This guy is a cutting edge dude

Favorite KO’s of all time. 1. Holly holm head kicking Ronda rousy 2. Ngannou uppercutting overeem’s head into orbit. 3. Dr. Meyer dismantling Dr. peter Ward.

@benjiedrollinger990

Жыл бұрын

You forgot the rope a dope. Ali KOs Foreman 😂🎉😂

Fantastic as always Dr. Meyer.

Oh yes! Ive been waiting for soo long for another talk from you. You sir have opened my eyes.

And thank you Dr Meyer for sharing this important presentation with us.

Keep doing what you're doing, I believe in your work.

Excellent!

This was awesome. Thank you. I've been listening to you for almost 10 years now. I appreciate you.

Stephen, I love listening to your talks. You have been blessed with an wonderful (non-evolved) mind.

When I first heard of I.D., I thought it was like a band-aid to bridge the gap between newly discovered facts about biology and theism. A sort of "meeting halfway" between science and religion. If I didn't believe in the importance of what a belief system means to me, I wouldn't be concerned enough to find the TRUTH. It appears that macro evolution and descent with modification make me feel like something is missing in the story of how this Universe was created to beget humans. Thank you for this talk. I am currently in a state where I want there to be peace in my world and in the world around me. Christians tend to say that this world is ruled by evil forces, and I am faithful to the TRUTH, hoping beyond hope that things will work out. There is definitely a spiritual battle going on in many guises on this planet at the moment. I will do my best to reconcile TRUTH with FAITH.

Big fan of Stephen Meyer!

Awesome. I've been waiting for some new Meyer! Meyer reminds me that I just can't muster enough faith and imagination to believe in random, spontaneous, biological and astronomical fine tuning needed for this amazing world of life.

So good to hear from you. Dr. Meyer. Thank you for sharing.

Thank you, Dr. Meyer for the talks you have posted here on KZread.

Keep going you're on the right bath May God Almighty be with you and guide you along your path! Big fan.

This man deserves to win a Nobel Prize... Why hasn't anyone discovered him? Is there something wrong with him?

wow i just found out about stephen and his theories, and he suddenly uploads his first 2 videos in 2 years, nice! i really believe that darwinists are a type of cult from my research. for someone who has studies the patterns of religions they rely on the classic micromanaging information that people have access to, but it is on a much larger scale, so more similar to a totalitarian state. this is why i am not just questioning the argument of materialism, but now i have serious doubts about the reliability of the fossil record, and a young earth may indeed be consistent with real science.

Glad to see you back in action!!!

This was a very good talk. Although I was expecting more information based more on the whole spectrum of the sciences, and not just the one presented here on Darwin's Theory pf natural selection.

Get the pleasure to meet Dr. Meyer in the JRE but joe keep trying to discredited his work and his faith, it was so frustrating, glad the I find this here... Thank you doctor.

love & respect from Bangladesh

i really salute this person.....HIGH RESPECT.....all praise be to GOD the most high the most Merciful

I have begun to have serious doubts about the existence of extra-terrestrial life. I think our purpose as humans is to be the ones who explore the universe & to colonize other worlds. Hundreds or thousands of years from now, we may even be able to terraform planets. By that time, maybe Darwinists will have figured out they were wrong.

@sanjosemike3137

Жыл бұрын

Most Neo-Darwinists don't realize that Darwin himself was very conflicted by the fossil record of the explosion of new body structures, that seemingly occurred precipitously without any precursors. Darwin just "assumed" that the fossil evidence would eventually be discovered. Well, THAT did not happen, and that "conflict" just continues to get worse. Stephen Jay Gould, a committed Darwinist just "renamed" the problem: "Punctuated equilibrium." It was just a rename. He STILL had no fossil evidence. Neo-Darwinism is under attack by committed evolutionists. However, you and I do not HEAR this, because of their "fear" of Intelligent Design entering the lexicon. Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)

Wow! Thank you!

Please add consciousness in to the explanations.

Brilliant mind, convincing theory.

23:51 Fine tuning of the universe

This guy knows what he's talking about. He doesn't have to descend to the mud-throwing level of most of the dogmatic scientists in the modern era. The hi-jacking of science by the new atheists is symptomatic of a much wider societal problem.

This looks like an old video. Say, 2014?

Walter Bryant

Actually, via machine learning and AI, critics will refute you by stating that unintelligent machines and programs CAN code and even "learn." However, intelligence created those unintelligent systems. Thought it was worth pointing this out

@Boris82

Жыл бұрын

Like you point out yourself already (as the machine was created by intelligence) there will be no refuting on that point.

@habeebijaz5907

Жыл бұрын

AI do not learn patterns from the data in a magical way. You have to define a cost function. Adjusting the form of cost function is actually fine tuning the machine; there exist no single cost function that can solve the problem before hand. Even in machine learning there is a lot of human effort involved. The machine is just doing calculus, minimizing the error. Picking the best cost function that minimizes the training error doesn't guarantee that it performs well on the test set. You have to revise your model many times. This is nothing but training the machine. It can not learn on its own.

@Kramartie4491

Жыл бұрын

Self refutation Loren.

For some reason I can’t view the 19 comments here.

5-year-old material? Where's the new stuff?

All theories require some amount of faith to get from A to B, including Darwinism. (In reply to the statement he makes @54:10)

Discovery Institute has spent decades trying to come up with a way to detect design. The problem is that you cannot prove design because, in essence, they are trying to prove god. The intelligent designer is god. Therefore ID is and will always be religion. God is not falsifiable.

A lot of beating around the bush to prove intelligent design. Why not just read the scripture verse that says Christ created all things viable and invisible. Colossians 1:16 "For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:" King James Bible

@coachmarc2002

5 жыл бұрын

What would that do for people who don't believe the bible?

@jayc222

5 жыл бұрын

Because many of us want to know the nuts and bolts of creation. We’re not satisfied with, “Let there be light” and then there was light. Some of us are curious about the entire process. It leads to improved understanding of the world around us and technological advancement that lengthens and enhances the human existence.

It all depends on the defenition of information. Barren moons that have never been seen or visited have a lot of information, no man or mind created that, just processes of the impacts.

@jamgrl38

5 жыл бұрын

Huh? Information only has one definition and it can only be formulated by a mind.

@cecildison6788

5 жыл бұрын

You didn’t listen to the video did you. How about listening before you comment

@thetruthchannel349

4 жыл бұрын

Sikor - That is completely non-sequitor and non-analogous to the kind of information being discussed here. You are stretching the definition of information in order to create a chaotic ambiguous application. Thats dishonest.

Mr. Meyer seems like a perfectly pleasant fellow, but his approach to biology strikes me as highly problematic. From the sense of biological science itself, there are a range of issues with some of the analogies that he draws, in addition to other arguments. From the sense of biology as a community of researchers, the notion of some contentious debate racking the halls of academia strikes me as a bit exotic

I love your work and support ID in fact I taught it in my biology class. However, I wish you would look into Cavendish experiment. Try and determine what is his cause and effect is. You will realize that it does not adhere to scientific method and is pseudoscience. Also explain how the earth can have an atmosphere with pressure next to the vacuum of space? I know your not arguing this line of science. but you use the absurd argument that the laws and constants of physics make life possible. I would argue its the dome.

Ordered design does not, (or does not necessarily) equate to "intelligent design". Out of infinite possible outcomes, chaos will inevitably produce any and indeed all, coherent design to which intelligence can be either inferred or attributed.

@coachmarc2002

5 жыл бұрын

That's simply an unsubstantiated assertion. Obvious design requires a designer. That's what we know from experience. What is your evidence that the opposite is true?

@morellecummins7419

5 жыл бұрын

Andew Tarjanyi There is no existing infinite from which chaos can create all possible outcomes. Indeed, there is only a singular outcome.