I was a little surprised by the result. I thought the higher current losses in the cables would show up. It would be interesting to see what running it at a lower current would do. Say 20, 30 or 40 amps. I know it would take longer, but it might give some more insight into finding the true sweet spot.

@mcg6762

Жыл бұрын

Losses in the cables are in the order of 1 percent maybe. The thing which will determine the overall efficiency the most is the efficiency of the internal combustion engine. It is probably only about 25% efficient but it will depend on the load and that is the factor that matters the most in this test I believe, finding the optimal load level for the engine. Gas contains 33.7 kWh of energy per gallon, so the overall efficiency of this test was about 17.5 percent.

@jfbeam

Жыл бұрын

They did show, but they're pretty low, so it's easy to gloss over it. If you pay attention to the numbers, the full system is about 1% less efficient at the 100A load. (80A was ~93%, 100A was ~92%) But with such a low difference, you'd have to "lab accurate" in each test to properly measure it. (each test is using slightly different amounts of gas, he's running the generator without load for various times, and not starting the test with the inverter set to the target current... but for a YT video, it's accurate enough: honda makes a damn good inverter generator, but you are paying for it.)

@Mike80528

Жыл бұрын

@@mcg6762 Agreed. The goal here should be to find at what load the generator is the most efficient at. I would think in the 80% load range would be ideal but no idea offhand why I would be thinking that (I may be conflating PC power supply efficiency).

@tarstarkusz

9 ай бұрын

@@mcg6762 This is why he should be running a diesel generator. Diesel engines run at higher compression and are above the 25% (maximum) efficiency of a good quality gas engine. When it comes to efficiency, there is really no replacement for compression ratio.

The idea I love about charging a battery w/ the generator is that the generator isn't wasting fuel on low-current applications (i.e. like a car moving itself at idle). It can charge the battery, potentially while also supplying electricity for needs, so the additional energy potential isn't wasted (except in inverter/voltage efficiencies). I wonder what the math is like on powering a house w/ generator, vs powering a house and charging a battery at the same time, so once the generator is off, the battery continues to power the home.

So the efficiency is the same, 93% efficiency. Good video unpredictable results.

I installed the same minisplit as you and couldnt be happier with the inovair. Its been amazing in my camper. It runs off my solar and batteries 24-7 when we are not in our semi truck. Thanks man

Thanks for the test David. I lived off grid, Caretaking for a guy who had 2 of those eu6500's, which got rotated, and ran 24/7. One had 39000 hours on the hour meter, and the motor was NEVER torn apart, burned nearly a pint a day of Castrol full synthetic oil. HONDA is king

A gallon of gasoline contains approximately 33kWh (if my googly is correct). So, from fuel to battery overall efficiency 17.8% is actually better than I would've guess. Would be cool to try to harvest the engine and exhaust heat too.

@jjackson3240

Жыл бұрын

Been a long time now but they did something like that back in the 1970's with I believe a Ford Pinto engine. Used the excess heat for hot water heating. It was likely in a Popular Mechanics issue but I can't be sure anymore.

@TheMobilefidelity

Жыл бұрын

That is the way to go for hot water from a generator. It's called Combined Heat and Power, or CHP, or simply cogeneratiron. I worked on a few setups like that for Hotels, hospitals and the like.

@montey1017

Жыл бұрын

Yeah he needs a diesel. Gasoline contains a lot of energy but isn't very efficient. Diesel isn't perfect but it's better.

@reversedon8698

Жыл бұрын

i would not bother heating whit electricity at this point propane heater would be way better option to heat when there is not enough solar power than wasting on inefficient generator

@retrofitter

Жыл бұрын

@@montey1017 I am thinking a diesel DC welder would be the most efficient way to to do this. I've seen people get around 40% efficiency out of their lister cold start low speed generator sets. And connect the DC output directly to the battery battery bank. If the welder uses brushes for DC output care must be taken such that it doesn't backfeed.

I really appreciate all the information you organize and provide links for in your "Show More" sections. I have been using your Amazon links to build up my supplies, tools, and research. Thank you!

Love your videos David! You do an extraordinary job of explaining things and cover all the bases. Keep up the good work

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

Thanks, I appreciate that.

I just love this kind of thing. I am always doing this kind of testing so I can KNOW what the best settings, values are. Would be neat to do this test again with the newer EFI version of this generator. I'd donate mine for the testing, but I live on the other side of the country!

Love your videos, Dave. You are charmingly awkward and provide excellent information.

As usual, excellent evaluation and testing! God Bless

Hey David. I think the 80% rule also takes into consideration that there will be less RPM, less friction , less wear and tear and therefore longer engine life etc. I may be wrong but that was partly my understanding.

@bumbarabun

Жыл бұрын

You could be wrong, as with higher load it will run shorter time, so it is not that clear.

@miltonbailey1656

Жыл бұрын

I did similar experiment on a smaller generator. I got max power at max generator rating. My belief is that the "rated power" of the generator is the 80% value. The manufacture rates them at peak efficiency.

Thanks for your work 👍👍👍

Thanks. Very interesting. The cold weather would have helped with the efficiency of the engine and the cooling. Recovery of the engine heat would help the overall efficiency no end. Looking forward to your next post.

Thanks for yet another carefully designed test series. I have a 3kw Honda inverter gen set which we take on the road with us, it does the job of running the caravan including air-conditioning walking away. A previous 2kw inverter gen set woeked! fine but it's 80cc engine was not any better on fuel than the 270cc Honda which supports your findings. I also own and maintain a 5kva diesel, neither genset cops your kind of workout, in fact both now have permanent battery chargers installed so they will start during a prolonged event. We don't see snow here or any temperature below 0 dec C.

I like that you don't let your expectations overrule your data. Great science! Let the data speak.

Great content as always David!! 💪🧠🤯

Excellent test

Good solid generator. One problem is conversion efficiency, a mere 16%. Run the gen indoors to get up to 80%. Put a hose on exhaust to scavenge that heat as well before venting it out. Remaining heat can be used to warm up air going on to the engine.

@per-erikpersson9898

Жыл бұрын

That is the way to go, wasting all that heat from the engine.... Hooking it up to the water heater would be even better.

David, I have been watching and learning from your channels for years now. Thank you for all the good information that you provide. Is it possible to do an episode about adding wind power to your setup? Missouri Wind and Solar has been around for a while now, maybe they can send you a system to test.

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

I wouldn't mind testing a turbine. However, my location is not very windy, which is why i never bothered buying a turbine.

Makes sense, I have heard that a generator will be the most efficient running close to max output. Efficient not in fuel burn vs time but fuel burn vs output

Great video David, I think you may have been trying to double count the 80%, the 5500 watt rated output is 85% of the max output, and is what the generator is designed to run at extended periods for. There are arguments for lower output causing less strain and wear, though conversely that puts more hours on the parts as well. You may also want to consider if the EG4 charger running at max is getting too toasty. Personally probably would go for 90-95 amps and a strict regime of quality oil changes to maintain engine efficiency.

Here in CT we pay $0.35 per kwhr. I run a Onan marine generator water cooled to charge my bank and heat my shop. The power going in my battery is basically free as I need to heat the shop. I do not have all the gadgets to test my system like you but it's working well for me.

@dellmerlin6328

Жыл бұрын

Heating your shop is a great way to get more useful energy from the generator. You get an A+ for doing CHP, Combined Heat and Power.

Those inverter generators are impressively efficient. Usually between about 20% to 90% load you are going to be pretty similar. I'm surprised the last run did so well!

@mcg6762

Жыл бұрын

I wouldn't call 17.5% efficiency impressive.

@MarcAntoineBvl

Жыл бұрын

@@mcg6762 ikr, I have 60kva genset at work that go up to 29% at 85% load

Awesome test the generator didn't shut down at over capacity because its cold outside.

I love it - you have to teach in MIT. They will love your accuracy explanation. Current at the end and the beginning of the cable is different due to losses 👍. Good job!

I was not surprised. Internal combustion engines are most efficient when the throttle is not creating a vacuum, and peak pressures and temperatures in the combustion chamber are achieved. Look up the Wikipedia article on heat engine efficiency for the details.

GREAT TEST . GOT BETTER RESULTS DURING SESSIONS TOWARDS THE END AT 100 AMPS . 👍

Thanks for the video, David. Hard to beat those Honda Inverter Generators, efficient & reliable. Recently installed a EG4 Change-Inverter and for the money it's a good buy. A gas generator unfortunately is a necessity when loss of utility or off grid even with solar. My plan is to convert or build a wood gasifier generator. They are not very efficient as compared to gas, diesel, propane, alcohol etc. but having plenty of wood on property, already use for heat, and it a resource that is not reliant on someone else to supply but till that happens good ole gas generator is there. Stay Safe & Good Luck

@BecomingOffgrid

Жыл бұрын

I would love to see a video on now this is done.

Hi David This is great and your devotion to the task & to all of us is amazing ! If you have not done the Conversion Effecincy of Gasoline to Kilowatt hours it is easy with BTUs. There are 120,000 btu in the Gallon of Gasoline and 3,400btu in a kilowatt/hour. You got 5.8 Kilowatt hours so about 20,000 btu, gives ~ 16.6% conversion efficiency. Which is not bad for a small system as the Best Grid Systems are about 50% efficient... Plan B would be to Capture the Heat from the generator to heat your water.... Run the exhaust through a Plate Heat Exchanger. PS $3.50 gasoline for $.64 grid electricity is why we LOVE Solar. Great work Thanks James

This is great data! I've defiantly thought about adding a generator to my system. I've got two 100 amp chargers so it might be interesting to connect them both together and charge at 180 amps! Then compare the fuel price vs grid power. Thanks so much for your hard work and the crazy amount of time I'd take to produce this video David.

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for recognizing the time spent to make these tests and videos. It's a lot of work.

@robertwagner3088

Жыл бұрын

At $4.00 a gallon that works out to $0.69 per KW for 5.8 KW; while significantly higher than the average utility this is good to know for those times when Solar needs some help in an off-grid application. Thanks David!

@jeffreystorer4966

Жыл бұрын

Been off grid 2o yrs ,high output altnator and chargers,. Your battery bank will only accept the charge the battery can take ,I surgest 1 kVA EU Honda , with 15 amp max quality charger,or build DC Genset 4o amo car alt four stroke 2 HP , Honda 1 will run 8 hrs for half a gallon

Thanks for doing this! I've always wondered how much generating your own power would cost. 5.9 kWh / $4.16 gal reg unl = 70.5 cents per kWh

@rv10flyer84

Жыл бұрын

That’s why it’s cheaper in the long run to buy more solar panels and charge controllers if needed. 34kWp and counting. Gen not needed so far at 38° latitude in the hypocrite belt.

@MrOpenGL

Жыл бұрын

What is an hypocrite belt? Genuine question.

@electrodacus

Жыл бұрын

That is actually quite an efficient generator. Still 70 cent/kWh vs around 2 cent/kWh for solar is 35x more expensive. I also heat my house with solar PV in a cold climate and I do not have a gasoline generator or any other sort of backup.

@ulfg1409

Жыл бұрын

One more thing: fuel is just one of the costs. You'll be burning more money when you add generator maintenance (oil changes, spark plug, battery replacement, air filter...), wear (it eventually gets worn out and needs to be replaced by another expensive generator), using fuel in your car to haul fuel to the generator... Fuel should be the big cost, but everything else will add up to so much you need to factor it in.

@mountaindan1840

Жыл бұрын

In my part of the hypocrite belt, we just went 3 or 4 days with essentially no solar. We have gone as many as 12. You either need a freight train loaded with money, or a generator. I had estimated 65 c/kwh at $3. This is nice to know exactly. Thanks David. Sizing a system to balance panels,batteries, and backup is dicey to me. 3-4 dollar gas can nail you quickly. And with minimum bills, benevolence is not on the agenda for the utility.

would be really interesting to repeat this test with your diy alternator generator you built in your last video!!

Great info, thx. Facial hair situation is looking gewwwd.

I would like to see this test with a non-inverter generator. I know inverter generators are more efficient but I'm curious what the difference is. Love the videos!!

It would have been interesting to see the run time results as well. Since the power output was roughly the same as measured by the shunt I have to believe the runtime was less as you increased the load. Maybe a shorter runtime is more advantageous for any number of reasons.

@kevinthompson4690

Жыл бұрын

yes run time is very important given the results were almost identical for amperage. Can you run longer on reduced load? and still charge the same amount.

@enigma9789

Жыл бұрын

@@kevinthompson4690 Why would you want to run longer and get the same amount? Why not run the max power for the shortest time if fuel economy is the same either way.

@thephantom1492

Жыл бұрын

@@enigma9789 Engine wear. The higher the load, the more it wear it. But it is probably minimal, time (years) will damage it more than the extra load

There are a few important- but usually overlooked- things for anyone living "off grid" to consider. Since fuel is expensive, you want to get the most out of it. This means not only an efficient, slow speed generator set, but critically it MUST be water cooled so you can capture the waste heat. Even the best generator set rejects the overwhelming majority of the energy in the fuel as heat. Your test shows 83% wasted! You want that heat, or at least most of it. Heat up water and provide heat for your home with it. Also you want a small, low power generator set so it doesn't make more heat than you can use at one time. Ideally you'd time the operation of some of your loads so you bypass the inefficient charger/battery/inverter, and go straight to the load. If it will be charging a battery, you want to put together a direct current set that operates at battery voltage, to skip at least one step of loss. There are no small, low speed, good quality generator sets made anymore. This means overhauling a good old set, or putting together something on your own. Select a GOOD, small liquid cooled engine, such as a small Kubota diesel, and find a good generator for it to drive. Again, the key attributes are small, liquid cooled, slow speed. Diesel will be quite a bit more efficient too.

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

I agree that a diesel is a better choice. This winter I purchased an MEP-802A, which is a 1800RPM diesel, liquid cooled. I've shown it in a couple of my videos. I've had this Honda for about 11 years and still use it.

Nice generator

It's good that the load can be matched to rpm

Good experiment and video idea .. try using wood gas for the generator. 🙌

I'd recommend a Bridge Rectifier as a Backup for Shtf - the tranformerless Pv Inverters will take a rectified generator input on the DC MC4 plugs in an emergency. 100amp 3phase Bridge Rectifiers, some are pretty robust and cheap

Fuel economy vrs engine load (engine strain) . . I'd run at 80% and treat the engine a bit nicer. . . Might last longer.. run cooler, less stress, etc. Good luck. GREAT vid.

Let me start by saying I really like alternative generation, storage and utilization of energy. I fully believe solar, wind and other renewable energy sources are how we will power our lives in the future. However, as you mentioned at the beginning of this video, there are times when those renewable sources just aren't reliable, so we have to be prepared with other solutions, including using fossil fuels, when necessary. Now, with that disclaimer out of the way, I think it is absolutely worth noting how much energy (roughly 5.8kw) you were able to put back into your battery bank with just a gallon of gasoline. When you consider that is probably close to 20% of your daily electricity usage, it's pretty remarkable that you could charge that much in a short time, using such a small amount of fuel. It's comforting to know that when solar isn't enough, just a few gallons of gas will charge up your system enough to keep the lights on and your household operating normally.

First of all, thank you for doing the tests. I have wondered this same thing myself, and I am glad that it turned out to not really matter. I went back and looked at your generator. I see it is an older EU6500is, non fuel-injected like the newer EU7000is. I remember from some other sources that claimed the fuel injection didn’t improve the efficiency over a carburetor, at least a well tuned one. It would be interesting to see someone prove this in or out with hard data. On a different note, this is no doubt obvious to you, but may not be to others, that it will be more efficient to run loads directly off the generator if possible, rather than going through the batteries back through the inverter into the loads. In practice for example to also run a load of laundry or do something else task oriented when you need to top up the batteries, rather than run those tasks later from the batteries through the inverter. Assuming both that changing the batteries and running the inverters are both 93% efficient each by themselves, the end-to-end efficiency would be 86% efficient versus just running the task directly from the generator. Again, thanks for the video!

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

Yes, it's true that if you are running a constant 5kW load (like a water heater) directly from the generator, then it's more efficient, saving the 13-14%. However, it's not as simple as that. Since our house loads vary, the generator doesn't see a consistent load. I have a previous video out where I tested the efficiency of my generator with a 1kW load (about 19% of the generator rating). I got 2.6kWh/gallon. Compared to the 5.8kWh/gallon in this video, that represents a 2.6kWh out to the load is 3.7kWh less than the maximum power/gal as measured at the generator. Or, a 59% loss. So, compared to running a 1kW load, charging the battery directly is far more efficient. As you can see, I can't say "running loads directly is more efficient". The answer is "it depends". BTW, I'm not arguing, I'm just sharing some additional thoughts that go into it. I find it a lot of fun to thing through these things and make spreadsheets.

@thaddeustroyer

Жыл бұрын

@@DavidPozEnergy damn Dave... you are a smart mother#$%$er. Thats awesome. Also I didn't think you were arguing, data, is what it is. You were just presenting that. 👍

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Thaddeus.

@justindarkcloud

Жыл бұрын

Do you have an inverter/charger that takes an ac input from a generator, can be set to take a constant input to power loads and send the rest to a battery to keep the input power constant? Would this be best for the example above?

very interesting

Hi from the uk I have a similar hoda generator and while it is good and reliable and dose what it says on the tin they are not efficient I think I measured mine at 480grams per kWhr I think this is because it uses a permanent magnet alternator like many Japanese motor cycles rather than one with a proper active rotor adjusted by a regulator. But it dose have the advantage that if you change load suddenly or over load it the frequency won't droop only the voltage dose a little Keep up the good work

Be nice to see a 50A/50% test - I run my generator at 50% rated when just charging, but have pass-through options for more power if there is more than just the charger running.

To get best value from the generator fuel try to find a use for the waste heat from the exhaust pipe. Something like 40% of the energy put into the engine as gasoline is lost from the exhaust as heat. If it's really cold then the LiFePO4 batteries will like some heat around them for best function and life.

Great video. By the way where did you get the gas filler? Would love to get one

Be interesting to see how a victron multiplus would do.

My Chargeverter came in today from Signature Solar. I sure hope it lasts longer than the other 48v charger I purchased from them. I wired up my propane generator last weekend in preparations for the new Chargeverter.

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

Good luck with it. I hope it works well for you.

Wondering if bi facial solar panels would help your situation with cloudy days / snowy days. That's the standard for my old company for doing installs in Wisconsin.

How about adding a wood gasifier? It can heat up your home, heat additionally a buffer tank of hot water and generate gas to run a generator to generate energy to charge up the battery. :)

I use a generator like this, change the carburetor to a dual fuel switchable carburetor fo4 under $40, make a HHO water to hydrogen electrolysis generator that separates the oxygen out, port the oxygen into the air intake with a small line, the hydrogen goes into the propane fitting with a gas appliance hose and regulator (like a propane BBQ set) and add a low pressure air pressure switch cut off at 15 psi on the hydrogen line to shut off the 12 VDC to the electrolysis chamber, and it needs to be in a indoor space like a garage with an exhaust ported outside, and this can be run as long as you need it. The system will cost under $300 to make, and only use gasoline when this is down for maintenance, and the engine basically only needs an oil change once a week. Running cost is around $30 a week, instead of $50 for fuel per day, and the engine runs better and longer on HHO. My HHO system is much larger, about a $700 unit, higher efficiency carbon fiber panels instead of stainless steel, and I run the hydrogen outlet through a bubbler cylinder with two gallons of gasoline to force hydrocarbon out of the fuel with the small bubbles, this combined with hydrogen makes a more efficient and more powerful fuel. It needs to be dried and filtered for any latent moisture, but it can be run through the 3/4" steel pipes to the home appliances as well lie the kitchen range, water heater and furnace, as long as they use an electronic ignition they don't waste fuel on a standing pilot and this is as safe as propane, but at 1/10 the cost, little maintenance and no calling for delivery or need to be in a municipal system with natural gas. The HHO also should discharge into a like with a 1 gallon expansion tank, it will fill and even out the on/off cycle as it operates to pressure up to the limit of the 15 psi NC pressure switch to keep the chamber as safe as possible. Do not use a dual output hydrogen with oxygen in the same pressure system, over 20 psi in voluble can spontaneously explode. Cheers.

Now I am curious what 60% and maybe 40% would be. I would have also thought the 80% would be the most efficient.

I am not totally surprised, but I did expect there would be some differences and its a testament to the generator that there really weren't. Of course, it was pushing steady power the whole time, so "idle" losses would not be a factor in any of the tests. Still though, I'm imrpessed! The amperage is going to be the same along the whole wire loop no matter what the wire resistance is. The wire resistance will reduce the voltage only. That is, some power is lost due to wire resistance (power = current * voltage), but the amperage (and thus amp-hours) remains the same. Ultimately what is important here is to read the generator specifications, there should be a specification for the maximum efficiency point. Or a curve, or something. The charger should also have a specification somewhere (but generally it will be near the top-end of its capability). The batteries themselves... well, that many batteries, are being charged at well under 1C even at 100A, so their efficiency will not be affected at all for any of the amperages tested. -Matt

That is surprising results. That Honda inverter generator may be more efficient at lower wattage output in eco mode with the load low enough that the rpm is lower.

My experience with generator power, The limit to output has more to do with ambient temperature, When the load is high the motor will shut down on high temp . This experience is from generators with liquid filled radiators

$3.50/gal divided by 5.9kWh/gal equals 59 cents/kWh. That's about 5 times the national average price of grid electricity delivered to the home. Although 59 cents sounds expensive at first, that is probably a bargain compared to upfront and recurring cost of being connected to the grid, especially for a home that didn't have the grid to begin with. And if you only need to generate from gasoline, say, 10% or less of your annual energy consumption, then yeah, no problem. Good work, David! I would be curious how that compares to other types/models of generators. Maybe you can borrow friends' open frame generators, smaller 120V suitcase generators, or even a new fuel-injected model for comparison testing. edit: just watched your suitcase generator comparison video, not sure how I missed that.

I've got a 3.8KW inverter petrol generator which I use to boost my batteries via a couple of Siemens telecomms rectifiers. I get 7.5KWh into the batteries off a 5L can of fuel (1.5KWh/Litre). This works out at an overall efficiency of 16% which is reasonable for this sort of system. I've noticed that efficiency doesn't vary widely over a range of charge rates.

@AndyFletcherX31

Жыл бұрын

BTW petrol has about 9KWh energy per litre. Small internal combustion engines are horribly inefficient.

I wonder if this would be possibly with the inverter for home is on?

It takes a certain amount of energy just to overcome friction to turn the internal components of the generator. If the generator is producing more current in a given time period, then the less percentage of the total energy consumed goes toward overcoming the rotational friction. The generator undoubtedly ran for less time on a gallon of fuel as the output power increased. Meaning that the amount of rotational friction affected the total loss less with higher outputs. I suspect there's a close correlation between the ratio of runtime per gallon and the efficiency per given output load.

My question is about pre-charging inverter caps. How many times does this need to be done? Just the first time? Every time you disconnect? My design calls for a breaker and a Anderson connector as ways to disconnect the inverter from the system. So when I use one of these means to disconnect, I have to use the resistor before reconnecting? Seems like I am missing something.

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

When I was making my own batteries, I used a pre-charge resistor every time I made a physical connection to the battery. However, recently I've been using the EG4 batteries. These have pre-charge resistors built into the BMS, so it does it for you. signaturesolar.com/shop-all/batteries/?ref=4_rHcgZ9x-TiF-

I totally agree with elec efficient heating like mini splits. But I don't want to use gas unless absolutely necessary. Winter: a propane heating system is much less Dollars to heat than a Generator to Elec heat, so we have a propane forced air heater. No generator this winter at all!

David, there are several vids, on internet and youtube , on how to run generators on home made HHO---water

I am not surprised at all. That's a really nice generator and its energy output was the same because the fuel was the same, you just underestimated that Honda. Edit: Seeing as how the fuel efficiency doesn't really change I would probably keep it at 70-80 amps just to try and run everything a bit cooler get the most life out of that expensive generator. With a grain of salt bud, your obviously have more gear and experience than I do.

I have a 14KW diesel generator and it has a fuel efficiency chart to get the highest power output for the least amount of diesel fuel use. I will use that as a guide, and for my gasoline inverter generator I will use the 80%+ rating to charge the batteries.

I too am couris what the run times where. And maybe a 50A and 40A tests... Also a cheaper non interter Genset.... BUT even better, getting at the DC bus of the Honda 😍

Almost 6 kWh per gallon. Not bad at all for a relatively small generator.

That rating is probably at 20ºC, being colder it's probably able to output more.

Always interesting. I thought you would have different results. It seems the load was not very different as far as the genny was concerned. Wonder what the current was on the genny side of your setup. Assume it didn’t change much. Thanks for sharing

@bumbarabun

Жыл бұрын

For 100A charge current at gen side is about 48*100/120 = 40A assuming batteries are 48V and Gen voltage is 120V. For 80A it is 48*100/80=32A

Good Tests As far as cost per KW generated it depends on state location and type of generator. I live in Southern California with typically the highest gasoline prices in the country. A year plus ago it was as high as $7.00 a gallon. This week 04/05/23; it's $4.50/gal. btw - Here in SoCal my low usage Southern California Edison electricity rates are peak @ $0.49/KW-Hr. Several years ago I did tests on three generators. I don't recall what the price of gas at the time. Guestimate $4.00/gal 1) Harbor Freight Tailgater 2 cyl 800/900W @ $1.35/KW-hr 2) Champion 4 cyl 1200/1500W @ ~$1.00/Kw-hrs. 3) Sears Craftsman 4 cyc 4500/5000W I DID NOT TEST but I guestimate for some reason was maybe $0.75 - 0.90/Kw-hr. I would love to see a repeat test done with an equivalent size generator size to yours with a DIESEL generator. - Paul

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

Awesome you did some testing on your own generators. The past few months, my local gas stations averaged $3.50/gal. I have a diesel generator (MEP-803A) that I'll be doing a fuel test on at some point.

Maybe time to look into a wood gasifier for fuel. Also, you can couple your heat pumps to the ground... if you've got digging equipment or access to, it'll probably be cost effective rather quickly. Another thought, I added 60w ir bulbs pointed right at me in places where I spend lots of time, and lowered my thermostat by ~5 degrees. Couple that with heated blankets and I get massive savings on the coldest days. I'm sure this approach could yield better comfort and energy savings, but I just don't get that many cold days to go further with it.

@bumbarabun

Жыл бұрын

I would think that for wood it would be more efficient to use stirling engine for generation, though it is more difficult to find.

@ur_quainmaster7901

Жыл бұрын

@@bumbarabun It is, but it's difficult to scale large enough for home power generation. Way easier to just make fuel for a conventional generator set.

Would love to see you try a 40, 50, 60 percent test, to see if different results

@browsedeweb8834

Жыл бұрын

^ This.

Interesting, love the tests and resulting data. So at $3.50 a gallon, your talkings 60 cents a kw. How many gallons do you usually use over the winter.

I noticed on another of your videos you used a smaller generator. Is using a smaller and more gas efficient geny efficient to recharge batteries? ( using a chargeverter). Also, is there a setting on your Schneider ( or any other you might be aware of) that allows for automatic generator start if the batteries run low , given the geny is an electric start ?

It’s has to be the honda generator… Nice video

I noticed the 100 Amp test you didn't turn on the eco throttle (at least on camera).

I wish you did temperature readings on the generator to see if it runs hotter on higher amps. Higher temperatures, more wear and tear, kind of thing.

Another point to consider is the efficiency of the generator itself. One gallon of gasoline contains 34 kWh of energy (approx), and the generator delivered 5.8 kWh of electrical energy into its load (the EG4 charger) on one gallon of gas, so 5.8/34 = 17% efficiency. By comparison, utility-scale combined cycle natural gas fired power plants run at about 55 to 60% efficiency.

With my pair of sungoldpower 6548 inverters i dont need the separate charger as swiching from grid feed to generator feed will automatically force inverters to charge battery bank and use energy from generator to run house at same time. Only issue is when running dual fuel westinghouse 6500 generator on propane cant run dryer as propane doesnt have enough energy to charge batteries and run house with dryer going. Havent tried it running with gasoline yet but will update this post once i do.

thinking about going solar in one of your videos i heard you say that your home is all electric do you know how large of a solar array to go off grid would be needed for a house that averages 66 kw day use

It would be interesting if someone made a smart control system to run the generator just enough to get by until sunrise. I'm thinking you probably don't want to charge your batteries on gasoline to have 95% SOC at sunrise. I bought a Westinghouse auto start generator when they were on sale about a year ago. it would be nice to use just enough fuel to keep power going until panels are producing enough to take over.

Good evening. It would be interesting to see what happens if you take one of these generators without an inverter and connect a charger that directly charges the battery pack from the DC of the generator. Double conversion is eliminated. There would only be losses from the engine/generator/rectifier/charger unit.

@evil17

Жыл бұрын

These generators only typically output about 8A @ 12v or 96W, so it would take 60+ hours of engine operation to get the same wattage back into batteries at that rate.

Does the genny turn on by itself if minimum voltage is reached say 44.8 volts and engine cut off when voltage reaches say 52.0 volts??

I think that you were able to achieve those results because it was cold outside, try it again when it is hot in the summer, I would like to see? Thanks for the video!

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

In the summer I have more than enough solar power. I only ever need the generator in January. (OK, and maybe the first week of Feb. LOL)

Would be interesting what Resultat that test would bring without the Eco throttle.

Get a watercooled generator and hook up a heat exchanger on it cooling circuit. That will increase your efficiency more than anything else you will try. Heating the boiler etc costs the most power, using the wasted heat energy from the ICE could heat your home if you store it in buffers.

If you heat your home with electricity anyway, why don't you take this setup to the next level: Get a non-inverter, and maybe a Diesel generator. You already have a device with wich you can tune in the sweet spot of efficiency (the charger) So you can spare the losses of the inverter in the generator. Also a Diesel should be more efficient. And furthermore: Diesel is almost indefinably storeable Also try to use the heat from the engine somehow. Get a heat exchanger for the exhaust and heat your water that way. Duct the hot Air from the engine into your house If that thing has to run, you are probably in the middle of winter, so a little extra heat is nothing to waste

so the honda eco setting is great for constant current draws for efficiency but not for large surges.

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

Yes, that's been my experience with it.

You mentioned the run time on the first test but not the others.Were they relatively close or was the run time shorter as amperage went up?If the run time shortens as amperage goes up you may as well go full out to get max recharge in least amount of time.

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

the run times got shorter. The 70A test was the longest duration (1.5 hours). The 100A test was the shortest duration (1 hour).

@evil17

Жыл бұрын

@@DavidPozEnergyso a fairly direct relationship we can see here between time & power for the same quantity of fuel.

great video and tests. Just wondering....I think I saw on a previous video that you had a large propane tank. So...just thinking if you had a small 2kw honda(or other great one) that ran on propane and turned on automatically when the batteries got below say 20 percent and charged them back up to say 50 percent...just food for thought. anyhow, good stuff here, thanks.

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

I have a 20 lb. propane tank, but that's it. A few years ago I posted a video on my friends, Bill, home in Vermont. He has a 500 lb. propane tank. Perhaps you are thinking of that?

Can you get DC power off that generator and bypass an inverter and a charger? Curious about what the efficiency gains would be.

Don't inverter style generators generate dirty AC then convert it to DC then to from DC to clean (pure sine wave) AC? If so it would be interested in tapping that DC off the Honda generator and see how much efficiency improves by avoiding the final conversion to AC. Wonder if it could be hacked safely if it would get more charge per gallon.

Woul be interesting to see 40amps or maybe even 30 to see where it drops off

this is why overdrive is more fuel efficient in ice vehicles. you are lugging the engine back so more work for a given speed. In the case of a generator that runs a constant speed, the throttle is open more of the time with a higher load. So more air gets in and the fuel is burned more efficiently with more air. Honda absolutely makes the best gasoline generators. I think that model has fuel injection. If so then fuel air ratio is constantly being adjusted along with the throttle. Cheaper generators with a carburetor have a fixed fuel air ratio and the throttle controls the speed by only controlling how much air gets in and varying the amount of fuel.

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

Thanks. This particular model (EU6500) is a carburetor. The current version of this generator is the EU7000, and it is fuel injected. They look almost identical.

Sounds like there might be a charge limit internal to the batteries or the BMS

Wow long hair ! Didn’t recognize you lol great video

@DavidPozEnergy

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, I'm trying out long hair for fun. Now that I'm out of the service I don't have to keep a high and tight.

I was looking for something like this last year and I couldn't find anything suitable. I've been using the 50 amp charger inside of a 6 KW inverter but it's extremely inefficient running a 13,000 watt 2 cylinder generator and I blow through a tank of gas in just a few hours. Well only adding 3% to the battery per hour.

Honda continues to impress...