I don't understand how anyone discussing this subject never brings up Moses Farrow's written defense of Woody Allen and Moses' own claims of long-term childhood physical and mental abuse by Mia Farrow. Moses lived this and he writes from his own experience. He completely changed my perceptions of the accusations against Woody. Women like Mia know exactly what they are doing when they accuse their husband or partner of child abuse. They understand how powerful of a weapon it is.

@Userick10

Ай бұрын

Every person who’s convinced Woody is guilty needs to read it. If anything, it’s Mia who should be shunned by Hollywood and the public.

@bezzarguy

Ай бұрын

And he’s a licensed therapist too.

@muziktrkr

Ай бұрын

The family is truly a divided one, and nothing good came from making it public.

@calholli

Ай бұрын

I don't care if there was no abuz3 .. he married his daughter in-law. Her name is Soon-Yi.. Mia Farrow adopted her at 10 years old.. While dating Woody Allen.. (they dated for 12 years). So he knew this little girl since she was 10 years old and was a father figure to her..... Then Married her when she was 27. If you don't think that's mess3d up, then you're the only one. Just ask any AI platform; it's common knowledge.

@SLAYERSWINE1

Ай бұрын

​@@calholliNot messed up. Not against the law. They are still married. How about stop being a #CannotUnderstandNormalThinking douchebag?

Mia has one child who is always overlooked in this situation. Her son Moses. He stated that he was in the living room when his mother was coaching Dylan and Ronan on their statements.

@nilousettimio8730

Ай бұрын

Go ahead and make excuses for the PEDO!! Shame on you

@santiagosss

26 күн бұрын

mosesfarrow.blogspot.com/2018/05/a-son-speaks-out-by-moses-farrow.html?m=1

The documentary made me think all wasn 't well in the Farrow household. In the scene celebrating the little girl's birthday, Mia Farrow is very animated as you'd expec,t lighting candles, over-emphasized facial expressions (as you'd expect for a child's birthday celebration), singing the birthday song, etc., but as the camera moves across the room there are 3 Asian girls standing at the sink washing dishes. They are not included in the party, they show no reaction to the party, they never even look over at the table where everyone is singing happy birthday. Mia acts like they don't exist as well--not a word or a glance in their direction. Even if these girls were not her adopted daughters, that they are treated with such disregard does not bode well for anyone in the Farrow family.

@justgivemethetruth

25 күн бұрын

3 of her adopted daughters are dead of suicide. She adopted slaves. Her whole family is toxic.

I totally agree with Maher on this matter. Each and every point. What High School student did he have a relationship with? I never heard about that. I'll grant the Woody Allen/Soon-Yi relationship has a creepy appearance but he did nothing illegal or technically wrong. He was never married to Mia Farrow. hell, they didn't even live together. They had a professional and boyfriend/girlfriend relationship. And Allen did nothing with Soon-Yi until she was of age. He was exonerated twice on the charges that were brought by Mia Farrow and the child in question who had "repressed memories" come out in some new age therapy. If Allen was a child molester dozens of women would be coming out of the woodwork suing him and blaming him. Even if it wasn't true, let's face it, he's world famous and rich so it would have happened. And child molesters don't molest *ONE* single child all of a sudden at retirement age and then never again. One and done. It starts early and goes on for years. Look at Michael Jackson,. Gary Glitter, R. Kelly, Ian Watkins, etc. Of course, I don't really know anything for a fact but everything about it simply don't fit the profile

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

Watch the documentary. Allen dated a 16 year old, sexually abused Soon Yi when she was 17 and definitely molested Dylan. Woody was definitely a father figure to Soon Yi and he manipulated that relationship. He is total scum

@JC19676

Ай бұрын

The high school girl is named Stacey Nelkin. They were involved sexually when she was 17 and Allen was 42. In New York State,someone in their 40s couldn't have sex with someone under 21. That is statutory rape in New York State. He started his relationship with Soon Yi when she was that age. Another illegal act. He meet the model Christina Engelhardt when she was 16. He was having a sexual relationship with her when she was 17 and Allen was 41.

@danielartist123

Ай бұрын

Katie is thinking about the film Manhattan!

@tedsperos1620

Ай бұрын

@@danielartist123 Maybe. Maybe so.

@mcouzijn

Ай бұрын

@@danielartist123 Apparently unable to distinguish fact from fiction.

The high school student Allen dated was actress Stacie Nelkin. Woody used their relationship as the basis for his relationship with Mariel Hemingway in "Manhattan" where his character was 42 and hers was 17.

@etherspin

16 күн бұрын

I regard that as one level of creep behaviour but VERY different level and very different nature to actual child abusers

Mia Farrow certainly had her own issues. The documentary was absolutely her story no one else’s and she seemed a little deranged actually

There is something wrong with Mia Farrow who left both her natural born children in England and took Soonyi to the states, and adopted over and over and over ... kids who have since offed themselves and she continues to put her daughter Dylan up for scrutiny, over and over and over.

I am always shocked when I agree with Bill on anything … but on this I 100 % agree …

My biggest issue with that documentary is the implication that the two agencies Investigating the case were corrupt. if that’s true, wouldn’t that be much bigger story than an allegation against one man? Why not investigate these agencies more? I know the answer. There’s nothing to investigate.

Just because someone is found not guilty, doesn’t make them innocent. (Cough cough OJ)

@bryanismyname7583

Ай бұрын

The prosecution has the burden of proof, not the defense. In this country, you are "innocent until proven guilty," meaning the accusers (the prosecution) has to make its case beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal court in order to convict. In Woody Allen's case, the charges were dismissed for lack of evidence, and it was said that video testimony was likely coached by Mia.

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

Well OJ was found responsible in civil court. Why doesn't Dylan take the case to civil court? (Hint, hint, she would lose).

@calholli

Ай бұрын

Her name is Soon-Yi.. Mia Farrow adopted her at 10 years old.. While dating Woody Allen.. (they dated for 12 years). So he knew this little girl since she was 10 years old and was a father figure to her..... Then Married her when she was 27. If you don't think that's mess3d up, then you're the only one. Just ask any AI platform; it's common knowledge.

@yogione

Ай бұрын

@@calholli What isn't common knowledge, is that Soon Yi was four years older than what was presented on her birth certificate.

@johndecker2987

Ай бұрын

OJ was arrested but won at trial.

It's not that hard to figure out. The fact is that almost every case when a woman accuses a man of assaulting a child, it's during divorce and breakups. It's never the reason they broke up. Yet, somehow magically men just become deranged and start attacking (frequently their own) children during breakups just because that's what men are. This all happened to me too. It was infuriating and the sadness is that the abuse is in the accusation and yet no one is going around attacking Mia Farrow as someone who may be lying and abusing her children while saying "we just don't know" about a guy who was exonerated and has been in a stable relationship since then.

@Ausgar-yc1yl

Ай бұрын

Woody was never married to Mia.

@myronschabe

Ай бұрын

Yeah, I ABSOLUTELY JUST DON'T BUY IT! Women are not vindictive in this way...there is just no way family members would be in cahoots to be vindictive against a 'father'. Also, I just heard about the overturn of the Harvey Weinstein case....folks we all have to stop and take a breather...society has to start giving women the benefit of the doubt, as opposed to the other way around....look at the dynamics of the sexual act...men are physically stronger than women...I won't even go into the psychological dimensions of the abuse of power...what we really should be looking at is what is going on under the covers that wants to exonerate men of this kind of abuse...it happens ALL THE TIME...why is there so much complicitness?????

@surfwriter8461

Ай бұрын

That's totally false and insulting to victims. It's true that some women assert false allegations about child abuse against a husband they want to prevent securing rights with children, but that is a minority of cases. And the vast majority of child abuse accusations in general are not faked. Many never come to light, in fact. Your depiction of this is cruel as well as ignorant and false.

@JRZTXN

Ай бұрын

No one should ever be wrongly accused of abuse in any way whatsoever. However, many women keep things silent from fear of more abuse. Especially a beloved person as Allen. Who was going to believe he would be a monster. This is very complicated within each situation and needs more attention so people can understand that one anecdote isn’t evidence of every situation.

@myronschabe

Ай бұрын

@@JRZTXN Yes, and no one ESPECIALLY CHILDREN should be sexually abused and assaulted...I mean wihich is worse to be sexually abused and assaulted or accused of abusing or assaulting...I would certainly assert the former...why society does not protect the vulnerable more or make attempts at protecting the vulnerable more, is certainly the sign of some very toxic patterning....so all these men and lawyers and whomever else that stick together to hold this kind of thing in place rreally needs to be looked at in society...this current Havery Weinstein, over rule points to this and is just so utterly disgusting....women just don't make shit like this up, they just want to live thier lives. Yes, it is all complicated and every case needs to be taken on a case by case basis but we all need to start to understand the psychological patterning that keeps this kind of stuff from happening because unfortunately it is INCREDIBLY COMMON.

Bill hits the nail on the head. I have studied this case closely and even putting aside the actual investigation and conclusions of professionals, any reasonable person can only conclude that the story just never made sense. I always hated when people would say "I believe you Dylan." Believing someone doesn't make what they say true. I believe her too - meaning it is clear she believes she was molested, but it doesn't mean it happened. Almost certainly it did not.

Firstly innocent till proven guilty. Secondly the notion that WA is a predatory paedophile that only acted on his impulses once in his life is unlikely bordering on ridiculous.

@davidkelsall6164

26 күн бұрын

Yes, yes and yes. Exactly right.

Thank you Bill for defending Woody. As a 37 year career prosecutor, I am certain of his innocence.

@Themanwhocameback2

Ай бұрын

Mia has always been an emotionally disturbed woman.as a 20 year old actress on the hit TV series Peyton Place, she shaved her head during summer hiatus, for no reason at all, and when filming resumed she had to be given a wig. She married Sinatra 50 year old Sinatra when she was 20, 21. She ran away from him and took up with The Beatles, going to India for several months with them. When she got back, she went after another old man, Conductor and composer Andre Previn, and destroyed his marriage. ALL OF WHICH WOULD SEEM TO INDICATE THAT IS SHE WHO, AS A VERY YOUNG GIRL, WENT AFTER OLDER MEN.

Stacey Nelkin was the age of consent, and the movie was from Mia's point of view with no rebuttal. Why would Mia want a child predator to adopt her children? And the title is deceptive, because Allen V Farrow implies a court case, but Woody was never charged with anything.

Ronan Farrow is definitely not his.

@deer105

Ай бұрын

Ronan Sinatra

@steveconn

Ай бұрын

Ronan Celebrity Headhunter lmao

@DJ-bj8ku

Ай бұрын

Sinatra’s daughter said he isn’t Frank’s.

@mrcanarsie

Ай бұрын

Mia used to sleep in bed naked with him

@mcouzijn

Ай бұрын

Now that's great. So you believe that: - Mia LIED to a father about 'his' child; - Mia LIED to her son about who his father is; - Mia LIED in court (perjury!) when she sued Woody for child support $$$$; - Mia only ADMITTED after that *money train* had run out. You know what? I think that a mother who did the things *you believe* she did, is 100% capable of making a FALSE child abuse allegation. Can we agree on that?

Soon Ji and Woody Allen are married. She was 21 and of legal age when Mia got batshit crazy with jealousy after finding nude photos of Soon Ji. Woody Allen never wanted to marry Mia and they didn’t even live together. Soon Ji was not his adopted daughter. Mia simply went crazy with rage and jealousy. Classic case of “Hell has no fury like a woman scorned” Those concocted tales about the 7year old Dylan getting molested only were brought up AFTER Woody and Soon Ji began their relationship and Mia got unceremoniously dumped. She coached that poor little girl and used her to get her revenge against Woody Allen for dumping her. In December 1991 Mia happily allowed Woody Allen to adopt both Moses and Dylan! Then ONE month later Mia found those nude photos of 21 year old Soon Ji, in January 1992! Look at the timing of her subsequent charges of “child molestation!” Those only came up AFTER she was dumped. After Mia found those photos. Then Woody gets cleared by the Yale experts who wrote a report saying they found that no sexual abuse had occurred

@nilousettimio8730

16 күн бұрын

Repulsive

@theghoul9326

12 күн бұрын

Not only did they conclude it didn’t happen, but they also recommended Farrow undergo therapy.

Annie Hall and Take the Money and Run-two best movies.😂

@jim-oq9px

Ай бұрын

the one he was a sperm and shot out,...hahaha too funny

@barbaraschumacher3861

Ай бұрын

I vote for "Small Time Crooks" and "Coup de Chance."

@OMGWTFLOLSMH

Ай бұрын

Annie Hall, Play it Again Sam, Sleeper, Manhattan are my faves.

@doncozz8536

Ай бұрын

Sleeper too.

@BScott7220

Ай бұрын

Annie Hall tied with Crimes & Misdemeanors

katie that was NOT a documentary. Thats the HBO format that did a number on Marilyn Manson as well, Michael Jackson too.. irrespective of guilt, HBO makes hit pieces for ONE side in these disputes

Katie gets it wrong again! I watched the doc. There was no mention of high school except Sun yee

@TommiChong

Ай бұрын

Well she's a part of the hollyweird kiddy toucher crew

@lukabop8558

Ай бұрын

She's referring to the 17 year old that Allan briefly dated, after meeting her on the set of Annie Hall. It was brief, and with the girl's parent's consent, even though 17 is actually the legal age in New York. This was the inspiration for his film Manhattan. The girl herself was always vocal that Allan never abused her, and was always respectful of her.

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

I'm pretty sure she said she was 16. It's a big segment on her Edit: Episode 2, 18 minutes. She said she was 16 when she met Woody. 17 when they got involved. That was Christina not Stacy.

@mcouzijn

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 There is no girl who said she was 16 (which would be illegal). As in: zero. Even Christina 'Babi' Engelhardt claims she was 17 (= above age), and her story is not credible whatsoever.

@bryanismyname7583

Ай бұрын

@@lukabop8558 : the law recently changed to 18, but yes, in 1977 it would have been legal. He was 42 in 1977 when "Annie Hall" was released, so I don't think that's really appropriate but not criminal. At 18 you can go to war, you can vote ... very adult decisions. They aren't children. I know some people like to think of those ages as being so naive and young. And sometimes they are at those ages, but where do we draw the line? Besides that, there's a huge difference between dating a 17 or 18 year old and assaulting a 7 year old. The idea that they are the same thing is just ludicrous.

Anyone can be mad to be evil in a scripted documentary.

The evidence points to Mia Farrow lying and coaching to turn all the kids against Woody. She's a piece of work.

@CaptainTae

Ай бұрын

Did she talk Soon Yi into marrying him?

@steveconn

Ай бұрын

​@@CaptainTae??

@TheMaxKids

Ай бұрын

Thanks for your comment, Woody.

@celestialnubian

Ай бұрын

@@TheMaxKids I'm Buzz Lightyear hoe! 😁

@JosephHowes2003

Ай бұрын

​@@CaptainTaewhy is this abusive? He was never a father figure to her. They got to know each other after she was an adult. It's a consensual relationship between adults so it's their business.

Mia Farrow and Woody Allen were never married; they never even lived together.

Mia farrow coached that girl into believing something that didn’t happen.

@bryanismyname7583

Ай бұрын

This is likely the case. See the film "Indictment: The McMartin Trial" (1995), a powerful film about how a media frenzy and overzealous psychologists can railroad people in the court of public opinion.

@calholli

Ай бұрын

What did happen is Woody raising soon-yi like a father figure.. and then goes on to marry her. I'm literally looking at an image where she's sitting on his lap and she barely looks 6 or 7 years old. You're a s^cko too, for defending this. There are endless photos of the family together in public when she's just a IittIe girI. smh

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

@@calholli There are ZERO photos of Woody and Soon Yi prior to Ronan being born in 1987. In fact, Soon Yi hadn't even been adopted by Mia until she was 7 and Woody and Mia hadn't even met until Soon Yi was 10 so how could a 6 or 7 year old Soon Yi be sitting on his lap?

@calholli

Ай бұрын

@@rl12345 I said she "looks" 6 or 7.. she's a little kid. It's certainly not someone you would marry in a few years.

@davidsheriff9274

Ай бұрын

​@@calholliWoody's relationship with Soon-Yi has nothing to do with the allegations against him by Dylan.

I think Katie is a bit confused. It was Jerry Seinfeld who had the relationship with a high school girl.

@theghoul9326

Ай бұрын

Woody did date Stacey Nelkin when she was still 17, which is what Manhattan is based upon, but it was legal and she still holds him in the highest regards.

Agree with Bill. I am 90% sure he's innocent and Dylan was manipulated. Dylan still appears emotionally damaged to me as an adult and I believe it was caused by Mia. Several of Mia's adopted children died and at least one by suicide. She hoarded children and was accused of abuse.

@sethzwicker3631

Ай бұрын

Also, she literally did the exact same thing with Andre Previn that Soon Yi did to her.

@jgillard71

Ай бұрын

It's that 10% that'll get ya

This is why we shouldn’t get involved in others’ private affairs. He’s found not guilty in court. Everything is consensual, even if some consider his preferences distasteful. He didn’t commit murder, violence or domestic abuse. Anything else he does in his private life is his business only !

It took a month for the lower court judge to arrive at a decision in Woody's custody battle with Mia. One month. Meaning it was no slam dunk decision. In fact, what you describe is the window dressing those who believe Woody engage in. Also, if Woody were innocent, then why did the lower court judge order him to pay Mia's legal fees, which totaled $1,000,000? There's something rotten in Denmark and it ain't the fish.

@rl12345

26 күн бұрын

There was no court case regarding Woody's guilt or innocence. There was a custody case which Woody lost because he was never the main caregiver. Quit trying to conflate two different things.

Director Robert B. Weide's article is good: www.thedailybeast.com/the-woody-allen-allegations-not-so-fast

@JimsPub-ds3qs

Ай бұрын

WOW! Excellent article.

Hard to believe that Katie Couric was once able to hold a news anchor job. She's really DULL

@dwocelot6913

Ай бұрын

And dumpy

@calholli

Ай бұрын

News anchor's just read what they are told on the teleprompter.

@tvguyjake

Ай бұрын

@@calholli not necessarily so. The better ones write their own copy.

Great channel Bill! Thank You’s!

so right!!!

'Believe all women'. Even if they're liars

@bryanismyname7583

Ай бұрын

I sympathize with the idea of believing women or even men who say they were abused or assaulted. But this is the problem with "Me Too" in that blindly believing without any room for discussion or for the legal principle of "innocent until proven guilty" can lead to overzealous attitudes. Granted, proving sexual assault can be very difficult, especially many years after the fact. For that reason, I do think every case should be considered individually and carefully. The Allen accusation case is very weak, and was weak even thirty years ago when any evidence would have been fresh.

@elise9537

Ай бұрын

yes why read into his ''dating'' patterns when you can believe whatever you want. most adults dont relate to teen and want to protect young ppl from pervs.

Woody got a raw deal. The wrath of Mia Farrow has absolutely no limits.

@DJ-bj8ku

Ай бұрын

Let’s face it, Woody got what was coming to him. You don’t betray and humiliate your romantic and working partner by taking nudes of and sleeping with Mia’s stepdaughter and then wonder why she’s vindictive. He could’ve easily had a relationship with someone on the outside. Epic lack of judgment and he’s paid for it by being ostracized personally and professionally.

@michaelcelani8325

Ай бұрын

​@@DJ-bj8ku ...Woody is a lying creep..!

@mcouzijn

Ай бұрын

@@DJ-bj8ku By 1991, Mia had NOT been Woody's romantic partner for FOUR YEARS. Mia had dumped Woody as her lover since 1987, when pregnant of Ronan, a child she would later admit is 'possibly not Woody's' (but Sinatra's). The custody trial reports are VERY clear about this. Mia and Woody weren't lovers from 1987 on, and by 1991 Mia had not been entitled to Woody's love (let alone 'faithfulness') for FOUR YEARS. If you believe Mia, it was SHE who cheated on a lover in 1987, not Woody in 1991. The relationship between Woody and Soon-Yi surely shocked and 'betrayed' Mia's expectations. But is was Mia's hateful response to it that damaged people's lives to the core. She should have found a much healthier way to deal with it, for her own sake, and for her children's sake - including Soon-Yi. As for your 'he should have dated someone from the outside' argument: we don't get to decide about other people's love life. Soon-Yi was an adult women 21 years of age, and had every *agency* to make her own life choices and choose her own partners. The romance between her and Woody was obviously serious, and has shown to be a big success in the past 30+ years.

@michaelcelani8325

Ай бұрын

@@mcouzijn ...You are NOT an expert on this situation. You have info from the media, which is more than third hand and unreliable. ...So Zip it Up. !

@Ausgar-yc1yl

11 күн бұрын

​@@DJ-bj8kuMia has NO step children.

I've been a Woody devotee since his stand-up days in '62. What he did, if he did, does not in any way diminish the contributions he has made. (And Mia did damn good work, too.) I have sympathy for Dylan and her trauma (real or coached), but she wasn't injured physically, and she lives a seemingly good life now.

Nice clip.

No one should form any judgments on this issue without having read Allen's book Apropos of Nothing. It contains a detailed and convincing account. The documentary is not dispositive.

@muziktrkr

Ай бұрын

In Woody’s book, the mention of Dory Previn’s lyrics and what Dylan Farrow said in her testimony made it seem like Mia brainwashed her daughter. Mia sabotaged Dory’s marriage to Andre, but karma paid her back with Soon Yi. Beware of young girls, indeed…. I’m sure Bill gave Dory a listen.

@surfwriter8461

Ай бұрын

Nonsense. I have no reason to trust what Allen says over others who were involved. He's been treated by authorities with special consideration various times, has lied and distorted accounts of his conduct, and was "exonerated" by police officials who were dishonest in trying to clear him out of their own bias. Saying the documentary is "not dispositive" is about as weak and useless as a defense can get. I don't take it as gospel, but I found a number of very compelling and troubling claims in that.

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

@@surfwriter8461 "He's been treated by authorities with special consideration..." "...police officials who were dishonest..." "Saying the documentary is "not dispositive" is about as weak and useless..." sounds like you have some subjective bias's of your own. I guess everybody does.

@gheller2261

16 күн бұрын

You're easily manipulated and one of the twisted people who actually want Dylan Farrow to have been abused so you can express your phony empathy. The alleged event of abuse that she now eagerly talks about almost certainly did not happen.

The high school woman Katie mentioned was his girlfriend. In NY, the age of consent is 17. That's true to this day.

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

She was 16

@angelthman1659

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 You're talking about the model who 'alleges' she had a relationship with Woody. That has not been confirmed. I'm talking about the one that has been confirmed, which was a 17 year old he dated, Stacey Nelkin.

@mcouzijn

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 No she wasn't. Why are you lying?

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

@mcouzijn hmmm... let me double check

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

@mcouzijn okay. Yes I was talking about Christina Engelhardt (Allen vs Farrow Episode 2, 18 minutes). She said she was 16 when they met. But stands by that she was 17 when they got involved. Either way super gross and shows a pattern personally and in scripts that Woody had no problem with older men being with much younger women.

Very acute take from Bill… #ibelievehim

“You can exonerated by law” So was OJ

Play it again, Sam was my introduction to comedy at 6 years old when my dad and I watched it. I still have no idea if he's a nonce or not.

Exonerated by the law doesn't mean you're innocent. See: OJ

@healthyfreesoul

Ай бұрын

Bill is losing his critical thinking faculties

@j.b.9260

Ай бұрын

The evidence is on Woody's side. Not so with OJ.

@BackyardStudios25

Ай бұрын

Think before you type. Jeeeezuz

@beerman204

Ай бұрын

Doesn't mean you are guilty either.

@mose192

Ай бұрын

False accusations are also very prevalent- best not to pass judgment without legal education

Katie Couric should be a good enough journalist and smart enough to know that what she saw was not a documentary. It was a hagiography of Mia Farrow.

@gheller2261

16 күн бұрын

Who cares if Woody Allen had a relationship with a high school girl? How is that any evidence of molesting a 7 year old? So dumb.

I think since people know he had a relationship (and marriage) with Soon Yi, that he probably was guilty of the Lindbergh Kidnapping.

Certainly Woody does nothing to help himself when some of his characters fall in love with young women who, in some cases, aren't even adults. I can also understand that marrying off your adopted daughter can destabilize more than one person. But he has been declared innocent more than once and Mia Farrow is not an example of psychological and emotional stability either. Each individual must do their own personal work to decide whether or not they continue to follow Woody on his cinematic adventure. Those who move forward also have Justice on their side. Those who are not capable of doing so only have their conscience, whether well or poorly informed.

@OMGWTFLOLSMH

Ай бұрын

I don't know what you mean by "marrying off your adopted daughter". Are you saying that Soon-Yi is Woody's adopted daughter? Because, if so, she is not, or was not, his adopted daughter. She is André Previn's adopted daughter.

@magicmike7198

Ай бұрын

@@OMGWTFLOLSMH You're right. He was the companion of Mia who was Soon-Yi's adoptive mother. My mistake. The degree of separation is even deeper... but just as questionable for many. But it is their personal job to accept or not.

@mcouzijn

Ай бұрын

Woody Allen made *50 movies* in *60 years' time*, including more than *a hundred* female 'love interests'. In these 50 movies, there's ONE teenager, who happens to be *above* the age of consent: 'Tracy' in Manhattan, a role particularly written to create an age-gap relationship in opposition to two age-appropriate lovers in that same movie (played by Meryl Streep and Diane Keaton). The relationship with young 'Tracy' is presented as age-INappropriate throughout the movie, and it FAILS in the end because of the age-gap, when 'Tracy' chooses her own path in life, abandoning 'Ike'. The average age of 'female lovers' in Woody's 50 movies is 33,5 which is OLD to Hollywood standards. 80% is between 25 and 55. ZERO underage. How can anyone know these facts, and still claim that Woody Allen movies are somehow replete with inappropriate relationships with 'young girls'?

@magicmike7198

Ай бұрын

@@mcouzijn Because they are. In the midst of the scandal with Mia, what film is he releasing? ''Husbands & Wives'' in which his character as a university professor is tempted by a young Juliette Lewis who plays his young student. It's not me who invents it. I remember very well the noise it caused at the time. Sure, she was an adult but that is what I mean when I say that he does nothing to help himself. Listen, I love Woody and I watch his movies all the time. I believe him and I think Mia is crazy and manipulative. I'm just saying he's not doing anything to help himself by having a great deal of his male characters in love with younger women. Rewatch his films. It happens a lot.

@mcouzijn

Ай бұрын

@@magicmike7198 As said, it does not "happen a lot". Your claim about that is factually mistaken. You seem to want Woody to *not* portray *any* middle-aged man with a much younger woman in her twenties, even when that relationship is adult, consensual, legal, happy, sad, whatever. Even when such May-September relationships (not even april-december) are very rare among Woody's more than a *hundred* female love-interests. And even when LOTS and LOTS of Hollywood movies are REPLETE with such age-gap relationships (Tom Cruise, Cary Grant, Sean Connery, Michael Douglas, Leonardo DiCaprio, you name them). What about Diane Keaton? Mia Farrow? Geraldine Page? Louise Lasser Judy Davis Mira Sorvino Gina Gershon Penélope Cruz Cate Blanchett Selena Gomez Elena Anaya Scarlett Johansson Rebecca Hall Meryl Streep Joy Behar Greta Gerwig Kate Winslet Dianne Wiest and the many, many 25-55 year old other actresses who played as 'love interests' in his movies? Yes, we have 'Manhattan', and 'Husbands and Wives' and 'Whatever Works'. Hey, the ploy about a middle-aged man confronted with a younger attractive woman (in their early twenties or so) has been a trope in movies and literature since Time Immemorial. People don't complain about other authors or moviemakers for using it. But somehow Woody should refrain from it, in order to not feed the *hordes* of his haters. I LOVE how Woody makes a Big Nose to those hating him for it. I LOVE how Melville Poupaud in 'Coup de Chance' plays with a 'toy train' in the 'attic' of his house. Art is not art if it only 'plays safe'. Really, I *do* understand your argument that these things 'do not help himself'. But at 88 years old, I think Woody is entitled to not giving a fook about what his haters think of him. He will, and is entitled to do, what pleases him. Let's give him that space.

Hell hath no fury...

@rievans57

Ай бұрын

Amen. Mia Farrow was out for blood.

@nicholasbinion8447

Ай бұрын

And willing to lie.

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

BS! Mia was hurt not vengeful. She finished a film with Allen even after she found out about Soon Yi

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 Mia called Woody on the phone screaming that she was going to poke his eyes out with needles. Nope, not vindictive at all.

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

@rl12345 and where did you get info on this "phone call"?

"Men want them to wear anklets nothing wrong with that." When he's 50 and she's 15 , uh, yeah....

People forget that Woody's wife at present was not his kid and was of age when she got together with woody. Mia was 19 years old when she married Frank Sinatra who was 49 years or did she forget that????

This is what Allen said in the October 4 1976 issue of People magazine. This is so creepy and telling.: "I try to have sex only with women I like a lot,” Woody explains solemnly. “Otherwise I find it fairly mechanical.” (He has little interest in family life: “It’s no accomplishment to have or raise kids. Any fool can do it.”) He goes on: “I’m open-minded about sex. I’m not above reproach; if anything, I’m below reproach. I mean, if I was caught in a love nest with 15 12-year-old girls tomorrow, people would think, yeah, I always knew that about him.” Allen pauses. “Nothing I could come up with would surprise anyone,” he ventures helplessly. “I admit to it all.”

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

Oh my God! That is so disgusting. He is guilty. Where was he for 20 minutes?!

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 There never was 20 missing minutes. After the allegation was made the nannies/babysitters tried to account for Dylan's whereabouts but each one had moments when they didn't see her and they came up with 20 missing minutes. This is what Mia confronts Woody with on the phone. Woody was aware that Mia was taping the phone calls, as was he and his lawyer made it clear for legal reasons not to engage her about the case over the phone. Hence his limited response. Now the problem with the nannies conclusion was the fact that none of them noted any specific time that she was missing, so that while one nanny may not have seen Dylan she may have simply been with another nanny the whole time. This means she could have been missing or she could very well have not been missing at all and just with different nannies at different times...not very solid evidence of a crime. Also, none of the nannies once ever saw Woody and Dylan alone together, in fact they weren't even paying attention to Woody so as far as they knew Dylan could have been missing and Woody could have been standing behind them. Moses, however, was paying attention to Woody and stated at the time and continues to state that Woody never left his sight and was never alone with Dylan. On top of that, phone records from Woody's limousine have him arriving at Mia's house only 20 to 30 minutes before her return from shopping. During that time he received a phone call, was spotted giving birthday presents to Dylan (she was with the babysitter) and was spotted sitting in the TV room watching TV with Dylan and 6 other children. He also states at one point he went to the bathroom. Assign 5 minutes to each task and you have 20 minutes accounted for...so basically he didn't have time to secret Dylan away from under the noses of an entire household and commit a crime before Mia returned. Lastly, the nanny Kristie Groeteke told the other nanny Monica Thompson that she rethought the missing time and concluded that Dylan was only missing from her for 5 minutes. Conclusion: there was no missing 20 minutes.

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

@rl12345 What is your source?

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 Phone records come from Robert Weide who made the documentary about Woody. He got the information from Woody's lawyers. Moses's statement come from his essay A Son Speaks Out and is corroborated by the nanny Monica Thompson's court testimony. Woody being seen in the TV room comes from the court testimony of the babysitter Alison Strickland. Woody going to the bathroom comes from his court testimony and his autobiography. Everything else comes from a combination of the nannies court testimonies and from the nanny Kristie Groteke's book Love and Betrayal about her time as being the nanny during the breakup of Mia and Woody.

@f.b.8254

Ай бұрын

Um, LINK? Don't just dump and run. You must back up your comments with a link to a REPUTABLE source, and not just some BS from a Pro-Mia Woody Allen hit piece.

He had an affair with his step daughter & he's still with her. He's in Jerry Lee Lewis territory here. It's an admitted fact. Making excuses for it reveals something about one's self.

@Ausgar-yc1yl

Ай бұрын

Wrong. Woody was never married to Mia and Soon Yi was not his step daughter. He has no step children.

@f.b.8254

Ай бұрын

SOON YI PREVIN WAS NEVER WOODY ALLEN'S STEP DAUGHTER.

@joachimwalle3760

Ай бұрын

That's creepy, but it's not evil.

@erniehudson1

Ай бұрын

that is the worst and most primitive way to argue - if you defend someone who has been accused of a crime you must be a sympathizer of this crime. This guilty by association attitude makes a any kind of fair trial impossible and is practiced by the most vile and primitive people.

@Bigwave2003

Ай бұрын

Big difference. Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13-year-old cousin. Woody Allen starting dating Soon-Yi, the adopted daughter of his girlfriend, when she was 21. He married her when she was 27.

The guest's chair looks so damn uncomfortable all the time.

I agree with Katie

A father married an adopted and/or step daughter. And this is not inappropriate behavior?? I beg to differ.

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

A father can't marry an adopted daughter or a step-daughter...it's illegal.

@davidsheriff9274

Ай бұрын

Soon-Yi was NOT his adopted or step daughter. She had an adoptive father, it's Andre Previn, that's why her name is Soon -Yi Previn.

@cherolson6480

Ай бұрын

Clarification: Mia Farrows live in partner, Woody Allen, marrying her child is not appropriate behavior.

@davidsheriff9274

Ай бұрын

@@cherolson6480 Woody and Mia never lived together. Woody's and Soon -Yi have been married for over thirty five years and have two well adjusted adopted children that have had nothing bad to say about their parents, what is so terrible about that? Anyway,his relationship with Soon-Yi has absolutely nothing to do with the allegations against him by Dylan.

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

@@cherolson6480 You might want to issue another clarification...Woody and Mia never lived together. In fact, Woody never once spent the night at Mia's.

He believes Woody’s innocent but Michael Jackson is guilty even though both were acquitted?

The whole situation would become a lot clearer if one more person came forward and accused him.

What is that movie poster that sits behind Katie Couric? The tagline reads “One Credit Short” I’m racking my brain here.

If Woody Allen looked like Brad Pitt or Ryan Gosling, do you think people would be so quick to jump to conclusions? I believe most of the women I know who rail against Woody would instead say, “Wait a minute - let’s re-examine this…”

I don't think that Woody is a good person, from many things he's said over the years. But I don't think he did the act Mia accused him of. The investigation by the hospital involving 9 interviews with Dylan, the confirmation by a second hospital, the pediatrician Mia took Dylan to. None of them seem to think Dylan had been molested. If there is viable additional evidence, then Dylan and Mia need to take Woody to court. He was never charged so there's no instance of double jeopardy. As to the high school girl, Woody admits to dating a 17 year old, and a few years back another woman claimed she was with Woody starting when she was 16. She also mentions that a few times he'd bring Mia along. Regardless, these points are irrelevant to the case at hand. I love his work as a filmmaker, but if he's guilty I wouldn't hesitate to say he should be locked up if he did these things. Just like I love the film 'Chinatown' but am angered that Polanski never did the time in jail he should have. But these things need to be decided in a court room, not on a street corner, in a back alley, or on an HBO TV series. We can't let our justice system dissolve into "guilty by accusation".

@bryanismyname7583

Ай бұрын

This is just it: If there had been evidence at the time, thirty years ago, it would have likely gone to court. But the case was dismissed for lack of evidence. The surrounding confusion about Allen's relationship with Soon Yi, Mia's then-19 year old adopted daughter with Andre Previn, has confused many people over the years. But anyone who actually cares to look at the timeline of events and the actual stories of what happened, will find that it just doesn't add up. I think this is one of the worst examples of the "Me Too" movement. It undermines the entire idea behind stopping assault of women and girls, particularly, because it is based on a faulty premise.

@therealmattdamon5161

Ай бұрын

Dating a 16 year old is wrong and illegal. Seems like you have all the evidence you need

@theghoul9326

Ай бұрын

There is no evidence he ever dated a 16yo. The woman in question seems quite delusional, as she’s talked extensively about being visited by inter-dimensional beings almost daily who would give her instructions. Neither Woody or Farrow have confirmed anything she said.

I never believed Mia either. Maybe u could dissect Dershowitz next. Now, he's guilty...

what comes across to me is Maher's pomposity and spitefulness - you are right Bill - YOU DON'T KNOW- the fact that Ronan Farrow supports his sister is enough for me - that was one weird household-

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

Moses supports his sister Soon Yi, but doesn't support his sister Dylan. Moses was 14 at the time. Ronan was 3.

@mcouzijn

Ай бұрын

If you like to base your opinion on Dylan's brother's stance, then I suggest you base it on the brother who was 14 at the time rather than 3, and who was the only *direct witness* on the alleged 'abuse afternoon'. His name is Moses Farrow, and just like Dylan, lived with Mia, and was adopted by Mia and Woody. Moses kept his watch of his little sister all the time, as he'd been instructed by their mother to never let her alone with Woody. So he watched them like a hawk for the 20 minutes after Woody's arrival at Mia's house, and Mia's return from 'shopping'. Right after his mother had alleged Woody of having molested Dylan, he immediately told his nanny that Dylan *could not have been abused* as he had watched them all the time, and they had never been out of the tv room together. Moses also claimed that their mother had 'made up' the abuse story. The nanny (Monica Thompson) gave sworn testimony of this, and Moses has kept this stance for over 30 years now. But hey, if you want to believe 'the other brother', who has no personal recollection of the event at all, and who *refuses* to take legal responsibility for his allegation, which Ronan pushes in the media while *shunning* our courts, judges and juries, well, go ahead then. It's a free world - and alas, it's not free from naivety, nor from false allegations.

@galepatrick1702

Ай бұрын

@@mcouzijn actually nobody knows but Dylan and Allen - what benefit for her to lie?

@theghoul9326

Ай бұрын

@@galepatrick1702There has been a lot of benefit to her lying. Namely to sell some of her books and get on TV shows. But she may not be lying, she may actually believe it happened to her.

@rl12345

26 күн бұрын

​@@galepatrick1702 Moses knows. He was there and he said Woody never left his sight. That's called an alibi.

The story of Sunyee should tell you everything you need to know. I do not believe the documentary at all especially coming from Mia and Ronan and Dylan.

Having read both Mia’s and Woody’s autobiographies, I find his far more credible than hers.

Woody is a weird ass dude

Yup, Mr. Allen is, in my world is a great man!

Coup De Chance is now in release in America. Even psycho Mia can't keep the genius down ❤🎉

@OMGWTFLOLSMH

Ай бұрын

I haven't seen it yet, but it gets pretty good reviews. At 88, there can't be too many more films left in Woody. This could be his last effort.

@steveconn

Ай бұрын

Heard he's already planning his next :)

@davidsheriff9274

Ай бұрын

It looks like it's in the vein of Crimes and Misdemeanors and Match Point, I can't wait to see it.

I usually disagree with Bill (half joking), but he's got this one right. Deep dive both sides of this one and its pretty obvious.

Bill, honestly, you rub me the wrong way but gosh darn it I like ya. You’re kinda like the annoying ball player on the other team. “He’s” annoying because he’s on the other team. But, really, you don’t like him cause he’s very talented, knows it, and leans into it. I love the clips. Please, keep them coming. The more the better. Might be worth a 2nd channel, idk. I do know but I don’t wanna tell you what to do…

Woody is innocent

@elise9537

Ай бұрын

as innocent as Bill is.

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

@@elise9537 Agreed, Bill didn't do anything to Dylan either.

Katie Couric is quite literally the only person I have ever seen not let Bill Maher monopolize the interview. Well done!

@hilogreg5216

Ай бұрын

true but not true, Maher has had on many guests who hold there own with him

@calholli

Ай бұрын

@@hilogreg5216 I don't think these people watch anything but the short clips. lol

@user-hr4lq8ue8j

Ай бұрын

We must have been watching a different interview seems he did dominate most of the exchange

I'm with Bill, I love Woody Allen. I don't believe the accusation and there are so many holes in her story. Woody had relationships with HS student with her parents permission, and had trios with Mia Farrow. Woody is a horndog, and so many others are, or can hide it.

And we don’t know

Happy Passover, Bill! ❤🎉

@kickazz999

Ай бұрын

Glory to Go❤d Bill😊

@frankmarsh1159

Ай бұрын

He's not Jewish. He was raised Catholic...

I agree with you, Bill. Mia was being very revengeful and why wouldn’t Mia have known before the situation with Sunyee

I would wholeheartedly recommend great YT documentary on this topic called "By the way, Woody Allen is innocent"

In cases like these I always say child molesters never just have 1 victim, they have numerous. So as weird as Woody, as well as MJ, I don't think either one was a child molester. I just don't think molesters stop after 1 or two, they can't control themselves.

Another bad take by bill. He’s so often wrong in his takes yet so pompous.

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

Why is he wrong this time?

@ExcitedAnacondaSnake-hg8ec

Ай бұрын

@@rl12345 the actor not wanting to work with him are “puzzies” is a bad take. Or the fact there is nothing inherently creepy about marrying your stepdaughter you helped raised. His narrative is almost verbatim the 60 minutes interview of woody Allen. He doesn’t give much credence to anyone else around the situation. The fact woody had a relationship with a high schooler desperate from Mia incident. Finally, the fact that almost all of his movies either feature an underage or nearly underage young woman having an affair with an older man. He obviously has a hard on for age inappropriate young women. It’s also the way he presents his opinions. It’s extremely pompous and arrogant, and he condescends to people that disagree as if they could only come to their conclusion through folly and his view is the right view. He has bad social skills, low on empathy, doesn’t have the humility to present his views as opinions that could be wrong, or respect other views.

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

@@ExcitedAnacondaSnake-hg8ec While your information about Woody is incorrect, I agree with your last statement on Maher.

Mia married Frank Sinatra when he was 50 and Mia was 20 It’s hilarious that she was full of rage when 21 year old Soon Ji fell in love with and subsequently married Woody Allen, who was then in his 40s Poor Mia. Hell knows no fury like a woman scorned

If what I have heard is correct, in 90% of custody cases the court grants custody to the mother.

0:49 Especially Mira Sorvino whose career was derailed by an actual predator in Harvey Weinstein and Woody Allen chose her anyway. And now she abandons him.

@davidsheriff9274

Ай бұрын

Just like all these hypocritical actors. These allegations about Woody have been around since the early nineties and they all had no problem working with him saying what an honor it was,Mira actually won an Oscar for her role in his movie,then the me too movement comes along and suddenly they all say "oh, I regret it so much, I shouldn't have done it, I'm giving the money back". Such cowards.

I don't think Woody did that what Mia Farrow accused him of either. I do believe that Woody is a creep. He's such a weirdo.

@etherspin

Ай бұрын

Well yeah, sick as it might be to delve into, it's not the same attraction, post pubescent but still young girls vs little kids IF Allen has the attraction to like 15 year old to 17 year old girls or something

They ruined one of the great movie makers in America because of their obsession with this unsubstantiated crime. By the way, Allen alluded to his own disdain for child molestors in a movie. It’s so unlikely he would transfer his like for young women into molesting a child. And in an attic they said? It’s unbelievable. They ruined his career and his legacy. I say that even though I don’t like how he took up with that Soon-Yi person. But at least they stayed together through all these years.

@bryanismyname7583

Ай бұрын

Exactly. There's a huge difference between dating a 17/18 year old and go after a 7 year old. I don't like the idea of 40 year old men dating 18 year old, but it's not a crime nor is it the same as assaulting a child.

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

Lol. I would hardly say his career was ruined. He has made very successful films in the past 30 years. And at 88 he just released another one. He got away with a crime because he is rich, powerful and he brings in millions into New York.

@rossriver75yukon27

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 Successful films, yes. Not 30 years, 50 years by the way. And how many young people know of his movies? How often do you hear good things said about his works? That’s because people ( like you) chose to believe that rumor. And you obviously define success as making the money and that’s all.

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

@rossriver75yukon27 you make no sense. Woody has always been critically acclaimed. I said 30 years because that's when the accusations happened. They didn't hurt his career at all. He still received Oscars and other awards. And what do young people know about anything other than the Super Hero universe. Btw: Woody has been successful since the 1950's as a writer, then a comedian/filmmaker in the 1960's

@rossriver75yukon27

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 I know all that. But, no. There’s a smudge a mile wide on him. Anybody that looks at his works now, thinks of scandal right along side.

No one really knows anything about the situation. Only the participants. Not the observers. Heard vs.Depp i.e.

I think the fbi needs to check bills hard drive

"High Schooler" sounds worse than a 17, 18, or 19 year old which is legal. That's why they use it.

@Bickle121

13 күн бұрын

You'd be okay with your 17 year old daughter with a 42 year old ?

@Ausgar-yc1yl

11 күн бұрын

​@@Bickle121Soon Yi was 21 in high school.

@Bickle121

11 күн бұрын

@@Ausgar-yc1yl sure...... conveniently they only fell in love when she was 21 even though he knew her since she was a child.

What has Mia’s brother got to do with Woody molesting his adopted daughter

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

Mia's brother actually went to prison for multiple counts of child molestation. Hmmm...where may have Mia's story come from? Was her brother around her children much?

@yogione

Ай бұрын

Woody didn't molest "his" adopted daughter. He didn't molest Soon Yi Previn, either.

@calholli

Ай бұрын

I'm literally looking at an image where she's sitting on his lap and she barely looks 6 or 7 years old. There are endless photos of the family together in public when she's just a IittIe girI. smh

@theghoul9326

Ай бұрын

@@calholliThe image you’re seeing is his own adopted daughter Bechet, not Soon-Yi. There are no such photos of him with Soon-Yi as a child.

@calholli

Ай бұрын

@@theghoul9326 again.. I can't link you things or I would. This isn't the place for this discussion.. I've sent you 6 replies and they all vanished.

They’ve been together for over 30 years. Let them be.

"sketchy' and "damning"......Couric's journalistic research is astounding....."I mean did you watch the documentary"? she says to Bill 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Bill was also good buddies with Hugh Hefner. So its good to keep that in mind.

@gheller2261

16 күн бұрын

Huh? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

@Octavian2

15 күн бұрын

@@gheller2261 you either know or you don't.

We? Speak for yourself Bill.

I saw the documentary and there was definitely some creepy stuff in there. But I don’t remember anything in it about a relationship with a high school girl nor a past girlfriend talking about Allen wanting her to dress up in anklets. Was that in that doc? That doesn’t sound familiar.

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

Definitely I saw the segment on the high school girl. The dressing up thing must have come from somewhere else.

@mcouzijn

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 Probably from the depths of Couric's fantasy.

Woody Allen is guilty as sin

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

Guilty of being hilarious!

@yogione

Ай бұрын

In fact, he isn''t guilty of anything. Do some research. I've known Wallace Shawn since I was three, and he has the whole low down, including Nancy Sinatra revealing the Mia confessed to her that she made it all up. How vindictive.

@rl12345

Ай бұрын

@@yogione Oh, spill some more Wallace Shawn tea, please. I thought he was great in Rifkin's Festival.

@theghoul9326

Ай бұрын

@@yogioneWould love to know more about this Nancy Sinatra thing.

Did you not hear the phone call from his wife? He was silent l, and acknowledged what he did was wrong. Woodchipper

@thekarachannel4281

Ай бұрын

He knew it was being recorded.

@cactaceous

Ай бұрын

That’s your assumption. He knew she was acting, because she was feigning her emotions, so he most likely could tell she was recording him and putting on that crocodile tears show since if a person truly believed a young child had been molested… they would be yelling bloody murder out of disgust and rage. She was calm and trying to portray emotions. She was lying. She lied, she pretended Sinatra’s child was Woody’s, she coached the children, she ruined a lot of lives. Purposely.

@truespirit730

Ай бұрын

Mia did not lie or coach her kids. Professionals watched the tapes and analyzed them on the documentary. Both Mia and Woody recorded the phone calls. All information is in the documentary

@cactaceous

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 The documentary is a fully biased hit piece. The authorities, two branches of them, did their investigations and deemed Woody Allen was not responsible for any alleged wrongdoing and that Mia Farrow’s testimonial information was misleading and a doctor who examined the child said the child had been “coached”. That is empirical reality. If Mia Farrow’s accusation had been truthful, Woody Allen would be in jail!! He is not.

@cactaceous

Ай бұрын

@@truespirit730 The documentary is a fully biased hit piece. The authorities, two branches of them, did their investigations and deemed Woody Allen was not responsible for any alleged wrongdoing and that Mia Farrow’s testimonial information was misleading and a doctor who examined the child said the child had been “coached”. That is empirical reality. If Mia Farrow’s accusation had been truthful, Woody Allen would be in jail!! He is not.

Katie’s part of the problem…

I’m with Bill all the way on this!!

Even before the movie/documentary, it was obvious that Woody had a "woody" for the little girl - they did wind up together.

@dandybufo9664

25 күн бұрын

Have you ever met a fact that you didn’t ignore ?

Let’s face it, Woody got what was coming to him. You don’t betray and humiliate your romantic and working partner by taking nudes of and sleeping with Mia’s stepdaughter and then wonder why she’s vindictive. He could’ve easily had a relationship with someone on the outside. Epic lack of judgment and he’s rightfully paid for it by being ostracized personally and professionally.

@davidsheriff9274

Ай бұрын

So you're saying that because he had a relationship with Soon-Yi who was not his adopted daughter and she was of legal age, that means that Mia is justified in ruining his life as revenge by accusing him of being a child molester? Is that what you are saying?

@Ausgar-yc1yl

Ай бұрын

She was NOT Mias step daughter and Mia has NO step children.

Yikes.

I'm with Bill on this one. I respect Couric's take though-- she might think he's guilty, but she's honest enough to say "I don't know." A lot of people seem to WANT him to be guilty so they can win an argument or whatever. Think about that. They'd rather have a child molested than lose a debate. Sick people.

Bill, what does Mia Farrow's brother have to do with it? Nothing.

@OMGWTFLOLSMH

Ай бұрын

And you know this how? Mia's brother is a convicted sex criminal and was sentenced to prison for 10 years for abusing young boys. Is it possible this uncle molested a young Dylan and she confused him with Woody? The entire family story/history, on all sides, is FUBAR.

@bryanismyname7583

Ай бұрын

Well, actually it is relevant. Her brother was convicted of assaulting children and she has defended him in the past. Mia's motivation in her sudden story about Dylan while in the middle of a custody battle and after losing her longtime boyfriend to her own 19 year old adopted daughter Soon Yi makes a lot of sense when you know that about her brother.

The ex was resentful that he was dating their adopted daughter.

@matthewche

Ай бұрын

Mia’s adopted daughter from her marriage to Andre Previn.

@TwinPeaksArchive1

Ай бұрын

Soon Yi is the adopted daughter of Mia Farrow and Andre Previn.

@celestialnubian

Ай бұрын

Not "their", her daughter.

@jackspencer8290

Ай бұрын

Soon Yi was NOT "their" daughter. Mia Farrow and Woody Allen were never married. Allen was never a father figure to Soon Yi. Soon Yi has a father - Andre Previn.

@GloriaVictisDiesIlla

Ай бұрын

Soon-Yi Previn is not and has never been Allen's adopted daughter. She is the adopted daughter of André Previn and Mia Farrow, and she and Allen got together when she was 21. We cannot know if he did what he's accused of or not but this interview to Soon-Yi (whom Mia Farrow abused for years) speaks volumes, especially if one considers that the reason why so many believe the accusations is because of a misguided view of what happened with Soon Yi in the first place. vulture.com/2018/09/soon-yi-previn-speaks.html