Original and appellate advisory special leave jurisdiction of Supreme Court

Some people question that writ jurisdiction( Part-III) is not original- in this case pl see the observations of apex court in I.R. Coelho (Dead) By Lrs vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors wherein it is stated- The Fundamental Rights Chapter was incorporated providing in detail the positive and negative rights. It provided for the protection of various rights and freedoms. For enforcement of these rights, unlike Constitutions of most of the other countries, the Supreme Court was vested with original jurisdiction as contained in Article 32.
This lecture deals with writ( which in a way is also original), original ( other than writ), appellate ( covering constitutional matters, civil and criminal both) , advisory and also special leave jurisdiction of Supreme Court. An attempt has been made to simplify the matter but the content is directly taken from the text of the constitution.

Пікірлер: 39

  • @mylawsavvy6697
    @mylawsavvy66973 жыл бұрын

    Just now only I got this channel. Thanks sir. 👌very much helpful..for my law exam. A class from a great person especially for whom needs class n English.

  • @sarabilabegum8796
    @sarabilabegum87962 жыл бұрын

    Thank you sir for you teaching

  • @mnkeshavamnkeshava4372
    @mnkeshavamnkeshava43724 жыл бұрын

    U r great sir u have not any new instrument but also u r providing lectures

  • @lalitadityabehera867
    @lalitadityabehera8673 жыл бұрын

    Outstanding method sir ! Thank you very much

  • @neeshaacharya_
    @neeshaacharya_4 жыл бұрын

    A very nice video made ........ All concepts regarding the topic cleared......thanks a lot sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @dineshrockzz4428
    @dineshrockzz44282 жыл бұрын

    Happy to see a very good teacher!! fully understand # thank you!

  • @saedaktar3971
    @saedaktar3971 Жыл бұрын

    Sir u r a gem

  • @aaromalajith5832
    @aaromalajith58323 жыл бұрын

    Great sir Thank you . You made it real easy 😊

  • @chandanyadav-oy3pd
    @chandanyadav-oy3pd4 жыл бұрын

    Thanks a lot sr all doubts cleared

  • @abhinandanaski8380
    @abhinandanaski83803 жыл бұрын

    Tq sir u cleared my doubts😊

  • @thanksncert2422
    @thanksncert24223 жыл бұрын

    Excellent sir With simply manner

  • @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for valuable feedback.

  • @prakashs8150
    @prakashs81505 жыл бұрын

    Thanks you Sir.....

  • @chidambharswaroop8260
    @chidambharswaroop82604 жыл бұрын

    Thank you Sir

  • @wetalks9166
    @wetalks91663 жыл бұрын

    content is highly useful. Please Cover Polity topics. They will help upsc candidates

  • @IndianpolitybyYKumar
    @IndianpolitybyYKumar2 жыл бұрын

    Some people question that writ jurisdiction( Part-III) is not original- in this case pl see the observations of apex court in I.R. Coelho (Dead) By Lrs vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors wherein it is stated- The Fundamental Rights Chapter was incorporated providing in detail the positive and negative rights. It provided for the protection of various rights and freedoms. For enforcement of these rights, unlike Constitutions of most of the other countries, the Supreme Court was vested with original jurisdiction as contained in Article 32.

  • @yashvanthns3933
    @yashvanthns39334 жыл бұрын

    Thanks

  • @angelicangel846
    @angelicangel8465 жыл бұрын

    English is so good..☺️

  • @AbdulSattar-fn1vn
    @AbdulSattar-fn1vn3 жыл бұрын

    wonderful explanation with such conceptual clarity !! please continue to make such videos

  • @sushantkumar4255
    @sushantkumar42553 жыл бұрын

    Ur lecture is summary of jn pandey's book

  • @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    3 жыл бұрын

    It may be a coincidence!

  • @archnamankar6677
    @archnamankar66774 жыл бұрын

    Classic teacher! So Good to see on KZread. Thank you sir.

  • @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for valuable feedback.

  • @wetalks9166
    @wetalks91663 жыл бұрын

    keep uploading.

  • @sowndharyavenkatesanv2791
    @sowndharyavenkatesanv27913 жыл бұрын

    Thank you sir for this valuable lecture...we request you to give some tips on mains descriptive writing and how to approach that question !

  • @venkateshkumarvenkateshkum3762
    @venkateshkumarvenkateshkum37624 жыл бұрын

    Super 👌👌👌👌👌👌👌 sir

  • @Kkartik008
    @Kkartik0086 жыл бұрын

    Nice

  • @gaaraofddarkness
    @gaaraofddarkness2 жыл бұрын

    Sir you did not tell about Art 142..SC can do complete justice wala

  • @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yes, it was left out . You are correct.

  • @karan-gi8pl
    @karan-gi8pl3 жыл бұрын

    Sir, fiscal federalism is not a part of original jurisdiction??

  • @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    3 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant question. Pl see DD Basu chapter on Finance Commission

  • @sayasargam
    @sayasargam4 жыл бұрын

    To add 142 curative petition//137- review petition- also president election disputes

  • @priyaagrahari6804
    @priyaagrahari68045 жыл бұрын

    Sir poore u tube channel me constitutiona ke subjects bhoot km. Ablable hai so please ap Hindi me praya kijie taki hm sb ko v benefit mil pay

  • @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for valuable feedback.

  • @swadhin9020
    @swadhin90205 жыл бұрын

    Sir can a Indian who has abolished his citizenship and taken a citizenship of Australia file slp?

  • @rizwanmahadi9507

    @rizwanmahadi9507

    4 жыл бұрын

    Supreme court SLP only speeking orders dismissed. This orders after hc is set aside in Writ Appeal now i want to go sc sir allow notice in SLP now this Stig.

  • @ashwinvalvai4865
    @ashwinvalvai48653 жыл бұрын

    Original jurisdiction of sc does not include fundamental rights

  • @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    3 жыл бұрын

    Pl read-main.sci.gov.in/jurisdiction( - Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court The Supreme Court has original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction. Its exclusive original jurisdiction extends to any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States or between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more States on the other or between two or more States, if and insofar as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or of fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends. In addition, Article 32 of the Constitution gives an extensive original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court in regard to enforcement of Fundamental Rights. See the word ORIGINAL jurisdiction in last two lines. The power to issue writ for enforcement of fundamental rights under article 32 of apex court is neither appellate nor advisory? Pl try to see in terms of three broad classifications. Powers to issue writs,directions,orders,etc can be sub classified or categorised,as the case may be, into one of the three BROAD categories ,viz, original, appellate and advisory.

  • @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    @IndianpolitybyYKumar

    2 жыл бұрын

    pl also see the observations of apex court in I.R. Coelho (Dead) By Lrs vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors wherein it is stated- The Fundamental Rights Chapter was incorporated providing in detail the positive and negative rights. It provided for the protection of various rights and freedoms. For enforcement of these rights, unlike Constitutions of most of the other countries, the Supreme Court was vested with original jurisdiction as contained in Article 32.

Келесі