0:02 Hello guys! When it comes to the volume of selling, Airbus has already outrun Boeing. But I just wanted to give some kind of Symbolic meaning of a manufacturer who had been a champion for a long time. Also.. Regarding introducing airplanes ever produced from both companies, I purposely left out some of them since it's too many and I thought that it could be better to say it as a family if possible, like A320 family or A300 family.. Lots of you have left the comments saying I missed A310 😅 That's the reason why!! One more thing.. Sidestick of Airbus was introduced in 1987 by A320, not in 1994 by A330.. my bad! Idea that I wanted to give you was not letting you know the exact time but like.. "it's been long ago.. concept" anyway.. I should have been more careful! Thank you for watching and comments 😊👍

@navsofour2892

2 ай бұрын

Sidestick of Airbus was introduced in 1987 by A320, and it crashed during test demonstrations on first flight with passengers due to error on fly-by-wire.

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

@@navsofour2892 didn't know that.. thanks for letting me know it!!~

@robertcharlessceats3647

2 ай бұрын

Your argument in respect of omitting specific reference to the A310 is illogical when you have named every other

@jcheck6

2 ай бұрын

@@navsofour2892 I think you have the reason wrong.

@dragdritt

2 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 What you said about Boieng's approach to "putting computers on planes" made me curious about your thoughts about all the trouble with the 737-800 MAX, and what was (how I've understood it) issues with something that was supposed to help keep the plane level, but ended up making the plane nosedive. Now I'm not sure if you can talk about specifics like that, but is a result of Boeing trying (and I guess failing) to change their approach? Edit* After writing this comment I saw that you had a dedicated video on this subject.

Airbus has fixed the flaw of not communicating with the other pilot. Even with AF447 before this change was made, the side stick actually vibrates heavily to let you know that the other pilot is also trying to control the aircraft

@captainjksaviationlife248

5 ай бұрын

Exactly!! Though I'd flown A330 for more than 15years, the only thing I didn't like was what you just mentioned

@rael5469

2 ай бұрын

"the side stick actually vibrates heavily to let you know that the other pilot is also trying to control the aircraft" On the A320 family the aircraft will say "DUAL INPUT." You can't miss it unless you are deaf.

@HomerNarr

2 ай бұрын

Good, i would imagine even more Force Feedback might be a good idea. But that is me a PC Gamer talking

@encinobalboa

9 күн бұрын

Airbus did not fix the dual input at AF447. AirAsia had dual input which led to stall.

@rael5469

9 күн бұрын

@@encinobalboa What ?

Boeing needs Airbus and Airbus needs Boeing. Competition pushes innovation otherwise they stagnate. I love them both.

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

That's exactly what I'm thinking 😊

@2adamast

2 ай бұрын

It's more complicated, the 320 Neo pushed to the 737 Max, but it's market awareness that pushed the 320 Neo.

@peterwalther5273

2 ай бұрын

To cooperate is obviously a better way to develop a make progress than competition. Scientists in universities around the world share information with each other for that reason. Competition is to make money for your self or your corporation.

@richardmartin7824

2 ай бұрын

In a word McF, Yes.

@tscheburaschka4851

2 ай бұрын

Maybe, or just introduce sanctions. Nowadays that’s the American way to go. Wasn’t that’s the case between 2016-2020?

The neighbour of my grand parents is a retired (2018) Lufthansa pilot. He too flew both and for him Airbus has the upper hand.

Fascinating to hear a captain pilot's perspective, thank you! As a frequent international passenger in the past on many brands of planes I had no problem with boarding a Boeing 737 jurassic or classic, 747 or 777 nor a noisy and vibrating DC 9 ascending steeply into the clouds. These days I would flatly refuse to board any Boeing aircraft, especially the 737Max series. I'd make sure my airline bookings result in Airbus travel of any kind with the A380 as the preferred option, most stable and quiet even in economy class!

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Hello ~ 😊 Thank you so much for your comment!! Boeing.. it's so sad.. I just hope that they could change quite a bit.. so people would turn their eyes to them.

@rolfgerig9829

2 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 Yes it is sad indeed, after the merger of Boeing with McDouglas things went only according to profit, ingnoring even their own engineers warnings, so typically USA! For your own personal saftey and your passengers, please apply your inborn wisdom and refuse to pilot any Boeing Aircraft if you can. Soon you might be in a position to fly C919 and Airbus only! I as a technically inclined often marvel at the required knowledge, calm of mind, concentration and skill needed to fly a modern airliner whilst I am struggling to drive a modern vehicle safely on the road. My highest respect and best wishes. 👍

@haarp-infamous

Ай бұрын

I do the same. If there's only boeings flying, I will stay on the ground.

Nice video. apart from the yoke difference, most videos focus on the outer difference. nice to see an in-depth perspective of the cockpit diferences

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for your comment! 😊

@conned

2 ай бұрын

Not just outer,or indepth, even their fcoms, fppm, completely different, Boeing manuals are very graphical, airlines tailored them to tables, different colors for diff scenarios,Blue for Wet/TO， Airbus manuals explained more,better organized, more details in Flt Planning, u will not find CLB/DSC info on Boeing, nor ISA∆>>so, it takes a very hands-on n focus guys to fly Boeing, even downright to Dispatch n AME,..we used to use our I.Ds as rulers to plot RTOW years back, today it's on iPad...Flysmart, OPT, Foreflight, just don't Fly stupid. Ha..safe skies everyone!

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

@@conned ID as a ruler 😄😁 FlySmart was so impresive when I first faced it! and.. I remember that was quite long time ago when Boeing had nothing like that

@conned

2 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 wait till u see Mission+ or Fltdeck Pro ... currently using Foreflight+ ... awesome tool,

I follow a lot of aviation channels but this one stood out to be one of the best. Well made, edited and full of ultra useful content. Thank you.

@captainjksaviationlife248

4 ай бұрын

Thank you so much.. your comment means a lot to me!! 😉

Nope. Airbus is the BIGGEST manufacturer in the world NOW.

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Yepp! you're right.. But please see the comment that I have left and pinned at the top.

@ginog5037

2 ай бұрын

That's not correct if you take in all the military and space programs. Boeing is by far bigger, not including all the joint ventures.

Very good video. You can give an expert opinion for sure. I am a retired Mechanic and would like to say I prefer the Airbus too. I like the way the Airbuses computer systems help the Mechanic troubleshooting faults. As a passenger, I feel more comfortable. When I worked Sheet Metal on Boeing aircraft, I found the materials a little beefier. On the Airbus, everything is precision made so replacement parts almost always aligned up with the pilot holes. I heard the old saying "If it's not Boeing, I'm not going" but I think that will be going away soon. Boeing has some catching up to do with Airbus. You are so right about the differences. Thank you.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Hello~ As opposed to your comment, the mechanics who I used to talk with in KAL prefer to be in Boeing planes. They said that Airbus ones brought up a lot of computer errors. But I personally lean a little towards Airbus 😊

05:38 - Airbus introduced sidesticks on A320 in 1988, not on the A330 in 1993.

@captainjksaviationlife248

4 ай бұрын

You're right.. my mistake, because I have only flown A330.. I just wanted to say that the sidestick was introduced pretty early

@richiet6381

2 ай бұрын

Very enjoyable video I’m very glad the algorithm let me hear. #Following

@richiet6381

2 ай бұрын

Aloha from Kapaa Hawaii

This was educational and well-presented, thank you! More, you come across the screen as super trustworthy.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for your comment!!~

I am a twice yearly passenger going from Manila to USA and back. Ride on economy claas of A350-900 and B777-300 and felt the comfort of Airbus vs Boeing thru their seating arrangement. Hope Boeing will improve the passengers comfort in their next and new production line of Boeing passenger planes.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Yes.. I also hope so. Boeing... they really need some time to reconfigure everything~

@ross9581

3 ай бұрын

I flew a lot on different routes around Asia. I like 777 and 747. I never fly and will never on Max's. I will also not fly anymore on 787. I like A350 and maybe one day, if lucky I could try a 380.@@captainjksaviationlife248

@davidtop6242

3 ай бұрын

This has more to do with airlines choice of layouts.

@yasminbarry7941

3 ай бұрын

Wouldn't seat comfort be for the airline to take care of?

@rogerk6180

3 ай бұрын

​@@yasminbarry7941the cabin comfort and especially noise and vibration seems to be better on comparable airbus planes. I think that is what he means.

I am french, and thank you for comparing that. Very interesting

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Merci d'avoir regardé 😉 Have a great weekend~!!

@lepoetegribouille1532

2 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 Merci à vous pour votre objectivité.

항덕에 입문하고 싶은 1인입니다. 두 항공사의 퀄높은 비교영상으로 더욱더 이해가 잘 됩니다. 따로 노트해서 암기라도 하고싶을 정도네요ㅎㅎ. 감사합니다

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

감사한 댓글.. 너무 고맙습니다! 형광펜 드릴까요? ㅎㅎ 좋은 주말되세요 😉

안녕하세요 기장님😊 전 학창시절부터 소문난 항덕이라 늘 파일럿 입장에서의 보잉,에어버스의 차이에 대해 궁금했는데 이렇게 자세하게 설명해주셔서 정말 좋았습니다 왜 진작 기장님 블로그를 몰랐던건지 ㅠㅠ 이제라도 알았으니 다행이네요! 😁 진짜 시절이 좋아져서 제가 다 호강하네요 ㅎㅎ 영어도 영어권국가에서 11년째 살며 NZ에서 일한 저보다 유창하시니 역시 캡틴은 아무나 되는게 아니라는걸 느끼고 갑니다! (사실 첨엔 랜덤영상으로 뜨길래 밤에 눈감고 들었는데 발음이 좋으셔서 놀랐어요) 앞으로도 좋은 영상 기대하겠습니다💕

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

극찬으로 가득하네요 댓글이 😂 너무 감사합니다^^ 영어는 공부중입니다. 스크립트를 쓰면서 영상을 준비하지만.. 정말 서서히 느네요. 요즘은 원어민 친구 한명있는게 작은 바램입니다. 유튜브에 좋은 쌤들이 많지만 혼자 하다보면 한계가 금방 느껴져요 ㅎㅎ 암튼 감사드려요 😃😄

Nice video. Always good when a pilot talks about the differences between Boeing and Airbus after flying both.

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

Hello hi~ Hmm.. it's not easy to give you the answer. But something calls to mind suddenly.. The wildest animal was B737, every time I was shooting an approach, it gave me real fun. But in terms of airline operations with passengers, and to meet a lot of company regulations, I feel more comfortable when I'm in Airbus. Thank you very much for comment, buddy!! 😊

@CoasterGuy787

8 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 Ah I see so no preference btwn the A330 and 787 in handling. The 737 requires more inputs anytime it's disturbed in flight since it's just a typical basic airliner as far as manual hand flying goes, without the automatic hand flying assistance that the A330 and 787 has, whereas both would fight against disturbances thanks to the use of roll rate, pitch rate and g-load. The Airbus cockpit I always hear is very comfortable, so much so that even Boeing's best attempt with pilot comfort, the 787, pales in comparison to the Airbus. Thanks for the reply :) I'm definitely sharing this video.

@user-jv1ze7uz9n

Ай бұрын

Thank you captain for sharing your experience with the planes ,we passengers rarely have such insight. Safe flying if you are still on the job!

The perspective of an experienced pilot that flew planes from both competing companies was very insightful! At the end, I was surprised by your personal preference for Airbus.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Good to have you here!! Maybe that's because.. I'd spent most of the time in A330 😄

@rtbrtb_dutchy4183

3 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248I’m new on Airbus products and have most of my time on Boeings. Airbus edges out for me as well. But in order to do so, as a pilot coming off Boeings, you have to drop the Boeing philosophy in order to fully embrace the Airbus. If you want to fly your Airbus, with “how Boeing does things” on your mind, you will never understand the Airbus.

@10against1

2 ай бұрын

With fly by wire a side stick is better. Because except for takeoff and landing the majority of time the autopilot is flying and a yoke takes up room. Similar to having a physical keyboard on a smart phone when majority of time one is consuming content not inputting it with keyboard.

@rtbrtb_dutchy4183

2 ай бұрын

@@10against1 has nothing to do with fly by wire in regards to autopilot usage. Both the side stick and yoke have their pros and cons.

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

@@10against1 Yepp~! Agreed 👍🏻👍🏻

안녕하세요 기장님. 파일럿을 꿈꾸며 공부 중입니다. 요즘 한국 항공사에 외국 조종사들도 제법 많이 고용된다고 들었는데, 반대로 외국 항공사들도 한국 조종사들을 많이 고용하나요? 항공사를 꼭 한국 항공사를 목적으로 하지않더라도 괜찮을까싶습니다. 또 파일럿에게 가장 크게 느껴지는 해외 항공사(대표적으로 미국, 일본 등)과 한국 항공사의 차이점도 궁금합니다

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

안녕하세요, 지금은 코로나로 모든 게 정상이 아직은 아닙니다. 예전에는 중국, 일본, 베트남, 태국, 중동 등 많은 한국 조종사들이 해외로 진출했지요. 물론 거꾸로 한국도 K사 같은 경우 제가 있을 때 외국인 기장이 엄청 많이 있었지요. 앞으로 상황이 더 호전된다면 나이가 또 많지 않다면 해외로 나가는 것도 나쁘게 보지는 않습니다. 다만 중국의 경우는, 아주 독특한 특성들로 사실 스트레스가 꽤 컸었습니다. 주로 훈련, 심사와 관련된 것이었죠. 다른 나라들은 그렇게까지 심하지는 않습니다. 급여의 차이와 밖에서 사는 고충 등을 잘 타협해서 결정해야겠지요.

영상 잘 보고 갑니다~ 한 가지 궁금한게 있는데, 기장님들은 한 기종의 비행기에 배정이 되시면 바뀔 때까지는 계속 동일한 기종만 운항하시는 건가요?

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

고맙습니다 ☺️ 대형사처럼 기종이 많은 곳에선 소형기는 통상 2-3년, 대형기로 오면 그곳에서 특별한 일 없는한 계속 타게됩니다.

항공기 이런건 관심 없는데 캡틴님 영어 쓰는거 보고 공부하러 옵니다.ㅎㅎ 저도 영어 잘하고 싶어요~ 근데 유학 갔다 오셨거나 외국에서 살다 오신건가요?

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

아 ㅎㅎㅎ 항공기도 관심 갖어 주세요^^ 저는 아직도 공부가 많이 필요한 완전 토종입니다 ㅜㅜ 함께 원어민 비스무리 해질 때까지 공부해요 😊😊

👍👍👍 Well done, most informativ and a fair comparison between both types of airplanes.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Thank you 👍🏻🥰

I fly an A320. I do agree it would be beneficial to know the other pilot’s side stick position, such as during the ground control check or on takeoff roll. Aside from this mild inconvenience, I absolutely love the aircraft. It is a pleasure to fly, and it is very comfortable. My company bought some 737 Max. Most of our pilots do not want to fly on them.

@captainjksaviationlife248

4 ай бұрын

Hi~ I 100% agree to your comment.. even I am now flying B787, I miss A330 😊

@CarlosAlexandre-fl2ut

3 ай бұрын

Nothing better than hearing this from a pilot. Thanks.

@cosmicdebris2223

3 ай бұрын

I can imagine, and I refuse to fly in a 737 max!!

@rael5469

3 ай бұрын

" it would be beneficial to know the other pilot’s side stick position, such as during the ground control check or on takeoff roll." If the other pilot is moving the stick you would hear "DUAL INPUT."

@rael5469

3 ай бұрын

@@cosmicdebris2223 Other aircraft had teething issues. Inexcusable? Of course. But for instance the DC-10 went on to have a long and profitable career.

The ‘On-Off’ toggle switches are typical of US standard. In Europe it’s the opposite as standard. It’s confusing as I live on both sides of the pond.

Very good, calm, informative and without too many ads. Does what is says on the tin!

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Thank you!! 😊

You were very fair and professional and cited fascinating sublties of differences The only airbus difference I don't like is the joystick. But now, I see the comfort of a n Airbus pilot tray table! Instead of a yoke.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Thank you so much! I didn't like the sidestick either at first.. but once I got used to it, it was super nice to use~

I thought the difference is Boeing is dangerous and airbus is safe 😂

@captainjksaviationlife248

4 ай бұрын

Hello, sadly.. feel like that's becoming the truth 😅

@rugger1009

4 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 - that’s a ridiculous assertion.

@da480

3 ай бұрын

Couldn’t have said it any better 🤣🤣🤣🙏🏻

@Westexec

3 ай бұрын

You should remember that both manufacturers use outsourcing for their aircraft and a lot of the fuselages are made in the same factory so it’s only a matter of time before an airbus has a similar problem

@peterbohren3637

3 ай бұрын

It‘s only true if you misbehave. All airlines aak you to keep your seatbelt fastened during the flight. So nothing to worry about if the occasional door disappears.

Kudos for having been able to succinctly express the main differences in philosophy, with few examples, instead of details overload. Actually as a once frequent traveller I can cabinwise relate to that, maybe the differences were even more pronounced in these days. The old Boeing feeling (707, 727, 737, 747): Solid, conservative, trustworthy, no-frills, with a touch of wagon (727, 737) or clipper (707, 747). As opposed to Airbus (A 300, A310, A320): Cool, French, sophisticated, but somehow impersonal, even boring. BTW: DC-8, DC-9, DC-10 were all likable, yet somehow odd. And the L-1011 felt like an interesting standalone.

기장님 존경합니다 여쭤보고싶은게 있습니다 비행기도 자동차처럼 기종마다 힘과 디자인이 다르다고 들었습니다 이에따른 조종감의 차이가 있나요 ?

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

안녕하세요^^ 네 맞아요.. 꽤 다릅니다. 엔진의 힘도 다른 게 느껴지고, 같은 기종이라도 엔진의 제작사가 어디냐에 따라서 그 출력의 느낌도 다릅니다. 조종감 역시 달라서, 자동차 취향차가 있는 것 처럼.. 조종사분들도 그런 취향차가 어느 정도 있답니다..

AIRBUS is the second aircraft manufacturer in the world now? I thought it's BOEING

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

The purpose of this video was to let people know the difference between two from a pilot's point of view.. so I had never researched the data like how many planes they sell.. You're right! Now I know sales volume of Airbus has been more than Boeing for the last 5years..

@ludovic7439

2 ай бұрын

Airbus....Is nomber one...

Thanks for the video. This is about a topic I wanted to know about since a long time 😊

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Hello and.. thank you so much!! 😘

Nice work! I'm a new hired at AAL. Very excited for the future & opportunity. I currently fly a Falcon 2000 made by the French.. I've to pick between the 737 & A320 in class, I'm definitely leaning towards the airbus. Some similarities with the Falcon 2000, clean & simple.

@captainjksaviationlife248

4 ай бұрын

Good to have you here and thanks for comment! Though I'm currently flying 787, I also lean towards the airbus cause it's simple and easy like you said. Hope you keep up good work and good luck on your choice and your future! 😄

@jcheck6

2 ай бұрын

No comparison, go Airbus...larger cockpit and much quietier.

@charlesjay8818

2 ай бұрын

Go Airbus, with such a backlog of A320 family..... you will have a job for life & won't suffer the embarrasment of saying your a Boeing pilot

기장님 질문 하나 해도 괜찮을까요? 비행기도 파일럿 관점에서 기종에 따라 성능이 확실하게 구분이 가나요? 차로 비유하자면 예를들어 슌간토크, 가속력, 롤링, 부드러움 안락함 등등요 ㅎ

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

네 기종마다 엔진반응이나 속도, 기타 느낌은 꽤 다릅니다.

@user-hl9mu3cf5t

7 ай бұрын

​@@captainjksaviationlife248답변 감사합니다 😅

@remighesquiere384

3 ай бұрын

😂

굉장히 직관적이고 실무자 관점에서 깔끔하게 설명해주셨네요. 잘보고 갑니다!

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

오 😍 고맙습니다!!

Im retired Captain (United, Western and Aerolineas Argentinas), i´m flew with MD10, DC-10 and B747, Boeing 727 and Douglas DC9, almost all time with B747 and DC10 and i prefer Boeing.... definitvely and positive! Best regards Capt.

@captainjksaviationlife248

4 ай бұрын

Wow.. you're a lot senior to me, sir!! Thanks for comment 😊

@FeedBackMain

4 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 Thank you so much Captain, i wish all the best in your career and absolutely much success for you. I miss so much the yoke and friendly chats with partners, long time flying, my Queen of Skies and much things more, but that´s it, time is over. Best regards captain. Hugs.

I have been trained and flew all the McDonald-Douglas DC 8-series aircraft. My favorite was, and still is the DC 8-63. I also know Boeing & Airbus as a consultant.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Wow.. that's a brilliant career!

Really interesting perspective. First time I've seen this. Thank you!

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much~ 😉

기장님 나중에 시간되시면 RR엔진과 CFM엔지 PW엔지 비교도 해주셔요 3 spool RR과 2 Spool GE CFM엔진 비행하실때의 차이. 그리고 PW Geared Fan 엔진의 Wide Body기 적용 여부가 궁금합니다

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

넵 잘 알겠습니다!~

Very informative and honest video. Really great job. Thanks

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

Thank you very much for great comment! 😊

잘 봤습니다 선배님^^ 다른 영상에서 911이전부터 파일럿이셨다고 해서 아버지세대 영어발음 하실거라고 생각했는데... 대단하십니다 ㅎㅎ 동네에서 비행할때 ㅇㅇ approach(사는 곳 공개될까봐 가렸습니다) 주파수 들으면 원어민 아니라면 대형기 모는데도 정말 저걸 영어라고 하는건가... 싶은 기장들도 많던데요... 유튜브 하시는 계기도 그렇고 이미 기장이신데도 더 발전을 위해 노력하시는 것이 존경스럽습니다. 영상 고맙습니다.

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

좋게 봐 주시는 거 같아요 ㅎㅎ 영어는 옛날부터 새해가 되면 늘 결심해오던 그런 거였는데.. 작년이 되서야 다시 공부해보자 하고 시작했습니다. 요즘은 비행도 많고, 편집하느라 ㅎㅎ 공부를 거의.. 그래도 아직 꿈은 "원어민 처럼" 입니다. 죽기 전에 꿈을 이룰지는 모르지만요^^ 암튼 너무 감사합니다~

해당 영상 주제와는 맞지 않는 질문일수도 있으나 갑자기 궁금증이 생기는 점이 있습니다. 대한항공이 아시아나와 합병승인을 위해 대한항공이 운용하던 B787-9 일부를 에어프레미아로 이관할 계획인데 아시겠지만 대한항공 B787-9 은 GE엔진이 장착되어있고 에어프레미아의 B787-9은 롤스로이스 엔진이 장착되어있습니다. 만일 대한항공에서 이관된 B787-9의 GE엔진을 RR엔진으로 변경하지 않고 에어프레미아에 그대로 도입할수도 있을것 같은데 궁금한점은 같은기종이라해도 장착된 엔진의 제작사가 다르다면 조종특성이 다를 가능성이 존재할까요? 혹은 조종사보다는 정비사에 맞는 주제일지도 모르겠지만 만일 가능하시다면 항공기 엔진 제조사들에 대해 다뤄주셔도 좋을것 같다고 생각이 듭니다.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

항공기 엔진은 특성이 꽤 다릅니다. 특히나 롤스로이스 엔진의 경우에 내부 터빈 로터가 3개 있는 구조로 다른 엔진들과 다르죠. 연비나 기타 효율이 좋다고는 하는 데 솔직히 몸으로 느끼지는 못했습니다. 다만 바로 느껴지는 건 파워를 증가시켰을 때 반응하는 속도, 스풀업 타임이라고 하는데 그게 조금 깁니다. 제가 예전 중국 가기 전에 대한항공에서 A330을 오래 탔었는데 엔진이 PW사 꺼였어요. N1, N2 이렇게 로터가 두개 있었던.. 그런데 이직했던 하이난항공의 330은 모두 롤스로이스 엔진이 장착되어 있었고 초기 적응하는 데 조금 시간이 필요했습니다. 그때는 어차피 다른 회사로 옮겨서 꼭 받아야 하는 교육이라 그랬는데.. 만일 787 GE 엔진이 장착된 비행기가 들어온다면 글쎄요.. 아마도 간단한 지상 교육 같은 걸로 진행되지 않을까 하고 개인적으로 생각해 봅니다. 모르죠^^ 들어와봐야 정확한 건 😊

@churu_addicted

3 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 궁금증이 시원하게 해소되었습니다. 감사합니다!

기장님 동영상 잘보았습니다. 궁금한점이있는데 330대비 787은 오토메이션이 비슷할정도로 많이 발전해있나요?

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

330보다 거의 10년 가까이 뒤에 개발된 787이니 오토메이션은 꽤나 진보되어 있습니다. 영상에서도 언급드렸지만 보잉의 보수적인 컨셉으로 인해 일부러 하지 않는 그런 것들도 꽤 많구요.

재밌는 영상 만들어주셔서 감사합니다 :) short haul 에서는 B737로 여러 이착륙을 하며 비행재미를, long haul 에서는 a330 으로 운항의 편한함을 즐기는게 베스트 이겠군요!

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

고맙습니다 😊 차처럼 바로 바꿔 탈수 있다면 그게 최선의 선택이겠네요^^

Really good video, thank you ! As a sidenote, Airbus named FADEC and not EEC as FADEC can interface with different type of engine that use different controls. CFM and CFM neo using ECU and IAE, PW and PW Neo using EEC. They have different interface with the system in the plane and different datas are collected, thus having an "umbrella" name to cover both types of system.

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

Hello, hi.. thank you so much for comment. It's been years since I left 330, my memory is a bit rusty about the relationship between those systems. And I appreciate you letting me know about neo ones as well. Hope you keep me in the loop so I can hold the bridge to Airbus 😄

@theacechip

3 ай бұрын

Also, Boeing calls EICAS what Airbus calls ECAM.

@rael5469

2 ай бұрын

No, on the A320 it's EEC. From the V2500 IAE literature; "The V2500 uses full authority digital engine control. The FADEC comprises; 1) Sensor Inputs. 2) Data Inputs. 3) The Electronic Engine Control Unit. (EEC) The heart of the FADEC is the Electronic Engine Control. (EEC)

@martinchab1

2 ай бұрын

@rael5469 and the CFM56-A specification tells you "The FADEC system consists of : -an Engine Control Unit (ECU) containing two identical computers, designated channel A and channel B. The ECU electronically performs engine control calculations and monitors the engine's condition. -a Hydro-Mechanical Unit (HMU), which converts electrical signals from the ECU into hydraulic pressures to drive the engine's valves and actuators. -peripheral components such as valves, actuators and sensors used for control and monitoring." The A320 CEO version comes with 3 engine options, CFM56-A (ECU), PW6000 (EEC) and only for the A318 the IAE V2500 (EEC) For the NEO variant only 2 engines option exist, the LEAP-1A (ECU) and the PW1000G (EEC) So the CFM FADEC uses the ECU technology and the PW/IAE the EEC technology

@rael5469

2 ай бұрын

@@martinchab1 "So the CFM FADEC uses the ECU technology and the PW/IAE the EEC technology" Right.....why are you telling me this? All I was saying is that on most A320 it's EEC. The FADEC is the whole system. The engine control is the EEC, not FADEC. For instance, I would never get a task to "replace the FADEC." It would be to replace the EEC. Even in your example it is the ECU and not the FADEC.

They are both fantastic and needed. The real problem is that we Must have more profits and a diverse workforce.

안녕하세요. 궁금한 게 있는데, 저 아는 기장님은 승객으로 탈 때도 보잉은 안 탄다고 말하시던데 에어버스가 더 안전하다는 인식이 있는건가요?

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

아 그렇지는 않습니다^^ 둘 다 매우 안전한 비행기이지만 조종사의 입장에서 볼 때 취향차가 좀 있는 편일 뿐입니다 😊

Great perspective and thank you for sharing your thoughts. Best regards

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for your comment! It means a lot to me 🥰

영상 잘 봤습니다! 320에서 막 737로 트렌지션한 경우라 같은 엔진이라도 737이 콧핏 소음이 조금더 있는 편이더군요! 럭셔리한 애어버스가 그리울데도 있지만 메뉴얼 비행+베테랑 기장님이 비행하는걸 직접 조종간으로 보고 느낄 수 있는점은 좋네요!

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

장단점이 너무 분명한 두 기종이죠. 737도 사실 800/900 밖에 타 보질 못했는데, 그 이전 버전들은 조종성도 아주 좋았다고 하더라구요. 보면 아무래도 본인이 많이 탔었던 기종을 선호하는 경향이 있더라구요.

구독하게 된 계기였던 영상이네요 😍 제댓글이 너무 성의가 없어서 댓글 다시 달아요 😊 제가 좋아하는 항공기는 A380하고 B777 인데요 기장님깨서 이야기하신것처럼 장단점이 있다고 생각해요 그래도 저는 에어버스 손! 그런데 영상에 나온 330처럼 737도 측면 선바이저가 동일한데 787 선바이저는 충격이에요😢

@captainjksaviationlife248

4 ай бұрын

777 팬이 많으시네요.. 저는 아무래도 330을 오래 탔었기 때문에, 제일 애착이 가는 듯 해요. 그걸 배제하고라도 787을 3년 째 타고 있지만 아직 보잉에 적응이 잘 안된다는 ㅎㅎ 썬바이저는 진짜 ㅠㅠ 안습 그 자체입니다.. 보잉 괘씸한...

The biggest difference has to be the yoke vs. side stick. Yoke is placed on the center line of the pilot's body which is ideal for hand eye coordination while the side stick can force captains to use the left hand which for 7 out 8 people is the off hand and therefore less coordinated hand.

@A321LR

7 күн бұрын

Actually all Captains sitting in the left seat regardless (yoke or side stick) will fly with the left hand on the yoke and right hand on the thrust levers. As a pilot I have spent 12 years in the right seat with yokes, 12 years in the left seat with yokes and the last 4 years in the left seat with a side stick. After 16 years flying around with my left hand as a right handed person, I prefer left seat with a side stick. You get used flying from both seats very early in your career.

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 күн бұрын

I can't agree more to your comment!! 😉

기장님 한국은 왜 조종실내 계기판 영상 촬영이 안되는걸까요? 뭐 중요한 보안 사항이 있어서 그런걸까요? 그리고 또 궁금한건 항공사에서 근무하다가 기종변경은 조종사의지와는 상관없이 회사에서 일방적으로 통보하고 이루어지나요? 손에익은 기종조종하다가 다른기종으로 바뀌면 훈련하는데만 6개월걸리고 다시 매뉴얼 공부하고 시물레이션 훈련받고 스트레스 받을것 같습니다

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

그러게요 ㅠㅠ 분단의 이유이겠죠.. 저도 도통 이해가 안되는 일입니다. 고정식 카메라로 찍는 조종실 밖 영상도 회사가 허락을 해줘야 가능한데, 회사에서 안된다고 해서.. 보여드리고 싶은 이착륙 영상을 못 찍네요... 암튼 영상 구상하다 보면 안되는 게 많아 아쉬움이 너무 많습니다 🙄😷 기종 전환은 회사의 필요에 의해 하게 되죠. 특별한 이유가 있지 않으면 대개 전환 교육을 받아야 하구요. 잘 아시네요.. 보통 6-7개월이 소요되지요 ㅠㅠ

@jbs7946

8 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 해당 기종이 퇴역 하거나, 회사에서 매각해 버리면, 조종사 또는 정비사 입장에서는 어쩔 수 없죠... 기종전환 하기 싫다?고, 이직 (본인이 익숙한 기종 운용하는 회사)하는 것도 쉽게 결정할 일이 아니고...

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

@@jbs7946 대한항공이나 아시아나처럼 기종이 많은 회사는 필요에 따라.. 또 소형기 부기장 - 대형기 부기장 - 소형기 기장 - 대형기 기장의 순으로 전환을 보통하는지라, 기종이 없어지거나 하지 않아도 보통 3-4번은 교육에 들어가죠

@user-bz1lz7ql1w

7 ай бұрын

현재 항공정비학과 재학생인데 항공법규를 공부하며 저도 궁금해서 찾아보니, 항공보안법에 칵핏 촬영 금지가 적혀있는 것은 아니지만 보안법을 토대로 만들어진 항공사 내부 규정에서 보안(분단이라는 특수상황과 보수적인 항공법 등등..의 이유)로 제한하더라구요. 보안이라 해봐야 이미 유튜브에 칵핏이라던지 혹은 시뮬레이터 등을 통해 많이 알려진 부분이기도 하고.. 별 의미는 없지만 말입니다.

@user-ws1vh2pk4g

7 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 분단하고 비행기 조종실하고 무슨 연관이 있을까요??😦😦

안녕하세요! 현재 미국에서 객실 승무원인 20대 남잔데요.. 나중엔 조종사가 되고 싶습니다. 혹시 현실적으로 조종사가 될 수 있는 조언들이 있을까요?

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

일단 최근 동영상 중에서 조종사 되는 과정과 자격 등 영상을 한번 천천히 보시길 추천드립니다. 짧게 댓글로 드리는 것보다 심도있게 생각하실 수 있도록 영상으로 많은 부분 말씀을 드렸으니 보시고 의문이 드는 부분이 있으시면 댓글로 한번 더 문의 주세요~

Great video, I was wondering about the differences from a pilot's perspective for a long time.

@captainjksaviationlife248

Ай бұрын

Thank you so much for your comment! 😉

기장님 영어쓰시는거 들으니까 카리스마가 엄청나신거 같아요 ㅋㅋ 멋지십니다

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

안녕하세요^^ 카리스마까지 ㅎㅎ 감사합니다 🤩

Airbus joystick should have some visual indicator sowing the alignment of the other joystick.

@captainjksaviationlife248

4 ай бұрын

That's another smart idea!!

@ross9581

3 ай бұрын

I think there is a signal or some device to indicate which joystick is in use or maybe it came after 447. I also read that when the two joystick are use simultaneously they are disengage??

@rael5469

3 ай бұрын

@@ross9581 If both pilots try to use their "Side Stick" at the same time a synthetic voice announces "DUAL INPUT !" Plus either pilot can take control of the side stick by holding the autopilot disconnect button in which case the aircraft will announce "PRIORITY LEFT" OR "PRIORITY RIGHT."

@rael5469

3 ай бұрын

@@ross9581 " I also read that when the two joystick are use simultaneously they are disengage??" Actually, if both pilots use their side stick the fly by wire system will calculate the combined input. It will sum the two inputs or subtract if they go in opposite directions. I think that way an instructor can safely add inputs to a student's inputs. But yeah, both side sticks will work at the same time unless one pilot uses the "side stick priority" function. We test the side stick priority function from time to time. It is a scheduled maintenance task.

@ross9581

3 ай бұрын

@@rael5469 Thanks mate

에어버스는 독3세단 보잉은 포드픽업 이정도 비유면 적절한 건가요? 😊

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

넵 ㅎㅎ 그런 비스무리한 느낌입니다 😄

As an European I keep my fingers crossed for both Airbus and Boeing. However the quality issues concerning Boeing models seem to be bothering. Hope it will be overcome soon.

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Hello~ thank you for your comment! I also hope they could transform everything to overcome..

좋은 영상 감사합니다. 혹시 기종별 파일럿 급여에도 차이가 있을까요?

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

안녕하세요, 기종별로도 차이가 있습니다. 소형기, 대형기의 비행 수당 단가가 우선 다르구요, 각종 수당이 많은데.. 같은 대형기라도 어디를 얼마나 다녔느냐에 따라 꽤 차이가 납니다. 예전 회사에서 A330, B777 모두 대형기로 분류가 되어 있었지만 급여 차이가 꽤 났었어요.

@governor_check

8 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 확실히 둘다 비행해 보셔서 자세히 아시는군요! 어떤 대형기가 급여가 더 높나요? 보잉일거라 추측해봅니다만....

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

@@governor_check 대형기라도 장거리의 범위가 다릅니다. A330은 미서부, 유럽, 대양주가 가능하고 B777, 787이나 747, A350, 380 같은 기종들은 미동부까지도 커버가 되죠. 그래서 당연히 급여는 더 멀리 가는 얘들이 연장 수당이라는 것이 더 많아서 급여가 더 높습니다.

@user-gy6gz5ex4b

7 ай бұрын

저도 수당이 궁금하네요ㅎㅎ 협동체 조종사들은 착륙수당을 받는다던데 장거리 수당보다는 조금 덜 받는건가요?

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

@@user-gy6gz5ex4b 안녕하세요, 그 수당은 꼭 어떤 게 많다라고 말할 수는 없어요. 소형기 조종사도 국내선에 한해 이착륙 수당이 나오고 국제선을 나가면 그 부분은 해외 체제비로 받습니다. 때론 소형기의 이착륙 수당이 많을 때가 있고.. 때론 대형기의 체제비가 많을 때도 있습니다. 즉 큰 차이는 아니라는 거죠 🙂

꽤 다양한 다른점이 있네요!! 이런 이유 때문에 파일럿 분들이 에어버스나 보잉 둘중 거의 한쪽으로만 라이센스를 따시는 경우가 많을것 같아요 저도 들은 이야기인데 영상에서 비교해주신것처럼 어느분께서 보잉은 지프차고 에어버스는 세단이란 말이 생각나네요 하지만 파일럿을 꿈꾸는 학생으로서 비행기 발전이 조금만 느려졌으면 하네요 앞으로 멀었지만 파일럿이라는 직업이 사라질수도 있을것 같아서😂😂 오늘도 유익한 영상 감사드립니다

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

기종을 내가 고를 수 있는 환경은 별로 없지만, 할 수 있으면 건너 다니지 않는 게 좋죠. 보통 때는 아무런 문제가 없지만 갑작스레 뭔가 생기면 예전 습관(?)이 나오더라구요. 스위치 위치 반대인 것 때문에 한번 실수해서 교육 때 교관한테 혼나기도 했고 ㅎㅎ 보잉, 역시 미쿡차 맞습니다^^ 오토파일럿 영상에서도 말씀드렸지만, 아직 해결해야 할 과제가 너무 많아서 제 생각에 조종사가 없어지려면 최소 수십년은 필요하지 않을까 싶습니다. 걱정 마세요 😊

@Aviator._.

8 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 답변 감사드립니다 저는 라이센스 취득할때 회사에서 한 회사로만 몰아서 취득시켜주는줄 알았는데 보잉 에어버스 둘다 취득하는 경우도 있는군요!!

A320 B777 지금은 B738 기장인데 에어버스 그립습니다.. ㅠㅠ 첫 기종이라 그런지 애정이 더 가네요😂 에프 건승 기원합니다!! 기장님 너무 동안이세요!

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

에어버스가 주는 뭔가가 있지요^^ 잘 아시겠지만.. 동안은..... 후보정의 기술입니다 😊😊 암튼 감사합니다!!~

기장님 너무 유익한 정보 재미있게 잘 봤습니다~! 787썬바이저 펼치는 과정에서 기장님 near hit by sunvisor 재미있었네요 ㅋㅋ 장거리 비행에서 칵핏 공간이 너무 훌륭해 보입니다

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

감사합니다 ㅎㅎ 그러게요 얼굴 기스날 뻔^^ 😄

어.. 에어버스 항공기 소개할때 A310은 안나오는데요.. A300이랑 똑같아서 안넣은건가요?

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

네 ㅎㅎ 종류가 많다보니 다 나열하면 좀 정신없을 듯 해서 같은 시리즈는 하나로 묶어 소개드렸어요. A310은 A300의 파생모델이거든요^^

보잉 이슈에 대해서 영상 다루어주실수 있으실까요?

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

넵.. 한번 다룰 예정입니다~

I’m team Yoke. Not a fan of the joystick. But as a passenger honestly doesn’t matter which plane it is to me. I’ll ride both.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

The yoke always gives us more direct and raw feelings of flying.. As a passenger, I do not have any preferences either

@SimRacingVeteran

3 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 - yeah I would imagine so. The side stick just feels wrong. But you probably just adapt as a pilot. I’m just a Microsoft Flight Sim enthusiast. So my opinion doesn’t hold much weight. 🤙

Since the McDonnell Douglas merger, Boeing builds aircraft with cost reduction a higher priority than safety (often with Airline encouragement). Airbus builds with safety a higher priority. Boeings 737 alone has more crashes than all Airbus crashes combined. Which would you choose?

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

You're absolutely right!!

being right handed I also prefer to use a joystick in my right hand. I'd be uncomfortable sitting on the left in an airbus being forced to use my left hand to control the joystick especially given the responsibility. However, I still much prefer Airbus overall as a passenger and refuse to fly on 737 MAX aircraft. The thrown together compromise with software dealing with extreme design changes of the engine locations I find irresponsible (as we saw with the two fatal crashes before the "workaround" modifications and re-certification).

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Hello!! Every pilot struggles to get used to the left seat during thier captain training and so did I.. 😊 I believed that lots of people dispointed at Boeing's behavior regarding 737-MAX I hope they would show us complete overhaul this time

Well, Captain JK, I think you gave just about as diplomatic an answer as you could choosing between Boeing and Airbus. As a passenger, I would lean towards Airbus being the better choice as well, but always lurking in the background is the AF 447 incident, and the MCAS issues that gave flyers pause. I'll have to go and check out your other videos, now. Thank you!

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

Hello, hi~ Thanks for comment.. but I guess you haven't go through to the end ☺ I recommend you to watch it again, at very end of it, you'll find me standing in the same side as you 😊

@nplus1watches35

7 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 Yes, I did watch it all the way to the end, where you cast your vote 6-4 leaning towards Airbus, and that's why I said that I leaned towards Airbus as well (as a passenger, since I'm not a pilot), but I guess my point was that both manufacturers have had issues that have caused planes to crash so that's probably the perspective that I view things from. If I a pilot, though, I think I would rather fly a Boeing with a column than an Airbus with a joystick. I think every commercial pilot should have manual control to fly a plane (like a Cessna, as you say), rather than trust a computer/AI to make decisions for the pilot. The last thing I want as a passenger is to have a pilot in the cockpit who doesn't have the means to fly a plane at a very basic level.

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

@@nplus1watches35 Your comment means a lot to me, thanks. As a pilot, why I lean a bit towards Airbus is not because they can cover me in the case that I make mistakes but because it's way more stable while flying manually. As I showed you in the video, it's not easy to see what the other pilot's doing with the side stick in the Airbus. But digging into AF447, even the brand new F/O made critical mistake, the other F/O could have overriden the control. (There's a red OVERRIDE button, when it's pushed.. the other pilot cannot control the plane) I "guess" both pilots at the moment were not able to recognize what was exactly happening, and the captain came back to the cockpit way too late. As nothing is perfect, everything has its own flaws. So do Boeing and Airbus... I don't know which one is safer from a passenger's point of view but as you said.. All the pilots are to be able to control the plane under whatever conditions... Thanks again for good comment and We'll try!!

@miks564

4 ай бұрын

Just wanted to add that the AF447 incident happened because the computers totally left the flying to the crew. It wasn’t automation, it was the lack of it. And MCAS is not automation. It’s a sad Boeing example of implementing shortcuts. Can you believe the Max aircraft is newer than the 787? It’s like both were made by different manufactures. Consider MCAS wasn’t needed for the Max to be a good aircraft. MCAS was needed to mimic previous gen and avoid the need for new type rating for 737 pilots. …and finally because MCAS was implemented without redundancy, using only one computer and one AoA sensor without clearly explaining its function to the crews.

@herceg6772

4 ай бұрын

@@miks564AF447 was so messed after the pitot tubes froze. From these everything was a mess. Computers did their job as they should but the pilots didn’t hear the stall warning due to stress. At last computer gave up.

No way you used the missing ping sound from league of legends. I see a man of culture right here.

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Haha 😄 now I know what you guys are talking about.. The missing ping sound. Though I've never played lol but the sound is one of my favorite ones 😆

장거리는 미주(호놀룰루, LA) 두 번 타 보았는데 승객인 저의 입장에서는 B777이 정말 좋았습니다. 그 큰 덩어리가 엔진 돌리자마자 달려나가 한 20초 만에 떠오르는데.. 소형 기체만 타다 큰 기체 처음 타 봤는데 많이 놀랐습니다!ㅎㅎ

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

저는 안타봤지만 정말 좋은 비행기라고 해요 777...

처음에 말한 최첨단자율주행전기차를 선택하느냐 전통적인스포츠카를 선택하느냐의 취향차이인듯 합니다. 그냥 자동차를 이동수단으로만 보고 편안하게 갈려면 자율주행차를 달리면서 느낄수 있는 스릴과 손맛을 느낄려면 스포츠카를 선택하듯이 그냥 편안하게 장시간 가고싶어 하시는 조종사분들은 에어버스를 선호하고 직접 거대한 비행기를 몰면서 짜릿한 이착륙의 손맛을 느껴보고자 하는 조종사분들은 보잉을 선택하지 않을까 싶네요. 그러나, 여객기는 어디까지나 대중교통이고 조종사분들은 직업으로 하시는 분들이시기에 조종 편의를 더 많이 제공하는 에어버스를 많이 선호하실듯 합니다. 여객기는 스포츠카처럼 개인취향으로 타는 자가용이 아니니까요.

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

안녕하세요^^ 사실 테슬라, 포르쉐 정도의 차이까지는 아니지만 일반인 관점의 이해를 돕고자 그렇게 비교를 해 봤습니다. 그러나 여전히 보잉과 에어버스는 추구하는 방향성이 다소 뚜렷해서 말씀하신대로 조종사간 호불호도 꽤 나뉘는 편입니다.

전통은 그 나름의 멋이 있는 법이지요. 제 성격 자체가 좀 보수적이라 보잉쪽에 마음이 가다가도 실제 조종사분들의 마음을 생각하면 에어버스에 끌리는 건 어쩔 수 없는 것 같네요ㅋㅋㅋ

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

조종사들도 확실하게 파가 갈리는 듯 해요 ㅎㅎ 제 경우도 에어버스를 좀 더 오래 탔었기 때문이 아닌가 싶기도 합니다.

I'm also for Airbus. As a passenger, I prefer the cabin door next to me to open only when an embarkation finger or ladder is firmly adhering to the exterior surface of the fuselage. But that's only my personal taste, I'll give you that. 😅

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Hi~ 😉 Good to have you here! and thank you so much for watching and commenting~

@cxar71

3 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 Thank you, JK. Very good content! 👍

It's also nice that Airbus doesn't kill their whistle blowers.

이렇게 자세한 양사 비교는 본적이 없는 것 같습니다. 제대로 된 정보와 팁 감사합니다.

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

극찬을 해 주시다니 너무 감사합니다! 😊

Thanks for Sharing

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

Thanks for coming and comment 😄

Dieser Luftfahrtkanal Video ist der beste 👍👌💪👏💯 für mich. Sehr Gut, Erklärt in allen Belangen der Unterschied zwischen Boeing und Airbus 👍👌 Danke 🙏💐🇩🇪

@captainjksaviationlife248

15 күн бұрын

I used to speak a bit of German when I was in high school.. But it was.. too long ago 😄 Wow.. thank you so much for saying that!! Vielen Dank für Ihren Besuch! 😊👍🏻

I used to fly with only one airline (I'm based in Asia), the flag carrier where I lived. It happened to be one of the most successful airlines in the world in terms of profit; professionalism of cabin crew AND safety record. Now, ever since Boeing's repeated fiascos, ranging from its B737 accidents to its management's inability to up the quality of their manufacturing ending in their CEO's resignation (yet again!), I've decided to pick my flights not based on airline but based on the make of the plane being flown for my sector - I will pick the airline that happens to fly an Airbus for the sector I fly. NO MORE BOEINGS FOR ME!

@captainjksaviationlife248

Ай бұрын

It is another smart way for travel to choose "Type of aircraft".

기장님 궁금해서 여쭈는데 답변 해주시면 감사하겠습니다 비행기가 이륙 할때 조명을 왜 파란색 으로 박꾸나요?

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

음.. 어떤 조명을 말씀 하시는 걸까요? 파란 조명으로 바꾸는 건 없는 듯 한데요 🙄

@akey-243

8 ай бұрын

아 죄송합니다 이륙 하기 전에 밝았다가 어두워 지더라고요

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

@@akey-243 아^^ 그건 야간 이륙 시에 혹시 모를 이륙 중단 사고 때 승객들이 빨리 야간 시야에 적응해서 안전하게 탈출하는 데 도움을 주기 위함입니다. 죄송하시다니요 별 말씀을요 ☺ 궁금한 거 있으시면 언제든 댓글 달아주세요~ 제가 아는 한 성의껏 답변 드리겠습니다! 😉

Thank you very much for information🙏🙏🙏👍👍👍

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

Thanks! I wonder..... sorry, there's a friend of mine in Thailand who looks like you. Sawasdi krap 😄

Airbus: Switch up = on. Like a light switch what people use often every day. Makes sense to me.

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Hi~ 😊 Yes! Absolutely.. Up should be ON 😉 But as far as I can tell, Boeing's odd switching "Down/ON" comes from "overhead panel" (ceiling) When a pilot look up on the overhead panel, the directions of switches were more like "Forward and Backward" rather than "Up and Down"... Boeing finally ended up putting them as "Forward=ON" To match the flow of switching, all the other toggle switches were to be put "Down-ON" config.. Still strange but I guess it makes a bit sense to me though~

A330과 350타고있는 에어버스맨인데, 공감가는것고 있고 아닌것도 있네요. 에어버스도 파킹브레이크시 페달 풀로 밟고 돌립니다. 뗄떼도 풀로 밟은 상태에서 파킹브레이크 풀고요. ㅎㅎ 스위치방향은 회사마다 커스텀 가능한데 위 아래 온오프를 바꿔서 할수도 있어서, 저희 회사는 반대로 주문했네요. 그래서 330심탈때 항공기와는 스위치 반대여서 헷갈리던 기억이 나네요

@captainjksaviationlife248

6 ай бұрын

반갑습니다 기장님^^ 스위치가 옵션이었군요. 제가 330을 탔던 국내 k사와 중국항공사는 모두 보잉과 반대였어요. 절차적으로도 움직이는 상태에서 세울때는 페달브레이크를 밟아 세우고 파킹브레이크를 돌렸지만, 서있는 상태에서 파킹브레이크는 그냥 돌려도 되는 절차에 제한은 없었어요. 이렇게 항공사마다 같은 기종이라도 다른 점이 꽤 많다는 것도 조종사인 저도 신기하네요^^ 댓글 감사드리고, 가끔 이야기 들려주시면 감사하겠습니다 😄

YP 기장님들은 주로 영어가 유창하신 것 같아서 승객으로 탔을 때 더 안정감이 드는 것 같아요. FO 신입분들이 많으신데 10000시간 넘는 기장님들이 많은 가르침 주실 것 같네요. 유익한 비디오 감사합니다.

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

좋게 봐주셔서 고맙습니다. 전체 숫자는 많지 않지만 경험 풍부한 기장님들이 대부분이라 후배 양성에도 좋은 밑거름이 될거라 생각합니다 😊

@Hey-gh1cu

7 ай бұрын

yp가 에어프레미아인가요?

The real difference; Airbus doesn't fall apart. Boeings do! I don't want to fly on a Boeing!

@devilsadvocate2548

2 ай бұрын

Whilst not defending Boeing's less that stellar record, especially of late, are you implying there have been no instances where an Airbus has had parts fall off of them? For starters, America West Airlines Flight 2747 (A320) says hello!

To an aircraft maintenance engineer; Boeing = a Volkswagen beetle and Airbus=a Mercedes Benz.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Hahaha 😆 it's so interesting

@leotek..

2 ай бұрын

there is nothing american on a beetle. - how about boeing = buick and airbus = audi?

@lastmanstanding9389

2 ай бұрын

@@leotek..I 'm referring to the technological and quality difference, have you ever worked these planes, I Have.

Airbus is now the largest manufacturer of Airplanes in the world since a long time ago.... As a French and European citizen, I'm proud of the quality of Airplanes that our industry in capable of producing.

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Hello 😊 Yes, you're right! but.. Please read the comment that I have left and pinned at the top~ Have a great day 👍🏻😉

Thank you, Captain, for explaining the differences between the 2 leading aeroplane manufacturers. I have a student pilot licence and your point on the joystick vs. the yolk catches my attention. With the yolk aelerone control, both the port and stern yolks respond simultaneously as the pilot inputs their controls and you can visibly see it. On the other hand, with the joystick controls, it seems that there is no way of telling who is taking control of the aircraft without a loud and clear communications. That leaves a grey area of concern as the risks of conflicting control command inputs into the aircraft exist, and is an area where Airbus needs to work on, as there is no way of telling which pilot is having control inputs, which can be disastrous, as you pointed out.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Hello.. You're on a training stage to go to airlines.. Keep up hard work! yes.. Airbus's sidestick system is super comfy and stable.. I personally think that the point we're talking about should be clearly solved

좋은 영상 잘 감상했습니다. 기장님

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

좋은 댓글 감사드립니다!! 😃😄

Sound quite even to me except for the Flightstick. I really really would want Force Feedback to get a feeling on stress that is put on the plane. And of course immediately sense that the other pilot also tries to control the plane and there is conflicting input.

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

I guess Airbus will do something about it sooner or later.. They've been aware of that for quite a long time.

지나가다 우연히 보게되었습니다. 아시아나 14년차 747카고fo 후배 인사드립니다! 저는 320=>772=>747 조종하고 있지만 보잉의 매력에 빠지게 된게 미국에서 747교육받을때 교관님이 하셨던 말때문이었습니다. "에어버스는 컴퓨터를 믿지만, 보잉은 조종사를 믿는다." 저 말 하나로 힘들지만 자부심을 가지고 비행을 하고있으며, 사이드스틱으로 조종을하다가 요크로 처음 조종했을때 동체의 묵직함및 거동이 느껴져서 깜짝놀랐던 기억이 있습니다ㅎㅎ 영상 재밋게 잘 보았고, 자주 놀러오겠습니다~ 즐비안비하십시오/^^

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

안녕하세요 반갑습니다 후배님 ㅎㅎ 이렇게 얘기해도 되나요 😊 맞습니다 두 군데 철학이 확실이 다른 거 같아요. 보잉이 때로는 너무 심하게 보수적인거 아닌가 라는 생각도 들지만, 말씀하신대로 나름의 고집과 철학이 주는 묵직함이 매력인 거 같습니다. 늘 안전 비행하시고.. 경력을 보니 업그레이드 하실 때가 다가오는 듯 한데.. 좋은 결과 있으시길 바라고, 가끔 댓글로 소통하시죠 반가웠습니다!!~

From your very interesting prospect Mr Captain, as a non pilot I would definitely prefer to fly Airbus

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

That makes two of us!! 😊 As I said, I've been leaning a bit into Airbus..

The only difference that matters to me as a passanger: Only one of them DELIBERATELY produce faulty models that simply fall apart in the air just out of pure greed.

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Agreed, sir 😏

너무 학구적이고 재미있어요! 영상보고 지난주 탔던 비행기 기종 찾아보게 되었네요 :) A330 & B737! 전에 A380 탈때 이층버스라고 해서 그냥 슈퍼 비행기라 애칭인줄 알았는데 에어버스에서 만들어 그렇네요. 스피킹 실력 👍👍👍 세요. 듣기평가 하듯이 엄청 집중해서 들었습니다. Thank you!

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

안녕하세요 반갑습니다! 학구적인데 재미있다고 하시니 학구파신가 봅니다 😊 와 비행기 자주 타시네요. 380은 슈퍼로 불리는 게 맞아요^^ 조종사들이 관제사와 교신할 때 타고 있는 기종에 대해 언급해야 하는 때가 있는데 그때 A380과 B747-8 이 두 기종은 호출부호 뒤에 "Super" 를 붙이게 되어 있거든요. 스피킹은... 꾸준히 해야 하는데, 비행 많고 편집하느라 ㅜㅜ 암튼 좋은 댓글 고맙습니다 😉

보잉은 throttle, 에어버스는 thrust lever라고 부르는 이유가 궁금했는데 이 영상을 보니 각 회사의 철학이 담긴 명칭이라는 생각이 드네요. 저는 밥을 편하게 먹는 것이 가장 중요해서 제가 조종사 입장이라면 에어버스를 택할것 같아요 ㅎ

@captainjksaviationlife248

8 ай бұрын

엄청 중요합니다 밥먹는 거 ㅎㅎ 보잉에서 밥 먹는 건 ㅠㅠ 너무 없어보여요^^ 각각의 장단점이 분명하지만 저는 쪼오금 에어버스쪽 선호가 맞는 거 같아요~

와 밥상 없는건 상상도 싫네요 787은 있을줄 알았는데 혹시 있나요? 아무튼 한쪽기종만 타거나 비행입문하는 사람들 대상으로 너무 유익한영상 감사합니다

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

787도 물론 밥상은 없습니다. 자존심 대결의 문제로 아마 보잉이 기존 조종간을 포기하지 않을 것이므로, 향후로도 그걸 없애고 에어버스와 같은 밥상을 설치할 확률은 없을 것 같아요 😊

the dual input happen on a boeing aircraft too... But i agree it's more obvious even if in high stress situation it happen. The system decouple the yokes and take an average if conflicting force exceed a force limit.

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Make some sense...!

Very good video and a fair answer. I’m a lifelong Boeing guy from a Boeing family but even I can see where Airbus is passing Boeing. Their Top management seems more focused on the diversity of Boeing’s workforce than providing what customers want. And they tease with some new aircraft they might launch next decade while waiting for the technology. Winners and leaders MAKE the technology happen not wait for someone else to develop it. Elon Musk is a great example if that.

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

Hello, hi... I have lots of Boeing guys around me but they just keep saying that Boeing is always top.. without even considering how Airbus has been doing. You're the first Boeing man I've ever seen.. who has completely different opinion in mind. and the last sentence.. that's really awesome one, may I quote that sometimes? 😄 thank you so much for good comment.. Have a great day!!

@Crazyuncle1

7 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 Thank you for your nice reply, Captain and of course you can quote anything I wrote to you no charge, hahaha. Keep up the great videos and happy landings to you and your crews. P. S. My Korean wife says…..안녕히 계세요

@Daneelro

4 ай бұрын

Um. The problem with Boeing's management is not bothering about diversity (that's some blatant misdirection you must have heard from some conservative anti-diversity propagandists) but focusing on short-term financial gain. Boeing started to go downhill after the merger with McDonnell Douglas that resulted in the takeover of the latter's corporate culture. Moving headquarters as far away from the factories as possible sent a quite clear message as to management's view of the actual engineering & manufacture. But the real blows came in the form of outsourcing (subsidiaries independent of Boeing in name only are meant to shift manufacture to non-union plants while spreading responsibility). Things got even worse when development itself was made subservient to the goal of short-term financial gain: the root cause of the B737-MAX debacle was the aim to avoid certification as an entirely new type, so engineers had to fit the significantly larger new engine on a basic airflame too low for those engines to fit under the wings, leading to balance problems, leading to the stopgap solution of MCAS. I must note that the diversity misdirection is especially weird when made in the context of the Boeing losing the battle against Airbus. Diversity is pretty fundamental to Airbus's corporate culture, it being founded as a merger of several companies from different nations, and it had to merge not just different company cultures (like Boeing-MD) but engineer teams speaking different languages and following some very different engineering philosophies (say German vs French); but, in the end, this diversity turned out to be a positive rather than a negative. I'm also sorry that you still think Elon Musk is some positive example. The guy is the most successful con-man in history, and he is doing the same irresponsible things Boeing managements of the past 20 years did, only he was brazen enough to get away with the consequences, so far. Whether it's accidents with the non-full-self-driving-Full-Self-Driving, serial violations of his FAA permit for Boca Chika, or the lies he told to get government subsidies, or having the worst labour relations and workplace accidents record of any major company, or all the scammy announcements only meant to boost the stock price but then never fulfilled; Boeing managers only dream of that level of crookedness.

@Crazyuncle1

4 ай бұрын

@@Daneelro Um. You’re wrong. I know Boeing from the inside. And top management is quite proud of their efforts to display and promote their diverse work force. Another case of affirmative action raising its ugly head.

@Daneelro

4 ай бұрын

@@Crazyuncle1 Oh, so you're not just a naive repeater of propaganda, you're fully behind opposing diversity, despite your Korean wife. Figures. Of course, it fails to compute for you that top management being proud of displaying and promote their diverse work force *in no way contradicts* anything I said. I said diversity is a good thing, as proven by Airbus's success, & irrelevant to Boeing's three-decades-long management problems. None of it is the fault of affirmative action. You have to have a certain kind of giant bias to not see that.

기술적으로 봤을때는 에어버스가 기술적으로 상업적으로 진보한 비행기라 생각됨 1. Cockpit commonality A320 A330 A340 심지어 그 이후에 나온 A380 A350.. 비슷한 Layout을 가지고 있고, 조종사들의 기종전환이 보잉보다 쉬움 2.Fly by wire System. 에어버스가 A320 처음 여객기에 도입한 이후로 처음에는 조종사들이 익숙하지 못하여 사고도 많이 났지만 (Air France 시범비행 사고 AIr India 추락사고) 불행하지만 사고이후 Back Data가 싸여서 Fly by wire System자체의 완성도가 높아져 있음. 보잉은 B777부터 시작하여 B787 정도가 Fly by wire이고 심지어 B737 MAX에도 적용하지 않았음. US airways 허드슨강 사고를 보더라도. 비상시에 Fly by wire가 얼마나 조종사에게 대처할수 있는 시간을 줄수 있다는것을 알수 있음 매뉴얼이라도 에어버스는 기본적으로 컴퓨터가 개입을 하는 구조 3.결 A320의 도입 초반부 Fly by wire에 익숙하지 않은 조종사의 사고가 많았음 현재는 Airbus자체가 사고사례를 기반으로 꾸준하게 Fail Safe로 Fly by wire가 진보되고 있음 보잉보다 Fly by wire에 대한 Back Data가 더 많은것을 봤을때.. 그리고 Fly by wire자체가 이제 Standard로 잡혀져 있는것을 볼때 향후 보잉의 왕좌는 쉽게 지켜지지 않을것이라 보임

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

와.. 저보다 오히려 더 잘아시는것 같습니다. 존경스럽네요.

Thank you, captain, for enlightening us .

@captainjksaviationlife248

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for watching and commenting!!

I heard from the pilots in my company(SQ), they said they prefer Airbus more!! Haha 😂

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

Hello 😄 when I was in China, I had some friends from SQ A330. they might have said that. Though I can't recall their names but I miss them all~ Thanks for comment!!

영어 진짜 잘하시고 멋지네요❤

@captainjksaviationlife248

7 ай бұрын

아 ㅎ 감사해요 😄

Hello may i ask you whats the song in your intro at 0:31? Greetings

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

Hi.. thanks for watching my video.. I made that intro video using a free video in "placeit.net" I tried to find the one you are after but I couldn't find it 😥 It was almost 2years ago.. If you really like to find it, I believe you'll find it somewhere in the website. I chose the one in "KZread video" section. Sorry for not giving you the answer you want to hear..

@Stefan-dg9cv

2 ай бұрын

@@captainjksaviationlife248 so the song was part of a template? ok no worries :)

@captainjksaviationlife248

2 ай бұрын

@@Stefan-dg9cvYes, but they provide the title and the artist of the song contained in the video.. and you can listen to it if you like