That A350 climbs better on one engine than any Aerosucre 727 on all three...

@u2bear377

5 күн бұрын

Any Aerosucre 727 packs more cargo than that A350.

@counterfit5

5 күн бұрын

​@@u2bear377impressive, since a 350-1000's payload capacity isn't too much lower than a 727's MTOW

@gregedwards1087

5 күн бұрын

Aerosucre always loads the aircraft to capacity (MTOW) first and then they load the 5 tonnes of cocaine so they can say that the aircraft did not have any contraband on it when it does crash, "..........no, here is the load sheet, as you can see it is fully loaded with legit stuff, no cocaine here.....", meanwhile the burning cocaine is getting everyone in the area high.

@AA-tz2bm

3 күн бұрын

tbh those 727s are past or close to their mgtow.

@muzzcovw7674

3 күн бұрын

😆🤣🤣 SO true!

Those tests where only one engine is used are always so cool. I remember back in the day MD-11 was advertised as a 'safe plane' since it could fly only with two engines🤣

@LightSpeedFury01YT

6 күн бұрын

American Airlines 232 (yea ik it's a dc10 but it applies still)

@toms5996

6 күн бұрын

@@LightSpeedFury01YT I flew in a Finnair MD-11 in 1990 - one of the first ever. It suffered an electrical malfunction and had to make an emergency landing. Lights and air went out - it was exciting for this young guy.

@mrkhoros

6 күн бұрын

the test on this video is done with both engines. You can clearly see the smoke coming from both upon take off.

@toms5996

5 күн бұрын

@@mrkhoros Might be correct and looks that way. Facts are all over the place with these clips lol What is not fiction though, is that that DC-10 and MD-11 were advertised as 'safe' as they could fly with only two engines.

@TheHobohobbit

5 күн бұрын

@@mrkhoros I imagine that they still keep the engine turned on but just leave it at idle in case they need the extra power. since this was just a test and not a real emergency, they also could have been using both engines at half the normal power to simulate one engine power, again in case of problems.

That takeoff simulated a LOSS of engine at V1, reducing one engine's thrust near the last point of being able to abort takeoff. Started with TWO ENGINES and left ground with ONE full throttle.

@geoffmesser5091

4 күн бұрын

Back when pilots could have guests in the cockpit I sat in the engineer’s seat of a 767 for takeoff on the short runway at Mascot (Sydney). The skipper (my wife’s cousin) pointed out marker beside the runway and the airspeed indicator and told me that the pilots breathe easier when the airspeed passes the magic point prior to that marker.

@rtbrtb_dutchy4183

3 күн бұрын

@@geoffmesser5091the 767 doesn’t have an engineer. And nobody looks at airport markings for that either. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Sped-up video for Svalbard creates one terrifying landing.

@davidvavra9113

5 күн бұрын

I half expected them to catch a cable with a tail hook

All commercial aircraft equipped with two engines or more are flight tested and certified to take off with one engine out at MTOW.

2:38 "Hey mister, you want to hear the most annoying sound in the world?"

@Themilkmanskid.

5 күн бұрын

Funny, but funnier when imagining the movie when reading the comment.😄 Nice one!

St. Elmos fire also usedti happen on the masts of ships at sea during storms.

@JobyFluorine-ru4bd

4 күн бұрын

It happens on my Mercedes as I'm decelerating from light speed.

Was that landing gear audio really needed 😂

@swedishpsychopath8795

5 күн бұрын

That happens on my car too. (yes - it has landing gear)

@TunnelJumper

5 күн бұрын

I don’t understand everyone’s issue with the audio here. Aren’t we all here over a shared love of aviation? This is part of it. I’d be more annoyed if the landing gear clips had some stupid music over them.

@JobyFluorine-ru4bd

4 күн бұрын

Probably headphone users. It's annoying AF when the audio volume jumps from 4 to 11.

@Rowan_Daashir

Күн бұрын

That’s the hydraulic system for ya🙃

the quality & cameramanship on some of these has gotten to be awesome

That 737 that landed with no flaps. Looks like it stopped on the runway? And it might well have been checked for hot brakes.

@TheHobohobbit

5 күн бұрын

Most decent sized runways these days are more than big enough to handle a small plane like a 737 landing fast without needing to stress the brake too hard

@counterfit5

5 күн бұрын

Had a bit of a wiggle a couple hundred feet after touchdown, too

The landing gear looks so heavy duty. Love it!

There's someone on the wing, some ... Thing.

always makes my night mate, cheers

It was funny recognizing Svalbard from the ProMods map expansion for Euro Truck Simulator 2. Not a perfect replica, but you can see it’s the same place. They did a good job there.

Daaaamn headphone alert for the 777 section…. Lolol

Great video thanks 😊😊

The S1 failure test was interesting, very good systems on the jet and pilot control for centerline!

If you have passed V1 you must take off with one engine. The airplane is designed to do it that way If necessary.

@joshuahudson2170

5 күн бұрын

There was a case of a mandatory rejected takeoff after V1; airplane had suffered some kind of hydraulic failure and could not be controlled via aerodynamic surfaces. Thrust reversers were used and they overran into the runway lights. Could have been a lot worse.

@FenrirKi

5 күн бұрын

@@joshuahudson2170 Yes if other systems are malfunctional and the plane is not flyable, otherwise it's better to take off and then landing again.

Your vibe is infectious, love watching your content!

Looks like it's still running both engines though, you can see the exhaust gas

@bertg.6056

6 күн бұрын

#1 was at flight idle for this test.

@samuelstarbati8393

6 күн бұрын

Exactly

@TheHobohobbit

5 күн бұрын

Since it is just a test they don't want to fully power down the engine just in case they need full power at short notice

@bertg.6056

5 күн бұрын

@@TheHobohobbit Exactly. #1 was kept at idle in case a safety issue arose.

@aabbcc5154

2 сағат бұрын

REPORT HER FOR LIAR. GIVE IT THUMBS DOWN.

The more I watch the videos, the more I move away from flying. It's like I'm living by chance.🌺 Thanks for the video..

Both engines are running . Exhaust can easily be seen in almost equal amounts coming from both sides

@aabbcc5154

2 сағат бұрын

RIGHT ON! SHE BE A DITY DIRTY LIAR. JUST A BUM WANTING CLICKS. FOKO HER. REPORT AND 2 THUMS DOWN

Awesome 😎 videos 📸

Commercial airline test pilots are one of the bravest people on earth!

@aabbcc5154

2 сағат бұрын

LOL NO

0:37 I see 2 engines at work

0:40 Boeing 737 slat failure: engineers have said the wiring to the wings on some aircraft is not routed correctly, which could lead to flap and slat malfunctions. With all of the flap failures, I'm wondering if it's related.

@gregedwards1087

5 күн бұрын

Boing (sic) strikes again.

@user-mp9rd4hg8b

5 күн бұрын

@@gregedwards1087 what are you talking about? Who Said "Boing?"

The rear landing gear rotates?

@counterfit5

5 күн бұрын

Yeah, on 777s, 747s, and maybe a couple Airbuses have steering on the rear to reduce turning circles on the ground

@Rowan_Daashir

Күн бұрын

The rear landing gear rotates when the nose landing gear reaches a certain angle

That’s crazy

I Want To Become a Airplane Engineer when i grow up

Does st Elmo’s fire flash like that or is is more a flicker that the camera can’t see

@EllipticGeometry

5 күн бұрын

Should be pretty accurate. The flashes aren’t regular or tied to the frame rate. It also looks like a 360° shutter which is less susceptible to such effects.

@brucebaxter6923

5 күн бұрын

@@EllipticGeometry Wellllllllll Typical shutter speed is half the frame rate so you start at missing half the images. I’m guessing this is a camaeraphone and thay run about 1/200 so it misses 90% of the images. So by inferences you would expect ten times the flashes. That’s at least a flicker of not a constant.

@EllipticGeometry

5 күн бұрын

@@brucebaxter6923 You can tell by the motion blur that it’s going straight from one exposure to the next. Stop pulling numbers out of thin air. Devices like this use a large range, indeed going for 360 degrees in low light.

@brucebaxter6923

5 күн бұрын

@@EllipticGeometry look up the manufacturers specs. Why would I make it up, I’m already online and manufacturers post their specs

The 737 landing without flaps did have the leading edge slats deployed. These devices lower stall speed considerably.

Great video brother from the imperial county California 👍🇺🇲

I don't know why, but I kind of want St. Elmo's Fire simulated in X-Plane 12 if it's possible. LOL

That annoying noise on the landing gear clip is probably the electric hydraulic pump. It was probably running for the nose steering test.

@Rowan_Daashir

20 сағат бұрын

We were testing the main gear actuators after the right hand one had been replaced

No thanks on that tiny northern runway landing.

the first video, " take off with only one engine " : are you sure ? because we can clearly see smoke and heat escape from the 2 engines at 0:30

@yodaas7902

6 күн бұрын

The engine is likely on idle

@mykneegrow2819

5 күн бұрын

Looked to me like they weren’t gonna be able to rotate safely and the second engine spooled up

@mykneegrow2819

5 күн бұрын

An idle engine wouldn’t leave a trail like that. You can see an equal amount of visible propulsion

@timodonnell6104

5 күн бұрын

@@mykneegrow2819if the test was simulating an engine loss at V1, wouldn’t you have to have both engines operating up until V1, then you shut down the thrust from one engine?

@MrSchwabentier

5 күн бұрын

@@mykneegrow2819 the test ends at 0:30 where they throttle up. you can also see it looking at the rudder

A350 is performing a max T/O weight engine failure at V1, with Flex49 limit.

This A350-1000 test flight at BSL airport is around 6 years ago! No news

I've done it before... in a Cessna 152 💀

Whats the song name?

Shortly after take-off, exhaust is coming out of the engine that was 'out'.

@aabbcc5154

2 сағат бұрын

AIRBUS: RIGHT ON. THIS BIA IS A FOKOKING LIAR. SHE MAKES PENNIES FRON YOUTUB CLICKS. WHAT A SORRY LIFE. JUST A BUM JOB.

@aabbcc5154

2 сағат бұрын

REPORT HER FOR LIAR. GIVE IT THUMBS DOWN.

Sure looks to me like there are exhaust plums on both engines, and the left side plum is noticeably lighter than the right

@GWNorth-db8vn

5 күн бұрын

One's at idle. They might have the other a hair below full throttle to simulate it being completely out. "Reduce thrust to idle" is the first item on a lot of Loss of Power checklists.

@me734

5 күн бұрын

@@GWNorth-db8vn Thanks for clarifying this

@inncogneato6341

3 күн бұрын

Plum? Plums?

@me734

2 күн бұрын

@@inncogneato6341 I stand corrected on the spelling error(s), missing the E, should have typed Plumes.

Well the engine test doesn't look correct, you can see both exhaust plumes from both engines...

@Nebulous361

6 күн бұрын

I presume the other engine was at or close to idle encase they needed it.

@persique7765

6 күн бұрын

they'll never cut one engine just in case the other one isn't enough. One of them was in Idle

@Tom-ok2rh

5 күн бұрын

That what I saw too. Plus why test a takeoff with one engine? Wouldn’t the flight be aborted if an engine failed at takeoff? I knew a plane can fly with one engine because it’s already in the air I never knew it could take off with only one.

@HiddenWindshield

5 күн бұрын

@@Tom-ok2rh Once you're passed V1, there's not enough runway left to bring the plane to a safe stop. Hence, all commercial airplanes need to be able to continue the takeoff, even if one engine fails after V1, because that's safer than going off the end of the runway.

@argosy440

5 күн бұрын

​@@Tom-ok2rhyou can't abort take off at V1. You have to carry on with the takeoff. That's why they performed this test

when you have to adjust for the single engine 🙂

That is an A340-200 with two engines and incorrect paint job

@TheHobohobbit

5 күн бұрын

Which one?

I see smoke trailing from both engines in that 1st clip….

I see smoke on both

@MrSchwabentier

5 күн бұрын

yes, when they throttle the engine back up. The test ends at around 0:28

0:27 I'm seeing 2 exhaust trails from both the engines - is there something I'm missing? It doesn't look like a single engine takeoff like Lucas said

@MrSchwabentier

5 күн бұрын

one engine is in idle. of course they don't switch it off, that would be unnecessarily risky. you can also see the throttling it back up at the 0:30 mark

@mindplanes

5 күн бұрын

@@MrSchwabentierperfect explanation

Struggling to climb you mean

Thank god it wasn't a revenue flight intentionally being flown on asymmetric thrust from takeoff LMFAO

2:38 thanks for leaving the ear killing screeching in the video, great editing!🎉

Do they do that engine test with a full load of fuel and passenger weight.

@inncogneato6341

3 күн бұрын

Probably not. At best would be no passengers and full fuel.

I downloaded fiveM and searched for your server it didn't appear so i connected directly to the server but every time it says loading or failed to load

@aabbcc5154

2 сағат бұрын

RIGHT ON

regular dose of Boeing with issues

Bad clickbait title one again

@JobyFluorine-ru4bd

4 күн бұрын

Yeah, it was misleading, but technically true.

@aabbcc5154

2 сағат бұрын

REPORT HER FOR LIAR. GIVE IT THUMBS DOWN.

What does the fox say?

@xploration1437

6 күн бұрын

Corn Pop was a bad dude

@brocanova

5 күн бұрын

ratatatatatatatatatataaatatata

how did it takeoff with one engine??????????

@TheHobohobbit

5 күн бұрын

That's the sheer power of the RR Trent engines

@chaitanyarao5546

5 күн бұрын

Twin engine aircraft are required by regulation to be operable with a single engine in case the other engine fails so manufacturers pull out all stops to ensure that they do

It wasn't struggling to take off.

One engine , no people.

@gregedwards1087

5 күн бұрын

But still at MTOW. That is the requirement for the certification.

SUNN COUNTRYYYYY

COMPLETELY unnecessary hot brakes for the no-flap Sun Country! Just a slight flare, roll-on, use all the runway... walk in the park. 🙄

He didn't try to take off; he did take off. Try to write in correct English

give aerosucre that a350

@chaitanyarao5546

5 күн бұрын

Too brand new, maybe in 50-60 years they might take up one 😂

Interesting content, but bad title.

The pilot didn't TRY to take off. It DID take off. AND there were two engines running, not just one. Two exhaust trails can clearly be seen from both left and right fans. More lies.

@rtbrtb_dutchy4183

3 күн бұрын

They will never shut down that engine. They bring it to idle instead.

@inncogneato6341

3 күн бұрын

@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183Exactly. Lucaas loves his clickbait, but he’s not THAT bad.

@aabbcc5154

2 сағат бұрын

REPORT HER FOR LIAR. GIVE IT THUMBS DOWN.

fu ai

@alexhayward1442

5 күн бұрын

It’s not ai

If it's a Boeing, I ain't Going.

@AviationLoverIndonesia

5 күн бұрын

Yeah whatever 🗿🗿

But planes can’t take off with one engine They are stopped and they are taken to a different plane to fly to the destination. But I also know that you can do practice takeoffs with one engine.

@samuelstarbati8393

6 күн бұрын

Yes they can, they are designed to take off with one engine while being at max take off weight. Otherwise imagine an airplane taking off fully loaded and having an engine failure just before lift off, it would crash if one engine would not be strong enough

@Agent_36

6 күн бұрын

@@samuelstarbati8393 dude I know that I didn’t look at the video. I’m a pilot and I know what planes are and how they are handled. I’ve done takeoffs with one engine and landings with no engine for practice. I fly smaller and private planes.

@leadr_

6 күн бұрын

Prick ​@@Agent_36

@samuelstarbati8393

6 күн бұрын

​@@Agent_36lol how am I supposed to know with the amount of stupidity in the internet nowadays, just tried to educate ;)

@Agent_36

6 күн бұрын

@@samuelstarbati8393 okay that’s fair because people are really frickin stupid nowadays because of all this weird talk people are doing and stupid stuff