Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM)
Ғылым және технология
LRASM is a long range, precision-guided anti-ship missile leveraging off of the successful JASSM-ER heritage, and is designed to meet the needs of U.S. Navy and Air Force warfighters.
LRASM is a long range, precision-guided anti-ship missile leveraging off of the successful JASSM-ER heritage, and is designed to meet the needs of U.S. Navy and Air Force warfighters.
Пікірлер: 7 500
I like how Lockheed creates a CGI enemy combatant ship that just happens to look exactly like a Russian ship.
@kguy6635
2 жыл бұрын
Slava Ukraini!
@strategiccommander4736
Жыл бұрын
@@kguy6635 Heroyam salo
@fluffyx1556
Жыл бұрын
atleast its historically accurate
@derprofi-ky4zn
11 ай бұрын
yeah I think it’s a Russian Varyag Class Destroyer
@derprofi-ky4zn
11 ай бұрын
* Cruiser
Amazing advertising, I am convinced .Going to order 2 FA-18 and 10 LRASM
@gigachad8425
2 жыл бұрын
underrated
@SahilKhan-ws5hb
2 жыл бұрын
A varyyy good choice indeed
@tinto278
2 жыл бұрын
lol F/A-18 is Boeing LOL if you worked in the defense industry you would know how funny that sounds LOLOOLOL order hornets from Lockheed LOOLOLOLOL
@debmalyaghosh3474
2 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣 Me too...for Diwali
@Abhinav-gu2ui
2 жыл бұрын
@@debmalyaghosh3474 🤣
One of the ship in the video is no longer a surface vessel. It's now a special operation sub.
@5tarSailor
Жыл бұрын
Russia has 2 more slavas. But we can turn that to 0 soon if we just go to war
@phillipmavrogenis2041
Жыл бұрын
Hahahaha good one.
@nightraven836
Жыл бұрын
Yamato class Coral Reef :D
@edvin_hook
Жыл бұрын
Life hack why buy one when one can be both
@alexkor380
Жыл бұрын
Rocket - from usa... Missile guidance - from the usa... Operation management - from usa... Result - the United States sank a Russian ship that did not threaten the United States. And now in Ohio, people are being poisoned after a train crash and a chemical spill. In another state, a hydrochloric acid tank overturned - also poisoning people. Retribution?
It is the year 2022, and we now know: Yes, the Slava class missile cruiser indeed needs 2 missiles to die
@anderslindstrom2336
2 жыл бұрын
Not only does it die to just two missiles, it dies to just two non-stealthy Harpoon-skis.
@D3R3bel
2 жыл бұрын
Russia : hypes up every single one of their military equipment and gives completely fictacious claims as to their capabilities US DOD : OH FUCK OH NO WE NEED NEXT GEN TECH TO STAY RELEVANT NOWWWW *Accidentally makes weapon 20 years ahead of enemy tech*
@Husker513
2 жыл бұрын
Many people thought it's not true and pentagon's dream, but it's real
@randomperson5775
2 жыл бұрын
@@D3R3bel isnt that how the F-15 was made
@D3R3bel
2 жыл бұрын
@@randomperson5775 yes.
Heres a cool name: Orbital Range Global Anti Ship Missile (ORGASM)
@LightYourDarkness
4 жыл бұрын
Good one
@howard5030
4 жыл бұрын
C TheeZee we'll be waiting for that to happen
@Kjearbyeyeet
4 жыл бұрын
ahahha nice!
@jaemelcollado6394
4 жыл бұрын
C TheeZee bright kid
@pdfrchieve
4 жыл бұрын
Hhahaha good one m8
Another Cool Name: High Altitude Next-Gen Defense Joint Operation Bomb (HANDJOB)
@squishy2229
3 жыл бұрын
Y E S .
@thecommentator3732
3 жыл бұрын
Noise
@victornavea6197
3 жыл бұрын
Underrated coment
@bobkin611
3 жыл бұрын
Worst H.A.N.D.J.O.B. the enemy has ever had
@richardmillhousenixon
3 жыл бұрын
Only thing that makes this kinda not work is the fact that NORAD is an acronym in itself
The Rapid Dragon launches up to 9 palletized LRSMS from a C-17 or C-130 at one time instead of only 2 from an F-18. Using cargo airplanes to launch LRSM swarms is a big force multiplier in both land attack and surface warfare. Tests confirmed the concept in January 2022.
@benjaminherrington8124
Жыл бұрын
who the fuck are you larry
@e.s.4017
Жыл бұрын
Back here after they released a video recently and holy shit
@mfawls9624
Жыл бұрын
Those things are scary beautiful.
@Gigachadent
Жыл бұрын
How would it fare if enemy ships had a similar CIWS defense system as the phalanx?
@hermes_0440
Жыл бұрын
@@Gigachadent A Single CWIS has around 2500 rounds of ammo and a rate of fire of ca. 60 Rounds per second. A C-17 can carry 45 LRASM/JASSM. If you do the math (2500/45=55) it shows that you can only use 55 rounds per Missile before you need to reload wich leaves no room for missing also it has to be reloaded manually wich is very dangerous during a battle. If you have two CWIS like the Burke class the you have better chances as long as only one C-17 drops rapid dragon. The best defence you could have is what the German Bundesmarine(Federal Navy) is doing and mount cannons that use FAPDS or AHEAD ammunition like the Mantis system.
Recent sinking show Russian ships can’t shoot down regular missiles let alone a stealth type
@tracym8952
2 жыл бұрын
Worry about china's missle defense systems. They might work like how we thought russia's would
@LRRPFco52
Жыл бұрын
There were leaked reports on how their systems were non mission-capable, unmaintained, crews not trained, SAMs didn't work, Radars nowhere near ready for deployment, but they needed show of force.
@arizonamidnight5294
Жыл бұрын
@@tracym8952 we'll find out soon enough
@unsungheroes8556
Жыл бұрын
@@tracym8952 china missile tech and defense systems is a copy from russia so.
@deebil8099
Жыл бұрын
@@tracym8952 China's missile defense systems are copies of Russia's missile defense systems. Even if they don't break, they are still designed to not work like the Russian missile defense system.
Lockheed Martin is uploading the videos on youtube like peoples gonna buy it xddddd
@captainawasome8985
4 жыл бұрын
I buy their stocks so... that makes me part owner of those cool toys! - Even if i cant have fun with them myself.
@thechlebek901
4 жыл бұрын
*secret technology*
@liberatetheworld1776
4 жыл бұрын
It’s been tested and proven.
@m_louie
4 жыл бұрын
We are i mean its expensive but it is worth it i mean the technology behind it all is amazing
@liberatetheworld1776
4 жыл бұрын
Just wait until a war where America can use theses babies.
The missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn’t
@princevegeta6236
4 жыл бұрын
It is able to where it isn't by deviation and variation.
@mobiusone_8483
4 жыл бұрын
Bullshits 😂😂🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
@ryanchuabowen2045
4 жыл бұрын
@@Mono-tc3mq A documentary explaining vectors badly
@christianitis
4 жыл бұрын
Nicos Eftychiou it knows this because it knows where it has been, or where it was
@topmovieclips7032
4 жыл бұрын
kzread.info/dash/bejne/gquD0M6md8fFeMo.html
It seems like we don't need to worry about the Slava class anymore
I love the direction Lockheed Martin is going with this drop. Finally copped a couple of new LRASM after missing the initial launch and all the restocks.
This battle is literally them shooting 3 missiles at the enemy. But the music and animations make it seem so much more epic.
@globallyfamouse6609
3 жыл бұрын
firing 3 misiles at an enemy war ship is pretty cool
@secondlayer7898
3 жыл бұрын
that's what modern naval battles are
@koekiejam18
3 жыл бұрын
@@secondlayer7898 nope, modern naval battles is shooting hundreds of missiles from really far away. If an attack with these missiles would ever take place, it would be a swarm of missiles. only 3 will easily get picked off by CIWS's and other surface to air defense systems.
@ReformedSooner24
3 жыл бұрын
I swear I’ve heard the music from somewhere before
@richardmoore609
3 жыл бұрын
@@koekiejam18 a missile this fast and low to the water is very hard to lock on the fly
When will this game release? Looks realistic af
@karanmedhane835
4 жыл бұрын
savangiinduuri But in reality this is unrealistic af
@sheeplord4976
4 жыл бұрын
CMNAO
@karanmedhane835
4 жыл бұрын
tron No mate that weapon is shit
@Apollo-tj1vm
3 жыл бұрын
2019, Ace combat 7
@myinfoisgone3868
3 жыл бұрын
Welcome to camp woosh
Fun fact , 4.16 This warship is now really wrecked.
@efzap6516
2 жыл бұрын
To a missile system that is far inferior to this. Lmao
@burroaks7
2 жыл бұрын
@@efzap6516 prophetic irony at its finest
@josephkermitjoestar3881
2 жыл бұрын
not really wrecked, just converted into a permanent underwater warship.
@davidv.2050
2 жыл бұрын
Moskva on special mission to Davy Jones Locker.
@keepingcalm6469
2 жыл бұрын
Westerners exagerate - the fire is under control now.
How ironic. In the vid, the Moskva died. Couple years later that exact thing happened, but with Neptune missiles.
@user-tm3si7pw3u
3 ай бұрын
Typical propaganda: in reality, Mosva was sunked by the frogman, not missile. Neptune is just a copy of the Russian Uran missile.
@pvt.potato1943
2 ай бұрын
@@user-tm3si7pw3uDoes that really make it better?
@pvt.potato1943
2 ай бұрын
@@user-tm3si7pw3uInstead of your flagship being sunk by a guided missile, it was sunk by some bloke with an explosive charge underwater.
@sethb3090
12 күн бұрын
@user-tm3si7pw3u So you're saying a Russian anti ship missile couldn't have done the job? Reject missile, return to frog
Back in WWII, they called those Japanese pilots.
@randomguy-pv2rk
5 жыл бұрын
Lol
@somethingsomethingname25
5 жыл бұрын
Lol
@chansedowning3800
5 жыл бұрын
RealExivus nice one lol
@gyrozeppeli6716
5 жыл бұрын
kamikazes
@ronancollins4006
5 жыл бұрын
I came into the comments expecting questions, not laughs 😂😂
Imagine you're in the year 2030. You're a pilot and accidentally fire this missile and you think of nothing, but 30 minutes later you get a "Friendly Fire -50 pts" pop-up
@Wickedonezz
3 жыл бұрын
It requires previous lock on
@vereinigtekonigreicheoster35
3 жыл бұрын
To be fair nowadays missiles lock on very quickly
@guyschell2321
3 жыл бұрын
I was in Afghanistan in the brigade TOC when the Air Force accidentally dropped a 500 pound bomb on one of our own bases because they got the bad guys position and the good guys position mixed up WHEN DROPPING A 500 FUCKING POUND BOMB a JDAM and you never heard about it lol
@fangabxyfangabxy8563
3 жыл бұрын
Target destroyed (friendly fire) -$26,000,000,000 “Oh my God I’m never going to pay this down!”
@MickShoemaker17
3 жыл бұрын
"You will be returned to the hanger if you continue to harm frendlies"
Six years later, this become true
@keepingcalm6469
2 жыл бұрын
Also the desired point of impact seemed to be fitting.... maybe this video inspired something :)
"Did we score at least a hit?!" "Yes Captain! " "Oh thank God! Those three missiles were one year's worth of the entire Navy's budget!"
@sunrisejackdaw1779
Жыл бұрын
"Good news, we've bankrupted the United States Navy!" "What's the bad news?" "We're out of ships to use."
@-coolerlegothings-9784
Жыл бұрын
An attack like this would cost around 12 million for the missiles, but at least the enemy lost something 100 times as valuable
@jurajsintaj6644
Жыл бұрын
@@-coolerlegothings-9784 yep, destroyers cost about 1 billion, and the Moskva was a very expensive cruiser
@jurajsintaj6644
Жыл бұрын
If you're working with the Russian navy budget, atleast
@tobyw9573
Жыл бұрын
F-35s are now cheaper to buy than F-18s. Gotta consider how much is paid for development, startup, and service.
Me: just browsing youtube for some new videos KZread: let's throw you some experimental military porn from 4 years ago because why not Edit: how and why did this get so much attention
@pizapizo
3 жыл бұрын
I actually searched it up lol
@boualengdouavangthao5262
3 жыл бұрын
H. And
@seantaggart7382
3 жыл бұрын
@@marrakesh_3589 *Glare* (Careful on impact there's an idiot here) (On it)
@scarface1367
3 жыл бұрын
@Shawn Esquilona it is dedication
@manesiaphuto367
3 жыл бұрын
L
1:28 thank god the camera guy survived
@wiwbssjh8233
4 жыл бұрын
Lol
@massib4523
4 жыл бұрын
it was a drone
@shridhars1821
4 жыл бұрын
hhahahaaaa
@thechlebek901
4 жыл бұрын
@@massib4523 no, he typed sv_cheats 1 1 and was in noclip stop making jokes about dangerous jobs he almost died
@williampercival7662
4 жыл бұрын
These weapons of distruction are only good for killing ourselves, that's human intelligence. William Percival New Zealand Gardenia Band 🇨🇰 Kia Orana
As of 2022, the Russian ship in this video is now a submarine.
Love it when LM shows a realistic render even using competitor's F/A 18 to support the realistic. Great.
Is this on steam?
@ashwanishahrawat4607
5 жыл бұрын
Well played :D
@f22rhaptor
5 жыл бұрын
Actually in Arma 3 some mods make this possible
@phalcon23
5 жыл бұрын
You want DCS... its an actual simulator.
@IvanNava
5 жыл бұрын
Ace Combat 7
@4ries2209
5 жыл бұрын
Ace Combat 7 is vr games, cant afford VR
Ace combat fans: Hey,I've seen this one before
@mystyle_jm8997
4 жыл бұрын
Land-Attack Cruise Missile? Superior than LAGM and LASM as a combination between Damage Output and Blast Radius.
@viruspter1dactl
3 жыл бұрын
True on my channel i play ac7
@viruspter1dactl
3 жыл бұрын
@@mystyle_jm8997 NO LSAM
@thebuddy4517
3 жыл бұрын
Lockheed Martin=gründer industries
@scarface1367
3 жыл бұрын
@@thebuddy4517 wait, that actually makes sense
Two Neptune are enough.
Have you seen this after Moskva sunk?
@vsyokhoroshoy
Жыл бұрын
It not sunk,it turn into submarine
@tobyw9573
Жыл бұрын
@@vsyokhoroshoy Several subs, I expect.
When AWACS Longcaster says "Counteract enemy CIWS with a low approach or use missiles outside of intercept range"
@freyawion5337
3 жыл бұрын
Both. Both is good.
@karmavisuals3645
3 жыл бұрын
Longcaster says that while casually eating
@yaboikungpowfuckfinger7697
3 жыл бұрын
Lunchcaster*
@Panchoproductions2069
2 жыл бұрын
True
@sillylittleowlguy2392
2 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah, it’s Gripen time
Me at 3 AM: I need sleep. Also me: hehe long range missile go b o o m
@sarahsolari628
3 жыл бұрын
better: POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
4:16 hey, thats the moskwa Lockheed Martin already knew it 2016
1:22 The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
@Matthias-fk5md
Ай бұрын
Genau so funktioniert das. Blöd nur daß die Dinger 9 mal langsamer sind als russische Raketen.
You forgot to turn on RTX
@Phenom98
5 жыл бұрын
The missile would travel at just 50% of the speed if u turn that shit on.
@Anderson_Hwang
4 жыл бұрын
missile would travel at 30 fps only
@drixan563
4 жыл бұрын
What RTX means??
@Anderson_Hwang
4 жыл бұрын
@@drixan563 Ray tracing, a technology that traces light in real time, its on NVIDIA graphics cards and somehow became a meme
@OctogonOxygen024816
4 жыл бұрын
@@Anderson_Hwang is it hard on the graphics card or something?
amazing how much length we go to blow each other up
@rock3tcatU233
3 жыл бұрын
I know, awesome right?
@NOU-iw3gb
3 жыл бұрын
@@zeffez8161 "Sad" lmao. Stfu cupcake
@belgianfried
3 жыл бұрын
@@NOU-iw3gb If you had not chosen to use slang words like "stfu" and "lmao", maybe I would've taken you seriously. Grow up, idiotic youth.
@Homunculus144
3 жыл бұрын
@@belgianfried those arent words nor are they slang
@FungalumisBush
3 жыл бұрын
@@zeffez8161 if you think about it, with how dangerous the us is, people probably wont fight us. All the nations know that if nuclear war broke out, humanity would go extinct. I feel that despite all the hate we have for eachother, we all still agree on to not wipe ourselves out.
Update 2022, Moskva ship number 121 have sink in black sea.
But Moskva sank yesterday, by 2 Neptun.
Lockheed letting the enemy know what to expect so they can develope a counter measure
@MrCoolguy425
3 жыл бұрын
If the enemy didn’t know what to expect before this video went up, I don’t think we need to worry about development of anything, let alone a countermeasure.
@tollevkvendbo
3 жыл бұрын
@@MrCoolguy425 'the enemy' being?
@overlord4404
3 жыл бұрын
If this is the best they can offer then "the enemy" has nothing to worry about
@MrCoolguy425
3 жыл бұрын
@@tollevkvendbo the enemy being anyone. If Any nation that wants to develop a countermeasure to this, didn’t know about the weapons development itself before this video went up, through various methods, then they likely are not a nation that would have the ability to develop a countermeasure to it.
@munk_ken
3 жыл бұрын
How else to you get new contracts?
It's amazing how good those computers onboard the missile need to be.
@yotamxo
3 жыл бұрын
got the rtx
@Panchoproductions2069
2 жыл бұрын
16gb ram
@jmcglockYT
2 жыл бұрын
AMD 9
@sussy9278
2 жыл бұрын
420 ram
@user-mb6os4ml9u
2 жыл бұрын
导弹搭在的cpu运算性能实际真不算高。。
spoiler:you don't need three lrasm to sink a slava class cruiser
@Ryan_Christopher
2 жыл бұрын
Well technically it was two missiles for the cruiser, and one for the destroyer.
@huafu7639
2 жыл бұрын
Just need a strom and rain lol
Lockheed Martin predicted the demise of the moskva 6 years ago😂
if you can do it in Kerbal Space Program... it will work in the real world of course.
@emielsnoeijers
8 жыл бұрын
BD armory mod is the best! XD
@peqbox
8 жыл бұрын
Lol
@artwingtonr.4647
8 жыл бұрын
I never know how to use the BD armory cruise missile.
@mansoorsandhue4682
7 жыл бұрын
+KingKL h
@PaiSAMSEN
7 жыл бұрын
Set GPS coordinate, assign it to the missile, then assign a key to launch your missile, or simply right click on it, then select "fire".
So that's what the highest graphics setting looks like
@Aryan-iv5kt
5 жыл бұрын
Call Of Duty Modern Warfare : 2026
@vaclavmalecek2917
4 жыл бұрын
Man he was lucky af ngl
@thechlebek901
4 жыл бұрын
*water fiziks*
@erichschneider4759
3 жыл бұрын
Battlefield 8
It's just. This really needs to be in 4k. Hello from 2023.
This video has aged like fine wine. Keep up the fight, Ukraine!
Imagine all that machines hard work and calculations for nothing because some big ass bird accidentally hit it out of the sky😂
@lorentzcoffin4957
3 жыл бұрын
million dollar missile vs Albatross
@vicmic7936
3 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@PySnek
3 жыл бұрын
the enemy has also countermeasures and will shoot the LRASM down
@dylankolby5450
3 жыл бұрын
@@PySnek no no no..... It's American, remember?
@PriceTheCourier
3 жыл бұрын
@@PySnek Well, I think this Missile is much harder to detect so before they know it. It's already too late.
this is actually very exciting to watch. the tension constantly builds to the boiling point until the perfect climax and happy end. serious topic, but this definitely makes for an entertaining presentation.
@JamesWitte
8 ай бұрын
Orgasmic war porn you mean
Lol Neptune got the kill first, sorry guys. 🤣🤣
Bye bye Moskva. Give the graphic design team a raise lol.
@osvaldomedina2577
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly..😊😊😊.......the graph is from Moskva, fuck you Putin
meanwhile red CIWS: "am i joke to you?"
@jeffreyprezalar220
3 жыл бұрын
Not that the ciws is a joke but these missles supposedly almost triple the stealth profile of f22 and in thei final attack phase they are wave riders.
@LMaudy
3 жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyprezalar220 wanted to point that out
@w_elder2199
3 жыл бұрын
@Ee 3D lol same shit bruh
@MotoControlRu
3 жыл бұрын
@Ee 3D They got nothing on modern ones. Modern russian cruisers sink themselves.
@FarizTrinidad
3 жыл бұрын
ciwis lol
1 beautiful movie filmed 2 money taken 3 received bonuses 4 went to drink vodka and dreaming about bonuses 5 supply to the army, what the fuck the army, better show our rocket in the next Iron Man
Lockheed Martin is the best and most important defense corporation that we have. And Skunkworks makes the sexiest aircraft to ever exist!
@harttraveller
Жыл бұрын
this is what r/noncredibledefense does to a mf
I thought this was a WarThunder video based on the thumbnail, nope Lockheed Martin
Lmao i love how they use a russian destroyer as the target 😂😂😂😂
@user-tv2tm8gp9e
4 жыл бұрын
How did you know it is russian?!!
@thatlithuanianboi6812
4 жыл бұрын
@@user-tv2tm8gp9e whole ship looks like Slava class, which is - indeed Russian
@tonyfortier8835
4 жыл бұрын
Weapons manufacturers dream for a war with Russia. You can't make money when you're not at war when you make weapons
@ryanchuabowen2045
3 жыл бұрын
The US's enemy is Russia. This ads prob catered to US officials, so why not?
@tonyfortier8835
3 жыл бұрын
@@ryanchuabowen2045 it certainly isnt catered To average joes like you and me my friend. And acquiring an fighter jet isn't as easy as buying a pack of gum !
I asked my wife a couple of those for Christmas, but she told me to try and be nicer with the neighbour instead.
And actually Moskva sank with two missiles
@tuphan4134
2 жыл бұрын
Ukraine high command never confirm they shoot it, only the mayor of the city say it, do you guys really believe in that propanganda ?
@k1tsun386
2 жыл бұрын
@@ntf5211 Nimitz was older than the Moskva and still in service
@kadendookie178
Жыл бұрын
Was sunk by a missile system inferior to this
This is prophetic irony at its finest lmfao
@tracym8952
2 жыл бұрын
Provided to you by the time traveling wizards at skunkworks
@burroaks7
Жыл бұрын
@@tracym8952 I am a satisfied taxpayer lmao
@AntonGudenus
5 сағат бұрын
Down to the hull number actually
Cute cartoon, but In the REAL WORLD, the Rooskies will actually make an effort to defend themselves.
@TheInfamousMrFox
5 жыл бұрын
They'll try, sure. But they're 2 decades behind the west in technology, hence them losing a ground war to Ukraine. Then there's the fact they have an economy worth less than Italy which really hampers both development of new tech and their ability to field any significant number of anything even vaguely advanced.
@williamalm9603
5 жыл бұрын
that is not really true, they have a lot of gear that is advanced enough to fight war. especially on the army side. The tanks and infantry fighting vehicles are good. and so is the anti air. That is a thing that is often forgotten. a A10 is no use without air superiority.
@lukasvtipil9951
5 жыл бұрын
In matter of defending against anti ship missiles is russia actually in front of Nato. In reality two or three asm are no problem for rusian cwis if they have the best cwis (probably the kashtan cwis)
@heyhoe168
5 жыл бұрын
Well, Russia is quite good at drawing propaganda anime too.
@williamalm9603
5 жыл бұрын
the thing is. you never drop two or three from the same direction. You dop ten from different direktions (if you know that you can not over load the system) by that i mean that you send enough missiles to brake though the defenses. That is the Russian doctrine. They know that the Aegis system is too good to fool with a small amount of missiles so they try to overrun it.
Brilliant engineering, the terminal altitude adjustment will really help the missiles dodge SAM threats and Anti-missile threats.
@ee-ef8qr
9 ай бұрын
It does that by dodging radar.
Life imitates art, The Orc Ship "Moskva" has been sunk 😂
@12LoLproductions
Жыл бұрын
Moskva may be lost, but Varyag and Marshal Ustinov live on
@loganmacneil3424
Жыл бұрын
@@12LoLproductions Not for long lol
@thechlebek901
Жыл бұрын
@@12LoLproductions live on to also be lost to "a storm"
Slava class... Thanks for helping Lockheed to get the contract. lol.
I love how people make comments regarding the USA and Russia and blah blah blah, without realizing two things: 1. The video is from a _Company_ trying to sell their product to the US Military, not from the Govt. itself, making this an _ad_ and not Govt. "propaganda"; _and_ 2. The video never claims the hostile group is the Russian military The most you can claim is that the hostile group's tech may be Russian, but nothing about it being the Russian military/nation. (Russia also sells their tech to other regimes.)
@MrWizardjr9
5 жыл бұрын
yep they were obviously the british
@code-dredd
5 жыл бұрын
john li Yep, you're obviously missing the point.
@nordnic4572
5 жыл бұрын
LOOK WHAT TYPE OF HELICOPTER SITS ON THE SAG DESTROYER.
@sooprcoomr4828
5 жыл бұрын
So they don't have to blow up powerful ships that are not made by the US or its allies (which they might supply weapons to), and still, make it look nice. If they really want to be that "unbiased" they can use "texture missing" blobs and instantly become memes of the decade - or mess around with somebody OBVIOUSLY not buying their expensive missles.
@RU-zm7wj
5 жыл бұрын
The ad shows detailed features of the target ship which are unmistakably Russian-the rocket launchers and close in weapon systems are EASILY identifiable.
Already used them on the PTS. Great addition to the game.
And it happened in real life in 2022! according to Ukraine. But Naptune instead of LARSAM.
is this the Moskva? ... lol XD
@Skiesaremine
2 жыл бұрын
Same class anyways.
@MironSmithX
2 жыл бұрын
same hull number at 4:18
@AntonGudenus
5 сағат бұрын
Yep... the hull number and ship type match. As does being sunk by the impact of 2 anti-ship missiles.
Can I have one?
@dongchankim2417
5 жыл бұрын
I know you've been nice this year, but US couldn't trust you yet...so, sorry, not for now...
@ulgrinscpguvenligi4868
5 жыл бұрын
Nuke
@drivethru7565
5 жыл бұрын
No you cant
@LuftUberSoldat
5 жыл бұрын
Wait for secreat santa for this year May be U got the chance with armed one
@blazingfox2913
5 жыл бұрын
Never
Nice animation; Does it actually work?
@jayyoutube8790
8 жыл бұрын
It sure dose.. In fact, their is a lot more to it than what was shown, but it was classified.. That's where the magic happens
@bonkersblock
8 жыл бұрын
You should give Lockheed the coordinates of your house and tell them to use LRASM to find out if it works??😂
@docark3224
8 жыл бұрын
Hahaha.... soo true.
@marconius101
8 жыл бұрын
If the other party, sleeps, doesn't look and is totally incapable. Yeah sure...
@jayyoutube8790
8 жыл бұрын
They would never see it comming..
These are cool. I might buy a couple
@Neoclixs69420
4 ай бұрын
same
OK, this video needs remastered ASAP! Change the Slava into 055, or nobody will buy the LRASM!😂
A lot really depends upon how many weapons you can deploy against each vessel. A single missile would likely have little chance but multiple threats become more difficult to deal with.
@Tounguepunchfartbox
Жыл бұрын
Whole point of this system is to mitigate that. Instead of 10, you gave good chances with 1 or 2.
@godmode8687
Жыл бұрын
I Guess that depends on how modern your enemy is. Google About how bad russian and sovjet designs were for the usability. Chances are high the one ukrainian missile for example was detected as a dot on the rader. And had the Operator been at 100% easily been neutralized. But sovjet design never was optimised for user experience. And that is importans as fatigue makes all Radar etc useless otherwise. So many missiles van either be better as they overwhelm the enemy, or worse as they alert the enemy sooner so he van start countermeasures.
@atroxiv
Жыл бұрын
Don't worry, we've fixed this problem and are now going to drop 10 or so of them out of a cargo plane using a pallet system, completely saturating 1 or more targets.
That animation was absolutely amazing!
These offer so much utility, bought one for my wife and she loves it.
This feels awfully like an actual teaser for a movie.
4:33 Osean XO Fleet : " Captain! We've just lost ship 3 and 4! We're taking heavy damage!" Osean Captain Fleet : "it's like this monster is toying with us out there, we've got to do something"
new warthunder update looks fire!
@TheGlitch93
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah bro, New smoke and exhaust effects
Pick a stormy day with aid of targeting measure and let it fly. Up yours Ruski
Amazing !!! I remember using a flight Sim in the 1990s flying a Raptor and using LRASM and MRASM missiles. If they work they are a fantastic weapon !!! It seems we are on a runaway train to WW3 and we will need every smart weapon we can get to beat Russia, China and North Korea combined !!!!
@user-bf1rk1tv3i
2 жыл бұрын
И Россия, Китай и Северная Корея в течение 25 минут сделают США съёмочной площадкой для фильмов про марсианские пустыни😁
@AlexeyMironchenkowoodgoblin
2 жыл бұрын
@@user-bf1rk1tv3i Не забывай, ядреная война очень жестока. И у НАТО после глобального обмена останутся силы и авиаразведка, чтобы сделать Россию действительно необитаемой до Урала. Я не думаю, что в России этого хотят. Особенно когда у самой России меньше десятка птичек, способных разведывать США, а оптических вообще две и это количество не будет увеличиваться.
@user-bf1rk1tv3i
2 жыл бұрын
@@AlexeyMironchenkowoodgoblin а кто сказал, что нато будет что-то делать после уничтожения сша?
@user-bf1rk1tv3i
2 жыл бұрын
@@AlexeyMironchenkowoodgoblin не забывай прятаться в подвале. Кстати, мы рассматриваем конфликт НАТО vs ОДКБ+КНР, так что сил хватит
@user-yx8tn8ls5u
2 жыл бұрын
@@user-bf1rk1tv3i во-первых, даже если допустить что половина из 5к боеголовок рф + 300 боеголокок КНР куда-то именно в Штатах долетят -- уничтожить их полностью не получится, и именно по причинам, которые я заявил. Невозможность доразведки и уничтожения целей о итогам первых ударов. У КНР с этим, может, немного получше чем у рф, но ничего не заменит авиаразведку, которой смогут заниматься НАТО в РФ, но не смогут ни КНР, ни РФ. У НАТО же, напротив, есть мобильная морская составляющая, уничтожить которую полностью в такой короткий срок, который будет отведен при глобальном обмене, не представляется возможным. Она-то и будет заниматься именно уничтожением всего, включая население, потому что ядерные удары будут нанесены и по мирняку и там уже далее стесняться нечего. Подумай об этом, когда будешь что-то тявкать про уничтожение, ты ж сам, дурак, не выживешь, и страна твоя. Практически единственные, кто гарантированно будет уничтожен.
The military: we need a new gun Lockheed Martin :
Why is the comment section full of “military geniuses”?
@Pwnzistor
5 жыл бұрын
Everyone on the internet thinks they know everything.
@fate-csgoandmore6185
5 жыл бұрын
literally every other comment section
@chingghishan5707
5 жыл бұрын
A JET THAT SHOOTS ANOTHER JET?!?!? OWO?!?!?!?
@lamao2504
5 жыл бұрын
Surely they asked google...
@miksuko
5 жыл бұрын
@@Pwnzistor definitely not everyone. Kinda ironic that you say that and are wrong like that.
I'm here after Moskva went into a special anti-submarine operation in the Black Sea
funny how the Moskva shown here is now under the waves
@tracym8952
2 жыл бұрын
Indeed it is very funny. Hopefully the same happens to china's type 003 if there's a conflict
Super realistic footage. I got seasick from all the random camera pans, such a perfect simulation of sailor life!
Love how the mode change animation sound is the same as the fasten seat belt sign audio alert in most airlines.
well, sinking the moskva with a u.s missile, this aged well...
@scarblix7959
Жыл бұрын
@A Perpetual Guardsman with a flashlight based
This is way over my head; from when I was in the Navy!
These videos are put together better than some others on KZread, I wouldn't expect that coming out of a military company
new war thunder update looks great, I hope F-18E(LRASM) is not premium)))
@vnyggi621
4 жыл бұрын
@isrgntv _ Superhornet? Maybe in 20 years
1. Holy fuck this animation is god tier 2. Bold of them to assume that their CIWS are working.
ukraine's neptune proved that it handle hostile surface action group as well
@tracym8952
2 жыл бұрын
Indeed it did. I don't think the neptune even costs 4 million dollars either. Slava ukraine
Got to love this company :) Share prices keep rising & order book filled
Great, I'm sure Russia really liked this. A video demonstrating a new missile, and their ships were used.
@MrDuckie00
8 жыл бұрын
Nobody messes with the U.S. Navy were coming for you
@monsta1359
8 жыл бұрын
Who cares, Russia does the same thing when doing a virtual demonstration.
@user-qd8yl9eq4r
8 жыл бұрын
russian have some nukes tho
@BlakeC94
8 жыл бұрын
Russia does not. They will never be militarily better than the US. End of...
@crimsonstang
8 жыл бұрын
+The South 803 that's not entirely true.
Realty just showed us that once been blinded by a preliminary drone attack, battle ships are absolutely unprotected against such attacks.
@TerryTerius
2 жыл бұрын
That was mostly because the radar they had couldn’t look in all directions at once. Rather than being a general weakness of modern ships. So once the Ukrainians distracted their limited radar, they had no ability to tell those missiles were incoming.
@sunrisejackdaw1779
Жыл бұрын
@@TerryTerius It's a bit like getting someone's attention with a flare and then throwing a grenade at them while they are distracted.
"The missile knows where it is at all times... It knows where it id because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it isn't from where it is, or where it is from where it isn't, whichever is greater, it obtain a different, also known as deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error."
Subsonic ASM is like bringing a prop plane to a jet dogfight.
@AccordGTR
8 жыл бұрын
even f they r stealth?
@Peichen01
8 жыл бұрын
+Nico Montinola Even if they are stealth as Goalkeeper and similar CIWS in Russia and China's arsenal have multiband radar and optical tracking. A slow flying missile just mean it will give CIWS more time to track and engage.
@benitollan
8 жыл бұрын
high supersonic at sea level? yeah right. Not at sea level then? OK let's be detected at very long distance. Supersonic seaskimming? instantaneous detection when it pops up over the horizon. Subsonic seaskimming? less probability of fast detection after popping up over the horizon. Weapons shit is classified, how do we now it doesn't have supersonic terminal speed and/or other measures? Oh yeah because it's easy to assume ridiculously high wage weapons engineers and strategists are stupid.
@ThomasWilliamsLewis
8 жыл бұрын
Finally someone who knows what they are talking about.
@2020Max1
8 жыл бұрын
If you are relying on CIWS to shoot down incoming missiles you have already lost the engagement. CIWS is the last line of defense and in most cases still results in damage to the target ship even if the CIWS successfully hits the incoming missile.
So pretty much kamikaze drones that can be launched from aircraft I like it
@jamespulford3892
5 жыл бұрын
How are thy kamikaze nothing to do with that
@Kuro_2712
5 жыл бұрын
@@jamespulford3892 r/wooosh
@meinfraulein380
5 жыл бұрын
Ohka
This was informative, educational as well as entertainment!
Outstanding video, LM! 💛🙏🏽
"The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't."
World War III with Russia? Fuck yeah!
Haha! A Slava class cruiser? When fiction becomes reality.
@burroaks7
2 жыл бұрын
check out it's hull number lmfao
성지순례왔습니다 전교1등하게 해주세요