DC-9 approach is wild

@nancyoffenhiser4916

25 күн бұрын

Yes, well done!

@vondahe

25 күн бұрын

That landing reminded me of Thai Airways’ old slogan: Smooth as silk.

@nathanielcruz6675

25 күн бұрын

Reminds us of the Kai Tak Airport.

@THEkr00Z3

25 күн бұрын

@@nathanielcruz6675 yay with that crazy approach especially how long ago it was

@reminiscecss

25 күн бұрын

pilot said "I've got controls...."

Damn that A350 take off tho...

@nunobarros3629

25 күн бұрын

Airbus’ version of the Plastic Princess.

@dfwplanespotters_yt

25 күн бұрын

it was a maintanence flight

@jcomet11299

25 күн бұрын

Getting close to C-17 level of take-off

@calvinhj3stransportation912

25 күн бұрын

​@@dfwplanespotters_ytIt was a ferry flight this plane was delivered brand new so they sent it to ATL to get out into service

@collinmsu

24 күн бұрын

I'm guessing it was empty.

DC-9 approach feels like the pilots passed out and the only knowledgable passenger is a guy very proficient in having fun in X-Plane

@piotrrys6313

20 күн бұрын

This is md80

@hhhbbhbhb

10 күн бұрын

@@piotrrys6313dc-9 is a different thing than a md-80, learn more

@derbars726

8 күн бұрын

Top comment XD

The DC9 landing was unreal, got to love those old time full mechanical blockage T/R's!

@trunkmonkey9417

25 күн бұрын

Still greased it! :)

@JTV84

24 күн бұрын

love them on the panavia tornado. i didn't realise until recently how quick they move.

@justing42

14 күн бұрын

They are called clamshells

That DC-9 landing was a thing of beauty! 😁

That DC-9 landing was a masterclass! Dang!

Very skilled pilot on that DC-9 approach. A350 is such a good looking aircraft

@Mach1-9538

21 күн бұрын

Better than Boeing I think 🤔

That A350 must have been an empty repositioning flight

@justing42

14 күн бұрын

It’s called a ferry

I honestly didn’t know Airbus had an STOL version of the A350.

@mrkiplingreallywasanexceed8311

25 күн бұрын

😂

@resadrecebli2263

25 күн бұрын

A340 watching this ☠️

@rtbrtb_dutchy4183

25 күн бұрын

@@resadrecebli2263340 can do the same when light.

@ronwyckoff824

25 күн бұрын

Probably empty

@nycres

20 күн бұрын

They're using it on their new transpacific flights from SNA. They'll make a killing!

The DL 763 tire blowing happened several years ago at DTW.

Good thing there was no strong wind shear at the time of that landing of that Anchorage jet....

@rtbrtb_dutchy4183

25 күн бұрын

Just like with any other landing.

@mlmson7098

24 күн бұрын

I have flown into Anchorage several times and I don't understand why the pilot landed that way. There is terrain approaching Stevens Airport that should require you to take that angle of approach to land.

Only the real ones know what happens when you blow a tire during takeoff 💀💀💀

@resadrecebli2263

25 күн бұрын

You land on a hotel unfortunately 😢

@iansmith5174

25 күн бұрын

RIP Concorde

@lynndale4718

24 күн бұрын

I'm pretty sure whoever does the crew's laundry is fully aware.

@hopfenundmalz99

17 күн бұрын

Air France 4590

Love the dc9 landing... so elegant

@leegalen8383

2 күн бұрын

Just kissed the ground ❤

Love the way DC9 landed 🤗

Wow the DC9 landing is so amazing

AirFrance pilot should seek out the MD-80 driver in Anchorage for some help with approach and landing technique.

Man, good crew on the DC9👌

Looks like a MD80 not DC9, but landing is just amazing. Probably wasn't stabilized but pilot did a great job.

It always freaks me out to see all the cabling and lines underneath the air brake flaps.

@yeet1337

25 күн бұрын

You mean the spoilers?

@lbowsk

25 күн бұрын

@@yeet1337 I rather like "air brake flaps". Sounds sexier than "spoilers".

@inncogneato6341

24 күн бұрын

@@yeet1337they’re all wing flaps at the end of the day.

@justing42

14 күн бұрын

@@inncogneato6341no they aren’t

thanks for the very nice video.. ✈✈

0:43 This is a MD83 - not a DC 9

I remember that day. I’d just did a line before trying to get on the ground.

Need a refresher in the definition of "gone wrong"

@iHatePolitics

25 күн бұрын

Each week it's the same with the clickbait titles. It's annoying.

Incredible stuff

Super cher lucaas 👍👍👍🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦

Air France seems to struggle a lot lately. Anyway, third attempt was a great one.

I was on a DC-9 in the 70s, was super loud at the back due to the adjacent engines...was also on a DC-8 in 1965

@user-od8vv9ro9l

21 күн бұрын

I wished I‘d experience the same man! Sick

@eljeffe8806

19 күн бұрын

BUT, if you get a seat in the front of the DC-9/MD-80 you could hear almost everything else since the engine noise was low. Re-engined DC-8s were cool too.

Good videos 📷👍

Nice clips!

Imagine being so lucky to experience 2 go arounds - my dream 😅

@iHatePolitics

25 күн бұрын

Once did two when landing at Seattle from London Heathrow. Very bumpy approach and a high crosswind. The first attempt, we could almost see in the general direction we were heading. The second was more of the same. I'm glad he got it down on the third attempt because otherwise we'd have been diverted to Portland in Oregon

It's an MD-83, not a DC-9 (and before people say it's technically a DC-9, it's an Maddog 83, almost nobody calls Maddogs DC-9s....)

0:43 IT’S A MD 80 DUDE

That DC9 landing must have a military pilot, that's mad.

Where was that 321 taking off from? Tatooine?

Crazy

The Anchorage landing took me back to the days on RAA Electras, landing on Adak with near zero visibility, and the pilot using bush pilot techniques, would essentially create enough visibility to set the bird down. Beats going on to Shemya or back to Anchorage! Bush pilots are the best!

Air France proving you really can always go around, if it don't look right coming down. :-)

That last clip::: Couldn't understand the last clip location, and closed caption couldn't either. Going by a sign in one of the buildings, stating 934th Airlift Wing, places it in Minneapolis Minnesota.

@dfwplanespotters_yt

25 күн бұрын

The last clip was in MSP/KMSP. It was a brand new aircraft, flying from MSP-ATL. Empty, maintenance ferry flight. Look up Calvin's MSP Aviation.

@theboardshorts

25 күн бұрын

2:30 "This Airbus A350 made a very short takeoff from Minneapolis."

N520DN is a brand new airplane, right before the Delta 2024 Olympics A350. probably on one of its first repo flights

what the hell im quite litterally looking at anchorage on flight radar lol

2:11 looks like Gran Canaria? Don’t remember them having that kind of weather in winter…

@Carlifurafollas

25 күн бұрын

It’s a very common meteorological phenomenon on the Canary Islands, it’s called Calima and is caused by Sahara’s desert dust in suspension.

@SteveKasian

25 күн бұрын

It's actually Flight Simulator. lol Total CGI. Look at the frame rate artifacts.

@kingsharkoon

24 күн бұрын

​@@SteveKasianyou literally need to touch grass 😅

@SteveKasian

21 күн бұрын

@@kingsharkoon I'm already touchin' cotton...

Great dc-9 landing.. wonder which cargo it works for it didn't appear to be an airline

A321 aborted take-off looks like LPA (Las Palmas, Gran Canaria)?

@MrFredericandre

25 күн бұрын

Yep with a strong Calima too, maybe the reason for instrument failure.

@Carlifurafollas

25 күн бұрын

It is indeed!

Another great video brother from the imperial county California 👍🇺🇲

767 takeoff with the blown tire reminds me of Nigeria Airways Flight 2120.

That md80 landed almost 6000 feet down the runway. Ridiculous.

That A350 was bad a**!!

Nice video

Check out landing at Isafjordur Iceland .

When this Arizona boy years ago flew out of Florida to the Cayman Islands in a 707, That's when I experienced what an actual storm was, And we landed on a runway about as long as airplane, yet that pilot didn't go around one time, I would be pretty nervous if we went around three times and there wasn't a hurricane..

Here's a valuable tip to Lucaas as he didn't seem to learn some subtle nuances after uploading so many videos. Never ever doctor the video with gimmicks like slow motion as it tends to spoil the authentic experience of the viewer. If you still feel the gimmicks need to be added then show the raw unedited footage FIRST and then replay the video again with the editing.

@lucaas

22 күн бұрын

The video was slowed down by the original uploader, not me

@verifiedtoxicangel2411

21 күн бұрын

@@lucaasCool... In that case, do him a favour and forward the comment to him. It wii also help you as all opinions here are reflecting on you as people tend to unsubscribe from YOUR channel and not his.

the DC-9 was a runway change

1:37 planes changed

How do I upload videos to this guy that posts these videos I have several take offs and landings

@44R0Ndin

25 күн бұрын

You upload them yourself here on KZread with just the original sound no music, and then you tell Lucaas that you have some footage they can use, and they might or might not use it. They might have a thing where you have to send them an email granting them permission to use your footage "officially", for reasons of avoiding copyright strikes, I'm not sure.

@hurndaddy2

18 күн бұрын

@@44R0Ndin I'm not sure how to do that

❤ from India

I heard that guy just didn't want to land cuz he was watching the in flight movie and hadn't finished his complimentary bag of honey roasted peanuts.

Dc9 pilot ex navy lol

Cool

My friends that DC-9 pilot has been flying in ALaska his or her entire life I think?? That was greasy as hell!! You see the timing on the reverse thrust too? haha....he was feeling it that day. The old line between good and cocky sure means a lot in flying. Confidence kills just as easy as it is required too.

"Aye-r-buss"?

76 from Metro…heading to MUC?

bro the a220 has to go arounds 2 TIMES.

The second video is what would I do on a flight simulator

Luckily, no one was injured...

Oh wait, so you were talking about the DC nine well, the DC nine. There’s something wrong with something and actually the pilots were actually drunk so they click the button and then bow they’re dead.

Why continue to destination with a blown tyre? Surely retracting that blown tyre into the landing gear bay poses a risk?

✈️

The 350 was empty.

DC-9...not exactly a "stabilized approach" 😮

I don't think pulling landing gear up was good decision. Tire or brakes could be on fire.

@44R0Ndin

25 күн бұрын

Agreed, tire could have also been flapping around and wrapped itself around something important in the landing gear bay, which would have been even more problematic.

@ronwyckoff824

25 күн бұрын

Odds are he didn't know.

@lbowsk

25 күн бұрын

How else you going to meet second segment climb? Is the gear well designed to hold a flaming tire? Why assume they're on fire? Do you think the crew knew that they blew a tire?

Air France took three attempts - but it was the right choice as it was a safe landing.

A220 is difficult to land with crosswind. Not because he can’t stand it, but because of its certification.

Every media outlet in America right now Boeing jets have faulty tires

DC-9 got 3rd person

W vid

MD 80 no es dc9

third and successful attempt ❌ third and final attempt 💀

DC-9 pilot probably just reliving his Navy days flying into GTMO. You have to basically do a stop, drop and roll on approach to avoid Cuban airspace. Pucker factor of 10.

clearly the blown tire is Boeing's fault

Delta flying more Airbus than Boeing…….

@eljeffe8806

19 күн бұрын

Delta quietly retired their 777's during the pandemic and all their newer twin-aisle aircraft are Airbus. They like their 767/757 fleet

Bruh whatdehell

or the bottom was wrong.

Airbus for da wiiiin

I can't believe how much that plane slowed down just because of a blown tire.

@PaintSociety

25 күн бұрын

Its edited in slo mo

@umarseries7301

25 күн бұрын

That slo mo ruined the scene

@lolzlolz102

25 күн бұрын

@@PaintSociety The slo mo is clearly still faster than you.

@PaintSociety

25 күн бұрын

@@lolzlolz102 thank you.

There is no 767

Seriously dude? Why didn’t you mention the 76 video was 12 years old?

of course its a boing

@kingssuck06

25 күн бұрын

Yeah cause Boeing makes tires

The falloff is insane

Of course boeing again lol💀💀💀

That DC-9 approach is animation.

@saito125

25 күн бұрын

Not. The pilot was asked by the tower if he could switch runways because of a 747 coming fast behind him.

@johnschmidt8440

25 күн бұрын

@@saito125 How do you know that?

The 767's take-off wasn't "wrong." A tire blew almost at the time that the plane reached take-off speed. At that point, pilots are trained to quickly assess the situation and decide to either abort the take-off or continue it. The pilots did what they were trained to do and chose to continue the take-off. If the pilots had made a different choice, the 767 could have come to a stop before the end of the runway, as 767s are designed and built to do. If the problem had been different and an engine had blown instead of a tire, the pilots could have continued the take-off and climbed out on one engine because twin-engine airliners are designed and built to do that, too. This time, the pilots continued the take-off, burned off a lot of fuel, and safely delivered their passengers to the destination on their tickets.

@BrandyBalloon

25 күн бұрын

It's also likely they weren't aware of it at all.

Boeing is awesome! What a great American company. God bless the heroes at Boeing let freedom fly.🇺🇸✈️😎⛪️

Yeah I think his call sign is dc big balls.... I like your longer vids..

The 767 takeoff goes wrong at 2:00 is Flight Simulator, you dingus. You can tell by how the framerate stutters at precise intervals, to say nothing of the anti-aliasing falling short on the edges of the scenery objects, and the visibility falling off like CGI rather than how it does in IRL. I called it within the first 2 seconds. If you would be original and not try to copy the original guy who does these videos, maybe you would be a bit more observant.

@verifiedtoxicangel2411

22 күн бұрын

So why is it that you are the only one who feels that way ? There are actual aviators on this channel who'd call it out, or maybe you're the type who calls a dog mad and shoots it

@SteveKasian

21 күн бұрын

@@verifiedtoxicangel2411 People are gullible and dumb. That is an age-old fact of life that is made CLEARLY evident on youtube!

The take-off did not go wrong. It was successful.

Gee Airbus had a problem with instruments!!!!!!

Clickbait. Just a blown tire! Takeoff went just fine. How about 767 blows tire on takeoff roll. 🙄

@Imlegitthatonedude

25 күн бұрын

I mean, it did went wrong. They expected the takeoff to be normal and smooth. Not to deal with a blown tire.

😊🖖💪👊👍🍻

What is up with the 767-300's? They always are having issues. And that Anchorage plane isn't a DC-9 It's a MD-80. Though technically you can call it a DC-9 Super 80. (DC-9-80) MD-80's have bigger engines than the DC-9's had. DC-9's had the JT8D-17 family of engines. This plane at 1:15 had the JT8D-200 family of engines (bigger than the 17's)

boeing is going to go out of buisness