I laughed pretty hard at this video. Conspiracy Chris is pretty entertaining.

@pzark3638

4 жыл бұрын

I would still like to see a reappearance of Canadian Chris

@foothillfilms6179

4 жыл бұрын

Microsoft Patent WO 2020-060606 . Cryptocurrency body activity data. Biometric tracking. I laughed when I read this patent. It's so cool.

@aarontharris

4 жыл бұрын

@@pzark3638 he's always Canadian ;)

@royvankuik

4 жыл бұрын

5g stands for: "Government, Government, Government, Government, Government" that is too much Government. Wonderful :D

@Glurgi

4 жыл бұрын

@@royvankuik To be fair, 5 governments *would* be too much government ;)

I am definitely going to get this camera in this pandemic.... to see what my neighbors are doing ghaaa!!

Always brings a smile to my face when a new Chris and Jordan video comes out! Best wishes from Toronto, stay healthy and be safe!

I appreciate that you mentioned it, the best use of this camera is for shooting small objects at close range that leads to the subject filling the frame. So many reviews shoot objects a mile away to show how close it looks in the viewfinder or photo. Of course, the pictures are terrible. This camera is so good for shooting frame-filled small birds and other small wildlife that are virtually impossible to get otherwise without cropping.

What's funny is that I've been wanting to make a similar video to this on my camera channel forever. I know too much about this subject and laughed hysterically at every reference you made! Great video!

I have watched a lot of Chris's reviews. This one is by far my favorite.

I was looking for a Nikon Coolpix P950 review and found this rather special one. So refreshing! Apart from helpful and informative. Thanks!

Had to subscribe if just for the humour!! Thank you for the reviews, stats, and a chuckle along the way. Great Work!

Good review Chris. I have had the P900 for a while now and I am still astounded at the quality of both pics & HD vid it is capable of capturing. As you said, it likes light... and in good light I think it is a phenomenal camera and at its current price point... an absolute steel! I also have a Panasonic G7 and a Sony a6500, both also excellent cameras in their own right but I still break out the P900 more often than not because of the huge range of the lens as well as some very capable macro functionality.

Finally, thanks to the flat Earth and this camera I can shoot the Eifel tower without traveling to Europe

@m4rcin847

4 жыл бұрын

Ive film the australian kangaroo yesterday :D

@m.philip

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@johngault1407

3 жыл бұрын

@@m4rcin847 kzread.info/dash/bejne/dXlptbaslJngoLQ.html

@johngault1407

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/dXlptbaslJngoLQ.html

@neolexiousneolexian6079

3 жыл бұрын

@@johngault1407 When or if you eventually get banned, I hope you realize it was for spam, and not because anyone's trying to suppress your oh-so-revelatory "truth".

P1000 can shoot at its widest 24mm equivalent (when measured diagonally in JPEG or RAW developed in Lightroom), but if you develop RAW in any other software such as RawTherapee, you can get up to 20mm equivalent wide image. Of course it will have black corners(I even like this artistic effect sometimes), but they are not very noticeable. Even after cropping the photo stays at about 21mm equivalent, what is much wider than by default 24mm. Always shoot in RAW to increase the useful resolution of your photos. Yes! Otherwise the photos are digitally zoomed, what is decreasing the visual acuity. I believe the same trick may work for p950 the same way.

Excellent video! I love the humor you guys put in your videos but this one really makes me laugh!

That stab at flat earther made me chuckle. For those who don't know: the p900 and p1000 are the go-to solutions for flat earthers trying to prove the absence of curvature

@MatthewSaville

4 жыл бұрын

Too bad it's VERY easy to use the camera to prove the exact opposite, if you know what the heck you're doing...

@asub3292

4 жыл бұрын

@@MatthewSaville literally just watch a boat leave, and you can see it disappear from the bottom to the top. If the earth was flat, it would only get smaller.

@Artyomthewalrus

4 жыл бұрын

@@asub3292 But the thing is, the earth is accelerating up at 9.8m/s squared. Thus "gravity" exists. Because of this light appears to bend and fall to the earth. Much as if you throw a ball in a straight trajectory it will eventually hit the ground. Light has a similar trajectory to said ball, except because it's lighter and faster it can go much further distances before it hits the ground, in addition, our eyes can only see the light once it hits our eyes, we cannot see the flight path of the light particle as it's flying towards us (IE, we don't see the light particles of objects that are too far away and hit the ground before they hit us). If we could only see the end point of a thrown ball, all thrown balls would appear as though they hit the ground unless they were thrown close enough to hit us, does this prove that the earth is round? no.

@colinstock325

4 жыл бұрын

Waldo you flat earthers seem to accept that the other planets are globes, if we’re accelerating at 9.8m/s2 how come we haven’t left the sun and the other planets behind?. Also what’s our current speed through the universe? And how come we haven’t hit the ceiling of the universe yet?

@colinstock325

4 жыл бұрын

Waldo why haven’t you lot explored what’s at the edge of this flat earth? These days you could live feed a drone that you could fly over the edge of the world.

I love this video! Informative and SO funny. Great job!

Good morning from 🇬🇧. Interesting video as usual 👍🏻

I have the 900 and absolutely love it!

Thanks for the review 😍

I love Nikon coolpix P950, bisa lihat supermoon tanggal 7 Mei 2020 kemarin, sangat senang sekali bisa lihat bulan dari dekat. Terima kasih.

Thanks this really helps ive been thinking about getting one of these its an awsome camera

Hahaha, the anti-government, flat Earther comments are killing me.

@michaelkettleson7317

4 жыл бұрын

He needs to read Terry Pratchet's Discworld the truth is the world is a disc supported on the backs of 4 giant elephants standing on the back of the Great A'Tuin a astrochelonian (Turtle)

@Monomonmamon

4 жыл бұрын

@@michaelkettleson7317 I thought the earth was T-Rex Shaped, dang I was wrong all the time.

@garyryan7852WR

3 жыл бұрын

No your government is killing you. Take off the mask get a p899 ,950 or p1000 and see the truth .The earth is flat and covid is a lie .

Love watching your channel you guys are so insightful humorous and you guys are very inventive with the way you produce your videos. It's such a shame that Nikon, Canon and Sony continue to make the superzooms with tiny sensors. I can't wait till they go to a micro four-thirds superzoom. I have owned Nikon Canon Fuji Panasonic superzooms and sadly none of them deliver for Quality whether it's a raw file or a JPEG and the rolling shutter is terrible even on a good fluid head tripod the pictures typically are disappointing. I'm praying and crossing my fingers that Panasonic and perhaps Olympus will come out with a micro 4/3 super zoom with Better stabilization better options for 4K video mic Jack touchscreen all of that good stuff a lot of us would pay the money for if they just built something with a biggest sensor better. Optics what's going on it's 2020..?

Great video, thanks.

Flat earthers' favourite release 😂😂 Galaxy S20 ultra has larger sensor than this one 🧐 1/1.33 inch vs 1/2.3 inch 😮

@dimacherepovskyi8600

4 жыл бұрын

But it is lacking such large lens.

@The.Urban.Birder

4 жыл бұрын

Would love to see this lens coupled with something like the flagship 1/2.3" Sony sensors, seen in the latest phones. These sensors have faster readout and PDAF, which would result in a more desirable product. I am baffled as to why Nikon stuck with this 16 MP ancient CDAF sensor.

@genderender

4 жыл бұрын

But this camera actually has usable zoom

@terrywbreedlove

4 жыл бұрын

3000 MM on the P1000 would be handy for Dragon Flies etc and small birds close by so you can fill the frame. Shooting anything at great distance will as you noted introduce atmospherics hurting image quality.

@petercseszarik6552

4 жыл бұрын

@@The.Urban.Birder probably cheaper

I have the p1000 and I love it. It will not replace your full frame camera anytime soon (photos are very noisy even at base iso) but 4K @ 3000mm? No camera can beat that. And stabilisation is also very impressive. I just play around with mine and I can get reasonably good video @ 3000mm with no shake. Awesome toy, especially for birds and wildlife at great distance

I am disappointed that this camera doesn't have a FLAT profile when shooting video of the FLAT earth.

@P900Coolpics

3 жыл бұрын

Don’t really need the camera water says it all tbh. 😊

Love your style. Subbed.

Don't think I'll ever buy this camera, but the review was super fun to watch !!!

I would like to condemn this video on behalf of all Flat-Earthers around the globe, oh wait......

@KentLindsay

4 жыл бұрын

LOL!!! Nothing funnier than people!

@mathisrecords

3 жыл бұрын

globers are just programmed with the same tired old jokes, you arent spinning

Your best review so far ! I think you hit it. There is still a market for this. I have pro gear but take the p1000 out many times. Will buy the 950. Thanks for the effort. Long live flat earthers!

Omg you are so cute! Im waiting for my p950 camera to be shipped. Can’t hardly wait. Love your videos. Thanks for this one.

Nice video. I have a p1000 but enjoyed your video very much. good work

The Nikon Coolpix P950 and P1000 were two bridge cameras that I compared along with the Sony RX10 IV. After researching and reading countless reviews I went with the Song RX10 IV. The extreme 125x zoom (24 - 3000mm) on the P1000 many of the reviews conveyed the at the long range end of the lens the quality suffered to the point of almost unacceptable. The P950 had many comments to it's short comings on low light issues. So I ended up buying the Sony RX10 IV which is way more pricing but the Zeiss lens at 24 - 600mm 2.4 -4 was in line with what I was looking for in a bridge camera. And the speed of the RX10 IV and raving fans of the autofocus. The whole concept of a bridge camera is unique in that It offers a reaching zoom but does compromise on the fact that the one and only lens it has is it - there isn't any options. Great review of the P950. Oh - your sense of humor is spot on !

"flat earth" to "atmospheric distortion"... I see what you did there! 😂 👏👏👏👏

@johngault1407

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/dXlptbaslJngoLQ.html

Hey guys I love your work! Can you all do a video on astro photography? I really want to get into it but I just want some guidelines and just thought it would be a great video for you guys.

I have the p900 and the p1k thinking about getting this too, thanks for the vid.

@lionellosanti

Жыл бұрын

lol why

Hilarious review!

So many conspiracy theories in one video I was expecting to see the camera conspiracies guy walk by in the background

@rexluminus9867

3 жыл бұрын

🤣😂🚳There were some!!!🦝😅

Watching from Jamaica

@arturocostantino623

4 жыл бұрын

With the Coolpix?

@Colazsmithtv

4 жыл бұрын

@@arturocostantino623 lol

very interesting video

I actually use a COOLPIX L840 with its 38X optical zoom an 4X digital (of which I have found that using up to 2X digital can yield decent results if needed). It's an okay camera, but good cheap fun for $100 US.

Hi mate good job, if ur not worried about size and weight should i got the p1000? My main recording is long zoom Does the p950 have any advantages over it? Thanks mate 👍

LOL best one yet! you guys are a riot!

Just one question: where’d you get the Clorox wipes in the last shot?

You crack me up. Great video - extremely useful and very funny. I love your style. Sub'd.

I literally laughed out loud from the 5G explanation! Love the flat earth jokes :) ... EDIT ... 3 minutes later ... I could not stop rewinding over and over and over again to listen to the 5Gs... It's 2am and I've been listening to Chris say "thats too much government" for 3 solid minutes and I'm still laughing out loud. Why is this so funny? #coronavirus

@johngault1407

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/dXlptbaslJngoLQ.html

@johngault1407

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/dXlptbaslJngoLQ.html

@mikeslemonade

Жыл бұрын

When you realize flat earth isn’t a joke 🤯.

Thanks guys for this review. The @Nikon #P950 is pretty specialized Digital Crazy-Ultrazoom Bridge Camera. The sensor size 1/2.3" is probably a compromise for body size and massive focal range. =>> Hope the next update will have a touchscreen... a 20MP sensor? 1" sensor vs 1/2.3" sensor: Exception for the P950 other specialized compact cameras like Ricoh WG series, Olympus Tough, Fuji FinePix... I am wondering if the 1" shouldn't be the minimum for coming compact cameras? 1" and + (1", MFT, 1.5", APSC, FF) A 1" sensor, optics + pretty advanced features in cameras today should close the false debate between (1) smartphones (devices that have some photography features/capabilities) and (2) digital cameras (specialized devices dedicated to take photographs) Wondering if @Nikon will add a 1" sensor hybrid bridge superzoom camera within its #Coolpix Line? (Like the cancelled DL24-500, but capable to face or rival #RX10M4, #G3X, #Vlux5, #FZ1000M2, #FZ2000 / #FZ2500) Technology creates and kill, with smartphones, people taste and interest for photography downgrading... there is no really room for a lot of cameras in the market. Camera companies have to review their lines. I like bridge, ... I started to take photography seriously with a 1/2.3" sensor Canon Bridge (SX530HS) before I moved to EOS200D and EOS90D. Bridge cameras are pretty relevant to me, like other compacts (point and shoot + Advanced compact) you have a lot a lot of features in one body (DSLR + Mirrorless features for bridge)... But camera companies should have less products, but add all in one body (EVF? -> GX5 II vs GX7 III). =>> Why not a Mic Jack in the #P950?

So p1000 or p950?

Interesting video

Would this camera be suitable for a very beginner wanting to take pictures of birds, bees, flowers? What about for those that have a bit of a shake to their hand?

Literally laughed out loud at the ‘visited’ 🤣

I left Calgary in 1997, but I remember Impark. when did they take over?

Shoving the lens into the object of interest (flower) to stabilize it is good thinking.

More fun from Calgary!

Nice boots Chris. Cheers

This became the Camera Conspiracy Channel for a second 😂👽

Like the FE references. Just got my P950.

good stuff buddy

Impressive it has that good of quality with a sensor smaller than my s20 ultra phone.

awesome Chris..learned a lot about 5G...

This video was freaking hilarious 😂

Nice video , I own a canon cropped sensor DSLR camera, I want to upgrade my setup for bird and wildlife photography but for that a minimum of 400mm lens is needed which is as costly as Nikon P 950,should I consider purchasing a new lens or this camera. What would you suggest?

Pretty good. For a moment I thought you said Covid 950 at around 4:33 and 7:47.

9:26 great one

Hello Sir ek question h ki kya hum Nikon coolpix P950 camera se live streaming kr sakte hai... Plz answer

I enjoyed your review thoroughly! I have a Nikon Coolpix B500 with a 40x zoom. However, it’s only 40x or 900mm for moon mode. Otherwise, for bird watching or in auto mode, it’s only 440mm. How about the p950 or p900? What focal length can you get for bird watching? Thanks so much for the review. You’re pretty funny too!

@letni9506

2 жыл бұрын

The B500 is equivalent to 900mm at 40x zoom. I have a B700 which is 1440mm and a P950 which is 2000mm. I've used a B500 and it was tricky to use not having an evf and the stabilization is pretty bad compared to the other two. The P950 is great but expensive.Heavier too. Not as good battery life. The B700 i've used 3 days before changing the battery. The P950 has better dynamic range though and i've had sharp images at full zoom. But you cant beat the B700 for value. Its a step up from the B500 but i had to find a second hand one on Ebay. If you have the money and don't mind the weight hands down the p950 is the best. All these cameras are best used in good light though. Had some very bad results on murky days.

Hi thx but which one would you recommend for video. The p950 or Sony RX 10 IV thx again

Hi..I have one of these camera’s and go to a lot of Rodeo’s that are at night time to take photo’s of the bulls in action but with this camera the photo’s are all blurry it takes action photo’s during the day pretty good but at night not so good is there a manual setting that I can set it too so I’m able to take action photo’s at night???

I'm tossing up between a 900 and 950, mainly for moon shots, the 900 is 900aud and the 950 is 1100aud. A solid tripod and I'm guessing I need a DSLRKIT Tripod Mount Ring Quick Release Plate for NIKON AF-S 80-200mm. Am I on the right track here? TIA

Hallo, I would like to buy this camera but I'm wondering if it has such options like: Car lights, lighting graffiti,silk water, plus stars trace? Thx for info

I bought my bridge camera in 2013 which has 1000mm (35mm equivalent) with SMALL SENSOR, which show me the earth is flat, thank you Chris to prove it again.

@Aarvind07

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

I love the box of ramen as a laptop stand!

I'm going to buy the p950

Love my P950. The small sensor doesn't bother me. If I want to bump the quality I take pano stitched photos. The review doesn't mention the improved buffer which reduced the lag time between photos and the increase in the number of burst shots.

@galshev

2 жыл бұрын

Is it a point & shoot camera or it's for professional only?

@heroninja1125

11 ай бұрын

​@@galshevbridge camera, it's half in between a point and shoot, and a "professional camera" solid features and zoom, but quality is not amazing.

@galshev

11 ай бұрын

@@heroninja1125 Thank you! It's a lille bit too late😏 I got the camera & I like it.

Hey guys, can you tell me if Nikon chaged the EV range problem I had with my P900.... With the P900 you could set ISO-100 and a 30 sec exposure, if you wanted ISO-200 you could only have a 15 sec shutter, ISO-400 - 7 sec and so on, does the P950 still have the same limitation?

If you don't mind the larger size and weight, the Nikon P1000 is a little more expensive and with a 24 mm to 3000mm (35mm equivalent) instead of 24-2000mm (35 equivalent). It is a better choice. The difference between 2000mm and 3000mm is huge. I have the older P900 with 24 mm to 2000mm (35 equivalent) like the updated P950. Only with daylight you can shoot handheld at 2000mm without high ISO noise. With a cloudy weather at 2000mm a tripod is essential for noise free photos. A monopod is more than necessary with such a camera. Despite the large size and weight of P950 and P1000 cameras, their sensors is really small 1/2.3 inch type. A typical sensor size of most small pocket digital cameras. That of course won't deliver the equal image quality of APS-C or full frame sensors. The P900, P950, P1000 are more a marketing trick than cameras with real super telephoto lenses.It is easy to achieve very narrow angle of view with very small sensors. If you spent double the money buy a Sony a7 full frame camera with the Sigma 150-600mm full frame lens and the sigma MC-11. Afterwards you can crop with similar quality of the P950.

@yolandari526

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you

The only question I have is would you buy one?

Is it a point & shoot camera or it's for professional only? I want a point & shoot camera .

My camera 👍👍👍

I have 1 question. Who is your master?

Is this technically an advance on the P1000? You answered the question. Thanks.

Guys l have a p900 and am looking to upgrade due to raw and 4K, currently the p900 is doing all l need as a family camera of HD video of soccer games no issues etc however l am stuck between the Sony cyber shot 10 IV and Nikon P950. I have seen a lot of reviews and all call out the larger sensor of Sony however when l look at the quality shots of your gallery and other professional using the P950 and l think wow they are as good as Sony to naked eye. Am l missing something here in my uneducated viewing as l am low end of amateur by the way. The Sony is awesome and it’s fantastic with 1 inch sensor too, however both cameras do great shots and hard to tell the difference to an amateur like me. After seeing what you did with the P950 gallery, l think the p950 is amazing and comparable to Sony, the P950 had some great shots and the clarity is amazing at distance. What is your recommendation as the price point is large here between the cameras considering the visual result to my naked eye to justify Sony. Happy to shell out if you think that Sony is better bang for buck but l look at the overall results and they see similar am l missing something here? Appreciate your thoughts….

The Sony a7R4 has a 61 megapixel full frame sensor. The P1000 has 16 megapixels. As far as I can see, you can crop an image taken with Sony's a7R4 to a quarter of the original image and then obtain the same resolution as with the P1000 = 16 megapixels, which in that case would mean that a correct comparison between an image taken with the P1000 and 3000mm and sony with 2X teleconverter and 600mm = 1200mm corresponds to an image of 4 x 1200= 4800mm if you use Sony and crop to the same 16 megapixel resolution. Am I right or wrong? On the other hand, if the largest aperture that the P1000 has in the 3000mm = 8 mode, Sony's zoom 200-600mm with teleconverter cannot measure up to this, since the Sony zoom is at aperture 6.3 at 600mm and with the 2x converter loses a step to aperture 11 ? I think it will be. How do other properties such as dynamic range and other important features of the P1000's tiny sensor compare to Sony's full frame, even if you only use a quarter of it when you crop the image ???

This was actually funny video, makes my day better when needed to be inside. Hahah.

@rexluminus9867

3 жыл бұрын

You just get out in the SUN.Walk a lot....etc!!!***.D,D3 vitamine.

How long will the battery last

Chris looks 5 years younger now that he has dyed his hair and beard. Go Chris go go, you are doing a good job, good reviews, thank you.

@erincthomson

4 жыл бұрын

No dye, he's au natural

Hey Chris, love watching the reviews, but I have a question, which compact do you suggest with a decent zoom and a good macro setting, I destroyed my wifes compact nikon when shooting some video, Dont want to spend more than about $700 canadian, she will use it for flowers and birds in the garden.

@odahon

4 жыл бұрын

John H Pettigrew FZ1000 but not sure about the macro

The lack of a lens hood is triggering me...

Did I miss it or they did not talk about the lack of GPS?

Cheesus approves this video! Flat-Heads like DP Review!

Just curious, is that 2000mm all optical zoom, or is there some digital zoom at the end?

@robertcetl7358

4 жыл бұрын

it's all optical up to 2000mm (i've got the P900), you can go past that but then it gets digital and not really worth the bother.

This video contains most of my favourite conspiracies! 😆

Kindly Advise me Dp review team i want to buy camera for video shoot and photography which one is best from this two camera. Sony a6600 or Fujiflim Xt30

I like your humour!

The conspiracies parts where the best haha

The future of hyperzooms - bigger sensor: 1/1.7" at least. Faster lens - those are big already, we can dig bigger but faster. And computensional algorithms from Google Pixel to get those composite DNG files. And then we'll talk.

Government government government government government! CORONA confirmed!!

Did Nikon put the screw mount for the tripod in the center of the camera? The p900 has it off center and scares me.

Thanks. I have a Samsung Galaxy S8, It has a lot of features to take photographs.... Technology : Quick>>>> Shoot+Edit with filters +Share. But with my old 1/2.3" sensor Canon Bridge (SX530HS), I explored deeper the world of digital photography, my bridge made me love more spending time, compose and take photographs. I used films cameras before and a bunch of point and shoot. But this little Canon was the key. I take better photographs with the bridge than my smartphone. The sensor size was not a problem for me at that time Using the bridge made understand photography and after, I was able to use better the pro features of my smartphone. My wife has the same smartphone, and she's always complaining "how are you able to take better photo with the same cellphone than me"... She used to check my settings JAJAJAJA My experience... A- Smartphone Photography is Quick... is selfie,... you are in a rush to post on social medias for quick views and likes... You can't slow down when you are looking for a lot of views My last trip in Havana, I saw a lot of people taking selfies, but have NO clues of the places, the sites there were visiting, don't ask them the name, the story of the cathedral behind their faces... they don't know... B- Digital Camera Photography is a long process, you need to have time, interest and money (I must admit it's an expensive hobby). A real photographer takes time to compose, take and edit the shot... Of course, most of them will tell more about the cathedral... they know they have to tell a story of their shots , if asked... I guess Camera companies, photographers, and everyone in this industry must adapt to new trends and this new era... :) instagram.com/paulginoulysse/?hl=en

Is it better than the p1000

yayayayayyay another FE 'er i just saw the obvious in dec .last year and im still super glad when i hear how many are seeing it yayyyayayay and btw this is why i want this camera

@logitech4873

2 жыл бұрын

It's a joke.