Click here to watch more “48 Hours” full episodes: kzread.info/head/PLcFHkKbd_jTJiRmfUfLX2Ay_hnf5j3cxH

@jasondaley718

18 күн бұрын

We need more stories from nyc

@dialaschannel9506

18 күн бұрын

0ppp

@theoryofpersonality1420

18 күн бұрын

You just remade an old az show and twisted the facts.

@esthernene5819

17 күн бұрын

​

@michaelsinclair3321

17 күн бұрын

God is shedding light on many things and man is working just as hard to keep them hidden

Sometimes I feel the jurors are really stupid

@gcrichman53

18 күн бұрын

The jury in OJ'S criminal trial certainly were very stupid and biased.

@nychris2258

18 күн бұрын

So was the suspect... it was a jury of his peers.

@RullXov

18 күн бұрын

🙄

@stasa-X

18 күн бұрын

I guess you are the smart one 🤣!!!

@poojapatole3573

18 күн бұрын

@@stasa-Xthe jurors are not even sure of their own decision. Im not saying he’s not guilty but if there is doubt they can’t just give a verdict that he was the killer. On what basis? They were assuming things. An innocent person can go to the prison for a crime they didn’t commit because they didn’t show emotions that fit the norm.

These old episodes are far superior than the newer ones. No melodrama or ridiculous fillers.

@strictlynorton

18 күн бұрын

Totally agree, also a complete lack of ridiculous female vocal frys from contributors. Post 2020 episodes are unwatchable.

@timmytwotone65

18 күн бұрын

Yea agree 💯

@Velvety_Teets

18 күн бұрын

@@strictlynorton agreed! Seems everything post 2020 is ridiculous IMO lol

@cynthiakritika5047

18 күн бұрын

And way juicer crimes back then. That’s weird to say but it’s true lol

@LoraHari81

18 күн бұрын

Absolutely!

As a juror you have to put your emotions to the side. The facts here are there is no evidence to convict him. Nothing. How could you send a man to jail with nothing but accusations. Complete failure of a jury.

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

Yeah, whether Danny did it or not is something I guess we'll never know, but that jury didn't even seem sure of their decision. I can't believe his appeal was denied!

@Tero92

18 күн бұрын

Nah, him and her did it 100%, but with her the original og, the King of all Kings allready had giver her the ultimate sentence.

@Janadu

18 күн бұрын

So, in other words if you're really good at covering your tracks you go free. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

@Valeria-mq3qn

18 күн бұрын

@@JanaduIt does make sense. If you can’t PROVE that someone committed a crime, then why should they be convicted of it?

@vit3869

18 күн бұрын

Yes, there was no direct evidence, but the Jury felt he was somehow involved or complacent. He himself admitted repeatedly to knowing more than he was letting.

The simple fact that a juror admitted that she doesn't know if he was even there....that should be grounds for a re-trial, given that the jurors clearly did not understand their job.

@theoryofpersonality1420

18 күн бұрын

No. You don't understand how the system works.

@itzflowers4me

18 күн бұрын

@@theoryofpersonality1420 Stop trolling.

@Junkinsally

17 күн бұрын

@@theoryofpersonality1420-😂😂😂

@MStarr-dp8fc

16 күн бұрын

@@theoryofpersonality1420agreed!!! The jurors ARE allowed to comment once the verdict is handed down. Hence WHY they are NOT allowed to discuss cases when they are on JURY DUTY. People need stop being so EXTRA, when they don’t know what’s going on. SMH

@Adrian-cw8yu

16 күн бұрын

Guilty! throw away the key

The jury: We’re not sure if he was there, but he definitely did it. They admit there is no physical evidence and still vote guilty. What a joke!!

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

They should be ashamed of themselves.

@mwahha6965

18 күн бұрын

Yes they’re just guessing

@MS-bs8dd

18 күн бұрын

Exactly!!!

@madrush24

18 күн бұрын

They can be. I mean, it's a crap shoot. You get 12 Americans. Imagine pulling 12 people randomly from the comments.

@LIGHT7CODE7

18 күн бұрын

American broken justice system for ya.

These juror's have no concept of what "beyond a reasonable doubt" means. This man should not have been convicted.

@MakeItMakeSense285

18 күн бұрын

The missing hard drive and the testimony his father gave is hard to overlook. He also blabbed to a bunch of people. Had financial motive.

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

100% agreed, especially because no forensics place him there. I don't know if he did it or not, but there is more than reasonable doubt.

@SidewaysInTraffic

18 күн бұрын

@@MakeItMakeSense285 Which leads me to believe he would have told on himself if he did it. This guy couldn't keep a secret if his life depended on it. Look how easily influenced he is that people made him feel guilty about having a drink & smoke with his wife's ashes where they first met.

@arbjful

18 күн бұрын

Yes I agree, 100%

@Justice-ef9sk

18 күн бұрын

@Bigpoppieseed--I agree with you 100%. There was never enough to convict Pelosi, yet they did it anyway. It was a high profile case and the MEDIA already convicted him -that’s why a jury did.

The fact that that lady just said “I’m not sure if he did it” but convicted him is crazy. They just assumed and thought he “fit” more than anyone else. Beyond a reasonable doubt is just a suggestion I’m guessing?

@theoryofpersonality1420

18 күн бұрын

It's not beyond all doubt. It's beyond a reasonable doubt. Reasonable in light of the days of evidence they had to sit through. They deemed it unreasonable and as a jury that's their job.

@SpydersByte

17 күн бұрын

@@theoryofpersonality1420 he didnt *say* beyond all doubt, he said beyond a reasonable doubt and there definitely seems to be a reasonable doubt amongst that jury, its kinda crazy that they convicted him and then admitted they really had no clue how it happened or whether he was even there just that he was probably involved in one way or another

@patriciamariemitchel

16 күн бұрын

The problem, along with the damning evidence his father presented about the question Danny asked him, was his friend's and his girlfriend's testimony. To say nothing of the fact that he said, his wife asked him to do it.

@GOOBENsticks

15 күн бұрын

​@@SpydersByte Being SURE someone did it is beyond ALL doubt. Saying they're NOT SURE, but still VERY LIKELY is beyond reasonable doubt. No one is ever SURE of a crime unless they were there and were the perpetrator.

@alexlogan202

15 күн бұрын

You are easily manipulated by media courtney

Beyond a reasonable doubt meant nothing to these jurors!

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

Unbelievable that some of those jurors weren't even sure about their decision to send him to jail for life. I think his appeal should've been granted.

@theoryofpersonality1420

18 күн бұрын

Shame on you

@Automedon2

18 күн бұрын

Read the comment section anywhere and those are the people who could potentially be on your jury

@fearwater5

18 күн бұрын

​@@theoryofpersonality1420 for having an opinion? The jurors acknowledged they weren't sure he did it.

@TheBrownIsland

18 күн бұрын

The Jury just did not like Danny.

Danny can prove he wasn't there and the jury still convicted him. How is that even possible?

@Justice-ef9sk

18 күн бұрын

Because Danny Pelosi was tried and convicted in the media. There was no way he would ever get a fair trial.

@trulyyoursish

17 күн бұрын

He could not prove. The witnesses were his sister and niece. The location of the phone doesn’t mean that he had to be where his phone was.

@Dlive2005

17 күн бұрын

Gov wanted the millions

17 күн бұрын

@@trulyyoursish It is the sole province of the jury to determine the credibility of witnesses.

@christianmayonove6914

16 күн бұрын

BuT tHe ReCoRdInGs - what a joke, someone could have found the recordings if they were looking for them.

jurors making a lot of assumptions when they're supposed to look at the evidence and if the evidence doesn't support the charge the defendant is not guilty. I would never want these people on a jury.

@_xBrokenxDreamsx_

18 күн бұрын

that's the problem with dna.. everyone expects forensic evidence nowadays but there are still circumstantial cases. who other than the accused had the motive, means and opportunity to commit this crime in the way it was committed?

@amyraszipovits810

18 күн бұрын

You are only hearing part of the evidence.

@jolo3118

18 күн бұрын

I think Allen is referring to the jurors own words at the end. He's not wrong. They convicted him on 2nd degree mdr when they had reasonable doubt that he had even held a weapon! Accessory is a completely different charge and he wasn't charged with that.

@theoryofpersonality1420

18 күн бұрын

You went there to hear days worth of evidence. You're watching a media production for entertainment. Not even close to the same thing.

@jolo3118

18 күн бұрын

@@theoryofpersonality1420 He's going off of what the jurors themselves said!

Husband and wife were completing their divorce with the wife getting $25M from it. Then it was alleged that Danny wanted the husband dead for fear of losing access to the husband's money. This makes no sense. How would Danny gain direct access to the husband's money whether the husband was dead or alive? Danny's access to the husband's money was through the wife and she was already getting $25M.

@angelamccrackin5243

18 күн бұрын

Greed....they wanted all of his money.

@jamiekensington1155

18 күн бұрын

That's exactly what I was wondering

@Bigwave2003

17 күн бұрын

If the husband died while they were still legally married, the wife might have a claim for more than the $25 million she would have received in the divorce.

@gaiagreen2690

16 күн бұрын

​@@angelamccrackin5243 They? There is NO evidence that Danny has anything to do with the crime.

@peaceoutvanlife

16 күн бұрын

😂🙄😢​@@gaiagreen2690

What if she knew she was dying before Ted was murdered? Everyone says the wife despise Ted. I think she had her husband killed knowing she would be dead before she faced prosecution.

@Nicole-zv7ee

7 күн бұрын

That's a good point!!

Unfair conviction. Jury swayed by emotion, not concrete evidence.

@stephaniek1076

18 күн бұрын

And, not the evidence on the stand.

@theoryofpersonality1420

18 күн бұрын

Yeah, because you were in that jury box. 🙄😒🤡🤪

@user-os1yg3zl6i

18 күн бұрын

So was the prosecutor

@Riley0509

18 күн бұрын

Of course he did it. No one else had a motive.

@TamiTribbiani-im1go

17 күн бұрын

​@@Riley0509They never even looked at anyone else

There is no proof at all that he was there. In fact there is proof that he was elsewhere. That is enough reasonable doubt and he should have never been convicted.

@mardiniwilldern

18 күн бұрын

Who took the tape out of somewhere nobody knows about then?!

@twatts1523

18 күн бұрын

@@mardiniwilldernyou don’t think Genovesa knew where the hard drive was?

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

I agree. There is not nearly enough proof. His appeal should've been granted.

@Vulcan-fo5gj

18 күн бұрын

There is as much proof that he wasn’t there as there is proof he was there. It’s a circumstantial case and could have gone either way

@harshanid3636

18 күн бұрын

Pelosi could of had someone take his phone and drive it to his sister's house for an alibi. I didn't believe his niece. Who is up a 3am?

The jurors are either incredibly stupid or robots. You really don't understand why a man could get angry when he sees his father calling him a murderer on the stand? I can't imagine a bigger betrayal.

@TOCC50

15 күн бұрын

MGTOW

"I saw him grit his teeth several times!" are these jurors actually stupid?? I would grit my teeth too if someone accused me of killing someone!

@mamalee354

12 күн бұрын

I agree with u😅

@Dulcimertunes

10 сағат бұрын

Who knew teeth gritting was a capital offense

@zoe6723

7 сағат бұрын

I grit my teeth while I'm sleeping

The only thing Danny is guilty of is talking a lot and looking like Tony Danza 😂

@minniemoo6640

18 күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂

@huskyventure1753

18 күн бұрын

I was thinking Sid the sloth character from Ice Age.

@dizzymindy6024

17 күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@elizabethmencia6027

17 күн бұрын

Tony Danza is much hotter

Great example of why the justice system is terrifying. The jurors even admit in their interviews that there was no evidence against Danny, but they convicted him for having knowledge of where the hard drive was. Generosa could have told ANYONE where it was! It's horrifying that someone could be put in prison for 25 years like this.

@maryseman7019

16 күн бұрын

What about the housekeeper? She'd have known.

@DeboraHolland-ei2yq

14 күн бұрын

Exactly. Appalling they could convict them sit there and say idk if he was there or not but he's responsible. There's no evidence!!

@jessicajimenez986

10 күн бұрын

​@@DeboraHolland-ei2yqExactly! And yet he was denied a new trial on appeal. That's New York's broken justice system for you.

I don't think Danny had anything to do with this, sad to see tunnel vision in these cases

@radicalreactions1633

18 күн бұрын

Or just your delusions.

@Unqualifiedtake

18 күн бұрын

Lack of physical evidence is odd.

@fearwater5

18 күн бұрын

Easier to blame the blue collar guy.

@stasa-X

18 күн бұрын

His same father said that he called him that night and asked him how to dismiss a body,i believe that he wasn't innocent at all, neither loved the woman, she never trusted her children , she preferred to give the protection of the children in nanny's hands.. He is a manipulator!!!

@rtru9801

18 күн бұрын

@@stasa-XWell you’re confused, he didn’t say a body, he said sone thing, and according to the prosecutors, he meant the hard - drive, did you listen to this, and the body wasn’t meant to be hidden

Truly. Of all the cases I have seen over the years - something is so off about this conviction. Someone free this man.

This is nonsense this man was convicted, jurors have to be held accountable for decisions they make in cases.they assumed alot of things.this case should have been a clear acquittal.his defense attorney was not gd enough

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

At the very least, his appeal should've been granted. It's shocking that even the jury didn't seem convinced of their decision!

@dragonmummy1

18 күн бұрын

What, you’re going to jail them if they get it wrong?

@zoe6723

6 сағат бұрын

He probably had a choice of jury or judge. Shoulda picked the judge. He understands the law.

Not completely sure why but I find the prosecutor so irritating.

@zephyrcalm9717

18 күн бұрын

over-caffeinated, she sounded. like playback speed of 2.

@Lambandpotatocurry

18 күн бұрын

Same

@GadeadelCid

18 күн бұрын

She was angry all the time for no reason.

@margaretwhittaker2291

18 күн бұрын

@@GadeadelCid I concur!

@cochip__5897

18 күн бұрын

Because she is irritating

His ex-wife could've gotten rid of the hard drive before she passed away. She said she'll do anything to protect him. When you have a lack of evidence, you can't convict a person.

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

Even the jury seemed unsure of their decision. His appeal should've been granted.

@marivipalomino6975

18 күн бұрын

To protect him because “he had nothing to don with it,” that’s what she said.

I'm not sure if he did it or not but he absolutely knows everybody who was involved.

Why these 2 remind me of Tony and Angela from who's the boss

@laurenconnolly8152

18 күн бұрын

Omg 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Right.

@Ladybhive71

17 күн бұрын

❤😂

@georgiesimmons5924

17 күн бұрын

Hahaa

@maxbedroom6234

17 күн бұрын

You nailed it! From Who's The Boss! Narrative from the sitcom somewhat similar to the real life situation of Danny and Generosa😅 Blue-collar falling in love with a white-collar. And the icing on the cake? Both had some Italian flavor😅

@towkarwyl9493

13 күн бұрын

Me too!!!

I hate to say it but she sounds like a nightmare. A control freak who gave instructions even after she was dead and even gave instructions as to how children should be raised and depriving them of their fathers family love

There is a ton of reasonable doubt!! Not guilty!!

@theoryofpersonality1420

18 күн бұрын

There's doubt but it wasn't reasonable in light of the days of evidence they heard.

@jimwerther

12 күн бұрын

This show didn't bring all the evidence

This is insane. Everyone is guessing, there is so much doubt that there isn't even a theory of what he did.

I think she hired someone to do it. But he knows what happeded. I think they both were watching the cameras while it was happening

@daphnesolomon8582

17 күн бұрын

Why then won't he reveal the truth and the hard drive location to save himself at least at the last minute when he took the stand!?

My theory goes as follows. I am convinced he didn’t do it, but he knew all about the details because he was made aware of everything that happened after it took place. She probably took the hard drive and asked him to dispose of it or he just wanted to do it to cover it up. He then asked his dad that question about getting rid of something. He sits in jail rotting, because he played with fire and got burned.

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

I agree with most of what you said. I don't think he should be in prison for life though, if all he did was not tell the police what he knew and throw away that hard drive.

@thelittleredhairedgirlfrom6527

18 күн бұрын

Agreed. I could see him being some kind of virtual lookout for Generosa and her accomplices, using the cameras to make sure that the coast is clear, but there’s nothing tying him to the house

@babettelenz7995

18 күн бұрын

Unfortunately, if he had anything to do with it at all, even just the hard drive, he is an accomplice. I think he knows exactly who did it. He probably doesn't want to speak ill of the dead.

@marivipalomino6975

18 күн бұрын

He is sitting in jail because the jurors were not fit for the job.

@daphnesolomon8582

17 күн бұрын

Apparently he's known to talk too much and went as far as saying Generosa must've killed Ted with the help of 2 others, but if he was really innocent, why wouldn't he save himself by revealing where the hard drive was, and mentioning all the other details he knows? And he claims that she married him just to keep him quiet. Isn't he now free to reveal all these details if he really is innocent!?That's what I don't get.

This one bothers me. He did not have a fair trial. Whatsoever guilty by association. Even the jurors said they have no idea if he murdered him or not, but they just think he had something to do with it wild. The wife wanted him murdered she clearly hated the man by all accounts. She knew about the camera system as well. Just because he was the boyfriend he's guilty? Kinda crazy that you can be convicted with no evidence. Even the precieved Circumstantial evidence was bogus. Thus feels like he was guilty when he walked into court and it was on him to prove his innocence. Thoughts?

@itzflowers4me

18 күн бұрын

Yep. I believe the wife hired people and had Danny remove the hard drive. Definitely not enough evidence to convict imo.

@helenmcdonnell2585

17 күн бұрын

Totally, this isn't justice. By this criteria, anyone associated with someone killed is automatically a suspect, the implications for average Joe in the USA is you could all potentially find yourselves in Danny's position. Scary

The juror isn't sure if he was there or not and doesn't know what role he could have played but still found him guilty 🙄🙄

Those jurors should be ashamed of themselves. They've done a terrible thing.

@Whatintheworld2020

11 күн бұрын

I agree 100%

Damn it, me and my addiction. I saw this episode like twice 😂

@AidaShawJ.D.

18 күн бұрын

😂😂 you won the cutest comment on the net! May the victim rest in peace!

@drewbranch7700

18 күн бұрын

I remember this case,and I understand. Curious,which crime documentaries do you watch or listen to,I need some recommendations.

@UCONN_HUSKIES

18 күн бұрын

​@drewbranch7700 investigation discovered. The first 48. Crime watch daily.

@UCONN_HUSKIES

18 күн бұрын

​@drewbranch7700 I tried to give you recommendations but youtube just deleted it.

@Sigyn_Shay

18 күн бұрын

⁠@@drewbranch7700if you’re interested in police footage, interrogations, and a break down of the mental health behind the person committing the crimes, there’s a KZread channel called “Beyond Evil” and it’s got all of those things! It’s really good. I do want to note that their episodes are a bit more intense than 48 hours. It can get pretty gritty, with the 911 calls. But they do usually include trigger warnings on each episode about material they’re going over. Happy trails! Ohhhh edited to include another channel! It’s called “EXPLORE WITH US”. (In all caps) It’s another true crime gem!

Danny talked himself right into a prison sentence

@tamielizabethallaway2413

16 күн бұрын

No he didn't! It doesn't matter what he says anyway, and he doesn't decide his sentence. He could be the loudest vile tempered man on earth if he wanted to be, the jury are supposed to go on the EVIDENCE...and the EVIDENCE proved him to be elsewhere at the time! They even admitted they reasonable doubts! Therefore they are supposed to declare not guilty. Instead they went with their emotions. He should have never been convicted.

@elishevarosenfeld6755

11 күн бұрын

Where is the proof

How bizarre one juror still isn't sure Danny is guilty. How did they manage a conviction?!

@itzflowers4me

18 күн бұрын

Must've been peer pressure.

@gg79139

16 күн бұрын

I’ll tell you what, if I EVER am called to a jury there’s NO WAY I will be bullied or made to feel less if I choose a verdict that conflicts with the majority. This man should not be incarcerated. This b makes me heartsick.

@GetItInGood

15 күн бұрын

@@gg79139 wow you're so great, here's a pat on the back.

If she was dying, she should have at least confessed on her death bed.

This is scary how he was convicted. There was zero evidence putting him there but the jurors literally said “well who else could it be” - you can’t convict someone with that line of thinking. There is insane doubt. They convicted him bc they felt he “knew about it at some point.” Unreal.

Danny’s tone and voice on all those recordings is drastically different than his interview with the host. I wasn’t there, I don’t know them - I can’t say if he was a murderer or not, but he’s 100% a con artist.

@jdstep97

6 күн бұрын

I agree with you. I think Danny is not to be trusted. I'd never be alone with the man if I had something I thought he wanted.

Sat on a Jury and believe me, some of the most intelligent stupid people i was sat with. They go on their feelings, rather than fact and evidence.

@doodlebob2023

18 күн бұрын

mustve been women eh?

@smontone

18 күн бұрын

@@doodlebob2023 actually they were old white men 😂

@LinDuhLou

18 күн бұрын

Sounds a lot like the Trump jurors.

@LinDuhLou

18 күн бұрын

@@doodlebob2023or Rainbow “men”…

@maxbedroom6234

17 күн бұрын

​@@LinDuhLou🌈 rainbow group that begins with letter...L😂

Hot Take: Danny’s ex-wife was gonna use him as a patsy and the cancer was a curveball she wasn’t ready for.

@fluteloop6737

18 күн бұрын

Hotter take: Generosa faked her own death and is living on Epstein's Island. Danny brought his dog's ashes to the bar and crossdresses in jail

That crime scene has tons of DNA evidence not just the victim but the perpetrator as well...but obviously they did not DIG enough...Poor detective work ..Beyond reasonable doubt..

@user-vj6og9xe7q

18 күн бұрын

Suffolk PD is beyond corrupt

If much of their decision relied on the surveillance tape being removed... the ex-wife also knew where it was and could have told someone to remove it. Flimsy case.

The prosecution's greatest feat is getting 12 jurors selected who would convict with such weak evidence.

@Jamietheroadrunner

14 күн бұрын

I assume the jury was mostly wealthy since it’s The Hamptons. Many wealthy types still think that us lower classes are all emotional sociopaths, just like they used to in the old days.

I love vintage 48 Hours episodes. The writing, editing, photos, and the hosts all create such intriguing stories! Please upload more older episodes from the 90s and 2000s that are not available to watch on Pluto TV!! I’ve pretty much watched all of the older episodes on Pluto and have noticed there are hundreds of other episodes missing

Who else would know more and have the motive than Danny.... Generosa.

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

Yep.

@PianoGesang

17 күн бұрын

Then why didn't she exonerate him once and for all before she died by confessing to the crime in her last wish, sharing some inside knowledge to prove it?

@thesselmatthew-watkins1233

17 күн бұрын

🤝🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽🤝🏽

@sherriianiro747

15 күн бұрын

​@@PianoGesangBecause she knew more people were involved and endanger him.

@atthebijou8209

3 күн бұрын

@@PianoGesang because that would reflect on her children.

Wait, so the jurors admit there's no evidence, yet still convicted him?

These jurors made a decision with a lot of unknowns. That makes them idiots in my opinion. Listening to them was so annoying.

@RullXov

18 күн бұрын

Not as annoying as listening to Danny..😅

@Mathsandengineering

18 күн бұрын

Stealing the hard drive was something only the killer who installed it would do

@rtru9801

18 күн бұрын

@@MathsandengineeringPlease elaborate on that

@doodlebob2023

18 күн бұрын

@@Mathsandengineering elaborate. we are waiting.

@hay_u

18 күн бұрын

@@Mathsandengineering eh, That’s not true. Anyone who committed the crime can see there’s cameras there and would look for the hard drive. Also who’s to say generosa didn’t have that info and passed it along to a hired killer.

I hate when jurors try and call out someone's "rage" or "snappy" moments as if that makes them guilty. We are all human at the end of the day... A lot of emotions running and then to have your DAD get on the stand against you ? Tell me how you would have felt. You know how angry you get when someone try's to tell you that you did something and you know for sure you haven't done anything...

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

Totally.

Generosa groomed him to do her dirty work. Made him believe she is in love with him, fed him with hate to her ex and fear of loosing money and lavish lifestyle. He killed ( or hired someone) her ex, hid recording. She married him so they could refuse to testify agains each other. When she find out she is dying, she left him as it was no need to stay with him anymore. That's why she didn't want kids to grow up with him. She passed away and left him to pay for everything....Very simple case ...

@pajamamama5965

18 күн бұрын

Exactly 💯

@jimwerther

12 күн бұрын

Except when she was offered immunity to turn on him after she had been diagnosed, she flat out turned them down.

My God. You mean to tell me the jurors couldn't see the unbelievable complete naivetivity in this man??. Stupid jurors and that woman prosecutor is the idiot of them all.

@RyanJennHendrickson

18 күн бұрын

She said defendants are presumed innocent, not intelligent. I was thinking "pot calling the kettle black..."

@theoryofpersonality1420

18 күн бұрын

Shame on you

The jurors are confused themselves about their own decision to convict Daniel? WTF!!!

@laprimo21

17 күн бұрын

Yes this is not reassuring.

I've never seen this one before. So glad 48 Hours posted today, I really needed a distraction from my crappy life right now. Super sick family of 10......thank you 48 Hours 💯

@user-ti3sk1kz5e

18 күн бұрын

May God be with you

@jamekahall549

18 күн бұрын

Praying healing for your family 🙏

@gcrichman53

18 күн бұрын

Do you mean they are mentally or physically sick and if so with what?

@keishamay904

18 күн бұрын

I'm praying for you all for speedy recovery ❤

@ChrisPlaysDG

18 күн бұрын

I'd be sick too if my mom put my whole life on KZread 🤡

It is absolutely ridiculous his conviction!!! There was absolutely NO evidence he was there!!

Don’t get why the ex wife was so mad- she got $25 million- that would be enough to assuage any anger I had.

@trinleywangmo

18 күн бұрын

Right? She wanted one per year... that's 25 years! She could have used half to invest and lived luxuriously for the rest of her life!

@stfuplsok

18 күн бұрын

Greed got her into her grave.

@Bigwave2003

17 күн бұрын

Ted Ammon was worth $97 million. Maybe the wife felt entitled to more than $25 million.

@joemorgan636

9 күн бұрын

Oh, I hundred percent agree, that’s more than more than enough for the rest of our life why didn’t she just let it all go they call it pride didn’t they just pride and a little bit greed so sad and the thing is I don’t think Danny done it

His father waited a year and all of a sudden he asked you how to get rid of something. He was probably mad Danny won’t giving him some money or something smh I don’t see how you convict with no real evidence. This is really messed up.

I don't know man. Danny seems innocent to me. His personality is endearing. But, who knows. I dont know him or any of them.

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

There certainly was not enough evidence to put him behind bars.

@cynthiakritika5047

18 күн бұрын

He hired the gunman is my guess.

@margaretwhittaker2291

18 күн бұрын

@@cynthiakritika5047 there was no gun, was there? I thought he was beaten to death [ over the head ? ]

@lifeexperienceandgrowthyoutube

17 күн бұрын

He and Generosa may have hired the murderer.

I don’t think he did it sorry I think the investigator are Lazy and don’t want to do their job and there’s more to the story

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

And the fact that his appeal was denied tells me that there's something at play higher up. I think they just wanted to throw him behind bars because blue-collars shouldn't mess with rich people.

I thought it would be hung jury. Sitting here, listening to this show, I would not put him jail.

Release him asap…this guy is innocent…the only guilty ones are those jurors, who assumed too much

@PC4ever

17 күн бұрын

What? He admitted that he was involved on the stand.

@BikeonMyBs

16 күн бұрын

@@PC4everhe all, but admitted in this short doc that he knew the wife did it.

For the first time i don't think the convicted is the killer

@Mathsandengineering

18 күн бұрын

He did it lol. The hard drive proves it

@twatts1523

18 күн бұрын

@@Mathsandengineering How does the hard drive prove it? I thought is was missing.

@rtru9801

18 күн бұрын

@@twatts1523Welll people on here sone how think that since it’s missing he took it and that makes him the murderer, they are lacking logically thinking skills

I don't think he killed him

@drewpro81

18 күн бұрын

I think you mean *him

@sunnyday1868

18 күн бұрын

@@drewpro81 oh yeah... tnx for that

@doodlebob2023

18 күн бұрын

i think u did it.

@sunnyday1868

18 күн бұрын

@@doodlebob2023 yeah

There are two really toxic women in this story: Prosecutor Albertson & Generosa. Imagine leaving your kids with a Nanny they don't even like & not their family because you are upset with their family? I think she really wanted her ex-husband to move to the English countryside because she was jealous of him actually having a family (she was an orphan) and tried to isolate him. When he couldn't do that, she started to resent him. She had a lot of bitterness in her soul and it really affected the quality of her childrens' lives. Now that prosecutor Albertson- She judged Danny from the moment she laid eyes on him. She probably felt like he never deserved love from a "high-class" woman or even deserved any decent quality of life because of his background. Something about Danny triggered some personal emotions within the Prosecutor. Maybe she dated a guy like that before and he broke her heart. Idk, but her unfounded disdain for him is strange & unjustified. How can they convict poor Danny with such little evidence. This story makes me so sad.

@Southamericangirl42

17 күн бұрын

I totally agree with you on Missy Prosecutor's disdain for Danny.

@user-ie1vf5sv3j

17 күн бұрын

Absolutely!

@user-ov6bv9cn1o

14 күн бұрын

I know this story from back in the day. Generosa sounded like an awful woman. The prosecutors Long Island accent is irritating.

@teekolinski491

10 күн бұрын

@@user-ov6bv9cn1o as a Long Island native- i will always love classic LI, NYC, and Jersey accents.

@user-ov6bv9cn1o

10 күн бұрын

@@teekolinski491 I grew up near nyc too but the Long Island accent is obnoxious. In my opinion.

I cant believe the jury found him guilty and based it all on the thought that he took the hard drive. This was total circumstantial. Crazy

The jurors put him in jail without any evidence. 😮

@TamiTribbiani-im1go

17 күн бұрын

Happens too often, and guilty people go free,

@l.a.3479

16 күн бұрын

Not true. There was circumstantial evidence.

@TamiTribbiani-im1go

16 күн бұрын

@l.a.3479 Not enough, if there was jurors would have been more sure of their verdict.

The jury got it wrong in my opinion. It’s scary that a lot of people go to jail because things “fit” and someone had pay for the crime. With no evidence at all and yet you send him to jail! The judge should’ve overturned the vote

If you read the investigation conducted by Vanity Fair about this case, you would never feel sorry for this man. He and Generosa deserved to spend their entire lives in jail. It's horrible that she never paid for her crime.

To clear his name, why didn't he make a copy of the hard drive for evidence, in case things went wrong? Now he’s left holding the bag.

@pajamamama5965

18 күн бұрын

Yeah he didn't have to get rid of it. he could have kept it for proof he wasn't involved. Bottom line is the jurors did not believe his testimony.

@atthebijou8209

3 күн бұрын

maybe someone took the hard drive before he could copy it?

Been listening to reruns all morning, glad y’all dropped one I haven’t seen!

@joemorgan636

9 күн бұрын

I don’t think Danny done it No No Way

@joemorgan636

9 күн бұрын

Only thing he chats too much

Old episodes absolutely golden. The setup was phenomenal. Richard schlessinger delivers a cold and powerful rendition of this episode it is just absolutely fantastic 48 hours, been watching literally my entire life.

I love when you show the ones that are from 90s and early 2000s! Love waking up to a notification for a 48 hours drop! Coffee and crime time! 😊

They found him guilty because they didn't like him. Totally forgetting that the wife knew where the harddrive was at. Wow!! Totally dumb. Listen to them. I hope they never slept well after this.

@Southamericangirl42

17 күн бұрын

You're so right. They looked down on him because he's a high school drop-out. It began with that uptight prosecutor.

Imagine your own father ratting you out that’s treacherous

@tamielizabethallaway2413

16 күн бұрын

Yeah...but he's just supposed to smile and whisper "love you Papa!" according to the jury....🙄

Shocking jury. They wanted to convict him regardless of doubt.

@helenmcdonnell2585

17 күн бұрын

Yeah, they just didn't like him

In my opinion imagine being spied on for 6 months in your own home and then dying in that terrifying horrible way.. My opinion = Bitter, angry, detestable wife, new boyfriend who was flattered that she would even look at him, he was probably putty in her ladyships hands and would do anything to live up to her honourable standards so I think she was at the root of it all, Poor Ted what a horrible way to go... rip Ted xx

I think the dead, rich ex-wife had it done and left the blue collar average Joe holding the bag. 🤷🏼‍♀️

It's disturbing to me that the jurors, at least some of them, after the trial are sitting there giving their own theories as to what happened to the murdered victim in this case and their own theories do not have evidence presented in the trial to support them. It's like they voted guilty because it seemed like he could have done it, not because the evidence the State presented to them proved he did it. So this is just ridiculous. I don't know if this Pelosi dude is guilty or not but from what I learned here, I couldn't have voted guilty if the case had to be deemed a mistrial.

Richard Schlesinger is the best of the best!

I think Pelosi's mouth and arrogance played a huge part in his conviction.

Generosa, unlike her name suggests, was not generous. She used Danny so he would be framed. He should not have been convicted.

I don’t think that he did what they say the evidence says that he couldn’t have done it, and generosa could have told someone that she paid where that hard drive was, this needs to be retried Danny was just a fallguy

Danny doesn’t seem like he would’ve carried it out by himself, honestly what he says about his ex wife and two other people make sense, he is also the perfect fall guy for anyone higher powered to set up. The jury don’t know what happened, they admit they all think there’s more than one person involved… crazy to convict on that 😮

Absolutely no physical evidence of any kind. This was a miscarriage of justice. He may be an idiot, but he's not a murderer. Our justice system is completely broken.

I don't remember fashion from 2001 looking like 1986

@doodlebob2023

18 күн бұрын

9/11 changed everything bro

@iloveashleysade

18 күн бұрын

😂

@monicarenee7949

18 күн бұрын

I do, that’s close enough to the late 80s/early 90s where fashion kinda stayed stagnant for a while. I remember early 2000s was when I really noticed a change in fashion but it was more so youth clothing that changed

@joemars41

18 күн бұрын

That is so unimportant

@PianoGesang

17 күн бұрын

@@joemars41 Important enough for you to react with a comment.

What the hell, did the jury forget reasonable doubt? this is insane!

the jurors are clowns, they all have doubts but they still convict him? How is that even called guilty beyond reasonable doubt

The jurors failed their duty in this case.

@jenna-a-gogo

18 күн бұрын

They should be ashamed of themselves.

One lesson to be learned here is not all that glitter is gold. The woman saw Danny as the perfect opportunity

They convicted him with a PILE OF REASONABLE DOUBT, even though the rule says it should be WITHOUT A REASONABLE DOUBT. Think about that for a second. Our legal system is a joke

This is why I keep my nose clean and stay out the way. There is absolutely no evidence to convict this man, but somehow, the jurors locked him up

@luvbeinghiswife1148

15 күн бұрын

Same. I know how much those people hate people like us. I stay in my lane. They're always looking for a reason.

Rise and shine! It's time to conquer the world with your brilliance. Believe in yourself and make this day count🌞❤😊

@Empresslore

18 күн бұрын

Thank you!

@davidc3839

18 күн бұрын

I hate affirmations.

@khismet

18 күн бұрын

@@davidc3839 Oh, too bad.. there's an affirmation for that. Would you like to see it😀🐝

@khismet

18 күн бұрын

@@Empresslore 🌼🙌🌼

@audreyhuggins8822

18 күн бұрын

Wow! Thank you! I will make this day count!

There's no way he shouldnt be able to get this appeal over turned.

I don't think he did it

@doodlebob2023

18 күн бұрын

we should sleep together

How in the world does someone get convict of a crime without any evidence??! How stupid are those jurors!!!

There definitely should have been a retrial. The jury didn't comprehend the task. BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. One juror said she didn't know if he was there!! Our courts are broken!

How was this beyond a reasonable doubt? 😮😐🤨🤐😬

I'm not sure if he did it or not, but from what I saw on this show -- there definitely was not enough evidence (or any, for that matter) to know that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

What about reasonable doubt?

Generosa took him out and died with that secret...