"İ'm not the best but İ've fought the bests." So humble.

@syntax_error6882

4 жыл бұрын

and he say that from is heart ..

@blackjack-ks8zn

3 жыл бұрын

He is one of the best in my book

@rozivansantiagosantiago9727

3 жыл бұрын

Xvfio

@RazorEdge2006

3 жыл бұрын

Foreman may not have been the very best, but he was at least the second best (after Muhammad Ali).

@seyab6567

3 жыл бұрын

@@RazorEdge2006 agree

the 70^s and 90's were golden ages in the heavyweight division, Foreman played a role in both eras.

@leovila6012

3 жыл бұрын

Thy

@LUKERs1196

3 жыл бұрын

More impressively he was champion in both eras despite a ten year layoff

@pietromasia1570

3 жыл бұрын

@@leovila6012 che si terrà

@user-qh8js4vc3i

3 жыл бұрын

Hk .,

@hamidbouiche2888

3 жыл бұрын

@@leovila6012 opqpiqeoqq%

This fight would've been the equivalent of King Kong Vs Godzilla had it happened.

@hunitbanz4071

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao dope reference

@dimebagdarrell2390

3 жыл бұрын

King Kong vs Godzilla is a awesome movie

@whoisme99

3 жыл бұрын

Na

@whoisme99

3 жыл бұрын

Foreman is real beast

@hunitbanz4071

3 жыл бұрын

@@whoisme99 nah

Foreman hit Frazier with an upper cut that lifted him off his feet.Evander Holyfield said George hit him the hardest. Tyson hit Berbick once and he stumbled thrice in trying to get up.The scared look on Michael Spinks's face as Mike approached the ring was something else. This would've been one of the greatest fights of all time.two devastating punchers going at each other until one falls

@robertstdon9280

4 жыл бұрын

Sunny Rathod it all ready happened. if you watch Foreman vs Ron lyle .to hard punchers both went down twice before round 5

@SSR175

4 жыл бұрын

@@robertstdon9280 Yup, that was one hell of a slugfest and one of the most entertaining fights ever. But Tyson was more methodical and his peek a boo style would have given Prime Foreman some problems. On the other hand, Mike probably never faced anyone as powerful as George who'd throw him around and still manage to land bombs like we saw in the first Frazier fight. It'd have been an epic fight

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

@@SSR175 stop trolling sayin dumb quotes cause george wouldnt be doing that to tyson

@SSR175

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman we all know what Holyfield did to Tyson. So, you better believe what he has to say about Foreman. I love Mike Tyson but it'd be anything but easy for him against George Foreman.

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

@@SSR175 hmm well that wasnt the best Tyson so dont mean much young holy gets beat by Tyson and i know tyson would beat george his def he had none easy to see and dwight showed george would lose

George Forman's humble attitude makes him great of greats....❤❤❤

"It's suicide against Foreman if you're short and fight a swarming attacking style like Marciano or Frazier," - Cus D’Amato

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

never said that dumb follower

@leenvdsteeg8147

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman never said that dumb follower

@ant8041

2 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman he did.

@ant8041

2 жыл бұрын

Tyson style is very similar to Fraziers.

@cmoneytheman

2 жыл бұрын

@@ant8041 he did.

Young "prime" Mike Tyson KO'd Steve Zouski in 3 rounds. Coming out of 10 years retirement, overweight and rusty George Foreman destroyed same Steve Zouski a year later in 4 rounds. Makes you wonder...

@imadeyoureadthis1500

4 жыл бұрын

that dude versed some hard punchers mike tyson, george foreman, tommy morrison, corie sanders and theres some more but i dont know if they hit very very hard

@rozaklampung6056

4 жыл бұрын

Nuang

@leonchisora4268

4 жыл бұрын

George sayed in an interview he was scared to fight Mike, he was told by Alì that tyson was a Crazy man

@fiucik1

4 жыл бұрын

@@leonchisora4268 Yea, that was old George saying that, because George is the most modest and humle man in the world. But back then, he called out Tyson on numerous occasions. For example after knocking out Cooney in 2 rounds, he said that he would have made quicker job on Tyson, since Mike wouldn't run from him.

@leonchisora4268

4 жыл бұрын

@@fiucik1 exactly because he Is old he Is saying the Truth, those are his words, George he Is humble for sure but he Is honest also, when fighters are young and active they talk for the TV and media, anyway i'm not saying tyson would destroy Foreman, i'm just saying that would be a great fight, your maths doesn't mean shit in boxing, the thing mike 3 rounds and old George 4 Is a stupid thing to Say because MMA and boxing maths are bullshit, they are two Legends but we Will never know Who would have won

Boxing Extra the best hands down 💯🔥

@suherman1677

4 жыл бұрын

Ayam aduan.,

@alexandrerodriguescarvalho9442

4 жыл бұрын

Gostaria de assistir uma luta entre Tyson e cassius klay, Tyson não teria chance.

@user-di1rt3tl6u

Жыл бұрын

@@alexandrerodriguescarvalho9442 واسمه محمد علي كلاي رحمه الله

Evander Holyfield said that Foreman was the hardest puncher he had ever faced and he faced old Foreman as well as Mike Tyson twice. So I guess that settles it. With Foreman's significant height advantage, it is hard to see how Tyson could have come out on top.

@cmoneytheman

4 жыл бұрын

stop sayin followers quotes its crap

@johnyboy19685

4 жыл бұрын

Because George wouldnt be able to hit him

@cmoneytheman

4 жыл бұрын

@@johnyboy19685 if u being sarcastic stop it if u serious I feel the same

@johnyboy19685

4 жыл бұрын

cmoneytheman no I’m being honest I love Tyson but George is one big hard man you never know what would have happened

@cmoneytheman

4 жыл бұрын

@@johnyboy19685 from seeing it's easy to see to me George couldnt hit Tyson much I dont know why people so blind they will say how george could beat him maybe they mean Tyson just stands there no defense no other way George could hit him much he didnt punch at a normal speed its common sense

People compare Tyson to Frazier, but really they had nothing in common except the fact they were both under 6ft. Very different fighters altogether, especially defensively

@ascendediam

Жыл бұрын

Well only crazy followers who dont watch either say they fought alike this is nothing alike joe fought in a straight line moved head to much and up and down threw jabs and straight hooks did 2 punch combos Tyson fought in a straight line bkut once close punched from angles moved head around not just simple like joe didnt throw much jabs threw wide hooks jumped into punches when he was a distance from the person mike did this tyson would dodge while doin combos joe didnt do that ether did 4 or 5 punch combos mike did this joe fought from close range mike was mid range mike was a counter puncher joe wasnt a counter puncher he was a ducking and then punch take 1 and give one Not similar at all

@ascendediam

Жыл бұрын

the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed george height is advantage pushes means he dominates his power was to much uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast swammers lose fast dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds george said for dwight he said he had trouble hittin him even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage they say works for george dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick dwight style like joe but better defense ali and jim fast punchers and defense frank real slow and almost as George smith slow and strong Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd

Would’ve loved to see this one!

@aladinsantos2033

3 жыл бұрын

@Tair Tairi óoóioóoóooó

The best way to envision the two fighters; Tyson was a spring loaded canon ready to explode, Foreman was a heavy wrecking ball who could break through anything. Both men could take a punch as well, Tyson due to his thick physique and Foreman because he naturally didn't get dazed much. The sad thing is this could have happened in the mid 80's if Foreman hadn't retired. By late 80's it was too late.

@thespy7795

4 жыл бұрын

Foreman didn't retire in the mid 80's. He came back. The Tyson Camp didn't want the fight!

@thespy7795

4 жыл бұрын

@Rob Mike Huck Tyson couldn't Outbox Foreman. He would have to come inside. Tyson's was knocked out 5 times. Only Ali stopped Foreman. George would kill little Mike. Foreman NEVER lost to a fighter under 6 feet tall.

@thespy7795

4 жыл бұрын

@RPG 808 When you comment do it without the crack. Your BELIEFS mean ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! First I'm a retired pro fighter who fought 3 times on Tyson undetcards. Second, I now train and promote. Third Tyson's been hit plenty of times and Buster Douglas started a trend. Foreman would EASILY connect on Tyson. Your comment is so stupud that no SANE person would agree with you. Here's today's lesson idiot: 1990 Mike Tyson was KNOCKED OUT 1996 Mike Tyson was KNOCKED OUT 2002 Mike Tyson was KNOCKED OUT 2004 Mike Tyson was KNOCKED OUT 2005 Mike Tyson was KNOCKED OUT. LIVE WITH IT! Looks like EVERYBODY was beatin that head in for 15 years. So STFU and live with it!!

@thespy7795

4 жыл бұрын

@21LAzgoo we George Foreman wasn't scared of ANYBODY you idiot.

@user-ij9tz1df5f

2 жыл бұрын

@@thespy7795 Absolutely. The most overrated boxer in history. Tyson was a pussycat avoiding any tough fighters like Foreman.

I think what often makes it difficult to compare how "hard" 2 boxers hit, is the physics involved with how each one punches. Mike Tyson hit hard, because he had fast twitch muscles that allowed him to swing at a high speed - where Foreman, had more weight and momentum behind his punches, even if he didn't quite have as much speed.

Of all the truly scary men that have ever fought in the square ring, from any era..... There are none more scary than Big George Foreman...I don't care who you are or were. To think when he returned he said himself that he never threw a punch in anger, not once. Imagine if he did.

@samwheel5162

3 жыл бұрын

Sonny liston was the scariest foreman even said so

@HalleyBay61

3 жыл бұрын

@@samwheel5162 it's all subjective isn't it. He modelled himself on Liston and he was indeed a baaaad man. Who I'm scared of & who you are & who the next person is will all be different ya know.

@samwheel5162

3 жыл бұрын

@@HalleyBay61 I believe that they both are the two most intimidating fighters who ever lived foreman was very tall and strong while liston was an athletic freak with an 84" reach and a 15" fist. I couldn't tell you who'd win but I can tell you it would've probably been the greatest boxing match in history

@HalleyBay61

3 жыл бұрын

@@samwheel5162 Absolutely with you there, they were both horrors for real. Personally, I think George would have him (Sonny quit in both fights against cassius, George didn't know the meaning of the word) but as I have said before, having an opinion doesn't make you right, so who knows lol. At the end of the day they were both freaks of a competitive nature and were scary as hell. I ain't squarin' up against either of em lol

@urbanprojectz

3 жыл бұрын

Stone Buddah.

big george had a high fighting spirit...no retreat no surrender...

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

troll

George foreman boxing legend

Tyson wanted no part of Big George. Cus warned Mike that if he would ever have fought Foreman he would likely be beat. Tyson is a ring historian and came to the same conclusion...I cant beat Foreman.

@msw8966

3 жыл бұрын

Mike defense against foreman is useless stupid!

@msw8966

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman Your correct!

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

@@msw8966 Your correct!

@stavros693000

3 жыл бұрын

cus damato never said that to tyson...your just regurgitating what other morons have said on boxing forums.....cus would never tell mike he couldnt beat someone cause it would affect his confidence......so please stop talking shit and show a link were cus said that....but you cant cause it never happened and tyson wasnt afraid of foreman period!

@msw8966

3 жыл бұрын

@@stavros693000 Yes he did. You dont know what your talking about. Atlas and Rooney said it happened!

Drug moj, srecna ti Nova godina i Bozic...sve najbolje ti od srca zelim i samo nastavi ovako

@BoxingExtra

4 жыл бұрын

Hvala druze, takodje sve najbolje.

@JSM8885

4 жыл бұрын

@@BoxingExtra who do you think would've won in 1991 between Tyson and Holyfield?

@dusanbozic8758

3 жыл бұрын

@@BoxingExtra Prijatelju pa ti si nas ,hahahahahah :D

@joco8290

3 жыл бұрын

@@dusanbozic8758 Balkan boys?

@dusanbozic8758

3 жыл бұрын

@@joco8290 Da :D

Good video man

I agree with a lot of the things Dracula says here but I do know that short guys who fought inside had a lot of trouble with George because he was so big and strong he could push them around with one arm into his uppercut range. Frazier and Cooper did not fare well against him . But Mike was faster than those two and had good stamina when he was young so it would have been interesting

@adibsiddiki7409

4 жыл бұрын

You get a like from me for the casual dracula comment

@lambokiller99

3 жыл бұрын

The problem with tyson was that he didn't have Frazier's stamina or heart, but he was faster and could punch with both hands.

@colorado2455

3 жыл бұрын

@@lambokiller99 foreman was still very dangerous in the clinch something that annoyed tyson a lot especially in his fight against smith.

@HalleyBay61

3 жыл бұрын

Tyson did not have the mental strength when fighting an opponent who was not scared of him and fought back as hard as he was. The times he truly faced adversity, real adversity he lost. Its a shame really because he had every tool in the book apart from the main one.

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

@@HalleyBay61 dumb quotes u read dumb follower why dont u watch matches liar

1960s - Olympic gold medalist 1970s - HW Champion 10 years in retirement 1990s - HW Champion at 46 y old Enough said. Mr. Foreman is top 3, long live and god bless you Champ!

@Narration___Nation

2 жыл бұрын

Muhumid Ali won gold in 1960

@hulkwithagun9749

2 жыл бұрын

We all know that Ali exist

@senatorarmstrong2100

2 жыл бұрын

@@Narration___Nation *60s

@Narration___Nation

2 жыл бұрын

@@senatorarmstrong2100 he won gold medal in 1960 olympics in Rome wdym

@senatorarmstrong2100

2 жыл бұрын

@@Narration___Nation do you even know what 60s is? Its an entire decade

Big George Forman beat cows so fighting a man is nothing.

볼때마다 추억에젖고 행복한 시간입니다 감사합니다

@manuelordones7665

3 жыл бұрын

😇😇😇😇😇😇🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️

Foreman was TERRIFYING...

@petrusamoomo9747

4 жыл бұрын

Lo

@petrusamoomo9747

4 жыл бұрын

Oll

@Godisgood-mm3tr

4 жыл бұрын

Ikr

@azzedinelavezzi3095

4 жыл бұрын

@@petrusamoomo9747 ذ11

@horstschlechte4614

3 жыл бұрын

@@petrusamoomo9747 6y6

George would do the same thing he has done with Frazier

@leroyrs

4 жыл бұрын

Frazier wasn't on Tysons level.

@boogeymann6686

4 жыл бұрын

@@leroyrs Exactly. Frazier had more heart than Tyson and had a lot better stamina. Although he was a bit slower, Frazier would keep coming and would take punishment just to come closer. Taking punches was something I don't think Tyson did too well.

@leroyrs

4 жыл бұрын

@@boogeymann6686 Frazier would have made it 20 sec longer than his son against Tyson. Tyson was faster and stronger and more important - they were on the same height. Frazier - with his style - would have run into a quick knockout.

@robertstdon9280

4 жыл бұрын

DarkSqiZzle088 yes of course. Down goes Tyson .

@robertstdon9280

4 жыл бұрын

Leroyrs yeah he was .Frazier was way greater than Tyson .

russian accent is the perfect one for narrating box history

@selaviemoncherie4375

4 жыл бұрын

Serbian

@sofijadragana2542

4 жыл бұрын

Serbia brate

@antoninopantaleo6028

4 жыл бұрын

Calcio

@greengoblin3936

3 жыл бұрын

I must break you

@terryduaramuri4792

3 жыл бұрын

Lagu png

I am just buying grill but that was nice video:)

George Foreman, not just a great boxer, but a friendly and humble human being with nothing but warm and positive praise for others, never putting down other people, except in the ring. Truly a man of God and our Lord Jesus Christ.

@alex324ization

3 жыл бұрын

he chaned a lot considered as bad guy in the 70's. So anyone can change:-)

@ebperformance8436

Жыл бұрын

If I had to pick who to fight 40YO Forman vs Tyson…I would pick Tyson! Formans hands is bigger than my head. Getting hit with a Forman punch…might spell death or brain damage. I don’t think any of my punches would effect George Forman….I would have to fight him under MMA rules, I would have to nail Forman with a jumping front knee kick to the face.

@Mayan_88694

7 ай бұрын

@@ebperformance8436foreman would obliterate you, not even close

@Mayan_88694

7 ай бұрын

@@ebperformance8436you would get sent to the graveyard if you fought foreman.

@ebperformance8436

7 ай бұрын

@@Mayan_88694 no shit Genius!

Форман и Тайсон это два великих бойца современности, которые достойны друг - друга !!!

Why didn’t they fight? Legend has it that while watching old fights of Foreman and not knowing Foreman would ever comeback to boxing Cus D’amato told Tyson when he was young that Foreman would be a bad match up for him- after Cus died, Foremen made a surprising comeback but Tyson always remembered what his old trainer told him and steered clear of old George.

@shilfelandero9627

4 жыл бұрын

Donie nyetes boxxing

@BobSaint

Жыл бұрын

Mike 🦆 d big George.

tyson fan boys have made tyson the world champion of unfought fights

@stavros693000

3 жыл бұрын

true, but peak tyson is a nightmare for anyone head to head!

@phantomstratocaster

3 жыл бұрын

@@stavros693000 ali was unmatched in clock speed

@stavros693000

3 жыл бұрын

@@phantomstratocaster yeah a 60s ali/clay was something else.....very special indeed!

@Sorted906

3 жыл бұрын

Tucker gave a prime Lewis a hell of a fight, despite Tucker being well past it. Tyson also used Lewis as a punching bag during their first encounter, according to witnesses. He also used Oliver Mc Call for a punch bag. If a young Tyson had ever had a scratch on him, then your comment would be justified

@dangerranger1680

2 жыл бұрын

Haha true. Prime Tyson gets incinerated by Foreman, Frazier, Ali, Lewis, Holyfield, etc.

I would even watch them box it out today!

What a warrior!

Foreman comeback makes me wonder if Tyson can beat him with his comeback and be the Youngest&Oldest HW Champ in the World... that would be sooooo crazy and awesome..

@DH-tl5et

4 жыл бұрын

Sure does make you wonder. Mike is a different breed of human he’s a young 53 year old. But the heavyweight division has evolved since Foreman’s comeback. Today’s heavyweights would be way too big for an older Mike Tyson. Mike might be getting in the ring with Fury for an exhibition. It would purely be a spectacle but it’d be historical for sure. I’d prefer him to have an actual fight especially the Shannon Briggs one. Even though they have great respect for each other

@sebastianb.4048

2 жыл бұрын

@@DH-tl5et mike did beat 6'4 people easily. But i gotta say that he is too old to getting back into boxing now

@anonymoose2474

2 жыл бұрын

@@sebastianb.4048 the sport has evolved and fighters use their range much better now, plus mike used PEDs on the day of the fight regularly back then, so he wouldn't have nearly as much spring cannon effect

@sebastianb.4048

2 жыл бұрын

@@anonymoose2474 i still believe that if mike tyson uses his amazing head movement he would be able to get into really close range and Fury's long arms would not stand any chance, and btw, height doesnt matter that much on boxing, specifically reach does, thats why Sonny Liston was the hardest hitter, huge hands and huge reach to stretch his whole arm

@anonymoose2474

2 жыл бұрын

@@sebastianb.4048 height absolutely matters and so does reach, besides the fact that reach generally is related to height I won't say it's impossible Tyson would win but I think it's insane to say he would win for sure. I've got it 70/30 on foreman

Awesome 👁️

Is this video uploaded like once a week? I swear I’ve seen this like 10 times

@CousinJesse1

4 жыл бұрын

Same.

@Sancar___

4 жыл бұрын

❤️🇹🇷❤️

@sirgalahad1376

4 жыл бұрын

You’ve got a lot of time to watch KZread videos now Mr. President

@joesribahagia9458

4 жыл бұрын

@SONIC ART . . . . .. .. ..

@joesribahagia9458

4 жыл бұрын

@SONIC ART . . . .

This was the GSP vs Khabib f it’s time. The stars came close to aligning, but in both cases it just never happened. They both could’ve been two of the most amazing spectacles in combat sports history.

@eboymorales3047

2 жыл бұрын

George Foreman (George St Pier) vs Khabib Nurmagumedov (Mike Tyson)

@eboymorales3047

2 жыл бұрын

"Where you at George!?" and "Is that all you got George!?"

@yes-qw6om

Жыл бұрын

@@eboymorales3047 khabib won

@CocaineCowboyJones

10 ай бұрын

​@@yes-qw6omKhabib is a one trick pony, GSP was Jack of all traits

@yes-qw6om

10 ай бұрын

lol what you talking about, i think you mean earnie shavers is one trick pony because no one trick pony go undefeated@@CocaineCowboyJones

both are best fighters...cant compare.

Hey, its never too late. They are both still alive. Make it happen.

@douglaspaterson5269

3 жыл бұрын

Battle of the senior citizens.🤣

@cjichida8174

2 жыл бұрын

@@douglaspaterson5269 😂😂😂😂😂

@amma9518

2 жыл бұрын

No chance foreman about 70 right now

@douglaspaterson5269

2 жыл бұрын

@@amma9518 Bet he can still hit hard as hell!👊🏿

@dakhla3254

2 жыл бұрын

Foreman is 80 years old. Are you crasy? Stupid

George Foreman is a g. imagine coming back as an old man and fucking up all the young bucks this bad. Dude was a monster.

@x4lifeful

2 жыл бұрын

He truly was.. Prime forman would kill tyson head on like he did with Joe Fraser..the dude didn't punch he dropped bombs.. Looking casual

@user-mh7xo6rl3d

2 жыл бұрын

@@x4lifeful yea....tyson boutta get grilled by george 💥

@cmoneytheman

2 жыл бұрын

@@x4lifeful wrong didnt fight like joe dumb follower

@x4lifeful

2 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman omg u still crying lil kid..go to a metal hospital.. This ass is stacking me.. Rofl

@cmoneytheman

2 жыл бұрын

@@x4lifeful He truly was..Prime foreman would kill tyson head on like he did with Joe Fraser.. the dude didn't punch he dropped bombs.. Looking casual

Sounds like Dracula narrating the video.

@frikfrak5286

3 жыл бұрын

Starts fucken counting ,.shit is sesame.street now

@SuperBigdude77

3 жыл бұрын

😅

@gioflores

3 жыл бұрын

@@frikfrak5286 BAHAHAH

Only a early Prime George vs Prime Mike even makes much sense. If it happened... either one could bomb the other guy. BUT a Prime Ali, over both of them. As Prime Ali proved with Prime George... TO SMART! Ali was bringing well thought out tactics. G.O.A.T. = M. Ali. Ali.

@thespy7795

4 жыл бұрын

George would have killed Mike in ANY era!

@kinp00

3 жыл бұрын

This video has nothing to do with Ali. Get off Ali’s nuts.

@cmoneytheman

2 жыл бұрын

@@thespy7795 troll

@thespy7795

2 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman troll

@cmoneytheman

2 жыл бұрын

@@thespy7795 George would have killed Mike in ANY era!

foreman in his prime vs. "iron mike" in his prime! (*whew 😵 that would've been something)

@tylergrey7744

3 жыл бұрын

Who gives a fuck Floyd mayweather would beat them both

@mindyourbusiness4440

3 жыл бұрын

I'm afraid it would have gone exactly like the frazier match. You can't out muscle foreman you gotta be smart and avoid him like ali in order to win

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

@@mindyourbusiness4440 the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george dumb followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed george height is advantage pushes means he dominates his power was to much uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast swammers lose fast dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened heshowed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds george said for dwight he said he had trouble hittin him even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George so how would George win stop sayin dumb quotes u read and tyson fought nothin like joe u dummy u dumb follower

@MemerCat0

3 жыл бұрын

@@tylergrey7744 lmao yeah right, there is a weight division for a reason

@elgato7684

3 жыл бұрын

@@tylergrey7744 lmao 😂 nice joke

Muito bom.

Big George! ❤️

The late Constantine "Cus" D'amato had already told Michael Gerard Tyson that he would have never defeated George Edward Foreman, Sr., PERIOD!!!

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

stop trolling sayin dumb quotes u read never said that for him dummy

@msw8966

3 жыл бұрын

I love how these dummies think they know everything about boxing and they have no clue that was said by cuss. He knew Tyson could not beat George Foreman. You Fanboys need to wake up Tyson was not invincible especially against the guy I like big George. Tyson knew it to he's a historian. So do more research instead of calling people names when you are the dummy!!!

@brucescott4261

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman ...I've been watching this sport before you were even born. Not only Foreman would have stopped Tyson, an array of heavy punchers such as Liston, who could knock out his opponents with jab, Williams, Frazier, Shavers, Lyle, Cooney, et al. would have stopped your baddest man on the planet. The last time you replied to me, you couldn't give anything explanatory about how Tyson would have stopped the aforementioned heavyweight greats. You're not a boxing expert, analyst or historian, PERIOD!!! Many true boxing fans had already told you the truth about yourself. You don't have anything else better to do. Therefore, you continued with the name calling, insults, and so on. Perhaps your life probably doesn't amount to anything, if you have to get on my post.

@brucescott4261

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman ...I don't think you really know what trolling means, to say the least. You're just another Tysonite, not a historian.

@tklatt8431

3 жыл бұрын

@@brucescott4261 🤣🤣

Ti si balkanac? Au, super kanal

I love the accent bro

@kisamehoshigaki8917

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah

I just love these fantasy fights Boxing Extra,please keep them coming.Tyson was an incredibly talented heavyweight who really should have been Muhammad Ali's main rival for the the title of GOAT.However every fighter,no matter how talented,has that one opponent that's all wrong for him-in Tyson's case it is George Foreman,even an ' old ' George Foreman. Foreman's freakish physical strength plus his incredibly heavy hands would be just the right attributes to defeat Tyson.

@spreadeagle2561

4 жыл бұрын

@21LAzgoo we - Yep, I agree.I would pick prime Foreman against Tyson, but as you say Tyson's speed would caused a lot of problems for the comeback version of Big George.

@michaelmohrle1773

Жыл бұрын

You are out of your mind if you think Tyson is Anywhere near Ali or Foreman or Frazier. Tyson never came back from losing a fight and was KOed by Buster Douglass, Danny Williams, and Kevin McBride !!!! Let alone Holyfield and Lewis !!!

@ascendediam

Жыл бұрын

​@@spreadeagle2561 the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed george height is advantage pushes means he dominates his power was to much uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast swammers lose fast dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds george said for dwight he said he had trouble hittin him even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick dwight style like joe but better defense ali and jim fast punchers and defense frank real slow and almost as George smith slow and strong

@ascendediam

Жыл бұрын

​@@michaelmohrle1773stop repeating lies wasnt in shape for none of those mike beats more advanced fighters

@ronjones3184

Жыл бұрын

@@ascendediam such as who????????

Me lembro que ainda moleque fiquei insistindo até a madrugada para assistir essa luta que a rede que apresentava era a rede globo de televisão. Velhos tempos do boxing!!!

@camarafodie7302

4 жыл бұрын

W we

@joaodiogo112

4 жыл бұрын

Não houve a luta é só um comparação

@Shagrir

4 жыл бұрын

Mas essa luta nunca aconteceu. Ficou acordado esperando o que? kkkkkk e ainda diz que tem bagagem no boxe..

Foreman would have KOed Tyson. It may have been late in the fight, but it would happened. George has too much Ring intelligence not to beat Tyson!!!!

@ruralrebeltory7474

4 жыл бұрын

SONIC ART Yes, yes I do. Foreman would have KOed Tyson.

@ruralrebeltory7474

4 жыл бұрын

SONIC ART I say it comes down what their entire run of Foreman’s and Tyson’s careers showed. Both started off very well, both were knock out punchers who lead with anger and often intimidated their opponents. Both fighters had incredible success and had people calling them the best ever. Then both fighters had loses. Foreman lost to Ali. Now Foreman did had some good fights after that first lose, but untimely lost to Jimmy Young. Tyson lost to Buster Douglas. Foreman left boxing and came back to boxing later. In his 2nd career as a boxer Foreman made peace with his loses, now did he want the belt back, yes, would he even fought Ali and Young had they still been fighting I bet he would have. Foreman had his edge back, the “I Will Win Feeling” all legendary boxes have and use to help them win. He changed his style worked to his second career strengths, he knew he was a different person than his first boxing career and he adapted and fought in styles he could win at during that second career. Foreman fought and went back up the line once again. He had loses one to Morrison, I always questioned how that fight was handled, but that is a different topic, and then he lost to Holyfield in an epic fight. Then Foreman did what I believe made him a legendary fighter, he once again got past those loses and beat Moore with an impressive 10th knock out. From the start of his comeback, you could tell from hearing him talk he had studied boxing more and I bet had watched a ton of fights with trainers and people over the years. He knew styles and history of Boxing. He knew what he thought he could do to win the title back. Now due to his age I believe while he knew in his mind and heart what it took to win he was not always able to get his body to do it. He did though find a way to get that belt back! Tyson after his lose to Buster Douglas was ever never the same fighter he was before Douglas. Tyson like Foreman had some wins. But he just was not the same fighter who could come out scare his opponent and expect to win every fight. Tyson has his longest break from Boxing. He did again win after 4 Plus years off he had. He even won two championship belts. Tyson next fought Holyfield, and suffered another loss he did not handle well. Then there was the second lose to Holyfield where things just went off the rails. He had some wins after that second loss to Holyfield but was not the fighter he once was and never did find a way to be a fighter who could go out and win fights. Seems to me he just lost the will to be a good fighter. Tyson never did have the ring and boxing knowledge to learn how to be more than a puncher. He never learned how to change styles. Once people learned how to beat him he was finished as a fighter. That inability to change and grow as a fighter is why Foreman would have beat Tyson. It may have been a longer fight with Tyson being frustrated by Foreman and his style as a bigger and taller heavyweight, and his inability to KO Foreman, Tyson would have left himself open for knock downs and most likely a knock out from Foreman.

@ruralrebeltory7474

4 жыл бұрын

Ogi Kovacevic I disagree, but that is the fun of talking about boxers who never fought and what might have been. That short two year period would have been The Only Time he would have even had any type of chance. Even then I do not think he could he have handled Foreman’s punches. Certainly later in Tyson’s career Foreman would have avenged any miracle victory Tyson could have had earlier.

@thespy7795

4 жыл бұрын

@SONIC ART Foreman in 5...Easily.

@thespy7795

4 жыл бұрын

@@Ogikc Your comment is so stupid it doesn't deserve to be critiqued. Damn what a Stupid comment.

I love mike tyson but foreman was my favorite HW champion.

Frazier was a beast, the 3rd time Ali was about to give up but the corner of Frazier stopped even after much requests from Frazier to let him fight.

@adnanhashmi2742

3 жыл бұрын

Not true actually both were not quitting but fraziers eyes were badly swollen so his trainer stopped the fight

@brucescott4261

3 жыл бұрын

@@adnanhashmi2742 ...Thanks-a-million, Adnan! The Greatest and Smokin' Joe weren't quitters, PERIOD!!! Eddie Futch threw in the towel that night! Frazier couldn't see anything in front of him!

@jacobh7188

3 жыл бұрын

@@adnanhashmi2742 nope, Ali admitted in beforehand that he was ready to quit. Tbh, I'm no way disrespecting Ali, in fact I had him winning almost all rounds in the 3rd fight, but Ali did admit he was about to refuse to go into the last round and quit before Futch threw in the towel.

@OSThrowback

3 жыл бұрын

@@jacobh7188 This is actually probably true. One of Ali’s corner guys stated when Ali came back to the corner he said “Cut ‘’em off” but Dundee saw something was up in Frazier’s corner and held off. At which point Futch stopped it. This is in the book ‘Ali’

@shagunpsuresh639

3 жыл бұрын

@@adnanhashmi2742 not really, Muhmmad couldn't stand up, even collapsed to the floor when announced Joe's corner threw the towel, while Joe was still willing to kill Ali. I'd suggest you to watch the documentary on the third fight.

Thank God it never happened. Foreman might have committed murder in the ring..

@thespy7795

4 жыл бұрын

@21LAzgoo we Foreman would have beat him WORSE than Douglas, Holyfield and Lewis COMBINED!!!

@thespy7795

4 жыл бұрын

@21LAzgoo we Notice.....EVERYONE knows you don't have a clue???

@johncreedon7847

4 жыл бұрын

Yea,murdering thin air, Missing every time and tiring out, Just like he did against Ali

@thespy7795

4 жыл бұрын

@@johncreedon7847 Not Older, Wiser George. Ask Gerry Cooney.

@bubuc

4 жыл бұрын

@@thespy7795 Te hülye vagy a bokszért !!!85-89 Kevin Roony Mike Tyson and would have destroyed opponents Douglas Holyfield Lennox set that fat slow George !!!why didn't he get a rematch in Mike 90 ??? They were afraid Douglas knew he was preparing properly and killing that balloon-headed Buster !!!!

If iron Mike Tyson and big George foreman were both about 23 years old, and fought in a 12 round fight in todays era. It would be a very scary fight.

Cada kien en su tiempo y estilo son delos mejores

Duelo de titans muito bom

Foreman was a monster, he would be to much for Tyson - too small.

@jonskitch8082

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman no bigger than cooper

@HalleyBay61

2 жыл бұрын

One word.........belief. Two fighters, one had it, one didn't. Tyson did not have it and it showed many times.

@darinheight6293

2 жыл бұрын

I disagree Tyson would’ve tore foreman apart.

@bigboris5774

2 жыл бұрын

@@darinheight6293 Foreman proved he could beat elite level fighters he gave a prime Frazier and Holyfield some the toughest fights of their careers. Tyson never beat anybody as good as Foreman. The most similar opponent to Tyson that George fought was Frazier who’s he destroyed in 2. Prime Mike wouldn’t last 5 round with either version of George,

@bigboris5774

2 жыл бұрын

@@ascendediam (1) Your comment is virtually unreadable because you put 17 paragraphs after every other word (2) Frazier is obviously not similar to Tyson, but he is by far the closest to Tyson that there’s ever been. And in said fight Foreman showed what he would do to Tyson, whenever Joe got on the inside George simply pushed him out of range. Mike would definitely do better than Frazier because of his speed, but there’s simply no way that Mike could beat one of the greatest boxers ever in their prime when he never even proved he could defeat a Top 50 fighter in their prime. There’s no way Mike could KO George his chin was made of titanium, and by the time it gets to the later rounds Tyson would always get gassed. George KOs Mike in Round 4-6.

All I got from this was it's Buster Douglas's fault that this didn't happen 😂. The Past vs. Present fight would have been so dope.

MIKE TYSON AMAZING BRASIL 2020

I wish Mike Tyson was my friend and trainer. I used to lift weights, and gave up at 25, cause I got a mental illness. Mike Tyson's heart is like a lion: he never stops. He's the best in the world ever!

@DamienNeverwinter

Жыл бұрын

Start again -you are your own best trainer

@ascendediam

Жыл бұрын

@@DamienNeverwinter follower

@ascendediam

Жыл бұрын

@@DamienNeverwinter lunatic

Difícil pero pienso que después de un combate terrible hubiese ganado forman , obviamente con todo mi respeto hacia Mike Tyson un gran y verdadero campeon

AMEN

Yeah, it’s so frustrating. We’d have loved to have seen Tyson vs Morrison and Tyson vs Foreman. Two fights that should have happened.

George was a great fighter

Has FPSRussia returned to KZread?! I think so... ;-)

and know we got foreman grills

how are you so wise to put flash after every scene?

Duel antara big george d mike tyson tak mungkin terjadi karena dua petinju saling menghormati...

Foreman is too slow would have lost to Iron

Tyson the best, punch and velocity

He was scared of you and you were glad he was scared LOL

Esses dois são os mitos do boxe

@blaistoisegameplay9181

3 жыл бұрын

E o maior de todos MOHAMMAD ALI

I'm fan of Foreman, of Mike Tyson, of Ali. The oldest heavyweight world champion - George Foreman. Amazing.

Este si hubiera sido el combate del siglo. Lástima. Con ña misma edad tengo muchas dudas que hubiera ocurrido.

Would have been Epic.. Shame it never took place

A retired tyson vs a retired foreman. It could still happen in 2020.

@abelincoln5698

4 жыл бұрын

George has a quarter billion in the bank and hes 70. Not likely. I wouldn't be surprised if Mike fights again though. He needs the bread and he's not too old to get in shape

@Head318Hunter

3 жыл бұрын

Foreman is pushing 80 now

@hfjtrytry9216

3 жыл бұрын

@@abelincoln5698 "He needs the bread". In no way does tyson need bread lol he earns 6m a year from his weed farm alone

It all depends on which mike tyson fights and which George foreman fights , i am a firm believer that mike tyson would still be undefeated with his mentor cus d’amato

@RazorEdge2006

3 жыл бұрын

'70s Prime Foreman beats '80s Prime Tyson. But Old Foreman vs Post-Prime Tyson in the '90s is anyone's game.

Different eras... If matched when both men were in their prime - it would have been one hell of a bout that I would've loved to hear Cosell announce.

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

tyson would win his skills was to great and he was to fast

@the_lost_navigator

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman I want to agree, yet the sheer size and strength of Big George makes me wonder - if he connected with those hammering kidney-shots and repeated combinations of his lethal 'left-right's... yet Tyson's sheer brutal upper-cuts and wrecking-ball swings seemed heavier-landing than his 'contemporary' - Frazier... regardless - one hell of a bout.

@cmoneytheman

2 жыл бұрын

@@the_lost_navigator they was like the same size george was slow and easy to read which never beat Mike

If only it was realized

I would have loved to have seen this fight happen, cause yes Tyson was much younger, but Foreman was a Hammer that with one punch even at his age would have put out the lights on one of my old time favorite Tyson, as was Foreman!❤️👌

@cmoneytheman

4 жыл бұрын

George never had 1 punch power

@hechavarria100

4 жыл бұрын

cmoneytheman Really? Just because Ali was able to go with the punches, it doesn’t mean George didn’t have the power punch. He had such a punch that he landed that 1 punch to regain the Heavyweight title at 40!🤯🤣

@cmoneytheman

4 жыл бұрын

@@hechavarria100 I said George never had 1 punch ko power like a deontay u would know this if u watched

@hechavarria100

4 жыл бұрын

You mean Wilder? Please!🤯🤣He’s slow, never in the caliber of the legends! Even Fat Ruiz is better. The heavyweight division sucks now a days. Trust me I started watching boxing when I was 12 and I just turned 69. And the heavyweights fighters of yesteryears? Are gone. I hope it changes. Ruiz would be great if he ever turns the fat into muscles.😱🤣

@cmoneytheman

4 жыл бұрын

@@hechavarria100 slow dont matter he got 1 punch power george never had that he had power that made folks fall from mutiple hits

Foreman beats Tyson. George never lost to anyone who came at him. Ever. Tyson only only comes forward.

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

stop trolling sayin dumb quotes George loses u dumb and george did lose to tom and almost lost to dwight so u a liar follower and almost got beat by Ron and tyson dont fight only front stop sayin flawed quotes u read

@michelsourama9260

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman qqqqqqqqqqqq

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

@@michelsourama9260 dont know wha that means

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

thats a lie follower he lost to tom and almost to dwight stop sayin follower quotes thats lies

@nigeriankami7028

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman tyson couldn’t beat buster douglas holyfield smashed douglas holyfield also smashed tyson when a prime holyfield fought george he put all his power into his punches and george didn’t even move

This white lights at the Cuts Freaks ya minde😵

Everybody else probably think that it would have ended in a knockout one way or another. I'm one of the few people who think that it would have ended in a decision. Tyson has never lost a decision, but he can get tired late.

Mike Tyson was a one of great fights ever, he was born to fight & never scared who he fight with, not many people like him in history, also I have a great respect for people like George foreman, Evander Holyfield, Ali,& joe Frazier

Forman is one of the greatest

The Youngest and the Oldest champion in the world.

That was beautiful George hit Moore with that short punch that but Moore to 💤

Prime mike tyson

Foreman lo hubiera liquidado rápido , pues boxeador de baja estatura no tienen muchas futuro y si avanzó es porque no habían grandes boxeadores en ese momento, todo lo contrario de foreman quien enfrentó a grandes entre los grandes, frazier mismo que fue despachado por foreman hubiese hecho lo mismo con tyson que fue invento de la prensa y nada más, el gran George se hubiera paseado con el y con cualquier otro ,a excepción del más grande, Ali

@gabrielvasquez1077

2 жыл бұрын

Jajaja lo que se lee hoy en dia. Buena esa crack.

They should still do it

Hi, wvy dont you do foreman vs holmes..they had borned the same year and didnt fought each other

@spreadeagle2561

4 жыл бұрын

That would have been a fantastic fight.

@obbor4

4 жыл бұрын

Both of them would have beaten Tyson if they had fought him in their primes. Foreman would have KO'd Tyson, old or young.

@spreadeagle2561

4 жыл бұрын

@@obbor4 - I think you could be right mate.No shame on Tyson, Foreman and Holmes were both absolute ATGs.

Tyson

@ascendediam

Жыл бұрын

the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed george height is advantage pushes means he dominates his power was to much uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast swammers lose fast dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds george said for dwight he said he had trouble hittin him even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage they say works for george dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George but when they say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick dwight style like joe but better defense ali and jim fast punchers and defense frank real slow and almost as George smith slow and strong Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd

George Foreman in his prime would have KNOCKED OUT MIKE TYSON just like he did Joe Frazier, and Ken Norton. those are the type of fighters George Foreman knocked out quick the ones that stood right in front of him.. There was a good chance that George Foreman could have even knocked out Mike Tyson even in his 40s if the fight ever happened. Again those are the fighters that got knocked out by George the easiest.. Tyson's head would have been right there for him to hit right where most of his power was. George had the best knockout percentage in history he fought 81 fights, and knocked out 68!! He only lost 5 times. AND THE ONLY PERSON TO EVER KNOCK HIM OUT WAS MUHAMMAD ALI IN GEORGE FOREMAN'S PRIME!! You can see how great Muhammad Ali is just by looking at how an old fat George Foreman fought the great fighters in the 90s in what he did against them versus what Muhammad Ali who wasn't even in his prime did to George Foreman in George Foreman's prime. You can easily see that George Foreman would have knocked out any of the fighters he fought in the 90s including evander holyfield that he almost knocked out because he was too slow he couldn't finish the job. If Foreman was in his prime like he was with Ali HE WOULD HAVE OBLITERATED EVANDER HOLYFIELD WITHIN THREE ROUNDS!! THERE'S NO WAY HOLYFIELD WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO TAKE THE PRESSURE! George in his prime could throw punches Non-Stop and put so much pressure.

@Head318Hunter

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman You ain't too bright is ye ?

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

@@Head318Hunter You ain't too bright is ye?

@michaelmohrle1773

2 жыл бұрын

And Foreman never was even knocked down or took a standing 8 count in his comeback 87-97, that is amazing no 90s fightet could floor him.

@ascendediam

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelmohrle1773 And Foreman never was even knocked down or took a standing 8 count in his comeback 87-97, that is amazing no 90s fighter could floor him.

@michaelmohrle1773

2 жыл бұрын

@@ascendediam Why are you repeating what I wrote ???

😆 This Mexican commentary is a punch on itself damn.

Its crazy how Tyson was scared of Foreman and Foreman of Tyson.

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

how do we know who was scared stop being a dumb follower

I'm sorry but I'm still going to have to go out Mike Tyson listen I know that big George Foreman is a big deal he has the height in the reach empower but Tyson had power to speed agility standing, everything was precision for a heavyweight small guy with huge physique had the speed like no other that would be the term point of the fight

@ascendediam

Жыл бұрын

the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed george height is advantage pushes means he dominates his power was to much uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast swammers lose fast dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds george said for dwight he said he had trouble hittin him even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage they say works for george dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick dwight style like joe but better defense ali and jim fast punchers and defense frank real slow and almost as George smith slow and strong Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd

Ali was the only person that KO'ed Big George, he was never KO'ed again, but all of Tyson's losses were knock outs, even Evander Hoyfield said No one beat him up like Foreman did, in my opinion Tyson stands no chance against George Foreman

@MuhammadAli-kg7ij

3 жыл бұрын

@@cmoneytheman here we go again, another fan boy, Mike Tyson is the most overrated boxer of all times, don't get me wrong, he was a killer but he doesn't even deserve to be in top 5 the greatest boxers of all times, he competed in the best era of boxing and he only beat bums, Tyson vs riddick bowe, Tyson vs david tua, Tyson vs tommy Morrison Tyson vs ray mercer Tyson vs vitali Klitschko Tyson vs vlad Klitschko Tyson vs james toney,Tyson vs michael Moorer, Tyson vs Oliver mccall , Tyson vs George foreman, Tyson vs shannon briggs, how can someone avoid all these matches and go down in the history as the best, the best boxer boxer Tyson beat was an out of prime Larry Holmes, Tyson couldn't finish avarage fighters like bonecrusher Smith, Tony Tucker, Mitch Green at the peak of his prime, he got Ko'ed by Buster Douglass, Holyfield destroyed Tyson twice, Tyson stand no chance vs Big George whether George was in his prime or not

@cmoneytheman

3 жыл бұрын

@@MuhammadAli-kg7ij the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george dumb followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed george height is advantage pushes means he dominates his power was to much uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast swammers lose fast dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened heshowed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds george said for dwight he said he had trouble hittin him even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George so why would tyson have no chance tyson was to fast and great at defense fool and could only be beat by outboxing which was never Georges style and tyson wasnt knocked out many times liar and ron beat up George worst then anybody liar u meant George had no chance stop using dumb quotes u read dumbboy

@thespy7795

2 жыл бұрын

@@MuhammadAli-kg7ij Great Comment!

@Mar_real

2 жыл бұрын

@@MuhammadAli-kg7ij ali too is overrated except joe and forman meh

@Mar_real

2 жыл бұрын

@@MuhammadAli-kg7ij in is prime is prob the greatest soo

George once said he wanted no part in being in the same ring with Mike. Post retirement, of course. But Mike did struggle against Lennox Lewis, but George wasn't as fast as Lewis. Who knows who would have won?

@cmoneytheman

2 жыл бұрын

Why u comparing a outtashape mike george fought nothing like him he was slow sloopy and easy to read mike would wins is what would happen its obvious Watch slow fighters who was easy to read like george they got countered easy and ko all of them You dummies expose yourself watch matches instead of saying dumb quotes that make no sense

@paulrevere1479

Жыл бұрын

I believe that was George just being a nice humble guy talking. He feared no man

Tyson wanted NO smoke. Even today, as crazy as Mike still is he never mentions Foreman.

@cmoneytheman

2 жыл бұрын

U slow