That’s some amazing chess fantastic commentary too. Just some quality KZread right here.

The commentators are superb

@jaredconnor

Жыл бұрын

They're stockfish commentators let's be real

@SreeramReddyB

Жыл бұрын

the commentators are stupid, chess does not need commentating, as there are millions and millions of combinations possible , we cannot predict until the very end, initially they told Radjabov pieces are weak, king side pawn structure is broken, it is weak, he is going to lose etc... but what happened? it is a draw.

@reql5487

Жыл бұрын

@@SreeramReddyB U can always watch it muted if u don't like commentators in chess ;)

@SreeramReddyB

7 ай бұрын

​@@reql5487 That is not the point here, the commentators make stupid of themselves... I can watch it muted or not is up to me.

@reql5487

7 ай бұрын

@@SreeramReddyB But, you wrote "chess does not need commentating". So I ask. What would you like to listen if you don't like people talking about the game? Could be music, animal sounds?

Who are the commentators? They’re good:)

@AKB19991

2 жыл бұрын

Jovanka Houska , an english IM and David Howell, an english super GM

@kingviper3444

Жыл бұрын

@@AKB19991 no wonder hes so good at commentating, hes a super GM hes gonna know why they make the moves that they make and how to explain it

Who won

44:06 why didn’t magnus go Qd6 line up both rooks on the diagonal and if Re8 or Rb8 push pawn. Very interesting endgame

@bijnov84

Жыл бұрын

because u dont think like a GM

If Simon plays like he comment in the early game i won't believe he's a gm

I feel like I can beat both of these guys.

@user-vr9vs1cq3j

2 жыл бұрын

You just dreaming ☻

@jrd33

2 жыл бұрын

Facts don't care about your feelings.

@jetazzetaz35

2 жыл бұрын

@@jrd33 actually it does, and I can prove it

@jetazzetaz35

2 жыл бұрын

U hurt my feelings@@jrd33

@jrd33

2 жыл бұрын

@@jetazzetaz35 I'm OK with that :-)

I don't see why Rodjabov did not capture that pawn at the end.

@bisayadong

2 жыл бұрын

Qd6 check then capture the rook.

@bijnov84

Жыл бұрын

because u dont think like a GM

@peterpuleo2904

Жыл бұрын

@@bijnov84 No, I don't. Do you ?

@egidijuslukas-ge5rb

Жыл бұрын

You talking about 42:27? Queen moves 1 to the left, ceck he has to move the king and loses 1 rook in the process. I was thinking about that one for a while

The impartial pumpkin amazingly separate because airbus surely compare per a impartial calculator. changeable, juvenile glider

@TheSoulBlossom

2 жыл бұрын

agreed

@roshankr8692

2 жыл бұрын

Oh very profound

At 11:07 Carlson could play Qc5 winning the game

@poldreborn4281

Жыл бұрын

um how?

@blalala6181

Жыл бұрын

What drugs u take? Must be good

🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿