LLinusLLove | Getting Thin Value | GTO Analysis

Ойындар

Pio solver analysis of Triton Super High Roller No Limit Hold Em Hand Between LLinus LLove and Steve Odwyer
Tools:
www.piosolver.com/
rangeconverter.com/ (use ISITGTO for 10% off)
#LlinusLLove #piosolver #GTO

Пікірлер: 181

  • @conormcleod5900
    @conormcleod59005 жыл бұрын

    raising those top pair no kicker for info. Those fishes back in the day had it right since the beginning!

  • @Gos1234567

    @Gos1234567

    5 жыл бұрын

    Turns out donk betting is a big AI thing aswell.

  • @ukrobochips8817

    @ukrobochips8817

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@Gos1234567 So is open limping :o

  • @marlboro1771

    @marlboro1771

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@ukrobochips8817 And min-raising from utg.

  • @ukrobochips8817

    @ukrobochips8817

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@marlboro1771 But that's been standard practice for years hasn't it?

  • @Psiber_Syn
    @Psiber_Syn5 жыл бұрын

    Great concept for a poker channel. Looking forward to all future content.

  • @privychanneldavy
    @privychanneldavy5 жыл бұрын

    What a great video. Please make more of these, I think solvers are fascinating and your analysis is excellent.

  • @justinmarchesan9752
    @justinmarchesan97525 жыл бұрын

    Loved the hand choice and Solver Analysis, well done!

  • @davidmurff540
    @davidmurff5405 жыл бұрын

    Really enjoyed this hand breakdown. It’s refreshing and comes from a different angle as you said. Looking forward to more.

  • @THEGLORYRISING
    @THEGLORYRISING5 жыл бұрын

    I just found my favourite channel on KZread! This stuff is $$$$ in my pocket. Thankyou!!!!!

  • @jacobcadena9345
    @jacobcadena93454 жыл бұрын

    Wow, going back and watching this your production and presentation value has grown immensely. Nice work. This is still an interesting video, but your current work is light years ahead. Good job.

  • @mekanarazmedov1786
    @mekanarazmedov17865 жыл бұрын

    Please,keep these videos coming. You are about to blow up. Great stuff.

  • @peterbrottman7187
    @peterbrottman71875 жыл бұрын

    Saw it. loved it, subbed it! Since I haven't got Pio yet, this is, for me, by far the most giving experience regarding GTO play. Keep it up, you're doing a really great work here :)

  • @1337KoRn
    @1337KoRn5 жыл бұрын

    Linus recently finished Negreanu's Masterclass.

  • @justletmesigninokthx

    @justletmesigninokthx

    5 жыл бұрын

    ... he now understands that everything he does at the poker table conveys information.

  • @lozgod

    @lozgod

    5 жыл бұрын

    He definitely isn’t sitting there loosey goosey eating a sandwich. He’s really sticking to the core strategy.

  • @peacefulbuddha8361

    @peacefulbuddha8361

    5 жыл бұрын

    I don't think trolling Daniel for that pathetic advert will ever get old. I laugh out loud for a min. every time I see it. Cheers!

  • @Gos1234567

    @Gos1234567

    5 жыл бұрын

    lozgod the sandwich industry are not happy with that advice.

  • @lozgod

    @lozgod

    5 жыл бұрын

    gerry o sullivan Wonder Bread has pulled all of their Danny Negraneu endorsements. They now sponsor Phil Ivey who’s masterclass doesn’t attempt to shame the sandwich industry.

  • @RAtZ133
    @RAtZ1335 жыл бұрын

    You should upload new videos at a higher frequency 😁

  • @johnyl6926
    @johnyl69265 жыл бұрын

    Cool channel and video (Y) You can select 'square size to proportional weight' so that all the starting range isn't in your turn and river range, it gives a better overview of the range that goes post-flop. Thanks and gl

  • @collinbourke4211
    @collinbourke42115 жыл бұрын

    This is a great format, keep them coming please!

  • @Englocked
    @Englocked3 жыл бұрын

    10:19 The solver never makes minus ev plays, mixed strategies means all lines have the same ev, in this case raising is 0 ev. You'll see the ev's converging as you let the solver run.

  • @williamrodriguez1736
    @williamrodriguez17365 жыл бұрын

    You def earned a subscriber after this video, more piosolver videos please !!!

  • @Pr0d0ta
    @Pr0d0ta5 жыл бұрын

    Ty so much for showing us how the solvers works.

  • @SB7G4
    @SB7G45 жыл бұрын

    I like this type of analysis, good video. Basically llinusllove played it perfectly

  • @lilianelasserbe1437
    @lilianelasserbe14375 жыл бұрын

    Nice! One recommendation: In the next video select the "square size proportional to weight" and "bars width proportional to weight" squares, so we can see the actual frequencies of the hands

  • @isuckatgaming7225
    @isuckatgaming72255 жыл бұрын

    This is gold mine content for those who cannot afford Pio... So thanks a lot, looking forward for more

  • @RafiVegasVlog

    @RafiVegasVlog

    5 жыл бұрын

    if you can't afford pio, you probably don't need pio ;)

  • @alexandervojdani9127

    @alexandervojdani9127

    5 жыл бұрын

    RafiVegas u aint got pio fam

  • @SimonasMorkunas

    @SimonasMorkunas

    3 жыл бұрын

    GTO+ has 99% features of Pio and costs 75$ ;)

  • @Fish-rm6nl

    @Fish-rm6nl

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@SimonasMorkunas looks like shit thou 🤣

  • @Shaggi0209
    @Shaggi02095 жыл бұрын

    Those guys studied the game so much that they can implement piosolver strategy in real time flawlessly. Super amazed.

  • @mrsalt548

    @mrsalt548

    5 жыл бұрын

    ist actuallly not so hard , just study 1 year 3 Hours a day

  • @PinchePerroMetiche

    @PinchePerroMetiche

    11 ай бұрын

    @@mrsalt548 that's very specific!

  • @niceguy3963
    @niceguy39634 жыл бұрын

    These videos are fantastic, keep them going

  • @ROBMrs
    @ROBMrs5 жыл бұрын

    What does pio say about ike not brushing his hands through his hair so he doesn't look like hes dripping in grease

  • @Tomasz_Siwiec
    @Tomasz_Siwiec5 жыл бұрын

    Nice one again, only two videos seen, but i already love Your channel and subbed. Cheers.

  • @jeweetzellufgeak
    @jeweetzellufgeak5 жыл бұрын

    KZread recommended this one, liked it a lot!

  • @igors7334
    @igors73345 жыл бұрын

    greate format man. respect. continue plz. good job

  • @davidfong7848
    @davidfong78485 жыл бұрын

    Great analysis. I think its important to note that what allows Linus to XR some marginal hands otf is the presence of the nutted hands (sets) in his range as well. He will also incorporate some nutted hands in his small river probing range to protect himself. You often see hands like oesd + flush draw Xing back IP and hands with similar equity, not because we are afraid of getting blown off our hand because those hands will never be folding. I think hands like this play better as BXB bluffs than 3barrel bluffs given we block so many draws and just prefer to realize equity

  • @kyedrageset4427
    @kyedrageset44275 жыл бұрын

    Some quality poker content! You got yourself a new subscriber

  • @TimeToChangeLife
    @TimeToChangeLife5 жыл бұрын

    thx for this content, mindblowing, looking forward for more :)

  • @xwilsting7147
    @xwilsting71475 жыл бұрын

    Great analysis! More please!

  • @seoultrain0
    @seoultrain05 жыл бұрын

    Great video - now I need to get a solver!

  • @OMC_Escher
    @OMC_Escher5 жыл бұрын

    Pio says O’Dwyer should bet pot because of the massive polarity in his range. When going into the range explorer you see he rarely has pairs but has tons of air and overpairs and sets which are the effective nut hands here. Such polarity warrants a large bet sizing. Love these videos though, motivated me to start my own solver work.

  • @bildrwic3
    @bildrwic35 жыл бұрын

    Very nice idea and good explanation. Loved to see the actual HD video cuts not a real time recording because it looks laggy and stuff. Cheers!

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    im going to try downloading the youtube vid per someone's suggestion

  • @st1nos
    @st1nos5 жыл бұрын

    great analysis! cool concept :)

  • @johngriller4997
    @johngriller49974 жыл бұрын

    Does the BB ante incentivize players to defend wider as opposed to traditional antes format?

  • @IronFist2508
    @IronFist25085 жыл бұрын

    Cool vid bro, nice analysis

  • @toomuchsauce1664
    @toomuchsauce16645 жыл бұрын

    More of the same please, good job!!👍

  • @bartvandenberg977
    @bartvandenberg9775 жыл бұрын

    Nice vid bro. Well explained. New sub

  • @woodstock37-
    @woodstock37-5 жыл бұрын

    I enjoyed this. Thanks

  • @callumross2799
    @callumross27995 жыл бұрын

    great analysis!

  • @420lefebvre
    @420lefebvre5 жыл бұрын

    Good video. You should click "square size proportional to weight" on the right side of the browser. It makes it easier to visualize an accurate range.

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks. Yes, I try to do more of that in later vids.

  • @xxxAlain
    @xxxAlain5 жыл бұрын

    At 6:50 we can see Linus range. Question: 43s bets 40% of the time, so we bet the ones without flush draw and check the ones with flush draw?! So we don´t get pushed off our equity? Or do we simply bet the Open ended flush draw ones, because we have more equity (so we would like to put more money with +EV) ? PS: O´Dwyer has to check a lot with the same draw on the turn in a similar spot

  • @jonymaka
    @jonymaka5 жыл бұрын

    Why does the solver make negative EV plays some percentage of the time?

  • @MonsterTVchannel
    @MonsterTVchannel5 жыл бұрын

    Great video. Subbed.

  • @tim9453
    @tim94535 жыл бұрын

    Awesome job

  • @fran-vb6ew
    @fran-vb6ew5 жыл бұрын

    amazing video thx!

  • @shijialiu2946
    @shijialiu29465 жыл бұрын

    great vid! keep it up

  • @mrsalt548
    @mrsalt5485 жыл бұрын

    love the vid, pls more Linus videos

  • @rverges23
    @rverges232 жыл бұрын

    What do you think about LL check/calling the river? Pick up more value. Is the bet preferred to avoid facing the overbet from the ip player? Obviously LL doesn't know the villains exact holding but when you arrive to the riv w JTh high he probably isn't checking J high back though in reality it sucks for the ip player because it's kind of the worst hand to have except for JT of diamonds due to blockers/removal. Do you think if the riv gets checked to the ipp he should still bluff?

  • @MrBJony
    @MrBJony5 жыл бұрын

    to understand the range better, I would advise to check the box - square size proportional to wight

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yeah thanks. I normally do but in later streets sometimes it becomes hard to see. I will try to keep that checked as much as possible.

  • @tedqu6802
    @tedqu68024 жыл бұрын

    Why you didn't use the same bet size as the players in Pio?

  • @nrgxgg
    @nrgxgg5 жыл бұрын

    Fastest I have ever subbed to a channel. 1 video watched.

  • @KKariu
    @KKariu5 жыл бұрын

    Great videos. Waiting for the next ones :) thanks a lot

  • @OsefKincaid
    @OsefKincaid5 жыл бұрын

    Is there another calculation that caused you to create those preflop ranges or is it just assumed? I'm very skeptical that K9o and J9o aren't defending, for example, but I'd love to be proven wrong.

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    I used pokersnowie which is known to be tighter than the general population.

  • @AndreasFroehliPoker
    @AndreasFroehliPoker5 жыл бұрын

    Well done! How can I PM you the best?

  • @straight_flizzy
    @straight_flizzy5 жыл бұрын

    Haven’t seen any channels like this, not there yet personally, but really cool to see what all of this solver business is about. #StayFlizzyMyFriends 😎

  • @JS-tm1gq
    @JS-tm1gq5 жыл бұрын

    Its a little strange having the T7o call but no j9-k9 I think the k7-8o and q7-8o can be ok polar 3bets at certain stack depths (not the 80bb effective. Here linear with some mixed board coverage suited connector/gapper and some axs makes more sense at this stack) to differing frequencies. Have you made all these combos as pure polar 3b? (The j7-j9, q7-q9 k7-k9?) You need to do something about this gaping leak in this preflop range and re do the sim

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yes Im trying to be more mindful of the opening ranges in later videos.

  • @raisethebar9188
    @raisethebar91885 жыл бұрын

    Great video

  • @diwakarmanghnani9649
    @diwakarmanghnani96495 жыл бұрын

    Great video. Shows how great both the players actually are.

  • @kylelooper2156
    @kylelooper21564 жыл бұрын

    I think it's really interesting how Linus's postflop skills allow him to play a very wide range in a lot of situations. The very large continuation bet on the flop followed by a lot of passive play from late position screams draw or weak made hand. A5hh is really about the only hand that got there on the river, and it's only one combo versus a ton of bluffs in button's range. I like Linus's play on every street, although my first inclination was to donk bet the flop because the flop hits the BB's range so much better than the button's. I block top set, and I expect overcards to fold out either on the flop or to a turn barrel. Thinking ahead though, what do I do if an Ace, King, or Queen hits the turn? Checking gives the button carte blanche to take the pot away. Check raising your continuing range seems like a better candidate, as it will often dissuade the button from being aggressive on any turn card that hits their range. In fact, the button hit the perfect card on the turn, which gave them a ton of added equity (in fact making them the favorite in the hand), but fearing 2 pr or a set, the button couldn't find the large bet to take the pot away.

  • @bartvandijk9906
    @bartvandijk99065 жыл бұрын

    So, if you play poker drunk it's gto??

  • @janus11
    @janus115 жыл бұрын

    Why a Hands like K9o, Q9o, J9o not in his BB callingrange, but hands like 96o and 107o are?

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    mistake!

  • @Sebastian-xl3kl
    @Sebastian-xl3kl3 жыл бұрын

    Linus river range in this video is the same as his preflop range so apparently something went wrong here with regards to prior action range adjustments.

  • @ivarbovarsson3440
    @ivarbovarsson34405 жыл бұрын

    thx for good video but I really think that LLinus is defending different range pre

  • @LTUharis93
    @LTUharis935 жыл бұрын

    god video, really enjoyed it, subscribed. Thank you.

  • @lozgod

    @lozgod

    5 жыл бұрын

    Haroldas B keep religion out of poker.

  • @LTUharis93

    @LTUharis93

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@lozgod lol first of all youre funny. 2nd I meant to say ''good video'' Mister grammar nazi.

  • @AzEsm...
    @AzEsm...5 жыл бұрын

    Good analysis. Keep doing them. P.S. On th river Linus bet, but not raise as you said in video.

  • @JS-tm1gq
    @JS-tm1gq5 жыл бұрын

    Also whats going on with the bet size? You say steve pot cbets but the image shows 3k into 13k for ~25% Nanonoko appears to be talking that the bet size is small and if steve should size it up You say linus check raises small but its 9.5x the 3k bet size to 28 (1.5x pot) which is massive Are the graphics all wrong or am i missing something. Edit: nanonoko says the graphic is wrong and steve bet bigger. Was it 13k cb and checkraise to 28k?

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    I think the graphic was an error for the flop bet. It later corrects to show a full pot size bet by Steve.

  • @RajatKumar-sr5kg
    @RajatKumar-sr5kg5 жыл бұрын

    I think you should add more hands in Llinus BB defend range!

  • @m.pirone1774
    @m.pirone17744 жыл бұрын

    congrats

  • @aaronl1186
    @aaronl11865 жыл бұрын

    Why did you speculate that LLinus might of checked back 96o if he was playing IP? Would your opinion change if they were playing cash instead of tournament? I think LLinus may very well have checked back a hand like 96o because the risk-reward ratio of block bet/thin-value vs. re-opening action vs good villain in a tournament favours it but I reckon he'll probably bet a stronger 9x (K9+) IP even at the risk of re-opening the action

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    My speculation was really just a guess. I know Linus makes these types of bets frequently and I've always speculated that they are more block bets than value, but I've also seen him call a huge raise in the face of his block bet, which I think leans towards value? I do know that Pio seems to treat small bet and check OOP almost the same in terms of EV but that's not the case often times IP.

  • @aaronl1186

    @aaronl1186

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@FindingEquilibrium Thanks for your reply. Yeah, I've also seen him call-down raises OTR in response to his block/small VB - its absolutely necessary if small/block bet OTR is part of your strategy and when you're playing against opponents who bluff raises (as part of their defence) enough. Do you think he would play it differently IP in a tournament generally vs. CG table though?

  • @brenobissoli1814
    @brenobissoli18145 жыл бұрын

    realy nice video

  • @timkavanaugh6474
    @timkavanaugh64743 жыл бұрын

    Awesome

  • @Nicolas-en8ko
    @Nicolas-en8ko5 жыл бұрын

    Man just Throw away flop donk Very good work btw 🤓😎

  • @Diesel-gp2zz
    @Diesel-gp2zz5 жыл бұрын

    i don't understand anything of these solvers, how can i learn that ??

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    My next video will be a tutorial on PIO. stay tuned!

  • @DottMySaviour
    @DottMySaviour Жыл бұрын

    At 8:40, it seems like GTO is never betting 1/4 pot with Trips or better. Isn't that exploitable? Is GTO saying that O'dwyer should never have too many Trips or better when Linus bet 1/4 pot?

  • @JeffBoski
    @JeffBoski5 жыл бұрын

    MOAR VIDEOS!

  • @heyjas0n
    @heyjas0n5 жыл бұрын

    I’m still confused about why Dwyer should check behind the turn. I play $50nl online and in Dwyers shoes I would just go ahead and bet the turn thinking BB was just messing around or “seeing where he’s at” and giving up on the turn and I could get him to fold a 9x type hand or just his junk and I can deny equity. I wouldn’t expect 50nl population to ever go for the x/r flop, x/r turn as a bluff so if that were to happen I would fold. Perhaps at these stakes things are different so Dwyer doesn’t want to get blown off his hand.

  • @volcommerce
    @volcommerce5 жыл бұрын

    do you make these vids regularly, new sub, i play every day - looking for a high qualty hand analysis channel

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks. I am going to try for 1 per week.

  • @anyu8109

    @anyu8109

    5 жыл бұрын

    can I ask what's the game are you playing? 1/3 or 10/20?

  • @martinminchev9037
    @martinminchev90375 жыл бұрын

    Wow this guys are playing like PIO solver, seems they're working reaaaaalllyyyy hard.

  • @polloymedio

    @polloymedio

    5 жыл бұрын

    Likewise! Hope to see more of these videos

  • @kdsajrf
    @kdsajrf5 жыл бұрын

    I dont understand why he didnt check the river? that way he could of called any bluffs from Odwyer

  • @Romans8-9

    @Romans8-9

    5 жыл бұрын

    My guess is he thinks his hand is not strong enough to bluff catch. He gets to dictate the price also and can credibly have some 5x in his range so it makes it hard for him to get raised for value.

  • @vaibhavtemani8504

    @vaibhavtemani8504

    4 жыл бұрын

    Thin value betting 》bluffcatching...if he goes for check call river line, dyer also checks back his med strength hands..and only raises polarized..so not much value in that..

  • @gman86
    @gman865 жыл бұрын

    very nice video! don't you think llinus is also defending K9 Q9 and J9 off suited? probably any suited too but maybe it's my perception. i just subscribed, props!

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks. Yes, looking back at it, I think the assumed calling range was too tight. Linus seemed to be calling almost any two cards in the BB probably bc of the ante plus he knows he has post-flop advantage against pretty much anyone. I got the preflop range from pokersnowie and actually adjusted it to be a bit wider, but probably didn't make it wide enough.

  • @jjprodigyify

    @jjprodigyify

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yes, def defending those, and whole solve becomes irrelevant, because IP player has clear range advantage when OOP is missing that many strong 9x. Turn plays may be entirely different etc.

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Irrelevant seems like an overstatement. Would it be that different? Seems like the solver strategy differs significantly when the concentration/percentage of strong hands changes, not just when the raw number of strong hands change. Even with more 9s BB will still have a ton of air. If your BB range is 100% that means you have total coverage and all possible nut hands, but your range is still weak.

  • @jjprodigyify

    @jjprodigyify

    5 жыл бұрын

    In short: yes, it would be very different. I'm not really interested in teaching general public how to play or use tools for free though

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Idk. There are still many 9s in the range so it seems like it shouldn't be too different, especially since if you start adding more 9s you will also have to add more air, but maybe you are right. I may rerun the analysis later with a wider range when I have more time. Thanks for the feedback.

  • @peacefulbuddha8361
    @peacefulbuddha83615 жыл бұрын

    I would be interested to know if LL would play this way if he sat in an average 2-5 game and if these solver strats work up against non solver strats. I imagine if I made a habit of calling a checkraise on 9xx with JT bdfd in a 200 dollar tourney in Daytona Beach, my stories would not be turned into song by many wandering minstrels.

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    I have for a long time thought it would be a great idea for a top pro to just sit down at a random 1-2 or 2-5 game and video tape it.

  • @xxxAlain

    @xxxAlain

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@FindingEquilibrium At 6:50 we can see Linus range. Question: 43s bets 40% of the time, so we bet the ones without flush draw and check the ones with flush draw?! So we don´t get pushed off our equity? Or do we simply bet the Open ended flush draw ones, because we have more equity (so we would like to put more money with +EV) ? PS: O´Dwyer has to check a lot with the same draw on the turn in a similar spot

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    That's a good question - I would have to rerun the analysis, but my guess is that with the additional equity of combo draw on the turn the solver will continue betting after check raising on the flop. But that being said, I think with most draws, you really can't be too -EV regardless of which option you choose.

  • @nohalfmeasures6
    @nohalfmeasures65 жыл бұрын

    LLinusLLove the current Endboss.

  • @Timmevds
    @Timmevds5 жыл бұрын

    Love the video, but please keep in mind that one can only raise if a bet has gone in before that. Linus didn't raise 17k on the river, he simply bet 17k on the river

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yes, pretty sure I made a few of these flubs. My first video!

  • @jamesevans2507

    @jamesevans2507

    5 жыл бұрын

    lmfao I'm sure this guy learnt to use pio but doesn't know the difference between bet and raise, glad you explained it to him.

  • @patriciofalotico1940
    @patriciofalotico19405 жыл бұрын

    Reg nl 25 (for now) here, linus legend, im sub good video. Btw Wich version you use of piosolver? In gonna try the free version but I don't know what it has

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks. I only have basic at the moment, but will probably upgrade at some point.

  • @patriciofalotico1940

    @patriciofalotico1940

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@FindingEquilibrium you try the free version?

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    No - I think its quite limited. If you are serious about learning GTO I would just suggest getting the basic version.

  • @D1G1TALFOX
    @D1G1TALFOX5 жыл бұрын

    T H X . . . спасибо царит хаос 🦊 😎 ♚

  • @synchronium24
    @synchronium245 жыл бұрын

    10:10 "The solver will actually raise some of the time as a bluff, but that's actually a negative EV play." I thought the solver (taking folding to be neutral EV) never made negative EV plays.

  • @JS-tm1gq

    @JS-tm1gq

    5 жыл бұрын

    These hands will boost the eV of the nutted hands more than it sacrifices of itself

  • @ivanbokhonko8712
    @ivanbokhonko87125 жыл бұрын

    Wtf with def bb range?

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    too tight, i know

  • @gonkuuu1
    @gonkuuu14 жыл бұрын

    I think Linus reraise 2x because O, Dwyer made a Pot-Size C bet aware of 3 bet possibility at this Board. i mean GTO shows that he would reraise a smaller C bet more often. So Linus 2x reraise seems like a port controlling move. In fact he shrinks O, Dwyer C-bet but he also loses fold equity for his bluff.

  • @Gos1234567

    @Gos1234567

    4 жыл бұрын

    Not exactly a bluff by Linus though was it,more a protection of his TP,But yes pio does recommend check raising more from OOP when the cbet is smaller,So a good thing to do with value hands would be to cbet smaller to induce cr bluffs?

  • @jasonisfamous6544
    @jasonisfamous65442 жыл бұрын

    how does someone so young play so methodically?

  • @polkallday
    @polkallday5 жыл бұрын

    great video!

  • @kashioh333
    @kashioh3335 жыл бұрын

    0:23 he seems to have seven yellow chips and six blue chips.(185k stack) 1:52 he bets three yellow chips? (red=1000, yellow=5000, blue=25000) 3:46 he seems to have five yellow chips... Did he really bet 13,000 on the flop? It looks like he has no red chip at this point. Linus raises to 28000, If O'Dwyer bets 15000 on the flop its less than minimum raise size. It's strange.

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Not sure of the exact chip counts or the bets. I was going off what the announcer said and then what the graphic displayed on turn and river.

  • @rooksman64

    @rooksman64

    5 жыл бұрын

    #Torelligate

  • @RR-cc8ck
    @RR-cc8ck5 жыл бұрын

    Actually the flop was 3 k bet into 13 k pot and Linus raised to 28 k.

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    I think that was an error in the graphic which was corrected later on.

  • @neelj2020
    @neelj20205 жыл бұрын

    Towards the end, you say that Linus is who he is because he managed to make the most chips in a marginal situation. However, taking the example of this very hand, if Linus check-called the flop, he would very likely be facing a big barrel on the turn as well, which he should definitely call. Therefore, we have now reached a river situation with a pot bigger than this, and the pairing of the board and bricking of draws doesn't encourage bluffs. Check-calling the flop would lead to a river situation where there's more chips in the middle, and Linus has a better hand. As long as he doesn't get outplayed, he's making more chips than by X/r the flop. Thoughts?

  • @Gos1234567

    @Gos1234567

    5 жыл бұрын

    I think the X/r on flop was to make over cards to his pair go away,also if he just x/calls flop then when an overcards falls its tricky for him,the Q came which O Dwyer would definetly bet at if Linus had X/call flop.He probably doesnt always play this the same way anyway as a good pro would never do

  • @davizilloh96
    @davizilloh965 жыл бұрын

    Mateos vs lodden ept hand pleeez

  • @Demondoink1
    @Demondoink15 жыл бұрын

    Use square size proportional to weight plz. Much easier to visualise weights etc

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yeah I realized I had it unchecked. I will try to switch back and forth so people can see the weights but also clearly see the range strategies as well.

  • @Demondoink1

    @Demondoink1

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@FindingEquilibrium cool sounds good. Nice video btw, first time watching you and subbed. More Linus hands plz :D

  • @icedragon109
    @icedragon1095 жыл бұрын

    fucking Llinus is such a BEAST god damn

  • @babbar3531
    @babbar35313 жыл бұрын

    are we not going to talk about randy lew's outdated poker hand breakdown analysis!

  • @docpio6465
    @docpio64655 жыл бұрын

    LLinus preflop range seems incorrect. He would probably defend any suited cards and more of the offsuit Kx, Qx, Jx. Also you forgot to add lower frequencies for those hands, he will frequently 3bet with preflop. Betting big on the flop, especially with JTs makes a lot of sense, since you fold out Jx, Tx, hands of BBs range which dominate the IP player (e.g. QJ, QT, KT, etc.) Linus also doesnt play with a donking range, so i would restrict donking, since it takes effect on future streets of the solution, once you allow it.

  • @FindingEquilibrium

    @FindingEquilibrium

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the feedback. How do you know he doesn't have a donking range?

  • @docpio6465

    @docpio6465

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@FindingEquilibrium i reviewed his game hundreds of hours

  • @jeraldtan3291

    @jeraldtan3291

    5 жыл бұрын

    For sure Linus has a donking range .. I have seen it in this series .. same two players bb vs btn.. a8o vs k6s maybe @is it gto can do a review of that hand ::p

  • @docpio6465

    @docpio6465

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yeah, it seems like he started to implement donking in some cases lately. I reviewed mainly hands from highstakes cashgames in 2016-2018

  • @zrmsraggot
    @zrmsraggot5 жыл бұрын

    Ive this guy online does a lot of small bet/call a raise on the river so good fold from 10Js here

  • @palasako8732
    @palasako87325 жыл бұрын

    GTO master 69

Келесі