A President could just say murdering a political opponent was in the best interest of the country. Pretty much what Putin does. And we’re having a debate about this? Really?

@tboyer86

9 күн бұрын

All I'm saying is if the supreme Court rules that presidents are allowed to do that Biden needs to do us a serious solid.

@nukerzerothefirst3417

9 күн бұрын

the world is watching the USA implode, It is no longer viewed as a Global leader scholastically , Trump has helped that view enormously

@bradhombre6912

9 күн бұрын

Forget a "political opponent". What about a justice of the Supreme Court?

@RobBCactive

9 күн бұрын

Somebody should point out to SCOTUS that corrupt judges who gerrymander the law in ridiculous convoluted partisan interpretations would be in play too!

@lindacollier593

9 күн бұрын

Public act, Private act, Official act, Criminal act!!! Charles is right. The CRIMINAL element can't be left out of the equation, because that's the heart of the matter here..."Does the President have absolute immunity from Criminal matters/acts?"

I think the USA is completely insane to even entertain this insane idea. Yes, the world is not just laughing - WE ARE DISGUSTED!!!

@kenc7120

9 күн бұрын

Y’all should do a We are the World fundraiser for 18 wheeler Brandon

@mostmost1

9 күн бұрын

The republican Supreme court judges are the insane ones. A few of them even don't believe this mess to entertain it.

@danmarino711

9 күн бұрын

It's was a criminal treasonous act by Trump to grab power illegally.

@JoeBrown-zq9pn

9 күн бұрын

Aman!!

@romulus_

9 күн бұрын

many of us feel the same way. shambolic situation here. remember: three of the current justices helped deliver the presidency to g.w. bush when they acted as his lawyers. they've been anti-democratic for years and years. they staked their careers on these dubious opinions and legal maneuvers.

You have to love that they have to discuss what is blatantly obvious to everyone else EXCEPT the "justice" system.

@darthtechnologies553

9 күн бұрын

Why should we the people continue to follow laws? They must want anarchy

@danmarino711

9 күн бұрын

It's was a criminal treasonous act by Trump to grab power illegally.

@pauloicto8252

9 күн бұрын

Well, Trump OWNS the justice system.

It's a shame Scotus is even entertaining this case

@Mitsoxfan

9 күн бұрын

They are hack schills for Trump. Morons, all of them. Democracy is officially dead.

@What_do_I_Think

9 күн бұрын

It just shows, how dysfunctional and AGAINST the Constitution it has become.

@chuckhall5347

9 күн бұрын

Yes and slow walking it past the election.

@arielepouhe80

9 күн бұрын

No it's not. Even the justice department lawyer admitted there was nuance to this that needs to be worked out by the court

@DementiaDon

9 күн бұрын

@@arielepouhe80 The lower court decision was more than good enough. This was all purely about delaying for Trump.

I really love how we are beholden to these doofuses to tell us what a crime is.

@edl6398

9 күн бұрын

For their entire lifetimes!!!

@akrenwinkle

9 күн бұрын

I believe the plural of doofus is doofi.

These Justices might as well be grade school kids fighting over the rules of kickball. They aren't qualified to decide even that.

@JoeBrown-zq9pn

9 күн бұрын

You got that right ✅️

@oh_my-ge3eu

9 күн бұрын

And yet here you are whinning about it on yt... sit down 😂

We don't need new laws that make presidents immune from criminal prosecution. Criminals face consequences for their crimes, that's the law.

@chrissorensen9511

9 күн бұрын

I agree. Would you hold Bill Clinton, Barak Obama, Bush Jr., Mike Pence and Joe Biden to the same standard?!

@outtaredzhead4441

9 күн бұрын

​@chrissorensen9511 of course. Case in point, Bill Clinton's impeachment was bipartisan.

@James-gq4tb

9 күн бұрын

@@chrissorensen9511 If there is enough strong evidence to sustain a guilty verdict through the numerous processes that such evidence must go through in our justice system, then yes…. By all means. Bring on the charges

@johnnydropkicks

9 күн бұрын

@@chrissorensen9511 Yes. Isn’t that logical? If you have an argument against that, I’d love to hear it.

@chrissorensen9511

9 күн бұрын

@@outtaredzhead4441 …and the House impeached Clinton and the Senate failed to convict…just as it was planned.

The supreme court justices should be ashamed for agreeing to hear this case. There should be no question that the president is not above the law. Any other decision should be grounds for impeaching the justices

@MarkSmith-pb2ly

9 күн бұрын

No immunity and no time limit for charges? Okay, the following President's will need to be charged next: 1) Joe Biden's for treason, for ignoring immigration laws, corruption and money laundering. 2) Obama for war criminal and for what he did with those underage children on Jeffrey's Island and at Diddy's house parties. 3) Both Clinton's and Bush to the list, there should be no time limit on what they did.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

What has DJT been convicted of...?

@MarkSmith-pb2ly

9 күн бұрын

@@JohnPublic-dk7zd John, these Biden activist have no idea, they just follow and shout whatever the MSM tells them.

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

@@JohnPublic-dk7zd Hasn't been, YET..!

They're going to hold off making a decision - watch. This is ridiculous.

@guybeingaguy

9 күн бұрын

Just so you know they ALWAYS release rulings end of June. This ruling may not be in that batch, it may though. Perfectly normal. They can do it before June, you never know. Trump spent a lot of money to install his judges. Let’s see if they are loyal or not.

@barryg4927

9 күн бұрын

They’re a joke

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

It will turn out to be the delay tactic as that was all he could afford. No one could ever pay them enough to give him or anyone total immunity. It would be self defeating, as then the court wouldn't be needed anymore per dictator doctrine.

I've lost all respect for the supreme court. time for a change

@oh_my-ge3eu

9 күн бұрын

Why because you may not agree with what they decide.... grow up

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

@@oh_my-ge3eu Go back to Siberia Boris Badinov.

The fact that they even listen to Donald's BS is embarassing.

So, throwing out the whole basis of the American Republic just to get one two-bit shyster out of a legal jam......

@melissamorton1282

9 күн бұрын

Out of several legal jams he put himself in by breaking the law.

Praying that Trump is accountable

@What_do_I_Think

9 күн бұрын

He is. The other question is, if any human court will hold him accountable. Many dictators and bad guys just escaped scot-free, because humans would not holding them accountable .... particularly of course right-wing dictators.

@K-Dash02

9 күн бұрын

Praying that the Left is held accountable as well

@darthtechnologies553

9 күн бұрын

See how corrupt Republicans are now. No Republican can never be trusted again. They will lie, cheat or steal their way to power and control

@avet4521

9 күн бұрын

​@@K-Dash02 OK, the entire left? What crime could every liberal have possibly committed? Or is this because u don't like them?

@patriots6552

9 күн бұрын

😂I’m praying for NOV 5 sleepy gotta go

The Supreme Court decision should be 9-0 in favor of no immunity if the Justices adhere to the constitution. If Nixon was immune, he wouldn't have needed to be pardoned. Clause 7 states, "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law." Any judge who dissents, needs to be impeached and removed for failing to uphold their oath of office.

@grandcalia8988

9 күн бұрын

Kavanaugh actually opined that Ford's pardon of Nixon has been proven over time to have been the correct decision. Seriously? Had Nixon been forced to answer for his criminal behavior, there would be no discussion on presidential criminality in regards to Trump!

@pamelacassise9069

9 күн бұрын

I agree 100%. Any Justice who gives Trump a nod should not be on any court.

@guybeingaguy

9 күн бұрын

Trump installed them. You’re naive on how stuff works.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

I was in high school when Watergate came down...the politicians were every bit as crooked then as they are today...when the pardon was granted people howled, for about a week...then things pretty much went back to the everyday humdrum...Nixon was never impeached, but the house did vote to begin the proceedings, as I recall...

@e.sharmer2057

9 күн бұрын

That’s right!!!

Just pathetic this is even being entertained to any degree.

@barryg4927

9 күн бұрын

Lower circuit already called this correctly. This is horrible

Does it matter if it's private or public if it's illegal? Lol I'm pretty sure that the president isn't allowed to break the law!

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

Don't be naive.

This should be an open and shut case, but Clarence Thomas is on the Supreme Court.

@reneej7241

9 күн бұрын

Clarence Thomas never should have been on the Supreme Court. As a young black female watching that Anita case, I felt violated. As an older black female watching him take kick backs and gifts…. He belongs behind bars!

@johnmeyler7402

9 күн бұрын

Ol’ Dead eye is a psychopath

@grandcalia8988

9 күн бұрын

Add lapdog Alito and Kavanaugh to your list.

@porobotboyxxx

9 күн бұрын

@@reneej7241 He’s a real Uncle Ruckus.

@porobotboyxxx

9 күн бұрын

@@johnmeyler7402 That would be a compliment to him at this point.

If they decide to grant presidential immunity, it's time for Dark Brandon to take over.

Unbelievable, our justice system is a joke!!!!!

Private Act: When I close the door before I poop. Public Act: When Trump poops his pants in a courtroom.

@ProulxS

9 күн бұрын

Question is private vs official, not public. He poop his pants in public but that doesn't make it an official act. It's still an act he does on his own, for his own reason that are not linked to his official acts. He's just too full of it to hold it in.

@robertodebeers2551

9 күн бұрын

@@ProulxS Excellent distinction. PS. I just pooped my pants.

@ProulxS

9 күн бұрын

@@robertodebeers2551 I'll assume in private but then you made it public. Is it still a private thing then? Doesn't matter the subject of the matter in your pants is still not official matter :)

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

@@ProulxS That's good.

We’re in trouble if they didn’t all write their decisions well before this in the last 7 1/2 freaking weeks

Justice is defined as the law being applied equally to all individuals. This should not be going to the Supreme court.

There was no cogent reason for the SCOTUS to entertain this appeal from Trump. The appeal court decision was sufficient. The conservative justices are looking for a way to help Trump, otherwise this is just unbelievable.

@MarkSmith-pb2ly

9 күн бұрын

No immunity and no time limit for charges? The following President's will need to be charged next: 1) Joe Biden's for treason, for ignoring immigration laws, corruption and money laundering. 2) Obama for war criminal and for what he did with those underage children on Jeffrey's Island and at Diddy's house parties. 3) Both Clinton's and Bush to the list, there should be no time limit on what they did.

The presidential duties do not include ignoring everybody who tells you that you lost an election.

Never trump again. Vote blue.

@shawngouza139

9 күн бұрын

Puke

Noboby is Above the Law .Supreme Court do your Job Rite ....

Why …. WHY IS THOMAS ON THIS CASE?!?!!!!! Come ON!!!!

Couldn't agree more! HISTORIC -- as an ordinary citizen, the hearing gave me chills!

This so so important!!! We need protection from any President who thinks they are above the law and they can target people they criticized him or offended him in any way.

@MarkSmith-pb2ly

9 күн бұрын

No immunity and no time limit for charges? Okay, the following President's will need to be charged next: 1) Joe Biden's for treason, for ignoring immigration laws, corruption and money laundering. 2) Obama for war criminal and for what he did with those underage children on Jeffrey's Island and at Diddy's house parties. 3) Both Clinton's and Bush to the list, there should be no time limit on what they did.

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

*if they criticized him..!!! Proofread, Grammar and Spell check please, people.

I saw red this morning when I was listening to Clarence Thomas. He should have immediately recused himself.

Better to lean toward limiting Presidential power. Criminal power.

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

Better to limit Presidential Power, than giving them Power to be Criminal, any day of their term.

God bless the regular Americans who are just trying to live they have to pay for this too.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

We've been paying through the nose since the puppet was installed...

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

@@JohnPublic-dk7zd ?? Trumpuppets ??

SCOTUS is slow stepping this to provide appearance of fair adjudication. However, given the politics it reads & feels more like favoritism by providing Trump, who appointed some, a de facto stay or delay until after the election re: Jan. 6 pending criminal trial case. This is, in my opinion, not only unfair to the public but an unconstitutional action as it’s a failure to uphold their oath of office.

Bad behavior should not be rewarded.

“In my administration, I’m going to enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information. NO ONE WILL BE ABOVE THE LAW” -Trump August 16, 2016

It doesn’t even have to be a consequential case because they should’ve never heard it in the first place

It shouldn’t matter if it’s a public or private act. No act should be immune. A president SHOULD be afraid of prosecution if they violate the law just as we all are. There is no official act that requires a president to break the law. there is no slippery slope in allowing presidents to be held accountable. There is no such thing as a political prosecution to the extent Trump is arguing because a president can only ever be held accountable if there is actually evidence of a crime. You need evidence to convince a grand jury to issue an indictment. You need evidence to avoid the case being thrown out by a judge. You need evidence for a jury to hand down a guilty verdict. You need evidence to avoid an appeals court overturning the verdict. there is no scenario where anyone can target their political opponents with the justice system and get away with it in our country despite the Supreme Court claiming to be concerned about it happening. there is a reason every other court has rejected this argument.

@barryg4927

9 күн бұрын

AMEN!!!!

@lawnchair4474

9 күн бұрын

WORD

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

Actually, you are almost correct...but, every president, from Washington to the current installed puppet, has blood on their hands...comes with the job...the office has to have immunity, or the country is eventually doomed...if the president is acting so bad, impeach, find guilty, and remove...there is no worse punishment to one in power than taking that power away...you're being played...

How can committing a crime be part of your official duties when you're sworn to uphold the law?

Treason is Treason! Whether it’s official or private!

Total immunity and the power of pardon. What could go wrong with that plan.

Relying on norms and values is simplistically foolish in a country that ostensibly functions under the rule of law, not men. Relying on norms and values--essentially the honor system--is an open, easily exploited, invitation to criminals.

No one have 100% immunity Donald Trump.

@trishbrown2297

9 күн бұрын

Under this system...HE might.

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

@@trishbrown2297 It just can't be or happen, it's way too anti-civilized, even to think it. We would have to do something about it if they were to decide that way, How many agree..?

A crime committed is a crime committed. It doesn't matter if it was a "private" or "public" act.

@benedibrava

9 күн бұрын

not when it comes to usa presidnet obama even used drone against americans created wars w/o consent from congress spied on trump when will you guys wake up, trump is the innocent one

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

What crime...?

Biden should take out trump.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

Careful what you wish for...

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

@@JohnPublic-dk7zd Why, who's wishing here..?

If Trump's acts were 'official' and legal, why all the secrecy, covert meetings, etc.? Why angry his calls were recorded?

I doubt that the eventual decision of the SCOTUS was bring clarity to the issue of presidential immunity. This is messy and confusing.

When I see the replacement image for that video here, I see two pictures of shame!

Speaking of lack of credibility - Did Thomas recuse himself or was he out on the boat with Harlan Crow ?

Any politician who sees an opponent as the "enemy" is definitely a faulty unit.

Charles made the only statement that matters to this severe issue. The fact that the supreme court’s discussion with the parties of this proceeding never stated the fact of this case. And that is the fact that the federal department of justice has brought this case using the same legal framework as it uses to prosecute any other individual with criminal acts that have broken any laws that we’re governed under! The court has no jurisdiction to interfere in any criminal prosecutions that have not occurred before a court of law that has ruled on the issue! If no trial has been conducted that has come to some conclusion to assure that the defendant was ever held accountable!! This is not a fair and reasonable prosecution of a criminal offense that is conducted in the same manner that has been made in any prior court proceedings!! And the Supreme Court has created a miscarriage of justice that has significantly compromised our nation and the judicial branch of being equally fair when it comes to protecting political and powerful individuals!

@lawnchair4474

9 күн бұрын

Right On. You nailed it. Solid

We all know what the court is going to do. We will be outraged

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

The communist democrats will be outraged...who cares...

SC will give him the biggest grift yet. He will now be able to mentally declassify and market "classified" documents

What we have is a court that is beholding on the plaintiff for their appointments, so we might see some bias here?

How the heck did 44 other Presidents ever manage? Seriously, we need a new law to pardon this crook? Vote 💙💙💙💙 and send the MAGots packing! This is the most shameful case the Extreme Court has ever entertained.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

Y'all are being played...

@DemoCatMan

9 күн бұрын

It wouldn't be about pardons, it would be about creating the first US dictator.

I'm feeling like the time has come for legal professionals, professors, legal journalists, et al, to explain to the public the process for impeaching a SCOTUS justice. The case of Clarence Thomas is long overdue for scrutiny, and perhaps Alito, not only for relying on opinions and statements so old that they can only be described as obscure, antiquated, and irrelevant, in addition to plain old shameless corruption on the parts of both.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

Move the goalposts, huh...typical communist Democrat nonsense...if you don't like the rules you are free to move to Russia...

The Supreme Court did not need to spend one second on this.

Frankly if SCOTUS agrees with the great orange blot about his immunity right than they may as well leave that court hang up their robes, take their great pensions and walk out locking the doors to the halls of Justice behind them. It is the death blow for justice in America.

He probably already paid Thomas off anyway….anyhow!😂😂😂

Crazy other courts and been many deny,rule against say he doesn't have absolute power!! But the supreme Court hears the argument crazy it's a no brainer

"Magistrates"???

Does it have to be unanimous?

@michaeldiogenesbest6127

9 күн бұрын

No......

Even if we accepted Sauer's premise that a coup is not an illegal act, how could you possibly argue that it's an official act?

IFThe SCOUS DECIDES TO take their time, they should be ready to give a good reason to the American people as to why! ⚓️🇺🇸

This seems like a easy question don't know why it would take weeks to make a decision this is the Supreme Court they should know the answer already

The essential question is: Is the US similar to Russia, similar to North Korea, similar to Venezuela? If the answer is No, then clearly there can be no presidential immunity.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

You have no clue...

@VA-lo4ul

8 күн бұрын

@@JohnPublic-dk7zd Actually, yes I do.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

8 күн бұрын

@@VA-lo4ul we will have to disagree...

@VA-lo4ul

8 күн бұрын

@@JohnPublic-dk7zd Fine by me.

the Supreme Court rules on whether the president is immune because of his office. but they (willingly)forget he is immune because he can just make them delay.

Getting stupid By the Day!! Wow! What are they're talking about? 💯 B.S.

This is beyond ridiculous. I have rights too! I deserve to know what he did, regardless of immunity or not!! The Supreme Court needs to release the stay, let the trial proceed so that American citizens have the transparency they need to vote in November. I am so BS! What about my rights??????

... Meanwhile,, back in the real world, 4 indictments and 91 charges and climbing...

The Court will bounce the ball back to the lower court and don't be too surprised if there's a further attempt to bounce it back to the Supreme Court again. The game is obvious as day.

@benedibrava

9 күн бұрын

so much hate in you seek God

@YTPartyTonight

9 күн бұрын

@@benedibrava Pure projection.

@lawnchair4474

9 күн бұрын

​@@benedibravayou first blaah puke

The delay SCOTUS is creating is a form of giving comfort and support to an insurrectionist. For that the SCOTUS can be indicted.

Trump is unstoppable. Mad respect 👍

This is not a public or private act - its an illegal act who’s basis is sedition.

I am well aware that our Supreme Court leans more right than left. I believe that in order for the justices to reach a fair presidential "absolute immunity" conclusion, they should more closely evaluate the balance of power of the Executive, the Legislative, and the Judicial branches of U. S. Government. If any one president is granted legal, absolute immunity, that opens up a tsunami of flood gates that we have never seen before, and it will surely imbalance the powers that presently govern the United States because the president could, and would, do whatever he pleases because he/she would have more power than the other 2 branches of government. Therefore, I believe that the president is NOT above the laws of the land. I am not a lawyer, but I am voicing my 2 cents as a concerned citizen. USA 🇺🇸 It does not take legal scholars to understand this issue. The argument of "absolute immunity" is most definitely a no-brainer, and it is a waste of taxpayers' dollars.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

Any president that truly acts that bad would be impeached, found guilty, and removed from office...it would be 100% legal, no questions asked...the problem here is the communist democrats ran two (2) bogus impeachments that failed to find the president guilty of anything...that y'all drink the koolade, believe whatever you're told, is not evidence of any wrongdoing on DJT's part...go figure...

Merrick Garland, where were you for about two years that 2024 looks like this?

Subject: Landscaper Cad Pap SCOTUS Anagram: Superpac Podcast Scandal

Idiocracy 😮

OUR SUPREME COURT IS A SHAM AND SHAME.... SHOULD HAVE REJECTED THIS CASE.. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW INCLUDING DONALD TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Supreme Court too.Political needs to be done away.Wait can not act according to law just political bias

The idea that our president would have absolute freedom to do whatever he wants and no repercussions is crazy. Absolutely ridiculous

Who is America?? Can't ask America cause apparently they don't know who they are anymore

I find this insulting 😊

A packed Supreme Court is now King Maker. I pray it doesn't happen.

When President Trump took office and McConnell served as Senate majority leader, Trump had more than 100 vacancies to fill in the lower courts, including 17 in the U.S. courts of appeals - all of them lifetime appointments. The Supreme Court hears around 80 cases a year, while the courts of appeals handle tens of thousands of cases annually - often making them the last word in most cases that impact the lives of Americans. “[McConnell] has calculated, correctly, that most of the most contentious issues in our society eventually wind up in the courts,” conservative columnist and author Mona Charen told FRONTLINE in a 2023 interview for McConnell, the GOP & the Court. “It is critical, if you want certain outcomes, to be sure that you have the right mix of judges.” We must vote NO to Trump.

The SCOTUS questions to me, were asked in such a way as to establish a zero chance of immunity. The questions felt like they were asking, so I am telling you the President has a right to meddle in elections, but you are saying the Constitution says States are the only entity that has that right to decide election rules is that correct?

If the Court were to establish a precedent of absolute presidential immunity for crimes committed during office, how would it ensure the safety and independence of the judiciary, especially if such immunity extends to acts of violence against justices themselves?

This discussion inside the Supreme Court would have been perfectly acceptable if we were not watching a criminal trial against the guy now claiming that he was covered by presidential immunity when he committed many of the crimes he is being accused of.

Show me where Immunity is in the Constitution?

@benedibrava

9 күн бұрын

immunity would be determined by supreme court also constitution doesnt say, president doesnt have immunity obama, bush, clinton... is wanted for war crimes but they are usa presidents, they have immunity

@MarkSmith-pb2ly

9 күн бұрын

@@benedibrava Correct.

Our country is truly broken 😞

@james-rd4dq

9 күн бұрын

Yes to a point, but will say the justice system sure is broken

Trump is fighting for President Biden's immunity in front of the Supreme Court too. 😂

@notyourroad

9 күн бұрын

Biden doesn't want or need it.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

These sheeple don't realize that...

@countrygirl3109

9 күн бұрын

@@JohnPublic-dk7zd I'm not sure trump realizes it either.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

@@countrygirl3109 lol, no, he does know his argument...and he knows if he wins, Carter, Bush, Obama, and the puppet win, too...I am pro-immunity, I think the job requires it...elsewise, the aforementioned will be indicted quickly...and soon we are kaput...

Geez Comey and Pompeo knew!

I hope SCOTUS rules against total immunity. And I hope Trump does not get elected again. This could be a perfect storm if SCOTUS does not and he's re-elected. If I was an oponnent of Trupm and that happened, I'd leave the country- -fast. Because he will be all of those people's worst nightmare. I pray this does't happen ann that SCOTUS will not bow to him.

@MarkSmith-pb2ly

9 күн бұрын

Stop been a Trump hater. It is not Trump's fault that you don't know what a man or woman is? Or if you have gender problems, take that up with your parents.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

Odd, the man served 4 years in the office and did pretty good...we were here, we CAN remember...what I find hilarious is how you communist democrats painted yourselves into this corner...don't steal the '20 election, DJT would have about 9 months to go...clowns...

It is important to acknowledge that no individual possesses absolute immunity, including the President of the United States of America. Our nation is not a dictatorship, which is one of the reasons we gained independence from Britain.

This decision should have been made in exactly 9 minutes

@benedibrava

9 күн бұрын

they have to be careful because if they rush, and say president has no immunity most US presidents but trump and few wont face war crimes. president has immunity, what keep him in check is impeachment and not take his orders

The real... Teflon Don. .....

The black guy's hair piece is mesmerizing.

This is what happens when Americans take voting for granted and don't take their civic duty seriously. There are more registered Democrats than Republicans in this country yet not enough vote. This is how we ended up with a Republican-led Senate who put these justices in power. You don't feel like voting? Eventually you won't be able to.

Well if that is the case ! IF The president will have that power to do so then since Biden is in power he should put in order everything and anything to protect and defend our Democracy and beyond to his power that was given to him by the Supreme Court..

@notyourroad

9 күн бұрын

He should. But he's too timid.

@JohnPublic-dk7zd

9 күн бұрын

Be honest, he is too senile to prosecute (his own DOJ said that)...Obama has been his puppeteer since day 1...

As I said the SCOTUS took the case to overturn it or remand it back. Either way it's another big win for Trump.

This is a waste of time. The billionaire-owned extreme court will rule in favor of the guy who owns them.