Meanwhile, in a parallel universe: "Parallel universes probably don't exist and here's why"

@nubslayerex

4 жыл бұрын

DTStar then they find out lol.

@michiganjack1337

4 жыл бұрын

Precisely!

@jbrownjetmech-4783

4 жыл бұрын

Ummmmm...that's a good one.

@neutronenstern.

4 жыл бұрын

Now in this Universe I will tell you why it probably doesent exist: If this theorem is true every time when someone dies in a lonely room, theres another universe where this person will live longer, and another one where it lives longer,... . Then there should be some people just living for a very long time in this universe, too. And with long I mean very long. (Maybe as old as we humans are) So i think this theorem has to be false!

@ShawnPattonC

4 жыл бұрын

@@neutronenstern. You don't really understand how Quantum Immortality works. The probability that someone experiences their own indefinite continued existence is guaranteed. The probability that someone notices someone else doing the same is nigh impossible.

Schrodinger: we don't know whether cat is alive or dead inside the box, until we open it. Cat inside the closed box: Meeoowww..... Schrodinger: Shut up

@LyrelGaming

2 жыл бұрын

Underrated

@gaminghardx

2 жыл бұрын

😆

@joshs5577

2 жыл бұрын

@Andrew Onymous You might want to finish the video

@surelb

2 жыл бұрын

the real question is how much catnip does that cat need!

@Ownxer

2 жыл бұрын

@@surelb a whole lot

In one alternate universe, Schrödinger is in the box and the cat is the one who developed the experiment and is recording the results.

@Rakscha-Sun

5 ай бұрын

Quantum physics is in just so great for making jokes, for this reason alone everyone should have a grasp of it 😂

@AntonioKc

5 ай бұрын

Take it a step forward, the hammer is using a cat to trigger Schrödinger that entangles to a radioactive molecule that its self could be decaying or not. And what is it called when the hammer views the box? Hammer time

@trailingupwards

4 ай бұрын

Cat's Schrodinger

@tomasjenco5609

4 ай бұрын

@@trailingupwards was going to find or write this comment myself :D

@whizzer2944

4 ай бұрын

We are talking of possibilities, not impossibilities dohh

Schrödinger’s equation at 0:24 literally looks like made-up alien satire of an overly complicated equation.

@brianm1902

23 күн бұрын

Partial differential equation. Not alien at all, just beautiful.

@nathanielwilding3779

10 күн бұрын

Das ist good

My curious brain at 3am like “Hell yeah this looks interesting” not understanding any of it

@Cursedbead

2 жыл бұрын

I am the version of u that understood the video

@qtackers9043

2 жыл бұрын

I understand it all and watch theise videos and watch them faithfully

@jasperjude7682

2 жыл бұрын

Fr

@alienprepper5918

2 жыл бұрын

Try some LSD and watch them.Just need to open your mind.

@ORaion.27

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah

There's a version of me out there that understood the whole video.

@FakeIdolatry

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah but it would be extremely unlikely xD

@sakshamchowdhary1841

4 жыл бұрын

@@bakedevvo why so salty

@FayazPA

4 жыл бұрын

@@bakedevvo The fact that people even try to understand these videos should be appreciated. You think everyone works around science? People like you not being able to take a joke says a lot about the state of things here nowadays.

@MrTriple3D

4 жыл бұрын

@@FayazPA leave the kid alone, he probably thinks that trying to sound smart is the same as being smart

@fundemort

4 жыл бұрын

Also there's a version of me out there that don't have atomic clue what the video is all about.

So cool how the guest speaker was like “no I’m not answering your question I’m answering the question you should have asked”

@simens8646

2 ай бұрын

Sean Carroll is one of the world's greatest science communicators. I don't know if he is right about advocating the Everett Many Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics which he describes here, but by sheer eloquence he certainly has nudged me many steps in that direction. There are tons of great Carroll content on youtube.

@MysticVic1

Ай бұрын

I have seen the multiverse.... I have witnessed the unfolding duality of the super position of reality. When I first saw the Jimi Hendrix album cover Axis and Jimi as the many incarnations of Krshna I said : " Jesus...I've seen this before!" Where I had seen it was during an LSD experience about 1967. The Amazing thing is, it wasn't until about 1972 while traversing Logan Airport a Hare Krishnna monk, saffron robes and all walked directly up to me and handed me a hardbound copy of the Bagavad Gita and simply said " this is for you" When I opened it up and the first thing I see Is the actual representation of Krishna and all of his MANY WORLDS self i just about had an LSD flash back. I have EXPERIANCED, WITNESSED the ever splitting reality of reality. I had seen Krishna 5 yrs before I had any inkling of Hinduism. Am I a Hindu now or ever? Fk no. I'm an idiot. Yea...I perused the Gita for decades. Kept it on my night stand. Kept it in the Vberth on my sailboat. Did I GET anything out of it? Na. I get more out of physics lectures on quantum mechanics. BUT ! The parallel between them is UNDENIABLE. I have witnessed reality streaming right at and through me as 2 film strips and me frozen between them . I'm just looking for anyone with similar experience. Compare notes. Try to figure out how to move between the different realities....maybe..choose carefully !!! The rest of you can chalk me up as insane. Hare Krsna😅

@lazthegreat10

Ай бұрын

Classic nerd power trip, I'm smarter than you

7:28 im legit using this to help solve the Zelda Timeline AND Kingdom Hearts lore and the fact it fits PERFECTLY is insane. Metaphysics, quantum mechanics mixed with religoin from MANY cultures. Man i love video games lol

@tigrus245

22 күн бұрын

Care to explain? Sounds interesting

@BioAlpha5

21 күн бұрын

@@tigrus245 I have a few videos already on my channel about this but currently working on a few Kingdom Hearts videos too that are yet to be uploaded. I got work so ill leave this open and make another comment when i get home with some more stuff.

@gregoryturk1275

19 күн бұрын

@@BioAlpha5cool

It feels like the more you know, the more you realize how less you know

@aurorax2374

3 жыл бұрын

Best comment haha

@SantiagoDavel

3 жыл бұрын

That was said by Socrates only 'a couple' years ago (:

@slendydie1267

3 жыл бұрын

idk who said that but i've heard this quote which i love: "All i know is that i know nothing and you dont even know that"

@santino6623

3 жыл бұрын

I've heard a similar quote that goes like "The surface area of ignorance grows much faster than that of knowledge"

@BilalKhan-pd5xb

3 жыл бұрын

TRue af

Meanwhile, in a parallel universe: “Wow, 2020 has been a great year!”

@user-fj2ms9fw9r

3 жыл бұрын

Finally released those flying cars we've been dreaming about.

@yooseul__

3 жыл бұрын

Антон Солнцев all our problems were solved like global warming or racism

@LawNeu

3 жыл бұрын

JAUNE OSVIR NAVARRO so doing nothing and down playing a pandemic is “The best president ever” I think not.

@tammychapman3395

3 жыл бұрын

Or many eons in the future someone from somewhere else will say: "Well according to all our data, humans went extinct in 2020! If they had handled it properly they would still exist. Were humans really that stupid? Those idiots."

@yooseul__

3 жыл бұрын

LJ Neuenfeldt i think you took their comment the wrong way i think they meant instead of trump not doing anything he was actually a good president

I've never entirely understood the theory under this, but I for a long time I have thought about it as: there is a universe/world/dimension for every possible position of every particle in the universe. That is not infinite, but it is extremely close to it. Of course the probability of some arrangements are higher than others, so there will be far more universes where e.g. a pile of sand remains a pile of sand compared, versus much fewer universes where a pile of sand spontaneously forms the alphabet, or becomes the Eiffel Tower.

@evanallen7896

3 ай бұрын

That is correct. The vast majority of worlds are completely normal. There is a similar lesson when learning about the second law of thermodynamics. It is technically possible for broken glass to unbreak, and it will definitely happen given enough time, but it is extraordinarily unlikely.

@laoban2023

13 күн бұрын

A good attach

This is the most profound description of our reality that I have found. The lights you shine are powerful Dr. Muller. Thank you.

This explains why two socks go in the dryer and one comes out. They are both in there, but once I open the dryer door, the universe splits and I lose one sock.

@Wycoolp

2 жыл бұрын

Imagine another you is just trolling you by taking ur socks lol

@doaditty123

2 жыл бұрын

In a parrallel universe out there, Beer thinks about me while im at work....

@StephenDelRosario777

2 жыл бұрын

@@doaditty123 *Cool bug facts*

@jashandeepsingh2239

2 жыл бұрын

Lol that's funny

@Altiveda

2 жыл бұрын

@@doaditty123 I want the world where my beer goes to work for me and comes home and ceases to exist outside of my belly. then i send another beer in again.

Meanwhile in parallel universes: Parallel universe doesn’t exist and here’s why

@juaquiqui-kun4333

2 жыл бұрын

Another parallel universe: you can travel to parallel universes and here’s why

@FadedLion77

2 жыл бұрын

@@gyrotheweeb another parallel universe: you can be on all parallel universes and here's why

@dandhi4688

2 жыл бұрын

@@FadedLion77 another parallel universe: you can't be on all parallel universes and here's why

@xooox_1777

2 жыл бұрын

Another parallel universe : we don't exist, we're just a dream of some random kid

@funynonsence

2 жыл бұрын

@@xooox_1777 another parallel universe: we don’t exist, we’re just a dream of some random adult and here’s why

Absolutely mind blowing. Had to rewind the segment w the electron screen to fully grasp.... But, wheeew - this is amazing! Truly wild, and quite fun, to ponder!!!!!!!

Your many worlds explanation is a lot more bananas than the crazy idea that there are different rules for observed or not. The different rules idea is a simpler Ockhams razor than universes splitting and energy interacting across worlds. You could also say the wave function super collapses the moment it interacts with anything.

@evanallen7896

3 ай бұрын

You couldn't be further from the truth. You are severely mistaken about Occam's razor. First off, the multiple different worlds in MW come as a conclusion, not an assumption. If something strange turns out to be a consequence of prior assumptions in a theory, then it doesn't make the theory any less likely. Occam's razor calls for fewer beginning assumptions. Whatever comes as a consequence doesn't affect Occam's razor since they aren't additional assumptions. Secondly, if you listen carefully to what Carroll is saying, you will notice he makes the point that there is only one single wave function. This seems to conflict with the idea that there are multiple universes. Carroll explained this by saying that any branching is a non-fundamental human description of what is happening, but really the different worlds are part of the same wave function, they just almost never interact. MW is just what you get when you assume that there is one wave function and it obeys the Schrodinger equation. That's it. Extremely simple. Moreover, other interpretations do in fact use the same assumptions as MW, but then they make completely unnecessary additional assumptions that are exceptions to the previous rules. It is completely unnecessary because MW is already as simple as you can get while still getting quantum mechanics. MW is just what you get when you take quantum mechanics seriously, it is even debatable that it is an interpretation at all. Adding on additional assumptions that don't follow the Schrodinger equation for no additional benefit, is extremely bad according to Occam's razor.

A friend of mine that was high at the time mused "If every possibility makes a new reality that means that in a couple of them you're a building because one of your parents became an architect instead of having you."

@jakerittlinger440

2 жыл бұрын

Wow now that is a pot induced statement and an incredible one. So I'll offer another one: If you take your shirt off, turn it inside-out and put it back on, then the whole universe is wearing your shirt except for you.

@antonioangeconeb3196

2 жыл бұрын

You ever take magic mushrooms and think about those things? like why we’re here etc.

@moneypleasebeup3324

2 жыл бұрын

😂

@Goldiavolo

2 жыл бұрын

@@jakerittlinger440 how

@whitedragoness23

2 жыл бұрын

No

"Does that mean that there's a universe where I'm smarter than you?" "Yes, and there's also a universe where you're funny" -Stephen Hawking

@al-hn7fc

3 жыл бұрын

Rest in peace Stephen. He left us to early.

@user-ww8qf1wz8w

3 жыл бұрын

@@al-hn7fc could there be a universe where Hawking is still alive??

@Golgo2047

3 жыл бұрын

Taken literally, I like to think how he could have left to earlier. (Don't you hate how everyone typos 'to' with "too" many o's? Too; lol. ~drips sarcasm~ :)

@darthnihilus511

3 жыл бұрын

Bro your profile pic is amazing

@AmberAmber

3 жыл бұрын

@@Golgo2047 Not a spelling test, mate. XO

this explanation of schrodingers cat is very different from most out there but makes way more sense. in all the other versions I have seen, the cat is in a superposition of alive and dead but that changes when you open the box and when you open the box it becomes one or the other.

@evanallen7896

3 ай бұрын

Cats have a high temperature and emit lots and lots of photons. If you want the cat to be in a superposition, you need to avoid getting entangled by the cat. If one of the photons from the cat interacts with you, now your wave functions cannot be described separately but instead as one wave function. So you yourself would get into a superposition. If that happens, one version of you would see cat alive and another would see cat dead. As for why the cat was already alive or dead before you open the box, it is because it is basically impossible to shield the cat from the outer environment. The box isn't good enough.

Very good explanation. David Deutsch's the Fabric of Reality is another beautiful way to approach understanding quatam mechanics starting from a simple object like a torchlight

In a parallel world the cat puts Shrödinger in the box.

@krinka1458

2 жыл бұрын

"the cat's Schrodinger"

@robertabarnhart6240

2 жыл бұрын

I'd like to put Schrodinger in that box! Dude, why you hate cats???

@nguyenminhquang9393

2 жыл бұрын

@@robertabarnhart6240 gay

@xalat6277

2 жыл бұрын

Lmaooo

@BillAnt

2 жыл бұрын

I'd put both the cat and Shrödinger in the box and flatten it with a bulldozer. Guarantee both are dead without even having to look.... paradox solved! lol

"The cat is both alive and dead now" Cat: *Meow* Schrödinger: I don't hear anything

@Tan3l6

3 жыл бұрын

In Soviet Russia Cat observes you.

@michaelsmusic3532

3 жыл бұрын

That's funny ! I love cats BTW

@Jenny-tm3cm

3 жыл бұрын

Fry: alive or dead? ALIVE OR DEAD?!!?!

@LightAmVibed12317

3 жыл бұрын

In a parallel world: Cat: ... Schrödinger: Wake up!

@MagyarGaben

3 жыл бұрын

@@LightAmVibed12317 Schrödinger: "Hey, you, you're finally awake..."

You're the first to actually answer my, "What about an impossibly long rod?" question that stumped my lecturer when I asked about it.

Great work. We need educators like you

When you have two socks, neither of them are right or left. However, when you put one sock on your right foot, the other automatically becomes left, wherever it is.

@gian9907

4 жыл бұрын

i love it :D

@gingerelvira6587

4 жыл бұрын

Only if U observe the sock on a foot

@neetisaini2378

4 жыл бұрын

Hahaha...you completely understood the topic it seems...

@michaelesgro9506

4 жыл бұрын

So, if I follow what you're saying, if I wash both socks but then accidentally put the right one on my left foot and the left on my right, the next time I wash them this explains why ONLY ONE one of them comes out of the dryer and I will never find the other one no matter how hard I try..because it is no longer that sock?...a split occurred and the sock is now in a parallel universe posing as my sock...OK, I think you need to win the Nobel in Physics for this and I need to lay down. EDIT: Schroedinger's Cat is being replaced by Natiko's Sock...no one open their dryers if you want the socks to still be "here"

@bjhansknecht3566

4 жыл бұрын

@@michaelesgro9506 No, here's the secret truth about lost drier socks: One of them explodes in the drier... that's where lint comes from.

In a Parallel world Cat is experimenting on Schrödinger inside a box.

@cianvincentmaduay2599

2 жыл бұрын

Human sized cats, cat sized humans

@TheFaro2011

2 жыл бұрын

You definitely didn't get the concept

@magicmanhs7718

2 жыл бұрын

@@cianvincentmaduay2599 so then humans and cats would be the same height?

@mr.kakarot5937

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheFaro2011 You definitely didn't get the humour

@bharatgiri5883

2 жыл бұрын

I am u from a parallel universe.

Well done. In my scientific discussions with the late Dr. Murray Gell-Mann while I was at SFI, he shared with me he believed in the many worlds hypothesis.

Got some intuition and now i have some understanding You are doing a good job

There's another universe where a scientist has already found the proof that alternate universes cannot exist.

@elimarburger1659

2 жыл бұрын

Only if the wave function attributed a nonzero probability to that outcome though. 🙃

@alxmtncstudio2066

2 жыл бұрын

That paradox!

@JohnLloydScharf

2 жыл бұрын

Prove it.

@ZucchiZ

2 жыл бұрын

That's not possible Not only a paradox, a contradiction

@roberthendrix5267

2 жыл бұрын

More than one way to skin a cat.prove that

“I think it’s embarrassing we have no idea” Me who knows nothing about quantum mechanics: wow, losers.

@pillow1557

3 жыл бұрын

Meanwhile you in another universe who knows about quantum mechanics: *Wow true*

@Ryan-li1ro

3 жыл бұрын

@@pillow1557 this is underrated

@birbman1169

3 жыл бұрын

@@Ryan-li1ro Meanwhile you in another universe : this is overrated

@michaeldavis8250

3 жыл бұрын

@@Ryan-li1ro +1q Edit: i have no idea what i meant by this comment. Does it make any sense to you guys? I think i was drunk when i wrote it.

@xaigoart

3 жыл бұрын

@@pillow1557 "Wow true. Losers."

So far, I am convinced with the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. My only concern is that the idea that every quantum measurement creates multiple parallel realities prompts questions about how energy fits in this framework. In classical mechanics, the conservation of energy states that the total energy in an isolated system remains constant over time, in that none is created or destroyed, only transformed and redistributed. If applied to the many-worlds interpretation, each multiversal branch, which is representative of a different outcome of a quantum measurement as a result of wave function collapse, would conserve energy within itself. In other words, the total energy across all branches remains constant. However, we have to take into account quantum fluctuations, where energy can briefly pop up in a tiny space due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. These fluctuations are inherent in the quantum nature of reality and can lead to temporary violations against energy conservation within certain constraints dictated by quantum mechanics. The way I see it, these temporary violations are observed only in one multiversal branch. With the realization of all possible outcomes of a quantum event into separate branches, each branch will have its own probability amplitude. From a statistical perspective, the overall energy distribution across the multiverse would follow probabilities dictated by quantum mechanics ensuring that while multiple scenarios are possible, they occur with appropriate probabilities that maintain energy balance overall, so the conservation principle is preserved. Nevertheless, we have to take into account decoherence, one that gravely affects the quantum system as factors like the observer, other particles, and radiation become entangled with it, leading to the apparent wavefunction collapse. Decoherence remains a significant challenge in quantum computing as it introduces errors and loss of quantum information after the collapse occurred. From a practical standpoint, the fundamental dilemma still remains: overall many-worlds-system complexity - the discussion of energy sufficiency in the many-worlds interpretation as understood within the framework of quantum reality is bound to intersect with broader debates about the nature of reality, the role of the observers, and the interpretation of quantum probabilities in various quantum interpretations. I guess, I'd have to study more of these in quantum field theory (QFT).

@fenris7985

9 күн бұрын

unless... there is an infinite number of worlds, that would mean that the law of energy conservation would not be broken. But it would also interfere the with the probability because it would mean that everything would be (1/infinite). But i find it easier to believe that parallel worlds dont exist and people came up with the idea when trying to understand probability. also im just a random guy knowing nothing so dont believe me if u dont wanna

Good information and exerting efforts Doctor

A parallel world; that's where my guitar picks go whenever I drop them on the floor and can't find them.

@TedWade73

3 жыл бұрын

Same parallel universe where lost socks go, do the picks and socks go in different universes, or does each individual item get its own universe?

@69k_gold

3 жыл бұрын

Sean's description of parallel universes as air particles is accurate. You see, two air molecules never occur in the same position in space, in a similar way, it's impossible for us human beings or even any other particle made out of quantum particles in our universe to interact with the other versions of themselves cuz it'll break the reality. If we actually create a portal into a parallel world, it just shows that all the particles that are interacting in both versions exist in superposition while observing, which is not possible according to Schrodinger's equation. So yeah, it's unlikely that your lost socks or guitar picks went into a parallel universe.

@jessewoo3946

3 жыл бұрын

Meanwhile, in a parallel universe: “Wow, 2020 has been a great year!”

@daphneraven9439

3 жыл бұрын

That’s where the black hole at the rear of the laundry machine leads-you know, the one that exacts a sacrifice of one of the left socks (I wear toe socks) and gloves per load, along with favourite guitar picks, and the odd pair of comfiest undies... That parallel universe is, to some, where they, themselves, expect to go at the end of this life’s journey, at which time those same souls will be reunited with each and every item that they lost down that hole.

@aminishnamedvaati

3 жыл бұрын

the parallel universe is just socks and guitar picks

I feel like I'm in a quantum state of knowing what he's talking about and following along and also being completely and utterly lost.

@TheMuratJohn

4 жыл бұрын

lol, this.

@reethareid4068

4 жыл бұрын

Same.. same..🤔

@yt-sh

4 жыл бұрын

xD

@protection_fire

4 жыл бұрын

This.

@zeken4094

4 жыл бұрын

well if you know what his talking and add that to what you think he is talking about and square that the probability is that you are lost...........................simpilz

3 weeks ago today, I survived a horrific car crash accident and watched my boyfriend lose his life in front of me. I'm watching this because somewhere in another universe, my boyfriend survived a car crash instead of me. It brings me comfort that he is safe in that alternate universe. I wish it was possible to cross universes because the universe where I am in now, (where I survived, and he didn't), and the other where I didn't survive, but he did, both of us right now are in the same place, desperate to get another glimpse of each other...

"Despite this being intended as a thought experiment, Schrodinger helpfully notes that the device must be secured from interference by the cat." This man knew cats.

Me watching this instead of doing my HW* Me to my teacher- I did my HW but I did not do my HW, it is in superposition, don't check it, it would be wrong measurement

@rafaldakowicz1901

4 жыл бұрын

Great answer, you would definately make him/her day :D

@adamblackwelder9202

4 жыл бұрын

As a high school physics teacher, this would make my day

@somedragontoslay2579

4 жыл бұрын

Then I would answer that your score is now also entangled and you will measure it until the end of the semester. Now you'll have all the suspense a whole semester. You're welcome.

@ChristmasEve777

4 жыл бұрын

If the class you skipped your homework on is quantum theory, then you may just place out of the class for saying that!

@prachetasnayse9709

4 жыл бұрын

You need more likes.

USB plugs exist in one of three states: the up state, the down state, and the super positioned state. Only when you look at the USB plug does its state collapse into one or the other which is why it never goes in until you look at it.

@artryxx7481

3 жыл бұрын

this is genius

@pekkalaitinen8769

3 жыл бұрын

this is the only possible explanation

@RowynOfficial

3 жыл бұрын

That’s terrifyingly funny

@notyetskeletal4809

3 жыл бұрын

Profound, topical and extremely relatable to a potentially infinite amount of people.

@alexswanson655

3 жыл бұрын

Comment of the year hahahaha

I wish this thought still filled me with awe and wonder and didn't just make me feel exhausted. That's just _so much stuff._ I'm at that age where all anyone really wants in life is an elegantly uncluttered metaphysical ontology, but already today I had to confront the implication of Mathematical Platonism for the embodiment of phenomenology, and _now_ apparently I gotta live in a Jorge Luis Borges story! What a country! Also tho, think about how this would mean that you're additionally splitting at every instant because one version of you suddenly died from things like a totally random aneurysm, and so you're constantly leaving behind a multiversal trail of your own corpse, dropping behind you like the afterimages of window dragged on a hanging computer desktop as you strut around town or dance at the club, and piling up alongside you in your chair or at your feet right at this very moment as you read this sentence, unwittingly packed inside the invisible depths of your own mass grave. Fortunately for you, you don't have to worry about seeing those universes because by definition you're not in them, but unfortunately it means versions of your friends and loved ones ARE always discovering your browser history.

I love that this explanation has to come up with an entire universe with all its mass and energy each time there's a choice... Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem ~ Ockham

Veritasium: "Now, this may seem obvious." Me on the couch eating chips: "Ya of course."

@scottdenesen8044

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

@archerweaver6018

3 жыл бұрын

He feels better about himself when he uses shop talk.

@BenderdickCumbersnatch

3 жыл бұрын

16:11 *"The Universe could be infinitely big..." like your mom.*

@randomhooman3236

3 жыл бұрын

you are eating chips and not eating at the same time

@BenderdickCumbersnatch

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fWiKtZeaicKnj9I.html

Let me tell ya, screen writers have gotten more use out of this theory than any physicist

@hardyquinn9442

2 жыл бұрын

Haha underated comment right here!

@hydrocomet

2 жыл бұрын

We’re all watching this now lol

@grandrapids57

2 жыл бұрын

NO KIDDING- this completely ridiculous "theory" is fodder for college freshman who are tying to show themselves as deep thinkers.

@thejoeman4162

2 жыл бұрын

Marvels what if

@JohnWickkkk

2 жыл бұрын

I’m 420 like 😎🌬

The last 4 minutes blew my mind. Everything just is, and we’re grasping at the straws on the floor trying to describe what is, or could be, when it’s all just actually happening.

I just stumbled upon this video and I was instantly reminded about long ago when I used to dream about an alternate world where my childhood crush liked me back. Thank you for this video, it is an inspiration.

My boss thinks I'm a quantum particle, he's always asking me to be in two places at the same time

@zch3349

2 жыл бұрын

You can just be in one place. And later tell him that you have been in both places. Another quantum particle of you did go to another place for sure.

@mishellnamjoon2787

2 жыл бұрын

@@zch3349 true 🤓🤳

@danielserrano5462

2 жыл бұрын

aye

@hassang4886

2 жыл бұрын

Tell your boss there is a version of you in both places and there is a version of you who is the boss of your boss. If it dosen't make sense tell him there is a version of your boss who knows what you are talking about hahah

@UnblockMind

2 жыл бұрын

And here I thought you could never get out of the middle....Malcolm

“You have to remember that the whole idea of branching is just a human convenience” Glad he added this line in the end, this is exactly the point of all of it. The true laws of the universe are nowhere near the way we are describing it. It's just a matter of having a more fitting and more complete mathematical explanation of the bahaviour of the universe.

@user255

4 жыл бұрын

_"The true laws of the universe are nowhere near the way we are describing it."_ Or maybe they are, we have no way to know it. But fortunately it doesn't matter at all, as long as they work.

@numbereightyseven

4 жыл бұрын

And woop-de-doo for that. I'm just going to stay in n the real world of having fun, loving our families, doing kind and generous things, and/or struggling for survival.

@SugarTouch

4 жыл бұрын

vsauce has video about physical laws and their role in universe as explanations. Michael tells the same - laws are not the reasons of events in universe. They are just assuming the relationship in-between. He tells about nail in the desk and the shadow from it. Length of the shadow is determined by physical laws and depends on height of the nail. You could even calculate the height of the nail by knowing length of the shadow and position of light. This is the law. BUT length of the shadow isn't a _reason_ for height of nail. Nail's height isn't caused by length of its shadow. These values are tangled but not in cause-effect way. It's just our way to describe relationship in-between. Absolutely real and existing relations but NOT the reasons of things. You're talking exactly about the same. Our math is the way to find out relations and consequences, not the way to discover the reasons. And our theories are always just a models. Robert Anton Wilson tells us not to mess territory and its map :) Laws of physics are our map of reality. It's not a good idea to mess it with reality itself :) Maps are useful are reflects real things but they are just a models.

@rickybruce472

4 жыл бұрын

@@user255 As long as the rules seeming to work doesn't obscure some less obvious pattern that might become obvious if we accept that eventually under some conditions this rule fails.

@user255

4 жыл бұрын

@@rickybruce472 Yes, the reason why science is cycle of predictions and tests for the predictions.

13:43 This is like the ‘life is a computer simulation’ idea. A computer doesn’t have to simulate the entire universe. It only has to simulate what is being perceived. Many worlds doesn’t violate conservation of energy because it only has to account for observable energy.

its crazy that ive watched this video before but only now, with more lived experience and after having watched a short video summing up thee basics of quantum mechanics, now I actually understand this video and I feel insane rn

So today i know why i failed in life. I was full of endless possibilities, but ppl observed me and i became limited.

@jyotievane15

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/eYdrqNlwnpeWfco.html

@killer809829

3 жыл бұрын

Deep

@24385302

3 жыл бұрын

big brain gang

@faysolreza5535

3 жыл бұрын

Underrated

@mrsmartmouth8393

3 жыл бұрын

Lol. This sounds so poetic.

Meanwhile in another universe: Parallel worlds probably doesn't exist: here's why And the me in another universe, typed *don't* instead of *doesnt*

@timezone5259

4 жыл бұрын

Underrated

@Nadindel

4 жыл бұрын

@@Auziuwu actually there is a world where doesn't is the proper way to say that

@spriksie

4 жыл бұрын

@@Nadindel I'm slain.

@theknightwhosayn1

4 жыл бұрын

Hello there brother

@junerye

4 жыл бұрын

Meanwhile in a parallel universe there's a comment that says there are parallel universes

By that logic energy should decay in each copy of reality we are present in (as branching happens energy is split according to the square of probability) which yet again debunks this idea. Or perhaps this is the explanation for the expantion pf the universe. One could think of the expantion as a decay in energy. One could argue the expantion of the universe is just a dialation of energy density and after renormalization this is just energy decay. And as the universe expends energy decays and interaction rate changes and thus splitting rate changes changing the expantion rate - which explpains another weird phenoma. Have a good day yall!

Sean Carrol says in a way it’s almost like philosophy for life. You don’t need to care about every tiny probability… the future is unknown and I know I had my share of problems and worries of things I cannot control and it could not happen. We need to be better of living with probabilities and uncertainty

This gives the term "be the best version of yourself" a totally new and deeper meaning.

@perrowaton801

2 жыл бұрын

si

@ginalinetti8975

2 жыл бұрын

Something that's probably true but also infinitely impossible

@Merilirem

2 жыл бұрын

@@ginalinetti8975 One of those versions has to be the "best". So its not impossible.

@Merilirem

2 жыл бұрын

Highlander rules, there can only be one!

@supercvnt

2 жыл бұрын

F in the chat

This means there are versions of us that aren’t failures

@dannywest8843

4 жыл бұрын

They're not us though. Fuckin' failures.

@c0smo709

4 жыл бұрын

Wrong

@damnfez

4 жыл бұрын

Not for you. Schrodinger's equation doesn't account for things that are impossible.

@eddo2948

4 жыл бұрын

certainly, but the probabilities are very low

@rebeccax1431

4 жыл бұрын

Impossible

Im understanding this as there are no choices in our universe. Everytime we make a decision or pick a fork in the road a new branch is created where someone takes the rest of the routes and thus there is never a singular choice made. There is no chance, in order for a choice to be right the universe needs to play out all possible choices to calculate the outcome.

I don't know how to explain but now I understand what everything is. Gonna go ahead and try to write some equations

It's nice to know that in all those worlds, the earth is still round.

@greenetomphson6164

3 жыл бұрын

or at the very least, in at least one of those worlds, everyone agrees the Earth is round.

@N01Meow

3 жыл бұрын

ikr

@thesigmaenigma9102

3 жыл бұрын

Red sus

@ExacoMvm

3 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure in half of these "worlds" there's no Earth anymore :D

@aadiMjoahi

3 жыл бұрын

the earth isnt round in this world either, it looks more like a badly made model out of clay

A whole new meaning of “be the best version of yourself”.

@Dave96939

3 жыл бұрын

i asked God about it, received an answer in a dream. There is not multiple worlds that exists, it is multiple POSSIBILITIES that exists. Once the timeline is changed, the old timeline no longer exists except as a known possibility. Strangely though, time is like a river and 'residues' from the old timeline can carry over to the new. Also prayers of the previous timelines still carries over to the new timeline even if that prayer no longer gets prayed. figure that

@stargazer6814

3 жыл бұрын

I agree with both of you! Remember, whatever the conscious mind affirms, visualizes, and suggests, the unconscious mind will start building into your life.

@fairyofshampoo4109

3 жыл бұрын

@@Dave96939 wowoow i never knew that :0

@prcr364

3 жыл бұрын

@fairyofshampoo Please confirm sarcasm

@fenrir9398

3 жыл бұрын

Hard when all the other "me" are thinking the same.

I dont know why but this all just makes complete sense to mem i dont find hard to think or understand that the universe is the whole wave function and we arent spliting it, we are just experiencing a slice of it

Hey, thanks man, I get a lot of stuff about this a lot better now

He broke it down and explained everything in detail and I’m still lost lol

@laurenlewis3605

2 жыл бұрын

I thought I was the only one

@kyrosite1810

2 жыл бұрын

You're not alone

@shivanichoubey22

2 жыл бұрын

Dude, I have studied all of this before quarantine and now I can't remember any of it 😭😭😭

@seanlintermoot

2 жыл бұрын

Same

@meekiemoos7637

2 жыл бұрын

same

One of the only media representations I've seen on this that seemed to understand that Schrodinger was NOT trying to prove the cat was both dead and alive, but rather trying to demonstrate a problem with quantum theory.

@phaseloli6668

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, it was designed to show how the laws of Quantum Mechanics don't mesh with the real world as the cat isn't dead or alive at the same time

@thewanderingmistnull2451

2 жыл бұрын

Right, he was trying to show how ridiculous that assumption was, despite the fact that the assumption had to be true for the double-slit experiment to work.

@PaLaS0

2 жыл бұрын

yall ever just break the quantum theory by manipulating tickbase? I actually call double-slit - double tap, you just shift ticks or break sequence while doing swap and it breaks perception of time which causes whole issue with relativity and quantum physics

@hContentOftheInternet

2 жыл бұрын

I wouldn’t be surprised if someday we find out that the universe is infinitely big or ever expanding in all dimensions, not just in distance or time. Maybe all we are is some sort of energy that simply exists, and everything that happens(including its existence) can be described as entropy. That way it makes sense how the Big Bang happened without anything “prior”, since we all are just waves of energy and it simply transcends states infinitely. So maybe everything is infinite in infinite ways that it could be infinite(like the multiverse theory). Then perhaps physics could be treated as math

your stuff just keeps improving. I'm not an academic, but: If we would be in a simulated reality, what would be the computational power of running such a reality? especially if you consider than the more we evolve the more we can observe... branching out the reality wave function even more. how can you say that what you observe or somebody else does, does not involve "Environmental decoherence"?! From observing far out the universe to sub atomic level the more we observe the more we get entangled. The more we discover and understand the more we get entangled. Is that the reason the universe is expanding and accelerating? This theory seems exacerbating an infinite possibilities of realities. How can something simulate that? Does This theory collide with a possible simulated reality?? too many questions

@bschwand

Ай бұрын

In a simulated reality (i.e. we live in a simulation) all this becomes much simpler (and consistent). Actually the more I learn quantum physics and the more I think we live in a simulation. In a simulation, multiple universes are not necessary. The reason there is a wave collapse is simply because that is the point where the simulation resolves its necessary state to be able to continue the simulation. Just like in a video game. Not all objects or elements are kept active and simulated, only those important (interacting) in the simulation. Any object only exist because it has been looked at or interacts with something else. That is consistent with the fact that conscience is a necessary component of reality (i.e. a conscious observer is required for reality to exist or form). Until then, everything is virtual, we know it's there or has potential but has no fixed characteristics, i.e. is a probability or wave function. When interacted with, it comes into being, thus the wave function collapses. Simulation theory also solves why everything is actually quantum (pixelated in space and time) and not continuous (because the simulation saves energy/memory by only representing and keeping tracks of that is interacting in the simulation). Time is not continuous as we know, in a simulation it's because there is a clock on which ticks the simulation advances. It also solves how things can be entangled (i.e. spooky action at a distance, at faster than light speed): the simulation runs and resolves everything on each clock tick, that can take however long outside the simulation but inside the simulation it appears instant since... we are frozen in-between clock ticks. To me the simulation theory seems much more plausible that the multiverse... And consistent with our own progress too. If we came this far in 50 years, computation and simulation-wise, imagine what a technological civilisation say 50000 years old could have already achieved. Seems very probably the capability to simulate an entire universe could have evolved. And if you take into account the size of the universe and time it has existed, the probability we are NOT in a simulation is close to zero.

I think that your consciousness lives in the universe it believes is the most probable for you. This also explains how your beliefs and convictions can influence your future (= the path of your consciousness).

Is there a part 1 to this? I feel like I just walked into class 30 mins late.

@Rohit-jv7nl

3 жыл бұрын

same

@easyelectronics4364

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂💯

@sumaiyaali7952

3 жыл бұрын

Try watching a simpler video about Quantum mechanics to get an idea about the basics then watch this video

@JanneWolterbeek

3 жыл бұрын

same here, lol. The video wasn't too accessible is my critique.

@ko7302

3 жыл бұрын

Haha he is talking about more advanced quantum theory.

“Me nodding my head up and down acting like I know what he’s talking about”

@rubeneckersley

4 жыл бұрын

@Smoov Cat I have no idea what you're on about, but I totally agree

@joewalker5741

4 жыл бұрын

Every time there are options, every option or path is taken. Example: You are at a cross roads, you can walk 1 of 3 ways and in actual fact you will walk every way, but to do that 3 realities are made and they are made at the moment you take action.

@gangoffour6690

4 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂. My neck is hurting also !

@karlcorrz

4 жыл бұрын

@Smoov Cat Consciousness is transcendnt and is fundamentally indescribable in chemical terms

@kestrels_xp9338

4 жыл бұрын

Joe Walker Yeah but those options are also every single alternation/superposition that exists

14:00 If the number of splits is finite, then not everything is possible. Then only a select number of states is possible. Unless for every split, there's an infinite number of outcomes that occur from the Schrödinger equation.

Wow this really made me lmao. i remember steven hawking talking about this before and the guy asked him if there's a parallel universe where hes smarter than him and hawking response was "yes. Theres also one where youre funny"

@orphenocou4742

3 жыл бұрын

Lol, I do wonder about him saying 100% of outcomes exist in the multiverse. I don’t see how that’s possible. If it were true that means anything you could think of is possible, including one where every planet is inhabited by humans, and those humans suddenly and spontaneously sprout 5 heads that shoot to the end of the visible universe and that just wouldn’t be...*head shoots to the end of the universe* J/k the other guy explains it to him at 15 mins

@KhushiSharma-ci2kf

3 жыл бұрын

@@orphenocou4742 maybe its 100% outcomes following the laws of the universe?

@orphenocou4742

3 жыл бұрын

@@KhushiSharma-ci2kf yeah, his comment was a bit more vague than that. Like I said at the end of my comment the other guy explains it to him at 15 minutes basically in the way that you’re saying. He was saying infinite possibilities and infinite possibilities isn’t possible. Although some of them don’t have to follow the same rules of our universe if different rules apply for theirs

@user-ss6gp2gu6r

3 жыл бұрын

@@KhushiSharma-ci2kf but what if the laws of physics can change between universes? Like some are in hyperbolic space

@lugaidster

3 жыл бұрын

@@orphenocou4742 There's no multiple universes following different rules. there's one universe with its set of rules and multiple possibilities that obey those rules.

I'm not lazy, my energy is just stored in a different world.

@sh4dow176

4 жыл бұрын

hAHa *s A M E*

@klaasterpstra6119

4 жыл бұрын

LOL :)

@Rio_Talks

4 жыл бұрын

you are like me ;)

@LittleSuzi86

4 жыл бұрын

Nova. Haha🤣 Yes... that was good!

@ygkoz

4 жыл бұрын

Ima use that 💯💯

Great video! I just wanted to say that if probability is equal to |amplitude|^2 then you’l have, at some points, an infinite number of nonzero probabilities adding up to infinity when they should add up to one. Probability density is equal to the |amplitude|^2, probability is found by integration.

@danielkennedy2371

7 ай бұрын

You also need the postulate that the possibilities (mathematically, the eigenfunctions) squared (technically, the norm squared, or the eigenfunctions times their complex conjugates) add up to one. This is one of Bohr's postulates and solves the issue you've identified.

At the beginning of the video the music in the background has the same drums as Overture from Halo Reach

No matter how boring my life is, I’m glad to know that there’s a universe where I really AM James Bond.

@painovoimaton

3 жыл бұрын

What about the universe in which there is a version of you permanently under the most hellish torment imaginable?

@tigerkralle

3 жыл бұрын

@@painovoimaton bruh...

@Dythcr

3 жыл бұрын

@@painovoimaton bruh

@kamronpowell5784

3 жыл бұрын

Daniel Schaeffer 😂😂

@mahadplayz6040

3 жыл бұрын

Runagate bruh

I have nothing but respect for people that understand this stuff fully………. In this universe.

@nostalji75

2 жыл бұрын

I think you cannot. There are questions where we can only make educated guesses with mathematical predictions. It helps to get a better understanding of what we precieve, but it doesn't prove anything. The prof there gets pretty far with rational logical thinking. But when it comes to quantum physics we meet the limits of our perception (even enhanced with sensitive tools). We don't even fully understand how our own brains processes this input. But still Props well deserved.

@tolentarpay5464

2 жыл бұрын

And, of course, there's still the bizarre phenomenon of "Dark-Respect", that strange riddle dealing with all the missing Courtesy & Politeness in the Universe...& don't even get me started on the conundrum of "Anti-respect"; for instance, did you know that when Respect & Anti-respect collide, what occurs is sweet F.A.? Now surely, that can't be right! Unless you believe in the Nielson Conjecture: "Don't call me Shirley"...

@markmiller6402

2 жыл бұрын

@@tolentarpay5464 . Mind blown

@MrTalkingzero

2 жыл бұрын

@@tolentarpay5464 A quantum physicist walks into a bar and orders two drinks. The barktender asks - why two? The physicist replies, there's is a very very tiny chance that a beautiful woman will emerge from a parallel Universe right into this planet, into this city, into this bar right next to me and then she already will have a drink from me and maybe she will want to have a conversation. The Bartender says, look, professor, there's a beautiful woman already sitting at the other end of the bar. Why don't you bring this drink to her and maybe she will talk to you. The quantum physicist laughs and says, yeah, right... What are the odds of THAT HAPPENING?

@planktonfun1

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe in another universe 1+1=4

I noticed that you didn’t talk about Young’s experiment’s most important aspect that when you fire one electron at a time. There’s a wave pattern even then giving the idea that it’s a wave until it collapses on xray screen. Otherwise one can think the electrons might just be interacting with other electrons and creating the wave pattern.

To think that in another potential universe I have everything I want, and in another, I have nothing is almost incomprehensible to me

Elsewhere in a parallel universe: Hey Michael, Veritasium here

@StGroovy

4 жыл бұрын

Worlds colliding!

@James42_

4 жыл бұрын

Or am I? Veritasium music plays

@mowhmo

4 жыл бұрын

I think I really was is.

@charl2182

4 жыл бұрын

So he called his KZread channel "Michael"?

@spacegrass6632

4 жыл бұрын

@@charl2182 yeah obviously who wouldn't

Plot Twist; this is the Parallel universe where you’re doing ur best

@mcnultypride

2 жыл бұрын

Amen too that brother!! Iam actually doing my best and have a beautiful wife that gave me 2 precious boys that are the World too me... And i make very good money, plus i love my career and what i do. Iam a very happy man. I wish everyone the same, a happy life!

@ashrise

2 жыл бұрын

But my life is a bit shitty. Is that supposed to encourage me ?

@han_xiao4280

2 жыл бұрын

IMPOSSIBLE!!!

@zan7838

2 жыл бұрын

@@mcnultypride how is this possible

@RAiZEN_HiGH

2 жыл бұрын

That's inspiring and sad in the same time

We collapse certain possibilities by what we put our focus and attention on. Whatever we believe to be truth causes us to perceive that reality. I find quantum physics to be so interesting definitely makes you think more about the possibilities of life

What if the universe splitting is the force behind what we perceive as cosmic inflation and perhaps doppler shift in distant stars? What if there is no expansion outwards, what if its 'expansion' by division inward, and we are each part of this ripple.

There is also another version of professor Carroll in a parallel branch where he strongly disagrees with this theory and even wrote a book about the insanity of such a possibility

@dannywest8843

4 жыл бұрын

Depends. It may not have any probability of happening. It's not every "imaginable" scenario, just a whole bunch of them.

@BugRib

4 жыл бұрын

Danny West - Given the trillions (at the very least) of copies of himself that branch off every second, the range of possibilities-for everyone, not just Carrol-is extreme! If Many Worlds is true (and I don’t think it is), I’d say there’s a 99.99999999% chance that there’s a Sean Carrol who ate his own mother, live on national television, but only had to serve one week in prison. He then went on to cure cancer, build an interstellar spaceship in his backyard out of popsicle sticks and dog feces, then became President of the USA, before finally eating his father on national television and then giving himself a Presidential pardon. Also, this version of Sean has three eyes (all different colors), and hair growing out of his tongue. And their are literally trillions of similar Seans “out there”. The end. Oh, and he’s married to Michael Jackson, who’s still alive (and an admitted child molester) in this (series of) branch(es). The actual end.

@toasterr4238

4 жыл бұрын

@@BugRib there's some technical misconception there (certain things are just literally impossible) but I admire your creativity.

@BugRib

4 жыл бұрын

Toaster R - None of it violates the laws of physics, and I don’t see why any of it would be inconsistent with the starting conditions at the Big Bang along with quantum “randomness”. _EXTREMELY_ unlikely for any given branch, but not unlikely for 10^367 (or whatever) branches per second across the whole universe. It’s ultimately just every different arrangement of particles and atoms that is logically possible, doesn’t violate physics, and is consistent with the starting conditions. I suspect that Sean Carrol would have to admit that it’s likely a reality. (note: I’m not a physicist, and my understanding of QM is severely lacking.)

@ObjectsInMotion

4 жыл бұрын

Ryan Clark Everything humans can imagine is much broader than anything that is possible. For example, fire was required to discover iron, it is IMPOSSIBLE to have a civilization in the Iron Age that hasn’t discovered fire. Likewise, Sean Carrol HAD to have been born in the 20th century, otherwise he wouldn’t have the same parents, wouldn’t look the same, wouldn’t have the same upbringing, etc, so you couldn’t call him Sean Carrol. Likewise, curing cancer may one day REQUIRE technologies that currently don’t exist, like iron absolutely needing fire. And because of this, it may be impossible for cancer to be fully cured before the 21st century unless a significant change in history occurred (one which would make the population of people very different). In this sense, it may be PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for Sean Carrol to have cured cancer in ANY timeline, and thus no Sean Carrol exists. Just because you can’t immediately think of how something violates physics, doesn’t mean it doesn’t. And the more complex the system, the more likely it is.

Meanwhile in another universe: “Meanwhile in another universe: “2020 is a bad year””

@gelmanbegum9934

2 жыл бұрын

oof

@user-zl7gv1gh9u

2 жыл бұрын

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅈ

@fahmidarahman1572

2 жыл бұрын

Meanwhile in a another x2 lol

@muslimbeliever2616

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-zl7gv1gh9u kkkkkkk

@JO-qn8gy

2 жыл бұрын

The lion shall lie down with the lamb. In this universe the lion has become the wolf.

I think this is the most convicing argument for multiple universes I've heard so far.

Has anyone considered the possibility that the answer to wave-particle duality is in the expansion of space-time itself?

Meanwhile in a parallel universe: “Schrodingers dog”

@recepomercan

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah it’s a shame we are in the version of a universe where he chose cats.

@kennko3

3 жыл бұрын

Meanwhile in another parallel universe: “Schdoginger’s professor

@gingersasquatch94

3 жыл бұрын

Sylvester's man.

@lampposts1790

3 жыл бұрын

But how can a parallel universe or multiverse be pertaining to our individual selves or earth's happenings?

@gingersasquatch94

3 жыл бұрын

@@lampposts1790 It is a parallel version of our selves and earth's happenings? Universes which are "closer" to ours in events and physical laws are the ones we are most likely to talk about, like the idea of the central finite curve of the multiverse in Rick and Morty.

In some parallel world, I understood everything in the video. A version of me, technically. But yeah, that makes me happy

@PoopVintner

4 жыл бұрын

Vaibhav Bhootra also in a parallel universe, you are not only my mother, but also my dad and me.

@Cinn07

4 жыл бұрын

Elijah Martin and I’m the president

@palasta

4 жыл бұрын

Highly improbable.

@mrlaird

4 жыл бұрын

At least you're not the version who bought Norton AV?

@meisterunner

4 жыл бұрын

YOU only exist in one universe.

This is my explanation for universal expansion. The universe keeps making more and more copies of particles, and is growing due to lack of space. This also explains the exponential growth. More particles means faster expansion.

Do a behind the scenes vlog on how you make these animations in your videos.

This man really said “y’all not gonna clown me I got a source” I respect it so much

@shucklesors

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣 if he only knew that people 10 times smarter than you (or me) would still not know enough to begin to have a conversation at that level let alone "clown" him

@billpugh58

Жыл бұрын

I love the “probably”:) thats “real” science:) probably!

@Escxpe_21

11 ай бұрын

​​@@billpugh58 almost everything we know is a "probably". Theres nothing concrete to prove any theory still science has discorvered things about the universe our ancestors could only wish for

@truthisaquestion

11 ай бұрын

@@Escxpe_21 ... dont you mean "probably discovered"? We can't be sure that our "discoveries" are true. Logical postivists failed miserably to establish foundations.

@nameq

9 ай бұрын

By finding someone who made it his identity?

Imagine making content so cool that everyone watches, even if they understand nothing.

@weichen219

2 жыл бұрын

For that sake, even it is entirely wrong!

@AhirZamanSairi

2 жыл бұрын

@@weichen219 even _"if,"_ but yeah, totally

@AhirZamanSairi

2 жыл бұрын

@@weichen219 I saw it from the notifications but they deleted it for some reason, you can tell me the name another way maybe, I wasn't sarcastic btw, I really agree with you, all this many worlds stuff is nothing but a comedy to me, the "many worldness" exists only because of "few brainedness."

@weichen219

2 жыл бұрын

Ahir zaman sairi, understand. Just interested in the discussion.

@weichen219

2 жыл бұрын

@@AhirZamanSairi I was referring to the recent paper "heat transfer at speed of sound" on International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, October, 2021

Assuming Quantum Field Propagators, you basically take the converging order of Prod_n exp(i H(t_n) delta t) but several may converge. The mathematical problem is that the exp(- H(t_n) delta t) are NON-commutative.

Oh and a Klein bottle is shaped like a hour glass if you look at it in 4 dimensions because the tail doesn't connect it is able to reside in all possible positions

Its good to know that im having a great life in a parallel universe.

@Arunkumar-xw7oq

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah dude, our other versions are way more happier and successful.

@wezz-t812

2 жыл бұрын

you can still change your life, you know

@newtfigton8795

2 жыл бұрын

@@Arunkumar-xw7oq Don’t forget that there would be just as many universes where you have a much worse life too.

@legoboy7107

2 жыл бұрын

You can have a great life yourself you know. You just need the right Syncing Speed so you can travel the adequate number of qPUs to arrive at the parallel universe where you're having a great life.

@isabellav3232

2 жыл бұрын

parent trap 😳

It’s funny I never thought about the fact that it didn’t have to be a cat being killed in Schrodinger’s example. He just as easily could have had the hammer fall and crack a walnut or something, and the walnut is both crushed and uncrushed until you open the box... but he chose it to be poison killing a cat. He must have been a dog person.

@dominicdeluca6378

3 жыл бұрын

He may have been taking the sentience of the cat into consideration

@sebastianrobleto2181

3 жыл бұрын

Scrodinger’s nuts? Smh

@daniels.5631

3 жыл бұрын

@@sebastianrobleto2181 best comment xD

@vixxcelacea2778

3 жыл бұрын

Actually the reason for the experiment was to prove that things like this do not matter on our macro-scale. The cat being alive or not is irrelevant to us because we have no control of knowing. The cat is either alive or dead whether we observe or not. Us not knowing doesn't change reality itself, only our knowledge of it. It's the same with the still brought up double split experiment. The reason that the it changed from waves and particles is not because of our observation, but that we need light to observe. Our observation was and is irrelevant. Schrodinger's cat thought experiments set to prove the same thing. On our macro scale, it doesn't matter, we don't affect the universe's laws of physics and our knowing doesn't change reality.

@winstonsmith11

3 жыл бұрын

@@vixxcelacea2778 So basically we can't know, because our way of "knowing" is a construct of human consciuosness that can't accurately conceive or perceive objective reality? Maybe? Here I am trying to understand, which is probably, by definition, impossible.

I can confirm what these individuals are talking about in real life. As a strong swimmer I got trapped in a vertical whirlpool (low head dam) and was drowned. Saw the obits. in the local paper about the drowned teen. Saw the funeral with everyone grieving, Yet I crawled out of that river and resumed a life similar but not the same as when I entered. I met the guidelines for entanglement and the rest. I am here today after I dropped a building on myself in another incident. My head and torso was flattened to the ground by a steel beam and after digging myself out with one free hand, being seen, walked out of the hospital after a team thought I was gone, the same day! We live in parallel reality. As carbon based organisms our senses can only perceive a limited concept of the number of dimensions that exist, and have rudimentary tools for measurement.

I actually find it hard to believe how this could NOT be true. What would be the fundamental difference between two electrons colliding and becoming entangled and a photon being detected by some machine that displays the result?

"My book is both available and not availabe at fine bookstores everywhere"

@NBNJNB_

3 жыл бұрын

and nowhere

@34cvc

3 жыл бұрын

What a nerd joke. I love it

@sonyjapan565

3 жыл бұрын

Ok

@Kiridan.

3 жыл бұрын

Same as RTX 3080.

@knightryder4021

3 жыл бұрын

@@Kiridan. lol 🤣

"You have to remember that the whole idea of branching, is just a human convenience." I think this statement is an important thing to communicate for people to even begin to understand concepts like this. We as humans have to use our limited experience of the universe to apply reason to stuff that is outside our area of comprehension. We can't comprehend scale without a frame of reference for example. You can say the sun is 93 million miles away, but if you don't scale that down to something small enough to understand (like the distance from Chicago to New York), you might as well make up a number because it's impossible to picture that. What we describe as "multiple worlds" with near infinite possibilities where everything we could have done has has happened, is really just us creating a frame of reference to understand it. It isn't the reality of how it works, it's just a way to comprehend it.

@michaelking8391

4 жыл бұрын

You sound really clever, like you understand very well the subject you are talking about. Even if that subject is fictional

@circuit10

4 жыл бұрын

@@michaelking8391 It's not fictional

@MeatBunFul

4 жыл бұрын

My head hurts

@ForwardSynthesis

4 жыл бұрын

I think when you describe something as multiple worlds or universes that just leads to more confusion among laymen. The pop science imagination will always interpret this as meaning there is a literal extra space containing infinite copies of the same stuff only slightly different that we can "science" our way into by opening some exotic technobabble door in reality.

@grayish9150

4 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/Z4GCq5Z8Yca4Z9o.html

Might be crazy… but this always makes me think of video game optimization. “If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it does it make a sound. In a video game if no one is around if will just load what was supposed to happen when we go check. Like in skyblock if you are farming potatoes it grows a certain amount in a day but if you leave the game runs a calculation for how many SHOULD be there. Waves functions and the tree noise problem sounds just like video game rules to me.

Simplified: Individual photons exist everywhere simultaneously. Photons are the smallest units of matter which make up everything in the Universe. We exist everywhere simultaneously which means every choice/decision we’ve decided on has actually happened creating separate timelines of what we know as reality. This is the foundational concept of parallel universes. Yes, it’s suppose to not make sense.

Me before: Oh that's a cool thumbnail Me after: Ah yes, the superposition of the atomic particles due to Schrödinger's equation and the wave function cause the splitting of the universe

@Keno_jm

4 жыл бұрын

5Head :wine_glass: AH YES

@rvrwest

4 жыл бұрын

Ying and Yang

@Mau365PP

4 жыл бұрын

AHHHHHH 🤤🤤🤤🤤🤤 YAAAAASSSSSS 🧠💪👌💯💯💯🤓😺

@deathrex007

4 жыл бұрын

@@Keno_jm *enslaved wave function*