a future if they stay ethnically homogeneous, even if they halve their population and have to solve some economical and social issues. In Europe we'll just witness disaster on all levels, including the economy.

@garybarr1045

5 ай бұрын

Depopulation is a MUST for the future of man if man is to survive on a reasonable level. Depop must go on as a priority all around the world, reducing to 1 billion people ideally, and 2 billion people max. We have to exit the contemporary open free-market capitalism scam for an environmentally green plan that enables sustainability in nature. This Western world economy is a scam that must be revised if man and the natural environment are to survive. The talk in this video is bunk by an old economist who either does not see or cannot see what present man is doing in the overall destruction of the natural environment.

@davidsullivan3920

3 ай бұрын

Your comment is clearly racist. He talks about immigration as a short term solution only and doesn't mention 'importing Africans or Pakistanis to run the busses' or presumably any public services - that is in your mind only and reveals your own particular prejudice. Britain is a country of immigrants over many centuries, like the US is over a few centuries. If you consider yourself of Anglo Saxon heritage your ancestors were foreign. or maybe they werer Irish, or maybe Norman, could be Danish (Viking), or yes maybe Indian subcontinent or carribean (or anywhere else the British colonial empire exploited). I hope you understand this. You are of foreign descent. The point being made is that falling birth and fertlity rates now, coupled with falling death rates - due apparently to unplanned childness mainly, alongside better healthcare etc will create serious problems moving forward. A shrinking but aging population means there will be less people of working age to provide a tax base to support that same aging population, - pensions? the NHS? - not to mention less people of working age to do all the socially necessary work - again - especially with an aging population. Technology will fill some of the gap no doubt, but untill the population stabilises (at a much lower level) the coming decades will inevitably engender economic crisis. Immigration isn't any long term solution, because all countries are on the same demographic trajectory, and quite possibly developed countries will soon be fighting for immigrants to keep the ship afloat. The only real upside is that after the climate stabilises in a century's time (maybe) there will be less demand for resources, and zero carbon technologies mean human society might recover and once again flourish. But probably only if capitalismj gives way to socialism and on a world scale - that, or it's dystopia for ever.

The dependency ratio is higher when woman have babies and care for them. A child is two dependents: the child itself and the adult who must supervise/teach him. In the 1970s, women stopped having babies and became taxpayers themselves, resulting in an abnormally low dependency ratio. There was a massive increase in the work force. An ageing population is a case of supporting the elderly instead of children and their mothers.

What is wrong with humans going extinct?

@Nithinithinith

5 ай бұрын

My questions exactly

@robertmoneymaker999

3 ай бұрын

What’s wrong with all species going extinct?

@kaybrown7733

2 ай бұрын

The wealthy would have to give up it's grip on humanity, and they're pissed. I love it! 😂

@eva3414

11 күн бұрын

​@@robertmoneymaker999No. Only human damage the earth. The animals don't.

How about increasing wages that a full-time working father can fully support his family.

WHY IS ECONOMIC GROWTH NECESSARY? No one talks about this.

The "problem" part of this is that there isn't enough population collapse. We're dependent on economic systems that depends on population growth and we simply don't know how to have a functional economy with a declining population, sadly that is the good part. Not to worry, it's a self solving problem, industrialization is a fantastically effective population reducer. The timing couldn't be better, because flood and famine are fantastic migration inducers. In less than a century at least ten percent of the global population is going to move because where they live now is becoming too hot and too wet. Even if we were to magically decide as a species to deal with the damage we are doing, the highest growth populations are currently in those geographic areas worst situated from a climate change perspective. All those folks are going to move to where the population is supposedly collapsing.

@commentarytalk1446

8 ай бұрын

Well described but even so, the carrying capacity of a given area (not over using Earth resources ie self-sufficiency) should be factored into total population of a given area. Population used to be an asset to classical economics. This might change with AI/Robotics where those generate value not people? In fact fewer people, higher quality living of those people using Earth resources within limits seems a far more enlightened outcome than the current demand for population growth as you point out correctly.

@hizacaine

8 ай бұрын

I get the feeling that not a lot of scientific research and quality thought has gone into why populations are dropping. What I'm hearing sounds like conjecture build on supposition wrapped in copium and self explanation supported with a little bit of statistical data that sort of lends credence to whatever bias the author of the day is selling.

@garybarr1045

5 ай бұрын

You are absolutely correct in your analysis. Modern man does not think rationally when it comes to overpopulation and diminishing resources. He is totally ignoring planet Earth and the natural environment. He is making his own bed to lie in. The Earth is starting to fight back through Earth warming and associated factors. There will be much destruction of the natural environment caused by man but man will pay the ultimate price if he does not start to change his ways quickly. I will bet no money on man pulling out of his overpopulation dilemma successfully.

I love how these people in suits sit here and go over the data but won't talk about solutions at a ground level. Probably so as to not sound pessimistic but look around, it's a negative world we live in.

@Rowlph8888

10 ай бұрын

Not true.That's Relative. What times BEFORE this, do you consider with rose coloured glasses? The baby boomers are often thought of as the luckiest generation in the history of the planet, because of social mobility opportunity and personal Ownership rights being lucrative, but they had Far fewer services and of much less quality, which we takeFor granted now in 1st world countries. I would say that the only time that has been better than the currrent time, was between 1995 and 2008, everything slowly got worse since then, but comparably, but in different ways to pre-1995..Any time before 1965, anywherIn the world for the entire history of the world, life was much worse than it is now

@geoffreyharris5931

10 ай бұрын

@@Rowlph8888 The best years for me were 1975 and 1976. We were living in Sacramento and my dad was a university professor there.

@sweden_is_xxxx

7 ай бұрын

​@@Rowlph8888 If you're only into material wealth then yeah sure the last few decades have probably been the best ever in human history. But how many young people committed suicide 100 or 200 years ago, or young women suffering from anorexia etc? Life was different yes, but when was it better or worse in terms of happiness, security, mental health, purpose of life etc?

There is no labor shortage and if nations US/UK send a lot of immigrants home, the unemployed will pick up the slack . Might even have a few kids if they figure t there will be jobs in the future not taken up by some foreigner. Immigration is a short term solution (some labor now) with horrible long term consequences (middling UK city is now demographically Kampur or Kinshsa)

@doomie21

10 ай бұрын

Ook in de US?UK hebben ze genoeg mensen die de tekorten kunnen aanvullen. Het probleem is vaak dat werkgevers de wil niet hebben om te investeren in opleiding- en ervaringstrajecten.

@simonacerton3478

10 ай бұрын

​@@doomie21Bedankt God voor Google Translate. Mijn Nederlandse taalvaardigheid is zeer beperkt. Ja, je hebt op alle punten volkomen gelijk.

@sahulianhooligan7046

9 ай бұрын

This would have happened in Japan if that was the case

He took note that religiosity so often leads to healthy fertility yet is not curious why or if it could teach us. Like, what is it about the lifestyles or mentality of religious people that prompts them to have children? Another demographer has a video up here I think it’s called “the religious shall inherit the Earth“ which explores this a bit more, in fact according to his research he believes that the world is going to get more religious even in the developed world. Due to religious people having higher fertility rates And immigrants coming in 10 to have higher levels of religiosity, who then go on to have children.

@hannanatalisa3282

10 ай бұрын

Why The Religious Shall Inherit The Earth -- Eric Kaufmann kzread.info/dash/bejne/e41529hukcKZfLA.html

@olindblo

9 ай бұрын

Just make sure not to mistake correlation for causation. It might be that the same people who tend to have children tend towards religiosity, not that religiosity leads to having children. Once you ask what being religious and having children have in common, rather than how one leads to the other, it might turn out that it’s just people who are more susceptible to external social pressure.

@59Gretsch

9 ай бұрын

@@olindblo No, social pressure is against having more than one or two kids max. So high fertility women in the West are certainly BUCKING social pressure, not caving. Doing the correlation-Causation thing is often away to dodge the obvious. And in this case it is that everywhere you look in the world you see this pattern of religious people having more kids, even when all the other differences are factored in. This is true in China (mostly athiest) Russia, Israel, USA, Italy. The fertility of Atheists are so low, we should consider what the long term effects of "heritable traits" in decline in humans, if this will be good or bad. For another example, we know Intelligence is partly heritable. If the most intelligent persons are NOT passing on their genes at the rate that the least intelligent people are, what would be the effect 5-10-20 generations out? Humans have never had the ease of controlling fertility as we now have with ease. When the vapors of Christianity are gone, people will look at this very difficult subject in ways we cant now (and for legit reasons)

Yes, supporting a large elderly population with very little young people will cause a lot of problems in the short term. Although, in the long-term a smaller population will be much better for humanity. With less people there will be less competition for jobs, less competition for housing, higher wages,more equality, less competition for resources, better cohesion, less pollution among other benefits. Mass immigration/over population in the west is what’s causing the majority of the issues today. If we just let the population collapse run it’s course without artificially propping it up with mass immigration things will get much better in the long run.

@pkom6418

Ай бұрын

Who will treat you when you get sick? 😂

@MeMe-zq7qd

29 күн бұрын

I actually have 4 kids myself..

Mouth Piece for the UN Migration Global Population Strategy while F-over the native population: Less people in the UK would eventually resolve housing problems, more space for everyone, labour shortage would drive up wages (eventually), easier to hit those sustainabilty targets eg lower CO2, more food security, more land can be put back to nature eg forests... Yet here we are with this AH demaning more population via more migration (that's what it will lead to). Many people are doing BS jobs are are unproductive. Technology will take up the slack there. GDP is a bs measure... Break up central government and people will thrive just fine with a contracting population as people find solutions on the ground and the top-down policy hell-hole of these elite planners is removed.

Reasons I didn’t have kids: •I never met a man I wanted to make a father •I don’t enjoy being around children and never felt maternal •I don’t make much money •I have a personal and family history of severe depression and agoraphobia •I like my freedom •I like my body the way it is •You can’t raise kids how you want without interference from the state •Social media has increased narcissistic traits and greatly reduced interpersonal skills and made everyone lonelier •I hate being forced to use technology but never getting to speak to an actual person •Covid revealed how authoritarian and thick governments really are and I’m not interested in sentencing another life to the Machine to be an endlessly monitored number that can’t speak freely. •You can’t do what you want with your own land and be left alone. •Men can leave you to be a single mum at any time Just a few 😁, I will look after my parents and serve my community in other ways and eventually leave whatever I have to people I value and/or who need it. Happy I’ve had this choice.

@LadyMarigoldWithers

8 ай бұрын

@@nicholasphelps3872​​⁠I’ll talk to anyone as I’m fairly social but not interested in a relationship currently.

@riverblack123

6 ай бұрын

Thank God you're not having child. We need good genes passed foward only.

@robertbrandywine

2 ай бұрын

Yeah, but other than that what?

@eva3414

11 күн бұрын

You can live your life as you want. We are free. You're a good person. A person that helps everyone with taxes and caring your parents. 100 per cent.

This needs to be scaled with increasing life spans. I do agree although and care to listen 😮

@taliaeve969

2 ай бұрын

sure we have a longer life but I know no 75-year-old that can do the manual labor or keep up with me with the computer.

Tell this to the folks in Haiti, Bangladesh and Gaza

@chriswatson1698

2 ай бұрын

Bangladesh has reduced its fertility to replacement level. The women asked for contraception and were given it.

Population collaboration is not an issue for people, it is an issue for the Government

@eva3414

11 күн бұрын

That's it! The rich are in fear losing slaves.

He is SO handsome!

Population decline is a symptom of using fiat currency

@geoffreyharris5931

10 ай бұрын

Nonsense.

@yourname06

5 ай бұрын

@c.guibbs1238 USD use to be backed by gold. 1971 Nixon took us off the gold standard making it useless

@blafonovision4342

4 ай бұрын

Lol

@blafonovision4342

3 ай бұрын

@@derek4412 facts.

Lol at this misanthropic comment section. Utilizing technological advancements, we can still support a growing human population. In fact, researchers have found that with population growth, resources have traditionally become more abundant, especially within the context of how long it takes to work to attain something (time prices). It’s a phenomenon called “superabundance” coined by Cato Institute senior researcher Marian Tupy. Today, we can yield greater harvests from smaller plots of land and with less water due to drought-resistant GMOs, etc. We have to plan well, but the planet can still sustain billions of more people. A collapsing population is absolutely a problem, even with AI and robots in the workforce. A robot doesn’t pay taxes. A robot can’t support retirement pensions. Robots can’t fully take care of the needs of an elderly population. Having children will allow you, me, our children to be able to not toil the rest of our lives…

@donz0621

5 күн бұрын

Unborn children will never toil a day in their lives. The previous generations should solve their own pension problems and not pass it to the next generation. It's bad enough that the future generation will inherit trillions of national debt the old gen corrupted and mishandled.

Malthus and Erhlich were right. Their warnings were heeded and the evils that they warned about were avoided.

Certainly our resources have been misappropriated and devalued. In addition, some of our requirements for survival disappear due to our activities (processing and ruining our food, and polluting the sky, crops, water, everything). And now our planetary resources are diminishing at the same time that we are experiencing the Sixth Mass Extinction. One thing to remember is that war, and engineering our environment are financially lucrative.

Don’t agree, if there was ever a time where we need less people on the planet this is it. With climate change we will have fewer places to live , more migration, more civil unrest, more issues with pandemics and to top it off, more jobs eliminated due to AI. So ….. we have already overpopulated the planet, time to swing in the opposite direction. I feel compassion for the people in third world countries in the tropics and along the equator, can’t imagine how they will grow food or keep their animals alive. We need to come up with a global plan for immigration, unless the world is totally okay with millions dying or living in poverty. It’s an ugly situation but the sooner we face it the better. I’m still hoping that there are enough of us willing to make the sacrifice for the long term solutions.

@billoloo2870

9 ай бұрын

Exactly. Infact, you spoke to my mind

@chriswatson1698

8 ай бұрын

The most inhumane people in the world are the men who start babies when they are unable to provide an acceptable living standard to the children that they already have. Those of us that have reproduced responsibly must protect ourselves from the evil over-reproducers.

Simple economics. Instead of (metaphorically) patting women on the head and saying "it's worth it', actually pay them what it's worth. Essentially, being a woman raising children is modern day slavery, and they are saying it is NOT worth it. Supply and demand.

@grannyannie2948

11 ай бұрын

And for that situation feminists are largely to blame. My mother was a 60s 70s feminists. But feminists threw mothers under the bus. At first they claimed to wanted to empower mothers and housewives, but as soon as they empowered themselves they turned on stay at home mothers and abused and ridiculed them. I don't live in the UK, I came for Moorland, but many British working class women in their 50s describe the same.

@user-cw9kc1ls7w

11 ай бұрын

I think not paying primary caregivers for raising kids (largely women) by governments (largely men) has more to do with enslavement than name-calling by anyone, but it honestly doesn't matter who or how they got there. Women are throwing off the chains of slavery by not having children, and by and large it is the men who are whinging, not the women. Until having children is paid what it is worth, NEITHER men nor women will want to stay at home and raise the next generation and we'll stay below replacement. The economy is s***wed anyway. Mathematically, you cannot have infinite growth, and the population will decline at some point anyway, whether now or in 100 years. What the question is, is how a decline should be managed.

@kjkj4725

11 ай бұрын

@@grannyannie2948BS. I am making 60k € per year. Will someone pay me 60k yearly so I can support myself and a child? No? Then it’s not worth it. Simple capitalism - having children is unpaid labor… But let’s think about it: How much does the baby cost on the free market? Surrogate? 100k€? Care for a baby full time? 50k€? Food, supplies etc? WHY WOULD ANYONE DO ALL OF THIS FOR FREE? LOL.

@user-od5fh3gn4d

11 ай бұрын

@@grannyannie2948no. Men have already chosen the internet stimulation over women: they are developing robots and artificial wombs to replace women as we speak. Men will toss us out for tech and most women, even if they won’t say it out loud; know this will happen regardless of what we do or don’t do.

@thelourensfamily8048

10 ай бұрын

​@@kjkj4725You're throwing emotion and sentiment out entirely. That says a lot about your individualistic nature and perhaps that is more the reason than capitalism.

The meek shall inherit the earth. Mother Nature!

IDK about Africa. Their geography is bad, causing a capital shortage. Their tribalism/politics/borders are bad, causing ongoing wars and economic decline. Their development and location is bad, causing isolation during deglobilization, causing starvation. They still have Ebola, among other diseases, that can surprise them if they come to feel secure about their children surviving.

@baassiia

9 ай бұрын

No birth control. Women in Afrika don't have choice if they want another kid or not, it just happen.

@yemaweh

6 ай бұрын

Been and watched Africa for 20 years, and it has been growing as one of the fastest region. U will be shocked where they will be in a few decades

@pkom6418

Ай бұрын

Excuse me, I live in Ghana. Trust me, my country is probably more peaceful than yours 😂.

israel is dropping.

We confuse education with indoctrination. Don’t you think that if we were more “educated “ with regards to the importance of demographics our societies would have made different choices?

@olindblo

9 ай бұрын

Education makes you more consistent at making choices that benefit you. While having children benefits society, it does not necessarily benefit you. That’s why there’s an argument for society having to step up to cover the cost of having children, instead of the individual who is having the children. Right now, those costs are not yet being covered for, and until it happens, there will be no incentive to have children. Oh, so what happens if society can’t afford to cover the costs? Gee sounds a lot like the most prosperous time in human history hasn’t done a very good job of spreading that prosperity around. I wonder if there’s a critique of global capitalism buried somewhere in there?

@olindblo

9 ай бұрын

Alternatively, you can just take the education away so that people go back to making the bourgeoisie happy without complaining. With education comes the ability to see how fucked things are.

Thanks for the episode. 👍🏻 for Paul Morland.

@Athegnosticish

11 ай бұрын

I'm glad I listened and pass what I said onto Mr. Morland, that's how people can most readily be convinced by factoring in time...or to illustrate there's no real problem but it cannot be known

@julianskinner3697

7 ай бұрын

He thinks feminists and lefties are problems?

The absolute last thing we should do is increase the population any further. Resources are dwindling and that will include food and electricity production in the near future.

@grannyannie2948

11 ай бұрын

Malthusian nonsense. The only thing that is reducing resources is the climate death cult and their ridiculous religious demands. How many children and grandchildren do you have? If you are fifty or younger these are the only people who will look after you when you are old. Physically or financially. Population only increases in the west due to mass immigration. Do you really think they will devote their life and taxes to your well-being in old age?

Growth Growth Growth, always chasing imaginary growth. Why not stability for once, oh right, growth...

@grannyannie2948

11 ай бұрын

He is not chasing growth but stability in favour of contraction and societal collapse. I'm Australian, and came to listen to Moorland, but I believe our country's are similar in the following regard. Our birthrates have been at or slightly below replacement since about the middle 1950s. All growth beyond that point has been achieved by government policies of mass immigration. Our last census shows that half the people living in our country are immigrants who arrived fairly recently. This artificially increases the cost of housing. It also breaks down social cohesion atomising community strength and safety. And both of these things prevent people having children. Nobody wants to raise a family in a single room in a share house in a high crime neighbourhood.

@HermitGeek

11 ай бұрын

@@grannyannie2948 Why not accept the population collapse then? Less people means less stress on everything from infrastucture to healthcare, robots and automation can take the factory and a lot of other manual jobs, which they are already doing so why need more immigrants? It is not really a problem unless you're a richie wanting profits to rise every year due to cheap labour...

@grannyannie2948

11 ай бұрын

@@HermitGeek I agree completely. Politicians think in three year terms and growth due to immigration, to raise GDP to borrow ever more money for infrastructure and services. So it's a Ponzi scheme.

@simonacerton3478

11 ай бұрын

@@grannyannie2948 Even immigrants, The US has been below since 1972 and similar conditions mean within 1 generation immigrants stop having kids . It less ridiculous in the US as our population density is pretty low 1/9th that of the UK and do to coastal concentration much less than in Australia too but its still an issue.

@grannyannie2948

11 ай бұрын

@@simonacerton3478 I agree. Though to be fair when comparing Australia to the USA, our population is much smaller than the US. But that's why I call it a Ponzi scheme. Post war immigrants actually got a higher standard of living. Today they come to drive Uber and sleep four to a room. But it has deeper applications. Our last census shows that half the people voting in the country are recent immigrants. So are we still a democracy? We currently have a major housing crisis with even working families with children facing homelessness. The government solution, bring in a million migrants as soon as possible. This will make it even harder for young people to form families. They don't care. They have a million more voters to manipulate. It doesn't matter who you vote for its been the same outcome for decades. It's planned replacement.

Good. There are too many people in the world by perhaps a factor of 100.

i dont see this as a problem.

We need protection of all humans life from moment of conception.

@blafonovision4342

9 ай бұрын

Why the moment of conception? Isn’t that rather arbitrary?

@julianskinner3697

7 ай бұрын

No we don't

There is no underpopulation problem. Overpopulation problem always exists

@sahulianhooligan7046

9 ай бұрын

Seems to be solving itself

People are just more selfish; especially modern woman. Children require sacrifices of ones time and life and that is hard for self serving people to do.

@user-od5fh3gn4d

11 ай бұрын

Men prefer tech over women, and will throw us aside for robots and artificial wombs when they arrive. We have no reason to breed for men who already prefer their screens.

@Recuper8

10 ай бұрын

Boomers really are the worst generation in human history.

@whitneyanders5945

9 ай бұрын

Yes, because nothing says selfless like being a brood mare pumping out more kids then can be properly fed, clothed, educated, loved and housed. I suppose your ideal female is a fundamentalist religious type or those women in Africa who have so many kids that they suffer from malnutrition and early death.

@baassiia

9 ай бұрын

​@@whitneyanders5945people that make such comments as @geebee almost always doesn't have any kids ;) raising kids is hard and everybody who has one knows it

@chriswatson1698

8 ай бұрын

@@baassiia The needs of children are unpredictable and often inconvenient. When the mother cares for the children, or asks her employer for time off to take care of their needs, she is investing in the earning power of the child's father at the expense of her own. And he is entitled to discard her and take his career with him to share with a woman who has done nothing but invest in her own earning power. When women are forced into single parenthood, that means poverty and/or a very stressful existence, juggling paid employment with child care. A woman who gains custody of her children continues to subsidize her ex's career by relieving him of the inconvenience of the needs of his own children.

Unleds inflation is fixed and women rights removed it wont be fixed. But humanity could be goimg back to the pre 7 billion days of less humans.

@user-od5fh3gn4d

11 ай бұрын

We women will un alive ourselves like those in Afghanistan. Tech moguls want you to scapegoat women for all society’s ills while they scheme to usher in tech-dictatorship.

@RK-ve4xp

8 ай бұрын

Yes. But it will never be fixed.

@user-od5fh3gn4d

8 ай бұрын

@@RK-ve4xp men don’t want women, anyway. They’d rather have rubber dolls and robots. They already prefer digital stimulation over real women.