Pet Peeves of the Battle of Gettysburg (Day 3) | Tim Smith

Ойын-сауық

In the finale of this miniseries, ACHS Historian Tim Smith debunks some common misconceptions about July 3, 1863, the third day of the battle.
Check out the first two episodes of Tim's Battle of Gettysburg Pet Peeves here:
Episode 1: July 1, 1863: • Historian's Pet Peeves...
Episode 2: July 2, 1863: • Pet Peeves of the Batt...

Пікірлер: 75

  • @shellysmith1037
    @shellysmith1037Ай бұрын

    I have had 17 LBG tours. It was my birthday present each year. A treat, and yes it is a treat. I have had many good guides, a couple duds. After watching this....I'd trade them all for one from LBG T Smith. As the vid progressed it was like a crescendo, yep, yep, agree AGREE and then he ends on a very high note. Meade never gets a lot of due credit. 100% agree on all Tims points. He, in my opinion, epitomizes Gburg studies in this era.

  • @DianeBianchi_MNStormSpotter
    @DianeBianchi_MNStormSpotter6 ай бұрын

    I was a tour guide at a historic site for many years and gave tours to thousands of school children and adults. The public in my opinion are generally uneducated to history, and have very little knowledge of it, so we as guides have to listen to their generalizations and comments, and gently but firmly with tact and our knowledge to educate said public on history. Loved it when I broke through their dusty brains and got an A HA moment! Great video addressing frustrations with the public.

  • @davidwilhelm3431
    @davidwilhelm34316 ай бұрын

    Another tremendous presentation and performance by Tim Smith. I love it when he gets fired up, particularly when discussing the grreat George Gordon Meade.

  • @JeffL-rj1xq
    @JeffL-rj1xq6 ай бұрын

    Love the Pet Peeves. Completely agree on the "50,000 Killed" That particular one drives me crazy. I think this comes from non-historian folks who vlog or blog about Gettysburg and they casually throw that remark out there not realizing the differentiation of casualties. And thank you for the proper recognition for George Gordon Meade for the Gettysburg victory and the Grant "rant" lol.

  • @DonAbrams-hq7ln

    @DonAbrams-hq7ln

    4 ай бұрын

    If say 10k total deaths occurred, What happened to the 40k others ,many wounded and pows went to Elmira or southern camps. Baggage trains and ambulances carried many away from field hospitals. We can account for this diaspora fortunately from the roll calls taken at the company level.

  • @kipbebout6539
    @kipbebout65396 ай бұрын

    Always enjoy watching Tim’s videos. It was refreshing to hear his praise of General Meade, he never gets the full credit for what he did those three days in July. 👍👍 Tim‼️

  • @johnzajac9849
    @johnzajac98496 ай бұрын

    Two months earlier at Chancellorsville, Slocum's 12th Corps men had good, fortification-building experience at Chancellorsville. (Ref. 'Slocum's Logs' and 'Slocum's Line'.) Our pet peeves: a. The underappreciation of the important effect on the fighting by the heavy smoke created by artillery and musketry on the battlefield. b. The unawareness that Lee maintained his army's position on Seminary Ridge on 4 July, waiting for the Union forces to counterattack.

  • @richardwalling845
    @richardwalling8456 ай бұрын

    Thanks for all you do, and to the staff of the Historical Society.

  • @terryeustice5399
    @terryeustice53996 ай бұрын

    Love your thoughts on July 3rds days battle. Agree with you about Culps Hill’s engagement. And Lee’s last gasp charge with Pickett’s. Into the Union center. Understand these pet peeve’s. Also about General Meade Being the victorious at Gettysburg. Thanks Tim ! 💯👍👊

  • @ThreeZeroOne
    @ThreeZeroOne3 ай бұрын

    Great talk, Mr. Smith! Especially loved the section on "Pickett's Charge" 😀. Lee said it himself: "Its all my fault". I'm not even in the same ballpark as you folks but these things are so darn irritating to me too. Not understanding casualty figures...so elementary. Anyway, way to go, fun to watch + listen. Thanks for all you (all) do!

  • @battack56
    @battack566 ай бұрын

    You never disappoint Tim!! Thank you for another great presentation! Ssssickles!!!! I’m always going to remember you from that!!

  • @vickistevens423
    @vickistevens4236 ай бұрын

    Another outstanding video, Tim. You are such a vast wealth of information, and a definite treasure to the town of Gettysburg. Love your perspectives. Your passion is so contagious and very much appreciated. I could listen to you talk all day about the battle. (Agreed that Gen. Meade is under-appreciated). Thank you for always going the extra mile to keep our Civil War/Gettysburg history alive. And Happy 60th Birthday.

  • @Mark-qq9cd
    @Mark-qq9cd4 ай бұрын

    Ah, some “lost cause” thinking being addressed properly. Very very good info Tim. Thank you.

  • @msspi764
    @msspi7646 ай бұрын

    This was really great. I agree with all of that. I'll offer one of my pet peeves. All the generals you listed were commanders in the East, primarily of the Army of the Potomac. For the most part the war in the west is ignored. But flags of truce flew above the Confederate works at Vicksburg about an hour before the Confederate charge on the US center started at Gettysburg. Within a week after that, before the Army of Northern Virginia crossed the Potomac River, the last Confederate fortification on the Mississippi surrendered and the eastern Confederacy was cut off from the supplies and materials available from the Trans Mississippi west. After that several US Corps were freed up to move east to Chattanooga, Atlanta, Savannah, and the Carolinas. From a larger perspective gaining control of the Mississippi was far more influential to the outcome of the war than Gettysburg. But that's what guides and historians are there for, to help people move beyond the legends and see the war and the events from a different perspective than they had before.

  • @DianeBianchi_MNStormSpotter

    @DianeBianchi_MNStormSpotter

    6 ай бұрын

    Yes, a pet peeve is how the western theatre is ignored.

  • @paulondra19
    @paulondra196 ай бұрын

    I can listen to Tim all day. Somebody commented "National Treasure" and I agree. Do we know what was Lee's orders for Stuart on Day 3? I live near Gettysburg and I agree a rear calvary assault on the Union line at Cemetery Ridge would not be geographically easy.

  • @K_Type

    @K_Type

    6 ай бұрын

    Perfectly said

  • @TimDavis-gr5jn

    @TimDavis-gr5jn

    6 ай бұрын

    Yep. National Treasures. Tim Smith and The Beach Boys.

  • @michellemurphy658

    @michellemurphy658

    6 ай бұрын

    Stuart woould have had to cut his way through whole divisions to get to the back of the ridge. Absolute nonsense.

  • @kevinlebaron3157

    @kevinlebaron3157

    6 ай бұрын

    I think the intent was for Stuart was just to disrupt the Union rear. That’s about it. Whatever they could accomplish was the ultimate goal.

  • @paulondra19

    @paulondra19

    6 ай бұрын

    Do we know what Lee's specific orders were to Stuart? That is my question. Was it one of those attack Meade's rear 'if practicable'' orders? @@kevinlebaron3157

  • @porteralexander8936
    @porteralexander89366 ай бұрын

    Tim is hands down the best Gettysburg historian

  • @dks13827
    @dks138272 ай бұрын

    Great job, Tim.

  • @150pilot
    @150pilot6 ай бұрын

    When did "Longstreet's Assault" become "Pickett's Charge"? Wonderful videos. Thank you for posting these!

  • @michaeldepaul7676
    @michaeldepaul76764 күн бұрын

    I have always admired George Gordon Meade. If his promotion to Army command wasn't exactly the same thing as a rookie fireman being tapped on the shoulder and told "Here, you, run this three alarm fire" it must have been nearly so.

  • @patriciaspadea2266
    @patriciaspadea22666 ай бұрын

    Can't get enough pet peeves. Tim makes me laugh😂😊

  • @K_Type
    @K_Type6 ай бұрын

    Is it weird that I go to sleep listening to Tim’s story telling each night

  • @robstevenson2729

    @robstevenson2729

    6 ай бұрын

    Maybe a little. Completely understandable, though!

  • @joycefranklin8981
    @joycefranklin89816 ай бұрын

    Tim, I agree with every point you made. I get especially upset when I hear complaints about Meade and his supposed inaction after the battle. We went to Gettysburg on our Honeymoon (1960). I hope to get there at least once more. Keep up the good work, I really enjoy your talks. I have visited there many times. Love history.

  • @Wdstroud
    @Wdstroud2 ай бұрын

    This was really great Tim. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and peeves.

  • @charliet1535
    @charliet15356 ай бұрын

    I was a bus driver on one of your tours.

  • @davidsleep9259
    @davidsleep92596 ай бұрын

    Outstanding presentation Tim, really absorbing. Would love to walk Pickett’s Charge fields with you next year on my annual trip to Gettysburg from across the pond! Happy 60th birthday by the way!

  • @davidsleep9259

    @davidsleep9259

    6 ай бұрын

    “Pickett’s Charge”!

  • @jhorrocks8108
    @jhorrocks81086 ай бұрын

    Mr. Smith is speaking HIS truth! Best vid on KZread this week.

  • @terrywallace5181
    @terrywallace518117 күн бұрын

    Good program.

  • @robstevenson2729
    @robstevenson27296 ай бұрын

    Excellent! Thanks, Tim!

  • @TermiteUSA
    @TermiteUSA6 ай бұрын

    Ghost tours are my main irk-ism. They detract from the understanding of how scary and horrible the war actually was.

  • @65U512
    @65U5126 ай бұрын

    Yes, Culp’s Hill has been long ignored.

  • @donb7113
    @donb711328 күн бұрын

    I had Truman as my guide. To me the romantic narrative that Gen. Armistead was so upset that Hancock had been wounded is interesting. One, they’re in battle, and I think Armistead would have been more concerned about the status of his troops, his own wounds, and the fact that their relationship is blown way out of proportion, especially with the movie Gettysburg. Meade was a solid commander, and there is a famous photograph of Grant and his staff, and in it Meade is pouring over a map.

  • @MickeyJWind
    @MickeyJWind6 ай бұрын

    Meade did pursue, was never fired, still commanded the AOP at war's end, granted he was no longer the grand strategist in 1864, but he still commanded the Army.

  • @jameslohman271
    @jameslohman2716 ай бұрын

    This is very good,

  • @mwdjr3158
    @mwdjr31586 ай бұрын

    Fantastic! Thanks

  • @haralabostsiaklides9143
    @haralabostsiaklides91436 ай бұрын

    Can you do a presentation on the third days battle at Culps hill? I'd be very interested in learning about it. I don't actually know if I've ever seen a video where they really talked about it in-depth. And to be honest I don't know if I've seen a video where they really get to in depth on the second days battle.

  • @michaelhoffman5348
    @michaelhoffman53486 ай бұрын

    Love your analysis that Meade did a good job at Gettysburg, but there is no way the Union fights the Overland Campaign if Grant wasn't there driving him from one battlefield to the next. The war could have easily gone on another year at the pace Meade would have liked to fight it.

  • @JohnLight1

    @JohnLight1

    6 ай бұрын

    Speculation

  • @dennismatthews7060
    @dennismatthews70606 ай бұрын

    What is the best source for information on the relationship between Meade and Grant during the Overland Campaign? Thanks for the video, Tim.

  • @GlennAnderson-nb1nk
    @GlennAnderson-nb1nk6 ай бұрын

    you are correct sir !

  • @Baseballnfj
    @Baseballnfj5 ай бұрын

    This is the kind of bitter, cynical, smart ass history snob content I'm lookong for. Thanks Tim! I'm being serious lol

  • @horizon42q
    @horizon42q6 ай бұрын

    I agree 100%. People just don’t know their history. Meade was a great general and leader. Ask Grant!!

  • @melissapollom427
    @melissapollom4274 ай бұрын

    The one I have always choked on is when someone says, "...if Stonewall was still alive the South would have won Gettysburg.. " I say Boulder dash!

  • @lendir1
    @lendir16 ай бұрын

    I don't always agree with Tim Smith, but he is right about Grant not taking control of the Army of the Potomac. As a matter of fact, he had been asked by Sherman to accompany him, as they had known each other for years.

  • @user-uy6jn9bs8u
    @user-uy6jn9bs8u6 ай бұрын

    The You Tube Channel "Jeffrey the Librarian" has a very good overview of the Battle for Culps Hill. His delivery is a bit dry, but I came away with a much better understanding of the vital importance and incredible fighting that happened there on all three days.

  • @karlking4980
    @karlking49806 ай бұрын

    Another excellent video! I am one of the few who, like the wounded General Hancock, believe that General Meade should have attacked immediately after "Pickett's Charge" had failed. Meade had a unique opportunity before him, but he was timid like almost all the union generals. Remember, Lee's army was also in disarray and greatly weakened from three days of combat. Wellington was not timid and attacked the French at Waterloo after Napoleon's "Picketts Charge" almost broke the outnumbered British line." And Wellington had a coalition army weakened by two major battles. Would Patton have sat back and played it safe? Would Jackson? You mention that most people do not know that General Meade commanded the Army of the Potomac until the end of the war. But you did not provide any examples of what military accomplishments General Meade actually had after Gettysburg. There is a reason General Grant gets the attention rather than General Meade. General Meade did a great job at Gettysburg, but he let an opportunity slip by. (Like General McClellan did at Antietam.)

  • @pizzafrenzyman
    @pizzafrenzyman6 ай бұрын

    The 50k KIA irks my ire as well.

  • @shiloh6519
    @shiloh65196 ай бұрын

    Meade didn't possess the urgency required to possibly crush Lee. Meade also dithered around for months afterwards. Meade was a good division or corps commander. Meade was not mentally equipped to be a Army commander like Grant or Lee.

  • @WilliamCurry-bh3dk
    @WilliamCurry-bh3dk4 ай бұрын

    how was cannons moved - also into position ???

  • @WilliamCurry-bh3dk
    @WilliamCurry-bh3dk4 ай бұрын

    a good COMANDER always listen to his generals

  • @RobertPaskulovich-fz1th
    @RobertPaskulovich-fz1th11 күн бұрын

    On Day #3 at Gettysburg, Robert E. Lee needed an F-35.

  • @mjciavola
    @mjciavola6 ай бұрын

    Peeves always fire Tim up.😆

  • @user-st3vd5bf6g
    @user-st3vd5bf6g6 ай бұрын

    Pickett’s charge drama of an “almost success” is the same as the Chamberlain saving the free world on Little Round Top non-sense.

  • @dks13827
    @dks138273 күн бұрын

    Tim were you a history teacher by 'trade' ???

  • @colleenrice-lozensky2503
    @colleenrice-lozensky25032 ай бұрын

    Interesting

  • @creatednotcatered8668
    @creatednotcatered86682 ай бұрын

    Many of the myths he debunks can be attributed to the movie Gettysburg; but hey, how many visitors visit Gettysburg because of the movie!

  • @nathanielalgernon975
    @nathanielalgernon9756 ай бұрын

    Excellent history on the third day, ever think of writing a book on your pet peeves, this is some really important things you talk about, should be written down.

  • @markcrampton5873

    @markcrampton5873

    6 ай бұрын

    I would like to see Tim discuss Lee's options if he had forced Meade to retreat.I don't think he had many good ones .

  • @chrisj9904
    @chrisj99046 ай бұрын

    ❤❤❤❤

  • @edschermerhorn5415
    @edschermerhorn54156 ай бұрын

    I wish you would show some passion when confronting these!🤪🤪🤪

  • @petesocks
    @petesocks6 ай бұрын

    Speaking of pet peeves.....Are those pencils made from witness trees 😂

  • @WilliamCurry-bh3dk
    @WilliamCurry-bh3dk4 ай бұрын

    lee should of listened

  • @JDMacko23
    @JDMacko236 ай бұрын

    Hey Tim, you’re a legend…. P.s there’s no EX in especially and there’s no SUS in subscribe 😜🤪

  • @bills6963
    @bills69636 ай бұрын

    Right on about the BS about Ziegler’s Grove being the target of the “Charge”. My pet peeve: “CaLvary” and not “cavalry”. Aaagh! 😝

  • @rosescott9299
    @rosescott92996 ай бұрын

    I always think it’s amazing that the loser of a war, and a traitor who took up arms against this country has his likeness carved into a literal mountain in the country which he took arms against, while the victor has no such thing. A sad lesson in what propaganda will do to repaint history.

  • @T.K...
    @T.K...6 ай бұрын

    The "Pickett's charge almost succeeded" myth is another very popular sentiment amongst the X surrender flag crowd. They love their myths.

  • @andrewc2491
    @andrewc24916 ай бұрын

    3rd day: COMPLETELY "ad lib" on the part of Lee. Complete ignorance coming from successive generations. 100% agreed with Tim. End

Келесі