Plane Descends Too Low

Ғылым және технология

Enjoy this episode of 3 Minutes of Aviation!
✈ SOURCES / FURTHER INFORMATION
Boeing 777 approaching below glide path in Phuket, Thailand
• PHUKET beach LOW and L...
Lancair LX7 runway overrun on landing
• LX7 Lancair Aircraft a...
SWISS Boeing 777 encountering 50 knots crosswind
• SWISS B777 crosswind o...
LOT Boeing 787 Dreamliner autopilot fighting turbulence
• Boeing 787 Dreamliner ...
Avianca Airbus A319 cockpit view takeoff in Rio de Janeiro
• Decolagem Santos Dumon...
✈ BECOME PART OF THE CHANNEL
Merch Store - teespring.com/stores/3-minute...
✈ CONTACT ME
Submit videos, give feedback, ask questions - 3minutesofaviation@gmail.com
If you liked the video, please subscribe and turn on notifications - I appreciate it!

Пікірлер: 353

  • @Youtub77W
    @Youtub77W28 күн бұрын

    Everybody on the beach: "Wow a 777" In the cockpit: "Too low terrain…20…terrain Terrain PULL UP…10…"

  • @eisbeinGermany

    @eisbeinGermany

    28 күн бұрын

  • @hilman94

    @hilman94

    27 күн бұрын

    i love how russian pilot always consistent with "we pay for the whole runway, then we'll use the whole runway" principle 😁

  • @crossfield.

    @crossfield.

    27 күн бұрын

    The callouts dont work like that.

  • @u2bear377

    @u2bear377

    27 күн бұрын

    Too low, fence!

  • @tomb1345

    @tomb1345

    26 күн бұрын

    The terrain alarm doesn’t sound within the approach minimums

  • @pilroberts6185
    @pilroberts618528 күн бұрын

    To be fair, there's a bit of an optical illusion (parallax view) effect on that first 777. The camera was further away and there was a small bluff in front of the camera. The 777 was higher above the threshold than the slight rise directly in front of the camera.

  • @koleknight

    @koleknight

    28 күн бұрын

    Yes, and it was not filmed from the same place at all.

  • @tonamg53

    @tonamg53

    27 күн бұрын

    While you’re correct, the plane is still coming in way too low than usual. You’re supposed to be at 50 ft above the runway threshold when landing…. I’ll give that 20 ft above max.

  • @petesmith1924

    @petesmith1924

    27 күн бұрын

    It was too low, whatever you think about parallax.

  • @Geofs_339

    @Geofs_339

    26 күн бұрын

    And I think that the pilots approached deliberately that low, maybe for some planespotters.

  • @shireenbegum9166

    @shireenbegum9166

    22 күн бұрын

    This beach needs to be turned into maho like in st.masrten, there needs to be a fence and a bar at the corner

  • @Erik_Jorgensen
    @Erik_Jorgensen28 күн бұрын

    1:04 "Hi car insurance, I'd like to file a claim." "What happened?" "I hit an airplane" "Can you repeat that, please."

  • @BillHinnoude

    @BillHinnoude

    28 күн бұрын

    🤣🤣

  • @starpawsy

    @starpawsy

    27 күн бұрын

    ACtually, it was "an airplane hit ME"

  • @PearlCityBeats

    @PearlCityBeats

    26 күн бұрын

    followed by the claim being denied because I'm sure the insurance company wouldn't cover it.

  • @paulis7319

    @paulis7319

    26 күн бұрын

    Police report: You're at fault for driving past the end of the runway. Insurance company: Denies claim and drops coverage

  • @hollylovesgiraffes

    @hollylovesgiraffes

    21 күн бұрын

    😂😂😂😂

  • @almightytitan2354
    @almightytitan235428 күн бұрын

    "Coming in low is just something you have do when you're landing." -- Ted Striker

  • @tonyf9076

    @tonyf9076

    27 күн бұрын

    Surely you cannot be serious ?

  • @rixxy9204

    @rixxy9204

    27 күн бұрын

    Don't call me Shirly. I picked the wrong week to quit horse tranquilizers!

  • @tonyf9076

    @tonyf9076

    27 күн бұрын

    @@rixxy9204 shall we get you to a hospital? Why what is it ? Well it's a big building with doctors and patients in, but that's not important now....

  • @tedstrikertwa800

    @tedstrikertwa800

    27 күн бұрын

    You know it

  • @Mom-USMCRichardUSMCChristopher

    @Mom-USMCRichardUSMCChristopher

    27 күн бұрын

    🥀🇺🇸🥀 I read your comment and couldn’t stop laughing! Great sense of humor!

  • @DrHarryT
    @DrHarryT28 күн бұрын

    I suspect the Lancair was fast on approach too, after the bounce or even before should have done a go-around.

  • @lbowsk

    @lbowsk

    28 күн бұрын

    Hell of a way to ruin a perfectly good airplane. He appeared to be absolutely hauling ass and had plenty of energy to GA and try it again.

  • @iMin00

    @iMin00

    26 күн бұрын

    @@lbowskhe did not. The power lever broke. That’s also why he was too fast.

  • @celderian

    @celderian

    25 күн бұрын

    @@iMin00 Then why not put the prop in beta range as soon as he hit the ground?

  • @vip3rnb762
    @vip3rnb76228 күн бұрын

    It was only 10knots of cross by touchdown, wind is always stronger higher up.

  • @petesmith1924

    @petesmith1924

    27 күн бұрын

    Indeed. I paused the video and zoomed in. 10kts across at 50ft, zero wind at touchdown. Not exactly challenging!

  • @stuka101

    @stuka101

    24 күн бұрын

    yep - this channel sometimes has the dumbest quotes.

  • @tiemji
    @tiemji28 күн бұрын

    The Santos Dumont departure is very nice

  • @Leonardokite
    @Leonardokite28 күн бұрын

    That Lancair was sickening..... such a beautiful slick airplane. 😪

  • @SirKober

    @SirKober

    28 күн бұрын

    Wondering why no go around...

  • @Leonardokite

    @Leonardokite

    28 күн бұрын

    @@SirKober I'll bet the pilot is still saying the same thing.

  • @TC-bz9dz

    @TC-bz9dz

    25 күн бұрын

    the power lever broke

  • @xs10z

    @xs10z

    3 күн бұрын

    @@TC-bz9dz no joke... sounds reasonable, actually

  • @johngraves6878
    @johngraves687828 күн бұрын

    My favorite is the Rio takeoff. I took off from that airport a couple times. That's not even Rio's main airport, but it is the most scenic.

  • @vieuxbal1253

    @vieuxbal1253

    27 күн бұрын

    Amazing indeed. Have you experienced a take-off at New York La Guardia? This is something, too.

  • @myfavorites9686

    @myfavorites9686

    7 күн бұрын

    I was in a hotel in Santa Teresa Rio de Janeiro , sitting at the veranda , overlooking the Pão de Açucar mountain and the runaway of Santos Dumont . Nice to see the opposite way 👍

  • @fluchterschoen
    @fluchterschoen28 күн бұрын

    I bet a lot of people on that first plane were yelling "Phuket".

  • @hessranch

    @hessranch

    28 күн бұрын

    😂😂😂😂

  • @Sklounst_Actual

    @Sklounst_Actual

    28 күн бұрын

    That doesn't really make any sense

  • @Emmettb08

    @Emmettb08

    28 күн бұрын

    @@Sklounst_Actualyes it does

  • @Sklounst_Actual

    @Sklounst_Actual

    28 күн бұрын

    @@Emmettb08 Nah

  • @767_Aviation

    @767_Aviation

    28 күн бұрын

    @@Sklounst_Actualit’s probably a bad word in Russian

  • @Matticitt
    @Matticitt27 күн бұрын

    Extra 4 seconds of aviation today

  • @patricknerl1375
    @patricknerl137527 күн бұрын

    How do you come up with 50 knots crosswind in the Swiss Clip? At the beginning you can see a wind of not more than 45 knots on the NAV display which equals a crosswind component of around 43 - 44 knots. And later on as they get closer to the runway the wind calms down to just round about 10 knots. And if you take into consideration, that the wind is coming from the front right, you get a crosswind component of round about 8 - 9 knots when overflying the runway treshhold. Not any second was there a crosswind of 50 knots during the whole clip

  • @fluchterschoen
    @fluchterschoen28 күн бұрын

    Can someone in the know suggest what went wrong with the Lancair LX7? I can see from the caption that it lost a bit of runway due to the bounce - but apart from that it seemed to come in faster than expected for a light aircraft, and then didn't seem to slow down very much at all. Based on the engine note - the rpm didn't seem to change much - am I correct in thinking the pilot didn't cut the engine? I'm interested to hear an expert take please! Also, that seemed like a go-around would have easily saved the day (and a million dollar airplane), correct?

  • @kevelliott

    @kevelliott

    28 күн бұрын

    It looked like a downwind landing (I haven't checked if a windsock was visible) as the aircraft lost NO speed at all - and you're right, a go-around would have been the best choice.

  • @Cantthinkofahandle117

    @Cantthinkofahandle117

    28 күн бұрын

    I've seen that clip before. If I remember right, he came in to fast and should have just gone around. I think that was not his first attempt and he got frustrated and didn't want to go around again so he said f' it. Problem with standing on the brakes like that, when he locked up the wheels he lost most of his braking ability.

  • @johnmorris7815

    @johnmorris7815

    28 күн бұрын

    As I understand it he couldn’t get the prop into beta range which means he had thrust on throughout the rollout, should’ve gone around.

  • @fluchterschoen

    @fluchterschoen

    28 күн бұрын

    @@johnmorris7815 Ah. So it was correct that the engine revs didn't seem to drop, but the propeller pitch stayed in thrust instead of going into neutral or reverse? I guess maybe in that situation, once the pilot had selected the beta range, even though it wasn't happening it might have caused a decision-making conflict around whether to continue with the landing or to go around. If the prop-pitch actuators were malfunctioning there would be concern that neutral or reverse thrust could kick in at any moment (and after pulling the nose up, sudden loss of thrust could be catastrophic).

  • @MeppyMan

    @MeppyMan

    27 күн бұрын

    The knob fell off. No joke that’s the pilot’s excuse.

  • @landingslowly
    @landingslowly28 күн бұрын

    Nice to see the comparison between those approaches! Really shows how low the Aeroflot was!

  • @JohnyG29

    @JohnyG29

    28 күн бұрын

    No, the camera wasn't at the same angle.

  • @ChuckieFinzter

    @ChuckieFinzter

    28 күн бұрын

    It looked like the video was taken from a lower position. ​@JohnyG29

  • @3MinutesofAviation

    @3MinutesofAviation

    27 күн бұрын

    Glad you liked it!

  • @petesmith1924

    @petesmith1924

    27 күн бұрын

    It is irrelevant what camera angle each was taken from. The first aeroplane was WAY below 50ft crossing the landing threshold. That makes it dangerously unstable, which should have lead to a go around.

  • @galxieranger8277
    @galxieranger827727 күн бұрын

    "Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for flying with us today. I hope you have a pleasant day, welcome to Phuket." "Captain, that's not how it's pronounced. Though I do now understand that landing you just did."

  • @dimitrimendrinos2049
    @dimitrimendrinos204927 күн бұрын

    Swiss B777 wind on landing was only 8 knots from the 2o'clock position. So total crosswind component probably 4 knots.

  • @damienmayne7205
    @damienmayne72052 күн бұрын

    The autopilot wing movement, stabilising the plane...it was like watching an armoured cyborg albatross wing... Perfection. Mankind has mimicked and recreated the best of supernature.

  • @christian-jakobgrasl
    @christian-jakobgrasl28 күн бұрын

    the Aeroflot T73/ER is every plane spotters dream :-) !! can`t get too low enough :-)

  • @renevile
    @renevile28 күн бұрын

    1:51 i like this sentence structure, where you start with the "importent" part wich is what to look for in the clip, and then after that you give the aircraft data and follow up info. It's especially nice for us non-native english speakers that read a lot slower and some times have trouble reading all the text before it goes away.

  • @BK-qp8zp

    @BK-qp8zp

    28 күн бұрын

    You can slow down the playback speed in the settings. I find it quite helpful.

  • @TheTishbite
    @TheTishbite24 күн бұрын

    Your videos are the only ones I can hit a thumbs up BEFORE I view it LOL

  • @rexhinlo3398
    @rexhinlo339827 күн бұрын

    Nah. That "nominal landing" was taken at a different angle at a different spot and that made it look higher than the other landing.

  • @user-jl3ex4ik1t
    @user-jl3ex4ik1t28 күн бұрын

    Awesome episode!

  • @tusharsinha94
    @tusharsinha9425 күн бұрын

    I was there at Phuket yesterday! Unfortunately they were taking off towards the ocean, but I landed from this side and the weather was stormy. Quite a landing!

  • @jeffreydeeds9225
    @jeffreydeeds922527 күн бұрын

    I like flying in and out rof Rio's Santos Dumont airport. You get an excellent view of the city and the magnificent scenery.

  • @Farbrorsallad
    @Farbrorsallad27 күн бұрын

    Love your garden! Nice job!

  • @Miss_StephMarie94
    @Miss_StephMarie944 күн бұрын

    Your channel inspired me to start mine! Great work and great content ❤

  • @HELSINKIspotting
    @HELSINKIspotting28 күн бұрын

    Awesome 👌 Greetings from Helsinki

  • @3MinutesofAviation

    @3MinutesofAviation

    27 күн бұрын

    Thank you! Cheers!

  • @cut--
    @cut--27 күн бұрын

    Some of those remind me of my first few weeks of MSFS.

  • @dnhug
    @dnhug27 күн бұрын

    Thank you for the credits! Anytime again! Cheers,Dominic

  • @3MinutesofAviation

    @3MinutesofAviation

    27 күн бұрын

    Thanks for the cool videos you have, keep them coming 😍

  • @WingWarnings
    @WingWarnings27 күн бұрын

    great capturing.

  • @spookyaction8917
    @spookyaction891728 күн бұрын

    Thanks!

  • @tamezjaime1
    @tamezjaime127 күн бұрын

    The Swiss 777 landed with 10 kts cross wind you can see on the ND. Above 1000ft was 40 kts.

  • @josetaveira7094
    @josetaveira709424 күн бұрын

    Best 3m I’ve ever seen and I’ve seen almost all of them

  • @flyingmyles
    @flyingmyles28 күн бұрын

    Wonderful videos as always! The runway excursion one... was that bloke playing golf next to the runway😅?

  • @chrispop99

    @chrispop99

    28 күн бұрын

    Gardening, I thought. He was more chilled than I would have been!

  • @flyingmyles

    @flyingmyles

    28 күн бұрын

    @chrispop99 yes that would be a very big golf club looking at it now

  • @FunYl

    @FunYl

    26 күн бұрын

    Right, airfields are perfect for it

  • @flyingmyles

    @flyingmyles

    26 күн бұрын

    @@FunYl Google golf course at Bangkok Airport, its as close as this video!

  • @miked9958

    @miked9958

    15 күн бұрын

    looks like a weed whacker

  • @augustinep6193
    @augustinep619328 күн бұрын

    Good. Thanks.

  • @mrkiplingreallywasanexceed8311
    @mrkiplingreallywasanexceed83116 күн бұрын

    Soooo much good stuff as always !! Maaaan that first one was low and oops that was quite a prang after falling off the end of the runway😂

  • @ryanfrisby7389
    @ryanfrisby738927 күн бұрын

    Great video!

  • @airbus12345
    @airbus1234528 күн бұрын

    Nice video!

  • @aris1956
    @aris19567 күн бұрын

    Deve essere un vero spettacolo per la gente su quella spiaggia ogni volta che arriva un aereo.

  • @Deionburns114
    @Deionburns11428 күн бұрын

    Nice video

  • @arnesw2647
    @arnesw264728 күн бұрын

    Very cool! 😁👍

  • @friendofenkidu3391
    @friendofenkidu339128 күн бұрын

    0:36: The Lancair LX7 crash occurred on 11 November 2023 at Aero Country Airport (T31) in McKinney, Texas. According to news reports, the motorist sustained minor injuries but the pilot and passenger in the LX7 were not injured. The NTSB preliminary report for accident number CEN24LA037 is worth reading.

  • @ifly135

    @ifly135

    27 күн бұрын

    Door seal fail, throttle knob unscrewed and came off, failed to go beta. Maintenance issues will get you, but there is no way that the pilot shouldn't have noticed the knob was loose. Bounced, then applied brakes half way down the runway. Pilot error, anyone?

  • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183

    @rtbrtb_dutchy4183

    27 күн бұрын

    @@ifly135yup. Touched down too fast.

  • @Ex-AshMain
    @Ex-AshMain27 күн бұрын

    The Aeroflot 777 wasn’t even that low, it is the perspective. The first clip is filmed from higher compared to the second clip which is almost at sea level and also different angle.

  • @mostlydollshelicopters4799
    @mostlydollshelicopters479928 күн бұрын

    Super 👋😃✈️

  • @willcall9431
    @willcall943128 күн бұрын

    The first two were taken from different vantage points and were about the same hight.

  • @A7-BBI
    @A7-BBI11 күн бұрын

    Don’t listen to the hate comments. Your videos are perfect

  • @betsymoore8057
    @betsymoore805725 күн бұрын

    Pilots are awesome…. Most of them! ❤

  • @Theiliteritesbian
    @Theiliteritesbian21 күн бұрын

    Pilots are so cool

  • @Stefan_Boerjesson
    @Stefan_Boerjesson28 күн бұрын

    Time 01:13 and on. Where is the sidewind? The land with the node straight forward as it looks.

  • @paulc180
    @paulc1804 күн бұрын

    I did my UK PPL and I recall when training I did a landing in a small Piper tomahawk in Cardiff Main airport Wales UK and the cross wind weas so strong i actually lined up the runway through the passenger window until the last 200 ft, scary

  • @williambyrnes4198
    @williambyrnes419827 күн бұрын

    Love the 1st video trying to show the difference in approach from two different angles. To me I think they were both the same.

  • @informationalpha1
    @informationalpha128 күн бұрын

    nice!

  • @chriswestring1974
    @chriswestring197426 күн бұрын

    That didn’t look like a crosswind landing at all. At 50 knots of crosswind, the runway wouldn’t be at 12 o’clock. It would be visible out the side window.

  • @BariumCobaltNitrog3n
    @BariumCobaltNitrog3n28 күн бұрын

    "Plane descends too low" to land. That would be underground. A 50 knot crosswind with the nose pointing straight down the runway. Amazing. No yaw. That flaperon was working really hard. So much work. And here's a plane taking off, filmed by the -hijacker- flight engineer.

  • @tomlee7956

    @tomlee7956

    28 күн бұрын

    There was NO 50 knot crosswind. If you check the instruments, the wind was from about 40 degrees to the right of the nose, 194 degrees at 11 knots, which means, there was virtually no crosswind, in other words, it was a piece of cake. At 50 knots direct crosswind, you see the runway off your side window and not directly in front of you.

  • @theozonloch

    @theozonloch

    28 күн бұрын

    Well, the crosswind on approach was ~45kt but during the landing itselft it was 10kt at most, so the title is kinda misleading and that's why there is almost no yaw. Crosswind limit on the B777 is 38kt so you'll never see an actual landing with 50kt crossind ;)

  • @theozonloch

    @theozonloch

    28 күн бұрын

    @@tomlee7956 pretty much what I said xD

  • @tomlee7956

    @tomlee7956

    28 күн бұрын

    @@theozonloch You might see an actual landing with a 50kt crosswind because the 38kt is maximum demonstrated and thus, it is not limiting.

  • @theozonloch

    @theozonloch

    28 күн бұрын

    @@tomlee7956 I know it's a reference but I can guarantee you that no pilot would land in a 50kt crosswind. And in most cases airlines SOPs are inline with the recommendatios from the manufacturer

  • @claudevieaul1465
    @claudevieaul146527 күн бұрын

    "Captain, you need to approach a but higher!" "Oh, Phuket..."

  • @dominiclester3232
    @dominiclester323226 күн бұрын

    The Texas airport seems to have a busy road much to close, with minimal barriers?

  • @8020drummer
    @8020drummer18 күн бұрын

    2:39 - runway heading. C'MON. You can make it.

  • @MarcelaR-dh1ok
    @MarcelaR-dh1ok6 күн бұрын

    That first still photo looks like St Maarten...Lived nearby...Beacon Hill...1977

  • @exsaper
    @exsaper27 күн бұрын

    Pause at 0:21 and measure the distance between engine and fence (not even ground). The engine diameter is around 3.3 meters. I clearly see that 2 engines can stack up and fit on top of the fence. This gives us around 6.6m, which is 20 feet.

  • @scottwhitmire6577
    @scottwhitmire657727 күн бұрын

    Perspective.🛫

  • @claire8699
    @claire869922 күн бұрын

    We own you 4 seconds of aviation

  • @israel_started_it_ALL_in_1948
    @israel_started_it_ALL_in_194827 күн бұрын

    oh wow

  • @ge2623
    @ge262328 күн бұрын

    Was that a car hitting that plane after it left the runway?

  • @--SPQR--

    @--SPQR--

    27 күн бұрын

    Nope, probably just a big cow doing 55.

  • @ge2623

    @ge2623

    27 күн бұрын

    @@--SPQR-- I hate speeding cows.

  • @jimpersing
    @jimpersing3 күн бұрын

    At 0:46 into the video the plane on the runway appears to be in front of the tree which appears to be well off the freeway?? Edited video? What else might be altered?

  • @Red_Lamborghini_aventador_J
    @Red_Lamborghini_aventador_J28 күн бұрын

    Lve the video

  • @slippydouglas
    @slippydouglas26 күн бұрын

    I appreciate that this is located in “Fuck it”, Thailand. Makes sense.

  • @LevinKeller-mo6cz
    @LevinKeller-mo6cz26 күн бұрын

    Crazy

  • @youp9546
    @youp954627 күн бұрын

    Non aviation guy here but I love the videos. Question: when landing is the voice giving the distance in meters or feet?

  • @CZedby

    @CZedby

    26 күн бұрын

    Feet, apparently.

  • @ElectricPics
    @ElectricPics27 күн бұрын

    Strictly speaking that's not the autopilot manipulating control surfaces itself, but the flight computer simply maintaining stability.

  • @rallyden
    @rallyden28 күн бұрын

    Hmmmmm, don’t think that was 50 kts of crosswind. During flare the wind was quartering down to less than 10.

  • @aditay
    @aditay26 күн бұрын

    Stood on that beach many times and lots of planes come in really low though I think that one takes the biscuit

  • @MidwestMotor
    @MidwestMotor26 күн бұрын

    1:05 - the people in that car can say "I was in an airplane accident," and we weren't even in the plane! Scary!

  • @TurningGuns
    @TurningGuns28 күн бұрын

    Poor Lance, by the numbers baby.

  • @Papaondas
    @Papaondas27 күн бұрын

    50ktz X wind without any crabing that is the joke of the week 😂

  • @ellenherstead586
    @ellenherstead58625 күн бұрын

    Unbelievable!

  • @3057luis
    @3057luis26 күн бұрын

    1-The different position of the camera makes not a good comparison; 2-50 knots crosswind?; 3-those camber flaps always work a lot, even in normal conditions (the external ailerons only work at low speeds, nowadays), they are less powerful than external ailerons because of less momentum

  • @felixx321
    @felixx32128 күн бұрын

    0:41 hasnt this clip made the rounds several times already?

  • @hattrick2219
    @hattrick221927 күн бұрын

    When we had rough air at cruise two things happened quickly....auto pilot turned off and speed was reduced. You let the aircraft go and gently corrected the pitch and roll.

  • @abiboy2412
    @abiboy241225 күн бұрын

    The humble flaperon works extremely hard whilst passengers sleep comfortably on their seats.

  • @adb012
    @adb01227 күн бұрын

    The 787's autopilot fighting turbulence to keep the plane stable is doing more than just keeping the wings level. In the 787 the ailerons also act as "direct lift" devices to counter increases and decreases of lift due to up and downdrafts, thus smoothing the ride, acting like the suspension of a car.

  • @Coretron

    @Coretron

    27 күн бұрын

    Fascinating. That was my favorite part of this video

  • @RomeoJulietCharlie

    @RomeoJulietCharlie

    27 күн бұрын

    It’s the flaperons and elevator which move to reduce the effects of turbulence. It’s called gust load suppression. Supposedly helps to reduce airsickness by a factor of 8! The ailerons are locked out at high speed, so the flaperons and spoilers provide roll control in the cruise.

  • @adb012

    @adb012

    26 күн бұрын

    @@RomeoJulietCharlie ... Thank you for correcting me. This "piece of control surface", that is, the "aileron" between the inboard flap and the outboard flap, was called "high speed aileron" in older models like the 727 and 747 (among others). And I am older so... 🙂. In those planes the outboard aileron (called "low speed aileron") was also locked at high speed and the "high-speed aileron" would do the rolling together with the spoilers. At low speed, high-speed aileron, low-speed aileron and spoilers would work together for roll control. The difference was that this high-speed aileron would not deflect together with the flaps when extending them. In the 787 (and 777) it does, hence "flaperon", as you said. But we were both talking about the same control surface.

  • @RomeoJulietCharlie

    @RomeoJulietCharlie

    25 күн бұрын

    @@adb012 thanks for the info! I never did get to fly the 747. We were retiring it, unfortunately, so I went down the 777 then 787 route after about a decade on little Airbuses.

  • @adb012

    @adb012

    25 күн бұрын

    @@RomeoJulietCharlie ... I never flew the 747 either, or the 727, or anything with more than 1 piston engine... 🙂. Hey, derailing the conversation, it's not every day that I have the chance to chat with someone that flew A and B. Quick silly survey 1) Sidestick or yoke? 2) Airbus's or Boeing's approach to FBW?

  • @jonathonhymel1802
    @jonathonhymel180226 күн бұрын

    The first pilot was like “my approach is off, Phuket”

  • @Desantisgogoboots
    @Desantisgogoboots3 күн бұрын

    Everyone in the comments: Mainly expert pilots Me: 1:55 reads "the autopilot" and thinks about "oh my god, the automatic pilot is deflating" lol. What a great movie.

  • @iflyplanes687
    @iflyplanes68728 күн бұрын

    “50 knots of crosswind on final” The wind was literally calm at touchdown. Over dramatized as usual😒

  • @Jake-1234

    @Jake-1234

    28 күн бұрын

    Yes but he didnt say it was 50knts on touchdown beacsue a plane would almost never land in that stenght of wind. Stop getting upset about things and acting like you were lied to when there was clearly no misinfomation.

  • @iflyplanes687

    @iflyplanes687

    28 күн бұрын

    @@Jake-123450 knots of wind on final is not noteworthy. “Handled perfectly by the pilot” It was a completely normal landing. If that was noteworthy, then I should be posting pictures of the 200 knot crosswind at cruise altitude for publicity and views too. The person who runs this channels is very well known for using subtitles that are misleading to potential viewers to gain viewership. They don’t deserve the credit it earns.

  • @Jake-1234

    @Jake-1234

    28 күн бұрын

    @@iflyplanes687 Im sorry firstly a plane would have a high chance of crashing at 200 knots so you clearly havent seen that before as a plane would never fly through winds like that. Secondly the crosswind max winf in knots for the 777 300 is 35 knots. quit yapping bro

  • @--SPQR--

    @--SPQR--

    27 күн бұрын

    ​@@Jake-1234my brother in christ just admit it's over dramatized, it's ok

  • @Jake-1234

    @Jake-1234

    27 күн бұрын

    @@--SPQR-- I aint your brother in christ so shut up and dotn insult me.

  • @rosemontterrace3469
    @rosemontterrace346924 күн бұрын

    Lancair was a throttle handle coming off. Not late braking

  • @BuriramBaz
    @BuriramBaz26 күн бұрын

    Aeroflot allowed to land in Thailand? Or old video?

  • @MeppyMan
    @MeppyMan27 күн бұрын

    1:25 notice the lack of crazy fast and excessive control inputs.

  • @ecbfilms001
    @ecbfilms00127 күн бұрын

    I never noticed how much Boeing's landing altitude voice sounds like Hank Hill

  • @user-by2ew9ys8u
    @user-by2ew9ys8u16 күн бұрын

    Good job, autopilot.

  • @hughrexon900
    @hughrexon90027 күн бұрын

    50 kt crosswind? The nav display shows single digit wind velocity in the flare. 😂

  • @paulis7319
    @paulis731926 күн бұрын

    **in the ER* Doc: What happened to you? Patient: I got bopped upside the head with a 777 tire. Doc: WTF

  • @heartfeltteaching
    @heartfeltteaching28 күн бұрын

    The second one is funny 😂

  • @MikeC2K10
    @MikeC2K1028 күн бұрын

    The SWISS 777-300ER clip would have been more interesting if the camera had stabilized on the cockpit, instead of the landscape outside the cockpit screen. :-)

  • @abdulbari7809
    @abdulbari780927 күн бұрын

    Why did the Boeing 777 300ER blush? Because it saw the runway threshold and approached below it to fast!

  • @vieuxbal1253
    @vieuxbal125327 күн бұрын

    At 0:55, I still can't believe there's a road at the end of the runway

  • @blackduckfarmcanada
    @blackduckfarmcanada27 күн бұрын

    The lancair landing looked like brake failure. Look at the smoke coming out of it

  • @Seawing44
    @Seawing4427 күн бұрын

    1:09 …. 50kt on final but wind calm during flare, no wind on ND !

  • @bluesatsunset
    @bluesatsunset27 күн бұрын

    777 X-wind limit is 38kts - The wind direction/speed indicator on the navigation display shows 11kts of crosswind for that approach & not 50kts. Clickbait.

  • @johan_tmst
    @johan_tmst28 күн бұрын

    Didn’t know Aeroflot was still operating in Thailand

  • @KevLaj
    @KevLaj28 күн бұрын

    LX7 crash was needless. Go around!

  • @wta1518
    @wta151824 күн бұрын

    0:37 To be fair to the pilot, it's hard to land when the heat index is 101105.

Келесі