Original and appellate advisory special leave jurisdiction of Supreme Court
Some people question that writ jurisdiction( Part-III) is not original- in this case pl see the observations of apex court in I.R. Coelho (Dead) By Lrs vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors wherein it is stated- The Fundamental Rights Chapter was incorporated providing in detail the positive and negative rights. It provided for the protection of various rights and freedoms. For enforcement of these rights, unlike Constitutions of most of the other countries, the Supreme Court was vested with original jurisdiction as contained in Article 32.
This lecture deals with writ( which in a way is also original), original ( other than writ), appellate ( covering constitutional matters, civil and criminal both) , advisory and also special leave jurisdiction of Supreme Court. An attempt has been made to simplify the matter but the content is directly taken from the text of the constitution.
Пікірлер: 39
Just now only I got this channel. Thanks sir. 👌very much helpful..for my law exam. A class from a great person especially for whom needs class n English.
Thank you sir for you teaching
U r great sir u have not any new instrument but also u r providing lectures
Outstanding method sir ! Thank you very much
A very nice video made ........ All concepts regarding the topic cleared......thanks a lot sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Happy to see a very good teacher!! fully understand # thank you!
Sir u r a gem
Great sir Thank you . You made it real easy 😊
Thanks a lot sr all doubts cleared
Tq sir u cleared my doubts😊
Excellent sir With simply manner
@IndianpolitybyYKumar
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for valuable feedback.
Thanks you Sir.....
Thank you Sir
content is highly useful. Please Cover Polity topics. They will help upsc candidates
Some people question that writ jurisdiction( Part-III) is not original- in this case pl see the observations of apex court in I.R. Coelho (Dead) By Lrs vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors wherein it is stated- The Fundamental Rights Chapter was incorporated providing in detail the positive and negative rights. It provided for the protection of various rights and freedoms. For enforcement of these rights, unlike Constitutions of most of the other countries, the Supreme Court was vested with original jurisdiction as contained in Article 32.
Thanks
English is so good..☺️
wonderful explanation with such conceptual clarity !! please continue to make such videos
Ur lecture is summary of jn pandey's book
@IndianpolitybyYKumar
3 жыл бұрын
It may be a coincidence!
Classic teacher! So Good to see on KZread. Thank you sir.
@IndianpolitybyYKumar
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for valuable feedback.
keep uploading.
Thank you sir for this valuable lecture...we request you to give some tips on mains descriptive writing and how to approach that question !
Super 👌👌👌👌👌👌👌 sir
Nice
Sir you did not tell about Art 142..SC can do complete justice wala
@IndianpolitybyYKumar
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, it was left out . You are correct.
Sir, fiscal federalism is not a part of original jurisdiction??
@IndianpolitybyYKumar
3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant question. Pl see DD Basu chapter on Finance Commission
To add 142 curative petition//137- review petition- also president election disputes
Sir poore u tube channel me constitutiona ke subjects bhoot km. Ablable hai so please ap Hindi me praya kijie taki hm sb ko v benefit mil pay
@IndianpolitybyYKumar
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for valuable feedback.
Sir can a Indian who has abolished his citizenship and taken a citizenship of Australia file slp?
@rizwanmahadi9507
4 жыл бұрын
Supreme court SLP only speeking orders dismissed. This orders after hc is set aside in Writ Appeal now i want to go sc sir allow notice in SLP now this Stig.
Original jurisdiction of sc does not include fundamental rights
@IndianpolitybyYKumar
3 жыл бұрын
Pl read-main.sci.gov.in/jurisdiction( - Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court The Supreme Court has original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction. Its exclusive original jurisdiction extends to any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States or between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more States on the other or between two or more States, if and insofar as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or of fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends. In addition, Article 32 of the Constitution gives an extensive original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court in regard to enforcement of Fundamental Rights. See the word ORIGINAL jurisdiction in last two lines. The power to issue writ for enforcement of fundamental rights under article 32 of apex court is neither appellate nor advisory? Pl try to see in terms of three broad classifications. Powers to issue writs,directions,orders,etc can be sub classified or categorised,as the case may be, into one of the three BROAD categories ,viz, original, appellate and advisory.
@IndianpolitybyYKumar
2 жыл бұрын
pl also see the observations of apex court in I.R. Coelho (Dead) By Lrs vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors wherein it is stated- The Fundamental Rights Chapter was incorporated providing in detail the positive and negative rights. It provided for the protection of various rights and freedoms. For enforcement of these rights, unlike Constitutions of most of the other countries, the Supreme Court was vested with original jurisdiction as contained in Article 32.