Looks great., You know truth is I wouldn't mind owning a couple of these for personal use.

@WorksOnMyComputer

15 күн бұрын

You would always get a parking space.

What an incredible Fighting Vehicle !

Austin Powers Boxer, Yeah Baby Yeah.

They also showed one variant at the Eurosatory 2022 with tracks and a 120mm autoloader cannon. It's named RCT120 but at the moment there are not many information about it.

@steveyoutub76

Жыл бұрын

the stryker has problems with the recoil from the 105 mm gun, hmm.

@liljon0111

7 ай бұрын

@@steveyoutub76 That's partly because it's wheeled, this boxer is modified to have tracksas such it would be a more stable platform

@bertnl530

7 ай бұрын

@@steveyoutub76 The Stryker is a complete different vehicle. The Boxer is 2 times heavier then Stryker.

@LeonAust

7 ай бұрын

Boxer tracks? are you sure?@@liljon0111

Brilliant

It must be amazing if Australia chose it.

@PhilipWhitehouse-om7tx

6 ай бұрын

It has.

Danke für das Video und die Information. Es war ein Genuss

@spotlight9864

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching)

@andreaswulff1912

Жыл бұрын

@@spotlight9864 com from my heart

When I first heard about the Boxer decades ago, I was very skeptical about the modularity concept. I thought it is mostly a useless gimmick because no army would ever swap such modules out to turn for example a command post vehicle into a ambulance or something like that. I was right about that, but I missed the point. The point is not to turn military vehicles into transformers that would switch roles on the battlefield. The point was that now Rheinmetall/KMW can offer any kind of military vehicle to any customer and have it all based on one common platform that comes off one assembly line. That is absolute genius and I didn't realize that in the beginning. Now, no matter what country/army needs a new verhicle, the Boxer can compete. It can be the answer to any problem any military force has, especially now that they also developed a tracked transport module. You need a APC? Boxer got you covered. You need a short range air defense system (SHORAD)? Just get a Boxer with the SHORAD module. You need a field radar system? Just slap one on to a Boxer. And on top of that now there are also third party companies that are developing and offering their own Boxer mission modules. Apparently there are already 3 or 4 modules with different 120mm mortar systems by different manufacturers being offered, so the Boxer is becoming its own military industry eco system that can be used as a middle man between smaller manufacturers who maybe can't develop their own full vehicle but can develop a mission module and the customer looking for a new vehicle. The whole concept is so ingenious that in a world where military contracts are always given to the best option and where neither corruption nor national interests (wanting to support homegrown companies) were a factor, Boxer would have to win basically every tender and get all the contracts in the next 30 years or so. And even with all those other factors determining who gets a contract, Boxer still has a leg up because they can not only offer to produce the thing in the customer's home country, but they can even offer that some company in that country can develop and provide their own mission modules to the project.

@gOtze1337

5 ай бұрын

The Modular System is the only way it can be Airlifted by the A400M.

@TheRst2001

7 күн бұрын

Yeh all good points . With battle damage , if one vehicle had track damage and another vehicle turret damage you could quickly get one vehicle up and running . I am really interested to see how the tracked chassis comes along . That could open up whole new avenues of modularity . In ukraine where tracked vehicles only good in winter muddy times, I was thinking its possible to order 500 modules and then have 500 chassis each of wheeled and tracked allowing one to use the 500 modules 12 months of the year mud rain or shine . I think its a great system. Would like to see a similar design but for much less tonnage vehicles

Yes great Video with a lot of informations :)

@spotlight9864

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching)

Amazing that Germany is now buying 123 Australian Boxer, because they can't produce enough on their own!

@bigpoop112

Жыл бұрын

It’s because Rheinmetall focused on export because for the past years Germany wasn’t really interested in buying weapons. Doesn’t mean we can’t produce them, but just not yet

@steveyoutub76

Жыл бұрын

of course they could produce enough in germany if they wanted to

@wudruffwildcard252

Жыл бұрын

@@steveyoutub76 It takes Rheinmetall almost more than six months to set up a production line for munitions. How long do you think does it take them to set up a new production line for Boxers? Sure Germany could wait but their number 1 priority right now is speed.

@CjqNslXUcM

Жыл бұрын

@@wudruffwildcard252 The Australians probably didn't overcharge them, considering they are not in a hurry, since they don't share a continent with russia.

@d.o.g573

11 ай бұрын

Maybe they are busy with „something else“ 😉

Definitely my next shopping trolley.

I think this is my favorite vehicle now.

All these kinds of videos about vehicles are always about the weapons, etc. But I hardly see any videos where it is very important with a vehicle. The driver and his place...

Amazing 🤩

Idk why do they seem to function better than tracked tanks on off-road performance.

Meantime there is a version by KMW which is a normal modular boxer on tracks.

Philippines Armed Force should get this instead of the guarani

I read the UK is to get 500plus of various versions of the Boxer. I also read that they and the Swedes were going to see if a Mjolnar (spelling?) turret with 120mm mortar can be made to fit. The 155mm version looks unwieldy surely that hull would be better suited to a 105mm (similar to the Abbot) fitment. As for Ajax - I understand there is one unit now issued with it and have experience no further problems -though after spending what they have on it they would say that wouldn't they?

This is a recurring issue with regards to various armed forces and new kit, they all say that there new kit is the best in the world but they always forget that by the time it’s been fully integrated into service it’s already outdated

Australia does not use the Boxer in any APC role, it is used as an Armoured Recon vehicle, while 1st armoured, 2 Cav and 2/14th all have a dismounted element, this is not their primary role

Great Britain is replacing their Warriors infantry combat vehicles with the infantry combat version of the Boxer. Ironically, they are replacing their current tracked reconnaissance vehicle with a tracked vehicle, Ajax.

2:05

Boxer Saracen Scorpion Scimitar for the protection of Britain. Challengers Chieftains These platform would help protect Britain

@Only1199

5 ай бұрын

No chance all those minus the boxer have been retired due to better platforms and technology being available, even the challenger 2 is being upgraded to mark 3 status. the boxer will serve alongside the Ajax series as the backbone of British Armour for decades.

@Scaleyback317

Ай бұрын

The Saracen was almost a concept before its time and should have been developed and re-designed with each evolution. It never fulfilled its potential because nobody had the vision to do so. Much of the rest of what you list has been considered obsolete. The world has moved on.

@frankthompson6503

Ай бұрын

@@Scaleyback317 obsolete but fast and manoverable upgrade for Britain Put missles and chain gun's on each platform. Heavier armour these platforms are better than light skinned land Rover range Rover

Ukraine 🇺🇦 need these BOXERS!

The Boxer has a small exhaust port leading directly to the engine's core. Let's hope the rebels won't find out about it.

Really incredible but im still saying that the swiss piranha V and IV are better in pretty much every way

What do I think? AS21 Redback, hands down better!

@PhilipWhitehouse-om7tx

6 ай бұрын

Has a different role, for a start the REDBACK has tracks,not wheels and will be employed in the Australian Army primarily in the APC role. Perhaps you are confusing BOXER with LYNX ?

@donaldmatthews7226

6 ай бұрын

Nope, same role, Australia just chose different vehicles for each role. Both can perform both roles, recon and ifv, can they not?

@jonny2954

15 сағат бұрын

@@donaldmatthews7226 A Boxer has a range in excess of 1000 km with one fuel load. No tracked vehicle comes even remotely close to that, so no. Boxer is certainly the better recce vehicle, also a lot quieter.

Is it a Chocolate Box on wheels the only combat it's seen is in Afghanistan not exactly a peer2peer adversary

Still destroy by nuclear

Will the Boxer burn 🔥 in Ukraine?

@TrangleC

5 ай бұрын

You poor Russians. I really feel sorry for you. For many decades the only thing you could be proud of was your military and your weapons and now the whole world learned that your military and your weapons are garbage too and what you thought you knew about them was just propaganda lies. That must really hurt and I understand why you guys go around to write comments like that on KZread and other sites. It is a pity because Russians had potential. There are many good Russian mathematicians, programmers and chess players and the such, but their potential was wasted because their country was taken over and run by a bunch of mafia goons. A empire run by the kind of people who maybe would run a brothel and a strip club in any other country. That is why there is no Russian IBM, no Russian Microsoft, no Russian Apple, or anything really. All those Russian programmers are doing is writing viruses and scamming people on the internet. No wonder your enemies call you "Orcs". It really seems as if you can not build and create anything, just destroy things and fuck with things other people created. I wish I would see any hope for Russia after the Putin regime is gone, but unfortunately what little hope for a better future there was left has all been sold to China now.

They are buying the australian block 2 version. Which is a major improvement over the standard model