Buy Metal Gear Solid Master Collection Vol.1 here: amzn.to/3YZ0OIN Thanks for using my Amazon Affiliate links!

So happy to finally be able to play these games my Switch. So many memories of playing these games on my PS2 and PS3.

Thanks for creating this video. Metal Gear Solid is my favorite game franchise of all time. Especially snake eater. It will always be my favorite game ever.

I don't care what people say im grinding the money to get these games these games look fun and thats all that matters idc about how well it runs or how it looks

@BrickmanZero

9 ай бұрын

They are fun and have a great story for sure!

@Brayden-xn1cl

9 ай бұрын

@@BrickmanZero I just got it and it's fun as hell

Really looking forward to that remake next year.

I’ll see the gameplay when it launches.

The black levels on your PS3 capture look messed up

Does anyone remember the shot where Sokolov throws papers into the fire? It was dropping a lot of frames on every single console Really interesting whether switch would have solid 30 fps in that scene Although the 30 fps by itself is a pretty big disappointment

@mokat

11 ай бұрын

fps locker homebrew should be able to get it running at 60 fps with overclocking

The more i see this the more i want to jump into old hardware. They just dont make them like they use too 😂

It’s like if the comparison here is to see how the PS3 is the better upscaled version

Sube mas cinematicas y gamrplay de esto

The video comparison seems fake in my opinion because it is shown in the same frame rate. We know that the HD collection on the PS3 run at 60fps and we also know that the Switch version runs at 30fps. Yet in this comparison both games have a matching frame rate.

@javierbarron8605

11 ай бұрын

If its fake, what do u think is being compared? 3:06 Look at Zero’s head movement at .25x speed. It’s noticeably choppier on switch.

@ObsessedGeorge

11 ай бұрын

@@javierbarron8605 Shit, you are right. I have seen way choppier 30 frames though and I though it was fake. My apology to the creator.

@javierbarron8605

11 ай бұрын

@@ObsessedGeorge Its harder to spot than usual, it took me longer to notice it too.

@ObsessedGeorge

11 ай бұрын

@@javierbarron8605 Check out WarThunder PS4 and PS5 comparison and see the jarring difference on 30 vs 60 frames, friend!

@randomt800kiddo2

11 ай бұрын

@@ObsessedGeorgeprobably just frametiming, the original mgs3 on ps2 was 30 fps and it wasn't that choppy

Where is Skull Face?

Slightly sharper on switch with more contrast. I prefer the softer look on ps3 with more aggressive AA.

Can someone point to a spot where I'd notice a difference?

@HeyAaron12

11 ай бұрын

Stills section

@nezkeys79

11 ай бұрын

​@@HeyAaron12still looks the same, lol 😅

@Just_normal_youtube_channel

10 ай бұрын

3:39 The switch stutters a lot more than the PS3, and simply looks nowhere near as smooth.

Damn did they not even include the sub titles on the switch version 😂 I'd so that's just unacceptable

PS3の方これRGBフルレンジの設定になってねーだろ黒レベルがおかしいわ

The 1st time i played it on PS2 looked incredible, then i bought the 3DS version and i was blown away with the 3D effect, but this, this looks bad for current gen 😢

This comparison is 100% fake. The video on the left is the ps vita version. The scaling is almost 1:1.

@thomasvettikad

9 ай бұрын

no shit. they used the vita ver for switch

How does a game perform _better_ on 2 generation older hardware?? If PS3 can do 60fps, why can't Switch? Makes no sense.

@GhostGamer799

11 ай бұрын

Lazy developer

@femto8402

11 ай бұрын

​@@GhostGamer799Such a stupid statement. The devs are not to blame, Konami is. This port is probably very low budget with a very short time of development as always with Konami.

@GhostGamer799

11 ай бұрын

@@femto8402 ahem ghotam knight 30fps in only next gen other games who is 30fps by now they push quality over performance I had enough of it I Konami did bad things they may change by the backlash they want to sale if not they wouldn't re release the games a second time

@MichaelM28

11 ай бұрын

A Switch is basically the same generation hardware as a PS3

@MichaelM28

11 ай бұрын

@@GhostGamer799Redfall and Starfield are also only 30fps 😂

So i read reports that these new versions are 720p as well... So a low effort Port....

@MorrisseyMuse

11 ай бұрын

True, which is why Switch is the only way to go with this collection, portability baby! :)

@DeadPhoenix86DP

11 ай бұрын

@@MorrisseyMuse So how is that emulators can run this game at 4K on similar hardware vs PS5 and Series X. I think even the Switch could do 1080p docked.

@WllKiedSnake

11 ай бұрын

​@@DeadPhoenix86DPLow effort port mate.

@DeadPhoenix86DP

11 ай бұрын

@@WllKiedSnake That's what i already said. I guess I'll wait for sale until its down to 10 bucks. No way I'm paying 60 for a 12 year old port...

@PlynDoChlodnicy

11 ай бұрын

i dont know where did u read these reports.... there is no confirmation that mgs2 and 3 is gonna be in 720p.... people are talking that these game might have option for 1080p and 1440p, u are lying just to hate this port or u are delusional

The switch version not only runs at 30fps instead of 60fps but also has worst anti-aliasing. It looks like a very rushed port. As always Konami put very little budget in the making of this compilation, MGS deserve better.

@MadDjentah

11 ай бұрын

It seems like Konami gathering money for MGS3 Delta, using nostalgic players to buy half-baked сrap. Goddamn, with a gems like Quake 2 Remaster in 2023, this MGS3 for Switch looks like a spitting in the face.

@MichaelM28

11 ай бұрын

Still better than the Silent Hill HD Collection

@MichaelM28

11 ай бұрын

@@MadDjentahQuake is anything but a gem

@femto8402

11 ай бұрын

@@MadDjentah I totally agree that's exactly it. Even MGS1 looks crap, it's just straight basic emulation without any improvements at all, you can get way better results using the Duckstation emulator on pc. God I wish all ports were as good (and cheap) as Quake 2

@MadDjentah

11 ай бұрын

​@@MichaelM28Quake 2, not Quake. If second one's remaster is "something else" to you, it's your problem, I have a lot of fun. Waiting for the third one and hoping they include OST from dreamcast as a bonus.

Mr Kojima?

Soy yo o apenas s even mejoras graficas que ni se notan xd por lo menos no le pusieron los graficos de la play 1 xd

@DanteMx01

11 ай бұрын

No le pueden poner gráficos de ps1 poque el juego es de PS2 y el remaster de ps3 es casi lo mismo que la versión original no cambia casi nada de PS2 a ps3 y lo mismo pasa con ps4 y switch no hay mucho que cambiarle a menos que se haga algo como el gta trilogy que s ele ca,Niño el motor gráfico

It's impressive...how a remaster can look worst than when the game was first released 😂

@Aqua_Lus

11 ай бұрын

Your comment contains two inaccuracies and, as a consequence, does not make any sense. The first false claim that you make in your comment is that Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater - Master Collection Version is a remaster. This is incorrect. The game is simply a port of Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater - HD Edition and will be released on the PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Nintendo Switch, and Microsoft Windows (Steam) this October. It will also be released on the PlayStation 4 at a later date, which is yet to be announced by Konami. The second false claim that you make is that MGS3:HD is the original version of the game. This is also incorrect. The original version of the game, Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater, was initially released for the PlayStation 2 in 2004. MGS3:HD, on the other hand, is a remastered version of Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence on the PS2 and was initially released in late 2011 for the PS3 and Xbox 360. Although bear in mind that MGS3:HD does not include all the additional features that were included in MGS3:S, which was an expanded re-release of MGS3 (the original version of the game). In the video above, the visuals of MGS3:MC on the Switch are being compared to those of MGS3:HD on the PS3, and given that MGS3:MC is a port of MGS3:HD, they should look fairly similar, and they do. The only notable difference between the two games is that MGS3:MC on the Switch runs at 30 frames per second, whereas MGS3:HD on the PS3 runs at 60 FPS. The reason why MGS3:MC only runs at 30 FPS on the Switch instead of running at 60 FPS, like it does on all the other platforms that the game will be released on, seems to be because of hardware limitations related to the Switch's architecture, even though in terms of raw processing power the Switch is actually far more powerful than the PS3 is. I hope I have cleared everything up for you now.

@Sincethe80sGaming

11 ай бұрын

lol you sound like a copy paste script from an AI chatbot hahaha@@Aqua_Lus

@Aqua_Lus

11 ай бұрын

@@Sincethe80sGamingReally? That's interesting. Although I can assure you that my previous reply in this thread was definitely not copy and pasted from an AI chatbot. I wrote it all myself.

@bvq330

11 ай бұрын

@@Sincethe80sGamingmaybe actually read the reply? They're telling the truth.

@JustSomeGuy900

11 ай бұрын

​@@Aqua_Lusfirst mistake: Trying to argue with a πet@rd on the Internet

Playing it months ago on the best console Series X. Looked good and 60fps. This collection is pointless. MGS4 remaster or nothing.

I can at least say I like how the switch version does look as washed out.

Looks the same lol 😅

@willardbennett8255

10 ай бұрын

Agree. 👍

This should be running on switch at 60fps this is another lazy port. It's a ps2 game.

@nickramos5614

11 ай бұрын

Lmfao ikr

This is a Joke

The Switch version will have the worst performance of all Master Collection releases, including the PS4.

Nintendo Switch. 😂

@solidaigis

10 ай бұрын

Shit pfp, edgelord

Man Konami really is the worst gaming company ever...

Ps3 looks better 😅

PS3 Is better

Naaaa your video have a very bad quality