Dr. Meyer is in a league of his own. I haven't read his latest book, but Signature in the Cell was amazing. I was an atheist who believed in Darwinian Evolution until I went to college and took a lot off various biology classes. Microbiology was the clincher. I don't see how anyone who truly understands biology at that level can not see the obvious design. I don't know if my professors would be happy or appalled that they lead me away from blindly believing in something I was ignorant of to accepting intelligent design and eventually Jesus.

@TrevoltIV

6 күн бұрын

Amen brother I have a similar story.

Stephen Meyer is a true inspiration and God is blessing his work. He has had to fight for a long time to gain a foothold, but now the world is taking notice. Great work, sir!

Newton wrote, "a little knowledge leads away from God, but much knowledge leads towards Him".

@moses777exodus

2 жыл бұрын

*_“The more I study science, the more I believe in God.”_* --- Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955), founder of modern physics (Theory of Relativity inter alia) and 1921 Nobel prize winner

@onethdasanayake3689

2 жыл бұрын

That's Luis Pasteur I think

@jarrygarry5316

2 жыл бұрын

Darwin is not an atheist.He is a deist and believe god as first cause.Majority of scientist use his theory to be an atheist

@bossybuddha

10 ай бұрын

"A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion." --Sir Francis Bacon

It's really evil that kids in public schools don't get to hear this side of origin of life.

@jonhiggins2012

2 жыл бұрын

@@logicalatheist1065 You are literally teenage atheist incarnate. I guarantee you go around telling people your IQ is 140. We both know you don't hold a PHD and Dr. Meyer brings up criticisms that are, at the very least, worth noting. It's so painful seeing you guys shill for your religion harder than any Christian, cuz I used to think like you. Wake up, dude. Get off reddit

@stevendapra9465

Жыл бұрын

It's not evil, it's censorship.

@stevent8314

Жыл бұрын

@@stevendapra9465 - It’s both evil & censorship. They are not mutually exclusive things.

@RUMPLEforeskin25

9 ай бұрын

This would generate critical thinking. That doesn’t help us dumb down America.

@carlant_III

6 ай бұрын

the atheist religion has won the schools unfortunately

I happen to stumble across this. Listening it now for the 4th time.

@glenc5185

8 ай бұрын

Yeah it needs a few listenings to catch everything...

"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.." Romans 1:22-28 suits well with the Atheist Scientist.

I love those who vehemently oppose Meyer, Tour and Behe and the cadre of SERIOUS scientists who KNOW that scientific materialism has major holes in its bucket that cannot be plugged. A serious logical premise that "what is most probable as we look at the facts?". Intelligent design is our best conclusion. As we go along, if proof of Macro Evolution appears, I will dismantle my prejudice at this point towards a supreme intelligence that created it all. That really is the corner that atheists and Darwinian militants hate to be painted into......after they admit multiverses, eternal matter cannot answer the question "where did all the information come from that began it?".

Instead of focusing the camera on Stephen's face, stay switched on the slides! Killed the whole presentation by omitting the slides.

Meyer is so good at explaining complex issues to the common man.

@rac7773

4 ай бұрын

That is his forte. You always get the gist of what he is saying.

Signature in the Cell is the most fascinating thing I have seen in all my 58 years. "There are no weaknesses in the theory of evolution"...Eugenie Scott. The "theory" is a hypothesis and it is weaker than a cooked noodle!

@TrevoltIV

6 күн бұрын

I wouldn't call it a hypothesis but yes it's definitely a failed theory.

I'm not even Christian, but I have a lot of respect and the original teaching(unedited versions)/correct interpretations(of current edited texts) are very deep with wisdom, truth, and I believe, most probably correct historical account(s). I have watched this countless times and other videos and after the current book I'm reading, will read Darwin's doubt and buy his new book when it comes out in 2020. It sounds legit and from what I see, when he goes toe to toe with atheists, they never are able to dismantle his arguments. Until I check the sources given in Darwin's Doubt, these debates, his talks, his support from other scientists give me great confidence in what he's saying. I hope he's right and if he is, I hope he really gains momentum helps change science.

I always like listening to Dr Meyer. Always learn something new. Ty.

The consensus in the scientific community is that " Intelligent Design is not science and has no place in a science curriculum. " Is just Creationism by another name.

I'm a layman when it comes to biology, but even I can understand that any mutation has to be sudden, complete, and functional in order to be favored by natural selection. Otherwise it will be lost within a couple of generations.

I like the Charles Marshall circular reasoning and evasion : 1. largely emerged : requires a motive force which in turn assumes something which generates that force 2. through the rewiring of the : requires an action of rewiring, which assumes an actor who performs the action 3. of the gene regulatory networks : requires the prior existence of a functioning regulatory network 4. of already existing genes : requires the prior existence of genes So the new phyla emerged by the action of an unexplained force, acting in a rational fashion in the framework of existing networks on prior materials. What is never explained where the materials, the force, the plan of action, the intelligent actors and the goal came from. Let me guess : from the multiverses and quantum fluctuations, right ?

@stevendavis8636

8 ай бұрын

Goodsarcasm

It’s interesting how evolutionists utilize identical insult tactics of neo-marxists against anyone who disagrees with their world view and Darwinist dogma

@SuperKoMa-gir8L

Ай бұрын

Because they come from the same source.

@TrevoltIV

6 күн бұрын

Because the prerequisite of neo-marxism is neo-darwinism.

Interesting to note that Darwin, in principle, today would not be a Darwinist.

Drop the mic Stephen, drop the mic. Excellent presentation.

I’m a Muslim, and I always was brainwashed to think that we evolved and I knew it contradicts my religion and I wanted to learn more about Darwin’s theory, and I just picked up your book. You seem like an inspirational person

@mousasaab2652

Жыл бұрын

I’m a Muslim as well and felt the exact same way. Im majoring in biology and understood the mechanisms of evolution, my professor in high school would slander religion all the time and kept copies of Richard Dawkins books in his bio class (I have no idea why). Was the real atheist type. The rest of my professors are great, but just push the biology textbook that species evolved and became more complex etc… I never truly believed it. Some of it made total sense for sure, like Darwin’s Finches. Or maybe human races (there’s hadith and Quran verses about Nabi Adam’s descendants separating and occupying different lands). On the other hand it doesn’t explain new biological systems? Biochemistry? Photosynthesis? I look at quantum mechanics and it’s beautiful. I came to the conclusion that beauty is truth, truth is beautiful, and that ultimately leads to God. Every time you marvel at something in the universe you are marveling God’s creation and it’s a form of worship. I also thought about the life of The Prophet (pbuh), all previous prophets, and the prophets family. The deep introspection in the past almost always concluded that there should be a Creator. This is explained beautifully by the story of Nabi Ibrahim, or Ahl-Kufah. They independently came to the conclusion that there should be a God. There are so many other things I’d love to mention, like how the Quran said that there was a time when the Earth was bombarded by fiery rocks and brought us water and metal (I’m not sure if this is mentioned in the Bible), but I definitely should read the Quran more.

@anglaislangletaire2098

Жыл бұрын

Imagine that you are a muslim and that this ideas have sneeked in your mind and that you live in a thirld world country how will you combat dout .You are fortunate to live near great universities.

@noorzanayasmin7806

Жыл бұрын

@@anglaislangletaire2098 I live in the USA and I still cant voice it to my family.

@noorzanayasmin7806

Жыл бұрын

@@mousasaab2652 I am a muslim born family myself. I came to the conclusion that beauty is perfection. Perfection is truth. The closer you are to perfection, then you are to truth and then god itself. The reason we worship beauty is because we perceive beauty as being awe, perfection.

@lauriebenson5720

7 ай бұрын

I was raised not knowing God .... but always knew there was a God and the universe was alive

I love listening to Dr. Stephen Meyer. Such a fine writer, thinker, and presenter.

Too many slides missed, but anyways this video presentation is amazing. Thank you for that!

This man should be speaking to Coliseums...not just churches. He destroyed the myths that prevail in Darwinism and naturalism.

@chomnansaedan4788

3 ай бұрын

The dogma of Darwinism is stronger than the American flag, the church, etc. It can ONLY be presented in a church because almost no other place would accept it.

I admire you and your work, Stephen. Thank you. Greetings from Argentina.

Sorry, I don't mean to beat a dead horse, but you could probably still add the slides as this great video and will be watched many times in the future.

Great presentation. The one thing I've always wondered is how any life form can have a self-preservation instinct. Today's most educated scientists/engineers haven't got a clue how to produce a a self-preservation software subroutine that is common with most forms of life.

@pichytechno6782

8 ай бұрын

This self-preservation presents in itself another problem for evolution, if life has a self-preservation instinct, how is it possible that one life can evolve into another if this mechanism limits the destruction of the entire form of life?

Mind blowing. May God bless Dr. Meyer.

"Darwin hoped" is not scientific.

Stephen Meyer does a Great presentation Darwin’s Doubt. Pity that Darwin’s studies did understand intelligence and information, but he could not add to evolution theory or it would cast Doubt in his theory. So, this pass and just now many evolutionists are questioning the foundations of evolution wish is downhill now days.

So the Pokémon model of evolution is the most realistic one?

I thoroughly appreciate the Discovery Institute reclaiming this topic for _science_ and rejecting the _religion_ of evolution.

Excellent presentation! Too bad Dr. Meyer didn't go in depth in to "Irreducible complexity" as well. That with complete viewing of the slides at all time as well would have made this a 10/10.

I’m going to need to listen to this about 3 times for my small brain to suck it all in.

exciting and revolutionary

I have an analogy that I believe illustrates Dr. Meyer’s point a little better than his computer slide and more common to laymen. We want to build a new car. Do we start by working out the details of the types of bolts and metal we use, or do we create a concept? We must first determine what we are trying to achieve, before we worry about what the upholstery or engine will be. Do you want a SUV or a sports car? A bolt, is just like one protein in an animal. It may be used many times, but it is highly complex. The threads, how it engages the metal, how it handles vibration and how it handles corrosion are just some of the properties it needs to be successful. Who believes if you develop a new bolt, that you are on your way to a new vehicle type? Who would drive a car if you found out the bolts were designed randomly? Do you believe by rearranging just a few bolts randomly that a compact car becomes a truck? The design comes first, then the details. Why we can debate who the designer is, I don’t believe can argue the logic.

Wonderful info as always...just wondering if it would not take away from his presentation to show the slides a few seconds more--we can still hear his voice while looking at the slides ;-)

The mind is like a parachute. It only works if it's open.

Great work. Also a scientific theist myself. Would like to discuss plasma cosmology and discoveries by Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock. Thank you for the work.

Ok, I realize that this is not scientific, but I really enjoy listening to Steven Meyer. He has a manner of speech and a way of explaining things such that those of us that are educated in things other than biology can understand.

@carlant_III

6 ай бұрын

what do you mean by "not scientific"

@petesimpson8545

2 ай бұрын

He’s incredibly articulate

@petesimpson8545

2 ай бұрын

Although he’s got a goofy haircut

23:40 I've long wondered about the transition from single-celled organism to multi-celled organism with differentiated, dependent cells that all share a universal DNA (meaning *EVER* cell has the DNA for the entire *ORGANISM.*

If you like this Man I would suggest ,that you listen To James Tour on you tube. He puts the nail in the coffin.

Anyone else a little weirded out by the fact that the 4 amino acids correspond perfectly with YHVH? And all of the derivations thereof? And the whole universe being constructed by that word? Oh boy.

I love Meyer's work

Meyer and James Tour need to both be on Joe Rogan......millions of people need to hear the truth they are sharing.

thank you Dr. Meyer for putting the theory of intelligent design on sure footing once again.

Awesome presentation. Clear, cogent and intensely interesting.

Brilliant that explains a lot especially the end product.

Very well explained. Thank you

Fascinating!

I love this guy! I wish he was my professor!

when Stephen talked about "non-gradual modes of transitions" it is the biggest piece of evidence in my opinion. I cannot believe that fish could turn into monkeys, nor that dinosaurs can into birds. so many lacking fossils and no precursors for most animals.

I think God would have made us to be able to do small changes based on the environment that we live. Like why people in hot and cold climates change slightly over time to adapt to those environments.

Brilliant mind.

5:50 this is one of the things Lloyd Pye argued : can't explain the major innovations that occur. how was there a complex eye in the first animals?

20:25 ... 5 Years later ... One can not question Darwin nor government.

Excellent video Stephen Meyer

he is convincing

I like to recommend when someone is giving a lecture with slides. Please show the slide instead of the guy given the lecture. We can hear him just fine but we can't see the slide.

If there were no weaknesses in the theory of evolution, wouldn't that make it a fact? And since evolution is ONLY a theory, how is it that they teach it as a fact?

Good stuff. Thanks!

"Our uniform and repeated experience"...what I've been saying for years is: Intelligent Design is an axiom for the origin of complexity. Well done Dr. Meyer!

Dr. Meyer is a treasure and so underated in his field. He has strengthened my faith so much by proving how logically consistent it is to believe in God.

Fascinating stuff. Great to see a professional so enthusiastic about his work. Watched all the videos I could find, again (not a physics student, but very interested). More power to him. See him interviewed by Peter Robinson on "Uncommon Knowledge".

@gregyoungman

Жыл бұрын

i also watch this man’s videos, but I recommend the book “on the origin of species”, it’s a great book actually and it’s not physics!! Or chemistry!

Natural Selection was not even Darwin's idea. Lyle stole it from Wallace and gave it to Darwin and Wallace stole it from Patrick Matthews who published it in a horticulture magazine in 1831.

Luar biasa, saya sangat suka video ini ❤🇮🇩

I just got this book yesterday! Very excited to read it. I’ve added Some of your videos are on ithasbeenwritten.com also Great stuff!

This is probably the one time an atheist group would have open ears? 😂

Very interesting indeed but i would have liked to see all the slides as I was trying very hard to take notes! There's an awful lot to take in here - might need to view it some more!

This leads me to suppose that there is an internal pressure. Not a random reaction to events, but a coded response. Hmmmm.

How has he not been on Rogan yet??

Awesome!

To me the absence of evolutionary organisms in living things today would prove Darwinian theory incorrect.

@mrlakkie1612

2 жыл бұрын

Thats why its called a theory, it cant be proven without some serious leaps of faith.

@danishqureshi9350

Жыл бұрын

@@mrlakkie1612 it can't be proven because no one can literally go back in time and watch what was happened all we have is pure assumptions for satisfying human mind

@gregyoungman

Жыл бұрын

What are you guys talking about with a Petri dish, a microscope and some pond water you can absolutely see evolution. To the point where you can make predictions on outcomes for the colonies.

@danishqureshi9350

Жыл бұрын

@@gregyoungman false equilavence just because evolution happen in viruses it doesn't mean it will happen on humans

Why is it Lawrence K is unable to be open to these findings? Please go on the Joe Rogan show

Thank you for such a great presentation. I would hope the considering of the aging of the earth would now be scientifically investigated: If the earth was completely covered by water (occured with the great flood) would not the pressure of the water change the carbon dating of all? And is it not possible that if all the animals and plants were created (most at the same time) and then the water covering the entire earth, (with that the movement of the water during the flood and its gradual resendance, then this would effect the earth’s fossil sediment layers and where you would find the fossils?

@stevendavis8636

8 ай бұрын

No

이 영상에 모든 언어의 자막이 달리길 바랍니다

Nice to see someone like Steve pushing back the only way any of us move on is threw Christ I just can’t figure out why some of the smartest people in science can see creation of this whole planet n humans I have no education even I can see creation makes me scratch my head at least I know where me n my family are going when we pass on we were all saved together at one time what a blessing from god to know I’ll know my whole family for eternity

Well done Steve 👏👏👏

Be nice to see the slides

Thanks again.

I know its a dumb question. How does any of this matter when we see the finch variation. Is the process that differentiates finches not the same process that would allow macro evolution?

@ozowen

3 ай бұрын

It is. The claims currently in vogue with this lot (with no evidence) is that variation is entirely derived from extant dna and epigenetics. When pressed they can admit that beneficial mutations happen sometimes, then they tend to walk away from that at first opportunity.

A huge thank you Dr. Stephen from Brazil!!!

Here is why the bike-lock analogy isn’t the best analogy and actually gives favors to the evolutionary side of the argument. In that scenario, the thief won’t re-use previously used incorrect combinations because he has an intelligent mind. Nature doesn’t work that way. You would also have to factor in the likelihood that a previously used combination would re-emerge (unlikely, but just as unlikely that the correct combination would be found as well) with no limit as to how many times it can re-emerge. Imagine that after ever new try, the thief’s memory was wiped and he didn’t remember what combination he previously used.

This information should enter into the broad public sphere. This would have a major impact on the mental strongholds in people's minds, opening people up for the gospel. Genesis is key.

when a woman goes into labor she does not wait to see if a monkey will come out. Yehovah Tzeva'ot made man Adam in His image. Cat produces a cat, dog a dog, lemon tree a lemon. Practical logic.

Please edit this video to include a longer exposure of the slides. Too much focus on Dr. Meyer's face rather than the slides interferes with this presentation.

Dawkins must be hiding somewhere right now.

you need dna for life and life for dna. so scientists are pulling at their own bootstraps and expecting lift off. 👑 🤍 love, david

@schmetterling4477

10 ай бұрын

Why does one need DNA for life? ;-)

Thank You - Well Done !!!

Read his books to get the details. His presentation from a geological, physics and Christian background are a wonderful intersection pointing to God’s amazing creation. Genesis 1, Job 38, Romans 1.

Well, it’s certainly worth considering but I don’t know how you’d get funding for research on that

20 mins is pure gold

He is brilliantly fascinating!!!!!!!!!!!

Does Dr Meyer acknowledge the dramatic effects of a large flood? The millions of years paradigm, the geological column, the sudden explosion of different forms...it seems he is defending time to build the complexity of life similar to evolutionists - unless I’m totally missing something? He points to his work with a German scientist on 17 identified explosions of new life in the past. Is he just ending in mystery?

He should have dropped his little mic on the evolution theory when he was done.

wow

Please focus primarily on the slides Focus on thè speaker secondary

Dawkins LOL What a joke. He's a Popular science book "Rock Star" nothing more...

Meyer is brilliant! So many others like James Tour are excellent as well. Dawkins... not so much 😂

This guy looks like Saul Goodman

The second law of thermodynamics vs the creation of organic DNA information by undirected random processes. This spontaneous organic chemistry information probability problem shows how incredibly complex and difficult for organic molecules and DNA to occur by undirected random processes in our universe. For every chance for something to occur there is an equal and opposite chance for something to not occur unless there is an intelligent author? Right?

Random Mutation Selection....is not an Adequate Mechanism. This is something the Neo Darwinists have known but can't openingly admit because it is the foundation that Darwinism is built on.