NUX MG-101 V.S MG-300 which one should you get?
Музыка
Time Line:
0:00 - Intro
0:33 - How I recored these clips
1:24 - Deluxe Reverb
2:32 - VOX AC30
4:12 - JCM800
5:23 - Bogner
7:13 - Difference?
10:23 - My answer is...
More info about NUX:
www.nuxefx.com
Check out CORONA Guitars here:
www.coronaguitar.com/elecguitar
The clip on tuner I use (Cherub WST-905Li) :
www.cherubtechnology.com/wst_9...
Check out SG Strings here:
www.sgstrings.com.br/
The cables I use:
www.providence-ltd.com/feature...
Email me (Work only) :
rockguitar43@gmail.com
If you're interested in these videos, please subscribe to my channel. Leave a "Like". Share with your friends. Common something down below if you have questions. I'll answer it as possible as I can. Thanks for your support. Stay in touch~
Пікірлер: 10
The MG101 solves many processing quality issues that the MG300 has in lower quality (the processing is the same model as the MG400 if I'm not mistaken) therefore, the effects will have higher quality. I see that NUX abandoned the MG300 project after they made V3 of the Firmware, which brought great innovations and added to the quality of the pedalboard, we already know that the V4, which only added the double bass section, is not a great innovation for the guitar. In conversations in the Facebook group, I already learned that the reason why they don't release anything else for the MG300 is the processor. The high cut and level of the EQ pedal could have been included in V3 but they apparently chose not to include it. I'm sorry for the MG300 project being abandoned by NUX as I see it happening.
@jimsimmons2674
18 күн бұрын
I would say the MG101 has more clarity then the MG300,the MG300 is almost dull sounding compared to the MG101!Jimmy how do you think the NUX MG30 sounds compared to the MG101?
@Monkcustom
18 күн бұрын
MG-400‘s DSP is more powerful than MG-300.
@tonebasedfrom
18 күн бұрын
@@Monkcustom I understand that it has lower processing power, but abandoning the project in favor of other products is embarrassing. A sign that not even they believe in the product. I created more than 400 patches with it using what was available on it and without post production. The sound is at the same level as the others, if not better in some cases.
@tonebasedfrom
18 күн бұрын
@@jimsimmons2674 The HD processor really changes the clarity of the sound, the MG300 requires a little more attention to put together a HiGain patch.
@jimmyrocks43
18 күн бұрын
@@jimsimmons2674 I'll try to compare them.
Have check the chorus? I have mg 101, and i think the chorus sound seems doesn't work. I hope nux will fix this problem through firmware update. Also NUX MG 101 don't have master volume like 300. Overall i still prefer 101, TRRS and USB C is big win for me. Nice review bro, your playing is superb.
Overall, the MG 10 SOUNDS FULLER THAN THE 300. The 300 sounds more muffled. I choose the 101!
Still wait review for build quality for long term use
Maqolli ina