It would be nice if you could include the interview date on these videos. I'm guessing this was recorded quite a while ago.

@oliviamaynard9372

7 ай бұрын

Agree. This was before LHC turned on. That was a while ago.

@DanBetta

7 ай бұрын

All these videos are reruns. They are manipulating the “release” times to make them pop up over and over.

@rockets4kids

7 ай бұрын

@@DanBetta Yeah, I know that, and for many of them it doesn't really make a difference, but there have been so many dark matter experiments with a null result in the past 15 years that opinions on the subject are beginning to change. It is a disservice to the interviewee not to make the date of recording clear.

@marcv2648

7 ай бұрын

Especially since what he’s saying has turned out to be so wrong.

Always enjoy listening to Tegmark.

My favorite interviews are of Dr. Tegmark.

@michaeltrower741

7 ай бұрын

Mine too

It simply isn't easy to be human in a universe where one is blind to 80% of what is out there. It is somewhat exciting to think there is so much to discover. Whatever we may think it is from our current perspective, it is quite likely we are wrong.

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

Sure, right now we have observations of this effect, and lots of ideas about what could be behind it. By definition at most one of those can be right.

@mickeybrumfield764

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 The reality we find ourselves in continues to be exciting and amazing.

@shawns0762

7 ай бұрын

There is an elephant in the room explanation for "dark matter". Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. General Relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. It can be shown mathematically that our own galactic center is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. Or more precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies, the "missing mass" is dilated mass. According to Einstein's math, there would be no dilation in galaxies with very, very low mass because they do not have enough mass in their centers to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 5 very, very low mass galaxies to show no signs of dark matter

Max

I just love Tegmark.

Please keep enlightening us. thank you.

Another good one, as usual. Small thing, also as usual. I guess it will be easy to add simple info: when was this was recorded? Keep up the good work!

👍👍Awesome interview/discussion - thanks-great job.

We don’t really understand the nature of gravity at the fundamental level. Maybe it behaves differently at the galactic scale just like it behaves differently on the subatomic level.

Yay! A new question.

This was excellent. Layman friendly but detailed.

Afterall every scientist cant deny he need his eyes..cant experience all beauty & wonders without eyes..can you put your trust on blind scientist & philosopher..what a miracles purpose of an eyes..thank god for my great eyes

5:40… is there a place we can view these “dark matter” maps?

Time is fascinating. I worked the subway stations for nearly 10 years. From one end of the city to the other. Every so often I would notice the city would be saying that, "Today just flew by" or "The day was just dragging along." How can an ENTIRE CITY, with NO INTERACTION with each other, until they used the subway, complain about the same time paradox unless it was effected by it? Maybe a time distorted bubble the earth passes through in its revolution around the sun. Maybe random waves of time distortion hitting the earth? Maybe they're given off by the sun. Maybe they're from outside our Terran system and reach us in intervals. ???? 🎶Ti-i-i-ime, is on my side. Yes, it is!🎶 If you can think of a better way to do a blind survey - of an entire city - in that small window of opportunity, well then, I'm all in. Until then, I invite you to spend a couple years in the subways. Between 2pm -10pm and you'll see for yourself. Just listen as an entire city gets off of work and gets out of school. You'll see it's more than a, "coincidence of circumstances." ;-P

I need help with my new years resolution. I've figured out how to change the stars. My idea for changing the stars includes Orion and Pleiades (Subaru). I figure it's time to put something up there that's relevant to us, don't you think? Take Orion's belt and Betelgeuse becomes the head with a baseball hat. Below the belt are two legs bending at the knee. The feet aligning perfectly under the bent knees. The 3 stars of Orion's belt align perfectly as the 3 fat belt loops on a baseball uniform. The spear pointing at "Subaru" is the bat being swung and "Pleiades" is the baseball flying away after being hit. Put it all together and you get, "THE ALL-STAR." In my case, I see a left-handed batter and I imagine a "7" on the jersey. Which makes him, "Mickey." (As it should be ;-) But you can put any number you want, making, "THE ALL-STAR," any player you want. It'd be wrong of me to not, at least, try. This is me, trying. Pass it on, please and thank you. Don't worry, where I come from, crazy is a compliment. ;-P

It's great that we have these theories. Very strange something so elusive can have such a huge impact. That must mean 1. If it is small there must be so much of it, or 2. It is much heavier. Assuming its a particle. Must need a way to home in on the energy much like what was done with the Higgs.

@jeremymanson1781

7 ай бұрын

Or it might partly be something we don't understand about gravity

So maybe 4 additional numbers are needed. 3 for cosmology and one for unique

I think a lot of people that understand Einstein don't understand this. His equation was a loop hole in explaining momentum but not why it exists. In a static Universe the why wouldn't matter as far as a human is concerned. Space seems to act like it could be dimensionless just as much as it could retain multiple dimensions. You often hear about theories and properties of the latter but rarely is there precedence in how it could possible come to a rest or a base for a new timeline. Which would be a massive point overlooked considering all the talk about infinite quantities in the 1st place.

If the calculations of dark matter are so precise.. do we really want to create more of it in a laboratory setting such as with the particle accelerator? I mean what if they don't like that? Whatever they are?👽

6:16 how nany more unknowns are there... before the formation of any theory, all such factors must be at least identified...

@S3RAVA3LM

7 ай бұрын

What are you looking for? Greek metaphysics go very deep into it already. They discuss in detail the hypostasis, synthesis, and their hypothesis. Please don't wait for the Max's out there or Lawrence Crouse and Alan guth's out there to man up. All their lives, they've never been indoctrinated with real Intellect, Reason, dialectic, retroduction, apophasis. They only know what circulates in their circles. Don't wait for them. Plotinus enneads Periphyseon by Eriugena, translated by John o'meara Pythagoras influenced Touches of sweet harmony, and lore & science in ancient pythagoreanism. Iamblichus Proclus Meister Eckhart complete works Tesla Honre Poincare Steinmetz Maxwell

@r2c3

7 ай бұрын

@@S3RAVA3LM hello S3R... there's much wisdom in your sources as there's additional space to expand/build upon... no one came into this world and figured it all out alone, though... we need a place to start and sources/resources to learn from, during our journey, the same as we need other valued perspectives from other contemporary seekers... no one is perfect, but at the same time, we all have little bits of something to contribute when part of a social structure... you'd say that's a weakness, but isn't that the reality, we're all weak without forging our understanding with both hot and cold simultaneously... sometimes it feels like walking in a dense fog, unable to make out the way, and to find the right path you have join hands and be part of a colon... all social structure have their own strengths/benefits as they do their weaknesses/vulnerabilities and that also projects our true nature as incomplete and flawed beings who try to make the most out of what's in front of us... the truth is that we're all dependent on eachother and we have to make sure that we select the bonds that make our colon stronger... as always, a pleasure S3R...

Max has been a great interpreter between me a dummy and what discoveries these physicist are discovering! Hope he takes care of his health! Mental and physical! Looks like there has been alot of dark matter coalescing around his mid section! Thanks Closer to Truth and of course Max Tegmark! 🙏✌🙃

@Mr.Anders0n_

6 ай бұрын

It's typical of humans to accret dark matter around the centre as they age

For me the clue is with vacuum energy, black holes, hawking radiation and anti matter gravity with 'annihilation shielding'. Where vacuum energy simply vanishes into nothing and 'assumed' gets destroyed, rather than converted into something beyond our observation and thus conserving energy/time. Hawking radiation working on the priniciple that the anti particle must still exist when crossing the time 'standstill' point, where going from positive time to standstill would imply going further across that event horizon would flip time. ie. rather than switching polarity/ inverting or turning inside out in a way, as its time value inverts. ie conservation of energy is equivalent of conservation of time, by creating anti matter within negative time. In which case black holes would not necessarily evaporate ...but expand as it swallow more material across its boundary. The paradox of the missing matter vs anti matter is explained as.....its not missing, but merely unobservable, outside of our time frame, like dark matter. This can only happen with the notion of negative time being unobservable, yet still unified by gravity across opposing time domains. Of course, an equal and opposite force does not require negative time is a perfect mirror, any more than mass x force must balance on ether side of an equation. The mass and force can be different on either side, as long as the equation holds true.

4:16 MT: ... it's seems to be some kind of stuff that indeed does not interact through the electromagnetic force cuz then we would see it doesn't interact through the strpmg force cuz then it would sticl on us and not just go right through us the way it right it's very it's quite likely that it interacts with a so-called weak force though which is exactly the same kind of force which neutrinos interact with us through and neutrinos are very shy particles if a nutrino particles comes from the sun and hits me it goes through the earth and comes out on the other side but nonetheless people have able to catch them right as they flew through sufficiently large detector and uh I think we're right on the verge to get the kind of sensi 5:01 ... 6:50 ... how about the six for cosmology what are they and what do they feel like 6:55 MT: ... each number just tells us about how much there is of something where we don't know the origin so to me the most exciting future challenge for cosmology is going to be to get better measurements so that we can transform just this numerical understanding to a deeper understanding and understand what's the underlying physics what is the dark matter what is the dark energy what really happened early on (but it's going to be impossible to really understand the universe unless dark matter is a critical part of the equation ) 7:44 there is absolutely no way you would be able to produce the universe we see around us without some sort of extra stuff we still don't know for sure if it's a new particle or maybe some complicated modification to gravity or some new field but there's something new needed ( I AM WHO I AM ) the simplest explanation my mind right now is new particle but the key thing is we have these experiments they're on the verge 8:07 of happening right so there's never been as exciting a time to think about dark matter because I wouldn't be surprised if 10 years from now we know what it is and that's going to be something to really look forward to.

There's a problem: Persons of today think the ancients were silly and inferior to modern man. I've been advocating the 'Upanishads' and a little twirp here tryed to disrespect not only me but the substance that such a realization is. I guess little punks of today think by 'going along' with the consensus makes them think that they're part of the group. Let's make one thing very cleaer: the ancients were many things, and stupid isn't one of them.

@misterhill5598

7 ай бұрын

Well, one of the ancient were foolish enough to popularise the concept of the Atom. That lead many future generations down the wrong path to study the universe.

@quantumkath

7 ай бұрын

Hello @S3RAVA3LM. I don't think anyone is saying the ancients were stupid. I believe they set the foundation for modern science and philosophy to build on ❣️ In fact, some of those ideas still hold today.

Is this a repost? I remember the ball.

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

It's a clip from a longer form interview. They post clips like this on specific topics, often in a series on that topic over a few weeks or months. You've probably either seen the full interview before, or another clip from the save interview they've posted where they discussed a different topic.

So we didnt find dark matter in LHC. What does that mean?

@rockets4kids

7 ай бұрын

It wasn't just the LHC that hasn't found any dark matter particles. There have been plenty of other experiments which have failed to find dark matter particles as well.

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

The LHC wasn't built particularly to find dark matter. It's job was to find the Higgs Boson, which it did. As a side bonus it did exclude a class of dark matter theories, but that was expected.

@rockets4kids

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 That's not entirely true either. The LHC was intended as a general purpose tool, finding the Higgs was only one of its design goals. A significant number of people were expecting the LHC to also find evidence of super-symmetry, and a null result there was perhaps the most interesting discovery.

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

@@rockets4kids Sure, build a big collider and physicists will find uses for it, but I don't think dark matter was ever a big focus.

@rockets4kids

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 Go back 15 years and look at the number of people who were expecting dark matter to be a result of super-symmetry, and the number of people who were expecting to see hints of super-symmetry from the LHC.

Quite + of him... they do know about 2 negatives. I would say we are wrapped in a membrane intereaction s that s intemporal. But next to the electron, boson, red matter , light etc. Or vaccum decay is the intereaction energy. Dark energy !? Went past, the only negative conditional break

Rotational Speed of Solar System around the Galaxy/Black Hole

just thought of this today. if matter get's sucked into a black hole where does it go? my theory : it becomes dark matter.

Could dark matter be the missing antimatter? What if the antimatter had a difference in gravity somhow and formed black holes?

@quantumkath

7 ай бұрын

Dark matter could not be the missing antimatter because matter and antimatter would annihilate each other (+/-). This unanswered question of why our universe has more (visible) matter is related to broken symmetry at the Big Bang. Positrons, the antimatter of electrons, have the same mass (and 1/2 spin) as the electron. Positrons and electrons are affected equally in a gravitational field.

@oliviamaynard9372

7 ай бұрын

@@quantumkath well they must be different somehow cause they are here though

@quantumkath

7 ай бұрын

Yeah. I see what you mean.

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

@@oliviamaynard9372 There was a recent experiment that showed that antimatter is affected by gravity in the same way as matter. On black holes, we can observe conventional matter being absorbed by it, and the radiation emitted by it as it's torn apart close to the event horizon, so we know black holes are formed from masses of conventional matter.

Dark Matter is said to have no mass but has gravitational effects. Gravitational waves with interference might explain this.

I wonder how old this interview is? I see so much today now doubting the existence of dark matter.

@David.C.Velasquez

7 ай бұрын

Most of these segments are taken from longer form interviews, done anywhere from 6 to 14 years ago for the PBS aired series.

@SaltyDraws

7 ай бұрын

@@David.C.Velasquez odd they would post this now while the doubts now are large

🌴😎💯

If the sun above moves, you on earth close to the waters must move......is this right?

This is an old video ... I have dark matter building up right now because of the space violation caused by the content and the time for it to move into my dark matter vacuum box that Im gonna label "question mark" aka Herman's suspicion and Del Lusion 🧐. 5:03 oyyy yes neutrinos..sneaky things, do they catch a ride on spinners to mirror similar work of the nucleic acid in the body? Lol wouldn't that be weird...Free Will of the nutrino. It goes where it most wants to thrive and glow?? 🤔 idk.

Without dark matter there would not be life and a cyclic universe could not be.

The idea of a ‘singularity’ is ridiculous IMO. Do most physicists agree that black holes are simply super dense spheres of mass not unlike neutron stars whose neutrons are touching neutrons with no apparent motion, black holes have another level of gravity and density that has the quarks and gluons pressed together with no remaining apparent motion or vibrations at all that have become dense enough that their event horizon diameter exceeds the sphere’s diameter, going black from our view? I think Einstein's wrong, that time is constant and that dark matter is the limiting factor to the speed of light. I think it’s not 'space-time' bending but rather gravitational and dark matter density variations.

(27÷5)=5.2 5/2

I wouldn’t be surprised if in 10 years time we know it doesn’t exist!!

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

Sure, and that's fine. What's important is we work out an explanation for the observations, whatever that turns out to be. As Max says at the end of the interview, we should keep our minds open to whatever explanation we find.

@georg917

7 ай бұрын

agreed

Max, Max, Max,...stop confusing me.

Could it not just be the case that the law of gravity is wrong on the very large scale of galaxies and beyond.

Exclusion Zones… 100%

Existence beyond the physical is a forbidden knowledge, this is why it has to be dark to be invisible to your limited physical senses... ...soon, when your soul left your body at death, you will realize that the Spiritual World of God is actually not dark but full of light... however, if you have no faith in God, you won't see this loving light but, instead, total darkness in a state of cold emptiness (hell) - an absence of God..

Dark Matter and Dark Energy 🤔and Quantum Mechanics.

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

To be fair, that last one has given us a crapton(*) of useful technology. (*) That's the metric crapton, of course.

As above so below..Atoms mimic our solar system😎

My idea so I get to name it! What I mean is, no one has claimed it so I'm officially calling, "Dibs." Voyager 1 is now in the, "Milky Way's interstellar time" or "Mikey's Time." "V-ger's" message has sped up now that it's outside our Sun's, "Time Bubble," or, "Terran Time." It will be faster, still, when "V-ger" sends a message from beyond the Milky Way's time bubble. Then there's Outside the Local Group time bubble. So on and so on until we get outside any influence and into the, "True Interstellar Time Standard." Or, "T.I..." ;-P Now that "V-ger" is outside our Sun's reach, in interstellar space, it's now in the Milky Way's faster moving, Interstellar Time or "Mikey's Time." This can be proven by turning off everything except its clock and transmitter. Have "V-ger" read time for as long as possible. They WILL show the flow of time speeds up the further away you get from any celestial bodies. Until you reach the Milky Way's time standard or "Mikey's Time." •Our sun's time bubble: "Terran Time" we know and have measured. In a lifetime, our head is one second younger than our feet. •Milky Way's time bubble or "Mikey's Time." The rate/flow of TIME outside any influence but within the Milky Way: We just got there and are still figuring what the difference is. Wild guess I'd say time will increase in speed, now and until V-ger is outside the Ort cloud. •Local Group's time bubble or the rate/flow of time outside of any influence but within the Local Group: Name still open and unknown. Wild guess .08 P-22% to a couple seconds faster, maybe. Used just for reference. •Outside any influence in the, "True Interstellar Time Standard." (or T.I...) ;-P This name is NOT up for grabs. The rate/flow of time is fastest here. (Time flows fastest here so it's best to use a motor boat and hold tight. Always applies when you're in T.I....) ;-P A minute is a minute in all. It's the rate/flow I'm talking about. Heck, rivers of time flowing differently might explain dark energy and dark matter. The Milky Way's Interstellar Time Standard will be known as, "Mikey's Time." Pass it on, please and thank you!

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

We're still in communication with Voyager's computer. If it's clock was running at a different rate, or it's speed of oepration changed, we'd have noticed it already. Also there are physical processes such as photon emission, absorption, orbital periods, etc out at remote galaxies that would behave differently in observable ways if time out there was running at different rates. BTW due to the expansion of the universe phenomena occurring at galaxies near the edge of observational range appear to occur 5 times slower than they do here. Time didn't actually run any slower for those galaxies, it's just due to the stretching of space making the signals appear to be slowed down. This was predicted about 50 years ago using relativity and was recently confirmed to high accuracy.

@michaelccopelandsr7120

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 So what? Clocks in orbit run faster than clocks at sea level. We know time can be manipulated. All I'm saying is the further away from anything the faster time IS. You have a gravitational pull like a galaxy and you're going to get slower moving time in their, "bubble". Get next to an extreme gravitational pull like a black hole and time moves relatively slower and slower the closer you get.

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

@@michaelccopelandsr7120 That's just relativity. We already take that into account. I thought you were proposing something new.

@michaelccopelandsr7120

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 Never said it was new. I said it hadn't been claimed, yet.

@user-ri6rn7ti5h

6 ай бұрын

(27÷5)=5.2

26 + 6 = 32 Parameters

They have been saying they are "on the verge" of having life make itself for years too.

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

Theists have been saying 'science can't explain X' for hundreds of years, and for hundreds of years we've been knocking out complete, thorough explanations one after the other. It took nature a few hundred millions years, and there's almost no evidence left of how it did it, so I think it might take us a while but we're getting there. The work on autocatalytic sets is very promising. It's easy to throw out the challenge, and easy to drop the subject and pretend it doesn't matter when an explanation is discovered. Will you bet your commitment to theism that we won't come up with a complete natural explanation of how life could emerge in your lifetime?

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

7 ай бұрын

*"They have been saying they are "on the verge" of having life make itself for years too."* ... The universal catch phrase for science is, *_"Science is closer than ever to solving (fill in the blank)!"_* which is a presuppositional statement (a fallacy). Scientists could spend a millennium moving in the wrong direction thinking all along that they're "closer than ever." And when I point this out to science worshipers, they argue that eliminating failed theories is technically science "moving closer" to solving the mystery. That, of course, precludes the fact that they could spend countless millennia exploring a bunch of new "failed theories."

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC Yet somehow, we keep on discovering and explaining stuff all the time, and using those discoveries to build the modern world around your ears.

@user-gk9lg5sp4y

7 ай бұрын

​@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC With your obvious disdain for science, do you find it ironic that you use a device created by engineers using science to communicate, on a massive scale, said disain?

@JungleJargon

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 You have a lot of wishful thinking. You can falsify God if you could show matter or energy making and directing themselves. Then your unscientific belief in magic would replace God.

they reveal that general relativity is wrong

@user-ri6rn7ti5h

6 ай бұрын

It would go more even into it at (27÷9)=3 3%

Dark matter/energy reveals the spiritual side of God's universe, God didn't equip man to interact with it and the material we're made of can't interact with it either......

5.2 rime more dark matter

The fact is that the formulae we use for calculating the motion of celestial bodies (both, Newtonian and Einsteinian) fail to account for 95% of the observable motion. It is the poverty of their imagination and lack of courage to dare dumping the obviously disproved formulae and search for more approriate method for describing natural phenomena, that has compelled scientists to invent and waste billions (LHC, JWST, etc.) in the search for nonexisting DM and DE. Scientists would certainly find something to justify the search and continue the insane process further eternally, unless they (we rather, as I also believed in, learnt and intensely followed science throughout my life) realize our folly at least now and change course to target discovering the mathematical model of how particle interactions inside the earth develop PLANTS on its own surface, to then deliver and sustain beings there. Remember, PLANTS remain the only entity in the entire known universe that sustains 100% of all life in it, while the most fundamental describers of natural phenomena of current science (the periodic table and both the standard models, particle physical and cosmic) totally ignore their presence in the universe. Science predicts (and retrodicts) the origin and end of the entire universe with absolute certainty, without even mentioning a single word about them, while not being able to survive even s single second wothout the air and food from them.

Max! Recalibrate your measures of time and distance. Invisible matter has no effect on anything and the vacuum of space is from existing matter in black holes that contract and absorb space and stops time.

@user-gk9lg5sp4y

7 ай бұрын

Those are definitely words

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

@@user-gk9lg5sp4y To be fair there is some grammar in there too.

@user-gk9lg5sp4y

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 😁

Arghhhhhhhhhhh, Mr Rob. I like the way you keep surprising me with your super brilliance. I am not a republican or democrat, yet I am pro Israel, the Western hemisphere, and Russia and allies. Max, why are you trying to throw me far from what i primarily know to be true. I totally understand.

You can only catch it unawares when you move - it is much way too intelligent for humans to comprehend, especially when they are really low spirited.

They reveal the fact that physicists will believe anything to keep a theory alive

@jeremymanson1781

7 ай бұрын

If you listened you would know that they are saying THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS.

"What Do Black Holes and Dark Matter Reveal". ------------ It reeveals the scientific ignorance based on gravitational assumptions et all.

Nice fairy tales about dark matter and very dark holes. However I like stories about flying carpets more.

Ask an astrophysicists why do they think dark matter exists? They will tell you it's because stars extremely far away from the barycenter of galaxies orbit at tremendous velocities where the laws of motion, and theory of gravity can't explain. So they insert a wildcard variable that can't be measured directly to explain what the current laws and theories cannot. And then they put it in a tight bundle called the Lambda Cold Dark Matter model or LCDM model. Even though they still cannot explain the rapid motion of stars in galaxies they claim they've figured it out enough to put it all into a model that doesn't explain or predict anything. I asked an astrophysicist, did their LCDM model predict telescopes would discover old massive, fully formed into spirals galaxies, brighter than they should be, more than 20 times larger than our own galaxy but further than 13 billion light years away? Nope. That's not what the model predicted. Even Einstein's relativity appears to be wrong, his look back time predicted young stars and galaxies, not old ones that are fully formed. They cannot see dark matter. They measure the velocity of a star which they can't explain, then they change their equations. This simply means the model and theories are wrong and can't be confirmed after taking measurements. It doesn't mean something they can't see or measure somehow exists. The crazy thing is dark matter doesn't affect the motion of planets and moons in our solar system. It only appears to affect the motion of the sun as it orbits the galaxy center some 450,000 mi/h too fast. It doesn't appear to affect the motion of the S type stars orbiting close to the black hole but it affects our sun? It doesn't seem to affect the stars in young diffuse galaxies either. So dark matter appears to be selective on what it does and does not affect. Why is that if it's supposed to be everywhere? I explained all the problems with dark matter in the book I published 5-24-2022 titled DARK MATTER: What's Wrong With General Relativity? I came up with a single solution for all the observations, including the unexplained lensing effect occurring to light astrophysicists have pinned on dark matter. My next book will be called DARK MATTER IS DEAD: Mystery Solved by Ron Kemp. I'm still working on it. I'm trying to decide, do I turn it into a series of 5 books, or just one having almost 600 pages?

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

>"So they insert a wildcard variable that can't be measured directly to explain what the current laws and theories cannot. " That's one approach, as Max explained in the last 30 seconds of the interview there are multiple possible explanations. They're working on methods to identify the best theory. That's how science works. >"Even Einstein's relativity appears to be wrong, his look back time predicted young stars and galaxies, not old ones that are fully formed." I see part of your confusion. Relativity doesn't say anything about how long it takes for Galaxies to form, that's a separate issue. I see this confusion a lot online, the fact that galaxies formed earlier than expected is a problem for our theories of galaxy formation, which we knew were probably wrong anyway. It has nothing to do with the reasons we have for predicting the age of the universe. >"The crazy thing is dark matter doesn't affect the motion of planets and moons in our solar system." You wrote a book about this, and you don't know why that's the case? Wow. How to throw away a lot of money talking about something where you don't even know what the claims are you're arguing against.

@ronaldkemp3952

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 Please, explain when did astrophysicists measure dark matter or dark energy affecting the orbit and motion of the planets and moons in our solar system. Good luck with that.

@ronaldkemp3952

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 And, the predictions made by the cosmological model was based on the telescope's ability to look back in time per relativity. It has nothing to do with how fast galaxies formed in the early universe if the telescope can't find an early universe. Do you understand why astrophysicists called the massive distant galaxies containing old red giant stars, The Impossible Early Galaxy Paradox?

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

@@ronaldkemp3952 It doesn't. If Dark Matter is a particle, it's weakly interacting with matter, so it doesn't clump together with it or form into dense clouds due to effects like friction. As a result it behaves more in line with fluid dynamics, and forms loosely bound blobs around galaxies. This can be modelled accurately using fluid dynamics simulations, with results which closely match observations.

@ronaldkemp3952

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 the thing is, I published the first paperback book September 27, 2021. That was almost 3 months before the JWST was launched. On page 48 I wrote quote, "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light years away." I accurately predicted the old massive galaxies in the distant universe before the JWST was even launched. I came up with the prediction after finding errors in the equations of relativity back in 2004. It took me till 2021 to write and publish the first book and I beat the deadline of the telescopes launch by 3 months. I knew why the theories and cosmological model was wrong and fixed them a long time ago. I tried explaining to NASA employees the problems with their equations and how to fix them but they ignored me. They sparked me to write and publish the books years later. I not only know why the galaxies are old and massive but explained exactly why they would be so massive and old when they were supposed to be young and dim. I predicted the paradox before they even knew how their theories and model of the universe would discover the paradox. Go me. There I go, boasting again. Sorry I sometimes get carried away in thought. While they are trying to come up with a reason for the old massive galaxies after the fact, some even denying they exist, cognitive dissonance, I already solved the paradox before the JWST was launched. I even was able to explain why satellite galaxies in the Milky Way some 50,000 light years away of the galaxy's central mass orbit more than a million miles per hour and yet can't reach an escape velocity. Dark matter can't explain it.

Isn't interesting how we can map the entire universe, sample and model the neo-natal background radiation from the Big Bang, figure out (and eventually capture) dark matter...and yet we cannot find ONE signal, of any kind, from an alien source. Welcome to The Great Simulation, my fellow lab rats.

@misterhill5598

7 ай бұрын

We are the cells of a powerful giant being, who lives inside a bubble. There is no alien where we live.

nothing because neither of them actually exist.

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

That's possible and Max covered this at the end of the universe, but the fact is we have these observations and it would be good to find out what is causing them.

@xlilxillx

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 gravitational lensing is just plasma red-shift. dark matter simply doesn't exist. it's a manifestation of the fundamental misunderstanding of physics. this is all explained and proved by plasma cosmology using actual laboratory evidence, not mathematical tricks and speculation built on speculation.

@simonhibbs887

7 ай бұрын

@@xlilxillx Pretty much all the phenomena plasma cosmology claimed to explain have been better explained by observations since. Meanwhile almost all of the novel predictions of plasma cosmology have failed to turn up, meanwhile necessary side effects of it's explanations such as dramatically higher X-ray and Gamma-ray emissions also just aren't there. It might have made some sense back in the 80s, but nowadays it's completely ruled out by lack of positive evidence, adn the presence of negative evidence.

@xlilxillx

7 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 idk what reality you’re living in but that’s the exact opposite of the truth. Plasma cosmology has a very long list of confirmed predictions while the standard model has a very long list of failures.

All my addiction recovery journey is documented on social media for everyone to see the truth of what happened, happens and would happen. I am a psychologist and I have discovered the nature of God. The greatest knowledge of all time is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. The atheist logical fallacy would test your intelligence and honesty and the error in reasoning is easy to understand being honest and impossible lying to oneself. To end all the wars in the world and atheism and religion the discovery that atheism is a logical fallacy has to be news. You understood what I said if you understand what I expect from you if something happens to me and I die. I am tired and I need to rest in peace. Am I asking much or too much? I hope for God's sake to be understood. Emergency. Lives were lost while I talked.

Oh no here we ago again!😂 Physicists talking about so called dark matter or dark energy. Basically, total nonsense but looks nice in certain journals with some fancy nonsense maths! Look more to Echart Tolle than to modern physics for an understanding of reality!

@jeremymanson1781

7 ай бұрын

What authority do you have to be so certain that effects we can see and measure are a figment of our imagination?

@stuford

7 ай бұрын

@@jeremymanson1781 So how do we see dark matter then? And what do you mean by authority. Do I need authority to express an opinion?

@tcuisix

7 ай бұрын

Ekhart Tolle? are you being serious?

@jeremymanson1781

7 ай бұрын

@@stuford on a specialist subject? Definitely!!! For example: I know nothing about brain surgery - do you really want to know my 'opinion' on what to do in the operating theatre?

@Bill..N

7 ай бұрын

Honestly, friend and no personal offense intended, BUT that comment was the most comically absurd ideas I have heard all month.. Ribbon worthy.

Theory after theory . . They have no fucken clue 😂 but yea keep giving us more funding . .