Some would say more boring ... you'd say more realistic ... I say more useful. Thanks for doing what you do.

@silent00planet

Жыл бұрын

interesting video but does not add anything pity we continue to hope for an explanation for reality that does not require religion

@HxTurtle

Жыл бұрын

@@silent00planet ultimately, it does require religion, though. or however you wanna call it. physical conjecture require falsifiability, which ends at the horizon of the observable universe. however it came into existence did in fact require some creation process. yes, it's highly unlikely the any earthly religion actually figure anything realistically, but no imagination, however weird, can ultimately be ruled out. mind that most physicists constantly talk about God, a creator, or any form or sort of a divine force. they just apply this word in a very different way to actually religious people. but how nature's constants actually came into existence is beyond the scope of science. and more generally speaking: people should stop expecting to ever get a comprehensive explanation of reality. religion is like a, "I simply imagine it and insist if being in the right"-case with too low a probability to be correct and science is indeed constantly evolving and updating itself. so, it's illogical to ever expect a like a final draft. just some random thoughts, lol.

@ohanlonj8476

Жыл бұрын

😮‍💨

@3kinformaticamanutencaoeve91

Жыл бұрын

@@silent00planet what religion? or what is a religion? or better: I can say that scientism is a religion. My hope is that Sabine is not a member of it

@3kinformaticamanutencaoeve91

Жыл бұрын

@@HxTurtle They, scientificism ou scientism defenders or even without knowing belief that science is an entity. They think per si science can bring all that we need or expose what we reject. But science is abstract and always put on a being the claims about what is questioning. Thus surround science and including science in a whole doing that science can bring elucidations. So all linguistics of all beings is always needed to we have good science.

Thank you for being realistic. It's not boring, it's refreshing.

@ericvosselmans5657

Жыл бұрын

definitely more refreshing than all the overhyped hypes combined

@smlanka4u

Жыл бұрын

Big Bounce is more reaistic than Big Bang. A supreme person in india explained the Big Bounce process 2500 years ago.

@tami6867

Жыл бұрын

yes it is. i'm so annoyed by all this almost sudo science news outlets. With Sabine i'm watching a 15min Video a week an cnan be sure to be up to date.

@giyanvice

Жыл бұрын

The way you present your content makes all the difference if the video is going to be boring or not. I do not have problem watching your other videos, but I do find some problems with your news segment though. Especially when you are transitioning from one news topic to another news topic. I would rather say there is no transition or clear cut start and ending at all. People need time to process all of that new information or news as we call it, and you are basically going one after another news without any gap in between what so ever. Just put a blank black screen in the video for a second, when you are moving from one news to another news headline. It is never a good idea to plough through any informative video. Thanks.

@lorenzoblum868

Жыл бұрын

The carbon /toxicity footprint of the elephant in the room aka the military industrial complex is not boring.

Where have you been all my life?! I love this straightforward, non-hype science news with great explanations. You got a new loyal subscriber.

@Thomas-gk42

Жыл бұрын

Welcome 😊

@potatosalad68

Жыл бұрын

Yes, she definitely deserves her subscribers. I'm a relatively new one too

@BoyProdigyX

Жыл бұрын

Mostly brains, with a bit of funny-bone... It eases the insertion of information haha

@giyanvice

Жыл бұрын

The way you present your content makes all the difference if the video is going to be boring or not. I do not have problem watching your other videos, but I do find some problems with your news segment though. Especially when you are transitioning from one news topic to another news topic. I would rather say there is no transition or clear cut start and ending at all. People need time to process all of that new information or news as we call it, and you are basically going one after another news without any gap in between what so ever. Just put a blank black screen in the video for a second, when you are moving from one news to another news headline. It is never a good idea to plough through any informative video. Thanks.

@SteveLevy-ld7hl

Жыл бұрын

Santa Clase 0 seconds ago Santa Clase 0 seconds ago tiMe Travller dUdE...hAvine soMe tiMe travller wEEd... EyE Come In Pice...& somtiMes its callEd om🕉🕉🕉.witCh meAns peaCe...you See it but doN't understand what it means... yuo as in you...UUU..1 Day it wiLL BEE 2 late 4 for you... How Fing duMb r YOU...peace be with you🕉🐝🥰1..This is peace in mAny world8... BuT YouRs,,,.Can EyE Ask WhAY PleASe🕉🕉🕉

That quantum repeaters repetition joke, though. 🤣

@XmarkedSpot

Жыл бұрын

That quantum repeaters repetition joke, though. 🤣

@AndrewBlucher

Жыл бұрын

Sorry, can you repeat that?

I've never been bored. My friends will call you dry, but I've always found every single one of your videos almost mesmerizingly brilliant. Thank you for doing what you do. You are my favorite science educator/journalist

@AbbStar1989

Жыл бұрын

Dry is the best. It means you are down to earth and keeping things real.

I thought Penrose does not speak of a previous contracting universe. I think he says that once that universe loses all sense of time and distance it can conformally transform into a new expanding universe.

@frun

Жыл бұрын

Yes, that's precisely how CCC works.

@Thomas-gk42

Жыл бұрын

Cyclic, like a repeating bounce. In CCC size, dimensions of space becoming meaningless at the end.

@silent00planet

Жыл бұрын

that is his model but perhaps this can be made analogous or similar to a bounce

@Jinkypigs

Жыл бұрын

And what phenomenal will that "losing all sense of time and distance" be like? LOL.

@ianmccurdy1223

Жыл бұрын

@@Thomas-gk42 A 'bounce' would imply two distinct phases though - a fall and a rise (analogous to a contraction and expansion of the universe). This metaphor doesn't really apply to CCC since there's no contraction

Sabina,You always help me understand the universe a little better with every video you produce thank you

@silent00planet

Жыл бұрын

on the contrary, despite all the research papers, observations, and summaries by the lady we are none the wiser about the universe

@rodkeh

Жыл бұрын

@@silent00planet Especially since everything she says is rife with lies and disinformation! That is the conman's trick, they include a few snippets of fact and a few particles of truth in a slurry of lies and disinformation, so it seems to be true to the scientifically uneducated public.

@marioluigi9599

Жыл бұрын

It's not Sabina, it's Sabine. Pronounced zah-bee-nuh (not nah)

@schrimpf

Жыл бұрын

@@marioluigi9599Wrong! The pronunciation is Saa-bee-neee….

@marioluigi9599

Жыл бұрын

@@schrimpf Haha, I don't think so.

😲 You're not boring, Sabine! You're smart and funny and we love you! ❤❤❤❤

@3kinformaticamanutencaoeve91

Жыл бұрын

I think she is smart but she thinks are few people by her side to bring us real evidences of very usefull teories and solutions. I think she would read Wolfgang Smith about quantizations and qualifications of what regards about matter. If she did the readings maybe she bring this excellent thinker on this very wonderfull channel.

Your reports are absolutly NOT boring. You're one of the best science reporters on youtub!!

@marioluigi9599

Жыл бұрын

Yeah but she's going against the atheistic narrative, which is a problem because the big bounce is important to atheists. She's starting to go towards a big rip, that's being religious and God destroying the universe in a rip for being angry at humanity

Dr Sabine, I am NOT tired of you going on about Meta-materials.

There seems to be an idea that corporations are singularities at which money pops into being, rather than obtaining money from elsewhere by providing goods or services, or cadging subsidies from governments. If corporations had to pay somebody (us? Governments? Animal sanctuaries?), the money would ultimately come from us.

@dougaltolan3017

Жыл бұрын

Or... There seems to be an idea that corporations are singularities at which money just vanishes, rather than paying wages, buying stock and materials, or paying fines and taxes to governments. If you live in a society that is regulated by money (as in capitalism), what better way to highlight and compensate for harm than tarrifs? Remember that consumers are at least as much to blame for corporations' activities as the corporations are themselves.

@c0d3warrior

Жыл бұрын

This is just another attempt to siphon the money of average people into the pockets of priviledged oligarchs posing as activists. Trickle-up economy as usual.

@justinwatson1510

Жыл бұрын

Every single dollar of corporate profits comes from labor performed by the people who are exploited by them. This idea that corporations themselves generate money or create jobs is ludicrous and the result of the most successful disinformation campaign in the history of humanity. Corporations are glorified thieves.

@svachalek

Жыл бұрын

But not necessarily equally. If one company dumps all of its waste into the ocean while another disposes of it responsibly, you will seem to save money by buying the first company’s cheaper goods but ultimately everyone will pay for it later. The idea is that if you shift the cost to now instead of later, people can make more rational cost comparisons.

@ThePowerLover

Жыл бұрын

@@svachalek Sure, Apple profit more for people richer than you.

Es freut mich sehr, so viel Neues mit Ihnen zu lernen, Frau Doktor! 😊

So would we call hackers of water based computers "splashers"?

@noyou1114

Жыл бұрын

It would be a crime not to

Love your sense of humor , Thank you for the realistic update

After seeing the part about using water as a computer I’m starting to wonder if you could perhaps make a video about various forms of non conventional computing and theoretical computers other than quantum computers. Like for example how powerful could a fully mechanical computer be if it was built with nanoscopic components? Or how different a DNA computer would function compared to a digital one? Then there’s things like Ternary computing, Reversible computing and Stochastic computing. Maybe others would like that as well? I don’t know but it could be interesting.

@mikeg9b

Жыл бұрын

Veritasium made some videos about analog computers: kzread.info/dash/bejne/e5t6lbGRaNG6YNo.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/eYqnt7Gug83ck8o.html

@AttilaAsztalos

Жыл бұрын

Water as a computing medium is a 70+ year old concept - google "MONIAC"...

My neurons are experiencing entanglement right now. And they are threatening me with rebellion if I continue on this path of watching never ending speculation.

@havenbastion

Жыл бұрын

The cutting edge of science is always speculation; a search for the right metaphor to fit the data.

Excellent broadcast, love hearing the truth without the grift by people riding a train without knowing where they are going, or coming from. Thanks, Sabine🌷

Currently reading Existential Physics, which is absolutely fascinating, and now found this channel, so happy! Thank you for engaging with a wider audience without "dumbing down" the information. Absolute brain food and I'm so glad to be a new subscriber.

Your videos make me feel like I can have an, at least rudimentary, understanding of the topics.

@LaurieAnnCurry

Жыл бұрын

This

@dexocube

Жыл бұрын

Yes

Thanks for all the awesome science news. 😊 I appreciate all your hard work and your thoughtful review.

Love your conversations with Albert.

Thanks for the news, Sabine! 😊 Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

I always love your reports, because it always presents things in a realistic way.

Thank you for another wonderful video! And yes, your skepticism is wonderful. It's extremely useful to balance out the general tone of starry eyed optimism that we get pretty everywhere else science is discussed.

Interesting news on using solitions to store and compute chaotic systems. I have just read through the paper and I am interested in when some practical work is done with optical and matter-wave solitons - it seems like liquid solitions are vastly easier to build and the results seem promising so far! The one timestep prediction on page 5 lines up amazingly with the experimental data (although I am not so sure how useful this information is - I don't have an understanding of the amount of error after just a cursory glance). Thanks for the share.

@Laff700

Жыл бұрын

I'm fairly interested in the usage of topological solitons in analog computing. I wonder what we could do with nematic fluid solitons. I'm also interested in what PDEs a system would have to obey to have Turing-complete computation.

@Unmannedair

Жыл бұрын

Unless I'm mistaken, solitons are the primary form of action in Squid devices. I would think a magnetic soliton in a planar squid would be faster and more reliable than a liquid analog.

@Laff700

Жыл бұрын

@@Unmannedair Fair point, I should look into those more too.

Thanks a lot Sabine

computing with water... we have done that, started with Lukyanov's "water integrator" (which was not a computer, more a calculator), until some time in the 80s when electronic computers became efficient enough.

This isn't a criticism of past videos but you seem really on point in this video, makes it more engaging for some reason

Please review the density driven gravity hypothesis. You are amazing! ❤

Thank you Sabine. I never knew there was so much to be confused about. Keep up the good work.

Absolutely not boring! I'm always glad about a new video!

Kudos for mentioning Weinberg's book, still the best way to learn GR. I don't think the people who run their mouths even understand the basics of Riemannian geometry.

@bryanfinegan5252

Жыл бұрын

Some people don't even understand the basics of Vogon poetry either!

Sabine, I love your channels. However anonymity is a good thing, at least a certain amount of it is. I really like watching your channel morph into other branches of science. Kudos to you and your staff 👏 👍

Such a gentle, polite, and compassionate debunk. Great video as usual.

What a great introduction and first few minutes! That summary of run of the mill science news articles and press releases was superb Burst out laughing at the first phonecall - spooky

“Somewhat of a stretch….” I love your knee slappers!!!

Am I going crazy or does the sound sounds pitched up a bit? It is a rough contrast to all other videos. Everything else is great like always!

@JosefStepanek

Жыл бұрын

Sabine is not wearing a visible lapel mic, so maybe she was testing a shotgun mic or some different setup. Let's hope it will smooth out in future videos.

@SabineHossenfelder

Жыл бұрын

Yes, different microphone. We are sorting out some glitches with the audio processing. Next week should be better (hopefully)

@victorkrutyanskiy768

9 ай бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder Just need to repeat it couple of times. Thanks for the great review :)

I had to do an exam essay today on the thought experiment of Laplaces demon; examining determinism and implications on free will; I cited your paper where you mention Superdeterminism and I’m grateful to you for all you’ve taught me as well as probably giving me some extra marks for originality

Loved it all. Good work. Your brain = awesome as usual.

Oh but I want the universe to be a big bouncy castle.

@Sylfa

Жыл бұрын

With enough determination, and energy, anything can be a bouncy castle!

@nova_supreme8390

Жыл бұрын

If it makes you feel any better, it is already a massive ballpit although the balls are pretty far apart.

@ivarbrouwer197

Жыл бұрын

P.s. max one case number per bounched universe please…

@classifiedtopsecret4664

Жыл бұрын

@@nova_supreme8390 you said "balls" 😂

@Eyes0penNoFear

Жыл бұрын

Canada would never accept it. They already showed the world what they think of bouncy castles.

Did you re-record the audio for this video? If so, much respect, your dubbing/editing skills are top notch. If not, then how did you manage to get that ultra dry, close mic-ed sound, without using a clip-on? Inquiring minds need to know...

@SabineHossenfelder

Жыл бұрын

There is a microphone next to my head, but we've cut it off. We're still fumbling with the audio processing tho.

@Mefistofy

Жыл бұрын

So you did overdub the entire video? Did not notice it without this comment. Some unsolicited advice: I had some experience with the AVX MKE2 from Sennheiser, really nice lavalier microphone, just a little expensive. If you want to use a shotgun microphone and want that nice, dry sound, you might need to dampen the room a lot but I guess you already know that.

@samvimes5124

Жыл бұрын

@@SabineHossenfelder Thank you.

@Hyxtryx

Жыл бұрын

@@Mefistofy "So you did overdub the entire video?" She's not "lip syncing", if that's what you mean.

@Mefistofy

Жыл бұрын

@@Hyxtryx Ok, that's what I understood.

Another excellent distilled roundup :>

Thank you very much for the news.

Imagine if there really was a big bounce and the universe is fully deterministic. Infinite repeating loop 😳

@carlospenalver8721

Жыл бұрын

One way to prove the big bounce although highly improbable is if the exact edge of the universe is determined and coined the mask where all things are contained then outside of that mask/envelope there are the presence of galaxies and universes that through studies can be verified to being older then what’s inside our universe and amongst that group some show to be from another timeline unrelated to one another meaning each may have been left overs from individual expansions and contractions. I wouldn’t hold my breath tho since it would take perhaps trillions of years before the data from the first mission to reach back . Have a nice day 😁

@EgonSorensen

Жыл бұрын

It imagine it would be ∞ bouncing and now 'rotating', --> 8 Since there wouldn't be an up/down to relate to, if you could see it from far away it would be: ~1/0 going to 0/1~ (and back again) = ∞8∞...

@FLPhotoCatcher

Жыл бұрын

@Andrew Ballard I knew you would say that.

@dorinchirila4322

Жыл бұрын

Time is the drift of gravity. Big Bam is nonsense.

@lonesomealeks4206

Жыл бұрын

The Universe is a fractal endlessly repeating itself in space and time...Existence is meaningless, the idea of a God is a bad joke.

15:36 Hazel Henderson the economist proposed something like 40 years ago. It would be like determining the costs of say damage cars and trucks do to roads and tax them accordingly. Like trucks do a lot of damage to roadbeds, road surfaces, and bridges than cars, and the real cost is never paid by them or the companies that use them. It's an actual means of fair taxation. Thanks for posting. Way cool.

@lawrencedoliveiro9104

Жыл бұрын

I remember reading about a study some years back that said the wear and tear on roads was proportional to the sixth power of the axle loading. So a big truck with, say, twice the weight on each axle compared to a passenger car, would be doing 64 times the damage to the road.

@eottoe2001

Жыл бұрын

@@lawrencedoliveiro9104 didn't know that, but thanks for the insight.

Thanks for Sharing Sabine ☕

Will the phone ring?

I love the consequences created by charging oil companies for climate change as this will likely cause gas prices to reach $100/gallon, and flights go to $5000 to fly from New York to Chicago. Do any of these climate people realize the climate has fluxgate from the origins of time, and that the only real problem is that politicians are only really focused on making sure THEY CAN PROFIT FROM IT while we pay the bill?

@Eyes0penNoFear

Жыл бұрын

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

I don't think your content is boring, I actually quite enjoy how straightforward and matter of factly you are, it makes things easier to follow and understand without it being dumbed down

Glad to see you back with the science

Please stop the climate alarmism… You seem too smart to fall for that.

@duelenigma7732

Жыл бұрын

You sound like you know everything already….why bother watching? Your comment is stupid and ignorant, you have fossae fuel stocks or something, Mr know it all?

@ThePowerLover

Жыл бұрын

The problem is the type of "climate" alarmism.

Oh yes, I completely trust when a group of sociologists come up with something related to the physical sciences... 😂. Reparations... 🤦 And where do the geniuses propose that the reparations are going to come from? More fossil fuel production? You think sociologists would be more interested in, I don't know, fixing problems in society? Funny thing that... Can't think of a single social problem so far that has actually been fixed by a sociologist... All studies, and no results. 🤨

@juddnichol8504

Жыл бұрын

Reparations.The UK West african Squadron. Allowed independence. Almost all slaves bought brought 95% of all landed on the islands. Who now own the Caribbean.

@Unmannedair

Жыл бұрын

Interesting.... I see that there have been 2 replies, but they're both missing. Someone must have upset the algorithm.

@vikkiiam3083

Жыл бұрын

How can the geniuses fix the problem when the problem is their thinking ? The goal is not to solve problems but create problems so they can claim to have solutions to fix the problem with thing like Extortion .

@achenarmyst2156

Жыл бұрын

Physicists study relations in the material sphere, sociologists do the same in the societal sphere. Concerning the question of accountability: are physicists better in answering that question?

you got so much more comfortable vs old videos. Its like the confort level is correlated to the square of how many videos you make.

I'm really grateful that i get to learn from you

First

Show me someone advocating reparations and I'll show you someone who wants a payday, not solutions.

Second! Good topics to discuss! Thanks for another great video!

I liked your caveat emptor ending at 01:43 mm:ss. I need to balance my defecit budget before I can support you directly or Ground News financially. Please keep up the good work, it's helping to familiarize me with the process of cutting through the hype around scientific papers.

I was so happy there were helpful arrows with a nice caption to tell me that Sabine was not being dismissive. I might have been confused otherwise.

Love it that Albert called to Sabine's news broadcast.

Many many thanks explaining things i don't understand in a way i can understand

8:25 "it's like you can retweet Elon without reading what he wrote" this got a chuckle out of me. Thank you Sabine! ^^

Thank you

Wow! New microphone! Congratulations!

Thank goodness for a "realistic" view. I appreciate it!

Nothing like being impartially realistic and grounded on proven facts! Ma goyal! Keep it up!

I love your sarcasm: hysterical! Very entertaining!

Thanks for the news update. I like this very much. And to be realistic is the only way things to go further, because in the end everything else fails but took amounts of money before. But as a suggestion, maybe you can look into older science news and see, whats going on with that TODAY, if there is anything. Would be nice to see progress in things newly found.

They explanation I gave my youngest son was simple. The universe expands but eventually collapses as black holes which also combine and eventually contain so much energy they react and expand/explode.

Thanks for the video :)

Wicked sense of humor. Love it!

I loved this format

😀 Really curious and informative !!!

Sabine Hossenfelder, the Beauty of Science!

Brilliant, love your show.

Not boring at all! 🔥🔥

Super interesting.

This episode was packed

I appreciate your "grounded" explanations. In a future video would you please explain "2-D" objects? How can graphene be called 2-D when it is one atom thick?

Fantastic channel!

Keep it up Sabine

I read all the science books in my high school, in the 60's, so I have a deep understanding of many scientific concepts and theories, I even have a bare grasp of some quantum physics ideas, some that is, this left me completely baffled,

@abody499

Жыл бұрын

Yeah things have moved since the 60s, although hippies are still frowned upon.

💖Sabine, you are divine. 💖

Great Video!

#1 Source of Information based on understandable Facts!

Keeping its real. Another great video.

9:14 it took centuries to go from mysticism and astrology to Aristotle, then to Newton, then to Einstein, then to Hawking. The “spooky action” happens with qbits whether we understand it or not, so ultimately it’s as inaccessible as predicting the weather or climate change.

I would like to hear more about emergent gravity. I heard there is an old feynman lecture about it, then verlinde theory and then the role of unruh effect and horizon for all particles

Thank you.

I haven't done the numbers (I don't think It is even possible), but I have a quite strong intuitions about it. Fossil fuel companies may owe US for the damage in the environment several orders of magnitud LESS than what WE owe them for the construction of our civilization.

I prefer your "boring" and as I agree realistic view on science news over what is spewed out by other places.

I was a big sci-fi and science fan for a long time, but got really tired of mainstream science news, where they make it sound like there's a life-changing breakthrough every week, and then nothing actually happens. This channel is not boring, it's actually exciting, because it covers reality, not some fantasy world where everything can happen, but nothing does.

I think it applies to a lot of situations to say that working out who is to blame is not a productive use of anyone's time

We, the people, are lucky to have you, Sabine. Never take your foot off their throats...

Uttering the words "science" and "a group of sociologists" in the same sentence without bursting into laughter is a testament to your skills as an actress.

Great video as always, but what happened to the microphone quality?

The elastic and rebound (shockwaves) characteristics of atoms has been long known, so yeah, interpretation is a huge factor in this model. Thanks for being realistic.

Penrose's model doesn't shrink anything. There's no "bounce". It's like... Imagine you get to a point in an exponential function where it's so inclined that it actually becomes vertical. At that point, you define a new origin, rotate and rescale your axes, and start over. I think this analogy shows the "no bounce" part I was referring to.

I absolutely love you sense of humor, always a pleasure to see your videos,. Cheers from Chile❤

The best cyclic model is Stoyan Sargs, Basic Structures of Matter - Supergravitation Unified theory. The cyclic element is not the universe, but the galaxies. The cycle time is between 8-12 billion years, depending on different parameters. Gamma-ray bursts are the signature, short one is the collapse and the long one is a birth. It is observed of very high star forming rates after a long gamma ray burst. Globular clusters and cephaid stars are fossiles of the previous cycle. It also easily explains the first paper, c is derived and not all parameters are constants. One is the CL-Node distance which is mass depended and explains the relativistic time change on mass objects. All forces of the standard model are derived effects in BSM-SG. It also implements a proper quantum gravity effect that depends on the geometric structure of the nucleus. It is absurd to assume there is no structure in the proton neutron configuration of the nucleus. Molecular structures and Cosmological effects actually confirm the internal buildup. The background radiation is also derived, actually quite simply by applying the dynamic vacuum pressure to the surface of the hydrogen atom assuming a ideal gas behavior and you are in 1% accuracy. The dynamic vacuum pressure varies form galaxy to galaxy, also freshly born galaxies have a higher energy for some million years. What you can see in those CBR pictures is that galaxies sync their cycles with their neighbors. Those low energy regions can in some future time become a large void for a few billion years and then pop up into those very energy dense clouds after some more billion years. Also, the galactic redshift is a derived effect. The assumption of the standard model that all matter is the same, is wrong. Simply test matter from another galaxy or a globular cluster in a particle accelerator. You can start with meteorites, they have a chance of being from another cycle. They reinvented the water computer, kzread.info/dash/bejne/mH-cqLqqf8W9p7w.html ;-)